Methyl 3‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)prop‐2‐enoate

The title mol­ecule, C₁₁H₁₂O₃, is almost planar, with an average deviation of the C and O atoms from the least‐squares plane of 0.146 (4) Å. The geometry about the C=C bond is trans. The phenyl ring and –COOCH₃ group are twisted with respect to the double bond by 9.3 (3) and 5.6 (5)°, respectively. The endocyclic angle at the junction of the propenoate group and the phenyl ring is decreased from 120° by 2.6 (2)°, whereas two neighbouring angles around the ring are increased by 2.3 (2) and 0.9 (2)°. This is probably associated with the charge‐transfer interaction of the phenyl ring and –COOCH₃ group through the C=C double bond. The mol­ecules are joined together through C—H?O hydrogen bonds between the methoxy and ester groups to form characteristic zigzag chains extended along the c axis.     

1‐(4‐Bromo­phenyl)‐3‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)­prop‐2‐en‐1‐one

In the mol­ecule of the title compound, C₁₆H₁₃BrO, the two benzene rings are rotated in opposite directions with respect to the central C—C=C—C part of the mol­ecule. The phenone O atom deviates from the least‐squares plane of the mol­ecule by 0.300 (3) Å. In the crystal structure, mol­ecules are paired through C—H⋯π interactions. The molecular pairs along [001] are hydrogen bonded through three translation‐related co‐operative hydrogen bonds in the `bay area', forming molecular chains, which are further hydrogen bonded through C—H⋯Br weak interactions, forming (010) molecular layers. In the third direction, there are only weak van der Waals interactions. The co‐operative hydrogen bonds in the `bay area' are discussed briefly.     

(1E)‐2‐(Di­acetyl­amino)‐1‐methyl­prop‐­1‐enyl acetate

The analysis of the title compound, C₁₀H₁₅NO₄, firmly establishes the configuration of the double bond as E, a stereochemistry that had been assigned tentatively by other methods. The di­acetyl­amine and acetate substituents are approximately coplanar to one another, but approximately perpendicular to the planar ethene core. H atoms of the ethene methyl substituents are found within the ethene plane, indicating that hyperconjugation does not play an important role in stabilizing the double bond.     

(E)‐Ethyl 3‐(3,4‐dihydroxyphenyl)prop‐2‐enoate: a natural polymorph extracted from Aristotelia chilensis (Maqui)

The natural title compound, C₁₁H₁₂O₄, extracted from the Chilean native tree Aristotelia chilensis (Maqui), is a polymorph of the synthetic E form reported by Xia, Hu & Rao [Acta Cryst. (2004), E 60 , o913–o914]. Both rotational conformers are identical from a metrical point of view, and only differ in the orientation of the 3,4‐dihydroxyphenyl ring with respect to the rest of the molecule, which leads to completely different crystal structure arrangements and packing efficiencies. The reasons behind both reside in the different hydrogen‐bonding interactions.     

2‐(Nitro­methyl­ene)‐1,3‐dithietane

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C₃H₃NO₂S₂, the four‐membered C₂S₂ ring is planar, as is the whole mol­ecule. The short intramolecular S?O distance of 2.687 (2) Å shows the five‐atom system to be conjugated. The mol­ecules pack as a two‐dimensional network in the (010) plane through short intermolecular S?O [2.900 (2) and 3.077 (2) Å] interactions.     

4,6‐Di­chloro‐2‐(methyl­thio)­pyrimidine

The structure of the title compound, C₃₀H₂₄Cl₁₂N₁₂S₆, (I), comprises six symmetry unique mol­ecules that vary only slightly in their N—C—S—C torsion angle. All the mol­ecules are planar to within less than 3.1°.     

Ethyl N‐[2‐(hydroxy­acetyl)­phenyl]­carbamate,ethyl N‐[2‐(hydroxy­acetyl)‐4‐iodo­phenyl]­carbamate and ethyl N‐[2‐(hydroxy­acetyl)‐4‐methyl­phenyl]­carbamate

In ethyl N‐[2‐(hydroxy­acetyl)phenyl]carbamate, C₁₁H₁₃NO₄, all of the non‐H atoms lie on a mirror plane in the space group Pnma; the mol­ecules are linked into simple chains by a single C—H⋯O hydrogen bond. The mol­ecules of ethyl N‐[2‐(hydroxy­acetyl)‐4‐iodo­phenyl]carbamate, C₁₁H₁₂INO₄, are linked into sheets by a combination of O—H⋯I and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and a dipolar I⋯O contact. Ethyl N‐­[2‐(hydroxy­acetyl)‐4‐methyl­phenyl]carbamate, C₁₂H₁₅NO₄, crystallizes with Z′ = 2 in the space group P; pairs of mol­ecules are weakly linked by an O—H⋯O hydrogen bond and these aggregates are linked into chains by two independent aromatic π–π stacking inter­actions.     

