Psychophysical evidence for auditory compression at low characteristic frequencies

Psychophysical estimates of compression often assume that the basilar-membrane response to frequencies well below characteristic frequency (CF) is linear. Two techniques for estimating compression are described here that do not depend on this assumption at low CFs. In experiment 1, growth of forward masking was measured for both on- and off-frequency pure-tone maskers for pure-tone signals at 250, 500, and 4000 Hz. The on- and off-frequency masking functions at 250 and 500 Hz were just as shallow as the on-frequency masking function at 4000 Hz. In experiment 2, the forward masker level required to mask a fixed low-level signal was measured as a function of the masker-signal interval. The slopes of these functions did not differ between signal frequencies of 250 and 4000 Hz for the on-frequency maskers. At 250 Hz, the slope for the 150-Hz masker was almost as steep as that for the on-frequency masker, whereas at 4000 Hz the slope for the 2400-Hz masker was much shallower than that for the on-frequency masker. The results suggest that there is substantial compression, of around 0.2-0.3 dB/dB, at low CFs in the human auditory system. Furthermore, the results suggest that at low CFs compression does not vary greatly with stimulation frequency relative to CF.     

Temporal integration in the presence of off-frequency maskers

Temporal integration was measured at a relatively low and a relatively high signal frequency under conditions of off-frequency masking. The masker was typically gated for 300 ms, and the signal was presented 70 ms after masker onset. In experiment 1, the signal frequency was 500 or 2000 Hz. Temporal integration was measured in quiet and in the presence of a masker whose frequency was lower or higher than the signal frequency. In all listening situations, there was less integration at 2000 Hz than at 500 Hz. This effect of frequency was particularly dramatic in the presence of a lower frequency masker, where there was almost no integration at 2000 Hz. Experiment 2 showed that this dramatic effect of frequency cannot be understood in terms of the underlying psychometric functions. Experiment 3 measured temporal integration at 750 and 2000 Hz for a large number of masker-signal frequency separations for both a tonal and a noise masker, and in conditions where the masker was gated or continuous. The results with the gated tonal masker largely confirmed the results of experiment 1. The results with the continuous tonal masker and the gated or continuous noise masker, however, were quite different. In those cases, the amount of temporal integration at both signal frequencies was more or less independent of the masker-signal separation; the masked temporal integration was nearly equal to the integration in quiet. Thus based on the conditions evaluated here, off-frequency masked temporal integration differs substantially from integration in quiet only for gated tonal maskers located considerably lower in frequency than the signal. It is unclear how to account for this finding, although it may be related to attentional factors.     

Temporal effects in simultaneous masking with on- and off-frequency noise maskers: effects of signal frequency and masker level

Temporal effects in simultaneous masking were measured as a function of masker level for an on-frequency broadband masker and an off-frequency narrow-band masker for signal frequencies of 750, 1730, and 4000 Hz. The on-frequency masker was 10 equivalent rectangular bandwidths (ERBs) wide and centered at the signal frequency; the off-frequency masker was 500 Hz wide and its lower frequency edge was 1.038 ERBs higher in frequency than the signal. The primary goal of the study was to determine whether previously observed differences regarding the effects of signal frequency and masker level on the temporal effect for these two different types of masker might be due to considerably different signal levels at threshold. Despite similar masked thresholds, the effects of signal frequency and masker level in the present study were different for the two masker types. The temporal effect was significant for the two highest frequencies and absent for the lowest frequency in the presence of the broadband masker, but was more or less independent of frequency for the narrow-band masker. The temporal effect increased but then decreased as a function of level for the broadband masker (at the two higher signal frequencies, where there was a temporal effect), but increased and reached an asymptote for the narrow-band masker. Despite the different effects of signal frequency and masker level, the temporal effects for both types of masker can be understood in terms of a basilar-membrane input-output function that becomes more linear during the course of masker stimulation.     

