Reactions of Cyclohexyl Isocyanide with η5‐Substituted Cyclo‐pentadienyl MoMo Triply Bonded Complexes. Crystal Structure of [Mo(CO)2(η5‐C5H4CO2CH3)]2(μ‐η2‐CNC6H11)

Reactions of one or two equiv. of cyclohexyl isocyanide in THF at room temperature with Mo?Mo triply bonded complexes [Mo(CO)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₄R)]₂ (R=COCH₃, CO₂CH₃) gave the isocyanide coordinated Mo? Mo singly bonded complexes with functionally substituted cyclopentadienyl ligands, [Mo(CO)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₄R)]₂(μ‐η²‐CNC₆H₁₁) ( 1a , R=COCH₃; 1b , R=CO₂CH₃) and [Mo(CO)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₄R)(CNC₆H₁₁)]₂ ( 2a , R=COCH₃; 2b , R=CO₂CH₃), respectively. Complexes 1a , 1b and 2a , 2b could be more conveniently prepared by thermal decarbonylation of Mo? Mo singly bonded complexes [Mo(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₄R)]₂ (R=COCH₃, CO₂CH₃) in toluene at reflux, followed by treatment of the resulting Mo?Mo triply bonded complexes [Mo(CO)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₄R)]₂ (R=COCH₃, CO₂CH₃) in situ with cyclohexyl isocyanide. While 1a , 1b and 2a , 2b were characterized by elemental analysis and spectroscopy, 1b was further characterized by X‐ray crystallography.     

Synthesis of double silylene‐bridged binuclear zirconium complexes and their use as catalysts for olefin polymerization

New double silylene‐bridged binuclear zirconium complexes [(η⁵‐RC₅H₄)ZrCl₂]₂[μ,μ‐(SiMe₂)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₃)₂] [R = H ( 1 ), Me ( 2 ), ⁿPr ( 3 ), ⁱPr ( 4 ), ⁿBu ( 5 ), allyl ( 6 ), 3‐butenyl ( 7 ), benzyl ( 8 ), PhCH₂CH₂ ( 9 ), MeOCH₂CH₂ ( 10 )] were synthesized by the reaction of (η⁵‐RC₅H₄)ZrCl₃·DME with [μ,μ‐(SiMe₂)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₃)₂]^2? ( L^2? ) in THF, and they were all well characterized by ¹H NMR, MS, IR, and EA. The binuclear structure of Complex 3 was further confirmed by X‐ray diffraction, where the two zirconium centers are located trans relative to the bridging [μ,μ‐(SiMe₂)₂(η⁵‐C₅H₃)₂] moiety. When activated with methylaluminoxane (MAO), this series of zirconium complexes are highly active catalysts for the polymerization of ethylene even under very low molar ratio of Al/Zr (Complex 7 , 5.41 × 10⁵ g‐PE/mol‐Zr·h, Al/Zr = 50) and linear polyethylenes (PEs) with broad molecular weight distribution (MWD, M_w/M_n = 7.31–27.6) was obtained. The copolymerization experiments indicate that these complexes are also very efficient in the incorporation of 1‐hexene into the growing PE chain in the presence of MAO (Complex 6 , 3.59 × 10⁶ g‐PE/mol‐Zr·h; 1‐hexene content, 3.65%). © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 4901–4913, 2007     

Diimido‐, Imido(oxo)‐, Dioxo‐ und Imido(alkyliden)‐Halbsandwich‐Verbindungen über selektive Hydrolyse und α—H‐Abstraktion an Organylkomplexen des sechswertigen Molybdäns und Wolframs

