Characterization, Crystal Structure and Initial DNA Binding Interaction of Two Cu（Ⅱ） Complexes with 4,5-Diazafluoren-9-one

Two new complexes [Cu（dafo）2（en）]（ClO4）2·2H2O （en=NH2CH2CH2NH2） 1 and [Cu（dafo）2（dap）]（ClO4）2·2H2O [dap=NH2CH2CH（CH3）NH2] 2 （dafo=4,5-diazafluoren-9-one） have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, IR and UV spectra. Meanwhile, the complex 1 has been characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. The initial DNA binding interactions of the complexes 1 and 2 have been investigated by UV spectra, emission spectra and cyclic voltammogram. Concluding the results of three methods used to measure the interaction of complexes 1 and 2 with DNA, the action mode of the two complexes with DNA is intercalation, and character of ligands and steric effect may affect the interaction of the complexes with DNA.     

4,5‐Di­azafluoren‐9‐one benzoyl­hydrazone monohydrate

The title compound, C₁₈H₁₂N₄O·H₂O, adopts the keto tautomeric form and the azomethine C=N double bond is in the E configuration. The dihedral angle between the planes of the di­aza­fluorene moiety and the phenyl ring is 11.3 (1)°. In the solid state, the mol­ecules form infinite chain‐like structures via O—H?N hydrogen bonds involving the water mol­ecules and di­aza­fluorene moieties.     

7‐Bromo­quinolin‐8‐ol

Structure analysis of the title compound, C₉H₆BrNO, has established that bromination of an 8‐hydroxyquinoline derivative occurred in the 7‐position. Intermolecular and weak intramolecular O—H⃛N hydrogen bonds are present, the former causing the mol­ecules to pack as hydrogen‐bonded dimers in the solid state.     

4, 5-二氮芴-9-酮Cu(II)、Co(II)多核配合物的合成，晶体结构及DNA结合作用初探

合成了两个4, 5-二氮芴-9-酮Cu(II)、Co(II)的多核配合物[Cu2(CH3COO)4(H2O) 2]·2dafo 1 和 [(μ2-O)2-Co3(dafo)6] (ClO3)2·H2O 2 (dafo=4,5-diazafluoren-9-one) 并且对它们进行了元素分析,红外以及紫外光谱的表征,同时测定了配合物的晶体结构。用紫外光谱,发射光谱和循环伏安三种方法初步研究了配合物1和2与DNA的结合作用,结果表明,配合物1和2与DNA的结合为以插入作用为主 。     

Racemic 1,2‐diphenylbut‐3‐yn‐2‐ol

Molecules of the title compound, C₁₆H₁₄O, are chiral and crystallize in space group P with Z′ = 2, and with one R and one S mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit. The conformations of the phenyl rings in the two independent mol­ecules differ slightly. Supramolecular organization in the crystal is via tetrameric O—H?H(O) hydrogen‐bonded synthons formed separately by each conformer. These tetrameric synthons stack along the c axis via C[triple‐bond]C—H?O(H) hydrogen bonds. The only link between the conformer stacks is provided by weaker C_methylene—H and C_phenyl—H interactions with π_arene density.     

9,10‐Di­phenyl‐9,10‐epi­dioxy­anthra­cene and 9,10‐di­hydro‐10,10‐di­methoxy‐9‐phenyl­anthracen‐9‐ol

9,10‐Di­phenyl‐9,10‐epi­dioxy­anthracene, C₂₆H₁₈O₂, (I), was accidentally used in a photo­oxy­genation reaction that produced 9,10‐di­hydro‐10,10‐di­methoxy‐9‐phenyl­anthracen‐9‐ol, C₂₂H₂₀O₃, (II). In both compounds, the phenyl rings are approximately orthogonal to the anthracene moiety. The conformation of the anthracene moiety differs as a result of substitution. Intramolecular C—H⃛O interactions in (I) form two approximately planar S(5) rings in each of the two crystallographically independent mol­ecules. The packing of (I) and (II) consists of molecular dimers stabilized by C—H⃛O interactions and of molecular chains stabilized by O—H⃛O interactions, respectively.     

