Identification of the Structural Boundary between [Ln(18‐crown‐6)(NO3)3] and [Ln(NO3)3(H2O)3] · 18‐crown‐6 Motifs in the Lanthanide Series

Recrystallization of Ln(NO₃)₃ (Ln = Sm, Eu, Yb) in the presence of 18‐crown‐6 under aqueous conditions yielded [Ln(NO₃)₃(H₂O)₃] · 18‐crown‐6. X‐ray crystallography revealed isomorphous structures for each of the lanthanide complexes where [Ln(NO₃)₃(H₂O)₃] is involved in hydrogen bonding interactions with 18‐crown‐6. The transition point where the structural motif changes from [Ln(18‐crown‐6)(NO₃)₃] (with the metal residing in the crown cavity) to [Ln(NO₃)₃(H₂O)₃] · 18‐crown‐6 has been identified as at the Nd/Sm interface. A similar investigation involving [Ln(tos)₃(H₂O)₆] (tos = p‐toluenesulfonate) and 18‐crown‐6 were resistant to crown incorporation. X‐ray studies show extensive intra‐ and intermolecular hydrogen bonding is present.     

Controlled Synthesis of Heterotrimetallic Single‐Chain Magnets from Anisotropic High‐Spin 3 d–4 f Nodes and Paramagnetic Spacers

By using the node‐and‐spacer approach in suitable solvents, four new heterotrimetallic 1D chain‐like compounds (that is, containing 3d–3d′–4f metal ions), {[Ni(L)Ln(NO₃)₂(H₂O)Fe(Tp*)(CN)₃] ? 2 CH₃CN ? CH₃OH}_n (H₂L=N,N′‐bis(3‐methoxysalicylidene)‐1,3‐diaminopropane, Tp*=hydridotris(3,5‐dimethylpyrazol‐1‐yl)borate; Ln=Gd ( 1 ), Dy ( 2 ), Tb ( 3 ), Nd ( 4 )), have been synthesized and structurally characterized. All of these compounds are made up of a neutral cyanide‐ and phenolate‐bridged heterotrimetallic chain, with a {? Fe? C?N? Ni(? O? Ln)? N?C? }_n repeat unit. Within these chains, each [(Tp*)Fe(CN)₃]^? entity binds to the Ni^II ion of the [Ni(L)Ln(NO₃)₂(H₂O)]⁺ motif through two of its three cyanide groups in a cis mode, whereas each [Ni(L)Ln(NO₃)₂(H₂O)]⁺ unit is linked to two [(Tp*)Fe(CN)₃]^? ions through the Ni^II ion in a trans mode. In the [Ni(L)Ln(NO₃)₂(H₂O)]⁺ unit, the Ni^II and Ln^III ions are bridged to one other through two phenolic oxygen atoms of the ligand (L). Compounds 1 – 4 are rare examples of 1D cyanide‐ and phenolate‐bridged 3d–3d′–4f helical chain compounds. As expected, strong ferromagnetic interactions are observed between neighboring Fe^III and Ni^II ions through a cyanide bridge and between neighboring Ni^II and Ln^III (except for Nd^III) ions through two phenolate bridges. Further magnetic studies show that all of these compounds exhibit single‐chain magnetic behavior. Compound 2 exhibits the highest effective energy barrier (58.2 K) for the reversal of magnetization in 3d/4d/5d–4f heterotrimetallic single‐chain magnets.     

The Stereochemical Activity of the Lone Pair in [Bi(NO3)3{(iPrO)2(O)PCH2P(O)(OiPr)2}2] — Comparison of Bismuth,Lanthanum and Praseodymium Nitrate Complexes

