A one‐dimensional carboxyl­ate‐bridged helical copper(II) complex containing (quinolin‐8‐yl­oxy)­acetate

The title compound, catena‐poly[­[bromo­copper(II)]‐μ‐(quin­olin‐8‐yl­oxy)­acetato‐κ⁴N,O,O′:O′′], [CuBr(C₁₁H₈NO₃)]_n, is a novel carboxyl­ate‐bridged one‐dimensional helical copper(II) polymer. The metal ion exhibits an approximately square‐pyramidal CuBrNO₃ coordination environment, with the three donor atoms of the ligand and the bromide ion occupying the basal positions, and an O atom belonging to the carboxyl­ate group of an adjacent mol­ecule in the apical site. Carboxyl­ate groups are mutually cis oriented, and each anti–anti carboxyl­ate group bridges two copper(II) ions via one apical and one basal position [Cu⋯Cu = 5.677 (1) Å], resulting in the formation of a helical chain along the crystallographic b axis.     

8‐Aza‐7‐deaza‐2′‐de­oxy‐2‐(methyl­sulfan­yl)adenosine

In the title compound, 4‐amino‐1‐(2‐de­oxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐pentofuranos­yl)‐6‐methyl­sulfanyl‐1H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d]pyrimidine, C₁₁H₁₆N₅O₃S, the conformation of the glycosidic bond is between anti and high anti. The 2′‐deoxy­ribofuranosyl moiety adopts the C3′‐exo–C4′‐endo conformation (₃T⁴, S‐type sugar pucker), and the conformation at the exocyclic C—C bond is +sc (+gauche). The exocyclic 6‐amine group and the 2‐methyl­sulfanyl group lie on different sides of the heterocyclic ring system. The mol­ecules form a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded network that is stabilized by O—H⋯N, N—H⋯O and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.     

2‐Amino‐7‐chloro‐2′‐deoxy­tubercidin

In 4‐chloro‐7‐(2‐de­oxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐pento­furanos­yl)‐7H‐pyr­rolo­[2,3‐d]­pyrimidine‐2,4‐diamine, C₁₁H₁₄ClN₅O₃, the conformation of the N‐glycosylic bond is between anti and high‐anti [χ = −102.5 (6)°]. The 2′‐deoxy­ribofuranosyl unit adopts the C3′‐endo‐C4′‐exo (³T₄) sugar pucker (N‐type) with P = 19.6° and τ_m = 32.9° [terminology: Saenger (1989). Landolt‐Börnstein New Series, Vol. 1, Nucleic Acids, Subvol. a, edited by O. Madelung, pp. 1–21. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag]. The orientation of the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is +ap (trans) with a torsion angle γ = 171.5 (4)°. The compound forms a three‐dimensional network that is stabilized by four inter­molecular hydrogen bonds (N—H⋯O and O—H⋯N) and one intra­molecular hydrogen bond (N—H⋯Cl).     

The regioisomeric 1H(2H)‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d]pyrimidine N1‐ and N2‐(2′‐deoxy‐β‐D‐ribofuranosides)

In the title regioisomeric nucleosides, alternatively called 1‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐furan­osyl)‐1H‐pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidine, C₁₀H₁₂N₄O₃, (II), and 2‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐furan­osyl)‐2H‐pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]pyrimidine, C₁₀H₁₂N₄O₃, (III), the conformations of the gly­cosyl­ic bonds are anti [?100.4 (2)° for (II) and 15.0 (2)° for (III)]. Both nucleosides adopt an S‐type sugar pucker, which is C2′‐endo‐C3′‐exo (²T₃) for (II) and 3′‐exo (between ₃E and ⁴T₃) for (III).     

Secondary inter­actions in two related terphenyl derivatives: 2′,5′‐dimethyl‐p‐terphenyl and 2′,5′‐bis­(bromo­meth­yl)‐p‐terphen­yl

In 2′,5′‐dimethyl‐p‐terphenyl, C₂₀H₁₈, which displays pseudosymmetry (the true space group is Pna2₁, but less satisfactory refinement can also be achieved in Pbcn), the mol­ecules are linked into chains by two short C—H⋯π inter­actions to the centroid of the central ring. In 2′,5′‐bis­(bromo­meth­yl)‐p‐terphenyl, C₂₀H₁₆Br₂, the polar CH₂Br groups cause mol­ecules to aggregate via C—H⋯Br and Br⋯Br inter­actions, forming a layer structure, in which the phenyl rings project outwards from the central, more polar, region.     

