New rac‐XP(O)(OC6H5)(NHC6H4‐p‐CH3) [X = N(CH3)(cyclo‐C6H11) and NH(C3H5)] and rac‐(C6H5CH2NH)P(O)(OC6H5)(NH‐cyclo‐C6H11) mixed‐amide phosphinates

The mixed‐amide phosphinates, rac‐phenyl (N‐methylcyclohexylamido)(p‐tolylamido)phosphinate, C₂₀H₂₇N₂O₂P, (I), and rac‐phenyl (allylamido)(p‐tolylamido)phosphinate, C₁₆H₁₉N₂O₂P, (II), were synthesized from the racemic phosphorus–chlorine compound (R,S)‐(Cl)P(O)(OC₆H₅)(NHC₆H₄‐p‐CH₃). Furthermore, the phosphorus–chlorine compound ClP(O)(OC₆H₅)(NH‐cyclo‐C₆H₁₁) was synthesized for the first time and used for the synthesis of rac‐phenyl (benzylamido)(cyclohexylamido)phosphinate, C₁₉H₂₅N₂O₂P, (III). The strategies for the synthesis of racemic mixed‐amide phosphinates are discussed. The P atom in each compound is in a distorted tetrahedral (N¹)P(=O)(O)(N²) environment. In (I) and (II), the p‐tolylamido substituent makes a longer P—N bond than those involving the N‐methylcyclohexylamido and allylamido substituents. In (III), the differences between the P—N bond lengths involving the cyclohexylamido and benzylamido substituents are not significant. In all three structures, the phosphoryl O atom takes part with the N—H unit in hydrogen‐bonding interactions, viz. an N—H...O=P hydrogen bond for (I) and (N—H)(N—H)...O=P hydrogen bonds for (II) and (III), building linear arrangements along [001] for (I) and along [010] for (III), and a ladder arrangement along [100] for (II).     

Synthesis and Characterization of m‐Terphenyl (1,3‐Diphenylbenzene) Compounds Containing Trifluoromethyl Groups

The bis(silyl)triazene compound 2,6‐(Me₃Si)₂‐4‐Me‐1‐(N?N? NC₄H₈)C₆H₂ ( 4 ) was synthesized by double lithiation/silylation of 2,6‐Br₂‐4‐Me‐1‐(N?N? NC₄H₈)C₆H₂ ( 1 ). Furthermore, 2,6‐bis[3,5‐(CF₃)₂‐C₆H₃]‐4‐Me‐C₆H₂‐1‐(N?N? NC₄H₈)C₆H₂ derivative 6 can be easily synthesized by a C,C‐bond formation reaction of 1 with the corresponding aryl‐Grignard reagent, i.e., 3,5‐bis[(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]magnesium bromide. Reactions of compound 4 with KI and 6 with I₂ afforded in good yields novel phenyl derivatives, 2,6‐(Me₃Si)₂‐4‐MeC₆H₂? I and 2,6‐bis[3,5‐(CF₃)₂? C₆H₃]‐4‐MeC₆H₂? I ( 5 and 7 , resp.). On the other hand, the analogous m‐terphenyl 1,3‐diphenylbenzene compound 2,6‐bis[3,5‐(CF₃)₂? C₆H₃]C₆H₃? I ( 8 ) could be obtained in moderate yield from the reaction of (2,6‐dichlorophenyl)lithium and 2 equiv. of aryl‐Grignard reagent, followed by the reaction with I₂. Different attempts to introduce the ^tBu (Me₃C) or neophyl (PhC(Me)₂CH₂) substituents in the central ring were unsuccessful. All the compounds were fully characterized by elemental analysis, melting point, IR and NMR spectroscopy. The structure of compound 6 was corroborated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction measurements.     

