Interconversion of acetyl- and terminal-carbonyl groups on labeled (η5-indenyl)(CO)2Fe13C(O)CH3

The ¹³C-labeled (95–99%) acetyl complex (η⁵-In)(CO)₃Fe¹³C(O)CH₃ (8) (In = indenyl) has been prepared by acylating In(CO)₂Fe⁻ Na⁺ (1) with CH₃ ¹³C(O)Cl. All of the starting 1 must be consumed in this reaction (at −78°C), or 45% of the product results as In(CO)(¹³CO)FeC(O)CH₃ (9). Once isolated, neither 8 nor mixtures of 8 and 9 further redistribute or lose this label after pressurizing under 800 atm CO, or after heating in heptane, THF, or acetonitrile solution. Treating 8 with even trace amounts of 1 or of Cp(CO)₂Fe⁻ Na⁺ (5) rapidly interconverts the acetyl and terminal carbonyls, thus transforming 8 into mixtures of 8 and 9. A mechanism is proposed that involves a labile metalla-β-diketonate In(CO)Fe(Fp-CO)(CH₃¹³CO)⁻ Na⁺.     

Synthesis and reactions of dicarbonyl (η2-indene)-η5-indenyl complexes of manganese and rhenium

Photochemical reactions of M(CO)₃(⁵-C₉H₇), where M=Mn (1) or Re (2), with indene have produced ²-indene complexes M(CO)₂(²-C₉H₈)(⁵-C₉H₇), where M=Mn (3) or Re (4). Deprotonation of complex3 witht-BuOK in THF at –60 °C gives the anion [Mn(CO)₂(¹-C₉H₇)(⁵-C₉H₇)^– (5), in which there occurs a rapid interchange of the Mn(CO)₂(⁵-C₉H₇) group between positions 1 and 3 in the ¹-indenyl ligand. The reaction of complex4 with Ph₃CPF₆ in CH₂Cl₂ at 0 °C leads to the complex [Re(CO)₂(³-C₉H₇)(⁵-C₉H₇)PF₆, whereas the similar reaction of complex3 gives only decomposition products even at –20 °C.Translated fromIzvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 7, pp. 1280–1285, July, 1993.     

Synthesis,characterization and crystal structures of heterometallic trinuclear carbonyl sulfido clusters (η5-Cp)MoFeCo- (CO)8(μ3-S) and [(η5-Cp)Mo]2Fe(CO)7(μ3-S)

HFe2Co(CO)9(3-S) reacts with (5-Cp)Mo(CO)3Cl in refluxing THF to give heterometallic trinuclear clusters (5-Cp)MoFeCo(CO)8(3-S) and [(5-Cp)Mo]2Fe(CO)7-(3-S), which have been characterized by elemental analyses, i.r., 1H- and 13C-n.m.r. and X-ray crystal structure determination. An electrophilic addition–elimination sequence is proposed for their formation.     

Self-recognition by the iron chiral auxiliary [(η5-C5H5)Fe(CO)(PPh3] in the formation of (RR,SS)-[(η5-C5H5)FE(CO)(PPh3)COCH2]2CH2

Complete self-recognition of chirality is observed in the Michael addition of the enolate derived from R,S-[η⁵-C₅H₅Fe(CO)(PPh₃-COCH₃] to the acryloyl complex R,S-[(η⁵-C₅H₅Fe(CO)(PPh₃)-COCHCH₂)] to generate exclusively the single diastereoisomer of the glutaroyl complex RR,SS-[(η⁵-C₅H₅)Fe(CO)(PPh₃)COCH₂]₂CH₂.     