π‐Facial selectivities of diastereotopic ketones: p‐bromobenzoates of 4‐hetero‐1‐decalinols

The crystal structures of the p‐bromo­benzoates of cis‐4‐oxa‐1‐decalinyl (C₁₆H₁₉BrO₃), trans‐4‐oxa‐1‐decalinyl (C₁₆H₁₉­BrO₃), N‐benzyl‐cis‐4‐aza‐1‐decalinyl (C₂₃H₂₆BrNO₂), N‐benzyl‐trans‐4‐aza‐1‐decalinyl (C₂₃H₂₆BrNO₂) and trans‐4‐thia‐1‐decalinyl (C₁₆H₁₉BrO₂S) (decalin is per­hydro­naphthalene) have been determined as part of a study directed at predicting and interpreting the π‐facial selectivities of diastereotopic ketones in reactions with nucleophiles. All five structures are composed of mol­ecules that are separated by normal van der Waals distances. In all five structures, the heterocyclic and cyclo­hexyl rings adopt chair conformations, and the p‐bromo­benzoate groups are planar.     

1‐(β‐d‐Erythrofuranos­yl)cytidine (β‐erythrocytidine)

1‐(β‐d ‐Erythrofuranosyl)cytidine, C₈H₁₁N₃O₄, (I), a derivative of β‐cytidine, (II), lacks an exocyclic hydroxy­methyl (–CH₂OH) substituent at C4′ and crystallizes in a global conformation different from that observed for (II). In (I), the β‐d ‐erythrofuranosyl ring assumes an E₃ conformation (C3′‐exo; S, i.e. south), and the N‐glycoside bond conformation is syn. In contrast, (II) contains a β‐d ‐ribofuranosyl ring in a ³T₂ conformation (N, i.e. north) and an anti‐N‐glycoside linkage. These crystallographic properties mimic those found in aqueous solution by NMR with respect to furan­ose conformation. Removal of the –CH₂OH group thus affects the global conformation of the aldofuranosyl ring. These results provide further support for S/syn–anti and N/anti correlations in pyrimidine nucleosides. The crystal structure of (I) was determined at 200 K.     

Two polymorphs of bis(2‐bromophenyl) di­sulfide

Colourless crystals of the title compound, bis(2‐bromo­phenyl) di­sulfide, C₁₂H₈Br₂S₂, are obtained from the reaction of 2‐bromo­phenyl­mercaptan with metallic sodium and either zinc chloride or cadmium chloride in methanol. In the presence of Zn^II ions, the crystals are orthorhombic (space group Pbca, with Z′ = 1); with Cd^II ions present, the product is triclinic (space group , with Z′ = 4). Both polymorphs exhibit significant intramolecular C—H⋯S hydrogen bonds. In the ortho­rhombic form, mol­ecules are linked by intermolecular C—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds, while in the triclinic form, mol­ecules exhibit Br⋯Br contacts.     

2‐(6‐Bromopyridin‐3‐yl)‐4,4,5,5‐tetramethyl‐1,3,2‐dioxaborolane and (6‐bromopyridin‐3‐yl)boronic acid,new bifunctional building blocks for combinatorial chemistry

The first comparative study between two new heterocyclic boron derivatives, viz. a (6‐bromo­pyridin‐3‐yl)­boronic ester, C₁₁H₁₅BBrNO₂, and (6‐bromo­pyridin‐3‐yl)­boronic acid, C₅H₅BBrNO₂, shows a small but not significant difference in their C—B bond lengths, which cannot explain the experimentally observed difference in their stabilities. The crystal packing of the boronic ester consists principally of van der Waals interactions, while the boronic acid mol­ecules interact in their crystal through hydrogen bonds.     

The α‐d anomer of 5‐aza‐7‐deaza‐2′‐deoxyguanosine

In the monohydrate of 2‐amino‐8‐(2‐deoxy‐α‐d ‐erythro‐pento­furan­osyl)‐8H‐imidazo­[1,2‐a]­[1,3,5]­triazin‐4‐one, C₁₀H₁₃N₅O₄·H₂O, denoted (I) or αZ_d, the conformation of the N‐gly­cosyl­ic bond is in the high‐anti range [χ = 87.5 (3)°]. The 2′‐deoxy­ribo­furan­ose moiety adopts a C2′‐endo,C3′‐exo(^2′T_3′) sugar puckering (S‐type sugar) and the conformation at the C4′—C5′ bond is ?sc (trans).     

