Preparation of Stable Low‐Oxidation‐State Group 14 Element Amidohydrides and Hydride‐Mediated Ring‐Expansion Chemistry of N‐Heterocyclic Carbenes

Various low oxidation state (+2) group 14 element amidohydride adducts, IPr ? EH(BH₃)NHDipp (E=Si or Ge; IPr=[(HCNDipp)₂C:], Dipp=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃), were synthesized. Thermolysis of the reported adducts was investigated as a potential route to Si‐ and Ge‐based clusters; however, unexpected transmetallation chemistry occurred to yield the carbene–borane adduct, IPr ? BH₂NHDipp. When a solution of IPr ? BH₂NHDipp in toluene was heated to 100 °C, a rare C? N bond‐activation/ring‐expansion reaction involving the bound N‐heterocyclic carbene donor (IPr) transpired.     

N‐Heterocyclic Carbene Analogues of Thiele and Chichibabin Hydrocarbons

Stable N‐heterocyclic carbene analogues of Thiele and Chichibabin hydrocarbons, [(IPr)(C₆H₄)(IPr)] and [(IPr)(C₆H₄)₂(IPr)] ( 4 and 5 , respectively; IPr=C{N(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)}₂CHCH), are reported. In a nickel‐catalyzed double carbenylation of 1,4‐Br₂C₆H₄ and 4,4′‐Br₂(C₆H₄)₂ with IPr ( 1 ), [(IPr)(C₆H₄)(IPr)](Br)₂ ( 2 ) and [(IPr)(C₆H₄)₂(IPr)](Br)₂ ( 3 ) were generated, which respectively afforded 4 and 5 as crystalline solids upon reduction with KC₈. Experimental and computational studies support the semiquinoidal nature of 5 with a small singlet?triplet energy gap ΔE_S?T of 10.7 kcal mol^?1, whereas 4 features more quinoidal character with a rather large ΔE_S?T of 25.6 kcal mol^?1. In view of the low ΔE_S?T, 4 and 5 may be described as biradicaloids. Moreover, 5 has considerable (41 %) diradical character.     

“Spontaneous” Ambient Temperature Dehydrocoupling of Aromatic Amine–Boranes

The dehydrocoupling/dehydrogenation behavior of primary arylamine–borane adducts ArNH₂ ? BH₃ ( 3 a – c ; Ar= a : Ph, b : p‐MeOC₆H₄, c : p‐CF₃C₆H₄) has been studied in detail both in solution at ambient temperature as well as in the solid state at ambient or elevated temperatures. The presence of a metal catalyst was found to be unnecessary for the release of H₂. From reactions of 3 a , b in concentrated solutions in THF at 22 °C over 24 h cyclotriborazanes (ArNH‐BH₂)₃ ( 7 a , b ) were isolated as THF adducts, 7 a , b? THF, or solvent‐free 7 a , which could not be obtained via heating of 3 a – c in the melt. The μ‐(anilino)diborane [H₂B(μ‐PhNH)(μ‐H)BH₂] ( 4 a ) was observed in the reaction of 3 a with BH₃?THF and was characterized in situ. The reaction of 3 a with PhNH₂ ( 2 a ) was found to provide a new, convenient method for the preparation of dianilinoborane (PhNH)₂BH ( 5 a ), which has potential generality. This observation, together with further studies of reactions of 4 a , 5 a , and 7 a , b , provided insight into the mechanism of the catalyst‐free ambient temperature dehydrocoupling of 3 a – c in solution. For example, the reaction of 4 a with 5 a yields 6 a and 7 a . It was found that borazines (ArN‐BH)₃ ( 6 a – c ) are not simply formed via dehydrogenation of cyclotriborazanes 7 a – c in solution. The transformation of 7 a to 6 a is slowly induced by 5 a and proceeds via regeneration of 3 a . The adducts 3 a – c also underwent rapid dehydrocoupling in the solid state at elevated temperatures and even very slowly at ambient temperature. From aniline–borane derivative 3 c , the linear iminoborane oligomer (p‐CF₃C₆H₄)N[BH‐NH(p‐CF₃C₆H₄)]₂ ( 11 ) was obtained. The single‐crystal X‐ray structures of 3 a – c , 5 a , 7 a , 7 b? THF, and 11 are discussed.     