Diimido, Imido Oxo, Dioxo, and Imido Alkylidene Halfsandwich Compounds via Selective Hydrolysis and α—H Abstraction in Molybdenum(VI) and Tungsten(VI) Organyl Complexes Organometal imides [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)₂Ph] (M = Mo, W, R = H, Me, R′ = Mes, tBu) 4 — 8 can be prepared by reaction of halfsandwich complexes [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)₂Cl] with phenyl lithium in good yields. Starting from phenyl complexes 4 — 8 as well as from previously described methyl compounds [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)₂Me] (M = Mo, W), reactions with aqueous HCl lead to imido(oxo) methyl and phenyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)(O)(R)] M = Mo, R = Me ( 9 ), Ph ( 10 ); M = W, R = Ph ( 11 ) and dioxo complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(O)₂(CH₃)] M = Mo ( 12 ), M = W ( 13 ). Hydrolysis of organometal imides with conservation of M‐C σ and π bonds is in fact an attractive synthetic alternative for the synthesis of organometal oxides with respect to known strategies based on the oxidative decarbonylation of low valent alkyl CO and NO complexes. In a similar manner, protolysis of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)W(NtBu)₂(CH₃)] and [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Mo(NtBu)₂(CH₃)] by HCl gas leads to [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)W(NtBu)Cl₂(CH₃)] 14 und [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Mo(NtBu)Cl₂(CH₃)] 15 with conservation of the M‐C bonds. The inert character of the relatively non‐polar M‐C σ bonds with respect to protolysis offers a strategy for the synthesis of methyl chloro complexes not accessible by partial methylation of [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)Cl₃] with MeLi. As pure substances only trimethyl compounds [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NtBu)(CH₃)₃] 16 ‐ 18 , M = Mo, W, R = H, Me, are isolated. Imido(benzylidene) complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)(CHPh)(CH₂Ph)] M = Mo ( 19 ), W ( 20 ) are generated by alkylation of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)Cl₃] with PhCH₂MgCl via α‐H abstraction. Based on nmr data a trend of decreasing donor capability of the ligands [NtBu]^2— > [O]^2— > [CHR]^2— ? 2 [CH₃]^— > 2 [Cl]^— emerges.     

Synthesis reactivity and electrochemical properties of substituted cyclopentadienyl cobalt (III) complexes

Cyclopentadienyl cobalt complexes (η⁵‐C₅H₄R) CoLI₂ [L = CO,R=‐COOCH₂CH=CH₂ (3); L=PPh₃, R=‐COOCH₂‐CH=CH₂ (6); L=P(p‐C₆H₄O₃)₃, R = ‐COOC(CH₃) = CH₂ (7), ‐COOCH₂C₆H₅ (8), ‐COOCH₂CH = CH₂ (9)] were prepared and characterized by elemental analyses, ¹H NMR, ER and UV‐vis spectra. The reaction of complexes (η⁵‐C₅H₄R)CoLI₂ [L= CO, R= ‐COOC(CH₃) = CH₂ (1), ‐COOCH₂C₆H₅(2); L=PPh₃, R=‐COOC (CH₃) = CH₂ (4), ‐COOCH₂C₆H₅ (5)] with Na‐Hg resulted in the formation of their corresponding substituted cobaltocene (η⁵‐C₅H₄R)₂ Co[R=‐COOC(CH₃) = CH₂ (10), ‐COOCH₂C₆H₅ (11)]. The electrochemical properties of these complexes 1–11 were studied by cyclic voltammetry. It was found that as the ligand (L) of the cobalt (III) complexes changing from CO to PPh₃ and P(p‐tolyl)₃, their oxidation potentials increased gradually. The cyclic voltammetry of α,α′‐substituted cobaltocene showed reversible oxidation of one electron process.     

Selenoquinones Stabilized by Ruthenium(II) Arene Complexes: Synthesis,Structure, and Cytotoxicity

A new series of monoselenoquinone and diselenoquinone π complexes, [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Ru(η⁴‐C₆R₄SeE)] (R=H, E=Se ( 6 ); R=CH₃, E=Se ( 7 ); R=H, E=O ( 8 )), as well as selenolate π complexes [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Ru(η⁵‐C₆H₃R₂Se)][SbF₆] (R=H ( 9 ); R=CH₃ ( 10 )), stabilized by arene ruthenium moieties were prepared in good yields through nucleophilic substitution reactions from dichlorinated‐arene and hydroxymonochlorinated‐arene ruthenium complexes [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Ru(C₆R₄XCl)][SbF₆]₂ (R=H, X=Cl ( 1 ); R=CH₃, X=Cl ( 2 ); R=H, X=OH ( 3 )) as well as the monochlorinated π complexes [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Ru(η⁵‐C₆H₃R₂Cl)][SbF₆]₂ (R=H ( 4 ); R=CH₃ ( 5 )). The X‐ray crystallographic structures of two of the compounds, [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Ru(η⁴‐C₆Me₄Se₂)] ( 7 ) and [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Ru(η⁴‐C₆H₄SeO)] ( 8 ), were determined. The structures confirm the identity of the target compounds and ascertain the coordination mode of these unprecedented ruthenium π complexes of selenoquinones. Furthermore, these new compounds display relevant cytotoxic properties towards human ovarian cancer cells.     