7‐De­aza‐2′‐deoxy‐7‐propynyl­guanosine

The title compound, C₁₄H₁₆N₄O₄, adopts the anti conformation at the gly­cosylic bond [χ−117.1 (5)°]. The sugar pucker of the 2′‐deoxy­ribo­furan­osyl moiety is C2′‐endo–C3′‐exo, ²T₃ (S‐type). The orientation of the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is +sc (gauche). The propynyl group is linear and coplanar with the nucleobase moiety. The structure of the compound is stabilized by several hydrogen bonds (N—H⋯O and O—H⋯O), leading to the formation of a multi‐layered network. The nucleobases, as well as the propynyl groups, are stacked. This stacking might cause the extraordinary stability of DNA duplexes containing this compound.     

Regioisomeric 4‐nitroindazole N1‐ and N2‐(β‐d‐ribonucleosides)

The structures of the isomeric nucleosides 4‐nitro‐1‐(β‐d ‐ribo­furan­osyl)‐1H‐indazole, C₁₂H₁₃N₃O₆, (I), and 4‐nitro‐2‐(β‐d ‐ribo­furan­osyl)‐2H‐indazole, C₁₂H₁₃N₃O₆, (II), have been determined. For compound (I), the conformation of the gly­cosylic bond is anti [χ = −93.6 (6)°] and the sugar puckering is C2′‐exo–C3′‐endo. Compound (II) shows two conformations in the crystalline state which differ mainly in the sugar pucker; type 1 adopts the C2′‐endo–C3′‐exo sugar puckering associated with a syn base orientation [χ = 43.7 (6)°] and type 2 shows C2′‐exo–C3′‐endo sugar puckering accompanied by a somewhat different syn base orientation [χ = 13.8 (6)°].     

2′‐Deoxy‐7‐propynyl‐7‐deaza­adenosine: a DNA duplex‐stabilizing nucleoside

In the title compound, 2′‐deoxy‐7‐propynyl‐7‐deaza­adenosine, C₁₄H₁₆N₄O₃, the torsion angle of the N‐glycosylic bond is anti [χ = −130.7 (2)°]. The sugar pucker of the 2′‐deoxy­ribo­furanosyl moiety is C2′‐endo–C3′‐exo, ²T₃ (S‐type), with P = 185.9 (2)° and τ_m = 39.1 (1)°, and the orientation of the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is −ap (trans). The 7‐substituted propynyl group is nearly coplanar with the heterocyclic base moiety. Mol­ecules of the nucleoside form a layered network in which the heterocyclic bases are stacked head‐to‐tail with a closest distance of 3.197 (1) Å. The crystal structure of the nucleoside is stabilized by three inter­molecular hydrogen bonds of types N—H⋯ O, O—H⋯ N and O—H⋯ O.     

1‐Acetyl‐3′‐(4‐bromophenyl)‐3′‐chlorospiro[3H‐indole‐3,2′‐oxetan]‐2(1H)‐one

In the title compound, C₁₈H₁₃BrClNO₃, the heterocyclic ring of the indole is distorted from planarity towards an envelope conformation. The orientations of the indole, oxetane, chloro and bromo­phenyl substituents are conditioned by the sp³ states of the spiro‐junction and the Cl‐attached C atoms.     

Three (E)‐2‐[(bromo­phen­yl)imino­meth­yl]‐4‐methoxy­phenols

The title compounds, (E)‐2‐[(2‐bromo­phenyl)imino­methyl]‐4‐methoxy­phenol, C₁₄H₁₂BrNO₂, (I), (E)‐2‐[(3‐bromo­phenyl)­imino­methyl]‐4‐methoxy­phenol, C₁₄H₁₂BrNO₂, (II), and (E)‐2‐[(4‐bromo­phenyl)imino­methyl]‐4‐methoxy­phenol, C₁₄H₁₂BrNO₂, (III), adopt the phenol–imine tautomeric form. In all three structures, there are strong intra­molecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds. Compound (I) has strong inter­molecular hydrogen bonds, while compound (III) has weak inter­molecular hydrogen bonds. In addition to these inter­molecular inter­actions, C—H⋯π inter­actions in (I) and (III), and π–π inter­actions in (I), play roles in the crystal packing. The dihedral angles between the aromatic rings are 15.34 (12), 6.1 (3) and 39.2 (14)° for (I), (II) and (III), respectively.     