Stable ‐ESiMe3 Complexes of CuI and AgI (E=S,Se) with NHCs: Synthons in Ternary Nanocluster Assembly

As a part of efforts to prepare new “metallachalcogenolate” precursors and develop their chemistry for the formation of ternary mixed‐metal chalcogenide nanoclusters, two sets of thermally stable, N‐heterocyclic carbene metal–chalcogenolate complexes of the general formula [(IPr)Ag?ESiMe₃] (IPr=1,3‐bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)imidazolin‐2‐ylidene; E=S, 1 ; Se, 2 ) and [(iPr₂‐bimy)Cu?ESiMe₃]₂ (iPr₂‐bimy=1,3‐diisopropylbenzimidazolin‐2‐ylidene; E=S, 4 ; Se, 5 ) are reported. These are prepared from the reaction between the corresponding carbene metal acetate, [(IPr)AgOAc] and [(iPr‐bimy)CuOAc] respectively, and E(SiMe₃)₂ at low temperature. The reaction of [(IPr)Ag?ESiMe₃] 1 with mercury(II) acetate affords the heterometallic complex [{(IPr)AgS}₂Hg] 3 containing two (IPr)Ag?S^? fragments bonded to a central Hg^II, representing a mixed mercury–silver sulfide complex. The reaction of [(iPr₂‐bimy)Cu‐SSiMe₃]₂, which contains a smaller N‐heterocyclic‐carbene, with mercuric(II) acetate affords the high nuclearity cluster, [(iPr₂‐bimy)₆Cu₁₀S₈Hg₃] 6 . The new N‐heterocyclic carbene metal–chalcogenolate complexes 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 and the ternary mixed‐metal chalcogenolate complex 3 and cluster 6 have been characterized by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy (¹H and ¹³C), elemental analysis and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Metal‐Free Addition/Head‐to‐Tail Polymerization of Transient Phosphinoboranes,RPH‐BH2: A Route to Poly(alkylphosphinoboranes)

Mild thermolysis of Lewis base stabilized phosphinoborane monomers R¹R²P? BH₂?NMe₃ (R¹,R²=H, Ph, or tBu/H) at room temperature to 100 °C provides a convenient new route to oligo‐ and polyphosphinoboranes [R¹R²P‐BH₂]_n. The polymerization appears to proceed via the addition/head‐to‐tail polymerization of short‐lived free phosphinoborane monomers, R¹R²P‐BH₂. This method offers access to high molar mass materials, as exemplified by poly(tert‐butylphosphinoborane), that are currently inaccessible using other routes (e.g. catalytic dehydrocoupling).     

Palladium‐Catalyzed Direct C2‐Arylation of an N‐Heterocyclic Carbene: An Atom‐Economic Route to Mesoionic Carbene Ligands

Blocking the C2 position of an imidazole‐derived classical N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) with an aryl group is an essential strategy to establish a route to mesoionic carbenes (MICs), which coordinate to the metal via the C4 (or C5) carbon atom. An efficient catalytic route to MIC precursors by direct arylation of an NHC is reported. Treatment of 1,3‐bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)imidazol‐2‐ylidene (IPr) with an aryl iodide (RC₆H₄I) in the presence of 0.5 mol % of [Pd₂(dba)₃] (dba=dibenzylideneacetone) precatalyst affords the C2‐arylated imidazolium salts {IPr(C₆H₄R)}I (R=H, 4‐Me, 2‐Me, 4‐OMe, 4‐COOMe) in excellent (up to 92 %) yields. Treatment of {IPr(C₆H₅)}I with CuI and KN(SiMe₃)₂ exclusively affords the MIC–copper complex [(IPrPh)CuI].     

Four‐Membered Heterometallacyclic d0 and d1 Complexes of Group 4 Metallocenes with Amidato Ligands

