Synthesis and structures of ruthenium di‐ and tricarbonyl complexes derived from 4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐one

Carbon monoxide (CO) has recently been shown to impart beneficial effects in mammalian physiology and considerable research attention is now being directed toward metal–carbonyl complexes as a means of delivering CO to biological targets. Two ruthenium carbonyl complexes, namely trans‐dicarbonyldichlorido(4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐one‐κ²N,N′)ruthenium(II), [RuCl₂(C₁₁H₆N₂O)(CO)₂], (1), and fac‐tricarbonyldichlorido(4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐one‐κN)ruthenium(II), [RuCl₂(C₁₁H₆N₂O)(CO)₃], (2), have been isolated and structurally characterized. In the case of complex (1), the trans‐directing effect of the CO ligands allows bidentate coordination of the 4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐one (dafo) ligand despite a larger bite distance between the N‐donor atoms. In complex (2), the cis disposition of two chloride ligands restricts the ability of the dafo molecule to bind ruthenium in a bidentate fashion. Both complexes exhibit well defined ¹H NMR spectra confirming the diamagnetic ground state of Ru^II and display a strong absorption band around 300 nm in the UV.     

Multiple Bonding Between Group 3 Metals and Fe(CO)3−

Heteronuclear Group 3 metal/iron carbonyl anion complexes ScFe(CO)₃^?, YFe(CO)₃^?, and LaFe(CO)₃^? are prepared in the gas phase and studied by mass‐selective infrared (IR) photodissociation spectroscopy as well as quantum‐chemical calculations. All three anion complexes are characterized to have a metal–metal‐bonded C_3v equilibrium geometry with all three carbonyl ligands bonded to the iron center and a closed‐shell singlet electronic ground state. Bonding analyses reveal that there are multiple bonding interactions between the bare group‐3 elements and the Fe(CO)₃^? fragment. Besides one covalent electron‐sharing metal–metal σ bond and two dative π bonds from Fe to the Group 3 metal, there is additional multicenter covalent bonding with the Group 3 atom bonded to Fe and the carbon atoms.     

Regioselective CC bond formation between ethylene and α-naphthylcarbaldimines catalyzed by Ru3(Co)12: NMR spectroscopic investigations on the proceeding of the reaction

The reaction of ethylene with imines derived from α-naphthylcarbaldehyde catalyzed by Ru₃(CO)₁₂ leads to the selective and quantitative formation of products in which one molecule of ethylene has been inserted into the CH bond in ortho position with respect to the exocyclic imine substituent. The stoichiometric reaction of the same ligands with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ leads to dinuclear ruthenium carbonyl complexes showing the same regioselectivity of CH activation but the hydrogen atom is shifted in an intramolecular hydrogen transfer reaction towards the former imine carbon atom. If the catalytic alkylation of α-naphthylcarbaldimines is monitored by NMR the occurrence of the dinuclear product of the stoichiometric reaction is observed before the reaction again quantitatively yields the imines bearing an ethyl group in 2-position of the naphthalene core. This proofs that there must be an equilibrium between the dinuclear ruthenium carbonyl complex which is also observed if α-naphthylcarbaldimines are treated with an equimolar amount of Ru₃(CO)₁₂ and another ruthenium compound where the ethylene might be inserted catalytically into a ruthenium carbon bond.     

Multiple Bonding Between Group 3 Metals and Fe(CO)3−

Heteronuclear Group 3 metal/iron carbonyl anion complexes ScFe(CO)₃⁻, YFe(CO)₃⁻, and LaFe(CO)₃⁻ are prepared in the gas phase and studied by mass-selective infrared (IR) photodissociation spectroscopy as well as quantum-chemical calculations. All three anion complexes are characterized to have a metal–metal-bonded C_3v equilibrium geometry with all three carbonyl ligands bonded to the iron center and a closed-shell singlet electronic ground state. Bonding analyses reveal that there are multiple bonding interactions between the bare group-3 elements and the Fe(CO)₃⁻ fragment. Besides one covalent electron-sharing metal–metal σ bond and two dative π bonds from Fe to the Group 3 metal, there is additional multicenter covalent bonding with the Group 3 atom bonded to Fe and the carbon atoms.     