Physiological mechanisms of psychophysical masking: observations from auditory-nerve fibers

Masking might be due either to the spread of the excitation produced by the masker to the place of the tone signal along the cochlea or to the suppression of the response to the signal by the masker. In order to identify the contributions of these two mechanisms to tone-on-tone masking, masked thresholds of auditory-nerve fibers were measured in anesthetized cats using the same stimulus paradigms and detection criteria as in psychophysics. Suppressive masking was identified by comparing thresholds for simultaneous masking with those for a nonsimultaneous masking technique resembling pulsation thresholds. These nonsimultaneous thresholds do not include the contribution of suppression to masking because suppression only occurs for stimuli that overlap in time. For each masker and signal frequency, the fibers with the lowest (or "best") masked thresholds had characteristic frequencies (CF) slightly on the opposite side of the masker frequency with respect to the signal frequency, consistent with the psychophysical phenomenon of off-frequency listening. Patterns of best masked thresholds against signal frequency resembled psychophysical masking patterns in that they showed a maximum for signal frequencies close to the masker, and a skew toward high frequencies. Masking was found to be both excitatory and suppressive, with the relative contribution of the two mechanisms depending on the frequency separation between signal and masker. Suppressive masking was large for signal frequencies well above the masker. For these conditions, simultaneous thresholds grew more rapidly with masker level than did nonsimultaneous thresholds, suggesting that the upward spread of masking is largely due to the growth of suppression rather than to that of excitation.     

Modulation masking: effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase

Modulation thresholds were measured for a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) broadband noise in the presence of a SAM broadband background noise with a modulation depth (mm) of 0.00, 0.25, or 0.50, where the condition mm = 0.00 corresponds to standard (unmasked) modulation detection. The modulation frequency of the masker was 4, 16, or 64 Hz; the modulation frequency of the signal ranged from 2-512 Hz. The greatest amount of modulation masking (masked threshold minus unmasked threshold) typically occurred when the signal frequency was near the masker frequency. The modulation masking patterns (amount of modulation masking versus signal frequency) for the 4-Hz masker were low pass, whereas the patterns for the 16- and 64-Hz maskers were somewhat bandpass (although not strictly so). In general, the greater the modulation depth of the masker, the greater the amount of modulation masking (although this trend was reversed for the 4-Hz masker at high signal frequencies). These modulation-masking data suggest that there are channels in the auditory system which are tuned for the detection of modulation frequency, much like there are channels (critical bands or auditory filters) tuned for the detection of spectral frequency.     

Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration

These experiments examine how comodulation masking release (CMR) varies with masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration. In experiment 1, thresholds were measured for a 400-ms, 2000-Hz signal masked by continuous noise varying in bandwidth from 50-3200 Hz in 1-oct steps. In one condition, using random noise maskers, thresholds increased with increasing bandwidth up to 400 Hz and then remained approximately constant. In another set of conditions, the masker was multiplied (amplitude modulated) by a low-pass noise (bandwidth varied from 12.5-400 Hz in 1-oct steps). This produced correlated envelope fluctuations across frequency. Thresholds were generally lower than for random noise maskers with the same bandwidth. For maskers less than one critical band wide, the release from masking was largest (about 5 dB) for maskers with low rates of modulation (12.5-Hz-wide low-pass modulator). It is argued that this release from masking is not a "true" CMR but results from a within-channel cue. For broadband maskers (greater than 400 Hz), the release from masking increased with increasing masker bandwidth and decreasing modulator bandwidth, reaching an asymptote of 12 dB for a masker bandwidth of 800 Hz and a modulator bandwidth of 50 Hz. Most of this release from masking can be attributed to a CMR. In experiment 2, the modulator bandwidth was fixed at 12.5 Hz and the signal duration was varied. For masker bandwidths greater than 400 Hz, the CMR decreased from 12 to 5 dB as the signal duration was decreased from 400 to 25 ms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effect of basilar-membrane nonlinearity on the shapes of masking period patterns in normal and impaired hearing