1‐[2‐(1‐Hydroxy­cyclo­hexyl)‐2‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)­ethyl]­di­methyl­ammon­ium chloride (venlafaxine hydro­chloride)

The crystal structure of racemic Venlafaxine hydro­chloride, C₁₇H₂₈NO₂⁺·Cl^?, consists of two types of parallel chains formed by translated Venlafaxine⁺ cations, hydrogen bonded by Cl^? anions, and characterized by the opposite chirality of their constituent mol­ecules. These chains organize in two different types of broad layers of opposite handedness, related by a glide plane.     

2‐Chloro‐3‐(dimethylamino)prop‐2‐enoyl Fluoride,a Stable Acyl Fluoride

The title compound is formed as a side‐product in the reaction of CF₃CCl₃ with Zn/DMF and dimethyl(thexyl)silyl chloride (=dimethyl(1,1,2‐trimethylpropyl)silyl chloride). The structure and the double‐bond configuration are deduced from its ¹³C‐NMR data. Its formation is discussed in terms of a Vilsmeier‐type formylation and a reductive elimination.     

N‐(4‐Methyl­phenyl)‐N‐(5‐nitro­furfuryl)‐N‐prop‐2‐ynyl­amine

The title compound, C₁₅H₁₄N₂O₃, is the first example of a structurally determined tertiary amine with both N‐5‐nitro­furfuryl and N‐prop‐2‐ynyl moieties. The mol­ecule is not planar, i.e. the furan ring is inclined at an angle of 84.35 (4)° to the phenyl ring. The crystal structure is dominated by van der Waals forces. The terminal alkynyl group as the strongest C—H hydrogen‐bond donor is not involved in hydrogen‐bond formation.     

Dichloro­(O‐ethyl 3‐methyl­pyridine‐2‐carboximidic acid‐κ2N,N′)copper(II)

In the title compound, [CuCl₂(C₉H₁₂N₂O)], the Cu^II atom is coordinated by two Cl⁻ anions and two N atoms of one O‐ethyl 3‐methyl­pyridine‐2‐carboximidic acid mol­ecule in a slightly distorted square‐planar geometry, with Cu—N distances of 2.0483 (17) and 1.9404 (18) Å, and Cu—Cl distances of 2.2805 (10) and 2.2275 (14) Å. In addition, each Cu^II atom is connected by one Cl⁻ anion and the Cu^II atom from a neighbouring mol­ecule, with Cu⋯Cl and Cu⋯Cu distances of 2.9098 (13) and 3.4022 (12) Å, respectively, and, therefore, a centrosymmetric dimer is formed. Adjacent mol­ecular dimers are connected by π–π stacking inter­actions between pyridine rings to form a zigzag mol­ecular chain. The mol­ecular chains are also enforced by N—H⋯Cl and C—H⋯Cl inter­actions.     

1‐(2‐Hydroxy‐4,6‐di­methyl­phenyl)­ethanone

In the crystal of the title compound, C₁₀H₁₂O₂, there are two symmetry‐independent mol­ecules, which are essentially superimposable. Each mol­ecule exhibits an intramolecular O—H?O hydrogen bond, with O?O separations of 2.483 (4) and 2.468 (4) Å.     

1‐(2′‐Anilinyl)prop‐2‐yn‐1‐ol Rearrangement for Oxindole Synthesis

A synthetic method that relies on NIS (N‐iodosuccinimide)‐mediated cycloisomerization reactions of 1‐(2′‐anilinyl)prop‐2‐yn‐1‐ols to gem‐3‐(diiodomethyl)indolin‐2‐ones and 2‐(iodomethylene)indolin‐3‐ones has been developed. The reactions were shown to be chemoselective, with secondary and tertiary alcoholic substrates exclusively giving the 3‐ and 2‐oxindole products, respectively. In the case of the latter, the transformation features an unprecedented double 1,2‐OH and 1,2‐alkyl migration relay. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations based on proposed iodoaminocyclization species provide insight into this unique divergence in product selectivity.     

