A remark on the tail probability of a distribution

Let {X_n}_n≥1 be a sequence of independent and identically distributed random variables. For each integer n ≥ 1 and positive constants r, t, and ?, let S_n = Σ_j=1ⁿX_j and $\text{E{N}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(r, t, ?)} = Σ}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{r?2}}\text{P{|S}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{| > ?n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>r</mtext><mtext>t</mtext>}}\text{}}$. In this paper, we prove that (1) lim_?→0+?^α(r?1)E{N_∞(r, t, ?)} = K(r, t) if E(X₁) = 0, Var(X₁) = 1, and E(| X₁ |^t) < ∞, where 2 ≤ t < 2r ≤ 2t, $\text{K(r, t) =}\text{{2}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>\alpha (r?1)</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{Γ(}\text{(1 + α(r ? 1))}\text{2}\text{)}}\text{{(r ? 1) Γ(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{)}}$, and $\text{α =}\text{2t}\text{(2r ? t)}$; (2) $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{?\to 0+}}\text{G(t, ?)}\text{H(t, ?)}\text{= 0}$ if 2 < t < 4, E(X₁) = 0, Var(X₁) > 0, and E(|X₁|^t) < ∞, where G(t, ?) = E{N_∞(t, t, ?)} = Σ_n=1^∞n^t?2P{| S_n | > ?n} → ∞ as ? → 0+ and $\text{H(t, ?) = E{N}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(t, t, ?)} = Σ}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{t?2}}\text{P{| S}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{| > ?n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>2</mtext><mtext>t</mtext>}}\text{} → ∞}\text{as}\text{? → 0+}$, i.e., H(t, ?) goes to infinity much faster than G(t, ?) as ? → 0+ if 2 < t < 4, E(X₁) = 0, Var(X₁) > 0, and E(| X₁ |^t) < ∞. Our results provide us with a much better and deeper understanding of the tail probability of a distribution.     

On the absolute continuity of Schrödinger operators with spherically symmetric,long-range potentials,II

Let H = ?Δ + V, where the potential V is spherically symmetric and can be decomposed as a sum of a short-range and a long-range term, V(r) = V_S(r) + V_L. Let λ = lim sup_r→∞V_L(r) < ∞ (we allow λ = ? ∞) and set λ⁺ = max(λ, 0). Assume that for some r₀, V_L(r) ?C^2k(r₀, ∞) and that there exists δ > 0 such that $\text{(}\text{d}\text{dr}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{j}}\text{V}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(r) · (λ}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{? V}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(r) + 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{= O(r}{}^{\mathrm{?j\delta }}\text{), j = 1,…, 2k,}\text{as}\text{r → ∞}$. Assume further that $\text{∝}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(}\text{dr}\text{¦ V}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(r)¦}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{) = ∞}$ and that 2kδ > 1. It is shown that: (a) The restriction of H to C^∞(Rⁿ) is essentially self-adjoint, (b) The essential spectrum of H contains the closure of (λ, ∞). (c) The part of H over (λ, ∞) is absolutely continuous.     

Monotone Splitting of matrices

Given the iterative scheme xⁱ⁺¹ = BTxⁱ + r where B, T are fixed n×:n real matrices, r a fixed real n-vector and xⁱ a real n-vector we investigate the convergence and monotonicity of schemes of the type

$\text{v}{}^{\mathrm{i+1}}\text{w}{}^{\mathrm{i+1}}\text{=}\text{B}\text{O}\text{O}\text{B}\text{S}{}_{11}\text{?S}{}_{12}\text{?S}{}_{21}\text{S}{}_{22}\text{v}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{w}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{+}\text{r}\text{r}$

, where S_ij are n×:n real matrices related to T. The n-vector iterates vⁱ,wⁱ bracket in a certain sense solutions x of x = BTx + r. We also give necessary and sufficient conditions for the monotonicity of the original iterative scheme itself xⁱ⁺¹ = BTxⁱ + r. This leads to monotonici results for classical iterative schemes such as the Jacobi, Gauss-Seidel, and successive overrelaxation methods.     