Tri­benzyl{η5‐[2‐(p‐tolyl)­prop‐2‐yl]­cyclo­penta­dienyl}­zirconium

The title compound, [Zr(C₇H₇)₃(C₁₅H₁₇)], (I), crystallizes from light petroleum with two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. Whereas in the parent mol­ecule, Zr(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CH₂Ph)₃, all three Zr—CH₂Ph angles are equal, in (I), they differ significantly. In spite of their different environments, both independent mol­ecules in (I) exhibit a small, an expected, and a large Zr—CH₂Ph angle. The angles are similar to those of the closely related tri­benzyl­[η⁵‐(benzyl­di­methyl­silyl)­cyclo­penta­dienyl]­zirconium complex. The smallest Zr—CH₂Ph angle and the consequently relatively short Zr?C_ipso distance are indicative of η²‐bonding of the benzyl group.     

Complexes du titane et du zirconium contenant les ligands cyclopentadienyldiphenylphosphine et cyclopentadienylethyldiphenylphosphine: acces a des structures heterobimetalliques

Reactions of Ph₂P(CH₂)_n(C₅H₄)Li, (n = 0, 2), with MCl₄ or CpTiCl₃ (M = Ti, Zr; Cp = η⁵-C₅H₅) form Cl₂M[(η⁵-C₅H₄)(CH₂)_nPPh₂]₂ or Cl₂CpTi[(η⁵-C₅H₄)-(CH₂)₂PPh₂] in good yields. Chemical reduction with Al, or electrochemical reduction of these complexes, under CO, are described. The titanium(IV) and zirconium(IV) derivatives react with metal carbonyls (Mo(CO)₆, Cr(CO)₆, Fe(CO)₅, Mo(CO)₄(C₈H₁₂)) under formation of new heterobimetallic complexes. Reduction with Al of Cl₂CpTi[(η⁵-C₅H₄)(CH₂)₂PPh₂]Mo(CO)₅ under CO results in a new heterobimetallic species containing low valent titanium. Both complexes Cl₂M[(η⁵-C₅H₄)(CH₂)₂PPh₂]₂ (M = Ti, Zr) react with [Rh(μ-Cl)(CO)(C₂H₄)]₂ to yield {RhCl(CO)(Cl₂M[(η⁵-C₅H₄)(CH₂)₂PPh₂]₂)}x, which is assumed to be a dimer, in which the titanium or the zirconium compounds act as bridging diphosphine ligands between the rhodium atoms.     

Stereoselectivity in Diphos Addition to Molybdenum Complex with Pyridine‐2‐thionate (pyS) and η3‐Methallyl Coordinated Ligands

The conformational isomers endo‐ and exo‐[Mo{η³‐C₃H₄(CH₃)}(η²‐pyS)(CO)(η²‐diphos)] (diphos: dppm = {bis(diphenylphosphino)methane}, 2 ; dppe = {1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane}, 3 ) are prepared by reacting the double‐bridged pyridine‐2‐thionate (pyS) complex [Mo{η³‐C₃H₄(CH₃)}(CO)₂]₂(η¹:η²:μ‐pyS)₂, 1 with diphos in refluxing acetonitrile. Stereoselectivity of the methallyl, C₃H₄(CH₃), ligand improves the formation of the exo‐conformation of 2 and 3 . Orientations and spectroscopy of these complexes are discussed.     

Synthesis and characterization of heterobimetallic mixed-ligand complexes containing Zr(μ-OPri)2Al bridging units

