Running to keep up with the lecturer or gradual de-ritualization? Biology students’ engagement with construction and data interpretation graphing routines in mathematical modelling tasks

Through a commognitive lens, we examine twelve first-semester biology students’. engagement with graphing routines as they work in groups, during four sessions of Mathematical Modelling (MM). We trace the students’ meta-level learning, particularly as they fluctuate between deploying graphs for mere illustration of data and as sense-making tools. We account for student activity in relation to precedent events in their experiences of graphing and as fluid, if not always productive, interplay between ritualised and exploratory engagement with graph construction and interpretation routines. The students’ construal of the task situations is marked by efforts to keep up with lecturer expectations which allow for changing degrees of student agency but do not factor in the influence of precedent events. Our analysis has pedagogical implications for the way MM problems are formulated and also foregrounds the capacity of the commognitive framework to trace de-ritualization and meta-level learning in students’ MM activity.     

Standing on each other’s shoulders: A case of coalescence between geometric discourses in peer interaction

In this paper we draw on the commognitive theory to examine novice students’ transition from familiar mathematics meta-rules to less familiar ones during peer interaction. To pursue this goal, we focused on a relatively symmetric interaction between two middle-school students given a geometric task. During their dyadic problem-solving, the students transitioned from configural procedures to deductive ones. We found that this transition included an interactive coalescence pattern in which one student “borrowed” her partner’s configural sub-procedures and built on them to develop a new deductive procedure. Furthermore, we found that during their peer interaction, the students oscillated between configural, coalesced and deductive procedures. Several patterns in the students’ interpretation of the task-situation contributed to these oscillations. We discuss the contribution of our findings to commognitive research, to geometry learning research and to peer learning research.     

Leveraging interdiscursivity to support elementary students in bridging the empirical-deductive gap: the case of parity

Research has recognized deductive reasoning as challenging but not impossible for young mathematics learners. In this paper, we present a learning environment developed to assist elementary-school students to bridge the empirical-deductive gap in the context of parity of numbers. Using the commognitive framework, we construe the empirical-deductive gap as part of a broader divide between two discourses that abide by different rules of a “mathematical game”: a discourse on specific numbers and a discourse on numeric patterns. Interdiscursivity is leveraged as a mechanism for instructional design, where students’ familiar routines with specific numbers are teased out and advanced to make sense in the new discourse. We mobilize this mechanism to create opportunities for students to play an active role in recognizing issues with empirical reasoning and generating deductive arguments to establish the validity of universal statements. The environment is illustrated with a small group of 8-year-olds who learned to justify deductively that “odd + odd = even”.     

The functions of function discourse – university mathematics teaching from a commognitive standpoint

This paper addresses a topic within university mathematics education which has been somewhat underexplored: the teaching practices actually used by university mathematics teachers when giving lectures. The study investigates the teaching practices of seven Swedish university teachers on the topic of functions using a discursive approach, the commognitive framework of Sfard. In the paper a categorization of the construction and substantiation routines used by the teachers is presented, for instance various routines for constructing definitions and examples, and for verifying whether an example satisfies a given definition. The findings show that although the overall form of the lectures is similar, with teachers using ‘chalk talk’, and overt student participation limited to asking and answering questions, there are in fact significant differences in the way the teachers present and do mathematics in their lectures. These differences present themselves both on the level of discursive routines and on a more general level in how the process of doing mathematics is made visible in the teachers’ teaching practices. Moreover, I believe that many of the results of the study could be relevant for investigating the teaching of other mathematical topics.     

The discursive footprint of learning across mathematical domains: The case of the tangent line

This paper employs the commognitive frame (Sfard, 2008) to investigate how experiences with tangents across mathematical domains leave their marks on students’ subsequent work with tangents. To this aim, I introduce the notion of the discursive footprint of tangents and its characteristics by reviewing how tangents are used across mathematical domains in school textbooks. Manifestations of this footprint were sought in 182 undergraduate mathematics students’ responses to a questionnaire about tangents by labelling their responses and by identifying patterns in the endorsed narratives. Manifestations include the identification of characteristics of sole (and combination of) discourses (geometry, algebra, calculus, mathematical analysis) in student responses. Five themes emerged from the analysis: apparent replication of word use in different narratives; geometry-local hybrid discourse; endorsement of conflicting narratives; enrichment of familiar narratives with new words; and, mathematical analysis as a subsuming discourse. Finally, I discuss the potency of the discursive footprint in research and teaching.     

