Accreditation of reference material producers: Let's get it right!

The accreditation of testing and calibration laboratories to ISO/IEC 17025 is increasingly calling for the accreditation of reference material (RM) producers. Two international guides, ISO Guide 34 (2000) " General requirements for the competence of reference material producers" issued by the ISO Committee on Reference Materials and ILAC-G 12 " Guidelines for the requirements for the competence of reference material producers" issued by the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC), are already in use for this purpose. Recently however initiatives have been launched to accredit RM producers to ISO 17025 as calibration laboratories and it has been suggested that a combination of ISO/IEC 17025 " General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories" and ISO Guide 34 may be the best option. This publication is an expression of the position of the ISO Committee on Reference Materials (ISO/REMCO) on the standards and guides currently in use in the accreditation of RM producers. The paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of these standards and guides from the perspective of benefit to RM producers and RM users. In conclusion, the use of ISO Guide 34 alone or in combination with ILAC-G 12 is the preferred system for the accreditation of RM producers. Therefore ISO/REMCO strongly encourages all accreditation bodies to adopt ISO Guide 34.     

Certification of reference materials and accreditation of reference material producers: Questionable terminology leads to confusion

In the view of the Deutscher Kalibrierdienst (DKD) , a certifying body for reference materials can be considered to be a calibration laboratory. Therefore, accreditation of calibration laboratories in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025 is the most appropriate way to establish confidence in certificates for reference materials. If necessary, the criteria of ISO/IEC 17025 can be tailored to specific cases. There is no need to provide any new kind of reference-material specific accreditation. However, in view of the variety of reference materials and the practice existing in other countries, accreditation of testing laboratories and product certification bodies may optionally be acceptable as long as the same stringent principles with respect to traceability and measurement uncertainty are applied. Such accreditations but not accreditations of reference material producers (ISO Guide 34) are also covered by existing international mutual recognition arrangements (MRA).     

Accreditation of reference material producers: an Australian perspective

The National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia has operated an accreditation program for reference material producers since 1997 with accreditation now being offered to ISO Guide 34 (2000). This paper discusses the benefits and disadvantages to both the producers and the users of reference materials (testing laboratories) and their clients of a formal system of third-party accreditation of reference material producers. The merits of using ISO Guide 34 (2000) rather than ISO/IEC 17025 as the core standard in the accreditation process are discussed.     

Use of ISO Guides 25, 30, 31, 34, 35, and 9001 in re-engineering Bethlehem Steel Corporation's analytical chemistry reference materials program

 Many certified reference materials are needed to calibrate and control analytical measurement processes in integrated steel works. It is beyond the scope and capacity of most national laboratories to supply all of these needs. Yet, the demand for these materials is steadily increasing as more steel producers update their quality systems in preparation for ISO 9000 registration and/or ISO Guide 25 laboratory accreditation assessments. This paper describes how the Bethlehem Steel Corporation updated its reference materials program to meet its internal needs and offers a model for use by others in improving their programs. Received: 22 April 1998 · Accepted: 12 May 1998     

Laboratory accreditation in Italy for reference solution production of sucrose in water

The accreditation of Chemifarm srl laboratory for the calibration of two characteristics on the same aqueous solution has been achieved. The process has been executed by the Italian accreditation body for calibration laboratories (SIT). This is the first example of a producer of certified reference solutions in Italy. The solutions are mixtures of sucrose in water at several concentrations and are characterised for refractive index in the range of 1.33299 to 1.38115 and for mass fraction of sucrose in the range of 0 to 30 (commercially expressed in Brix degrees). Both traceability paths, obtained through refractometric and gravimetric methods, are reported. Furthermore, the paper describes the approach adopted to match the criteria based on ISO Guide 34 and ILAC-G 12, the documents with requirements for certified reference material producers, in compliance with those of ISO/IEC 17025, the norm for the laboratory accreditation.     

Guidance on the contents of accompanying documentation for reference materials (RMs)

The use of reference materials (RMs) is a key activity for the improvement and maintenance of a worldwide coherent measurement system. As detailed in ISO Guide 33, RMs with different characteristics are used in measurement processes, for the purpose of precision control, bias assessment, calibration, assigning values to other materials, and maintaining conventional scales, to name a few. For the establishment of metrological traceability of measurement results to international scales or other measurement standards, proper use of certified reference materials (CRMs) is essential. From the perspective of a reference material producer, the documentation that is provided with an RM is the value-adding component of the material; for the user, the document is critical for the correct implementation and use of the RM in the measurement process. The ISO Committee on Reference Materials (ISO/REMCO) recognised the importance of the documentation that accompanies a reference material as early as 1981 when the first edition of ISO Guide 31 was published. The third edition of the Guide that was published recently considers the appropriate accompanying documentation for all types of reference materials, i.e. CRMs and non-certified RMs.     