Five coordination compounds of bismuth, lanthanum and praseodymium nitrate with the oxygen‐coordinating chelate ligand (ⁱPrO)₂(O)PCH₂P(O)(OⁱPr)₂ (L) are reported: [Bi(NO₃)₃(L)₂] ( 1 ), [La(NO₃)₃(L)₂] ( 2 ), [Pr(NO₃)₃(L)₂] ( 3 ), [La(NO₃)₃(L)(H₂O)] ( 4 ) and [Pr(NO₃)₃(L)(H₂O)] ( 5 ). The compounds were characterized by means of single crystal X‐ray crystallography, ¹H and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy in solution, solid‐state ³¹P NMR spectroscopy, IR spectroscopy, DTA‐TG measurements ( 1 , 2 and 4 ), conductometry and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI‐MS). In addition, DFT calculations for model compounds of 1 and 2 support our experimental work. In the solid state mononuclear coordination compounds were observed for 1 — 3 , whereas compounds 4 and 5 gave one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded polymers via water‐nitrate coordination. Despite of the similar ionic radii of bismuth(III), lanthanum(III) and praseodymium(III) for a given coordination number the bismuth and lanthanide compounds 1 — 3 are not isostructural. The bismuth compound 1 shows a 9‐coordinate bismuth atom whereas lanthanum(III) and praseodymium(III) atoms are 10‐coordinate in the lanthanide complexes 2 — 5 . The general LnO₁₀ coordination motif in compounds 2 — 5 is best described as a distorted bi‐capped square antiprism. The BiO₉ polyhedron might be deduced from the LnO₁₀ polyhedron by replacing one oxygen ligand with a stereochemically active lone pair. The one‐to‐one complexes 4 and 5 dissociate in solution to give the corresponding one‐to‐two complexes 2 and 3 , respectively, and solvated Ln(NO₃)₃. In contrast to the lanthanides, the one‐to‐two bismuth complex 1 is less stable in CH₃CN solution and partially dissociates to give solvated Bi(NO₃)₃ and (ⁱPrO)₂(O)PCH₂P(O)(OⁱPr)₂.     

Electrospray Mass Spectrometry Study on Polynuclear Pd(II) and Ni (II) Complexes of 3, 6, 9, 16, 19, 22‐Hexaazatricyclo [22. 2.2.211,14] triaconta‐11, 13, 24, 26 (1), 27, 29‐Hexaene

Polynuclear Pd(II) and Ni(II) complexes of macrocyclic polyamine 3,6,9,16,19,22‐hexaazatricyclo[22.2.2.2^11,14]‐triaconta 11,13,24,26(l),27,29‐hexaene (L) in solution were investigated by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESIMS). For methanol solution of complexes M₂LX₄ (M = Pd(II) and Ni(II), X= Cl and I), two main clusters of peaks were observed which can be assigned to [M₂LX₃]⁺ and [M₂LX₂]²⁺. When Pd₂LCl₄ was treated with 2 or 4 mol of AgNO₃, it gave rise formation of Pd₂LCl₂ (NO₃)₂ · H₂O and [Pd₂L(H₂O)_m(NO₃)_n]^(4‐n)+, respectively. ESMS spectra show that the dissociation of the former in the ionization process gave peaks of [Pd₂LCl₂]²⁺ and [(Pd₂LCl₂)NO₃]⁺, while dissociation of the later gave the peaks of [Pd₂L(CH₃CO₂)₂]²⁺ and [Pd₂L(CH₃CO₂)₂](NO₃) ⁺ in the presence of acetic acid. Similar species were observed for Pd₂LI₄ when treated with 4 mol of AgNO₃. When [Pd₂L · (H₂O)_m(NO₃)_n]^(4‐n)+ reacted with 2 mol of oxalate anions at 40°C, [Pd₄L₂(C₂O₄)₂(NO₃)₂]²⁺ and [Pd₄L₂(C₂O₄)₂ (NO₃)]³⁺ were detected. This implies the formation of square‐planar molecular box Pd₄L₂(C₂O₄)₂(NO₃)₄ in which C₂O₄^? may act as bridging ligands as confirmed by crystal structure analysis. The dissociation form and the stability of complex cations in gaseous state are also discussed. This work provides an excellent example of the usefulness of ESIMS in the identification of metal complexes in solution.     

Hexaaquacobalt(II) and hexaaquanickel(II) bis(μ‐pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylato)bis[(pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylato)bismuthate(III)] dihydrate

The title complexes, hexaaquacobalt(II) bis(μ‐pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylato)bis[(pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylato)bismuthate(III)] dihydrate, [Co(H₂O)₆][Bi₂(C₇H₄NO₄)₄]·2H₂O, (I), and hexaaquanickel(II) bis(μ‐pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylato)bis[(pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylato)bismuthate(III)] dihydrate, [Ni(H₂O)₆][Bi₂(C₇H₄NO₄)₄]·2H₂O, (II), are isomorphous and crystallize in the triclinic space group P. The transition metal ions are located on the inversion centre and adopt slightly distorted MO₆ (M = Co or Ni) octahedral geometries. Two [Bi(pydc)₂]⁻ units (pydc is pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylate) are linked via bridging carboxylate groups into centrosymmetric [Bi₂(pydc)₄]²⁻ dianions. The crystal packing reveals that the [M(H₂O)₆]²⁺ cations, [Bi₂(pydc)₄]²⁻ anions and solvent water molecules form multiple hydrogen bonds to generate a supramolecular three‐dimensional network. The formation of secondary Bi...O bonds between adjacent [Bi₂(pydc)₄]²⁻ dimers provides an additional supramolecular synthon that directs and facilitates the crystal packing of both (I) and (II).     

