An Investigation of Relationships between Seventh-Grade Students' Beliefs and Their Participation during Mathematics Discussions in Two Classrooms

As mathematics teachers attempt to promote classroom discourse that emphasizes reasoning about mathematical concepts and supports students' development of mathematical autonomy, not all students will participate similarly. For the purposes of this research report, I examined how 15 seventh-grade students participated during whole-class discussions in two mathematics classrooms. Additionally, I interpreted the nature of students' participation in relation to their beliefs about participating in whole-class discussions, extending results reported previously (Jansen, 2006 Jansen, A. 2006. Seventh graders' motivations for participating in two discussion-oriented mathematics classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 106: 409–428. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) about a wider range of students' beliefs and goals in discussion-oriented mathematics classrooms. Students who believed mathematics discussions were threatening avoided talking about mathematics conceptually across both classrooms, yet these students participated by talking about mathematics procedurally. In addition, students' beliefs about appropriate behavior during mathematics class appeared to constrain whether they critiqued solutions of their classmates in both classrooms. Results suggest that coordinating analyses of students' beliefs and participation, particularly focusing on students who participate outside of typical interaction patterns in a classroom, can provide insights for engaging more students in mathematics classroom discussions.     

Teaching Mathematics with a New Curriculum: Changes to Classroom Organization and Interactions

This report describes a high school mathematics teacher's decisions about classroom organization and interactions during his first two years using a new curriculum intended to support teachers' development of student-centered, contributive classroom discourse. In year one, the teacher conducted class and interacted with students primarily in small groups. In year two, he conducted more whole-class instruction. In both years, teacher-student interactions contained univocal and contributive discourse, but in year two the teacher sustained contributive discourse with students for longer periods. The teacher facilitated the most significant changes to classroom discourse in the instructional format with which he had the greatest experience (whole-class instruction). Over the period of this study, two key factors appeared to affect the teacher's decisions about classroom organization and interactions: his perception of students' expectations about mathematics classroom roles and activity, and his own discomfort associated with using a new curriculum. These areas are important candidates for future research about teachers' use of innovative mathematics curricula.     

The Development of Mathematical Discussions: An Investigation in a Fifth-Grade Classroom

Promoting discussion and argumentation of mathematical ideas among students are aspects of the vision for communication in recent school mathematics reform efforts. Having rich mathematical discussions, however, can present a variety of classroom challenges. Many factors influence classroom discussions and need to be addressed in ways that will assist teachers in creating more inquiry-based mathematics classrooms. The study presented here examined the development of mathematical discussions in a fifth-grade classroom over the course of a school year. Various aspects of the participants' interactions, teacher's pedagogy, and the classroom microculture were investigated. One major result is the evolution of student participation from nonactive listening to active listening and use of others' ideas to develop new conjectures. These changes were paralleled by changes in the teacher's role in the classroom and the nature of her questions, in particular.     

The Development of Mathematical Discussions: An Investigation in a Fifth-Grade Classroom

Promoting discussion and argumentation of mathematical ideas among students are aspects of the vision for communication in recent school mathematics reform efforts. Having rich mathematical discussions, however, can present a variety of classroom challenges. Many factors influence classroom discussions and need to be addressed in ways that will assist teachers in creating more inquiry-based mathematics classrooms. The study presented here examined the development of mathematical discussions in a fifth-grade classroom over the course of a school year. Various aspects of the participants' interactions, teacher's pedagogy, and the classroom microculture were investigated. One major result is the evolution of student participation from nonactive listening to active listening and use of others' ideas to develop new conjectures. These changes were paralleled by changes in the teacher's role in the classroom and the nature of her questions, in particular.     