A study of the coordination chemistry of different amidato ligands [(R)N?C(Ph)O] (R=Ph, 2,6‐diisopropylphenyl (Dipp)) at Group 4 metallocenes is presented. The heterometallacyclic complexes [Cp₂M(Cl){κ²‐N,O‐(R)N?C(Ph)O}] M=Zr, R=Dipp ( 1 a ), Ph ( 1 b ); M=Hf, R=Ph ( 2 )) were synthesized by reaction of [Cp₂MCl₂] with the corresponding deprotonated amides. Complex 1 a was also prepared by direct deprotonation of the amide with Schwartz reagent [Cp₂Zr(H)Cl]. Salt metathesis reaction of [Cp₂Zr(H)Cl] with deprotonated amide [(Dipp)N?C(Ph)O] gave the zirconocene hydrido complex [Cp₂M(H){κ²‐N,O‐(Dipp)N?C(Ph)O}] ( 3 ). Reaction of 1 a with Mg did not result in the desired Zr(III) complex but in formation of Mg complex [(py)₃Mg(Cl) {κ²‐N,O‐(Dipp)N?C(Ph)O}] ( 4 ; py=pyridine). The paramagnetic complexes [Cp′₂Ti{κ²‐N,O‐(R)N?C(Ph)O}] (Cp′=Cp, R=Ph ( 7 a ); Cp′=Cp, R=Dipp ( 7 b ); Cp′=Cp*, R=Ph ( 8 )) were prepared by the reaction of the known titanocene alkyne complexes [Cp₂′Ti(η²‐Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃)] (Cp′=Cp ( 5 ), Cp′=Cp* ( 6 )) with the corresponding amides. Complexes 1 a , 2 , 3 , 4 , 7 a , 7 b , and 8 were characterized by X‐ray crystallography. The structure and bonding of complexes 7 a and 8 were also characterized by EPR spectroscopy.     

Pyridine‐Enhanced Head‐to‐Tail Dimerization of Terminal Alkynes by a Rhodium–N‐Heterocyclic‐Carbene Catalyst

A general regioselective rhodium‐catalyzed head‐to‐tail dimerization of terminal alkynes is presented. The presence of a pyridine ligand (py) in a Rh–N‐heterocyclic‐carbene (NHC) catalytic system not only dramatically switches the chemoselectivity from alkyne cyclotrimerization to dimerization but also enhances the catalytic activity. Several intermediates have been detected in the catalytic process, including the π‐alkyne‐coordinated Rh^I species [RhCl(NHC)(η²‐HC?CCH₂Ph)(py)] ( 3 ) and [RhCl(NHC){η²‐C(tBu)?C(E)CH?CHtBu}(py)] ( 4 ) and the Rh^III–hydride–alkynyl species [RhClH{? C?CSi(Me)₃}(IPr)(py)₂] ( 5 ). Computational DFT studies reveal an operational mechanism consisting of sequential alkyne C? H oxidative addition, alkyne insertion, and reductive elimination. A 2,1‐hydrometalation of the alkyne is the more favorable pathway in accordance with a head‐to‐tail selectivity.     

Water Soluble Gold(I)‐diacetyl‐1,3,5‐triaza‐7‐phosphaadamantane‐arylazoimidazole Complexes: Synthesis and Spectroscopic Study

Reaction of [Au(DAPTA)(Cl)] with RaaiR’ in CH2Cl2 medium following ligand addition leads to [Au(DAPTA)(RaaiR’)](Cl) [DAPTA＝diacetyl-1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane, RaaiR’＝p-R-C6H4-N＝N- C3H2-NN-1-R’, (1—3), abbreviated as N,N’-chelator, where N(imidazole) and N(azo) represent N and N’, respectively; R＝H (a), Me (b), Cl (c) and R’＝Me (1), CH2CH3 (2), CH2Ph (3)]. The 1H NMR spectral measurements in D2O suggest methylene, CH2, in RaaiEt gives a complex AB type multiplet while in RaaiCH2Ph it shows AB type quartets. 13C NMR spectrum in D2O suggest the molecular skeleton. The 1H-1H COSY spectrum in D2O as well as contour peaks in the 1H-13C HMQC spectrum in D2O assign the solution structure.     

Hydroboration of Arynes with N‐Heterocyclic Carbene Boranes

Arynes were generated in situ from ortho‐silyl aryl triflates and fluoride ions in the presence of stable N‐heterocyclic carbene boranes (NHC? BH₃). Spontaneous hydroboration ensued to provide stable B‐aryl‐substituted NHC‐boranes (NHC? BH₂Ar). The reaction shows good scope in terms of both the NHC‐borane and aryne components and provides direct access to mono‐ and disubstituted NHC‐boranes. The formation of unusual ortho regioisomers in the hydroboration of arynes with an electron‐withdrawing group supports a hydroboration process with hydride‐transfer character.     