Copper(II) and Cadmium(II) Complexes Based on N,N‐Bis(3, 5‐dimethyl‐2‐hydroxybenzyl)‐N‐(2‐pyridylmethyl)amine Ligand: Syntheses,Structures, Magnetic,and Luminescent Properties

The reaction of the aryl‐oxide ligand H₂L [H₂L = N,N‐bis(3, 5‐dimethyl‐2‐hydroxybenzyl)‐N‐(2‐pyridylmethyl)amine] with CuSO₄ · 5H₂O, CuCl₂ · 2H₂O, CuBr₂, CdCl₂ · 2.5H₂O, and Cd(OAc)₂ · 2H₂O, respectively, under hydrothermal conditions gave the complexes [Cu(H₂L¹)₂] · SO₄ · 3CH₃OH ( 1 ), [Cu₂(H₂L²)₂Cl₄] ( 2 ), [Cu₂(H₂L²)₂Br₄] ( 3 ), [Cd₂(HL)₂Cl₂] ( 4 ), and [Cd₂(L)₂(CH₃COOH)₂] · H₂L ( 5 ), where H₂L¹ [H₂L¹ = 2, 4‐dimethyl‐6‐((pyridin‐2‐ylmethylamino)methyl)phenol] and H₂L² [H₂L² = 2‐(2, 4‐dimethyl‐6‐((pyridin‐2‐ylmethylamino)methyl)phenoxy)‐4, 6‐dimethylphenol] were derived from the solvothermal in situ metal/ligand reactions. These complexes were characterized by IR spectroscopy, elementary analysis, and X‐ray diffraction. A low‐temperature magnetic susceptibility measurement for the solid sample of 2 revealed antiferromagnetic interactions between two central copper(II) atoms. The emission property studies for complexes 4 and 5 indicated strong luminescence emission.     

2‐Amino‐5‐(2‐pyridyl)‐thiadiazole as Bidentate Ligand

The amino substituted bidentate chelating ligand 2‐amino‐5‐(2‐pyridyl)‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole (H₂ L ) was used to prepare 3:1‐type coordination compounds of iron(II), cobalt(II) and nickel(II). In the iron(II) perchlorate complex [Fe^II(H₂ L )₃](ClO₄)₂·0.6MeOH·0.9H₂O a 1:1 mixture of mer and fac isomers is present whereas [Fe^II(H₂ L )₃](BF₄)₂·MeOH·H₂O, [Co^II(H₂ L )₃](ClO₄)₂·2H₂O and [Ni^II(H₂ L )₃](ClO₄)₂·MeOH·H₂O feature merely mer derivatives. Moessbauer spectroscopy and variable temperature magnetic measurements revealed the [Fe^II(H₂ L )₃]²⁺ complex core to exist in the low‐spin state, whereas the [Co^II(H₂ L )₃]²⁺ complex core resides in its high‐spin state, even at very low temperatures.     

Cobalt(II) and cadmium(II) square grids supported with 4,4′‐bipyrazole and accommodating 3‐carboxyadamantane‐1‐carboxylate