Masking period patterns (MPPs) were measured in listeners with normal and impaired hearing using amplitude-modulated tonal maskers and short tonal probes. The frequency of the masker was either the same as the frequency of the probe (on-frequency masking) or was one octave below the frequency of the probe (off-frequency masking). In experiment 1, MPPs were measured for listeners with normal hearing using different masker levels. Carrier frequencies of 3 and 6 kHz were used for the masker. The probe had a frequency of 6 kHz. For all masker levels, the off-frequency MPPs exhibited deeper and longer valleys compared with the on-frequency MPPs. Hearing-impaired listeners were tested in experiment 2. For some hearing-impaired subjects, masker frequencies of 1.5 kHz and 3 kHz were paired with a probe frequency of 3 kHz. MPPs measured for listeners with hearing loss had similar shapes for on- and off-frequency maskers. It was hypothesized that the shapes of MPPs reflect nonlinear processing at the level of the basilar membrane in normal hearing and more linear processing in impaired hearing. A model assuming different cochlear gains for normal versus impaired hearing and similar parameters of the temporal integrator for both groups of listeners successfully predicted the MPPs.     

The role of envelope fluctuations in an apparent demonstration of suppression in simultaneous masking.

Fastl and Bechly [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74, 754-757 (1983)] reported that the threshold of a brief 900-Hz signal simultaneously masked by a band of noise. 100 Hz wide, centered at 1000 Hz, was reduced by approximately 8 dB by the addition of an 1150-Hz tone having a level of 20 dB above that of the narrow-band masker. They concluded that this decrease in threshold was a demonstration of suppression in simultaneous masking. Here it is argued that Fastl and Bechly's results simply reflect the poorer detectability of signals masked by higher-frequency fluctuating maskers (their narrow-band masker) than by relatively flat-envelope maskers (their composite narrow-band plus tonal masker). The results of three experiments support the masker-envelope explanation. In the first experiment, as in the report of Fastl and Bechly, the masker centered at 1000 Hz (M1) was a narrow-band noise and the masker centered at 1150 Hz (M2) was a tone. Fastl and Bechly's result was replicated. However, thresholds obtained when M1 was presented alone (the M1-only condition) were more affected by the starting level of the signal within each adaptive track than were thresholds obtained when M1 and M2 were presented together (the M1+M2 condition). This result paralleled a previous report that starting level influenced performance more with fluctuating than with flat-envelope maskers. For the four of seven subjects wh showed learning, there was also more improvement in the M1-only than in the M1 + M2 condition. In the second experiment, M1 was a tone and M2 was a narrow-band noise.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of signal frequency and masker level on the frequency regions responsible for the overshoot effect.

Two experiments investigated the relative influence of components close to and remote from the signal frequency (fs) on the overshoot effect. Overshoot was defined as the difference in threshold between a signal presented 4 ms after, and that for one presented 300 ms after, the onset of a 350-ms masker. Experiment 1 measured the overshoot effect using both wideband and narrow-band maskers (centered on fs), at two signal frequencies and three masker levels. Experiment 2 used a masker consisting of a "middle band" (MB, centered on fs) and two flanking bands (FBs, which, when combined with the MB, produced a flat wideband spectrum). The masker was continuous except for a 300-ms interval just prior to the signal, during which either all three bands, the MB alone, or the FBs alone were turned off. The results of both experiments showed that the overshoot effect was usually determined by off-frequency components. However, the on-frequency components played a substantial role when signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) at threshold were unusually high, such as at fs = 6500 Hz and intermediate masker levels. It is suggested that two different mechanisms contribute to the overshoot effect: an off-frequency mechanism which operates at all fs and masker levels, and an on-frequency mechanism which contributes to the overshoot effect only at high-threshold SNRs.     