“Do we teach subjects or students?” Analyzing science and mathematics teacher conversations about issues of equity in the classroom

Teachers involved in a Master's level course in diversity participated in virtual, synchronous, anonymized discussions around issues of ethnic and racial diversity, gender, and stereotypes that could impact their students’ participation in fields related to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Guided by theoretical frameworks from Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) and Critical Race Theory (CRT), a convenience sample of 14 science and mathematics teachers participated in a series of virtual chats using open‐ended questioning and facilitated by two university instructors. Using conversation and critical discourse analyses, three primary themes emerged: understanding of issues related to stereotypes, encouragement of females and minorities to pursue careers in STEM, and the place for diversity discussions in science and mathematics classrooms. The teachers felt burdened by curricular and administrative constraints that inhibit their ability to participate in thought‐provoking critical conversations. The paper concludes with a discussion of ways teachers can assist in the STEM career identity development of their underrepresented females and students of color and calls for research that combines the key findings in SCCT and CRT to build confidence and capacity for teachers to effectively confront issues of racism, sexism, and stereotyping in science and mathematics classrooms.     

Generalization and Justification: The Challenge of Introducing Algebraic Reasoning Through Patterning Activities

The expectation that students be introduced to algebraic ideas at earlier grade levels places an increased burden on the classroom teacher to help students construct and justify generalizations. This study provides insight into the reasoning of 25 sixth-grade students as they approached patterning tasks in which they were required to develop and justify generalizations while using computer spreadsheets as an instructional tool. The students demonstrated both the potential and pitfalls of such activities. During whole-class discussions, students were generally able to provide appropriate generalizations and justify using generic examples. Students who used geometric schemes were more successful in providing general arguments and valid justifications. However, during small-group discussions, the students rarely justified their generalizations, with some students focusing more on particular values than on general relations. It is recommended that the various student strategies and justifications be brought to the forefront of classroom discussions so that students can examine the mathematical power and validity of the various strategies and justifications typically introduced by students.     

Examining Preservice Teacher Belief Changes in the Context of Coordinated Mathematics Methods Coursework and Classroom Experiences

The purpose of this study was to compare changes in beliefs of two groups of preservice teachers involved in two types of opportunities to immediately apply methods for teaching accompanying an elementary mathematics methods course. Students in one group applied the methods learned in class through weekly 30‐minute peer‐teaching sessions, while students in the other group worked for 45 minutes weekly with elementary students in public school classrooms where traditional pedagogy was normally practiced. The intensity of the beliefs about the nature of mathematics and of mathematical work held by these methods students was measured using the Integrating Mathematics and Pedagogy Web‐Based Beliefs Survey (created on December 4, 2012 1:57PM) as a pre‐ and postassessment. While both groups saw significant change in belief intensity across measurement occasions favoring a reform perspective, a significantly greater change was experienced by the group who applied methods in classrooms, despite the traditional practice that usually occurred in them. The authors hypothesize this greater change resulted from the benefits associated with working with children and from the instructor support that may have tended to nullify the effects of teaching in a classroom where traditional pedagogy was the norm.     

Sociocultural Factors Influencing Students' Learning in Science and Mathematics: An Analysis of the Perspectives of African American Students

The voices of African American students reveal sociocultural factors that influence their achievement in science and mathematics classes. Using a sociocultural theoretical framework ( Mercer & Covey, 1980 ), this ethnographic study interpreted the perspectives of five African American students as they discussed their learning experiences in science and mathematics classrooms. This framework acknowledges the vulnerability of the educational system to societal influences that inevitably assert cultural values and norms. The students' discussions provided insight into their beliefs about the varied ways in which sociocultural factors impact their learning in science and mathematics classrooms.     

“Mathematicians Would Say It This Way”: An Investigation of Teachers' Framings of Mathematicians

Although popular media often provides negative images of mathematicians, we contend that mathematics classroom practices can also contribute to students' images of mathematicians. In this study, we examined eight mathematics teachers' framings of mathematicians in their classrooms. Here, we analyze classroom observations to explore some of the characteristics of the teachers' framings of mathematicians in their classrooms. The findings suggest that there may be a relationship between a teachers' mathematics background and his/her references to mathematicians. We also argue that teachers need to be reflective about how they represent mathematicians to their students, and that preservice teachers should explore their beliefs about what mathematicians actually do.     