In poly[[bis(μ‐4,4′‐bi‐1H‐pyrazole‐κ²N²:N^2′)bis(3‐carboxyadamantane‐1‐carboxylato‐κO¹)cobalt(II)] dihydrate], {[Co(C₁₂H₁₅O₄)₂(C₆H₆N₄)₂]·2H₂O}_n, (I), the Co²⁺ cation lies on an inversion centre and the 4,4′‐bipyrazole (4,4′‐bpz) ligands are also situated across centres of inversion. In its non‐isomorphous cadmium analogue, {[Cd(C₁₂H₁₅O₄)₂(C₆H₆N₄)₂]·2H₂O}_n, (II), the Cd²⁺ cation lies on a twofold axis. In both compounds, the metal cations adopt an octahedral coordination, with four pyrazole N atoms in the equatorial plane [Co—N = 2.156 (2) and 2.162 (2) Å; Cd—N = 2.298 (2) and 2.321 (2) Å] and two axial carboxylate O atoms [Co—O = 2.1547 (18) Å and Cd—O = 2.347 (2) Å]. In both structures, interligand hydrogen bonding [N...O = 2.682 (3)–2.819 (3) Å] is essential for stabilization of the MN₄O₂ environment with its unusually high (for bulky adamantanecarboxylates) number of coordinated N‐donor co‐ligands. The compounds adopt two‐dimensional coordination connectivities and exist as square‐grid [M(4,4′‐bpz)₂]_n networks accommodating monodentate carboxylate ligands. The interlayer linkage is provided by hydrogen bonds from the carboxylic acid groups via the solvent water molecules [O...O = 2.565 (3) and 2.616 (3) Å] to the carboxylate groups in the next layer [O...O = 2.717 (3)–2.841 (3) Å], thereby extending the structures in the third dimension.     

Nitrogen‐Rich Compounds of the Lanthanoids: The 5,5′‐Azobis[1H‐tetrazol‐1‐ides] of some Yttric Earths (Tb,Dy, Ho,Er, Tm,Yb, and Lu)

A set of N‐rich salts, 3 – 9 , of the heavy lanthanoids (terbium, 3 ; dysprosium, 4 ; holmium 5 ; erbium, 6 ; thulium, 7 ; ytterbium, 8 ; lutetium, 9 ) based on the energetic 5,5′‐azobis[1H‐tetrazole] (H₂ZT) was synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, vibrational (IR and Raman) spectroscopy, and X‐ray structure determination. The synthesis of the lanthanoid salts 3 – 9 was performed by crystallization from concentrated aqueous solutions of disodium 5,5′‐azobis[1H‐tetrazol‐1‐ide] dihydrate (Na₂ZT?2 H₂O; 1 ) and the respective Ln(NO₃)₃?5 H₂O and yielded large rhombic crystals of the type [Ln(H₂O)₈]₂(ZT)₃?6 H₂O in ca. 70% of the theoretical yield. The compounds 3 – 9 are isostructural (triclinic space group P ) to the previously published yttrium salt 2 ; they show, however, a clear lanthanoid contraction of several crystallographic parameters, e.g., the cell volume or the Ln? O bond lengths of the Ln³⁺ ions and the coordinating H₂O molecules. The lanthanoid contraction influences the strengths of the H‐bonds, which can be observed as a red shift by 4 cm^?1 in the characteristic IR band, in particular from 3595 cm^?1 ( 3 ) to 3599 cm^?1 ( 9 ). In good agreement with previous works, 2 – 9 are purely salt‐like compounds without a coordinative bond between the tetrazolide anion and the Ln³⁺ cation.     

Counterion‐Directed Assembly of Praseodymium(III) Compounds based on the Flexible Ligand 5‐Aminotetrazole‐1‐propionic Acid (Hatzp)

Different kinds of counterions (such as NO₃^–, ClO₄^–, and Cl^–) play a special role in controlling the framework of coordination compounds. Using this strategy, 5‐aminotetrazole‐1‐propionic acid (Hatzp) was selected to react with praseodymium(III) nitrate or perchlorate in the same solvent system, producing two different coordination compounds, [Pr₂(atzp)₄(H₂O)₈] · 2NO₃ · 2H₂O ( 1 ) and [Pr₂(atzp)₆(H₂O)₂] · H₂O ( 2 ). These compounds were structurally characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. X‐ray diffraction analysis revealed that compound 1 displays a dinuclear structure, whereas 2 shows a one dimensional zigzag chain framework. Furthermore, the luminescence properties of compounds 1 and 2 were investigated at room temperature in the solid state.     

Synthesis,crystal structures and luminescence properties of seven mononuclear zinc(II), cadmium(II), cobalt(II) and nickel(II) complexes with 5‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazole

