Synthesis of a Configurationally Stable Three‐Legged Piano‐Stool Complex

A transition metal Lewis acid with metal‐centered chirality is obtained by η⁶:η¹:η¹ coordination of a 1,3‐disubstituted arene with a phosphane and a pyrazole tether (PArN) to ruthenium. The three‐legged piano‐stool complex [{η⁶:η¹:η¹‐(PArN)}Ru(H₂O)]²⁺ (structure depicted) displays remarkable configurational stability. Its planar chiral, neutral precursor [{η⁶:η¹‐(PArN)}RuCl₂] can be resolved by preparative HPLC.     

[μ‐1κ2O,O′:2(η5)‐Cyclopentadienylcarboxylato][2(η5)‐diphenylphosphinocyclopentadienyl]bis[1,1(η5)‐tetramethylcyclopentadienyl]iron(II)titanium(III)

Reacting stoichiometric amounts of 1‐(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene­carboxylic acid and [Ti(η⁵‐C₅HMe₄)₂(η²‐Me₃SiC[triple‐bond]CSiMe₃)] produced the title carboxyl­atotitanocene complex, [{μ‐1κ²O,O′:2(η⁵)‐C₅H₄CO₂}{2(η⁵)‐C₅H₄P(C₆H₅)₂}{1(η⁵)‐C₅H(CH₃)₄}₂Fe^IITi^III] or [FeTi(C₉H₁₃)₂(C₆H₄O₂)(C₁₇H₁₄P)]. The angle subtended by the Ti/O/O′ plane, where O and O′ are the donor atoms of the κ²‐carboxy­late group, and the plane of the carboxyl‐substituted ferrocene cyclo­penta­dienyl is 24.93 (6)°.     

Tris(3,5‐di­methyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐1‐thio­carboxamidato‐κ2N2,N)­cobalt(III)

In the crystal structure of the title complex, [Co(C₆H₈N₃S)₃], the Co^III atom is octahedrally coordinated by three monodeprotonated bidentate 3,5‐di­methyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐1‐thio­carbox­amide ligands with two thio­carbox­amide N atoms in axial positions. The asymmetric unit contains two mol­ecules (A and B) and these mol­ecules are arranged in chains in an alternating fashion connected by N—H⋯S interactions.     

Dimeric Structure of [(η2‐NO3)2(tpy)Bi(μ‐OH)2Bi(tpy)(η2‐NO3)2]

The synthesis and single crystal X‐ray structure determination are reported for the 2,2′ : 6′,2″‐terpyridine (= tpy) adduct of bismuth(III) nitrate. The hydroxide‐bridged dimer [(η²‐NO₃)₂(tpy)Bi(μ‐OH)₂Bi(tpy)(η²‐NO₃)₂] with nine‐coordinate geometry about Bi was the only isolable product from all crystallization attempts in varying ratios of Bi(NO₃) : terpy.; [(η²‐NO₃)₂(tpy)Bi(μ‐OH)₂Bi(tpy) · (η²‐NO₃)₂] is triclinic, P 1, a = 7.941(8), b = 10.732(9), c = 11.235(9) Å; α = 63.05(1), β = 85.01(1), γ = 79.26(1)°, Z = 1, dimer, R = 0.058 for N₀ = 2319.     

trans‐Bis­[1‐methyl‐3‐(p‐nitro­phenyl)­triazenido 1‐oxide‐κ2N3,O]­di­pyridine­nickel(II)

In the centrosymmetric title complex, [Ni(C₇H₇N₄O₃)₂(C₅H₅N)₂], the coordination geometry about the Ni²⁺ ion is octahedral, with two deprotonated 1‐methyl‐3‐(p‐nitro­phenyl)­triazenide 1‐oxide ions, viz. [O₂N­C₆H₄­NNN(O)­CH₃]^?, acting as bidentate ligands (four‐electron donors). Two neutral pyridine (py) mol­ecules complete the coordination sphere in positions trans to each other. The triazenide 1‐oxide ligand is almost planar, the largest interplanar angle of 8.80 (12)° being between the phenyl ring of the p‐nitro­phenyl group and the plane defined by the N₃O moiety. The Ni—N_triazenide, Ni—O and Ni—N_py distances are 2.0794 (16), 2.0427 (13) and 2.1652 (18) Å, respectively.     