Reactions of [Ru(CO)3Cl2]2 with aromatic nitrogen donor ligands in alcoholic media

The reactions of mono‐ and bidentate aromatic nitrogen‐containing ligands with [Ru(CO)₃Cl₂]₂ in alcohols have been studied. In alcoholic media the nitrogen ligands act as bases promoting acidic behaviour of alcohols and the formation of alkoxy carbonyls [Ru(N–N)(CO)₂Cl(COOR)] and [Ru(N)₂(CO)₂Cl(COOR)]. Other products are monomers of type [Ru(N)(CO)₃Cl₂], bridged complexes such as [Ru(CO)₃Cl₂]₂(N), and ion pairs of the type [Ru(CO)₃Cl₃]^? [Ru(N–N)(CO)₃Cl]⁺ (N–N = chelating aromatic nitrogen ligand, N = non‐chelating or bridging ligand). The reaction and the product distribution can be controlled by adjusting the reaction stoichiometry. The reactivity of the new ruthenium complexes was tested in 1‐hexene hydroformylation. The activity can be associated with the degree of stability of the complexes and the ruthenium–ligand interaction. Chelating or bridging nitrogen ligands suppresses the activity strongly compared with the bare ruthenium carbonyl chloride, while the decrease in activity is less pronounced with monodentate ligands. A plausible catalytic cycle is proposed and discussed in terms of ligand–ruthenium interactions. The reactivity of the ligands as well as the catalytic cycle was studied in detail using the computational DFT methods. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Lewis Acid Binding and Transfer as a Versatile Experimental Gauge of the Lewis Basicity of Fe0, Ru0, and Pt0 Complexes

A number of zerovalent ruthenium tri‐ and tetracarbonyl complexes of the form [Ru(CO)_5?nL_n] (n=1, 2) with neutral phosphine or N‐heterocyclic carbene donor ligands have been treated with the Lewis acids GaCl₃ and Ag⁺ to form a range of metal‐only Lewis pairs (MOLPs). The spectroscopic and structural parameters of the adducts are compared to each other and to related iron carbonyl based MOLPs. The Lewis basicity of the original Ru⁰ complexes is gauged by transfer experiments, as well as through the degree of pyramidization of the bound GaCl₃ units and the Ru?M bond lengths. The work shows the benefits of the MOLP concept as one of the few direct experimental gauges of metal basicity, and one that can allow comparisons between metal complexes with different metal centers and ligand sets.     

Novel diazadienes based on 1,3,4-oxadiazines: Ligands in iron carbonyl complexes and substrates in catalytic [2+2+1] cycloaddition reactions

N,N′-(4-methyl-4H-1,3,4-oxadiazine-5,6-diylidene)-bis-aniline derivatives react with Fe₂(CO)₉ to give dinuclear iron carbonyl complexes. One of the iron atoms is bonded symmetrically to both exocyclic imine nitrogen atoms. The second iron atom shows a side-on coordination towards the CN bond next to the oxadiazine oxygen atom. In addition, the iron atoms are connected via a metal metal bond. The same oxadiazine derivatives produce chiral spiro-lactams in a ruthenium catalyzed formal [2+2+1] cycloaddition reaction with carbon monoxide and ethylene.     