The Haloboration of Tri‐tert‐butylazadiboriridine NB2R3: Ring Opening versus NB3 Cluster Formation

The azadiboriridine [–BR–NR–BR–] ( 1 ; R = tBu) is bromoborated at the B–B bond by alkyldibromoboranes R′BBr₂ to give the products Br–BR–NR=BR–BR′–Br ( 8 a – g : R′ = Me, Bu, iBu, Bzl, CH₂CHEt₂, CH₂Cy, CH₂(4‐C₆H₄tBu)). Two isomers of each of the products 8 a – g are formed and attributed to a cis/trans isomerism at the BN double bond; the isomerization is followed thermodynamically and kinetically by NMR methods with 8 a – d . The analogous chloroboration of 1 with BCl₃ yields Cl–BR–NR=BR–BCl₂ ( 8 h ), which at ambient temperature undergoes a degenerate exchange of the ligands Cl and BCl₂ along the B–N–B skeleton. At room temperature, the isomer Cl–BR–NR=BCl–BR–Cl ( 8 h ′) is slowly formed by an irreversible exchange of R and Cl along the B–B bond of 8 h . Different from BCl₃, the chloroborane BH₂Cl is simply added to the B–B bond of 1 under formation of the aza‐nido‐tetraborane NB₃R₃H₂Cl ( 2 b ). The chloroborane BHCl₂ gives a mixture of 8 h ′ and 2 b upon addition to 1 , apparently according to a preceding dismutation into BCl₃ and BH₂Cl. The configuration at the B3 atom of the nido‐clusters NB₃R₃H₂X (X = H, Cl) is discussed on the basis of the corresponding model molecules NB₃Me₃H₂X, whose structure and NMR signals are computed by the B3LYP method. The boranes 8 b – g can be debrominated with Li in the presence of tmen on applying ultrasound. The products are found to be the B‐borylated azadiboriridines [–BR–NR–B(BRR′)–] ( 9 b – g ). The 2‐borylazadiboriridines NB₃H₄ ( 9 h ) and NB₃Me₄ ( 9 i ) were found as local minima on the energy hyperface by the B3LYP method, but minima for structural isomers with lower energy were also found; the tetrahedral clusters NB₃R₄ give high‐energy minima with triplet ground states. Computations of the ¹¹B NMR shifts of 9 h and 9 i support the proposed structures of 9 b – g .     

1‐Azonia‐2‐boratanaphthalenes

The 1‐azonia‐2‐boratanaphthalenes (NH)(BX)C₈H₆ can be synthesized from 2‐aminostyrene and the dihaloboranes XBHal₂ ( 1 ‐ 4 : X = Cl, Br, iPr, tBu). Further derivatives (NH)(BX)C₈H₆ are obtained from 1 by replacing Cl by alkoxy or alkyl groups [ 5 ‐ 8 : X = OMe, OtBu, Me, (CH₂)₃NMe₂]. The hydrolysis of 1 gives a mixture of the bis(azoniaboratanaphthyl) oxide [(NH)BC₈H₆]₂O ( 9 ) and the hydroxy derivative (NH)[B(OH)]C₈H₆ ( 10 ). The diboryl oxide 9 crystallizes in the space group C2/c. The lithiation of 4 at the nitrogen atom gives [NLi(tmen)](BtBu)C₈H₆ ( 11 ), which upon reaction with the diborane(4) B₂Cl₂(NMe₂)₂ yields the 1, 2‐bis(azoniaboratanaphthyl)diborane B₂[N(BtBu)C₈H₆]₂(NMe₂)₂ ( 12 ). The 2‐chloro‐1‐methyl‐4‐phenyl derivative (NMe)(BCl)C₈H₅Ph ( 13 ) of the parent (NH)(BH)C₈H₆ can be synthesized from the aminoborane BCl₂(NMePh) and phenylethyne. Substitution of Cl in 13 gives the derivatives (NMe)(BX)C₈H₅Ph [ 14 ‐ 20 : X = N(SiMe₃)₂, Me, Et, iBu, tBu, CH₂SiMe₃, Ph] and the reaction of 13 with Li₂O affords the bis(azoniaboratanaphthyl) oxide [(NMe)BC₈H₅Ph]₂O ( 21 ). The reaction of 16 or 19 with [(MeCN)₃Cr(CO)₃] yields the complexes [{(NMe)(BX)C₈H₅Ph}Cr(CO)₃] ( 22 , 23 : X = Et, CH₂SiMe₃), in which the chromium atom is hexahapto bound to the homoarene part of 16 or 19 , respectively. The complex 23 crystallizes in the space group P2₁/c. Upon reaction of the phenols para‐C₆H₄R(OH) with the aryldichloroboranes ArBCl₂ and subsequent condensation of the products with phenylethyne, the 1‐oxonia‐2‐boratanaphthalenes O(BAr)C₈H₄RPh with R in position 6 and Ph in position 4 are formed ( 24 ‐ 26 : Ar = Ph, R = H, Me, OMe; 27 ‐ 29 : Ar = C₆F₅, R = H, Me, OMe). The azoniaboratanaphthalenes 1 ‐ 23 were characterized by NMR methods.     

