A national traceability system for chemical measurements

Current developments in Germany for establishing a traceability system for chemical measurements are reported. The focus is on a dissemination mechanism which employs chemical calibration laboratories accredited within the framework of the German Calibration Service (DKD) and acting as "multipliers" between the national standards level and the user level by providing the user with calibration means which are traceable to the SI via national standards. At the national standards level, a network of high-level chemistry institutes coordinated by the national metrology institute, PTB, provides the primary references for chemical measurements.The use of the metrological dissemination system provided by the DKD also for chemical measurements is a logical extension of a traceability mechanism, successful for more than two decades in general metrology, to metrology in chemistry. In detail, traceability structures in clinical chemistry, electrochemistry, elemental analysis and gas analysis are described. This system has become an important part of the efforts made in Germany to support chemical laboratories in meeting the traceability requirements of the market and of legal regulations.     

The Japanese traceability system and the role of uncertainty evaluation in measurement

 The new traceability system of measurement standards based on the Japanese Measurement Law has been established since November 1993. Some reference materials such as metal standard solutions, pH standard solutions and standard gas mixtures are included in the system together with relevant physical quantities. In this system, primary measurement standard instruments or primary reference materials are designated by the regulation for each quantity. For the practical dissemination of each quantity, accreditation of calibration bodies is recognized by the steering committee under the supervision of the government. In the course of assessment of a candidate calibration body, the concepts of ISO/IEC Guide 25 and ISO/IEC Guide 58 are effectively introduced. For the estimation of reliability, the concept of how to introduce the statistical approach is effectively considered. The method of uncertainty evaluation described in the ISO document entitled "Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement" is adopted.     

Development of pH measurement system for legal traceability of pH standard solutions

The best reproducible technology of pH measurement for precise pH buffer solutions regulated by Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS) was studied. A pH meter was devised with a high resolution of +/- 0.0001 pH. An 18-bit analog-to-digital converter is used, one-bit resolution corresponding to 0.0019 mV (ca. 0.000032 pH) against an input electrode potential +/- 500 mV. Digital data were treated smoothly for some types of noise, a reproducibility of +/- 0.0002 pH being obtained with a potentiometer. A flow cell was devised to attain temperature control within +/- 0.03 degrees C and air-tight measurement prevented contamination with carbon dioxide. Also, the flow cell has a structure such that potassium chloride (KCl) inner solution effused from a ceramic junction of the reference electrode designed so as not to touch the glass membrane. A combination pH electrode (a glass electrode and a reference electrode) was assembled to minimize the dead volume of sample solution. This highly sensitive pH measuring system, consisting of a pH meter, a flow cell, a combination pH electrode, a circulating water thermostat and a peristaltic pump, was used for the certification of pH standard solutions in Japanese metrological law. The performance of this system was within +/- 0.0006 pH reproducibility and 20-30 min response time (5 min within +/- 0.0002 pH) at a sample flow rate of 3 ml min (-1).     

Improved traceability of pH measurements

Traceability is a prerequisite for the comparability and uniformity of measurements. Although pH-measurements are carried out on a large scale in laboratory and industry, the problems involved in the traceability of pH values have not adequately been solved in the past. The comparability of pH measurements is limited, among other parameters, by the accuracy of the pH values of the standard buffer solutions used to calibrate the pH meter-electrode assemblies. The measured pH(X) value must be traceable to primary standard pH(PS) values through an unbroken chain of comparisons, all values having stated uncertainties. A new primary standard measurement device for pH is used to certify primary pH reference materials from which these secondary reference materials can be derived.     

The traceability of analytical measurements

 Traceability to the System International (SI) is an important prerequisite for international comparability and uniformity of chemical measurements to ensure mutual recognition of the results. In theory, all measurements can be traced back to the seven base units of the SI. Although the traceability system works well for most physical measurements, in many analytical and in some spectrophotometric measurements this system is not satisfactory. This paper describes the particular and practical problems and the contribution of the Romanian National Institute of Metrology in this field. The paper discusses the following concepts: clearly defined targets in the form of requirement specification, knowledge of trueness and/or measurement uncertainty, and traceability through an unbroken chain of calibration to primary standards. Traceability and uncertainty being two concepts inherently coupled, two examples of assessment of the uncertainty of measurement results are given for two spectrophotometric methods currently used in chemical laboratories. Received: 17 July 1996 Accepted: 2 September 1996     

Metrological traceability in laboratory medicine

 The establishment of a reference examination system necessary for metrological traceability of the many types of sophisticated examination result in laboratory medicine is a daunting task, which has been made mandatory by the EU Directive on in vitro diagnostic medical devices and the requirements for accreditation. Following a definition of examinand and allowed examination uncertainty, a dedicated calibration hierarchy is established from stated reference through alternating reference examination procedures and calibrators providing a traceability chain from examination result to the reference, often a definition of a measurement unit. The various types of possible calibration hierarchy are outlined in EN ISO Standards. Recent efforts by national and international stakeholders to establish a global reference examination system have led to the creation of a Joint Committee on Traceability in Laboratory Medicine with the International Committee for Weights and Measures, International Bureau of Weights and Measures, International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation, and World Health Organization as the principal promoters. This structure will identify reference procedures, reference materials, and reference laboratories, and seek support for further prioritised and coordinated development of the system. Received: 1 August 2002 Accepted: 22 November 2002 Based on a lecture at an IUPAC Seminar, EC JRC Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, Geel, BE, 2001–12–18 Correspondence to R. Dybkaer     