Interactionist perspective on negotiation processes of students’ different understandings during small group work on linear algebra

Student group work represents a central learning setting within mathematics programs at the university level. In this study, a theoretical perspective on collaboration is adopted in which the differences between students’ interpretations of a mathematical concept are seen as an opportunity for individual restructuring processes. This so-called interactionist perspective is applied to student group work on linear algebra. The concepts of linear algebra at the university level are characterized by a versatility of different modes of expression and interpretation. For students of linear algebra, the flexible transitions between the different interpretations of linear algebra concepts usually pose a challenge. This study focuses on how students negotiate their different interpretations during group work on linear algebra and how transitions between interpretations might be stimulated or hindered. Video recordings of eight student groups working on a task that required flexible transition between interpretations of homomorphisms were sampled. The recordings were analyzed from an interactionist perspective, focusing on interaction situations in which the participating students expressed and negotiated different interpretations of homomorphisms. The analyses of students’ interactions highlight a phenomenon whereby differences in students’ interpretations remain implicit in group discussions, which constitutes an obstacle to the negotiation process.     

High‐School Students' Approaches to Solving Algebra Problems that are Posed Symbolically: Results from an Interview Study

A cross‐curricular structured‐probe task‐based clinical interview study with 44 pairs of third year high‐school mathematics students, most of whom were high achieving, was conducted to investigate their approaches to a variety of algebra problems. This paper presents results from three problems that were posed in symbolic form. Two problems are TIMSS items (a linear inequality and an equation involving square roots). The other problem involves square roots. We found that the majority of student pairs used symbol manipulation when solving the problems, and while many students seemed to prefer symbolic over graphical and tabular representations in their first attempt at solving the problems, we found that it was common for student pairs to use more than one strategy throughout the course of their solving. Students' use of graphing calculators to solve the problems is discussed.     

Teaching practices aimed at promoting meta-level learning: The case of complex numbers

In this paper we seek to promote a conceptualization of “teaching toward meta-level learning” based on theoretical and empirical aspects. We adopt the commognitive distinction between object- and meta-level learning, and relate to meta-level learning as involving changes in the metarules that govern the discourse. Specifically, we refer to changes in the discourse on numbers emerging in the shift in discourse from real to complex numbers. We applied implications from the commognitive theory about meta-level learning to the planning and teaching of a lesson about complex numbers. Then, we analyzed the lesson to identify teaching practices that could promote meta-level learning. We found that these teaching practices can be clustered into three theory driven sub-sets: those referring to students’ current discourse on numbers, those referring to their new discourse and those referring to the transition between the two.     

Problematizing mathematics and its pedagogy through teacher engagement with history-focused and classroom situation-specific tasks

We explore the conjecture that engaging teachers with activities which feature mathematical practices from the past (history-focused tasks) and in today’s mathematics classrooms (mathtasks) can promote teachers’ problematizing of mathematics and its pedagogy. Here, we sample evidence of discursive shifts observed as twelve mathematics teachers engage with a set of problematizing activities (PA) – three rounds of history-focused and mathtask combinations – during a four–month postgraduate course. We trace how the commognitive conflicts orchestrated in the PA triggered changes in the teachers’ narratives about: mathematical objects (such as what a function is); how mathematical objects come to be (such as what led to the emergence of the function object); and, pedagogy (such as what value may lie in listening to students or in trialing innovative assessment practices). Our study explores a hitherto under-researched capacity of the commognitive framework to steer the design, evidence identification and impact evaluation of pedagogical interventions.     

On learning that could have happened: The same tale in two cities

In this commognitive study, we take a close look at the interactive problem-solving by two middle-school students’ dyads, one of which participated in research conducted in Montreal, Canada in 1992, and the other, 25 years later, was a part of a classroom investigation in Melbourne, Australia. The present study was inspired by the second author’s impression of similarity between the two cases. Our analyses, conducted with the help of special constructs, participation profiles, participation structures and roles-in-activity, brought two types of results. First, striking likeness was identified between the two cases in the characteristics of interactions that could be responsible for the production and utilization of learning opportunities. Role conflict likely experienced by the participants emerged as a factor undermining the effectiveness of learning-in-peer-interaction. Second, the confirmation of the similarity, combined with a theoretically supported analysis of mechanisms of interaction, corroborated the claim about generalizability of findings in commognitive case studies.     