Chemistry of Guanidinate‐Stabilised Diboranes: Transition‐Metal‐Catalysed Dehydrocoupling and Hydride Abstraction

Herein, we analyse the catalytic boron–boron dehydrocoupling reaction that leads from the base‐stabilised diborane(6) [H₂B(hpp)]₂ (hpp=1,3,4,6,7,8‐hexahydro‐2H‐pyrimido[1,2‐a]pyrimidinate) to the base‐stabilised diborane(4) [H₂B(hpp)]₂. A number of potential transition‐metal precatalysts was studied, including transition‐metal complexes of the product diborane(4). The synthesis and structural characterisation of two further examples of such complexes is presented. The best results for the dehydrocoupling reactions were obtained with precatalysts of Group 9 metals in the oxidation state of +I. The active catalyst is formed in situ through a multistep process that involves reduction of the precatalyst by the substrate [H₂B(hpp)]₂, and mechanistic investigations indicate that both heterogeneous and (slower) homogeneous reaction pathways play a role in the dehydrocoupling reaction. In addition, hydride abstraction from [H₂B(hpp)]₂ and related diboranes is analysed and the possibility for subsequent deprotonation is discussed by probing the protic character of the cationic boron–hydrogen compounds with NMR spectroscopic analysis.     

Crystalline Radicals Derived from Classical N‐Heterocyclic Carbenes

One‐electron reduction of C2‐arylated 1,3‐imidazoli(ni)um salts (IPr^Ar)Br (Ar=Ph, 3 a ; 4‐DMP, 3 b ; 4‐DMP=4‐Me₂NC₆H₄) and (SIPr^Ar)I (Ar=Ph, 4 a ; 4‐Tol, 4 b ) derived from classical NHCs (IPr=:C{N(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)}₂CHCH, 1 ; SIPr=:C{N(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)}₂CH₂CH₂, 2 ) gave radicals [(IPr^Ar)]^. (Ar=Ph, 5 a ; 4‐DMP, 5 b ) and [(SIPr^Ar)]^. (Ar=Ph, 6 a ; 4‐Tol, 6 b ). Each of 5 a , b and 6 a , b exhibited a doublet EPR signal, a characteristic of monoradical species. The first solid‐state characterization of NHC‐derived carbon‐centered radicals 6 a , b by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction is reported. DFT calculations indicate that the unpaired electron is mainly located at the original carbene carbon atom and stabilized by partial delocalization over the adjacent aryl group.     

N‐Heterocyclic Carbene–Phosphinidene Complexes of the Coinage Metals

Coinage metal complexes of the N‐heterocyclic carbene–phosphinidene adduct IPr ? PPh (IPr=1,3‐bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)imidazolin‐2‐ylidene) were prepared by its reaction with CuCl, AgCl, and [(Me₂S)AuCl], which afforded the monometallic complexes [(IPr ? PPh)MCl] (M=Cu, Ag, Au). The reaction with two equivalents of the metal halides gave bimetallic [(IPr ? PPh)(MCl)₂] (M=Cu, Au); the corresponding disilver complex could not be isolated. [(IPr ? PPh)(CuOTf)₂] was prepared by reaction with copper(I) trifluoromethanesulfonate. Treatment of [(IPr ? PPh)(MCl)₂] (M=Cu, Au) with Na(BAr^F) or AgSbF₆ afforded the tetranuclear complexes [(IPr ? PPh)₂M₄Cl₂]X₂ (X=BAr^F or SbF₆), which contain unusual eight‐membered M₄Cl₂P₂ rings with short cuprophilic or aurophilic contacts along the chlorine‐bridged M???M axes. Complete chloride abstraction from [(IPr ? PPh)(AuCl)₂] was achieved with two equivalents of AgSbF₆ in the presence of tetrahydrothiophene (THT) to form [(IPr ? PPh){Au(THT)}₂][SbF₆]₂. The cationic tetra‐ and dinuclear complexes were used as catalysts for enyne cyclization and carbene transfer reactions.     