A new form of trigonometric orthogonality and Gaussian-type quadrature

Gauss's (2n+1)-point trigonometric interpolation formula, based upon f(x_i), i = 1(1)2n+1, gives a trigonometric sum of the n^th order, S_2n+1(x = a₀ + ∑_jⁿ = 1^(a_jcos jx + b_jsin jx), which may be integrated to provide formulas for either direct quadrature or stepwise integration of differential equations having periodic (or near-periodic) solutions. An “orthogonal” trigonometric sum S_2r+1(x) is one that satisfies

$\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{a}}{}^{\mathrm{b}}\text{S}{}_{\mathrm{2r+1}}\text{(x)S}{}_{\mathrm{2r\prime +1}}\text{(x)dx=0, r′<r}$

and two other arbitrarily imposable conditions needed to make S_2r1(x) unique. Two proofs are given of a fundamental factor theorem for any S_2n+1(x) (somewhat different from that for polynomials) from which we derive 2r-point Gaussian-type quadrature formulas, r = [n/2] + 1, which are exact for any S_4r?1(x). We have

$\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{a}}{}^{\mathrm{b}}\text{S}{}_{\mathrm{4r?1(x)}}\text{dx=∑}{}_{\mathrm{j=1}}{}^{\mathrm{2r}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{S}{}_{\mathrm{4r?1}}\text{(x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{)}$

where the nodes x_j, j = 1(1)2r, are the zeros of the orthogonal S_2r+1(x). It is proven that A_j > 0 and that 2r-1 of the nodes must lie within the interval [a,b], and the remaining node (which may or may not be in [a,b]) must be real. Unlike Legendre polynomials, any [a′,b′] other than a translation of [a,b], requires different and unrelated sets of nodes and weights. Gaussian-type quadrature formulas are applicable to the numerical integration of the Gauss (2n+1)-point interpolation formulas, with extra efficiency when the latter are expressed in barycentric form. S_2r+1(x), x_jandA_j, j = 1(1)2r, were calculated for [a,b] = [0, π/4], 2r = 2 and 4, to single-precision accuracy.     

Extension de quelques theoremes sur les densites de series d'elements de n a des series de sous-ensembles finis de n

For a sequence A = {A_k} of finite subsets of N we introduce: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, where A(m) is the number of subsets A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}.The collection of all subsets of {1, …, n} together with the operation $\text{a ∪ b, (a ∩ b), (a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b)}$ constitutes a finite semi-group N^∪ (semi-group N^∩) (group $\text{N}{}^1$). For N^∪, N^∩ we prove analogues of the Erdös-Landau theorem: δ(A+B) ? δ(A)(1+(2λ)^?1(1?δ(A>))), where B is a base of N of the average order λ. We prove for $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ analogues of Schnirelmann's theorem (that δ(A) + δ(B) > 1 implies δ(A + B) = 1) and the inequalities λ ? 2h, where h is the order of the base.We introduce the concept of divisibility of subsets: a|b if b is a continuation of a. We prove an analog of the Davenport-Erdös theorem: if d(A) > 0, then there exists an infinite sequence {A_kr}, where A_kr | A_kr+1 for r = 1, 2, …. In Section 6 we consider for $\text{N∪, N∩, N1}$ analogues of Rohrbach inequality: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, where g(n) = min k over the subsets {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n}, such that every m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} can be expressed as m = a_i + a_j.Pour une série A = {A_k} de sous-ensembles finis de N on introduit les densités: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ où A(m) est le nombre d'ensembles A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}. L'ensemble de toutes les parties de {1, 2, …, n} devient, pour les opérations $\text{a ∪ b, a ∩ b, a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b}$, un semi-groupe fini N^∪, N^∩ ou un groupe N¹ respectivement. Pour N^∪, N^∩ on démontre l'analogue du théorème de Erdös-Landau: δ(A + B) ? δ(A)(1 + (2λ)^?1(1?δ(A))), où B est une base de N d'ordre moyen λ. On démontre pour $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ l'analogue du théorème de Schnirelmann (si δ(A) + δ(B) > 1, alors δ(A + B) = 1) et les inégalités λ ? 2h, où h est l'ordre de base. On introduit le rapport de divisibilité des enembles: a|b, si b est une continuation de a. On démontre l'analogue du théorème de Davenport-Erdös: si d(A) > 0, alors il existe une sous-série infinie {A_kr}, où A_kr|A_kr+1, pour r = 1, 2, … . Dans le Paragraphe 6 on envisage pour N^∪, $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ les analogues de l'inégalité de Rohrbach: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, où g(n) = min k pour les ensembles {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n} tels que pour tout m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} on a m = a_i + a_j.     