Due to their versatile coordination modes and metal‐binding conformations, triazolyl ligands can provide a wide range of possibilities for the construction of supramolecular structures. Seven mononuclear transition metal complexes with different structural forms, namely aquabis[3‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazolato‐κ²N ¹,N ⁵]zinc(II), [Zn(C₁₄H₁₁N₄)₂(H₂O)], (I), bis[5‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazole‐κ²N ³,N ⁴]bis(nitrato‐κO )zinc(II), [Zn(NO₃)₂(C₁₄H₁₂N₄)₂], (II), bis(methanol‐κO )bis[3‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazolato‐κ²N ¹,N ⁵]zinc(II), [Zn(C₁₄H₁₁N₄)₂(CH₄O)₂], (III), diiodidobis[5‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazole‐κ²N ³,N ⁴]cadmium(II), [CdI₂(C₁₄H₁₂N₄)₂], (IV), bis[5‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazole‐κ²N ³,N ⁴]bis(nitrato‐κO )cadmium(II), [Cd(NO₃)₂(C₁₄H₁₂N₄)₂], (V), aquabis[3‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazolato‐κ²N ¹,N ⁵]cobalt(II), [Co(C₁₄H₁₁N₄)₂(H₂O)], (VI), and diaquabis[3‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazolato‐κ²N ¹,N ⁵]nickel(II), [Ni(C₁₄H₁₁N₄)₂(H₂O)₂], (VII), have been prepared by the reaction of transition metal salts (Zn^II, Cd^II, Co^II and Ni^II) with 3‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazole (pymphtzH) under either ambient or hydrothermal conditions. These compounds have been characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. All the complexes form three‐dimensional supramolecular structures through hydrogen bonds or through π–π stacking interactions between the centroids of the pyridyl or arene rings. The pymphtzH and pymphtz⁻ entities act as bidentate coordinating ligands in each structure. Moreover, all the pyridyl N atoms are coordinated to metal atoms (Zn, Cd, Co or Ni). The N atom in the 4‐position of the triazole group is coordinated to the Zn and Cd atoms in the crystal structures of (II), (IV) and (V), while the N atom in the 1‐position of the triazolate group is coordinated to the Zn, Co and Ni atoms in (I), (III), (VI) and (VII).     

Hepta­aqua­tetra‐μ3‐hydroxy‐hexa‐μ2‐l‐leucine‐(l‐leucine)­tetraytterbium(III) tetrachlorozinc(II) tri­chloro­hydroxyzinc(II) tetrachloride octahydrate

The title bimetallic compound, [Yb₄(μ₃‐OH)₄(C₆H₁₃NO₂)₇(H₂O)₇][ZnCl₄][ZnCl₃(OH)]Cl₄·8H₂O, was synthesized at near physiological pH (6.0). The compound exhibits some novel structural features, including an asymmetric [Yb₄(μ₃‐OH)₄(l ‐leucine)₇(H₂O)₇]⁸⁺ complex cation in which four OH groups act as bridging ligands, linking four Yb³⁺ cations into a Yb₄O₄ structural unit. Each pair of adjacent Yb³⁺ ions is further bridged by one carboxy group from a leucine ligand. Water mol­ecules and a monodentate leucine ligand also coordinate to Yb³⁺ ions, completing their eight‐coordinate square‐antiprismatic coordination. The Yb₄(μ₃‐OH)₄(l ‐leu­cine)₇(H₂O)₇]⁸⁺ cation, the [ZnCl₄]²⁻, [ZnCl₃OH]²⁻ and Cl⁻ anions, and the lattice water mol­ecules are linked via hydrogen bonds.     

Two two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded coordination networks: bis(3‐carboxybenzoato‐κO)bis(4‐methyl‐1H‐imidazole‐κN3)copper(II) and bis(3‐methylbenzoato‐κN)bis(4‐methyl‐1H‐imidazole‐κN3)copper(II) monohydrate

The title two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded coordination compounds, [Cu(C₈H₅O₄)₂(C₄H₆N₂)₂], (I), and [Cu(C₈H₇O₂)₂(C₄H₆N₂)₂]·H₂O, (II), have been synthesized and structurally characterized. The molecule of complex (I) lies across an inversion centre, and the Cu²⁺ ion is coordinated by two N atoms from two 4‐methyl‐1H‐imidazole (4‐MeIM) molecules and two O atoms from two 3‐carboxybenzoate (HBDC⁻) anions in a square‐planar geometry. Adjacent molecules are linked through intermolecular N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds into a two‐dimensional sheet with (4,4) topology. In the asymmetric part of the unit cell of (II) there are two symmetry‐independent molecules, in which each Cu²⁺ ion is also coordinated by two N atoms from two 4‐MeIM molecules and two O atoms from two 3‐methylbenzoate (3‐MeBC⁻) anions in a square‐planar coordination. Two neutral complex molecules are held together via N—H...O(carboxylate) hydrogen bonds to generate a dimeric pair, which is further linked via discrete water molecules into a two‐dimensional network with the Schläfli symbol (4³)₂(4⁶,6⁶,8³). In both compounds, as well as the strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds, π–π interactions also stabilize the crystal stacking.     