Ligand Effects on the Electronic Structure of Heteroleptic Antimony‐Centered Radicals

We report on the structures of three unprecedented heteroleptic Sb‐centered radicals [L(Cl)Ga](R)Sb^. ( 2‐R , R=B[N(Dip)CH]₂ 2‐B , 2,6‐Mes₂C₆H₃ 2‐C , N(SiMe₃)Dip 2‐N ) stabilized by one electropositive metal fragment [L(Cl)Ga] (L=HC[C(Me)N(Dip)]₂, Dip=2,6‐i‐Pr₂C₆H₃) and one bulky B‐ ( 2‐B ), C‐ ( 2‐C ), or N‐based ( 2‐N ) substituent. Compounds 2‐R are predominantly metal‐centered radicals. Their electronic properties are largely influenced by the electronic nature of the ligands R, and significant delocalization of unpaired‐spin density onto the ligands was observed in 2‐B and 2‐N . Cyclic voltammetry (CV) studies showed that 2‐B undergoes a quasi‐reversible one‐electron reduction, which was confirmed by the synthesis of [K([2.2.2]crypt)][L(Cl)GaSbB[N(Dip)CH]₂] ([K([2.2.2]crypt)][ 2‐B ]) containing the stibanyl anion [ 2‐B ]^?, which was shown to possess significant Sb?B multiple‐bonding character.     

η6‐Arene‐Zirconium‐PNP‐Pincer Complexes: Mechanism of Their Hydrogenolytic Formation and Their Reactivity as Zirconium(II) Synthons

The cyclometalated monobenzyl complexes [(Cbzdiphos^R‐CH)ZrBnX] 1 ^{i Pr} Cl and 1 ^Ph I reacted with dihydrogen (10 bar) to yield the η⁶‐toluene complexes [(Cbzdiphos^R)Zr(η⁶‐tol)X] 2 ^{i Pr} Cl and 2 ^Ph I (cbzdiphos=1,8‐bis(phosphino)‐3,6‐di‐tert‐butyl‐9H‐carbazole). The arene complexes were also found to be directly accessible from the triiodide [(Cbzdiphos^Ph)ZrI₃] through an in situ reaction with a dibenzylmagnesium reagent and subsequent hydrogenolysis, as exemplified for the η⁶‐mesitylene complex [(Cbzdiphos^Ph)Zr(η⁶‐mes)I] ( 3 ^Ph I ). The tolyl‐ring in 2 ^{i Pr} Cl adopts a puckered arrangement (fold angle 23.3°) indicating significant arene‐1,4‐diido character. Deuterium labeling experiments were consistent with an intramolecular reaction sequence after the initial hydrogenolysis of a Zr?C bond by a σ‐bond metathesis. A DFT study of the reaction sequence indicates that hydrogenolysis by σ‐bond metathesis first occurs at the cyclometalated ancillary ligand giving a hydrido‐benzyl intermediate, which subsequently reductively eliminates toluene that then coordinates to the Zr atom as the reduced arene ligand. Complex 2 ^Ph I was reacted with 2,6‐diisopropylphenyl isocyanide giving the deep blue, diamagnetic Zr^II‐diisocyanide complex [(Cbzdiphos^Ph)Zr(CNDipp)₂I] ( 4 ^Ph I ). DFT modeling of 4 ^Ph I demonstrated that the HOMO of the complex is primarily located as a “lone pair on zirconium”, with some degree of back‐bonding into the C≡N π* bond, and the complex is thus most appropriately described as a zirconium(II) species. Reaction of 2 ^Ph I with trimethylsilylazide (N₃TMS) and 2 ^{i Pr} Cl with 1‐azidoadamantane (N₃Ad) resulted in the formation of the imido complexes [(Cbzdiphos^R)Zr=NR′(X)] 5 ^{i Pr} Cl‐NAd and 5 ^Ph I‐NTMS , respectively. Reaction of 2 ^{i Pr} Cl with azobenzene led to N?N bond scission giving 6 ^{i Pr} Cl , in which one of the NPh‐fragments is coupled with the carbazole nitrogen to form a central η²‐bonded hydrazide(?1), whereas the other NPh‐fragment binds to zirconium acting as an imido‐ligand. Finally, addition of pyridine to 2 ^{i Pr} Cl yielded the dark purple complex [(Cbzdiphos^iPr)Zr(bpy)Cl] ( 7 ^{i Pr} Cl ) through a combination of CH‐activation and C?C‐coupling. The structural data and UV/Vis spectroscopic properties of 7 ^{i Pr} Cl indicate that the bpy (bipyridine) may be regarded as a (dianionic) diamido‐type ligand.     