Triphospha-Ferrocenes as Ligands. Crystal Structures of [Fe(η5-C5Me5)(η5-C2 TBu2P3)M(CO)5)], (M= Cr,MO, W) and the Novel ruthenium and Nickel Complexes [Fe(η5-C5Me5) (η5-C2 TBu2P3)Ru3(CO)9] and [Fe(η5-C5Me5)(η5-C2 tBu2P3)Ni(Co)2]2

Abstract

Syntheses and structures of penta- and hexaphosphorus analogues of ferrocene have been described recently¹. Unlike their simple ferrocene analogues, these complexes have further ligating potential towards other transition metal centres by virtue of the availability of the ring phosphorus lone-pair electrons that are not involved in the η⁵-coordination. We now describe the first examples of coordination compounds of the triphospha-ferrocene [Fe(η⁵-C₅Me₅) (η⁵-C₂ ^tBu₂P₃]. In the ruthenium complex [Fe(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(η⁵-C₂ ^tBu₂P₃) Ru₃(CO)₉] ² two adjacent phosphorus atoms of the η⁵-C₂ ^tBu₂P₃ ring are interlinked by a ruthenium carbonyl cluster in which all three ruthenium atoms interact with the phosphorus atoms. The tetrametallic nickel complex [Fe(η⁵-C₅Me₅)(η⁵-C₂ ^tBu₂P₃)Ni(CO)₂]₂ ³ represents the first example of intermolecular interlinkage of two phospha-ferrocene systems by two metal centres.     

Phosphine-centred resolution of (η4-diene)Fe(CO)3 complexes: (η4-tropone)Fe(CO)2L and (η4-isoprene)Fe(CO)2L [L = (+)-(neomenthyl)PPh2]

(η⁴-Tropone)Fe(CO)₃ and (η⁴-isoprene)Fe(CO)₃ form separable diastereoisomers on substitution of CO by (+)-(neomenthyl)PPh₂. In the tropone complex, diastereoisomer interconversion occurs by a 1,3-metal shift. The absolute configuration of the isoprene complex has been determined crystallographically.     

Application of electron-transfer chain catalysis: preparation of bridged 〚{(η5-C5H5)Fe(CO)2}2(μ-diphosphine)2+〛 complexes without chelated 〚(η5-C5H5)Fe(CO)(η2-diphosphine)+〛 byproducts

The ligand substitution by diphosphine L–L on (η⁵-C₅H₅)Fe(CO)₂I usually results in the chelated 〚(η⁵-C₅H₅)Fe(CO)(η²-L–L)⁺〛〚I^–〛 product exclusively. One could suppress the chelated complexes and selectively prepare the bridged 〚{(η⁵-C₅H₅)Fe(CO)₂}₂(μ-L–L)²⁺〛 complexes by application of the electron-transfer chain catalysis with a chemical initiation. Introducing a catalytic amount of reductant at low temperature to the mixture of 2:1 (η⁵-C₅H₅)Fe(CO)₂I/L–L in THF selectively produces the bridged complexes in 78–93% isolated yields where L–L is Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂, n = 1–4, or (η⁵-C₅H₄PPh₂)₂Fe.     

New access to (η(5)-cyclohexadienyl)Mn(CO)3 and cationic (η(6)-arene)Mn(CO)3 complexes by Suzuki-Miyaura reaction

First Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reactions applied to (η(5)-chloro-cyclohexadienyl)Mn(CO)3 complexes are described and lead to the syntheses of (η(5)-aryl-cyclohexadienyl)Mn(CO)3 and of cationic (η(6)-arene)Mn(CO)3 complexes after rearomatization. The structures of two of the new complexes have been investigated by X-ray diffraction study.     

Penta- and hexaphospha ferrocenes as ligands: crystal and molecular structures of [Fe(η5-P3C2tBu2)2W(CO)5], [Fe(η5-P3C2tBu2)(η5-P2C3tBu3)W(CO)5] and the novel triruthenium carbonyl cluster complex [Fe(η5-P3C2tBu2)2Ru3(CO)10] containing two interlinked η5-P3C2tBu2 ring systems

The lone-pair electrons of one of the two directly bonded phosphorus atoms of the P₃C₂^tBu₂ ring in the penta- or hexaphosphaferrocene complexes [Fe(η⁵-P₃C₂^tBu₂)(η⁵-P₃C₂^tBu₃)] and [Fe(η⁵P₃ C₂^tBu₂)₂] can ligate to other metal centres to afford novel bi- and tetrametallic complexes, whose structures have been elucidated by NMR and single crystal X-ray crystallographic studies.     