Supramolecular framework in catena‐poly[[(nitrato‐κO)silver(I)]‐μ‐(R,S)‐2‐(pyridin‐4‐ylsulfinyl)pyrimidine‐κ3N,O:N′]

In the title complex, [Ag(NO₃)(C₉H₇N₃OS)]_n, η¹:η¹:η¹:μ₂‐bridging 2‐(pyridin‐4‐ylsulfinyl)pyrimidine (pypmSO) ligands with opposite chiralities are alternately arranged to link the Ag^I cations through two N atoms and one sulfinyl O atom of each ligand, leading to an extended zigzag coordination chain structure along the [01] direction. An FT–IR spectroscopic study shows a decreased stretching frequency for the η¹‐O‐bonded S=O group compared with that of the free ligand. The parallel chains are arranged and interconnected via O(S=O)...π(pyridine/pyrimidine) and C—H(pyridine)...O(NO₃⁻) interactions to furnish a layer almost parallel to the ac plane. Along the b axis, the layers are stacked and stabilized through anion(NO₃⁻)...π(pyrimidine) interactions to form a three‐dimensional supramolecular framework. The ligand behaviour of the new diheterocyclic sulfoxide and the unconventional O(S=O)...π(pyridine/pyrimidine) and anion(NO₃⁻)...π(pyrimidine) interactions in the supramolecular assembly of the title complex are presented.     

Carbonyl­[di­hydro­bis­(pyrazol‐1‐yl‐κN2)­borato]­hydrido­bis­(tri‐p‐tolyl­phosphine‐κP)­ruthenium(II)

The title compound, [RuH(C₆H₈BN₄)(C₂₁H₂₁P)₂(CO)], possesses two trans‐disposed tri‐p‐tolyl­phosphines in axial positions and the remaining ligands in equatorial positions. The overall geometry of the Ru^II ion is a distorted octahedral structure. The P—Ru—P axis deviates from linearity by about 13°. This distortion arises mainly from the steric congestion between the bulky phosphine moieties and the tetrahedral di­hydro­bis­(pyrazol‐1‐yl)­borate ligands.     

Redetermination of hexa­carbonyl­(η5‐cyclo­penta­dienyl)­bis(μ3‐selenido)­diiron(II)­cobalt(II)

The structure of the title compound, hexa­carbonyl‐1κ³C,2κ³C‐[3(η⁵)‐cyclo­penta­dienyl]­bis(μ₃‐selenido)­diiron(II)­cobalt(II),[CoFe₂(μ₃‐Se)₂(C₅H₅)(CO)₆], was redetermined at room temperature and the correct C2/c space group was assumed instead of the previously reported P space group [Mathur et al. (1995). Organometallics, 14 , 2115–2118]. Analysis of the literature data showed that the previously reported triclinic parameters correspond to a primitive subcell of the actual monoclinic C‐centred cell with cell dimensions close to those found by us. The title compound appeared to be isostructural with the sulfur–selenium analogue.     

Bis(μ‐hexa­methyl­enetetr­amine)­bis(aqua­di­bromo­cadmium)­di­aqua­di­bromo­cadmium dihydrate