Ethyl 3‐(2′‐deoxyuridin‐5‐yl)‐3‐hydroxy‐2‐iodopropanoate,a ­nucleoside analogue

In the title compound, C₁₄H₁₉IN₂O₈, an almost planar heterocyclic base is oriented anti with respect to the puckered sugar moiety. The sugar pucker is C2′‐endo/C3′‐exo, the N‐glycosidic torsion angle is 166.4 (4)° and the conformation of O5′ is +sc. The mol­ecules are linked by hydrogen bonds of the types N—H?O and O—H?O.     

6‐Aza‐2′‐deoxy­uridine and N3‐anisoyl‐6‐aza‐2′‐deoxy­uridine

In 2‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐pentofuranosyl)‐1,2,4‐triazine‐3,5(2H,4H)‐dione (6‐aza‐2′‐deoxy­uridine), C₈H₁₁N₃O₅, (I), the conformation of the glycosylic bond is between anti and high‐anti [χ = −94.0 (3)°], whereas the derivative 2‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐pentofuranosyl)‐N⁴‐(2‐methoxy­benzoyl)‐1,2,4‐triazine‐3,5(2H,4H)‐dione (N³‐anisoyl‐6‐aza‐2′‐deoxy­uridine), C₁₆H₁₇N₃O₇, (II), displays a high‐anti conformation [χ = −86.4 (3)°]. The furanosyl moiety in (I) adopts the S‐type sugar pucker (²T₃), with P = 188.1 (2)° and τ_m = 40.3 (2)°, while the sugar pucker in (II) is N (³T₄), with P = 36.1 (3)° and τ_m = 33.5 (2)°. The crystal structures of (I) and (II) are stabilized by inter­molecular N—H⋯O and O—H⋯O inter­actions.     

catena‐Poly[potassium [copper(II)‐μ‐isothiocyanato‐μ‐N‐salicylidene‐β‐alaninato(2–)]]

The title polymeric compound, catena‐poly­[dipotassium [bis­[μ‐N‐salicyl­idene‐β‐alaninato(2−)]‐κ⁴O,N,O′:O′′;κ⁴O′′:O,N,O′‐dicopper(II)]‐di‐μ‐iso­thio­cyanato‐κ²N:S;κ²S:N], {K[Cu(NCS)(C₁₀H₉NO₃)]}_n, consists of [iso­thio­cyanato(N‐salicyl­idene‐β‐alaninato)copper(II)]⁻ anions connected through the two three‐atom thio­cyanate (μ‐NCS) and the two anti,anti‐μ‐­carboxyl­ate bridges into infinite one‐dimensional polymeric anions, with coulombically interacting K⁺ counter‐ions with coordination number 7 constrained between the chains. The Cu^II atoms adopt a distorted tetragonal–bipyramidal coordination, with three donor atoms of the tridentate Schiff base and one N atom of the bridging μ‐NCS ligand in the basal plane. The first axial position is occupied by a thio­cyanate S atom of a symmetry‐related μ‐NCS ligand at an apical distance of 2.9770 (8) Å, and the second position is occupied by an O atom of a bridging carboxyl­ate group from an adjacent coordination unit at a distance of 2.639 (2) Å.     

2(S)‐Amino‐3‐[1H‐imidazol‐4(5)‐yl]­propyl cyclo­hexylmethyl ether di­hydro­chloride and 2(S)‐amino‐3‐[1H‐imidazol‐4(5)‐yl]­propyl 4‐bromo­benzyl ether di­hydro­chloride

(Cyclo­hexyl­methyl­oxy­methyl)(1H‐imidazol‐4‐io­methyl)‐(S)‐ammonium dichloride, C₁₃H₂₅N₃O⁺·2Cl^?, and (4‐bromo­benzyl)(1H‐imidazol‐4‐io­methyl)‐(S)‐ammonium dichloride, C₁₃H₁₈BrN₃O⁺·2Cl^?, are model compounds with different biological activities for evaluation of the hist­amine H3‐receptor activation mechanism. Both title compounds occur in almost similar extended conformations.     

1,N6‐Etheno derivative of 7‐de­aza‐2,8‐di­aza­adenosine

In the tricyclic nucleoside 7‐(β‐d ‐ribo­furan­osyl)‐7H‐imidazo­[1,2‐c]­pyrazolo­[4,3‐e][1,2,3]­triazine, C₁₁H₁₂N₆O₄, the con­formation of the N‐gly­cosyl bond is intermediate between anti and high anti [χ = −103.5 (3)°]. The ribo­furan­ose moiety adopts a ₃T² sugar pucker (S‐type sugar) and the conformation at the exocyclic C—C bond is ap (gauche–trans). Molecules of the title compound form a three‐dimensional network via three medium–strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds (one O—H⋯N and two O—H⋯O bonds).