Interesting varieties of heterobimetallic mixed-ligand complexes [Zr{M(OPrⁱ) _n }₂ (L)] (where M = Al, n = 4, L = OC₆H₄CH = NCH₂CH₂O (1); M = Nb, n = 6, L = OC₆H₄CH = NCH₂CH₂O (2); M = Al, n = 4, L = OC₁₀H₆CH = NCH₂CH₂O (3); M = Nb, n = 6, L = OC₁₀H₆CH = NCH₂CH₂O (4)), [Zr{Al(OPrⁱ)₄}₂Cl(OAr)] (where Ar = C₆H₃Me₂-2,5 (5); Ar = C₆H₂Me-4-Bu₂-2,6 (6), [Zr{Al(OPrⁱ)₄}₂(OAr)₂] (where Ar = C₆H₃Me₂-2,5 (7); Ar = C₆H₂Me-4-Bu₂-2,6 (8), [Zr{Al(OPrⁱ)₄}₃(OAr)] (where Ar = C₆H₃Me₂-2,5 (9); Ar = C₆H₃Me₂-2,6 (10), [ZrAl(OPrⁱ)_7-n (ON=CMe₂) _n ] (where n = 4 (11); n = 7 (12), [ZrAl₂(OPrⁱ)_10-n (ON=CMe₂) _n ] (where n = 4 (13); n = 6 (14); n = 10 (15) and [Zr{Al(OPrⁱ)₄}₂{ON=CMe(R)} _n Cl_2–n] [where n = 1, R = Me (16); n = 2, R = Me (17); n = 1, R = Et (18); n = 2, R = Et (19)] have been prepared either by the salt elimination method or by alkoxide-ligand exchange. All of these heterobimetallic complexes have been characterized by elemental analyses, molecular weight measurements, and spectroscopic (I.r., ¹H-, and ²⁷Al- n.m.r.) studies.     

η4‐HBCC‐σ,π‐Borataallyl Complexes of Ruthenium Comprising an Agostic Interaction

Thermolysis of [Cp*Ru(PPh₂(CH₂)PPh₂)BH₂(L₂)] 1 (Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅; L=C₇H₄NS₂), with terminal alkynes led to the formation of η⁴‐σ,π‐borataallyl complexes [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)B{R‐C=CH₂}(L)₂] ( 2 a – c ) and η²‐vinylborane complexes [Cp*Ru(R‐C=CH₂)BH(L)₂] ( 3 a – c ) ( 2 a , 3 a : R=Ph; 2 b , 3 b : R=COOCH₃; 2 c , 3 c : R=p‐CH₃‐C₆H₄; L=C₇H₄NS₂) through hydroboration reaction. Ruthenium and the HBCC unit of the vinylborane moiety in 2 a – c are linked by a unique η⁴‐interaction. Conversions of 1 into 3 a – c proceed through the formation of intermediates 2 a – c . Furthermore, in an attempt to expand the library of these novel complexes, chemistry of σ‐borane complex [Cp*RuCO(μ‐H)BH₂L] 4 (L=C₇H₄NS₂) was investigated with both internal and terminal alkynes. Interestingly, under photolytic conditions, 4 reacts with methyl propiolate to generate the η⁴‐σ,π‐borataallyl complexes [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)BH{R‐C=CH₂}(L)] 5 and [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)BH{HC=CH‐R}(L)] 6 (R=COOCH₃; L=C₇H₄NS₂) by Markovnikov and anti‐Markovnikov hydroboration. In an extension, photolysis of 4 in the presence of dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate yielded η⁴‐σ,π‐borataallyl complex [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)BH{R‐C=CH‐R}(L)] 7 (R=COOCH₃; L=C₇H₄NS₂). An agostic interaction was also found to be present in 2 a – c and 5 – 7 , which is rare among the borataallyl complexes. All the new compounds have been characterized in solution by IR, ¹H, ¹¹B, ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry and the structural types were unequivocally established by crystallographic analysis of 2 b , 3 a – c and 5 – 7 . DFT calculations were performed to evaluate possible bonding and electronic structures of the new compounds.     