Enhancements of the edges of temporal masking functions by complex patterns of overshoot and undershoot

The purpose of this report is to present new data that provide a novel perspective on temporal masking, different from that found in the classical auditory literature on this topic. Specifically, measurement conditions are presented that minimize rather than maximize temporal spread of masking for a gated (200-ms) narrow-band (405-Hz-wide) noise masker logarithmically centered at 2500 Hz. Masked detection thresholds were measured for brief sinusoids in a two-interval, forced-choice (21FC) task. Detection was measured at each of 43 temporal positions within the signal observation interval for the sinusoidal signal presented either preceding, during, or following the gating of the masker, which was centered temporally within each 500-ms observation interval. Results are presented for three listeners; first, for detection of a 1900-Hz signal across a range of masker component levels (0-70 dB SPL) and, second, for masked detection as a function of signal frequency (fs = 500-5000 Hz) for a fixed masker component level (40 dB SPL). For signals presented off-frequency from the masker, and at low-to-moderate masker levels, the resulting temporal masking functions are characterized by sharp temporal edges. The sharpness of the edges is accentuated by complex patterns of temporal overshoot and undershoot, corresponding with diminished and enhanced detection, respectively, at both masker onset and offset. This information about the onset and offset timing of the gated masker is faithfully represented in the temporal masking functions over the full decade range of signal frequencies (except for fs=2500 Hz presented at the center frequency of the masker). The precise representation of the timing information is remarkable considering that the temporal envelope characteristics of the gated masker are evident in the remote masking response at least two octaves below the frequencies of the masker at a cochlear place where little or no masker activity would be expected. This general enhancement of the temporal edges of the masking response is reminiscent of spectral edge enhancement by lateral suppression/inhibition.     

Effects of peripheral nonlinearity on psychometric functions for forward-masked tones

Psychometric functions (PFs) for forward-masked tones were obtained for conditions in which signal level was varied to estimate threshold at several masker levels (variable-signal condition), and in which masker level was varied to estimate threshold at several signal levels (variable-masker condition). The changes in PF slope across combinations of masker frequency, masker level, and signal delay were explored in three experiments. In experiment 1, a 2-kHz, 10-ms tone was masked by a 50, 70 or 90 dB SPL, 20-ms on-frequency forward masker, with signal delays of 2, 20, or 40 ms, in a variable-signal condition. PF slopes decreased in conditions where signal threshold was high. In experiments 2 and 3, the signal was a 4-kHz, 10-ms tone, and the masker was either a 4- or 2.4-kHz, 200-ms tone. In experiment 2, on-frequency maskers were presented at 30 to 90 dB SPL in 10-dB steps and off-frequency maskers were presented at 60 to 90 dB SPL in 10-dB steps, with signal delays of 0, 10, or 30 ms, in a variable-signal condition. PF slopes decreased as signal level increased, and this trend was similar for on- and off-frequency maskers. In experiment 3, variable-masker conditions with on- and off-frequency maskers and 0-ms signal delay were presented. In general, the results were consistent with the hypothesis that peripheral nonlinearity is reflected in the PF slopes. The data also indicate that masker level plays a role independent of signal level, an effect that could be accounted for by assuming greater internal noise at higher stimulus levels.     

Estimates of compression at low and high frequencies using masking additivity in normal and impaired ears

Auditory compression was estimated at 250 and 4000 Hz by using the additivity of forward masking technique, which measures the effects on signal threshold of combining two temporally nonoverlapping forward maskers. The increase in threshold in the combined-masker condition compared to the individual-masker conditions can be used to estimate compression. The signal was a 250 or 4000 Hz tone burst and the maskers (M1 and M2) were bands of noise. Signal thresholds were measured in the presence of M1 and M2 alone and combined for a range of masker levels. The results were used to derive response functions at each frequency. The procedure was conducted with normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. The results suggest that the response function in normal ears is similar at 250 and 4000 Hz with a mid level compression exponent of about 0.2. However, compression extends over a smaller range of levels at 250 Hz. The results confirm previous estimates of compression using temporal masking curves (TMCs) without assuming a linear off-frequency reference as in the TMC procedure. The impaired ears generally showed less compression. Importantly, some impaired ears showed a linear response at 250 Hz, providing a further indication that low-frequency compression originates in the cochlea.     