3‐Methoxy‐5‐(4‐methyl­phenyl­diazenyl)­salicyl­aldehyde and 3‐methoxy‐5‐(2‐methyl­phenyl­diazenyl)­salicyl­aldehyde

The two title mol­ecules, both C₁₅H₁₄N₂O₃, are roughly planar and display a trans conformation with respect to the –N=N– double bond, as found for other diazene derivatives. In both compounds, there are intramolecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and the crystal packing is governed by weak intermolecular C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and π–π stacking.     

Diethyl (Z,Z)‐3,3′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diyldiimino)dibut‐2‐enoate

The title compound, C₁₄H₂₄N₂O₄, is an intermediate in the synthesis of the corresponding heterocyclic compounds. The mol­ecule lies about a twofold axis and has a `twist' conformation; it adopts the Z,Z configuration, which is shown to be governed mainly by intramolecular hydrogen bonds.     

The E and Z isomers of 3‐(benzoxazol‐2‐yl)­prop‐2‐enoic acid

The carboxyl­ic acid group and the double bond are coplanar in (E)‐3‐(benzoxazol‐2‐yl)­prop‐2‐enoic acid, C₁₀H₇NO₃, whereas in isomeric (Z)‐3‐(benzoxazol‐2‐yl)­prop‐2‐enoic acid, also C₁₀H₇NO₃, they are almost orthogonal. In both isomers, a strong O—H⋯N hydrogen bond, with the carboxyl­ic acid group as a donor and the pyridine‐like N atom as an acceptor, and weak C—H⋯O interactions contribute to the observed supramolecular structures, which are completed by π–π stacking interactions between oxazole and benzenoid rings.     

Polymorphism of (Z)‐4‐bromo‐N‐(pent‐2‐enyl)‐N‐(3‐phenyl­prop‐2‐ynyl)benzene­sulfonamide

The title compound, C₂₀H₂₀BrNO₂S, has two polymorphic crystal structures with very similar lattice constants. A number of crystals are composites of the two polymorphs. Both crystal structures contain identical layers of mol­ecules. The packing of the layers, however, is different for the two polymorphs.     

Activity and stability spontaneously enhanced toward ethylene polymerization by employing 2‐(1‐(2,4‐dibenzhydrylnaphthylimino)ethyl)‐6‐(1‐(arylimino)ethyl) pyridyliron(II) dichlorides

A series of 2‐(1‐(2,4‐dibenzhydrylnaphthylimino)ethyl)‐6‐(1‐(arylimino)ethyl)pyridyliron(II) complexes ( Fe1 ? Fe5 ) was synthesized and characterized. The molecular structure of the representative Fe2 was determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, revealing a distorted pseudo‐square‐pyramidal geometry around the iron center. On activation with either methylaluminoxane (MAO) or modified methylaluminoxane (MMAO), all these iron complex precatalysts performed with high activities (up to 1.58 × 10⁷ g (PE) mol^?1 (Fe) h^?1) toward ethylene polymerization, producing highly linear polyethylenes with high molecular weight and bimodal distribution, which was in accordance with high temperature ¹³C NMR, high T _m values (T _m ～130 °C) and the GPC curves of the obtained polyethylenes. Meanwhile, DFT calculation results also showed the good correlation between net charges on iron and experimental activities. Compared with previous bis(imino)pyridyliron analogues, the current iron complexes containing the benzhydrylnaphthyl groups exhibited relatively higher activities and better thermal‐stability at elevated temperatures, especially at 80 °C as the industrial operating temperature, and still showed high activities toward ethylene polymerization up to 8.57 × 10⁶ g (PE) mol^?1 (Fe) h^?1 in the presence of co‐catalyst MMAO. In addition, these iron complex precatalysts all exhibited long lifetimes. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017 , 55 , 988–996     

4,5‐Bis­(ferrocenyl­methyl­thio)‐1,3‐di­thiol‐2‐one

In the compound 4,5‐bis­(ferrocenyl­methyl­thio)‐1,3‐di­thiol‐2‐one, [Fe₂(C₅H₅)₂(C₁₅H₁₂OS₄)], the values of the geometric parameters of the ferrocene and 1,3‐di­thiol‐2‐one (dmio) moieties are within normal ranges. The dmio group is essentially planar. There are no short S?S contacts.