Regiospecific substitution of carbonyl by phosphine ligands in hydrocarbyl-substituted carbonyl clusters. Synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of Fe3(CO)8(PPh3)(μ3-η2- ⊥ -EtC2Et) and (η5-C5H5)NiFe2(CO)5(PPh3)(η3-η2- ⊥-C2But)

The complexes Fe₃(CO)₈(PPh₃)(μ₃-η²- ⊥ -EtC₂Et) and (η⁵-C₅H₅)NiFe₂(CO)₅(PPh₃)(η₃-η²- ⊥-C₂Bu^t) have been obtained by treating Fe₃(CO)₉(C₂Et₂) or (Cp)NiFe₂(CO)₆(C₂Bu^t) with PPh₃ under mild conditions; the substituted clustes have been characterized spectroscopically. Structures are proposed in which the phosphine is on the unique metalatom σ-bonded to the alkyne or acetylide moiety. Replacement of CO by PPh₃ ligands rather than by addition, is observed for the formally unsaturated Fe₃(CO)₉(C₂Et₂). Reorientation of the acetylide was expected for (Cp)NiFe₂(CO)₆(C₂Bu^t) upon substitution, but was not observed.     

Synthesis and crystal structure of [(η3-C3H5)(CO)2Mo(μ-S2CPCy3)-Mo(η3-CH2CMeCH2)(CO)2]

A novel dimolybdenum complex [(³-C₃H₅)(CO)₂Mo(-S₂CPCy₃)Mo(³-CH₂CMeCH₂)(CO)₂], obtained by reacting the [(CO)₂(³-C₃H₅)Mo(-S₂CPCy₃)Mo(CO)₃]^– anion with an excess of ClCH₂CMe=CH₂, has been characterized by i.r., ³¹P{¹H}, ¹H- and ¹³C-n.m.r. spectroscopy and by elemental analysis. The crystal structure of the complex, determined by X-ray diffraction, shows a definite preference for the central carbon of the S₂CPCy₃ bridge to bind to the Mo(2) atom coordinated by ³-2-methylallyl, rather than the Mo(1) atom attached to unsubstituted ³-allyl ligand.     

The reactions of [Fe2(η-Cp)2(CNAr)4] complexes with halogens and tin(II) halides

Summary [Fe₂(-Cp)₂(CNAr)₄] (2) (540-01, C₆H₄Me-2, C₆H₄Et-2, C₆H₃Me₂-2,4, C₆H₃Me₂-2,6, C₆H₃(Me)Et-2,6, C₆H₃Et₂-2,6 or C₆H₃ i-Pr₂-2,6) react with I₂ to give [Fe(-Cp)(CNAr)₂I], but with Br₂[Fe(-Cp) (CNAr)₃]⁺ salts are the only products; IBr gives a mixture of the two. With SnX₂ (X = F, Cl, Br or I) in refluxing n-butanol, (2) gives isolable [{Fe(-Cp)(CNAr)₂}₂SnX₂] only when the CNAr ligands have two ortho substituents, otherwise decomposition occurred. When X = F, [Fe(-Cp) (CNAr)₂SnF₃] was also obtained from this reaction. Attempts to prepare [Fe(-Cp)(CNAr)₂X] (X = Cl or Br) by reaction of (2) with HX in the presence of air gave rather unstable products which with SnX₂ formed [Fe(-C₅H₅)-(CNAr)₂SnX₃]. Similar compounds, [Fe(-Cp) (CNAr)₂ SnX₂I], were obtained from [Fe(-Cp)-(CNAr)₂I] and SnX₂ (X = Cl or Br but not I). All of these complexes are much less stable than their Fe(-Cp)(CO)₂ counterparts; all decompose in solution to [Fe(-Cp)(CNAr)₃]⁺ which then break down to unidentified species. X-ray diffraction studies show that in [Fe(-Cp)(CNC₆H₃-i-Pr₂-2,6)₂I] and [{Fe(-Cp)(CNC₆H₃Me₂-2,6)₂}₂SnBr₂] there is pseudo-octahedral coordination about Fe. In the latter there is also distorted tetrahedral coordination about Sn so that its structure is very similar to that of [{Fe(-Cp)(CO)₂}₂SnCl₂]. Spectroscopic studies show that in all complexes rotation of the aryl rings of the CNAr ligands cannot be slowed in solution, and that there is free rotation about all 540-02 bonds.     