The Japanese traceability system and the role of uncertainty evaluation in measurement

 The new traceability system of measurement standards based on the Japanese Measurement Law has been established since November 1993. Some reference materials such as metal standard solutions, pH standard solutions and standard gas mixtures are included in the system together with relevant physical quantities. In this system, primary measurement standard instruments or primary reference materials are designated by the regulation for each quantity. For the practical dissemination of each quantity, accreditation of calibration bodies is recognized by the steering committee under the supervision of the government. In the course of assessment of a candidate calibration body, the concepts of ISO/IEC Guide 25 and ISO/IEC Guide 58 are effectively introduced. For the estimation of reliability, the concept of how to introduce the statistical approach is effectively considered. The method of uncertainty evaluation described in the ISO document entitled "Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement" is adopted.     

Development and supply system of reference materials based on the Measurement Law in Japan

 Analytical instruments used for measurements of air and water pollution are calibrated by using reference materials such as standard gases and standard solutions. In Japan, since the middle of the 1970s, those reference materials which are traceable to the national standards maintained at national research institutes have been supplied to users by reference material producers. In order to establish the primary standards and to secure the traceability from the working standards to the national ones, various analytical methods such as coulometric, titrimetric and gravimetric analyses for purity determination and highly sensitive atomic spectrometry for trace analysis have been developed as the primary methods and reference methods. The Japanese Measurement Law, revised in 1992, has introduced a new traceability system in which a public organization, a "designated calibration body", can also prepare and maintain the national standards under the advice and instruction of national research institutes. The designated calibration body can provide calibration services to reference material producers (accredited calibration bodies) by using the national standards. The reference materials supplied in conformity with the traceability system include standard gases, pH standard solutions, metal standard solutions and non-metal ion standard solutions. Received: 4 October 1996 Accepted: 2 December 1996     

Reference materials – a view from a small country

ISO/IEC 17025 has an increased emphasis on traceability and estimation of uncertainty of measurement compared with ISO Guide 25. Demonstration of traceability is a new concept in analytical chemistry and depends on access to relevant reference materials or use of reference methods. Until now most reference materials used in New Zealand have been imported, because they offered international comparability. New Zealand is currently starting to develop the required infrastructure so that it will be able to produce unique reference materials that will contribute to the total international effort in improving the reliability of analytical chemistry. Received: 12 October 2000 / Revised: 18 January 2001 / Accepted: 23 January 2001     

The third edition of ISO Guide 34: what were the drivers for the revision and what is new?

After the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) had taken in 2004, the resolution to conduct accreditation of producers of reference materials according to ISO Guide 34 ‘General requirements for the competence of reference material producers’ in combination with ISO/IEC 17025 ‘General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories’, ISO/REMCO, the ISO Committee on Reference Materials, decided in 2005 to revise ISO Guide 34 to align it closer with ISO/IEC 17025 and to clarify certain issues for accreditors and producers seeking accreditation without adding new requirements. Moreover, the publication in 2007 of ISO/IEC Guide 99 ‘International vocabulary of metrology—Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM)’ triggered additional adaptations of the guide.     

Traceable property values of in-house reference materials

The traceability of in-house reference materials (IHRM) is discussed. It is shown that a systematic error in results of a measured value, specific to a measurement method or to a laboratory developing an IHRM, can be overcome if a comparative approach to IHRM characterization is used. A traceability chain of the value carried by the IHRM to the value carried by the reference material with higher metrological status and sufficiently similar matrix (for example, a certified reference material – CRM according to ISO Guide 30) is helpful in such a case. The chain is realized when the IHRM samples are analysed simultaneously with the CRM samples under the same conditions. This and other traceability chains necessary for the IHRM development are examined as the measurement information sources.     

New ISO Guide 34 – How is the change affecting practice in the Czech Republic?

 The positive contribution of the ISO Guide 34 review is the idea of increasing responsibility of reference materials producers. The change of the main intention introduces some problems related to national legislation. There is a very important discussion going on about these problems among metrological bodies, accreditation institutes, reference material producers and laboratories.     

