Remarks about disjoint dominating sets

We prove several structural and hardness results concerning pairs of disjoint sets in graphs which are dominating or independent and dominating.     

Graphs with few total dominating sets

We give a lower bound for the number of total dominating sets of a graph together with a characterization of the extremal graphs, for trees as well as arbitrary connected graphs of given order. Moreover, we obtain a sharp lower bound involving both the order and the total domination number, and characterize the extremal graphs as well.     

Locating and paired-dominating sets in graphs

In this paper, we continue the study of paired-domination in graphs introduced by Haynes and Slater [T.W. Haynes, P.J. Slater, Paired-domination in graphs, Networks 32 (1998), 199–206]. A paired-dominating set of a graph G with no isolated vertex is a dominating set S of vertices whose induced subgraph has a perfect matching. We consider paired-dominating sets which are also locating sets, that is distinct vertices of G are dominated by distinct subsets of the paired-dominating set. We consider three variations of sets which are paired-dominating and locating sets and investigate their properties.     

Augmenting a graph of minimum degree 2 to have two disjoint total dominating sets

A total dominating set of a graph is a set of vertices such that every vertex is adjacent to a vertex in the set. We show that given a graph of order n with minimum degree at least 2, one can add at most edges such that the resulting graph has two disjoint total dominating sets, and this bound is best possible.     

Disjoint dominating and total dominating sets in graphs

It has been shown [M.A. Henning, J. Southey, A note on graphs with disjoint dominating and total dominating sets, Ars Combin. 89 (2008) 159-162] that every connected graph with minimum degree at least two that is not a cycle on five vertices has a dominating set D and a total dominating set T which are disjoint. We characterize such graphs for which D∪T necessarily contains all vertices of the graph and that have no induced cycle on five vertices.     

Block graphs with unique minimum dominating sets

For any graph G a set D of vertices of G is a dominating set, if every vertex vV(G)−D has at least one neighbor in D. The domination number γ(G) is the smallest number of vertices in any dominating set. In this paper, a characterization is given for block graphs having a unique minimum dominating set. With this result, we generalize a theorem of Gunther, Hartnell, Markus and Rall for trees.     

Independent dominating sets and hamiltonian cycles

A graph is uniquely hamiltonian if it contains exactly one hamiltonian cycle. In this note we prove that there are no r‐regular uniquely hamiltonian graphs when r > 22. This improves upon earlier results of Thomassen. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 54: 233–244, 2007     

Vertex covers and eternal dominating sets

The eternal domination problem requires a graph to be protected against an infinitely long sequence of attacks on vertices by guards located at vertices, the configuration of guards inducing a dominating set at all times. An attack at a vertex with no guard is defended by sending a guard from a neighboring vertex to the attacked vertex. We allow any number of guards to move to neighboring vertices at the same time in response to an attack. We compare the eternal domination number with the vertex cover number of a graph. One of our main results is that the eternal domination number is less than the vertex cover number of any graph of minimum degree at least two having girth at least nine.     

On disjoint sets of differences

We investigate integer sequences A and B where {A ? A} ∩ {B ? B} = 0. We solve a problem of P. Erdös and R. L. Graham and prove several results on the behaviour of $\text{A(x)}\text{B(x)}\text{x}$, $\text{A(x)}\text{√x}$ and $\text{B(x)}\text{√x}$.     

Strongly dominating sets of reals

We analyze the structure of strongly dominating sets of reals introduced in Goldstern et al. (Proc Am Math Soc 123(5):1573–1581, 1995). We prove that for every ${\kappa < \mathfrak{b}}$ κ < b a ${\kappa}$ κ -Suslin set ${A\subseteq{}^\omega\omega}$ A ? ω ω is strongly dominating if and only if A has a Laver perfect subset. We also investigate the structure of the class l of Baire sets for the Laver category base and compare the σ-ideal of sets which are not strongly dominating with the Laver ideal l ⁰.     

Vertices contained in all minimum paired-dominating sets of a tree

A set S of vertices in a graph G is called a paired-dominating set if it dominates V and 〈S〉 contains at least one perfect matching. We characterize the set of vertices of a tree that are contained in all minimum paired-dominating sets of the tree.     

Thin stationary sets and disjoint club sequences

We describe two opposing combinatorial properties related to adding clubs to : the existence of a thin stationary subset of and the existence of a disjoint club sequence on . A special Aronszajn tree on implies there exists a thin stationary set. If there exists a disjoint club sequence, then there is no thin stationary set, and moreover there is a fat stationary subset of which cannot acquire a club subset by any forcing poset which preserves and . We prove that the existence of a disjoint club sequence follows from Martin's Maximum and is equiconsistent with a Mahlo cardinal.

     

Chebyshev polynomials for disjoint compact sets

We are concerned with the problem of finding among all polynomials of degreen with leading coefficient 1, the one which has minimal uniform norm on the union of two disjoint compact sets in the complex plane. Our main object here is to present a class of disjoint sets where the best approximation can be determined explicitly for alln. A closely related approximation problem is obtained by considering all polynomials that have degree no larger thann and satisfy an interpolatory constraint. Such problems arise in certain iterative matrix computations. Again, we discuss a class of disjoint compact sets where the optimal polynomial is explicitly known for alln.Communicated by Doron S. Lubinsky     

Locating and total dominating sets in trees

A set S of vertices in a graph G=(V,E) is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of V is adjacent to a vertex in S. We consider total dominating sets of minimum cardinality which have the additional property that distinct vertices of V are totally dominated by distinct subsets of the total dominating set.     

Covering point sets with two disjoint disks or squares

We study the following problem: Given a set of red points and a set of blue points on the plane, find two unit disks C_R and C_B with disjoint interiors such that the number of red points covered by C_R plus the number of blue points covered by C_B is maximized. We give an algorithm to solve this problem in O(n^8/3log²n) time, where n denotes the total number of points. We also show that the analogous problem of finding two axis-aligned unit squares S_R and S_B instead of unit disks can be solved in O(nlogn) time, which is optimal. If we do not restrict ourselves to axis-aligned squares, but require that both squares have a common orientation, we give a solution using O(n³logn) time.     

New dominating sets in social networks

Motivated by applications in social networks, a new type of dominating set has been studied in the literature. In this paper, we present results regarding the complexity and approximation in general graphs.     

Almost disjoint families of connected sets

We investigate the question which (separable metrizable) spaces have a ‘large’ almost disjoint family of connected (and locally connected) sets. Every compact space of dimension at least 2 as well as all compact spaces containing an ‘uncountable star’ have such a family. Our results show that the situation for 1-dimensional compacta is unclear.     

Disjoint independent dominating sets in graphs

A set X of vertices of G is an independent dominating set if no two vertices of X are adjacent and each vertex not in X is adjacent to at least one vertex in X. Independent dominating sets of G are cliques of the complement $\text{G}$ of G and conversely.This work is concerned with the existence of disjoint independent dominating sets in a graph G. A new parameter, the maximum number of disjoint independent dominating sets in G, is studied and the class of graphs whose vertex sets partition into independent dominating sets is investigated.