The mathematical beliefs and behavior of high school students: Insights from a longitudinal study

There is a documented need for more research on the mathematical beliefs of students below college. In particular, there is a need for more studies on how the mathematical beliefs of these students impact their mathematical behavior in challenging mathematical tasks. This study examines the beliefs on mathematical learning of five high school students and the students’ mathematical behavior in a challenging probability task. The students were participants in an after-school, classroom-based, longitudinal study on students’ development of mathematical ideas funded by the United States National Science Foundation. The results show that particular educational experiences can alter results from previous studies on the mathematical beliefs and behavior of students below college, some of which have been used to justify non-reform pedagogical approaches in mathematics classrooms. Implications for classroom practice and ideas for future research are discussed.     

Teaching Mathematics with a New Curriculum: Changes to Classroom Organization and Interactions

This report describes a high school mathematics teacher's decisions about classroom organization and interactions during his first two years using a new curriculum intended to support teachers' development of student-centered, contributive classroom discourse. In year one, the teacher conducted class and interacted with students primarily in small groups. In year two, he conducted more whole-class instruction. In both years, teacher-student interactions contained univocal and contributive discourse, but in year two the teacher sustained contributive discourse with students for longer periods. The teacher facilitated the most significant changes to classroom discourse in the instructional format with which he had the greatest experience (whole-class instruction). Over the period of this study, two key factors appeared to affect the teacher's decisions about classroom organization and interactions: his perception of students' expectations about mathematics classroom roles and activity, and his own discomfort associated with using a new curriculum. These areas are important candidates for future research about teachers' use of innovative mathematics curricula.     

Mathematics teaching practices with technology that support conceptual understanding for Latino/a students

We analyze how three seventh grade mathematics teachers from a majority Latino/a, linguistically diverse region of Texas taught the same lesson on interpreting graphs of motion as part of the Scaling Up SimCalc study (Roschelle et al., 2010). The students of two of the teachers made strong learning gains as measured by a curriculum-aligned assessment, while the students of the third teacher were less successful. To investigate these different outcomes, we compare the teaching practices in each classroom, focusing on the teachers’ use of class time and instructional format, their use of mathematical discourse practices in whole-class discussions, and their responses to student contributions. We show that the more successful teachers allowed time for students to use the curriculum and software and discuss it with peers, that they used formal mathematical discourse along with less formal language, and that they responded to student errors using higher-level moves. We conclude by discussing implications for teachers and mathematics educators, with special attention to issues related to the mathematics education of Latinos/as.     

Motivations and meanings of students' actions in six classrooms from Germany, Hong Kong and the United States

This article presents an analysis of about 100 interviews with students from eight-grade classrooms in Berlin, Hong Kong and San Diego that reconstructs student motivations and the meanings they attribute to classroom activities. The data of the six classrooms were produced in the Learner's Perspective Study (LPS). The LPS is an international collaboration of researchers investigating practices in eighthgrade mathematics classrooms in 13 countries. Although not the central focus of the research, the case study of six classrooms revealed a variety of students' beliefs and perceptions, which are the focus of this article. These correspond to the possibilities the classroom practices offer. The study also reveals some similarities among student motives and concerns across classrooms. The findings are an important reminder that basing a curriculum upon an alternative vision calls for changing mathematical content as well as the social relations that are established through teaching methods and principles of evaluation.     