Coordination chemistry of neutral quinolyl- and aminophenylcyclopentadiene derivatives

The cyclopentadiene and indene derivatives 1–4 being functionalised by a dimethylaniline and quinolyl group, respectively, were treated with metal carbonyl complexes. Whereas cyclopentadienes (C₅R₅H) normally loose one hydrogen atom prior or during metal complex formation, leading to negatively charged cyclopentadienide ligands, the compounds 1–4 are able to act as neutral ligands without hydrogen loss. Consequently transition metal complexes with coordination of the nitrogen donor and a CC double bond of the five membered ring have been obtained. In some cases a hydrogen atom is eliminated and the expected η⁵-(C₅R₅) complexes are formed. Reaction of Ru₃(CO)₁₂ with 2 leads to the binuclear η⁶-fulvene complex 8. The octahedral molybdenum complex 9 and the square planar rhodium(I) complexes 10 and 11 which were obtained from Mo(CO)₆ and [Rh(CO)₂Cl]₂, respectively, are rare examples of η²-(C₅R₅H) coordination to metal atoms.     

Synthesis of allyl-transition metal complexes by phase transfer catalyzed reactions of metal carbonyl halides: III. Considerations of the mechanisms

Mechanisms are proposed for the hydroxide ion-initiated reactions of metal carbonyl halides which lead to allyl-transition metal complexes under phase transfer conditions. Evidence is presented for intermediate anionic metallocarboxylic acids in reactions leading to η³-allyl products of molybdenum, iron, ruthenium and manganese, whereas η¹ complexes are shown to result from halide displacement reactions in which simple metal carbonyl anions are generated. In some cases phosphorus-containing ligands inhibit the hydroxide-promoted reactions of metal carbonyl halides with allyl bromide; a rationale involving decreased acidity of the carbonyl ligands is presented. Syntheses of η³-C₃H₅Mn(CO)₃P(OCH₃)₃ and η³-C₃H₅Mn(CO)₂[P(OCH₃)₃]₂ by phase transfer catalysis are also described.     

Synthesis, Crystal Structure of Ruthenium 1,2－Naphthoquinone－1－oxime Complex and Its Mediated C－－C Coupling Reactions of Ter－minal Alkynes

Substituted decarbonylation reaction of ruthenium 1,2‐naphthoquinone‐1‐oxime (1‐nqo) complex, cis‐, cis‐[Ru| ζ²‐N(O)C₁₀‐H₆O|₂(CO)₂] (1), with acetonitrile gave cis‐, cis‐[Ru | ζ²‐ N(O)C₁₀H₆O|₂(CO)(NCMe)] (2). Complex 2 was fully characterized by ¹H NMR, FAB MS, IR spectra and single crystal X‐ray analysis. Complex 2 maintains the coordination structure of 1 with the two naphthoquinonic oxygen atoms, as well as the two oximato nitrogen atoms located cis to each other, showing that there is no ligand rearrangement of the 1‐nqo ligands during the substitution reaction. The carbonyl group originally trans to the naphthoquinonic oxygen in one 1‐nqo ligand is left in its original position [O(5)‐Ru‐C(1), 174.0(6)°], while the other one originally trans to the oximato group of the other 1‐nqo ligand is substituted by NCMe [N(1)‐Ru‐N(3), 170.6(6)°]. This shows that the carbonyl trans to oximato group is more labile than the one trans to naphthoquinonic O atom towards substitution. This is probably due to the comparatively stronger ± back bonding from ruthenium metal to the carbonyl group trans to naphthoquinonic O atom, than the one trans to oximato group, resulting in the comparatively weaker Ru–‐CO bond for the latter and consequently easier replacement of this carbonyl. Selected coupling of phenylacetylene mediated by 2 gave a single trans‐dimerization product 3, while 2 mediated coupling reaction of methyl propiolate produced three products: one trans‐dimerization product 4 and two cyclotrimeric products 5 and 6.     