On a geometrical method of construction of maximal t-linearly independent sets

The problem of constructing a maximal t-linearly independent set in V(r; s) (called a maximal L_t(r, s)-set in this paper) is a very important one (called a packing problem) concerning a fractional factorial design and an error correcting code where V(r; s) is an r-dimensional vector space over a Galois field GF(s) and s is a prime or a prime power. But it is very difficult to solve it and attempts made by several research workers have been successful only in special cases.In this paper, we introduce the concept of a {Σ_α=1^kw_α, m; t, s}-min · hyper with weight (w₁, w₂,…, w_k) and using this concept and the structure of a finite projective geometry PG(n ? 1, s), we shall give a geometrical method of constructing a maximal L_t(t + r, s)-set with length t + r + n for any integers r, n, and s such that n ? 3, n ? 1 ? r₀ ? n + s ? 2 and r₁ ? 1, where r = (r₁ + 1)v_n?1 ? r₀ and $\text{v}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{=}\text{(s}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{? 1)}\text{(s ? 1)}$.     

On the absolute continuity of Schrödinger operators with spherically symmetric,long-range potentials,I

Let H = ?Δ + V, where the potential V is spherically symmetric and can be decomposed as a sum of a short-range and a long-range term, V(r) = V_S(r) + V_L(r). Assume that for some r₀, V_L(r) ?C^2k(r₀, ∞) and that there exist μ > 0, δ > 0, such that $\text{(}\text{d}\text{dr}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{j}}\text{V}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>L</mtext>}}\text{(r) = O(r}{}^{\mathrm{?\mu ?j\delta }}\text{)}\text{as}\text{r → ∞, 1 ? j ? 2k}$. Assume further that min(2kμ, (2k ? 1)δ + μ) > 1. Under this weak decay condition on V_L(r) it is shown in this paper that the positive spectrum of H is absolutely continuous and that the absolutely continuous part of H is unitarily equivalent to ?Δ, provided that the singularity of V at 0 is properly restricted. In particular, some oscillation of V_L(r) at infinity is allowed.     

Harmonic analysis on hyperboloids

The regular representation of O(n, N) acting on $\text{L}{}^2\text{(}\text{O(n, N)}\text{O(n, N ? 1)}\text{)}$ is decomposed into a direct integral of irreducible representations. The homogeneous space $\text{O(n, N)}\text{O(n, N ? 1)}$ is realized as the Hyperboloid $\text{H = {(x, t) ? R}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; N}}\text{: ¦ t ¦}{}^2\text{? ¦ x ¦}{}^2\text{= 1}}$. The problem is essentially equivalent to finding the spectral resolution of a certain self-adjoint invariant differential operator □_h on H, which is the tangential part of the operator □ = Δ_x ? Δ_t on R^{n + N}. The spectrum of □_h contains a discrete part (except when N = 1) with eigenfunctions generated by restricting to H solutions of □u = 0 which vanish in the region $\text{¦ t ¦ < ¦ x ¦}$, and a continuous part $\text{H}$_?. As a representation of O(n, N), $\text{H}$_? ⊕ $\text{H}$_? is unitarily equivalent to the regular representation on L² of the cone $\text{{(x, t) : ¦ x ¦}{}^2\text{= ¦ t ¦}{}^2\text{}}$, and the intertwining operator is obtained by solving the equation □u = 0 with given boundary values on the cone. Explicit formulas are given for the spectral decomposition. The special case n = N = 2 gives the Plancherel formula for SL(2, R).     