The Relationship Between Teacher and Student Beliefs About Mathematics

In this study the relationship between teacher (n = 7) beliefs about mathematics, the learning and teaching of mathematics and their respective students' beliefs about mathematics (n = 158) are examined. The data were collected by means of two instruments specifically designed to measure belief systems about mathematics. Teacher scores were adjusted so that a higher score reflected beliefs in aligntnent with the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Standards. Results indicated that the students of teachers whose beliefs were in alignment with the NCTM Standards had significantly different beliefs about factors that lead to success in mathematics than did other students. Specifically these students felt that working hard to solve problems and striving for understanding would lead to success. No student differences were found for subscales of ego orientation, competitiveness, interest and extrinsic factors such as neatness and cooperation. These findings suggest that this group of teachers practiced what they believed and that these practices affected what their students believed about mathematics. We suggest that using these two assessments in tandem give a clearer picture of the mathematical environment within a classroom and can be used in professional development workshops to initiate teacher reflection about classroom practices.     

The Impact of Problem Posing on Elementary Teachers' Beliefs About Mathematics and Mathematics Teaching

This study investigated the impact of incorporating problem posing in elementary classrooms on the beliefs held by elementary teachers about mathematics and mathematics teaching. Teachers participated in a year‐long staff development project aimed at facilitating the incorporation of problem posing into their classrooms. Beliefs were examined via pre‐ and postsurvey. Results indicated a positive impact on their beliefs about mathematics and mathematics instruction. Data from open‐ended written responses verified the impact of problem posing on the teachers and their classrooms. Based on these findings, it is recommended that problem posing be incorporated into all professional learning and undergraduate education programs.     

THE NATURE OF PARTICIPATION AFFORDED BY TASKS,QUESTIONS AND PROMPTS IN MATHEMATICS CLASSROOMS

This paper reports on the development of an analytical instrument which identifies mathematical affordances in the public tasks, questions and prompts of mathematics classrooms. The aim is to become more articulate about mathematical activity. I have explored the use of several frameworks which identify learning outcomes, structures of knowledge, mental actions, teaching actions and intentions and found that none of them give me access to the detail of what makes one mathematics lesson different from another for learners. From the experience of using these I devised a new analytical tool which unfolds patterns of participation afforded in mathematics lessons. This tool has been tested on several videos of lessons, and has been used by pre-service teaching students to analyse their own lessons.     

Using Culturally Responsive Stories in Mathematics: Responses From the Target Audience

This study examined how Black students responded to the utilization of culturally responsive stories in their mathematics class. All students in the two classes participated in mathematics lessons that began with an African American story (culturally responsive to this population), followed by mathematical discussion and concluded with solving problems that correlated to the story. The researcher observed and recorded responses by students during each part of these lessons with protocols. Students independently reflected weekly by answering five questions to share their perspective on the African American stories. The teacher reflected on each lesson as well, describing thoughts on how these students responded to the story in each lesson. This paper examines the analyzed data from the target audience: Black students. Results revealed that Black students responded to the use of African American stories with high self‐rated levels of engagement and enjoyment and that the stories helped them think about mathematics to varying degrees. Since students who are engaged and are thinking about mathematics are more likely to achieve mathematical understanding, the researcher concludes that this strategy should continue to be tested in diverse classrooms with an emphasis on student reflection to determine if the outcomes are transferable and generalizable.     

Issues and Challenges for Middle School Mathematics Teachers in Inclusion Classrooms

The purpose of this qualitative study was to investigate typical middle school general education mathematics teachers' beliefs and knowledge of students with learning disabilities and inclusive instruction and to gain an understanding of the process of inclusion as it is implemented in middle school classrooms. In‐depth interviews, surveys, and classroom observations were conducted with seven teachers. The constant comparative method was used to analyze all interview and observation data. The findings reveal that even teachers who believe that inclusion is being successfully implemented are unclear about their responsibilities towards included students and the learning characteristics and specific mathematics teaching approaches that would be effective. The general educators feel that they were grossly under‐prepared during preservice and inservice for the realities of inclusion teaching. The study provides insights that can be used to enhance preservice and inservice programs for teachers and underscores the necessity for building teamwork and collaboration among general and special education middle school teachers.