Bonding Analysis of N‐Heterocyclic Carbene Tautomers and Phosphine Ligands in Transition‐Metal Complexes: A Theoretical Study

DFT calculations at the BP86/TZ2P level were carried out to analyze quantitatively the metal–ligand bonding in transition‐metal complexes that contain imidazole (IMID), imidazol‐2‐ylidene (nNHC), or imidazol‐4‐ylidene (aNHC). The calculated complexes are [Cl₄TM(L)] (TM=Ti, Zr, Hf), [(CO)₅TM(L)] (TM=Cr, Mo, W), [(CO)₄TM(L)] (TM=Fe, Ru, Os), and [ClTM(L)] (TM=Cu, Ag, Au). The relative energies of the free ligands increase in the order IMID<nNHC<aNHC. The energy levels of the carbon σ lone‐pair orbitals suggest the trend aNHC>nNHC>IMID for the donor strength, which is in agreement with the progression of the metal–ligand bond‐dissociation energy (BDE) for the three ligands for all metals of Groups 4, 6, 8, and 10. The electrostatic attraction can also be decisive in determining trends in ligand–metal bond strength. The comparison of the results of energy decomposition analysis for the Group 6 complexes [(CO)₅TM(L)] (L=nNHC, aNHC, IMID) with phosphine complexes (L=PMe₃ and PCl₃) shows that the phosphine ligands are weaker σ donors and better π acceptors than the NHC tautomers nNHC, aNHC, and IMID.     

Electron-impact studies of organometallic molecules—X. Some simple transition metal fluorocarbon complexes

The mass spectra of several fluoroalkyl, fluoroalkenyl and fluoroacyl complexes of manganese, rhenium, iron and ruthenium carbonyls are described. After loss of carbonyl groups, fluoroalkyl compounds eliminate an olefin, with formation of metal halide species. A trifluorovinyl complex shows a novel elimination of a carbon atom to give an ion postulated to be a difluorocarbene-metal fluoride; the occurrence of difluorocarbene-metal ions in the spectra of some related complexes is also discussed. The spectra of the acyl complexes show little evidence of elimination of the acyl carbonyl group; the major process is fission of the CO? R_f bond with loss of a fluoroalkyl radical and formation of the cationic metal carbonyl, e.g. π-C₅H₅M(CO)₃⁺ (M ? Fe or Ru). The relevance of thermal or photochemical model reactions to processes occurring in the mass spectrometer is discussed.     

Unexpected Direct Hydride Transfer Mechanism for the Hydrogenation of Ethyl Acetate to Ethanol Catalyzed by SNS Pincer Ruthenium Complexes

The hydrogenation of ethyl acetate to ethanol catalyzed by SNS pincer ruthenium complexes was computationally investigated by using DFT. Different from a previously proposed mechanism with fac‐[(SNS)Ru(PPh₃)(H)₂] ( 5′ ) as the catalyst, an unexpected direct hydride transfer mechanism with a mer‐SNS ruthenium complex as the catalyst, and two cascade catalytic cycles for hydrogenations of ethyl acetate to aldehyde and aldehyde to ethanol, is proposed base on our calculations. The new mechanism features ethanol‐assisted proton transfer for H₂ cleavage, direct hydride transfer from ruthenium to the carbonyl carbon, and C?OEt bond cleavage. Calculation results indicate that the rate‐determining step in the whole catalytic reaction is the transfer of a hydride from ruthenium to the carbonyl carbon of ethyl acetate, with a total free energy barrier of only 26.9 kcal mol^?1, which is consistent with experimental observations and significantly lower than the relative free energy of an intermediate in a previously postulated mechanism with 5′ as the catalyst.     

The variation of coordination modes of aromatic imines in iron carbonyl complexes: Is there a correlation between bond lengths in organometallic model compounds and the reactivity of the ligands in catalytic C-C bond formation reactions?