Accreditation of reference material producers

 The use of reference materials is the most pragmatic means by which the analyst can achieve comparability of data. Reference material producers therefore need to have adequate quality systems in place for ensuring the reliability of their materials. In order to provide guidance to both producers and assessors, ISO Guide 34 has recently been produced detailing the quality system requirements for the production of reference materials. CITAC, REMCO and ILAC are now collaborating in the revision of this guide to produce a free-standing document detailing the general requirements for the competence of reference material producers. This paper discusses some of the more important issues described in these documents. The possible formation of an international register containing details of a reference material producer's quality system status is also discussed.     

Accreditation: worth the trouble?

 Since the late 1980s, much attention has been paid to the usefulness of ISO-9000 certification. At present more than 45000 companies and institutions worldwide have been granted an ISO-9000 certificate. In the field of quality assurance, however, the ISO-9000 series does not completely cover the aspect of traceability. Demonstrable traceability is a particular problem in quality assurance of products by chemical analysis. In this paper realisation of demonstrable traceability is discussed, using the field of gas analysis as an example. Attention is focused on the usefulness of accreditation for laboratories performing quality assurance analyses. The basic question is asked whether and, if so, when accreditation is worth the trouble in cases where demonstrable traceability is required. Received: 15 February 1996 Accepted: 6 March 1996     

Implementation of ISO Guide 34: Accreditation for reference material production

The National Analytical Reference Laboratory of the Australian Government Analytical Laboratories was initially accredited to ILAC Guide G 12:2000 in January 2000 and is currently accredited to ISO Guide 34 (2000) for the production of a range of pure organic substance reference materials. This paper discusses the practical challenges and rewards of developing and implementing a quality system for reference material production and discusses some of the barriers, and potential solutions, to more general implementation of third-party accreditation.     

Compliance with GLP standards and management in analytical laboratories: current status

 Analytical laboratories in Japan, operating more often as departments within a company than as independent contractors, have to contend with different good laboratory practice (GLP) standards. Problems also occur in the analytical laboratories which must comply with GLP, good manufacturing practice (GMP) and good clinical practice (GCP) regulations within the same facility. The status of these GLP-complied analytical laboratories is reviewed with regard to assurance program, validation method, laboratory information management, and security systems. The differences in the responsible authorities and scopes under the six GLPs are also briefly described. Analytical tests in GLP are not itemized as a test for accreditation. Therefore, the accreditation of analytical laboratories in Japan is currently granted as a part of ISO 9000 approvals. Received: 27 September 1996 Accepted: 11 November 1996     

对新版ISO导则34的理解

标准物质在实现测量结果溯源性以及不同时空测量结果的可比性方面具有广泛的应用。面对标准物质需求的不断增长和标准物质生产者数量的不断增加,新版ISO导则34：2009《标准物质生产者能力的通用要求》于2009年发布,以在促进该领域研究发展的同时,确保各种不同来源标准物质的质量。针对新版ISO导则34所涉及的相关名词术语以及一些重要原则进行了讨论,以促进对该导则的理解和在我国的推广应用。     

Accreditation of reference material producers: the example of IRMM's Reference Materials Unit

The potential approaches for third-party assessment of reference material producers are revisited and the activities of the Reference Materials (RM) Unit of the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) to obtain accreditation to ISO Guide 34 and ISO 17025 are described. Accreditation was related to the Unit as all matrix RM activities of the institute are concentrated there. A management system was established that allows sufficient flexibility to be applicable to a wide range of RMs while being precise enough to ensure compliance with ISO Guides 30, 31 and especially 34 and 35. Accreditation was achieved in 2004 with independent scopes for testing and RM production and was confirmed and extended in 2005. The key aspects of the RM Unit's management system for RM production are presented. Presented at BERM-10, April 2006, Charleston, SC, USA     

Outline for the revision of ISO Guide 35

The production of reference materials (RMs) is a key activity for the improvement and maintenance of a worldwide coherent measurement system. As detailed in ISO Guide 33, RMs with different characteristics are used in measurements, such as calibration, quality control and method validation, as well as for the assignment of values to other materials. Currently, ISO Guide 35 is in its third edition after it was revised in 2006. The Guide was developed to support best practices in the value assignment to specified properties of Certified Reference Materials (CRMs). This Guide gives general guidance and explains concepts to assist the understanding and development of valid methods to assign values to the properties of a reference material, including the evaluation of their associated measurement uncertainties, and the establishment of their metrological traceability. From the outcome of a systematic review of ISO Guide 35 among the members of ISO/REMCO, the ISO Committee on Reference Materials, it followed that there is a need for revising the current edition of ISO Guide 35. The mandate for the revision is focused on editorial updates to explain the concepts in more detail. It is not envisaged that major technical changes will be introduced. This paper explains the approach and rationale for the revision of ISO Guide 35 and invites comments from the users of the current edition of ISO Guide 35.