The title compound, poly­[[di­aqua­di­bromo­cadmium‐μ‐(1,3,5,7‐tetra­aza­tri­cyclo[3.3.1.1^3,7]decane‐N¹:N⁵)‐aqua­cad­mium‐di‐μ‐bromo‐aqua­cadmium‐μ‐(1,3,5,7‐tetra­aza­tri­cyclo[3.3.1.1^3,7]decane‐N¹:N⁵)‐di‐μ‐bromo] dihydrate], [Cd₃­Br₆­(C₆­H₁₂­N₄)₂­(H₂O)₄]·­2H₂O, is made up of two‐dimensional neutral rectangular coordination layers. Each rectangular subunit is enclosed by a pair of Cd₃(μ₂‐Br)₆(H₂O)₃ fragments and a pair of (μ₂‐hmt)Cd(H₂O)₂Br₂(μ₂‐hmt) fragments as sides (hmt is hexa­methyl­enetetr­amine). The unique Cd^II atom in the Cd₂Br₂ ring in the Cd₃(μ₂‐Br)₆(H₂O)₃ fragment is in a slightly distorted octahedral CdNOBr₄ geometry, surrounded by one hmt ligand [2.433 (5) Å], one aqua ligand [2.273 (4) Å] and four Br atoms [2.6409 (11)–3.0270 (14) Å]. The Cd^II atom in the (μ₂‐hmt)Cd(H₂O)₂Br₂(μ₂‐hmt) fragment lies on an inversion center and is in a highly distorted octahedral CdN₂O₂Br₂ geometry, surrounded by two trans‐related N atoms of two hmt ligands [2.479 (5) Å], two trans‐related aqua ligands [2.294 (4) Å] and two trans‐related Br atoms [2.6755 (12) Å]. Adjacent two‐dimensional coordination sheets are connected into a three‐dimensional network by hydrogen bonds involving lattice water mol­ecules, and the aqua, bromo and hmt ligands belonging to different layers.     

Chloridobis[2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)ethanamine‐κ2P,N](triphenylphosphane‐κP)ruthenium(II) chloride toluene monosolvate

The aminophosphane ligand 1‐amino‐2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)ethane [Ph₂P(CH₂)₂NH₂] reacts with dichloridotris(triphenylphosphane)ruthenium(II), [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃], to form chloridobis[2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)ethanamine‐κ²P,N](triphenylphosphane‐κP)ruthenium(II) chloride toluene monosolvate, [RuCl(C₁₈H₁₅P)(C₁₄H₁₆NP)₂]Cl·C₇H₈ or [RuCl(PPh₃){Ph₂P(CH₂)₂NH₂}₂]Cl·C₇H₈. The asymmetric unit of the monoclinic unit cell contains two molecules of the Ru^II cation, two chloride anions and two toluene molecules. The Ru^II cation is octahedrally coordinated by two chelating Ph₂P(CH₂)₂NH₂ ligands, a triphenylphosphane (PPh₃) ligand and a chloride ligand. The three P atoms are meridionally coordinated, with the Ph₂P– groups from the ligands being trans. The two –NH₂ groups are cis, as are the chloride and PPh₃ ligands. This chiral stereochemistry of the [RuCl(PPh₃){Ph₂P(CH₂)₂NH₂}₂]⁺ cation is unique in ruthenium–aminophosphane chemistry.     

Syntheses,and Crystal Structures of Indium Complexes with η2‐Piperidinyldithiocarbamate and η2‐Pyridine‐2‐Thionate Containing Ligands: Structures of [In(η2‐S2CNC5H10)3] and [In(η2‐pyS)3]

The η²‐thio‐indium complexes [In(η²‐thio)₃] (thio = S₂CNC₅H₁₀, 2 ; SNC₄H₄, (pyridine‐2‐thionate, pyS, 3 ) and [In(η²‐pyS)₂(η²‐acac)], 4 , (acac: acetylacetonate) are prepared by reacting the tris(η²‐acac)indium complex [In(η²‐acac)₃], 1 with HS₂CNC₅H₁₀, pySH, and pySH with ratios of 1:3, 1:3, and 1:2 in dichloromethane at room temperature, respectively. All of these complexes are identified by spectroscopic methods and complexes 2 and 3 are determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. Crystal data for 2 : space group, C2/c with a = 13.5489(8) Å, b = 12.1821(7) Å, c = 16.0893(10) Å, β = 101.654(1)°, V = 2600.9(3) ų, and Z = 4. The structure was refined to R = 0.033 and Rw = 0.086; Crystal data for 3 : space group, P2₁ with a = 8.8064 (6) Å, b = 11.7047 (8) Å, c = 9.4046 (7) Å, β = 114.78 (1)°, V = 880.13(11) ų, and Z = 2. The structure was refined to R = 0.030 and Rw = 0.061. The geometry around the metal atom of the two complexes is a trigonal prismatic coordination. The piperidinyldithiocarbamate and pyridine‐2‐thionate ligands, respectively, coordinate to the indium metal center through the two sulfur atoms and one sulfur and one nitrogen atoms, respectively. The short C‐N bond length in the range of 1.322(4)–1.381(6) Å in 2 and C‐S bond length in the range of 1.715(2)–1.753(6) Å in 2 and 3 , respectively, indicate considerable partial double bond character.     