On the probability that k positive integers are relatively prime II

Given a set S of positive integers let $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t)}$ denote the number of k-tuples 〈m₁, …, m_k〉 for which $\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{∈ S ? [1, t]}$ and (m₁, …, m_k) = 1. Also let $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n)}$ denote the probability that k integers, chosen at random from $\text{S ? [1, n]}$, are relatively prime. It is shown that if P = {p₁, …, p_r} is a finite set of primes and S = {m : (m, p₁ … p_r) = 1}, then $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{\nu ?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) + O(t}{}^{\mathrm{k?1}}\text{)}$ if k ≥ 3 and $\text{Z}{}_2{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^2\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^2\text{) + O(t}\text{log}\text{t)}$ where d(S) denotes the natural density of S. From this result it follows immediately that $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) = (ζ(k))}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p\in P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ as n → ∞. This result generalizes an earlier result of the author's where $\text{P = ?}$ and S is then the whole set of positive integers. It is also shown that if S = {p₁^x₁ … p_r^x_r : x_i = 0, 1, 2,…}, then $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → 0}$ as n → ∞.     

Families of finite sets in which no set is covered by the union of two others

Let f^k(n) denote the maximum of k-subsets of an n-set satisfying the condition in the title. It is proven that f^{2t ? 1}(n) ? f^2t(n + 1) ? $\text{(}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{(}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{2t?1}}\text{)}$ with equalities holding iff there exists a Steiner-system S(t, 2t ? 1, n). The bounds are approximately best possile for k ? 6 and of correct order of magnitude for k >/ 7, as well, even if the corresponding Steiner-systems do not exist.Exponential lower and upper bounds are obtained for the case if we do not put size restrictions on the members of the family (i.e., the nonuniform case).     

Brownian motion,Lp properties of Schrödinger operators and the localization of binding

We use Brownian motion ideas to study Schrödinger operators $\text{H =}\text{built?1}\text{2}\text{Δ + V}\text{on}\text{L}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{(R}{}^{\mathrm{v}}\text{)}$. In particular: (a) We prove that lim_t→∞t^?1In ∥ e^?tH ∥_p,p is p-independent for a very large class of V's where ∥ A ∥_p,p = norm of A as an operator from L^pto L^p. (b) For v ? 3 and $\text{V ? L}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>v</mtext><mtext>2\; ?\; ?</mtext>}}\text{∩ L}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>v</mtext><mtext>2\; +\; ?</mtext>}}$, we show that sup ∥ e^?tH ∥_∞,∞ < ∞ if and only if H has no negative eigenvalues or zero energy resonances. (c) We relate the “localization of binding” recently noted by Sigal to Brownian hitting probabilities.     

Delayed random walks

A delayed random walk $\text{{S}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{, n ≥ 0}}$ is defined here as a partial sum process of independent random variables in which the first N summands (N optional) are distributed F¹,…,F_N, respectively, while all remaining summands are distributed F₀, where {F_k, _k ≥ 0} is a sequence of proper distribution functions on the real line. Delayed random walks arise naturally in the study of certain generalized single server queues. This paper examines optional times of the process such as $\text{π = inf {n: n ≥ 1 and S}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{≥ 0}}$. Conditions insuring the finiteness of E {π} and E {π²} are obtained, generating functions calculated, and illustrative examples given. The bivariate functions $\text{E{r}{}^{\mathrm{\pi }}\text{explsqbitS}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{\pi }}\text{rsqb}}$ and $\text{E {}\text{∑}\text{n=0}\text{π?1}\text{explsqbitS}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{rsqb}}$ are studied for the case where N ≡ 1.     