Forward- and simultaneous-masked thresholds in bandlimited maskers in subjects with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss

Forward- and simultaneous-masked thresholds were measured at 0.5 and 2.0 kHz in bandpass maskers as a function of masker bandwidth and in a broadband masker with the goal of estimating psychophysical suppression. Suppression was operationally defined in two ways: (1) as a change in forward-masked threshold as a function of masker bandwidth, and (2) as a change in effective masker level with increased masker bandwidth, taking into account the nonlinear growth of forward masking. Subjects were younger adults with normal hearing and older adults with cochlear hearing loss. Thresholds decreased as a function of masker bandwidth in forward masking, which was attributed to effects of suppression; thresholds remained constant or increased slightly with increasing masker bandwidth in simultaneous masking. For subjects with normal hearing, slightly larger estimates of suppression were obtained at 2.0 kHz rather than at 0.5 kHz. For hearing-impaired subjects, suppression was reduced in regions of hearing loss. The magnitude of suppression was strongly correlated with the absolute threshold at the signal frequency, but did not vary with thresholds at frequencies remote from the signal. The results suggest that measuring forward-masked thresholds in bandlimited and broadband maskers may be an efficient psychophysical method for estimating suppression.     

Auditory filter shape derived from binaural masking experiments

The shape of the auditory filter was calculated from binaural masking experiments. Two different types of maskers were used in the study, a masker that was interaurally in phase at all frequencies (No), and a masker with an interaural phase difference of 0 below 500 Hz and of pi above 500 Hz. The test-signal frequency varied between 200 and 800 Hz, and the test signal was presented either monaurally (Sm) or binaurally in antiphase (S pi). By comparing the masked thresholds from the two experimental conditions, the following conclusion can be drawn: The threshold of the test signal is only affected by the masker phase within a narrow frequency range around the test frequency. Thus, for test-signal frequencies well above or below 500 Hz, no influence of the phase transition on the BMLD is observed, and normal masked thresholds for No and N pi maskers are obtained. For test frequencies around 500 Hz, the step in interaural phase difference leads to a decrease in the interaural correlation of the masker within the critical band around the test-signal frequency. This results in strong threshold changes for both monaural and binaural signals. A calculation of the auditory filter shape from the masked threshold values was performed under the assumption that the masked threshold is only dependent on the interaural cross correlation of the masker within the filter band. Using the formula of the EC theory for the relation between masker correlation and BMLD, the experimental data are well described by a trapezoidal filter with an equivalent rectangular bandwidth of 80 to 84 Hz.     

Failure to obtain comodulation masking release with frequency-modulated maskers

These experiments were intended to determine whether comodulation masking release (CMR) occurs for maskers that are modulated in frequency rather than in amplitude. In experiment I, thresholds for a sinusoidal signal were measured in the presence of two continuous sinusoidal maskers: one was centered at the signal frequency (1.0 kHz), and the other was positioned at flanking frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 kHz. The two maskers were frequency modulated (FM) by the same low-pass-noise modulator (correlated condition) or by independent noise modulators (uncorrelated condition). Thresholds were the same for the correlated and uncorrelated maskers, i.e., no CMR occurred. This was also true when the flanking band was presented in the ear opposite to that containing the signal and the on-frequency masking band. In experiment II, 25-Hz-wide noise maskers were used. The on-frequency band was sinusoidally frequency modulated, while the off-frequency band either had the same FM or no FM. Thresholds were similar for the two conditions, again indicating that no CMR occurred. The results suggest that, unlike amplitude modulation, correlated FM of the masker in different frequency bands does not give rise to a release from masking.     