4,4′‐(4,5‐Dimethyl‐1,2‐phenylene)bis(2‐methylbut‐3‐yn‐2‐ol): structural variation in vicinal dialkynols

The structure of the title compound, C₁₈H₂₂O₂, contains two non‐equivalent molecules which differ primarily in the location of the –OH groups on opposite sides or on the same side of the molecular plane. Inversion‐symmetric pairs of molecules form intermolecular O—H...O hydrogen‐bonded tetrameric synthons that link non‐equivalent molecules into an approximately square double layer parallel to (02). Recently reported fluorinated analogues [Kane, Meyers, Yu, Gerken & Etzkorn (2011). Eur. J. Org. Chem. pp. 2969–2980] have significantly different structures of varying complexity that incorporate intramolecular hydrogen bonding and suggest that further study of structure versus substituents in vicinal dialkynols could be fruitful.     

Quinolin‐6‐ol at 100 K

The title compound, C₉H₇NO, has two symmetry‐independent molecules in the asymmetric unit, which have different conformations of the hydroxy group with respect to the quinoline ring. One of the molecules adopts a cis conformation, while the other shows a trans conformation. Each type of independent molecule links into a separate infinite O—H...N hydrogen‐bonded chain with the graph‐set notation C(7). These chains are perpendicular in the unit cell, one extended in the a‐axis direction and the other in the b‐axis direction. There is also a weak C—H...O hydrogen bond with graph‐set notation D(2), which runs in the c‐axis direction and joins the two separate O—H...N chains. The significance of this study lies in the comparison drawn between the experimental and calculated data of the crystal structure of the title compound and the data of several other derivatives possessing the hydroxy group or the quinoline ring. The correlation between the IR spectrum of this compound and the hydrogen‐bond energy is also discussed.     

The low‐temperature phase transition of 9‐methylfluoren‐9‐ol: comparison of the crystal structures at 100 and 200 K

Crystals of 9‐methyl­fluoren‐9‐ol, C₁₄H₁₂O, undergo a reversible phase transition at 176 (2) K. The structure of the high‐temperature α form at 200 K is compared with that of the low‐temperature β form at 100 K. Both polymorphs crystallize in space group P with Z = 4 and contain discrete hydrogen‐bonded R(8) ring tetramers arranged around crystallographic inversion centres. The most obvious changes observed on cooling the crystals to below 176 K are an abrupt increase of ca 0.5 Å in the shortest lattice translation, and a thermal transition with ΔH = 1 kJ mol^?1.     

Halogen bonding in 1,2‐dibromo‐4,5‐dimethoxybenzene and 1,2‐diiodo‐4,5‐dimethoxybenzene

An interesting case of `halogen‐bonding‐promoted' crystal structure architecture is presented. The two title compounds, C₈H₈Br₂O₂ and C₈H₈I₂O₂, have almost indistinguishable molecular structures but very different spatial organization, and this is mainly due to differences in the halogen‐bonding interactions in which the different species present, i.e. Br and I, take part. The dibromo structure exhibits a π‐bonded columnar array involving all four independent molecules in the asymmetric unit, with intercolumnar interactions governed by C—Br...Br—C links and with no C—Br...O/N interactions present. In the diiodo structure, instead, the C—I...O synthon prevails, defining linear chains, in turn interlinked by C—I...I—C interactions.     

4‐Hydro­xy‐3‐methoxy­benz­aldehyde 4,5‐di­azafluoren‐9‐yl­idene­hydrazone

The whole mol­ecule of the title compound, C₁₉H₁₄N₄O₂, is essentially planar, with a highly conjugated π system. In the crystal, the mol­ecules are packed as chains along the [011] direction connected by O—H?N intermolecular hydrogen bonds.     

rac‐Eudesm‐7(11)‐en‐4‐ol

The isolation and structural determination of rac‐eudesm‐7(11)‐en‐4‐ol, C₁₅H₂₆O, from the steam distillate of the flowers of Dipterocarpus cornutus Dyer (Dipterocarpaceae) is described. The structure was determined from spectroscopic data and a single‐crystal X‐ray study. Two similar independent mol­ecules comprise the asymmetric unit of the structure.     