An axial tert‐butyl group in strained cyclohexene: X‐ray analysis and theoretical calculations of 2‐(2‐tert‐butylcyclohex‐3‐enyl)propan‐2‐ol

The structure of the title compound, C₁₃H₂₄O, (I), shows a sofa conformation of the ring with two pseudo‐axial substituents. The dihedral angle between these substituents is 131.56 (12)°. Calculations using the B3LYP/6‐31G* level of theory show two minima, one corresponding to the crystal structure and the other to a boat conformation of the ring with two equatorial substituents. The energy of this latter conformation is 17.4 kcal mol⁻¹ higher than that of (I). The molecule forms an infinite co‐operative hydrogen‐bonded chain running in the b direction.     

Charge‐assisted N—H·I and C—H·I hydrogen bonding in (1R,2S)‐1‐(ferrocenylmethyl)‐2‐(methoxymethyl)pyrrolidinium iodide

In the title compound, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₂H₁₉NO)]I, the ferrocene moiety has an eclipsed conformation, with mean Fe—C bond lengths of 2.031 (4) and 2.020 (6) Å for the substituted and unsubstituted cyclo­penta­dienyl rings. The pyrrolidinium heterocycle adopts an envelope conformation and has its 1‐ and 2‐substituents in a relative trans disposition. Strong (+/−)‐charge‐assisted N—H·I and C—H·I hydrogen bonds are present. The crystal structure is also stabilized by weak C—H·O interactions.     

β-Diketiminato Rare-Earth Metal Complexes: The Influence of Monoatomic Substituents in the N-aryl Moieties on Structures and Properties

Treatment of β-diketiminate ligands bearing different N-aryl monoatomic substituents [HL^H = (C₆H₅)N = C(Me)CH=C(Me)NH(C₆H₅), HL^F = (2,6-F₂C₆H₃)N=C(Me)CH=C(Me)NH(2,6-F₂C₆H₃), and HL^Cl = (2,6-Cl₂C₆H₃)N=C(Me)CH=C(Me)NH(2,6-Cl₂C₆H₃)] with Ln(CH₂SiMe₃)₃(THF)₂ (Ln = Y and Lu) afforded a variety of β-diketiminato rare-earth metal complexes depending on substituents, namely, phenyl ring C–H bond activated complexes (L')(L^H)Lu(THF) ( 1b , L' = (C₆H₄)N = C(Me)CH=C(Me)N(C₆H₅)), six-coordinate homoleptic complexes (L^H)₃Ln [Ln = Y ( 1aa ), Lu ( 1bb )], five-coordinate monoalkyl complexes (L^F)₂Ln(CH₂SiMe₃) [Ln = Y ( 2a ), Lu ( 2b )], and four-coordinate dialkyl complexes (L^Cl)Ln(CH₂SiMe₃)₂ [Ln = Y ( 3a ), Lu ( 3b )]. All these complexes were characterized with NMR spectroscopy, and lutetium complexes 1b , 1bb and 3b were structurally validated by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Moreover, dialkyl complexes 3 promoted the polymerization of 2-vinylpyridine (2-VP) to produce atactic poly(2-vinylpyridine) (P2VP) with quantitative yield. On activation with an equimolar amount of [Ph₃C][B(C₆F₅)₄], complexes 3 afforded highly isotactic P2VP with an mm value up to 94 %. Both ¹H NMR spectrum and MALDI-TOF mass analysis of an oligomer indicate that the polymerization was initiated by coordination insertion of 2-VP into the Y-CH₂SiMe₃ bond.     

Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von Tris‐, Bis‐ und Mono(2,4‐dimethylpentadienyl)‐Komplexen des Neodyms,Lanthans und des Yttriums

