气相色谱质谱法测定化妆品中9种多环芳烃

建立了气相色谱质谱法测定化妆品中9种多环芳烃的分析方法。化妆品中的萘、苯并[a]蒽、、苯并[b]荧蒽、苯并[j]荧蒽、苯并[k]荧蒽、苯并[e]芘、苯并[a]芘、二苯并[a,h]蒽等9种多环芳烃用甲醇超声提取后,用环己烷液-液萃取后浓缩,经硅胶-中性氧化铝柱净化后,采用气相色谱-质谱测定。多环芳烃浓度在0.05～2 mg/L范围内,质量浓度与其峰面积呈良好的线性关系。在低、中、高3个添加水平下,9种多环芳烃化合物的平均回收率为81.6%～100.2%,相对标准偏差为1.3%～5.8%。方法可用于化妆品中多环芳烃的检测。     

气相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定卷烟滤嘴中15种多环芳烃

建立了气相色谱-串联质谱同时检测卷烟滤嘴中15种多环芳烃的方法。卷烟滤嘴用二氯甲烷振荡萃取后,经0.22μm有机相滤膜过滤,采用DB-5MS色谱柱(30 m×0.25 mm,0.25μm)进行分离,电子轰击源、正离子模式下以多反应监测模式进行检测,内标法进行定量。15种多环芳烃(苊烯、苊、芴、菲、蒽、荧蒽、芘、苯并[a]蒽、屈、苯并[b]荧蒽、苯并[k]荧蒽、苯并[a]芘、二苯并[a,h]蒽、苯并[g,h,i]苝和茚并[1,2,3-c,d]芘)的线性关系良好,相关系数(R~2)为0.991 4~0.999 9。15种多环芳烃在低、中、高3个添加水平下的平均回收率为81.6%~111.2%;除了芴在低添加水平时相对标准偏差为19.2%外,其他相对标准偏差均小于16%。15种多环芳烃的检出限为0.02~0.24 ng/滤嘴,定量限为0.04~0.80 ng/滤嘴。方法前处理简便,具有快速、准确、灵敏度高及重复性好的优点,适用于卷烟滤嘴中多环芳烃的分析。     

气相色谱质谱法测定聚氨酯塑胶跑道中多环芳烃

建立了气相色谱质谱法测定聚氨酯塑胶跑道中多环芳烃的分析方法。方法以甲苯为提取剂,经过超声提取和硅胶柱净化后,用气相色谱质谱测定16种多环芳烃含量。在0.5,1.0,5.0 mg/kg添加水平下平均回收率分别为73.8%~88.6%,84.0%~92.3%,88.2%~103.5%,相对标准偏差RSD分别为2.4%~9.2%,1.3%~8.2%,0.92%~7.3%。使用该方法测定实物样品发现6份塑胶跑道样品中均含有不同浓度的多环芳烃。     

皂化提取-高效液相色谱荧光法测定油炸食品中5种多环芳烃

建立了皂化提取-高效液相色谱荧光法测定油炸食品中苯并(a)芘、苯并(a)蒽、苯并(b)荧蒽、苯并(k)荧蒽及苯并[g,h,i]苝等5种多环芳烃的检测方法。油炸食品样品经皂化法处理,用正己烷提取,经浓缩处理后,用乙腈溶解,经高效液相色谱荧光定量检测。分离柱为Waters PAH C18柱(250 mm×4.6 mm i.d.,5μm);流动相为水-乙腈体系,梯度洗脱;流速1.0 mL/min,检测波长:苯并(a)蒽:λex=290 nm,λem=400 nm;其它4种目标物:λex=290 nm,λem=430 nm。不同基质样品中5种多环芳烃的定量限为0.1~0.6μg/kg。不同基质样品中5种多环芳烃的回收率为84.7%~106.3%,RSD为1.1%~3.2%(n=6),在相应浓度范围内呈良好的线性关系,线性相关系数均大于0.999。     

固相萃取-高效液相色谱法测定卷烟主流烟气中的多环芳烃

通过超声提取、固相萃取(SPE）纯化、反相高效液相色谱分离及荧光检测,建立了测定卷烟主流烟气中荧葸、苯并(k)荧蒽、苯并(a)芘、茚并[1,2、3-cd]芘和苯并[g,h,i]菲等5种多环芳烃的方法。方法的相对标准偏差为2．1％～4,1％,平均回收率为77．2％～90．1％。     