Syntheses and Structures of trans-bis(Alkenylacetylide) Ruthenium Complexes

A series of ruthenium alkenylacetylide complexes trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}Cl(dppe)₂] (R=Ph ( 1 a ), ^cC₄H₃S ( 1 b ), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ( 1 c ), 3,3-dimethyl-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b]thiophene (DMBT) ( 1 d )) or trans-[Ru{C≡C-^cC₆H₉}Cl(dppe)₂] ( 1 e ) were allowed to react with the corresponding propargylic alcohol HC≡CC(Me)R(OH) (R=Ph ( A ), ^cC₄H₃S ( B ), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ( C ), DMBT ( D ) or HC≡C-^cC₆H₁₀(OH) ( E ) in the presence of TlBF₄ and DBU to presumably give alkenylacetylide/allenylidene intermediates trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}{C=C=C(Me)}(dppe)₂]PF₆ ([ 2 ]PF₆). These complexes were not isolated but deprotonated to give the isolable bis(alkenylacetylide) complexes trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}₂(dppe)₂] (R=Ph ( 3 a ), ^cC₄H₃S ( 3 b ), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ( 3 c ), DMBT ( 3 d )) and trans-[Ru{C≡C-^cC₆H₉}₂(dppe)₂] ( 3 e ). Analogous reactions of trans-[Ru(CH₃)₂(dmpe)₂], featuring the more electron-donating 1,2-bis(dimethylphosphino)ethane (dmpe) ancillary ligands, with the propargylic alcohols A or C and NH₄PF₆ in methanol allowed isolation of the intermediate mixed alkenylacetylide/allenylidene complexes trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}{C=C=C(Me)}(dmpe)₂]PF₆ (R=Ph ([ 4 a ]PF₆), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ([ 4 c ]PF₆). Deprotonation of [ 4 a ]PF₆ or [ 4 c ]PF₆ gave the symmetric bis(alkenylacetylide) complexes trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}₂(dmpe)₂] (R=Ph ( 5 a ), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ( 5 c )), the first of their kind containing the dmpe ancillary ligand sphere. Attempts to isolate bis(allenylidene) complexes [Ru{C=C=C(Me)R}₂(PP)₂]²⁺ (PP=dppe, dmpe) from treatment of the bis(alkenylacetylide) species 3 or 5 with HBF₄ ⋅ Et₂O were ultimately unsuccessful.     

Methylidene Rare‐Earth‐Metal Complex Mediated Transformations of CN,NN and N?H Bonds: New Routes to Imido Rare‐Earth‐Metal Clusters

Three new patterns of reactivity of rare‐earth metal methylidene complexes have been established and thus have resulted in access to a wide variety of imido rare‐earth metal complexes [L₃Ln₃(μ₂‐Me)₃(μ₃‐Me)(μ ‐ NR)] (L=[PhC(NC₆H₃iPr₂‐2,6)₂]^?; R=Ph, Ln=Y ( 2 a ), Lu ( 2 b ); R=2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃, Ln=Y ( 3 a ), Lu ( 3 b ); R=p‐ClC₆H₄, Ln=Y ( 4 a ), Lu ( 4 b ); R=p‐MeOC₆H₄, Ln=Y ( 5 a ), Lu ( 5 b ); R=Me₂CHCH₂CH₂, Ln=Y ( 6 a ), Lu ( 6 b )) and [{L₃Lu₃(μ₂‐Me)₃(μ₃‐Me)}₂(μ ‐ NR′N)] (R′=(CH₂)₆ ( 7 b ), (C₆H₄)₂ ( 8 b )). Complex 2 b was treated with an excess of CO₂ to give the corresponding carboxylate complex [L₃Lu₃(μ‐η¹:η¹‐O₂CCH₃)₃(μ‐η¹:η²‐O₂C‐CH₃)(μ‐η¹:η¹:η²‐O₂CNPh)] ( 9 b ) easily. Complex 2 a could undergo the selective μ₃‐Me abstraction reaction with phenyl acetylene to give the mixed imido/alkynide complex [L₃Y₃(μ₂‐Me)₃(μ₃‐η¹:η¹:η³‐NPh)(μ₃‐C?CPh)] ( 10 a ) in high yield. Treatment of 2 with one equivalent of thiophenol gave the selective μ₃‐methyl‐abstracted products [L₃Ln₃(μ₂‐Me)₃(μ₃‐η¹:η¹:η³‐NPh)(μ₃‐SPh)] (Ln=Y ( 11 a ); Lu ( 11 b ). All new complexes have been characterized by elemental analysis, NMR spectroscopy, and most of the structures confirmed by X‐ray diffraction.     