cis‐Bis­[1,3‐bis(2‐fluoro­phenyl)­triazenido‐κ2N1,N3]­bis­(pyridine‐κN)cadmium(II)

In the title compound, [Cd(C₁₂H₈F₂N₃)₂(C₅H₅N)₂], the Cd atom lies on a crystallographic twofold axis in space group Iba2. The coordination geometry about the Cd^II ion corresponds to a rhombically distorted octahedron, with two deprotonated 1,3‐bis(2‐fluoro­phenyl)­triazenide ions, viz. FC₆H₄NNNC₆H₄F⁻, acting as bidentate ligands (four‐electron donors). Two neutral pyridine (py) mol­ecules complete the coordination sphere in positions cis with respect to one another. The triazenide ligand is not planar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.204 Å), the dihedral angle between the phenyl rings of the terminal 2‐fluoro­phenyl substituents being 24.6 (1)°. The triazenide and pyridine Cd—N distances are 2.3757 (18)/2.3800 (19) and 2.3461 (19) Å, respectively. Intermolecular C—H⋯F interactions generate sheets of mol­ecules in the (010) plane.     

Synthesis,Reactivity, and Crystal Structure of the η2‐Thiocarbamoyl Palladium Complex [Pd(PPh3)2(η2‐SCNMe2)][PF6]

The η¹‐thiocarbamoyl palladium complexes [Pd(PPh₃)(η¹‐SCNMe₂)(η²‐S₂R)] (R = P(OEt)₂, 2 ; CNEt₂, 3 ) and trans‐[Pd(PPh₃)₂(η¹‐SCNMe₂)(η¹‐Spy)], 4 , (pyS: pyridine‐2‐thionate) are prepared by reacting the η²‐thiocarbamoyl palladium complex [Pd(PPh₃)₂(η²‐SCNMe₂)][PF₆], 1 with (EtO)₂PS₂NH₄, Et₂NCS₂Na, and pySK in methanol at room temperature, respectively. Treatment of 1 with dppm (dppm: bis(diphenylphosphino)methane) in dichloromethane at room temperature gives complex [Pd(PPh₃)(η¹‐SCNMe₂)(η²‐dppm)] [PF₆], 5 . All of the complexes are identified by spectroscopic methods and complex 1 is determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Chloro­di­methyl(N‐methyl­pyrrolidin­one)­tin(IV)‐μ‐chloro‐di­chloro­di­methyl­tin(IV)

The synthesis and the X‐ray structural analysis of the title compound, μ‐chloro‐1:2κ²Cl‐tri­chloro‐1κCl,2κ²Cl‐tetra­methyl‐1κ²C,2κ²C‐(N‐methyl­pyrrolidin‐2‐one)‐1κO‐ditin(IV), [Sn₂Cl₄(CH₃)₄(C₅H₉NO)], are described. The title compound is found to exhibit a distorted trigonal–bipyramidal geometry at both Sn^IV atoms. The Sn—Cl—Sn angle involving the bridging chlorine ligand is 135.56 (5)°, with the Sn—Cl bond lengths being 2.5704 (13) and 3.1159 (13) Å.     