The effect of masker spectral asymmetry on overshoot in simultaneous masking

"Overshoot" is a simultaneous masking phenomenon: Thresholds for short high-frequency tone bursts presented shortly after the onset of a broadband masker are raised compared to thresholds in the presence of a continuous masker. Overshoot for 2-ms bursts of a 5000-Hz test tone is described for four subjects as a function of the spectral composition and level of the masker. First, it was verified that overshoot is largely independent of masker duration. Second, overshoot was determined for a variety of 10-ms masker bursts composed of differently filtered uniform masking noise with an overall level of 60 dB SPL: unfiltered, high-pass (cutoff at 3700 Hz), low-pass (cutoff at 5700 Hz), and third-octave-band-(centered at 5000 Hz) filtered uniform masking noises presented separately or combined with different bandpass maskers (5700-16000 Hz, 5700-9500 Hz, 8400-16000 Hz) were used. Third, masked thresholds were measured for maskers composed of an upper or lower octave band adjacent to the third-octave-band masker as a function of the level of the octave band. All maskers containing components above the critical band of the test tone led to overshoot; no additional overshoot was produced by masker components below it. Typical values of overshoot were on the order of 12 dB. Overshoot saturated when masker levels were above 60 dB SPL for the upper octave-band masker. The standard neurophysiological explanation of overshoot accounts only partially for these data. Details that must be accommodated by any full explanation of overshoot are discussed.     

Additivity of simultaneous masking

Simultaneous masking functions (signal level at threshold versus masker level) were obtained for equally intense maskers presented individually and in pairs. The signal was a 2.0-kHz sinusoid. The pairs of maskers were (1) two sinusoids with frequencies 1.9 and 2.1 kHz, (2) two narrow bands of noise (50 Hz wide) centered at 1.9 and 2.1 kHz, (3) two narrow bands of noise (50 Hz wide) centered at 1.8 and 1.9 kHz, and (4) the 1.9-kHz sinusoid combined with the narrow band of noise centered at 2.1 kHz. The pairs of maskers produced anywhere from 10 to 17 dB of masking beyond that predicted from the simple sum of the masking produced by the individual maskers. The amount of this "additional masking" was independent of masker level. Adding a continuous low level background noise reduced the amount of additional masking only slightly (approximately 5 dB). The data are consistent with a model in which the effects of the maskers are summed after undergoing independent compressive transformations.     

Simultaneous masking by gated and continuous sinusoidal maskers

Simultaneous masking of a 20-ms, 1-kHz signal was investigated using 50-ms gated and continuous sinusoidal maskers with frequencies below, at, and above 1 kHz. Gated maskers can produce considerably (5-20 dB) more masking than continuous maskers, and this difference does not appear to result from the spread of energy produced by gating either the masker or the signal. For masker frequencies below the signal frequency, this difference in masking is primarily due to the detection of the cubic difference tone in the continuous condition. For masker frequencies at and above the signal frequency, the difference appears to be an important property of masking. Implications of this frequency-dependent effect for measures of frequency selectivity are discussed.     

Additivity of forward masking

Masked thresholds for a 1000-Hz sinusoidal signal were measured as a function of masker level in both forward and simultaneous masking for two types of maskers: a 1000-Hz sinusoid and a narrowband noise, 60-Hz wide, centered at 1000 Hz. In forward masking, the noise masker produced much steeper growth-of-masking functions than the sinusoid. Presenting a contralateral broadband noise "cue" with the forward masker dramatically reduced the slope of masking for the noise masker but did not influence results for the sinusoidal masker. The noise remained the more effective masker. The amount of masking produced by combinations of equally effective narrowband-noise and sinusoidal maskers was compared to that produced by each masker individually with and without the contralateral cue. No additional masking beyond that predicted by energy summation was measured for forward masking. Additional masking beyond energy-sum predictions was measured for analogous conditions in simultaneous masking. Comparisons of results obtained with and without the contralateral cue suggest that signal thresholds in the presence of narrowband-noise forward maskers can reflect nonperipheral auditory processes.