一种基于虚拟决策单元的排序方法的完善和扩展

本文对文[1]中提出的基于虚拟决策单元的排序方法进行了完善和扩展。首先,根据CCR模型,给出了两类特殊的DEA模型,分别是仅有投入数据的DEA模型和仅有产出数据的DEA模型;其次,基于这两个模型,应用上述方法实现了对仅有投入(或产出)数据的决策单元的排序;第三,给出了排序方法中参数a的计算方法;最后,通过修正排序模型,有效提高了排序方法的计算精度。改进后的排序方法避免了两个决策单元因为相对效率值过小而不能排序的情形,其应用范围也进一步扩大。     

对DEA中有效单元排序的一种新方法

文章对数据包络分析(DEA)的强有效性问题提出了一种新的研究方法.利用有效值和负有效值来构造复合输入和输出这种方法可以实现有效决策单元的完全排序.文章还给出了新方法中模型的一些性质.最后,用两个例子来检验此方法并和其他模型的计算结果进行了比较.     

有关判断决策单元的DEA有效性的新方法的探讨

为了判断决策单元是否(弱)DEA有效并克服现有的模型及[1]中模型在解决上述问题时的不足之处,本文将讨论的新模型是由CCR模型与CCGSS模型变来的,且定理的证明不同于[1]．还讨论了文中新模型的最优解的存在性,此外,研究了所有决策单元的输入输出的变化对某决策单元有效性的影响．     

DEA有效单元排序的一种新方法

通过对DEA有效单元排序中超有效性方法的探讨,提出了一种新的方法.利用对构造模型目标函数的处理,新的方法能够实现对有效单元的完全排序.最后,通过两个算例进一步验证了新方法的可行性和优越性.     

基于虚拟决策单元的排序模型

本文给出了一种新的决策单元排序方法。基于经典的C²R模型,通过引入一个虚拟的决策单元,形成了一个新的排序模型,按照相对效率值的大小实现了决策单元的排序。实验表明,新排序方法不仅能较好地反映C²R模型的计算结果,而且可避免超效率方法造成的相对效率值偏大的弊端。新的排序方法依据充分、简单方便,同时体现了整体的决策效率。     

两个DEA的逆问题的解法的探讨

文[1]提出了两个DEA的逆问题，并用搜索法来解．而本文根据所证的定理，对每个问题一般只要解二、三个线性规划问题就能得到答案．     

系统协同发展程度的DEA评价研究

协同发展是区域经济得以顺利、快速发展的客观要求和前提条件;是持续发展基础性、前提性因素和实现手段。系统协同发展不是即生的,它是通过对原有系统不断的诊断、调整、评价,周而复始逐步实现的。对系统协同发展程度的评价是系统实现协同发展的前提、指导和路径。本借助于DEA的方法,从系统协同发展的内容上,给出“协同”和“发展”的评价方法;从系统的结构上,给出系统内和系统间的“协同”和“发展”评价方法。     

组合DEA方法与成熟度模型对项目效益的评价

为全面考虑资金、管理决策能力等因素对项目效益的影响，本运用数据包络分析与项目成熟度模型结合的方法来对企业各个项目之间的相对效益进行评价，应用结果表明该评价方法对于企业资源的最优配置、提高总体效益是十分有用的。     

成本最小问题与(弱)DEA有效性

在文[1]的基础上,本文证明了在一定条件下对所给的决策单元、其弱DEA有效性或DEA有效性能由成本最小问题的最优解来判断.     

基于DEA方法和粗糙集的政府效率评估模型

政府效率影响政府的执政能力。评价政府效率必须考虑投入和产出之间的关系。本文首先利用DEA方法建立投入一产出多指标模型评价政府工作的相对有效性，并对评价结果进行离散化处理；然后运用粗糙集方法对离散后的数据进行分析，得出每个待评对象的综合评分。两种方法的有机结合，使得建立的政府效率评价模型既能充分反映政府效率投入一产出的特点，又能有效避免人为因素对模型的影响，以得到更合理的评估结果。     

A Complete Efficiency Ranking of Decision Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis

The efficiency measures provided by DEA can be used for ranking Decision Making Units (DMUs), however, this ranking procedure does not yield relative rankings for those units with 100% efficiency. Andersen and Petersen have proposed a modified efficiency measure for efficient units which can be used for ranking, but this ranking breaks down in some cases, and can be unstable when one of the DMUs has a relatively small value for some of its inputs. This paper proposes an alternative efficiency measure, based on a different optimization problem that removes the difficulties.     