Synthesis and structures of ruthenium di‐ and tricarbonyl complexes derived from 4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐one

Carbon monoxide (CO) has recently been shown to impart beneficial effects in mammalian physiology and considerable research attention is now being directed toward metal–carbonyl complexes as a means of delivering CO to biological targets. Two ruthenium carbonyl complexes, namely trans‐dicarbonyldichlorido(4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐one‐κ²N,N′)ruthenium(II), [RuCl₂(C₁₁H₆N₂O)(CO)₂], (1), and fac‐tricarbonyldichlorido(4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐one‐κN)ruthenium(II), [RuCl₂(C₁₁H₆N₂O)(CO)₃], (2), have been isolated and structurally characterized. In the case of complex (1), the trans‐directing effect of the CO ligands allows bidentate coordination of the 4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐one (dafo) ligand despite a larger bite distance between the N‐donor atoms. In complex (2), the cis disposition of two chloride ligands restricts the ability of the dafo molecule to bind ruthenium in a bidentate fashion. Both complexes exhibit well defined ¹H NMR spectra confirming the diamagnetic ground state of Ru^II and display a strong absorption band around 300 nm in the UV.     

4‐[(2‐Hydroxyethyl)iminomethyl]‐5‐hydroxymethyl‐2‐methylpyridin‐3‐ol

The title compound, C₁₀H₁₄N₂O₃, is a Schiff base which is derived from pyridoxal and represents, therefore, a vitamin B₆‐related compound. Molecules are linked into sheets by a combination of O—H...O and O—H...N hydrogen bonds.     

Two succinic acid derivatives of 2‐ethyl‐6‐methylpyridin‐3‐ol

Crystals of bis(2‐ethyl‐3‐hydroxy‐6‐methylpyridinium) succinate–succinic acid (1/1), C₈H₁₂NO⁺·0.5C₄H₄O₄²⁻·0.5C₄H₆O₄, (I), and 2‐ethyl‐3‐hydroxy‐6‐methylpyridinium hydrogen succinate, C₈H₁₂NO⁺·C₄H₅O₄⁻, (II), were obtained by reaction of 2‐ethyl‐6‐methylpyridin‐3‐ol with succinic acid. The succinate anion and succinic acid molecule in (I) are located about centres of inversion. Intermolecular O—H...O, N—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen bonds are responsible for the formation of a three‐dimensional network in the crystal structure of (I) and a two‐dimensional network in the crystal structure of (II). Both structures are additionally stabilized by π–π interactions between symmetry‐related pyridine rings, forming a rod‐like cationic arrangement for (I) and cationic dimers for (II).     

1,3‐Dichloro‐tetra‐n‐butyl‐distannoxane: a new application for catalyzing the direct substitution of 9H‐xanthen‐9‐ol at room temperature

1,3‐Dichloro‐tetra‐n‐butyl‐distannoxane was firstly used to catalyze the direct substitution of 9H‐xanthen‐9‐ol with indoles at room temperature to afford a class of 3‐(9H‐xanthen‐9‐yl)‐1H‐indole derivatives in good to excellent isolating yield. Moreover, other nucleophiles (such as diketone and pyrrole) could also proceed smoothly in this methodology. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Hydrogen‐bonded networks in 1‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐2,2‐dimethylpropan‐1‐ol

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C₁₂H₁₈O₂, contains two independent molecules. They differ only slightly in conformation but form completely different intermolecular hydrogen‐bonded arrays. One molecule exhibits disorder in the hydroxy group region, but this does not influence the formation of hydrogen bonds. The bulky tert‐butyl group on one side of the carbinol C atom and the benzene ring on the other side promote the formation of discrete dimeric motifs via hydrogen‐bridged hydroxy groups. Dimers are further joined by strong hydroxy–methoxy O—H...O bonds to form chains with dangling alcohol groups. Weaker intermolecular C—H...O interactions mediate the formation of a two‐dimensional network.