The tris(2,4‐dimethylpentadienyl) complexes [Ln(η⁵‐Me₂C₅H₅)₃] (Ln = Nd, La, Y) are obtained analytically pure by reaction of the tribromides LnBr₃·nTHF with the potassium compound K(Me₂C₅H₅)(thf)_n in THF in good yields. The structural characterization is carried out by X‐ray crystal structure analysis and NMR‐spectroscopically. The tris complexes can be transformed into the dimeric bis(2,4‐dimethylpentadienyl) complexes [Ln₂(η⁵‐Me₂C₅H₅)₄X₂] (Ln, X: Nd, Cl, Br, I; La, Br, I; Y, Br) by reaction with the trihalides THF solvates in the molar ratio 2:1 in toluene. Structure and bonding conditions are determined for selected compounds by X‐ray crystal structure analysis and NMR‐spectroscopically in general. The dimer‐monomer equilibrium existing in solution was investigated NMR‐spectroscopically in dependence of the donor strength of the solvent and could be established also by preparation of the corresponding monomer neutral ligand complexes [Ln(η⁵‐Me₂C₅H₅)₂X(L)] (Ln, X, L: Nd, Br, py; La, Cl, thf; Br, py; Y, Br, thf). Finally the possibilities for preparation of mono(2,4‐dimethylpentadienyl)lanthanoid(III)‐dibromid complexes are shown and the hexameric structure of the lanthanum complex [La₆(η⁵‐Me₂C₅H₅)₆Br₁₂(thf)₄] is proved by X‐ray crystal structure analysis.     

N-(2-吡咯甲基)-1-苯基乙亚胺·二甲基铝的合成、结构及其催化丙交酯的活性

通过席夫碱配体N-（2-吡咯甲基）-1-苯基乙亚胺与三乙基铝按物质的量之比为1：1在无氧无水的条件下反应,合成了席夫碱铝的有机金属化合物N-（2-吡咯甲基）-1-苯基乙亚胺·二甲基铝。其结构分别用核磁氢谱、碳谱,元素分析和X射线单晶衍射技术进行了表征。铝化合物在催化外消旋丙交酯开环聚合反应中表现出了中等的活性并得到了以等规聚合为主的高聚物。     

A benzene‐rich pseudopolymorph of bis[μ‐1,3‐bis(pentafluorophenyl)propane‐1,3‐dionato]‐κ3O,O′:O′;κ3O:O,O′‐bis{aqua[1,3‐bis(pentafluorophenyl)propane‐1,3‐dionato‐κ2O,O′]nickel(II)} benzene tetrasolvate

The title complex comprises two Ni²⁺ ions, four fluorinated ligands and two water molecules in a centrosymmetric dinuclear complex. This compound was crystallized from benzene–CH₂Cl₂, and two types of crystals, viz. the title benzene tetrasolvate, [Ni₂(C₁₅HF₁₀O₂)₄(H₂O)₂]·4C₆H₆, (I), and the previously reported benzene disolvate, [Ni₂(C₁₅HF₁₀O₂)₄(H₂O)₂]·2C₆H₆, (II) [Hori et al. (2009). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 82 , 96–98], were obtained as pseudopolymorphs. In the crystal structure of (I), the four benzene solvent molecules interact closely with all the pentafluorophenyl groups of the complex through arene–perfluoroarene interactions. The molecular structures of the two compounds show essentially the same conformation, although the benzene molecules are accommodated in a columnar packing in (I), while they are isolated from each other in (II).     

Optically active transition-metal compounds: XXII. Stereochemistry and crystal structure determination of (η5-C5H5)CoI(NC4H3C(R)=N(S)-CH(CH3)(C6H5)) (R = H,CH3)