Insertion Reactions of Neutral Phosphidozirconocene Complexes as a Convenient Entry into Frustrated Lewis Pair Territory

Neutral phosphidozirconocene complexes [Cp₂Zr(PR₂)Me] (Cp=cyclopentadienyl; 1a : R=cyclohexyl (Cy); 1b : R=mesityl (Mes); 1c : R=tBu) undergo insertion into the Zr?P bond by non‐enolisable carbonyl building blocks (O=CR′R′′), such as benzophenone, aldehydes, paraformaldehyde or CO₂, to give [Cp₂Zr(OCR′R′′PR₂)Me] ( 3 – 7 ). Depending on the steric bulk around P, complexes 3 – 7 react with B(C₆F₅)₃ to give O‐bridged cationic zirconocene dimers that display typical frustrated Lewis pair (FLP)/ambiphilic ligand behaviour. Thus, the reaction of {[Cp₂Zr(μ‐OCHPhPCy₂)][MeB(C₆F₅)₃]}₂ ( 10a ) with chalcone results in 1,4 addition of the Zr⁺/P FLP, whereas the reaction of {[Cp₂Zr(μ‐OCHFcPCy₂)][MeB(C₆F₅)₃]}₂ ( 11a ; Fc=(C₅H₄)CpFe) with [Pd(η³‐C₃H₅)Cl]₂ yields the unique Zr?Fe?Pd trimetallic complex 13a , which has been characterised by XRD analysis.     

Vinyl polymerization of norbornene by mono‐ and trinuclear nickel complexes with indanimine ligands

A series of new indanimine ligands [ArN?CC₂H₃(CH₃)C₆H₂(R)OH] (Ar = Ph, R = Me ( 1 ), R = H ( 2 ), and R = Cl ( 3 ); Ar = 2,6‐i‐Pr₂C₆H₃, R = Me ( 4 ), R = H ( 5 ), and R = Cl ( 6 )) were synthesized and characterized. Reaction of indanimines with Ni(OAc)₂·4H₂O results in the formation of the trinuclear hexa(indaniminato)tri (nickel(II)) complexes Ni₃[ArN = CC₂H₃(CH₃)C₆H₂(R)O]₆ (Ar = Ph, R = Me ( 7 ), R = H ( 8 ), and R = Cl ( 9 )) and the mononuclear bis(indaniminato)nickel (II) complexes Ni[ArN?CC₂H₃(CH₃)C₆H₂(R)O]₂ (Ar = 2,6‐i‐Pr₂C₆H₃, R = Me ( 10 ), R = H ( 11 ), and R = Cl ( 12 )). All nickel complexes were characterized by their IR, NMR spectra, and elemental analyses. In addition, X‐ray structure analyses were performed for complexes 7 , 10 , 11 , and 12 . After being activated with methylaluminoxane (MAO), these nickel(II) complexes can polymerize norbornene to produce addition‐type polynorbornene (PNB) with high molecular weight M_v (10⁶ g mol^?1), highly catalytic activities up to 2.18 × 10⁷ gPNB mol^?1 Ni h^?1. Catalytic activities and the molecular weight of PNB have been investigated for various reaction conditions. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 489–500, 2008     

Darstellung carboxylatsubstituierter Rhenium-Gold-Metallatetrahedrane Re2(AuPPh3)2(μ-PCy2)(CO)7(η1-OC(R)O) (R = H,Me, CF3, Ph, 3,4-(OMe)2C6H3)