2, 4‐Dimethylpenta‐1, 3‐dien‐ und 2, 4‐Dimethylpentadienyl‐Komplexe des Rhodiums und Iridiums

2, 4‐Dimethylpenta‐1, 3‐diene and 2, 4‐Dimethylpentadienyl Complexes of Rhodium and Iridium The complexes [(η⁴‐C₇H₁₂)RhCl]₂ ( 1 ) (C₇H₁₂ = 2, 4‐dimethylpenta‐1, 3‐diene) and [(η⁴‐C₇H₁₂)₂IrCl] ( 2 ) were obtained by interaction of C₇H₁₂ with [(η²‐C₂H₄)₂RhCl]₂ and [(η²‐cyclooctene)₂IrCl]₂, respectively. The reaction of 1 or 2 with CpTl (Cp = η⁵‐C₅H₅) yields the compounds [CpM(η⁴‐C₇H₁₂)] ( 3a : M = Rh; 3b : M = Ir). The hydride abstraction at the pentadiene ligand of 3a , b with Ph₃CBF₄ proceeds differently depending on the solvent. In acetone or THF the “half‐open” metallocenium complexes [CpM(η⁵‐C₇H₁₁)]BF₄ ( 4a : M = Rh; 4b : M = Ir) are obtained exclusively. In dichloromethane mixtures are produced which additionally contain the species [(η⁵‐C₇H₁₁)M(η⁵‐C₅H₄CPh₃)]BF₄ ( 5a : M = Rh; 5b : M = Ir) formed by electrophilic substitution at the Cp ring, as well as the η³‐2, 4‐dimethylpentenyl compound [(η³‐C₇H₁₃)Rh{η⁵‐C₅H₃(CPh₃)₂}]BF₄ ( 6 ). By interaction of 2, 4‐dimethylpentadienyl potassium with 1 or 2 the complexes [(η⁴‐C₇H₁₂)M(η⁵‐C₇H₁₁)] ( 7a : M = Rh; 7b : M = Ir) are generated which show dynamic behaviour in solution; however, attempts to synthesize the “open” metallocenium cations [(η⁵‐C₇H₁₁)₂M]⁺ by hydride abstraction from 7a , b failed. The new compounds were characterized by elemental analysis and spectroscopically, 4b and 5a also by X‐ray structure analysis.     

[2,6‐Bis(1H‐benzimidazol‐2‐yl‐κN3)­pyridine‐κN](di­methyl­form­amide‐κO)­(thio­sulfato‐κ2O,S)­nickel(II) mono­hydrate

The structure of the title compound, [Ni(ths)(bbip)(dmf)]·­H₂O [ths is thio­sulfate, S₂O₃; bbip is 2,6‐bis(1H‐benz­imidazol‐2‐yl)­pyridine, C₂₁H₁₃N₅; and dmf is di­methyl­form­amide, C₃H₇NO], is monomeric, with the nickel ion octahe­drally surrounded by an N,N′,N′′‐tridentate bbip mol­ecule, an S,O‐bidentate ths mol­ecule and an O‐monodentate dmf mol­ecule. The H atoms of the hydration water mol­ecule and the amino groups of bbip are involved in hydrogen bonding and determine a spatial organization of broad layers parallel to (001), which are connected by weak interactions.     

Ru–η6‐Arene Cations [{(Ph2PC6H4)2B(η6‐Ph)}RuX]+ (X=Cl,H) as Lewis Acids

The reactivity of [{(Ph₂PC₆H₄)₂B(η⁶‐Ph)}RuCl][B(C₆F₅)₄] ( 1 ) as a Lewis acid was investigated. Treatment of 1 with mono and multidentate phosphorus Lewis bases afforded the Lewis acid–base adducts with the ortho‐carbon atom of the coordinated arene ring. Similar reactivity was observed upon treatment with N‐heterocyclic carbenes; however, adduct formation occurred at both ortho‐ and para‐carbon atoms of the bound arene with the para‐position being favoured by increased steric demands. Interestingly treatment with isocyanides resulted in adduct formation with the B‐centre of the ligand framework. The hydride‐cation [{(Ph₂PC₆H₄)₂B(η⁶‐Ph)}RuH] [B(C₆F₅)₄] was prepared via reaction of 1 with silane. This species in the presence of a bulky phosphine behaves as a frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) to activate H₂ between the phosphorus centre and the ortho‐carbon atom of the η⁶‐arene ring.     