The crystal structures and absolute configurations of (η⁵-C₅H₅)-CoI(NC₄H₃-C(R)=N(S)-CH(CH₃)(C₆H₅)) (R = H, compound I; R = CH₃, compound II) have been determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction. Crystals of compound I are orthorhombic, with a 11.084(6), b 12.107(6) and c 13.121(7) Å, space group ^P2₁2₁2₁ and d (calcd, Z = 4) 1.69 g cm^?3 The structure was solved by the Patterson technique and refined with use of full matrix least-squares methods to R(F) = 0.031 and R_w(F) = 0.028. Compound II is nearly isomorphous and isostructural; a 11.246(6), b 11.923(6) and c 13.370(7) Å, d(calc., Z = 4) 1.71 g cm^?3 and was refined to the final agreement factors of R(F) = 0.044 and R_w(F) = 0.035. The Co atom has a distorted tetrahedral coordination, with Co-I 2.595(2) for I and 2.607(2) Å for II; Co-(η⁵-C₅H₅ ring centroid) 1.681(4) and 1.703(5) Å; Co-N(pyrrole) 1.905(9) and 1.885(9) Å; Co-N(imine) 1.971(8) and 2.003(9) Å, all the parameters being well within values found in the literature. The configuration around the chiral carbon of the phenylethylamine is S for both compounds, whereas the configuration around the metal is R in I and S in II. The different metal configurations in I and II have their origin in the two different substituents (R = H, CH₃) at the imine carbon atoms of the chelate ring, which induce completely different conformations of the (S)-CH(CH₃)(C₆H₅) moiety in the two complexes. For both compounds the thermodynamically less stable isomer is enriched upon crystallization. Also, for compound I the solution and solid state conformations are almost opposite to each other, the conformation in the solid reflecting intramolecular interactions (phenyl/C₅H₅ attraction).     

N-(2-吡咯甲基)-1-苯基乙亚胺·二甲基铝的合成、结构及其催化丙交酯的活性

通过席夫碱配体N-（2-吡咯甲基）-1-苯基乙亚胺与三乙基铝按物质的量之比为1：1在无氧无水的条件下反应,合成了席夫碱铝的有机金属化合物N-（2-吡咯甲基）-1-苯基乙亚胺·二甲基铝。其结构分别用核磁氢谱、碳谱,元素分析和X射线单晶衍射技术进行了表征。铝化合物在催化外消旋丙交酯开环聚合反应中表现出了中等的活性并得到了以等规聚合为主的高聚物。     

Mass spectra of 5-fluorouracil derivatives. N-1-substituted sulfonyl derivatives

The electron impact mass spectra of 1-sulfonyl substituted derivatives of 5-fluorouracil were investigated. The substituents were CH₃SO₂ (compound I), CH₃(CH₂)₃SO₂ (II), C₆H₅SO₂ (III) and p-CH₃C₆H₄SO₂ (IV).     

Self‐Assembly of Discrete Copper(I)‐Halide Complexes with Diacylthioureas

Three diacylthioureas 1,4‐C₆H₄[C(O)NHC(S)NHAr]₂ (Ar = 2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃) ( L¹ , 1 ), 1,3‐C₆H₄[C(O)NHC(S)NHAr]₂ ( L² , 2 ), and 1,3‐C₆H₄[C(O)NHC(S)NHAr′]₂ (Ar′ = 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃) ( L³ , 3 ) were synthesized and characterized. The Cu^I complexes from the reactions of bipodal ligands Lⁿ with CuX (X = Cl, Br, I) were structurally investigated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction methods. Treatment of L¹ with CuX gave the metallamacrocyclic complexes ( L¹ CuX)₂ [X = Cl ( 4 ), Br ( 5 ), I ( 6 )] with the ligand to metal in a ratio of 2:2, where both sulfur and halide anions function as terminal substituents. In contrast, when L² or L³ was reacted with CuBr, the two Lⁿ ligands coordinate to four copper atoms each in a bridging and terminal fashion to yield [ Lⁿ (CuBr)₂]₂ [n = 2 ( 7 ), 3 ( 8 )]. The obtained S₄Cu₄Br₄ core contains all four bromide anions in bridging positions. The reaction of L³ with CuX (X = Cl, I) gave the 3:3 trinuclear complexes ( L³ CuX)₃ [X = Cl ( 9 ) I ( 10 )], interconnected by halide bridges. The obtained diacylthioureas ( 1 – 3 ) and their Cu^I complexes ( 4 – 10 ) were also characterized by elemental analysis, FT‐IR, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy.     