Synthesis,Characterization, and Magnetic Behaviour of Dinuclear Nickel(II) Complexes of N,N′‐Substituted Dithiooxamides derived from α‐Amino Acids

New dinuclear complexes of the types [Ni₂(L)(H₂O)₂] and [Ni₂(L)(H₂O)₆] [H₄L = N,N′‐bis(carboxymethyl) dithiooxamide (H₄GLYDTO), N,N′‐bis(1‐carboxyethyl) dithiooxamide (H₄ALADTO), N,N′‐bis(1‐carboxy‐2‐methylpropyl) dithiooxamide (H₄VALDTO) and N,N′‐bis(1‐carboxy‐3‐methylbutyl) dithiooxamide (H₄LEUDTO)] have been prepared and characterized by IR and electronic absorption spectroscopy, and the structure of [Ni₂(ALADTO)(H₂O)₆] crystals has been determined by single crystal X‐ray analysis. This compound is composed of discrete dinuclear units in which two Ni^II atoms with NO₄S kernels are linked by a single [ALADTO]^4– group that coordinates through its carboxylato oxygen, amino nitrogen and thiolato sulphur atoms. In each dimer unit the two nickel(II) ions in distorted octahedral coordination are separated by 5.863(2) Å The temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility of the new compounds was measured over the range 2 to 300 K. In the complexes of [GLYDTO]^4– and [ALADTO]^4– the two Ni atoms are antiferromagnetically coupled, with J = –23.51(4) and –20.95(8) cm^–1, respectively. By constrast, [Ni₂(VALDTO)(H₂O)₂], [Ni₂(VALDTO)(H₂O)₆] and [Ni₂(LEUDTO)(H₂O)₂] remain paramagnetic down to 2 K, with magnetic moment values between 2.8 and 3.3 M.B.     

Hexanuclear and Tetranuclear Mn/Ln clusters using 2‐(hydroxymethyl)pyridine: Synthesis,structures and magnetic properties

Reactions of manganese benzoate dihydrate and lanthanide nitrate hexahydrate with 2‐(hydroxymethyl)pyridine (hmpH) as ligand in the mixture solutions of acetonitrile and ethanol according to different molar ratios of NEt₃ generated two kinds of Mn‐Ln compounds [Mn^III₄La^III₂(O)₂(hmp)₇(PhCO₂)₂(NO₃)₅] ·5H₂O ( 1 ) and [Mn^III₂Gd^III₂(hmp)₆(PhCO₂)₄(NO₃)₂] ·3CH₃CN·3C₂H₅OH·2H₂O ( 2 ). By comparison of the two compounds, there exist considerable effects of reaction alkalinity on the structures and magnetic properties of products. Compound 1 possesses a core of [Mn^III₄La^III₂(μ ₄‐O)(μ ₃‐O)(μ ₃‐OR)(μ ₂‐O)₇]²⁻, which comprises three face‐sharing defected cubane units. The core topology represents a new core type of Mn‐Ln clusters. Compound 2 has a planar‐butterfly structure. The solid‐state dc magnetic susceptibility analyses indicate the antiferromagnetic interactions within compound 1 and ferromagnetic interactions within compound 2 . Compound 1 has an S  = 0 ground state, while compound 2 possesses an S  = 11 ground state, fitting of the dc data for the tetranuclear Mn₂Gd₂ with the Magpack program gives parameters of J _Mn‐Mn  = 3.11 cm⁻¹, J _Mn‐Gd  = 0.02 cm^—1 and g  = 1.96.     