trans‐Di­chloro­tetrakis(4‐methylpyrimidine‐N1)­ruthenium(II)

The title compound, trans‐[Ru^IICl₂(N¹‐mepym)₄] (mepym is 4‐methylpyrimidine, C₅H₆N₂), obtained from the reaction of trans,cis,cis‐[Ru^IICl₂(N¹‐mepym)₂(SbPh₃)₂] (Ph is phenyl) with excess mepym in ethanol, has fourfold crystallographic symmetry and has the four pyrimidine bases coordinated through N¹ and arranged in a propeller‐like orientation. The Ru—N and Ru—Cl bond distances are 2.082 (2) and 2.400 (4) Å, respectively. The methyl group, and the N³ and Cl atoms are involved in intermolecular C—H?N and C—­H?Cl hydrogen‐bond interactions.     

Difunctionalized {closo‐1‐CB11} Clusters: 1‐ and 2‐Amino‐12‐ethynylcarba‐closo‐dodecaborates

Carba‐closo‐dodecaborate anions with two functional groups have been synthesized via a simple two‐step procedure starting from monoamino‐functionalized {closo‐1‐CB₁₁} clusters. Iodination at the antipodal boron atom provided access to [1‐H₂N‐12‐I‐closo‐1‐CB₁₁H₁₀]^? ( 1 a ) and [2‐H₂N‐12‐I‐closo‐1‐CB₁₁H₁₀]^? ( 2 a ), which have been transformed into the anions [1‐H₂N‐12‐RC?C‐closo‐1‐CB₁₁H₁₀]^? (R=H ( 1 b ), Ph ( 1 c ), Et₃Si ( 1 d )) and [2‐H₂N‐12‐RC?C‐closo‐1‐CB₁₁H₁₀]^? (R=H ( 2 b ), Ph ( 2 c ), Et₃Si ( 2 d )) by microwave‐assisted Kumada‐type cross‐coupling reactions. The syntheses of the inner salts 1‐Me₃N‐12‐RC?C‐closo‐1‐CB₁₁H₁₀ (R=H ( 1 e ), Et₃Si ( 1 f )) and 2‐Me₃N‐12‐RC?C‐closo‐1‐CB₁₁H₁₀ (R=H ( 2 e ), Et₃Si ( 2 f )) are the first examples for a further derivatization of the new anions. All {closo‐1‐CB₁₁} clusters have been characterized by multinuclear NMR and vibrational spectroscopy as well as by mass spectrometry. The crystal structures of Cs 1 a , [Et₄N] 2 a , K 1 b , [Et₄N] 1 c , [Et₄N] 2 c , 1 e , and [Et₄N][1‐H₂N‐2‐F‐12‐I‐closo‐1‐CB₁₁H₉]?0.5 H₂O ([Et₄N ]4 a ?0.5 H₂O) have been determined. Experimental spectroscopic data and especially spectroscopic data and bond properties derived from DFT calculations provide some information on the importance of inductive and resonance‐type effects for the transfer of electronic effects through the {closo‐1‐CB₁₁} cage.     

Investigation of N‐Heterocyclic Carbene‐Supported Group 12 Triflates as Pre‐catalysts for Hydrosilylation/Borylation

N‐Heterocyclic carbene (NHC) complexes of Cd and Hg triflates (OTf) were prepared and their attempted conversion into rare cadmium and mercury hydrides was explored. In contrast to zinc, which forms stable [ZnH]⁺ complexes with NHCs, the heavier Cd and Hg congeners could not be formed; the increased instability of Cd‐H and Hg‐H units was rationalized with the aid of computations. It was also discovered that the dimeric adduct [IPr?Cd(μ‐OTf)₂]₂ (IPr=[(HCNDipp)₂C:]; Dipp=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃) is an active precatalyst for the hydrosilylation and hydroborylation of hindered aldehydes and ketones. The related zinc congener was inactive as a catalyst highlighting a distinct advantage of using heavy Group 12 metals to promote catalytic hydrosilylation/borylation.