[(η5‐C5R5)TiCl2(η5‐C5H4SiMe2)]2O·nCH2Cl2

The first title metallocene, 1,3‐bis(dichlorotitanocene)‐1,1,3,3‐tetramethyldisiloxane dichloromethane solvate, [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)­TiCl₂­(η⁵‐C₅H₄­Si­Me₂)]₂O·­CH₂Cl₂, (I), crystallizes in space group P2₁/c. Compound (I) represents the first crystal structure of a bimetallic siloxy‐bridged titanocene. The geometric parameters of (I) are similar to those of the parent titanocene; however, the disiloxane substituents adopt an unexpected eclipsed conformation. The second title metallocene, 1,3‐bis­[(penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­dienyl)­(cyclo­penta­dien­yl)­titanium dichloride]‐1,1,3,3‐tetra­methyl­disiloxane, [(η⁵‐C₅‐Me₅)­TiCl₂­(η⁵‐C₅H₄­Si­Me₂)]₂O, (II), represents the second crystal structure of a bimetallic siloxy‐bridged titanocene and crystallizes in the space group P2₁/n. Compound (I) possesses non‐crystallographic twofold molecular symmetry and both metal centers adopt pseudo‐tetrahedral geometries. The geometric parameters of (II) are similar to those of the mixed titanocene Cp*CpTiCl₂ (Cp* = C₅Me₅) and the disiloxane substituents adopt a staggered conformation.     

An organic–inorganic hybrid compound containing imidazolium cations and a one‐dimensional lithium hexacyanidocobaltate‐based anionic framework

An organic–inorganic hybrid compound, catena‐poly[bis(3H‐imidazol‐1‐ium) [[tetracyanido‐κ⁴C‐cobalt(III)]‐μ‐cyanido‐κ²C:N‐[diaqualithium(I)]‐μ‐cyanido‐κ²N:C]], {(C₃H₅N₂)₂[CoLi(CN)₆(H₂O)₂]}_n, was synthesized by the reaction of Li₃[Co(CN)₆] with imidazolium chloride in aqueous solution. The compound crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c (data collected at 273 K). In the crystal structure, neighbouring [Co(CN)₆]³⁻ anionic units are linked by Li⁺ cations through the cyanide groups in a trans mode, forming a one‐dimensional zigzag chain structure extending along the c axis. A three‐dimensional supramolecular network is formed through hydrogen‐bonding interactions and is further stabilized by weak CN...π interactions between the cyanide groups and the imidazolium cations.     

Tunable Fluorophores Based on 2‐(N‐Arylimino)pyrrolyl Chelates of Diphenylboron: Synthesis,Structure, Photophysical Characterization,and Application in OLEDs