A twofold interpenetrating three‐dimensional CdII coordination framework: poly[[μ2‐1,3‐bis(2‐methyl‐1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)benzene](μ3‐5‐nitrobenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylato)cadmium(II)]

A twofold interpenetrating three‐dimensional Cd^II coordination framework, [Cd(C₈H₃NO₆)(C₁₄H₁₄N₄)]_n, has been prepared and characterized by IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, thermal analysis and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The asymmetric unit consists of a divalent Cd^II atom, one 1,3‐bis(2‐methyl‐1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)benzene (1,3‐BMIB) ligand and one fully deprotonated 5‐nitrobenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylate (NO₂‐BDC²⁻) ligand. The coordination sphere of the Cd^II atom consists of five O‐donor atoms from three different NO₂‐BDC²⁻ ligands and two imidazole N‐donor atoms from two different 1,3‐BMIB ligands, forming a distorted {CdN₂O₅} pentagonal bipyramid. The NO₂‐BDC ligand links three Cd^II atoms via a μ₁‐η¹:η¹ chelating mode and a μ₂‐η²:η¹ bridging mode. The title compound is a twofold interpenetrating 3,5‐connected network with the {4².6⁵.8³}{4².6} topology. In addition, the compound exhibits fluorescence emissions in the solid state at room temperature.     

Dinuclear Rare‐Earth Metal Alkyl Complexes Supported by Indolyl Ligands in μ‐η2:η1:η1 Hapticities and their High Catalytic Activity for Isoprene 1,4‐cis‐Polymerization

Two series of new dinuclear rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes supported by indolyl ligands in novel μ‐η²:η¹:η¹ hapticities are synthesized and characterized. Treatment of [RE(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂] with 1 equivalent of 3‐(tBuN?CH)C₈H₅NH ( L₁ ) in THF gives the dinuclear rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes trans‐[(μ‐η²:η¹:η¹‐3‐{tBuNCH(CH₂SiMe₃)}Ind)RE(thf)(CH₂SiMe₃)]₂ (Ind=indolyl, RE=Y, Dy, or Yb) in good yields. In the process, the indole unit of L₁ is deprotonated by the metal alkyl species and the imino C?N group is transferred to the amido group by alkyl CH₂SiMe₃ insertion, affording a new dianionic ligand that bridges two metal alkyl units in μ‐η²:η¹:η¹ bonding modes, forming the dinuclear rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes. When L₁ is reduced to 3‐(tBuNHCH₂)C₈H₅NH ( L₂ ), the reaction of [Yb(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(thf)₂] with 1 equivalent of L₂ in THF, interestingly, generated the trans‐[(μ‐η²:η¹:η¹‐3‐{tBuNCH₂}Ind)Yb(thf)(CH₂SiMe₃)]₂ (major) and cis‐[(μ‐η²:η¹:η¹‐3‐{tBuNCH₂}Ind)Yb(thf)(CH₂SiMe₃)]₂ (minor) complexes. The catalytic activities of these dinuclear rare‐earth metal alkyl complexes for isoprene polymerization were investigated; the yttrium and dysprosium complexes exhibited high catalytic activities and high regio‐ and stereoselectivities for isoprene 1,4‐cis‐polymerization.     

μ‐Aqua‐penta­aqua­[μ‐3,6‐bis(6‐methyl‐2‐pyridyl)­pyridazine]­chloro­dinickel(II) trichloride trihydrate

The title compound, μ‐aqua‐1:2κ²O‐penta­aqua‐1κ²O,2κ³O‐μ‐3,6‐bis(6‐methyl‐2‐pyridyl)­pyridazine‐1κ²N¹,N⁶:2κ²N²,N³‐chloro‐1κCl‐dinickel(II) trichloride trihydrate, [Ni₂Cl(C₁₆H₁₄­N₄)(H₂O)₆]Cl₃·3H₂O, consists of two Ni^II atoms, a 3,6‐bis(6‐methyl‐2‐pyridyl)­pyridazine mol­ecule, four Cl atoms and nine water mol­ecules. The two Ni atoms are octahedrally coordinated by N and Cl atoms, and by water mol­ecules, and the three six‐membered rings, a pyridazine and two picolines, are planar to within 0.181 (3) Å. The crystal structure is stabilized by an intra‐ and intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding scheme involving water–water and water–chlorine interactions.