超高效合相色谱快速分析塑料制品中的18种多环芳烃

建立了一种超高效合相色谱-二极管阵列检测器快速分析塑料制品中萘、苊烯、苊、芴、菲、蒽、荧蒽、芘、苯并(a)蒽、(屈艹) 、苯并(b)荧蒽、苯并(k)荧蒽、苯并(j)荧蒽、苯并(e)芘、苯并(a)芘、茚并(1,2,3-cd)芘、二苯并(a,h)蒽、苯并(g,h,i)苝(二萘嵌苯)的方法。以甲苯为溶剂,超声萃取实际塑料制品中的多环芳烃,经超高效合相色谱分析。采用Daicel IB-3手性色谱柱,以CO₂为流动相,甲醇/乙腈(25:75, v/v)为流动相助溶剂,在柱温为40 ℃,背压为15.17 MPa的条件下,18种多环芳烃在8.5 min之内实现基线分离。18种多环芳烃的线性范围为0.05~50 mg/L(r≥0.9995),定量限(S/N> 10)为0.05 mg/L。加标回收率为78.3%~117.6%,相对标准偏差(RSD, n=5)小于5%。该方法具有分析速度快、分离效率高、节约有机溶剂的优点。     

高效液相色谱法测定煤沥青中16种多环芳烃

建立了煤沥青中苯并[a]蒽、苯并[a]芘等16种多环芳烃(PAHs)的高效液相色谱分离检测方法。以甲苯为溶剂对煤沥青进行萃取,萃取液处理后经柱层析分离,层析洗脱液分组回收,然后进行液相色谱分析。采用ZORBAX Eclipse PAH柱分离,以乙腈-水为流动相进行梯度洗脱,紫外检测器进行测定。结果表明,16种PAHs的线性范围为0.5~20 mg/L,相关系数(r)均大于0.999,检出限为0.0031~0.035μg/L,方法的回收率为97.2%~108.3%,相对标准偏差(RSD)为0.18%~3.5%。方法用于两种不同煤沥青中16种PAHs含量的测定,两种煤沥青中16种PAHs的含量分别为107.86 g/kg和103.71 g/kg,其中苯并[a]芘的含量分别为11.86 g/kg和13.82 g/kg。     

冷冻研磨超声浸提分离-气相色谱-质谱法测定充油丁苯橡胶中8种多环芳烃的含量

为从充油丁苯橡胶样品中分离提取其中所含8种多环芳烃化合物(PAHs,包括苯并[a]蒽、艹屈、苯并[b]荧蒽、苯并[j]荧蒽、苯并[k]荧蒽、苯并[e]芘、苯并[a]芘及二苯并[a,h]蒽),采用了冷冻研磨、超声浸提法。试验选择了5件样品分别将其粉碎至约2mm~3的颗粒,并取一定量的颗粒样品置于研磨仪中进行冷冻研磨至粉末状态。称取加工成粉末状的样品1.00g,加入正己烷-丙酮(1+1)混合溶液10mL,在40℃超声提取35min。将所得提取液氮吹浓缩至近干,用正己烷1mL溶解残渣,所得溶液经滤膜过滤,滤液供气相色谱-质谱分析。采用VB-17MS毛细管色谱柱,在90～300℃温度区间按程序升温模式进行分离。在质谱分析中,用电子轰击离子源和选择离子监测模式。测得8种PAHs的线性范围均在0.05～5.0mg·L~(-1)之间,检出限(3S/N)在0.01～0.02mg·L~(-1)之间。在样品溶液中加入混合标准溶液进行回收试验,测得回收率在84.5%～106%之间,并从测定值计算其相对标准偏差(n=6)在1.6%～4.9%之间。     

固相膜萃取-超高效液相色谱-荧光法测定极地水体中多环芳烃

采用C<,18>固相膜萃取对样品进行富集净化,以二氯甲烷洗脱目标化合物,采用UPLC荧光可变波长进行分离分析.可在5min内实现15种多环芳烃分析,方法检出限分别为:萘为0.3ng/L,苊、芴、菲和苯并(a)蒽为0.26ng/L,蒽、荧蒽、苯并(b)荧蒽和茚并(1,2,3-cd)芘为0.28ng/L;芘、屈、苯并(k)荧蒽、苯并(a)芘和二苯并(a,h)蒽为0.24ng/L;苯并(g,h,i)苝为2.6ng/L.加标回收率在67%～87%之间,RSD均小于10%.可应用于极地环境中痕量多环芳烃样品的检测分析.     