Synthesis of Carboxylate Substituted Rhenium Gold Metallatetrahedranes Re₂(AuPPh₃)₂(μ-PCy₂)(CO)₇(η¹-OC(R)O) (R = H, Me, CF₃, Ph, 3,4-(OMe)₂C₆H₃) The reaction of the in situ prepared salt Li[Re₂(μ-H)(μ-PCy₂)(CO)₇(ax-C(Ph)O)] ( 2 ) with 1,5 equivalents of monocarboxylic acid RCOOH (R = H ( 4 a ), Me ( 4 b ), CF₃ ( 4 c ), Ph ( 4 d ), 3,4-(OMe)₂C₆H₃ ( 4 e ) in tetrahydrofruan (THF) solution at 60 °C gives within 4 h under release of benzaldehyde (PhCHO) the η¹-carboxylate substituted dirhenium salt Li[Re₂(μ-H)(μ-PCy₂)(CO)₇(η¹-OC(R)O)] (R = H ( 4 a ), Me ( 4 b ), CF₃ ( 4 c ), Ph ( 4 d ), 3,4-(OMe)₂C₆H₃ ( 4 e )) in almost quantitative yield. The lower the pK_a value of the respective carboxylic acid the faster the reaction proceeds. It was only in the case of CF₃COOH possible to prove the formation of the hydroxycarbene complex Re₂(μ-H)(μ-PCy₂)(CO)₇(=C(Ph)OH) ( 5 ) prior to elimination of PhCHO. The new compounds 4 a–4 e were only characterized by ³¹P NMR and ν(CO) IR spectroscopy as they are only stable in solution. They are converted with two equivalents of BF₄AuPPh₃ at 0 °C in a so-called cluster expansion reaction into the heterometallic metallatetrahedrane complexes Re₂(AuPPh₃)₂(μ-PCy₂)(CO)₇(η¹-OC(R)O) (R = H ( 7 a ), Me ( 7 b ), CF₃ ( 7 c ), Ph ( 7 d ), 3,4-(OMe)₂C₆H₃ ( 7 e )) (yield 47–71% ). The expected precursor complexes of 7 a–7 e Li[Re₂(AuPPh₃)(μ-PCy₂)(CO)₇(η¹-OC(R)O] ( 8 ) were not detected by NMR and IR spectroscopy in the course of the reaction. Their existence was retrosynthetically proved by the reaction of 7 b with an excess of the chelating base TBD (1,5,7-Triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-en) forming [(TBD)_xAuPPh₃][Re₂(AuPPh₃)(μ-PCy₂)(CO)₇(η¹-OC(Me)O] ( 8 b ) in solution. The η¹-bound carboxylate ligand in 7 a–7 e can photochemically be converted into a μ-bound ligand in Re₂(AuPPh₃)₂(μ-PCy₂)(μ-OC(R)O)(CO)₆ (R = H ( 9 a ), Me ( 9 b ), CF₃ ( 9 c ), Ph ( 9 d ), 3.4-(MeO)₂C₆H₃ ( 9 e )) under release of one equivalent CO. All isolated cluster complexes were characterized and identified by the following analytical methods: elementary analysis, NMR (¹H, ³¹P) spectroscopy, ν(CO) IR spectroscopy and in the case of 7 d and 9 b by X-ray structure analysis.     

Catalytic diversity of diene complexes of niobium and tantalum on polymerizations of ethylene,norbornene, and methyl methacrylate

Half‐metallocene diene complexes of niobium and tantalum catalyzed three‐types of polymerization: (1) the living polymerization of ethylene by niobium and tantalum complexes, MCl₂(η⁴‐1,3‐diene)(η⁵‐C₅R₅) ( 1‐4 ; M = Nb, Ta; R = H, Me) combined with an excess of methylaluminoxane; (2) the stereoselective ring opening metathesis polymerization of norbornene by bis(benzyl) tantalum complexes, Ta(CH₂Ph)₂(η⁴‐1,3‐butadiene)(η⁵‐C₅R₅) ( 11 : R = Me; 12 : R = H) and Ta(CH₂Ph)₂(η⁴‐o‐xylylene)(η⁵‐C₅Me₅) ( 16 ); and (3) the polymerization of methyl methacrylate by butadiene‐diazabutadiene complexes of tantalum, Ta(η²‐RN=CHCH=NR)(η⁴‐1,3‐butadiene)(η⁵‐C₅Me₅) ( 25 : R = p‐methoxyphenyl; 26 : R = cyclohexyl) in the presence of an aluminum compound ( 24 ) as an activator of the monomer.     

Microwave assisted synthesis of disubstituted benzyltin arylformylhydrazone complexes: anticancer activity and DNA‐binding properties

Eight disubstituted benzyltin complexes, i.e., {[R(O)C=N‐N=C (Me)COO]R'₂Sn(CH₃OH)}_n ( 1a and 2b ), {[R(O)C=N‐N=C (Me)COO]R'₂Sn(CH₃OH)}₂ ( 1b and 1d ) and {[R(O)C=N‐N=C (Me)COO]R'₂Sn}_n ( 1c , 2a , 2c , and 2d ) (R = C₄H₃O‐, C₄H₃S‐, p–t‐Bu‐C₆H₄‐ or p‐MeO‐C₆H₄‐; R' = o‐Cl‐C₆H₄CH₂‐ or o‐Me‐C₆H₄CH₂‐), were prepared from the reaction of arylformylhydrazine, pyruvic acid and disubstituted benzyltin dichloride with microwave irradiation. All complexes were characterized by FT‐IR spectroscopy, ¹H, ¹³C and ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectroscopy, HRMS, elemental analysis, X‐ray single‐crystal diffraction and TGA. The in vitro antitumour activities of all complexes were evaluated by an MTT assay against three human cancer cell lines (NCI‐H460, HepG2, and MCF7). 2b exhibited strong antitumour activity on HepG2 cells and was expected to be a suitable platform for further chemical optimization to develop as anticancer therapeutics. The DNA binding of 2b was studied by UV–visible absorption spectrometry, fluorescence competitive assays, viscosity measurements and gel electrophoresis. Molecular docking was used to predict the binding between 2b and DNA, and the results show that 2b can become embedded in the double helix of DNA and cleave DNA.     