带有随机决策单元的广义数据包络分析方法

广义DEA方法是一种相对效率评价方法,解决了决策单元相对于任意参考系(样本单元集)的效率比较问题.在实际中,有时评价标准是确定的,决策单元的生产具有不确定性,有必要在进行生产之前基于确定性样本单元对随机性决策单元进行相对效率评价.为了解决这个问题,研究样本单元为确定值,决策单元为随机变量的广义DEA模型,分别通过期望值和机会约束将随机模型转化为确定性规划,给出决策单元GEDEA有效和GCDEA有效的概念,GEDEA有效与多目标规划Pareto有效关系,以及利用移动因子对决策单元进行有效性排序方法.     

Cross-ranking of Decision Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a mathematical model that evaluates the relative efficiency of Decision Making Units (DMUs) with multiple input and output. In some applications of DEA, ranking of the DMUs are important. For this purpose, a number of approaches have been introduced. Among them is the cross-efficiency method. The method utilizes the result of the cross-efficiency matrix and averages the cross-efficiency scores of each DMU. Ranking is then performed based on the average efficiency scores. In this paper, we proposed a new way of handling the information from the cross-efficiency matrix. Based on the notion that the ranking order is more important than individual efficiency score, the cross-efficiency matrix is converted to a cross-ranking matrix. A cross-ranking matrix is basically a cross-efficiency matrix with the efficiency score of each element being replaced with the ranking order of that efficiency score with respect to the other efficiency scores in a column. By so doing, each DMU assume the role of a decision maker and how they voted or ranked the other DMUs are reflected in their respective column of the cross-ranking matrix. These votes are then aggregated using a preference aggregation method to determine the overall ranking of the DMUs. Comparison with an existing cross-efficiency method indicates a relatively better result through usage of the proposed method.     

引入时间变量的数据包络分析模型

考虑到实际中的生产过程大多数都是多阶段的生产过程,而传统的数据包络分析模型只能对单阶段的生产过程进行评价.传统的数据包络分析模型在应用中的局限性很大.本文是在传统数据包络分析模型的基础上,通过引入离散的时间变量来建立对整个多阶段生产过程进行评价的数据包络分析模型.     

Fuzzy BCC Model for Data Envelopment Analysis

Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis (FDEA) is a tool for comparing the performance of a set of activities or organizations under uncertainty environment. Imprecise data in FDEA models is represented by fuzzy sets and FDEA models take the form of fuzzy linear programming models. Previous research focused on solving the FDEA model of the CCR (named after Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes) type (FCCR). In this paper, the FDEA model of the BCC (named after Banker, Charnes, and Cooper) type (FBCC) is studied. Possibility and Credibility approaches are provided and compared with an -level based approach for solving the FDEA models. Using the possibility approach, the relationship between the primal and dual models of FBCC models is revealed and fuzzy efficiency can be constructed. Using the credibility approach, an efficiency value for each DMU (Decision Making Unit) is obtained as a representative of its possible range. A numerical example is given to illustrate the proposed approaches and results are compared with those obtained with the -level based approach.     

A Semi-Infinite Programming Model In Data Envelopment Analysis

We consider a model for data envelopment analysis with infinitely many decision-making units. The determination of the relative efficiency of a given decision-making unit amounts to the solution of a semi-infinite optimization problem. We show that a decision-making unit of maximal relative efficiency exists and that it is 100% efficient. Moreover, this decision-making unit can be found by calculating a zero of the semi-infinite constraint function. For the latter task we propose a bi-level algorithm. We apply this algorithm to a problem from chemical engineering and present numerical results     

A Special Algorithm for an Additive Model in Data Envelopment Analysis

A special algorithm is presented for the additive model in data envelopment analysis (DEA). The special algorithm first classifies a data set into several subsets. Then the subset is solved by a different algorithmic framework. In simulation studies, the algorithm outperformed available DEA codes. The proposed algorithm can efficiently deal with a large data set.     

基于样本评价的广义数据包络分析方法

传统DEA方法是一种依据自评体系评价的方法,而无法自主选择参照系.为了解决DEA方法可以同时依据自评体系和其它参照系进行评价问题,首先给出了广义DEA有效的概念.然后,给出了一类基于样本单元评价的广义数据包络分析模型,包括面向输入的广义DEA模型、面向输出的广义DEA模型以及加性广义DEA模型.最后,分析了上述这些模型与传统DEA模型之间的关系,探讨了广义DEA有效与相应多目标规划Pareto有效之间的关系,并给出了决策单元的投影性质以及决策单元的有效性排序方法.