不同操作模式下多环茎烃气相色谱特性的研究

在气相色谱分析萘,联苯,苊,芴,蒽,荧蒽,芘,苯并蒽,苯并（ａ）芘的研究过程中,以有效塔板数作为考察指标对新型色谱操作模式－程序升温升压操作条件进行了优化。通过对Ｋｏｖａｔｓ保留指数体系和Ｌｅｅ保留指数体系在不同操作模式下的对比实验表明,在脉冲进样和程序升压等新型色谱操作条件下,Ｌｅｅ保留指数体系仍能够满足对多环芳烃定性分析的要求,前者则不能。     

加速溶剂萃取和凝胶渗透色谱净化GC–MS法测定烟熏腊肉中16种多环芳烃

采用ASE萃取、GPC净化和浓缩,建立GC–MS法快速检测烟熏腊肉中16种多环芳烃(PAHs)的分析方法。将烟熏腊肉与硅藻土充分混合后,放到萃取池中加速溶剂萃取,在优化仪器条件下测定,16种PAHs的线性范围为0.1~4 ng/m L,线性相关系数r为0.985 3~0.999 9。方法检出限在0.172~0.233μg/kg之间,加标回收率为60.3%~93.2%,测定结果的相对标准偏差为4.06%~11.60%(n=6)。该方法检测快速,准确度高,重现性好,适合于烟熏腊肉中16种PAHs的同时测定。     

加速溶剂萃取-固相萃取净化-气相色谱/质谱法测定土壤中的多环芳烃

建立了加速溶剂萃取-固相萃取净化-气相色谱/质谱法同时测定土壤中16种多环芳烃的方法。土壤样品经正己烷-丙酮提取,经无水Na₂SO₄脱水、氮吹浓缩后,弗罗里土小柱净化,采用气相色谱/质谱检测,内标法定量。结果表明:该方法在质量浓度0.4～10μg/mL范围内线性良好,相关系数(r²)大于0.9962,检出限为4.8～25μg/kg,定量限为19.2～100μg/kg;在0.05,0.15,0.40 mg/kg 3个加标水平下的平均回收率为55.4%～129.0%,相对标准偏差为1.5%～11%。采用该方法检测土壤样品,除苊烯、苊、芴3种多环芳烃未检出外,其他13种多环芳烃均有检出,其含量范围在6.6～86μg/kg。     

Triacontyl modified silica gel as a sorbent for the preconcentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous samples prior to gas chromatographic-mass spectrometry determination

<正>Triacontyl modified silica gel as a sorbent coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry(GC-MS) was developed to determine EPA prior 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs) in water samples.Various parameters of solid-phase extraction such as organic modifier solvent,eluent,sample flow rate and volume were optimized.The developed method was found to yield a linear calibration curve in the concentration range of 0.05-8μg/L with respect to naphthalene,acenaphthylene,acenaphthene and 0.01-8μg/L for dibenz[a,h]anthracene and 0.05-14μg/L for fluorene,phenanthrene,anthracene and 0.01-14μg/L for the rest of analytes.Furthermore,the good accuracy and repeatability of the method made sure the requirements for achieving reliable analysis of PAHs in the environmental water samples,and the recoveries of optimal method were in the range of 80-120%except to higher volatility PAHs.C_(30)-bonded silica was proved to be an efficient sorbent for extraction of high molecular weight PAHs.     

New procedure for selective extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in plants for gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis

A new solid-phase extraction method for the clean-up and the quantitation by GC-MS of regulated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from lettuce was developed and the experimental conditions were optimized. After ultrasonic extraction using toluene and saponification of samples, a clean-up of extracts through solid-phase extraction was performed. Samples were finally analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) using an internal deuterated standard. Saponification by KOH in methanol-water (80:20) was successful allowing a good elimination of the interfering chlorophylls from the extracts containing the PAHs. The average recovery of the 16 regulated PAHs was 70, 74, 79 and 89%, respectively, for naphthalene, acenaphthylene, acenaphthene and chrysene and higher than 94% for the others.     