Reactions of 2‐(N‐arylimino)pyrroles (HNC₄H₃C(H)?N‐Ar) with triphenylboron (BPh₃) in boiling toluene afford the respective highly emissive N,N′‐boron chelate complexes, [BPh₂{κ²N,N′‐NC₄H₃C(H)?N‐Ar}] (Ar=C₆H₅ ( 12 ), 2,6‐Me₂‐C₆H₃ ( 13 ), 2,6‐iPr₂‐C₆H₃ ( 14 ), 4‐OMe‐C₆H₄ ( 15 ), 3,4‐Me₂‐C₆H₃ ( 16 ), 4‐F‐C₆H₄ ( 17 ), 4‐NO₂‐C₆H₄ ( 18 ), 4‐CN‐C₆H₄ ( 19 ), 3,4,5‐F₃‐C₆H₂ ( 20 ), and C₆F₅ ( 21 )) in moderate to high yields. The photophysical properties of these new boron complexes largely depend on the substituents present on the aryl rings of their N‐arylimino moieties. The complexes bearing electron‐withdrawing aniline substituents 17 – 20 show more intense (e.g., ?_f=0.71 for Ar=4‐CN‐C₆H₄ ( 19 ) in THF), higher‐energy (blue) fluorescent emission compared to those bearing electron‐donating substituents, for which the emission is redshifted at the expense of lower quantum yields (?_f=0.13 and 0.14 for Ar=4‐OMe‐C₆H₄ ( 15 ) and 3,4‐Me₂‐C₆H₃ ( 16 ), respectively, in THF). The presence of substituents bulkier than a hydrogen atom at the 2,6‐positions of the aryl groups strongly restricts rotation of this moiety towards coplanarity with the iminopyrrolyl ligand framework, inducing a shift in the emission to the violet region (λ_max=410–465 nm) and a significant decrease in quantum yield (?_f=0.005, 0.023, and 0.20 for Ar=2,6‐Me₂‐C₆H₃ ( 13 ), 2,6‐iPr₂‐C₆H₃ ( 14 ), and C₆F₅ ( 21 ), respectively, in THF), even when electron‐withdrawing groups are also present. Density functional theory (DFT) and time‐dependent DFT (TD‐DFT) calculations have indicated that the excited singlet state has a planar aryliminopyrrolyl ligand, except when prevented by steric hindrance (ortho substituents). Calculated absorption maxima reproduce the experimental values, but the error is higher for the emission wavelengths. Organic light‐emitting diodes (OLEDs) have been fabricated with the new boron complexes, with luminances of the order of 3000 cd m^?2 being achieved for a green‐emitting device.     

Efficient Diastereoselective Synthesis of Chiral Diferrocenylphosphine‐diamines: X‐ray Crystal Structure of [(η5‐C5H5)Fe{(η5‐C5H3)PPh2CH(CH3) N(CH2)2(CH2)2NCH(CH3)PPh2 (η5‐C5H3)}Fe(η5‐C5H5)]

Abstract

Three novel chiral planar diferrocenylphosphine‐diamines 5 (a–c) were designed and synthesized starting with (s)‐(?)‐N,N‐dimethyl‐1‐ferrocenylethylamine‐1 [(S)‐1]. All new compounds were identified by ¹H NMR and MS. The structure of chiral diferrocenylphosphine‐diamine 5c was determined by X‐ray crystallography. Single crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis reveals that the molecular structure of compound 5c [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Fe{(η⁵‐C₅H₃)PPh₂CH(CH₃) N(CH₂)₂(CH₂)₂NCH(CH₃)PPh₂‐(η⁵‐C₅H₃)}Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] is enantiomerically pure and crystallizes in the noncentrosymmetric P2(1)2(1)2(1) space group; it maintains “Z” shape and contains a piperazine hexahydrate ring bridge. The piperazine ring adopts a favored chair conformation and the chiral center C₂₃ and C₂₉ substituents in S‐configuration.     

Three‐dimensional networks in the 1:2 organic salts 2,2′‐biimidazolium bis(3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate) and 2,2′‐bibenzimidazolium bis(3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate) trihydrate

The two title compounds of 2,2′‐biimidazole (Bim) with 5‐sulfosalicylic acid (5‐H₂SSA) and 2,2′‐bibenzimidazole (Bbim) with 5‐H₂SSA are 1:2 organic salts, viz. C₆H₈N₄²⁺·2C₇H₅O₆S⁻, (I), and C₁₄H₁₂N₄²⁺·2C₇H₅O₆S⁻·3H₂O, (II). The cation of compound (I) lies on a centre of inversion, whereas that of (II) lies on a twofold axis. Whilst compound (I) is anhydrous, three water molecules are incorporated into the crystal structure of (II). The substitution of imidazole H atoms by other chemical groups may favour the incorporation of water molecules into the crystal structure. In both compounds, the component cations and anions adopt a homogeneous arrangement, forming alternating cation and anion layers which run parallel to the (001) plane in (I) and to the (100) plane in (II). By a combination of N—H...O, O—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen bonds, the ions in both compounds are linked into three‐dimensional networks. In addition, π–π interactions are observed between symmetry‐related benzene rings of Bbim²⁺ cations in (II).     