Group 4 complexes derived from o-carborane: synthesis, structures and ethylene polymerization properties

Nine thermally stable complexes (η⁵-Cp*)[η⁵-(C₅H₄)CMe₂CB₁₀H₁₀CR]MCl₂ (R=H and Me) and (η⁵-Cp*)[η⁵; η¹-(C₅H₄)CMe₂(CB₁₀H₁₀C)]MCl have been prepared via metathesis reactions of Cp*MCl₃ (M=Ti, Zr and Hf, Cp*=pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) with monolithium salts of (C₅H₅)CMe₂(CB₁₀H₁₀CR) (R=H and Me) and with dilithium salt of (C₅H₅)CMe₂(CB₁₀H₁₀CH), respectively. These compounds have been fully characterized by various spectroscopic methods and elemental analyses. All of the compounds except (η⁵-Cp*)[η⁵-(C₅H₄)CMe₂CB₁₀H₁₀CMe]HfCl₂ were additionally characterized by a single crystal X-ray diffraction study, establishing their monomeric bent metallocene structural feature with carborane acting as a substituent or an ancillary ligand. The titanium and zirconium complexes produce high-density polyethylenes with the activity range of about 10³-10⁴ g PE per mol of M bar h in the presence of modified methylaluminoxane cocatalyst.     

Synthesis of Mixed-ring Zirconocene Complexes Containing Alkenyl Group and Ethylene Polymerization Catalyzed with Them

Four new mixed‐ring zirconium completes, [CH₂ = CH(CH₂)_n ‐C₅H₄](RC₅H₄)ZrCl₂ [n = l, R = CH₃OCH₂CH₂(3); n = 2, R = CH₃OCH₂CH₂ (4); n = 2, R=Me₃Si (5); n = 2, R = allyl (6)], have been prepared by the reaction of CH₂ = CH(CH₂)_n C₅H₄ZrCl₃, DME[n = l (1); n = 2 (2)] with RC₅H₄Li. When activated with methylaluminoxane (MAO), the catalytic activities of the above complexes in ethylene polymerization were tested. Complexes 5 and 6 show high activities similar to Cp₂ZrCl₂. Introduction of methoxyethyl group into Cp‐ligand dramatically decreases the catalytic activities of complexes 3 and 4, which can be overcome by increasing the amount of MAO. For complex 5, the dependence of activity and molecular weight (Mη) on the Al/Zr ratio, the polymerization time (t_P), polymerization temperature (T_P) and the polymerization solvent volume (V) was investigated.     

Heteroleptic Complexes of Zirconium Acetylacetonates: Better Precursors for the Preparation of Zirconia. Structural Characterization of [(acac)2Zr{ONC(Me)py‐2}2]

The reactions of the heteroleptic zirconium diisopropoxide bis(acetylacetonate) in benzene solution with two equivalents of oximes, alkoxyalkanols, triphenylsilanol and trimethylsilyl acetate yield products with the formula [{MeC(O)CHC(O)Me}₂ZrL₂] with L = —ONC(Me)C₅H₄N‐2, —ONC(Me)C₄H₃O‐2, —OCH₂CH₂OR (R = Me, Et, Buⁿ; py = pyridine, fu = furan), —OSiPh₃ and —OSiMe₃. Most of these derivatives are solids, but the [(acac)₂Zr(OSiMe₃)₂] is a viscous oil. They could be purified either by recrystallization or by vacuum distillation; all of these are monomeric in boiling benzene. Their elemental analyses, molecular weight measurements and IR as well as NMR spectra were measured. The oximato complex [(acac)₂Zr{ONC(Me)py‐2}₂] has been shown by single crystal X‐ray crystallography to be monoclinic and mononuclear in the solid state, where zirconium has the coordination number 8; all the ligands are situated in cis‐ position and the oximato ligand binds via N and O in a dihapto (η²‐N, O) manner.