气相色谱-串联质谱法测定土壤中多环芳烃和多氯联苯

研究土壤中持久性有机污染物的含量可以为区域环境治理和来源解析提供基础数据。本文通过固相萃取结合气相色谱-串联质谱法建立了16种多环芳烃和15种多氯联苯的检测方法,并优化了固相萃取净化方法、色谱条件以及质谱碰撞能量。结果表明16种多环芳烃和15种多氯联苯的标准曲线线性关系良好,方法线性相关系数r~20.999,方法的检出限为0.1~2.5μg·kg~(-1),16种多环芳烃的平均加标回收率范围为62.5%~113.5%,相对标准偏差在2.3%~8.2%之间,15种多氯联苯的平均加标回收率范围为62.6%~91.4%,相对标准偏差在5.2%~7.8%之间。方法的准确度和精密度较高,通过对实际样品的测定,说明该方法具有较低的检出限及较强的抗干扰能力,能满足土壤中多环芳烃和多氯联苯的检测要求。     

Dispersive solid-phase extraction clean up combined with Soxhlet extraction for the determination of 16 PAHs in soil samples by GC-MS

Dichloromethane soil samples extracts were prepared using Soxhlet extraction technique, and after clean-up step, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of 16 priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) was carried out. A comparison of dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) and column chromatography (cC), as clean-up techniques, was evaluated. Six different sorbents (silica, diatomaceous earth, primary–secondary amine, C18, clinoptilolite and florisil) were tested as dispersive clean-up sorbents versus activated silica and alumina for cC. Best results for three concentration levels among dSPE were obtained using diatomaceous earth, with recovery values in the range of 75–112% for 13 of 16 analysed compounds, while cC recoveries were in the range of 75–111% for all analysed PAHs. Analysis of 12 soil samples from urban area of Ni? (Serbia) singled out acenaphthene as the most abundant compound.     

Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediment using solid-phase microextraction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Manual solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is applied for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from natural matrix through a distilled water medium. Seven of the 16 PAH standards (naphthalene, acenaphthene, fluorene, anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene, benzo[a]anthracene) are spiked on a marine muddy sediment. The samples, containing PAHs in the range of 10-20 ppm, are then aged at room temperature more than 10 days before analysis. The influence of the matrix, SPME adsorption time, pH, salt content, and SPME adsorption temperature are investigated. The reproducibility of the technique is less than 13% (RDS) for the first 6 considered PAHs and 28% (RDS) for benzo(a)anthracene with a fiber containing a 100-micron poly dimethylsiloxane coating. Linearity extended in the range of 5-50 picograms for PAHs direct injection, 5-70 picograms for PAHs in water, and 1-170 picograms for PAHs in sediment. The detection limit is estimated less than 1 microgram/kg of dry sample for the first 6 considered PAHs in sediment and 1.5 micrograms/kg of dry sample for benzo(a)anthracene using the selected ion monitoring mode in GC-MS. The recoveries of the considered PAHs are evaluated.     

大体积搅拌棒吸附萃取技术与热脱附-气相色谱-质谱法测定地表水中多环芳烃

基于搅拌棒吸附萃取(SBSE)技术建立了气相色谱-质谱测定地表水中16种多环芳烃(PAHs)的分析方法。该法采用多搅拌吸附棒同时富集,依次热脱附冷聚焦后进样的方式有效解决了搅拌棒吸附时间长、富集水样体积小等问题。优化后的结果表明,在0.2~10 ng/L范围内(萘为0.5~10 ng/L范围),16种PAHs的线性关系良好,相关系数(r)均0.99,方法检出限(MDL)为0.03~0.20 ng/L(萘为0.50 ng/L)。用该方法对钱塘江流域地表水进行测定,共检测出11种PAHs,含量为0.13~1.57 ng/L,不同添加水平下的加标回收率为75.6%~108.9%。该法可应用于地表水样品中该类物质的超痕量检测。     

气相色谱-质谱法测定热塑性弹性体中的多环芳烃

建立了一种简单、准确的测定热塑性弹性体中16种多环芳烃(PAHs)的气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)方法。考察了样品制备、萃取溶剂、萃取方法、时间以及温度对厂家制备的阳性热塑性弹性体样品中PAHs提取效率的影响,确定了萃取条件和方法。样品经甲苯超声萃取、浓缩后用环己烷溶解、二甲亚砜液液萃取净化后采用GC-MS进行分析,内标法定量。通过对不同材质阳性热塑性弹性体样品的加标回收、精密度试验等对建立的方法进行评价,16种PAHs的平均回收率为70%～117%,精密度为0.2%～10.8%。该方法适合于热塑性弹性体中PAHs的测定。