fac,trans‐[(2,2′‐Bipyridine‐N,N′)tricarbonylrhenium(I)]‐μ‐(4,4′‐bipyridine)‐N:N′‐{chlorobis[1,2‐phenylenebis(dimethylarsine)]ruthenium(II)} bis(hexafluorophosphate) diacetone solvate

The crystal structure of the heterobimetallic title compound, [ReRuCl(C₁₀H₁₆As₂)₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂(CO)₃](PF₆)₂·2C₃H₆O, is described. Both metal centres have pseudo‐octahedral coordination geometries, with a facial arrangement of the carbonyl ligands at Re^I and a trans disposition of the diarsine ligands at Ru^II. The dihedral angle between the pyridyl rings of the 4,4′‐bi­pyridine bridging ligand is 13.9 (6)°.     

Iodinated ortho‐Carboranes as Versatile Building Blocks to Design Intermolecular Interactions in Crystal Lattices

The crystal structures of numerous iodinated ortho‐carboranes have been studied, which has revealed the diversity of intermolecular interactions that these substances can adopt in the solid state. The nature—mostly as it relates to hydrogen and/or halogen bonds—and relative strength of such interactions can be adjusted by selectively introducing substituents onto the cluster, thus enabling the rational design of crystal lattices. In this work we present the newly determined crystal structures of the following iodinated ortho‐carboranes: 9‐I‐1,2‐closo‐C₂B₁₀H₁₁, 4,5,7,8,9,10,11,12‐I₈‐1,2‐closo‐C₂B₁₀H₄, 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12‐I₁₀‐1,2‐closo‐C₂B₁₀H₂, 1‐Me‐8,9,10,12‐I₄‐1,2‐closo‐C₂B₁₀H₇, 1,2‐Me₂‐8,9,10,12‐I₄‐1,2‐closo‐C₂B₁₀H₆, and 1,2‐Ph₂‐8,9,10,12‐I₄‐1,2‐closo‐C₂B₁₀H₆. Their 3D supramolecular organization has been thoroughly investigated and compared to similar previously published crystal structures. Such a systematic survey has allowed us to draw some general trends. C_c? H???I? B hydrogen bonds (C_c= cluster carbon atoms) appear to be significant in the growth of the crystal lattices of these compounds, given the acidity of hydrogen atoms bonded to C_c, and the polarization of B? I bonds. These hydrogen bonds can be disrupted by selectively blocking the positions next to C_c, that is, B(3) and B(6), with bulky substituents that prevent iodine atoms from approaching as hydrogen acceptors. Halogen bonds of the type B? I???I? B are frequently observed in most cases, thus suggesting that these interactions could be attractive in boron clusters. In addition, different substituents can be grafted onto the ortho‐carborane surface, thereby providing further possibilities for homomeric or heteromeric molecular assembly.     

Bis(1‐ferrocenylbutane‐1,3‐dionato‐κ2O,O′)copper(II) and bis­(1,3‐diferrocenylpropane‐1,3‐dionato‐κ2O,O′)­copper(II)

The title compounds, [CuFe₂(C₅H₅)₂(C₉H₈O₂)₂], (I), and [CuFe₄(C₅H₅)₄(C₁₃H₉O₂)₂], (II), are four‐coordinate square‐planar copper(II) complexes with two bidentate 1‐ferrocenylbutane‐1,3‐dionate or 1,3‐diferrocenylpropane‐1,3‐dionate ligands, respectively. The copper ion in (I) lies on an inversion centre, with one‐half of the mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit, while in (II), there are two independent half mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, with the copper ions also situated on inversion centres. The ferrocene substituents in (I) are in an anti arrangement. The mol­ecules assemble in the crystal structure in layers with ferrocene groups at the surface. The pairs of ferrocene substituents on each ligand in complex (II) are syn and these adopt an anti arrangement with respect to the pair on the other diketonate ligand. As found in (I), complexes assemble in a layered structure with ferrocene‐coated surfaces.