An integral operator connected with the Helmholtz equation

Let Lu be the integral operator defined by $\text{(L}{}_{\mathrm{k?}}\text{)(x, y) = ∝ s ∝ ?(x′, y′)(}\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{ik?}}\text{?}\text{) dx′ dy′, (x, y) ? S}$ where S is the interior of a smooth, closed Jordan curve in the plane, k is a complex number with Re k ? 0, Im k ? 0, and ?² = (x ?x′)² + (y ? y′)². We define $\text{q(x, y) = [}\text{dist}\text{((x, y), ?S)]}\text{1}\text{2}\text{, (x, y) ? S; L}{}_2\text{(q, S) = {? : ∝ s ∝ ¦ ?(x, y)¦}{}^2\text{q(x, y) dx dy < ∞}; W}{}_2{}^1\text{(q, S) = {? : ? ? L}{}_2\text{(q, S),}\text{??}\text{?x}\text{,}\text{?f}\text{?y}\text{? L}{}_2\text{(q, S)}}$, where in the definition of W₂¹(q, S) the derivatives are taken in the sense of distributions. We prove that L_k is a continuous 1-l mapping of L₂(q, S) onto W₂¹(q, S).     

Radial bounds for perturbations of elliptic operators

Elliptic operators $\text{A = ∑}{}_{\mathrm{¦\alpha ¦\; ?\; m}}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) D}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}$, α a multi-index, with leading term positive and constant coefficient, and with lower order coefficients defined on $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mi\; mathvariant="italic"\; is="true">n</mi>}}$ or a quotient space $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{U}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{, U}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{? R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ are considered. It is shown that the L^p-spectrum of A is contained in a “parabolic region” Ω of the complex plane enclosing the positive real axis, uniformly in p. Outside Ω, the kernel of the resolvent of A is shown to be uniformly bounded by an L¹ radial convolution kernel. Some consequences are: A can be closed in all L^p (1 ? p ? ∞), and is essentially self-adjoint in L² if it is symmetric; A generates an analytic semigroup e^?tA in the right half plane, strongly L^p and pointwise continuous at t = 0. A priori estimates relating the leading term and remainder are obtained, and summability $\text{φ(εA)?→}{}_{\mathrm{\epsilon \; \to \; 0}}\text{φ(0) ?}$, with φ analytic, is proved for $\text{? ? L}{}^{\mathrm{p}}$, with convergence in L^p and on the Lebesgue set of ?. More comprehensive summability results are obtained when A has constant coefficients.     

The Dirichlet problem for the Kohn Laplacian on the Heisenberg group,II

Let L = ∑_{j = 1}^mX_j² be sum of squares of vector fields in $\text{R}$ⁿ satisfying a Hörmander condition of order 2: span{X_j, [X_i, X_j]} is the full tangent space at each point. A point x??D of a smooth domain D is characteristic if X₁,…, X_m are all tangent to ?D at x. We prove sharp estimates in non-isotropic Lipschitz classes for the Dirichlet problem near (generic) isolated characteristic points in two special cases: (a) The Grushin operator $\text{?}{}^2\text{?x}{}^2\text{+ x}{}^2\text{?}{}^2\text{?t}{}^2$ in $\text{R}$². (b) The real part of the Kohn Laplacian on the Heisenberg group $\text{∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; ?\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(}\text{?}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ 2y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{)}{}^2\text{+ (}\text{?}\text{?y}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{? 2x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{)}{}^2$ in $\text{R}$^{2n + 1}. In contrast to non-characteristic points, C^∞ regularity may fail at a characteristic point. The precise order of regularity depends on the shape of ?D at x.     