Two isomorphous crotonatolanthanide complexes: tetra‐μ‐but‐2‐enoato‐bis[diaqua(but‐2‐enoato)Ln]–2,6‐diaminopurine (1/2) (Ln = Dy and Ho)

The title isomorphous compounds, tetra‐μ‐but‐2‐enoato‐bis[diaqua(but‐2‐enoato)dysprosium(III)]–2,6‐diaminopurine (1/2), [Dy₂(C₄H₅O₂)₆(H₂O)₄]·2C₅H₆N₆, and tetra‐μ‐but‐2‐enoato‐bis[diaqua(but‐2‐enoato)holmium(III)]–2,6‐diaminopurine (1/2), [Ho₂(C₄H₅O₂)₆(H₂O)₄]·2C₅H₆N₆, consist of [Ln(crot)₃(H₂O)₂]₂ dimers (crot is crotonate or but‐2‐enoate; Ln is the lanthanide cation), built up around inversion centres and completed by 2,6‐diaminopurine molecules. The lanthanide cation is coordinated by three chelating crotonate units and two water molecules. One of the chelating carboxylate groups acts also in a bridging mode sharing one O atom with both cations and the final result is a pair of DyO₉ tricapped prismatic polyhedra linked to each other through a central (Dy—O)₂ loop. A feature of the structures is the existence of a complex intermolecular interaction scheme involving two sets of tightly interlinked non‐intersecting one‐dimensional structures, one of them formed by the [Dy(crot)₃(H₂O)₂]₂ dimers (running along [100] and linked by O—H...O hydrogen bonds) and the second formed by 2,6‐diaminopurine molecules (evolving along [010] linked by N—H...N hydrogen bonds).     

Synthese und Kristallstrukturen neuer komplexer Chloride der Lanthanide mit 3, 5‐Dimethylpyridiniumkationen: (3, 5‐Dimethylpyridinium)2[LnCl4(H2O)2]Cl (Ln = La,Pr) und (3, 5‐Dimethylpyridinium)3[TbCl6]

Preparation and Crystal Structures of New Complex Clorides of Lanthanides containing 3, 5‐Dimethylpyridinium Cations: (3, 5‐Dimethylpyridinium)₂[LnCl₄(H₂O)₂]Cl (Ln = La, Pr) and (3, 5‐Dimethylpyridinium)₃[TbCl₆] Crystals of the complex chlorides (3, 5‐dimethylpyridinium)₂[LaCl₄(H₂O)₂]Cl ( 1 ), (3, 5‐dimethylpyridinium)₂[PrCl₄(H₂O)₂]Cl ( 2 ) and (3, 5‐dimethylpyridinium)₃[TbCl₆] ( 3 ) have been prepared by reaction of LnCl₃ · x H₂O (Ln = La, Pr, Tb; x = 6‐7) with 3, 5‐dimethylpyridiniumchloride in ethanol/butanol solution. The crystal structures have been determined from single crystal X‐ray diffraction data. The compounds 1 and 2 are isotypic with each other and crystallize in the triclinic space group P1¯ (Z = 2). The 3, 5‐dimethylpyridinium cations are linked by hydrogen bonds to the anionic part of the structure built up by isolated chloride ions and strings of edge coupled triangulated dodecahedra [LnCl_4/2Cl₂(H₂O)₂]^—. The organic units are arranged forming a “π‐stacking”. 3 cristallizes monoclinically in the space group P2₁/c (Z = 4). The structure contains octahedral building units [TbCl₆]^3—. These octahedra are interconnected by the organic cations via hydrogen bonds forming chains parallel to [0 0 1].     

Complexation Properties of N,N′,N″,N′′′‐[1,4,7,10‐Tetraazacyclododecane‐1,4,7,10‐tetrayltetrakis(1‐oxoethane‐2,1‐diyl)]tetrakis[glycine] (H4dotagl). Equilibrium,Kinetic, and Relaxation Behavior of the Lanthanide(III) Complexes

Eu³⁺, Dy³⁺, and Yb³⁺ complexes of the dota‐derived tetramide N,N′,N″,N′′′‐[1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐1,4,7,10‐tetrayltetrakis(1‐oxoethane‐2,1‐diyl)]tetrakis[glycine] (H₄dotagl) are potential CEST contrast agents in MRI. In the [Ln(dotagl)] complexes, the Ln³⁺ ion is in the cage formed by the four ring N‐atoms and the amide O‐atom donor atoms, and a H₂O molecule occupies the ninth coordination site. The stability constants of the [Ln(dotagl)] complexes are ca. 10 orders of magnitude lower than those of the [Ln(dota)] analogues (H₄dota=1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐1,4,7,10‐tetraacetic acid). The free carboxylate groups in [Ln(dotagl)] are protonated in the pH range 1–5, resulting in mono‐, di‐, tri‐, and tetraprotonated species. Complexes with divalent metals (Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺, and Cu²⁺) are also of relatively low stability. At pH>8, Cu²⁺ forms a hydroxo complex; however, the amide H‐atom(s) does not dissociate due to the absence of anchor N‐atom(s), which is the result of the rigid structure of the ring. The relaxivities of [Gd(dotagl)] decrease from 10 to 25°, then increase between 30–50°. This unusual trend is interpreted with the low H₂O‐exchange rate. The [Ln(dotagl)] complexes form slowly, via the equilibrium formation of a monoprotonated intermediate, which deprotonates and rearranges to the product in a slow, OH^?‐catalyzed reaction. The formation rates are lower than those for the corresponding Ln(dota) complexes. The dissociation rate of [Eu(dotagl)] is directly proportional to [H⁺] (0.1–1.0M HClO₄); the proton‐assisted dissociation rate is lower for [Eu(H₄dotagl)] (k₁=8.1?10^?6 M ^?1 s^?1) than for [Eu(dota)] (k₁=1.4?10^?5 M ^?1 s^?1).     