Learning beginning algebra in a computer-intensive environment

We present a design research on learning beginning algebra in an environment where spreadsheets were available at all times but the decision about using them or not, and how, in any particular situation was left to the students. Students’ activity is analyzed in Kieran’s framework of generational, transformational and global/meta-level activity, and compared to the designers’ intentions. We do this by focusing on the activity of one student in four sessions spread over several months and discussing the activity of 51 additional students in view of the analysis of the focus student. We show that the environment enables a number of different entries into algebra and as such supports students in becoming autonomous learners of algebra, and in making the shift from arithmetic to algebra via generational and global/meta-level activity before dealing with the more technical transformational activities.     

Teaching routines and student-centered mathematics instruction: The essential role of conferring to understand student thinking and reasoning

We compare two lessons with respect to how a teacher centers student mathematical thinking to move instruction forward through enactment of five mathematically productive teaching routines: Conferring To Understand Student Thinking and Reasoning, Structuring Mathematical Student Talk, Working With Selected and Sequenced Student Math Ideas, Working with Public Records of Students’ Mathematical Thinking, and Orchestrating Mathematical Discussion. Findings show that the lessons differ in the enactment of teaching routines, especially Conferring to Understand Student Thinking and Reasoning which resulted in a difference in student-centeredness of the instruction. This difference highlights whose mathematics was being centralized in the classroom and whether the focus was on correct answers and procedures or on students’ mathematical thinking and justifying.     

On roots and squares – estimation,intuition and creativity

The paper presents findings of a small scale study of a few items related to problem solving with squares and roots, for different teacher groups (pre-service and in-service mathematics teachers: elementary and junior high school). The research participants were asked to explain what would be the units digit of a natural number to be squared in order to obtain a certain units digit as a result. They were also asked to formulate a rule – an algorithm for calculating the square of a 2-digit number which is a multiple of 5. Based on this knowledge and estimation capability, they were required to find, without using calculators, the square roots of given natural numbers. The findings show that most of the participants had only partial intuition regarding the units’ digit of a number which is squared when the units’ digit of the square is known. At the same time, the participants manifested some evidence of creativity and flow of ideas in identifying the rule for calculating the square of a natural number whose units digit is 5. However, when asked to identify, by means of estimation and based on knowledge from previous items, the square roots of three natural numbers, only few of them managed to find the three roots by estimation.     

Differentiation of teaching and learning mathematics: an action research study in tertiary education

Diversity and differentiation within our classrooms, at all levels of education, is nowadays a fact. It has been one of the biggest challenges for educators to respond to the needs of all students in such a mixed-ability classroom. Teachers’ inability to deal with students with different levels of readiness in a different way leads to school failure and all the negative outcomes that come with it. Differentiation of teaching and learning helps addressing this problem by respecting the different levels that exist in the classroom, and by responding to the needs of each learner. This article presents an action research study where a team of mathematics instructors and an expert in curriculum development developed and implemented a differentiated instruction learning environment in a first-year engineering calculus class at a university in Cyprus. This study provides evidence that differentiated instruction has a positive effect on student engagement and motivation and improves students’ understanding of difficult calculus concepts.     

The Advantages of an STS Approach Over a Typical Textbook Dominated Approach in Middle School Science

Two sections of middle school science were taught by two longtime teachers where one used an STS approach and the other followed the more typical textbook approach closely. Pre‐ and post assessments were administered to one section of students for each teacher. The testing focused on student concept mastery, general science achievement, concept applications, use of concepts in new situations, and attitudes toward science. Videotapes of classroom actions were recorded and analyzed to determine the level of the use of STS teaching strategies in the two sections. Information was also be collected that gave evidence of and noted changes in student creativity and the continuation of student learning and the use of it beyond the classroom. Major findings indicate that students experiencing the STS format where constructivist teaching practices were used to (a) learn basic concepts as well as students who studied them directly from the textbook, (b) achieve as much in terms of general concept mastery as students who studied almost exclusively by using a textbook closely, (c) apply science concepts in new situations better than students who studied science in a more traditional way, (d) develop more positive attitudes about science, (e) exhibit creativity skills more often and more uniquely, and (f) learn and use science at home and in the community more than did students in the textbook dominated classroom.     