The reaction of aromatic imines with Fe₂(CO)₉ proceeds via a two-step reaction sequence. A C-H activation reaction in ortho-position with respect to the exocyclic imine function is followed by an intramolecular hydrogen transfer reaction towards the former imine carbon atom. The resulting dinuclear iron carbonyl complexes show an aza-ferra-cyclopentadiene ligand which is apically coordinated by the second iron tricarbonyl moiety. Comparing the bond lengths of 43 different compounds, which were synthesized and structurally characterized in our group shows that the iron iron bond length correlates with one of the iron carbon bond lengths. The longer the iron carbon bond between the apically coordinated iron atom and the carbon atom next to the former imine carbon atom is, the shorter is the iron iron bond. The same ligands may be used as the substrates in ruthenium catalyzed C-C bond formation reactions. Whereas most of the imines react via the formal insertion of CO and/or ethylene into the C-H bond in ortho-position to the imine function, the ligands that show the longest iron carbon bond lengths in the model compounds under the same reaction conditions produce different types of isoindolones.     

Ligand properties of aromatic azines: C-H activation, metal induced disproportionation and catalytic C-C coupling reactions

The reaction of aromatic azines with Fe₂(CO)₉ yields dinuclear iron carbonyl cluster compounds as the main products. The formation of these compounds may be rationalized by a C-H activation reaction at the aromatic substituent in ortho position with respect to the exocyclic C-N double bond followed by an intramolecular shift of the corresponding hydrogen atom toward the former imine carbon atom. The second imine function of the ligand does not react. Additional products arise from the metal induced disproportionation of the azine into a primary imine and a nitrile. So also one of the imine C-H bonds may be activated during the reaction. Depending on the aromatic substituent of the azine ligands iron carbonyl complexes of the disproportionation products are isolated and characterized by X-ray crystallography. C-C coupling reactions catalyzed by Ru₃(CO)₁₂ result in the formation of ortho-substituted azines. In addition, ortho-substituted nitriles are identified as side-products showing that the metal induced disproportionation reaction also takes place under catalytic conditions.     

Alkali Metal Covalent Bonding in Nickel Carbonyl Complexes ENi(CO)3−

The alkali metal‐nickel carbonyl anions ENi(CO)₃^? with E=Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs have been produced and characterized by mass‐selected infrared photodissociation spectroscopy in the gas phase. The molecules are the first examples of 18‐electron transition metal complexes with alkali atoms as covalently bonded ligands. The calculated equilibrium structures possess C_3v geometry, where the alkali atom is located above a nearly planar Ni(CO)₃^? fragment. The analysis of the electronic structure reveals a peculiar bonding situation where the alkali atom is covalently bonded not only to Ni but also to the carbon atoms.     

Two molybdenum pentacarbonyl complexes with electroneutral phosphane ligands: [bis(morpholin‐4‐yl)(pentafluoroethyl)phosphane‐κP]pentacarbonylmolybdenum(0) and pentacarbonyl[(pentafluoroethyl)bis(piperidin‐1‐yl)phosphane‐κP]molybdenum(0)

The crystal structures of the title compounds, [Mo{(C₄H₈NO)₂P(C₂F₅)}(CO)₅], (1a), and [Mo{(C₅H₁₀N)₂P(C₂F₅)}(CO)₅], (2a), were determined as part of a larger project that focuses on the synthesis and coordination chemistry of phosphane ligands possessing moderate (electroneutral, i.e. neither electron‐rich nor electron‐deficient) electronic characteristics. Both complexes feature a slightly distorted octahedral geometry at the metal center, due to the electronic and steric repulsions between two of the four equatorial CO groups and the pentafluoroethyl group attached to the phosphane ligand. Bond length and angle data for (1a) and (2a) support the conclusion that the free phosphane ligands are electroneutral. For complex (1a), the Mo—P, Mo—C_ax and Mo—C_eq(ave) bond lengths are 2.5063 (5), 2.018 (2) and 2.048 (2) Å, respectively, and for complex (2a) these values are 2.5274 (5), 2.009 (3) and 2.050 (3) Å, respectively. Geometric data for (1a) and (2a) are compared with similar data reported for analogous Mo(CO)₅ complexes.     