Protocols for traceability in chemical analysis

 The authors propose definitions and terminology for protocols on traceability links, generally to the international system of units, for specific chemical-analytical measurements in accordance with recognized principles of science. These definitions and terms could be useful in science, technology, commerce or law. A chain of such links leads from a measurand in a sample up to a unit in the International System of Units or, if unavailable, to a value on an internationally recognized measurement scale. The quality of such a chain is quantified by combining all recognized uncertainties estimated for all its links. These uncertainties of the measured values arise from many potential error sources. The protocols should give details of specific uses of reference materials, measuring instruments and standard measurement methods. Received: 12 January 1997 Accepted: 31 January 1997     

Protocols for traceability in chemical analysis

 In continuing their attempt to bring general issues concerned with trustworthy chemical measurements to review and international discussion, the authors propose basic aims and requirements for protocols of chemical-measurement procedures with traceability to the SI or, where this is not possible, to units of internationally recognized measurement scales. Documents describing such protocols could be useful in science, technology, law, or trade. Concepts and definitions for protocols have been introduced in Part I of this contribution. Part II here deals with the development and application of protocols for intended in-laboratory, commercial, national, or international recognition. Protocols deal with measurement methods, instrumentation, and the estimation of uncertainties from all possible sources of measurement errors. Uncertainties define the quality of all links in a traceability chain starting from the value of a measurand in a sample, often through a certified value in a reference material, either to the SI, or – if this is not possible – to a value on a suitable, internationally agreed measurement scale. A protocol may concern itself with the complex interplay between uncertainties, tolerances, and any limit values introduced by the set aims of specific measurements. Received: 23 April 1997 Accepted: 27 April 1997     

The traceability scheme in chemical measurement

 Traceability is an essential property of a measurement result. However, it is recognized that the results of chemical measurements can be lacking in this property. In this paper we try to show how to understand and establish traceability in chemical measurement. The traceability connotation and the necessity of tracing back to SI units are described by means of comparability well-known. The roles and interrelationships of quality assurance, accreditation, calibration, reference material, analytical method, comparison and uncertainty in establishing traceability are explained with the aid of a block diagram. The paper also includes diagrams illustrating the Chinese situation and experience of establishing traceability for chemical measurement in China.     

Establishing measurement traceability in clinical chemistry

Measurement traceability is probably the most important tool for achievement of comparability in clinical chemistry. As stipulated by the In Vitro Diagnostica Directive of the European Union and several ISO standards, values assigned to calibrators and control materials must be traceable to reference materials and/or reference procedures of higher order. In the German proficiency testing system, statutory use of reference measurement procedures for several measurands has been in force since 1988. As a result, reference procedures are now regularly applied for the setting up of target values in the control samples of internal and external quality assessment and for assigning values to the manufacturers calibrator and control materials. Noticeably, the comparability of results obtained by different diagnostic tests has greatly improved for the measurement of many metabolites and substrates, e.g. creatinine, cholesterol, uric acid, total glycerol and urea. For many measurands in laboratory medicine the implementation of the concept of traceability proves to be much more difficult; this mainly concerns the measurement of proteins, in particular enzymes, proteo-hormones, tumour markers and cardiac markers. For such measurands the analyte must first of all be distinctively defined before a reference system can be established which comprises reference procedures, reference materials and networks of reference laboratories.Presented at the CCQM Workshop on Traceability 16–17 April 2002 at the BIPM, Sèvres, France     

Is traceability an exclusive property of analytical results? An extended approach to traceability in chemical analysis

The need to adapt the definition of traceability in the Metrological Dictionary of ISO to the growing use of this concept in Analytical Chemistry aroused the broader, more flexible proposal expounded in this paper which aims to be closer to the bench level. The traceability concept is addressed in a hierarchical manner by ranking the different notions to which the qualifier “traceable” applies (results, standards, equipment and samples) in such a way that it is compatible with the ISO definition. Relationships among them and with classical analytical properties are also exposed. Received: 12 May 1997 / Revised: 22 July 1997 / Accepted: 25 July 1997     

Is traceability an exclusive property of analytical results? An extended approach to traceability in chemical analysis

The need to adapt the definition of traceability in the Metrological Dictionary of ISO to the growing use of this concept in Analytical Chemistry aroused the broader, more flexible proposal expounded in this paper which aims to be closer to the bench level. The traceability concept is addressed in a hierarchical manner by ranking the different notions to which the qualifier “traceable” applies (results, standards, equipment and samples) in such a way that it is compatible with the ISO definition. Relationships among them and with classical analytical properties are also exposed. Received: 12 May 1997 / Revised: 22 July 1997 / Accepted: 25 July 1997     

Measurement principles for traceability in chemical analysis

 By the definition of the mole as a base unit for amount-of-substance measures within the International System of Units (SI), chemists can make chemical measurements in full compliance with established metrological principles. Since the mole requires exact knowledge of the chemical entity, which is often neither available nor of practical relevance to the purpose of the measurement, the SI units of mass or length (for volume) are unavoidable in the expression of results of many chemical measurements. Science, technology, and trade depend upon a huge and ever increasing number and variety of chemical determinations to quantify material composition and quality. Thus, international harmonization in the assessments of processes, procedures, and results is highly desirable and clearly cost effective. The authors, with relevant experience and responsibilities in Europe and America, have found some consensus in the interpretation of the metrological principles for chemical measurements, but believe open discussion should precede wide implementation by chemical communities. In fostering this dialogue, this paper shows, for instance, that more precise interpretation of the definitions for "traceability," "calibration," and "validation" is needed for present-day chemical measurements. Problems that face scientists in making measurements do not all vanish just by adherence to the SI. However, such compliance can improve communication among chemists and metrologists. Received: 30 June 1995 Accepted: 30 June 1995