Hydrated Rare Earth Structural Networks containing the Phenylene‐1, 2‐dioxydiacetate (PDDA) Ligand

Reaction of LnCl₃ with Na₂(PDDA) (PDDA = phenylene‐1, 2‐dioxydiacetate) in a 1 to 2 mol ratio in aqueous solution yielded [Ln₂(PDDA)₃(H₂O)₆] · 2H₂O, structurally characterized for Ln = Ce ( 1 ), Sm ( 2 ) (redetermination), Tb ( 3 ) and Y ( 4 ) in a monoclinic C2/c array, a second related structural form [orthorhombic, Pbcn] being obtained for Tb ( 5 ), Ho ( 6 ) and Er ( 7 ). The ‘domains of existence' of these two previously described forms are now extended to Ce–Dy, Y, and Eu–Er, respectively. Reaction under the same conditions for the heavier Yb³⁺ ion yielded [Yb₂(PDDA)₃(H₂O)₆]_(∞|∞) · 4H₂O ( 8 ), orthorhombic, Pbca. In the case of Ln = La the bimetallic species [NaLa(PDDA)₂(H₂O)₂]_(∞|∞) · 4H₂O ( 9 ) was obtained, while reaction of LnCl₃ with Na₂(PDDA) in a 1 to 3 mol ratio led to the isolation of the isotypic (monoclinic, P2₁/c) [NaLn(PDDA)₂(H₂O)₂]_(∞|∞) · 4H₂O) for Ln = Ce ( 10 ) and Sm ( 12 ). With the smaller Ln = Yb, the more definitively bimetallic [NaYb(PDDA)₂(H₂O)₂]_(∞|∞) · 3H₂O ( 13 ) (triclinic, P$\bar{1}$ )) was obtained, the trihydrate solvation ascribed differing from that recorded (dihydrate) in a cosynchronous report.     

2,2′‐Bipyrimidine as Efficient Sensitizer of the Solid‐State Luminescence of Lanthanide and Uranyl Ions from Visible to Near‐Infrared

Treatment of Ln(NO₃)₃?nH₂O with 1 or 2 equiv 2,2′‐bipyrimidine (BPM) in dry THF readily afforded the monometallic complexes [Ln(NO₃)₃(bpm)₂] (Ln=Eu, Gd, Dy, Tm) or [Ln(NO₃)₃(bpm)₂]?THF (Ln=Eu, Tb, Er, Yb) after recrystallization from MeOH or THF, respectively. Reactions with nitrate salts of the larger lanthanide ions (Ln=Ce, Nd, Sm) yielded one of two distinct monometallic complexes, depending on the recrystallization solvent: [Ln(NO₃)₃(bpm)₂]?THF (Ln=Nd, Sm) from THF, or [Ln(NO₃)₃(bpm)(MeOH)₂]?MeOH (Ln=Ce, Nd, Sm) from MeOH. Treatment of UO₂(NO₃)₂?6H₂O with 1 equiv BPM in THF afforded the monoadduct [UO₂(NO₃)₂(bpm)] after recrystallization from MeOH. The complexes were characterized by their crystal structure. Solid‐state luminescence measurements on these monometallic complexes showed that BPM is an efficient sensitizer of the luminescence of both the lanthanide and the uranyl ions emitting visible light, as well as of the Yb^III ion emitting in the near‐IR. For Tb, Dy, Eu, and Yb complexes, energy transfer was quite efficient, resulting in quantum yields of 80.0, 5.1, 70.0, and 0.8 %, respectively. All these complexes in the solid state were stable in air.