Facile Carbon–Fluorine Bond Activation and Subsequent Functionalisation of 1,1‐Difluoroethylene and Tetrafluoroethylene Promoted by Adjacent Metal Centres

The bridging fluoroolefin ligands in the complexes [Ir₂(CH₃)(CO)₂(μ‐olefin)(dppm)₂][OTf] (olefin=tetrafluoroethylene, 1,1‐difluoroethylene; dppm=μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂; OTf^?=CF₃SO₃^?) are susceptible to facile fluoride ion abstraction. Both fluoroolefin complexes react with trimethylsilyltriflate (Me₃SiOTf) to give the corresponding fluorovinyl products by abstraction of a single fluoride ion. Although the trifluorovinyl ligand is bound to one metal, the monofluorovinyl group is bridging, bound to one metal through carbon and to the other metal through a dative bond from fluorine. Addition of two equivalents of Me₃SiOTf to the tetrafluoroethylene‐bridged species gives the difluorovinylidene‐bridged product [Ir₂(CH₃)(OTf)(CO)₂(μ‐OTf)(μ‐C?CF₂)(dppm)₂][OTf]. The 1,1‐difluoroethylene species is exceedingly reactive, reacting with water to give 2‐fluoropropene and [Ir₂(CO)₂(μ‐OH)(dppm)₂][OTf] and with carbon monoxide to give [Ir₂(CO)₃(μ‐κ¹:η²‐C?CCH₃)(dppm)₂][OTf] together with two equivalents of HF. The trifluorovinyl product [Ir₂(κ¹‐C₂F₃)(OTf)(CO)₂(μ‐H)(μ‐CH₂)(dppm)₂][OTf], obtained through single C? F bond activation of the tetrafluoroethylene‐bridged complex, reacts with H₂ to form trifluoroethylene, allowing the facile replacement of one fluorine in C₂F₄ with hydrogen.     

Fundamental Differences between Group 8 Metals: Unexpected Oxidation State Preferences and Mechanisms in Ruthenium Borylene Complex Formation

The reaction of the salts K[Ru(CO)₃(PMe₃)(SiR₃)] (R=Me, Et) with Br₂BDur or Cl₂BDur (Dur=2,3,5,6‐Me₄C₆H) leads to both boryl and borylene complexes of divalent ruthenium, the former through simple salt elimination and the latter through subsequent CO loss and 1,2‐halide shift. The balance of products can be altered by varying the reaction conditions; boryl complexes can be favored by the addition of CO, and borylene complexes by removal of CO under vacuum. All of these products are in competition with the corresponding (aryl)(halo)(trialkylsilyl)borane, a reductive elimination product. The Ru^II borylene products and the mechanisms that form them are distinctly different from the analogous reactions with iron, which lead to low‐valent borylene complexes, highlighting fundamental differences in oxidation state preferences between iron and ruthenium.     

Triple Bonds Between Iron and Heavier Group 15 Elements in AFe(CO)3− (A=As,Sb, Bi) Complexes

Heteronuclear transition‐metal–main‐group‐element carbonyl complexes of AsFe(CO)₃⁻, SbFe(CO)₃⁻, and BiFe(CO)₃⁻ were produced by a laser vaporization supersonic ion source in the gas phase, and were studied by mass‐selected IR photodissociation spectroscopy and advanced quantum chemistry methods. These complexes have C_3v structures with all of the carbonyl ligands bonded on the iron center, and feature covalent triple bonds between bare Group 15 elements and Fe(CO)₃⁻. Chemical bonding analyses on the whole series of AFe(CO)₃⁻ (A=N, P, As, Sb, Bi, Mc) complexes indicate that the valence orbitals involved in the triple bonds are hybridized 3d and 4p atomic orbitals of iron, leading to an unusual (dp–p) type of transition‐metal–main‐group‐element multiple bonding. The σ‐type three‐orbital interaction between Fe 3d/4p and Group 15 np valence orbitals plays an important role in the bonding and stability of the heavier AFe(CO)₃⁻ (A=As, Sb, Bi) complexes.