Understanding How Students Develop Mathematical Models

in this article, we discuss findings from a research study designed to characterize students' development of significant mathematical models by examining the shifts in their thinking that occur during problem investigations. These problem investigations were designed to elicit the development of mathematical models that can be used to describe and explain the relations, patterns, and structure found in data from experienced situations. We were particularly interested in a close examination of the student interactions that appear to foster the development of such mathematical models. This classroom-based qualitative case study was conducted with precalculus students enrolled in a moderate-sized private research university. We observed several groups of 3 students each as they worked together on 5 different modeling tasks. In each task, the students were asked to create a quantitative system that could describe and explain the patterns and structures in an experienced situation and that could be used to make predictions about the situation. Our analysis of the data revealed 4 sources of mismatches that were significant in bringing about the occurrence of shifts in student thinking: conjecturing, questioning, impasses to progress, and the use of technology-based representations. The shifts in thinking in turn led to the development of mathematical models. These results suggest that students would benefit from learning environments that provide them with ample opportunity to express their ideas, ask questions, make reasoned guesses, and work with technology while engaging in problem situations that elicit the development of significant mathematical models.     

Student teachers’ types of probing questions in inquiry-based mathematics teaching with and without GeoGebra

Previous studies have produced several typologies of teacher questions in mathematics. Probing questions that ask students to explain are often included in the types of questions. However, only rare studies have created subtypes for probing questions or investigated how questioning differs depending on whether technology is used or not. The aims of this study are to elaborate on different ways of asking students to give explanations in inquiry-based mathematics teaching and to investigate whether questioning in GeoGebra lessons differs from questioning in other lessons. Data was collected by video recording 29 Finnish mathematics student teachers’ lessons in secondary and upper secondary schools. The lesson videos were coded for the student teachers’ probing questions. After this, categories for the types of probing questions were created, which is elaborated in this paper. It was found that the student teachers who used GeoGebra emphasized conceptual probing questions during the explore phase of a lesson slightly more than the other student teachers.     

Changing students’ beliefs about the relevance of mathematics in an advanced secondary mathematics class

ABSTRACT

This study shows that using authentic contexts for learning differential equations in a differentiation-by-interest setting can enhance students’ beliefs about the relevance of mathematics. The students in this study were studying advanced mathematics (wiskunde D) at upper secondary school in the Netherlands. These students are often not aware of the relevance of the mathematics they have to learn in school. More insights into the application of mathematics in other sciences can be beneficial for these students in terms of preparation for their future study and career. A course differentiating by student interest with new context-rich curriculum materials was developed in order to enhance students’ beliefs about the relevance of mathematics. The intervention aimed at teaching differential equations through guided small-group tasks in scientific, medical or economical contexts. The results show that students’ beliefs about the relevance of mathematics improved, and they appreciated experiencing how the mathematics was applied in real-life situations.     

Understanding How Students Develop Mathematical Models

in this article, we discuss findings from a research study designed to characterize students' development of significant mathematical models by examining the shifts in their thinking that occur during problem investigations. These problem investigations were designed to elicit the development of mathematical models that can be used to describe and explain the relations, patterns, and structure found in data from experienced situations. We were particularly interested in a close examination of the student interactions that appear to foster the development of such mathematical models. This classroom-based qualitative case study was conducted with precalculus students enrolled in a moderate-sized private research university. We observed several groups of 3 students each as they worked together on 5 different modeling tasks. In each task, the students were asked to create a quantitative system that could describe and explain the patterns and structures in an experienced situation and that could be used to make predictions about the situation. Our analysis of the data revealed 4 sources of mismatches that were significant in bringing about the occurrence of shifts in student thinking: conjecturing, questioning, impasses to progress, and the use of technology-based representations. The shifts in thinking in turn led to the development of mathematical models. These results suggest that students would benefit from learning environments that provide them with ample opportunity to express their ideas, ask questions, make reasoned guesses, and work with technology while engaging in problem situations that elicit the development of significant mathematical models.     

Emergent modeling: discrete graphs to support the understanding of change and velocity

In this paper we focus on an instructional sequence that aims at supporting students in their learning of the basic principles of rate of change and velocity. The conjectured process of teaching and learning is supposed to ensure that the mathematical and physical concepts will be rooted in students’ understanding of everyday-life situations. Students’ inventions are supported by carefully planned activities and tools that fit their reasoning. The central design heuristic of the instructional sequence is emergent modeling. We created an educational setting in three tenth grade classrooms to investigate students’ learning with this sequence. The design research is carried out in order to contribute to a local instruction theory on calculus. Classroom events and computer activities are video-taped, group work is audio-taped and student materials are collected. Qualitative analyses show that with the emergent modeling approach, the basic principles of calculus can be developed from students’ reasoning on motion, when they are supported by discrete graphs.