The covering problem for the fields Q(−1)12 and Q(−3)12

Let k be a positive square free integer, $\text{N(?k)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ the ring of algebraic integers in $\text{Q(?k)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ and S the unit sphere in C_n, complex n-space. If A₁,…, A_n are n linearly independent points of C_n then L = {u₁Au + … + u_nA_n} with $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{∈ N(?k)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ is called a k-lattice. The determinant of L is denoted by d(L). If L is a covering lattice for S, then $\text{θ(S, L) =}\text{V(S)}\text{d(L)}$ is the covering density. L is called locally (absolutely) extreme if θ(S, L) is a local (absolute) minimum. In this paper we determine unique classes of extreme lattices for k = 1 and k = 3.     

Levy's stochastic area formula in higher dimensions

Let (W_t) = (W¹_t,W²_t,…,W^d_t), d ? 2, be a d-dimensional standard Brownian motion and let A(t) be a bounded measurable function from $\text{R}$⁺ into the space of d × d skew-symmetric matrices and x(t) such a function into $\text{R}$^d. A class of stochastic processes (L_t^A,x), a particular example of which is Levy's “stochastic area” $\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{=}\text{1}\text{2}\text{∝}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{?t}}\text{(W}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{,dW}{}^2{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{? W}{}^2{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{,dW}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{)}$, is dealt with.The joint characteristic function of W_t and L₁^A,x is calculated and based on this result a formula for fundamental solutions for the hypoelliptic operators which generate the diffusions (W_t,L_t^A,x) is given.     

The approximation of flows

Let U, V be two strongly continuous one-parameter groups of bounded operators on a Banach space $\text{X}$ with corresponding infinitesimal generators S, T. We prove the following: ∥U_t, ? V_t ∥ = O(t), t → 0, if and only if U = V; ∥U_t ? V_t∥ = O(t^α), t → 0; with 0 ? α ? 1, if and only if $\text{S = Ω(T + P)Ω}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$, where Ω, P, are bounded operators on $\text{X}$ such that $\text{∥U}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{Ω ? ΩU}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{∥ = O(t}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{), ∥U}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{P ? PU}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{∥ = ?O(t}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{), t → 0; ∥U}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{? V}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{∥ = O(t)}$ if and only if $\text{S}{}^1\text{? T}{}^1$ has a bounded extension to $\text{X}$¹. Further results of this nature are inferred for semigroups, reflexive spaces, Hilbert spaces, and von Neumann algebras.     

Factorization of fredholm operators on analytic functions

Let Ω be a simply connected domain in the complex plane, and $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$, the space of functions which are defined and analytic on $\text{Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, if K is the operator on elements $\text{u(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{of}\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of the kernels k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by is the identity operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, then the operator I ? K may be factored in the form (I ? K)(M ? W) = (I ? ΠK)(M ? ΠW). Here, W is an operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of a kernel w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by Wu = ∝_an^tw(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠW is the operator; ΠWu = ∝_{an ? 1}w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠK is the operator; ΠKu = ∑_{i = 1}^{n ? 1} ∝_ai^tk_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) ds + ∝_{an ? 1}^tk_n(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. The operator M is of the form m(t, a₁, …, a_n)I, where $\text{m ? A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ and maps elements of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ into itself by multiplication. The function m is uniquely derived from K in the following manner. The operator K defines an operator $\text{K}{}^1$ on functions u in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$, by . A determinant $\text{δ(I ? K}{}^1\text{)}$ of the operator $\text{I ? K}{}^1$ is defined as an element $\text{m}{}^1\text{(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$. This is mapped into $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ by setting a_{n + 1} = t to give m(t, a₁, …, a_n). The operator I ? ΠK may be factored in similar fashion, giving rise to a chain factorization of I ? K. In some cases all the matrix kernels k_i defining K are separable in the sense that k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) = P_i(t, a₁, …, a_n) Q_i(s, a₁, …, a_n), where P_i is a 1 × p_i matrix and Q_i is a p_i × 1 matrix, each with elements in $\text{A(Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, explicit formulas are given for the kernels of the factors W. The various results are stated in a form allowing immediate extension to the vector-matrix case.