An integrated "4-phase" approach for setting endocrine disruption screening priorities--phase I and II predictions of estrogen receptor binding affinity

Recent legislation mandates the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop a screening and testing program for potential endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), of which xenoestrogens figure prominently. Under the legislation, a large number of chemicals will undergo various in vitro and in vivo assays for their potential estrogenicity, as well as other hormonal activities. There is a crucial need for priority setting before this strategy can be effectively implemented. Here we report an integrated computational approach to priority setting using estrogen receptor (ER) binding as an example. This approach rationally integrates different predictive computational models into a "Four-Phase" scheme so that it can effectively identify potential estrogenic EDCs based on their predicted ER relative binding affinity (RBA). The system has been validated using an in-house ER binding assay dataset for 232 chemicals that was designed to have both broad structural diversity and a wide range of binding affinities. When applied to 58,000 chemicals identified by Walker et al. as candidates for endocrine disruption screening, some 9100 chemicals were predicted to bind to ER. Of these, only 3600 were expected to bind to ER at RBA values up to 100,000-fold less than that of 17beta-estradiol. The method ruled out 83% of the chemicals as non-binders with a very low rate of false negatives. We believe that the same integrated scheme will be equally applicable to endpoints of other endocrine disrupting mechanisms, e.g. androgen receptor binding.     

An integrated "4-phase" approach for setting endocrine disruption screening priorities--phase I and II predictions of estrogen receptor binding affinity

Recent legislation mandates the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop a screening and testing program for potential endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), of which xenoestrogens figure prominently. Under the legislation, a large number of chemicals will undergo various in vitro and in vivo assays for their potential estrogenicity, as well as other hormonal activities. There is a crucial need for priority setting before this strategy can be effectively implemented. Here we report an integrated computational approach to priority setting using estrogen receptor (ER) binding as an example. This approach rationally integrates different predictive computational models into a "Four-Phase" scheme so that it can effectively identify potential estrogenic EDCs based on their predicted ER relative binding affinity (RBA). The system has been validated using an in-house ER binding assay dataset for 232 chemicals that was designed to have both broad structural diversity and a wide range of binding affinities. When applied to 58,000 chemicals identified by Walker et al. as candidates for endocrine disruption screening, some 9100 chemicals were predicted to bind to ER. Of these, only 3600 were expected to bind to ER at RBA values up to 100,000-fold less than that of 17 g -estradiol. The method ruled out 83% of the chemicals as non-binders with a very low rate of false negatives. We believe that the same integrated scheme will be equally applicable to endpoints of other endocrine disrupting mechanisms, e.g. androgen receptor binding.     

Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) model using a large diverse set of natural, synthetic and environmental chemicals for binding to the androgen receptor

A large number of natural, synthetic and environmental chemicals are capable of disrupting the endocrine systems of experimental animals, wildlife and humans. These so-called endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), some mimic the functions of the endogenous androgens, have become a concern to the public health. Androgens play an important role in many physiological processes, including the development and maintenance of male sexual characteristics. A common mechanism for androgen to produce both normal and adverse effects is binding to the androgen receptor (AR). In this study, we used Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA), a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) technique, to examine AR-ligand binding affinities. A CoMFA model with r2 = 0.902 and q2 = 0.571 was developed using a large training data set containing 146 structurally diverse natural, synthetic, and environmental chemicals with a 10(6)-fold range of relative binding affinity (RBA). By comparing the binding characteristics derived from the CoMFA contour map with these observed in a human AR crystal structure, we found that the steric and electrostatic properties encoded in this training data set are necessary and sufficient to describe the RBA of AR ligands. Finally, the CoMFA model was challenged with an external test data set; the predicted results were close to the actual values with average difference of 0.637 logRBA. This study demonstrates the utility of this CoMFA model for real-world use in predicting the AR binding affinities of structurally diverse chemicals over a wide RBA range.     

Holographic QSAR of environmental estrogens

Environmental endocrine disrupting chemicals(EDCs) or environmental estrogens pose severe healthhazard to wildlife and humans. They are believed to bethe main cause of the weakening activity and secretionof sex hormone, sperm declination, abnormal repro-d…     

Performance of (consensus) kNN QSAR for predicting estrogenic activity in a large diverse set of organic compounds

A novel method (in the context of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR)) based on the k nearest neighbour (kNN) principle, has recently been introduced for the derivation of predictive structure-activity relationships. Its performance has been tested for estimating the estrogen binding affinity of a diverse set of 142 organic molecules. Highly predictive models have been obtained. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that consensus-type kNN QSAR models, derived from the arithmetic mean of individual QSAR models were statistically robust and provided more accurate predictions than the great majority of the individual QSAR models. Finally, the consensus QSAR method was tested with 3D QSAR and log P data from a widely used steroid benchmark data set.     

Performance of (consensus) kNN QSAR for predicting estrogenic activity in a large diverse set of organic compounds

A novel method (in the context of quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR)) based on the k nearest neighbour (kNN) principle, has recently been introduced for the derivation of predictive structure–activity relationships. Its performance has been tested for estimating the estrogen binding affinity of a diverse set of 142 organic molecules. Highly predictive models have been obtained. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that consensus-type kNN QSAR models, derived from the arithmetic mean of individual QSAR models were statistically robust and provided more accurate predictions than the great majority of the individual QSAR models. Finally, the consensus QSAR method was tested with 3D QSAR and log?P data from a widely used steroid benchmark data set.     

A reactivity pattern for discrimination of ER agonism and antagonism based on 3-D molecular attributes

Various models have been developed to predict the relative binding affinity (RBA) of chemicals to estrogen receptors (ER). These models can be used to prioritize chemicals for further tiered biological testing to assess the potential for endocrine disruption. One shortcoming of models predicting RBA has been the inability to distinguish potential receptor antagonism from agonism, and hence in vivo response. It has been suggested that steroid receptor antagonists are less compact than agonists; thus, ER binding of antagonists may prohibit proper alignment of receptor protein helices preventing subsequent transactivation. The current study tests the theory of chemical bulk as a defining parameter of antagonism by employing a 3-D structural approach for development of reactivity patterns for ER antagonists and agonists. Using a dataset of 23 potent ER ligands (16 agonists, 7 antagonists), molecular parameters previously found to be associated with ER binding affinity, namely global ( E HOMO ) and local (donor delocalizabilities and charges) electron donating ability of electronegative sites and steric distances between those sites, were found insufficient to discriminate ER antagonists from agonists. However, parameters related to molecular bulk, including solvent accessible surface and negatively charged Van der Waal's surface, provided reactivity patterns that were 100% successful in discriminating antagonists from agonists in the limited data set tested. The model also shows potential to discriminate pure antagonists from partial agonist/antagonist structures. Using this exploratory model it is possible to predict additional chemicals for their ability to bind but inactivate the ER, providing a further tool for hypothesis testing to elucidate chemical structural characteristics associated with estrogenicity and anti-estrogenicity.