Nature of M-Ga bonds in dihalogallyl complexes (η5-C5H5)(Me3P)2M(GaX2) (M = Fe, Ru, Os) and (η5-C5H5)(OC)2Fe(GaX2) (X = Cl, Br, I): a DFT study

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations have been performed on the terminal dihalogallyl complexes of iron, ruthenium, and osmium (η(5)-C(5)H(5))(Me(3)P)(2)M(GaX(2)) (M = Fe, Ru, Os; X = Cl, Br, I) and (η(5)-C(5)H(5))(OC)(2)Fe(GaX(2)) (X = Cl, Br, I) at the BP86/TZ2P/ZORA level of theory. On the basis of analyses suggested by Pauling, the M-Ga bonds in all of the dihalogallyl complexes are shorter than M-Ga single bonds; moreover, on going from X = Cl to X = I, the optimized M-Ga bond distances are found to increase. From the perspective of covalent bonding, however, π-symmetry contributions are, in all complexes, significantly smaller than the corresponding σ-bonding contribution, representing only 4-10% of the total orbital interaction. Thus, in these GaX(2) complexes, the gallyl ligand behaves predominantly as a σ donor, and the short M-Ga bond lengths can be attributed to high gallium s-orbital character in the M-Ga σ-bonding orbitals. The natural population analysis (NPA) charge distributions indicate that the group 8 metal atom carries a negative charge (from -1.38 to -1.62) and the gallium atom carries a significant positive charge in all cases (from +0.76 to +1.18). Moreover, the contributions of the electrostatic interaction terms (ΔE(elstat)) are significantly larger in all gallyl complexes than the covalent bonding term (ΔE(orb)); thus, the M-Ga bonds have predominantly ionic character (60-72%). The magnitude of the charge separation is greatest for dichlorogallyl complexes (compared to the corresponding GaBr(2) and GaI(2) systems), leading to a larger attractive ΔE(elstat) term and to M-Ga bonds that are stronger and marginally shorter than in the dibromo and diiodo analogues.     

Synthesis and structures of the η5-C5H5Cl(CO)2W-η1,η5-(PPh2)C5H4(CO)2Fe-η1,η5-C5H4Mn(CO)3 and MeSi[C5H4(CO)2Fe-η1,η5-C5H4Mn(CO)2PPh3]3 complexes

The metallation of the η⁵-C₅H₅(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₃ complex with BuⁿLi (THF, ?78 °C) followed by the treatment of the lithium derivative with Ph₂PCl afforded the η⁵-Ph₂PC₅H₄(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₃ complex. The reaction of the latter with η⁵-C₅H₅(CO)₃WCl in the presence of Me₃NO produced the trinuclear complex η⁵-C₅H₅Cl(CO)₂W-η¹,η⁵-(Ph₂P)C₅H₄(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₃. The structure of the latter complex was established by IR, UV, and 1H and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. The reaction of MeSiCl₃ with three equivalents of LiC₅H₄(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₂PPh₃ gave the hexanuclear complex MeSi[C₅H₄(CO)₂Fe-η¹,η⁵-C₅H₄Mn(CO)₂PPh₃]₃.     

Conformational analysis and x-ray crystal structure of [(η5-C5H5)Fe(CO)(PPh3)CH2CH3]

The complex [(η⁵-C₅H₅)Fe(CO)(PPh₃)CH₂CH₃] is shown by ¹H NMR spectroscopy and an X-ray crystal structure analysis to adopt a single conformation with the methyl group residing between the cyclopentadienyl and carbon monoxide ligands.     

Structure and bonding analysis of dimethylgallyl complexes of iron, ruthenium, and osmium [(η5-C5H5)(CO)2M(GaMe2)] and [(η5-C5H5)(Me3P)2M(GaMe2)

Density functional theory calculations have been performed for the dimethylgallyl complexes of iron, ruthenium, and osmium [(η(5)-C(5)H(5))(L)(2)M(GaMe(2)] (M = Fe, Ru, Os; L = CO, PMe(3)) at the DFT/BP86/TZ2P/ZORA level of theory. The calculated geometry of the iron complex [(η(5)-C(5)H(5))(CO)(2)Fe(GaMe(2))] is in excellent agreement with structurally characterized complex [(η(5)-C(5)H(5))(CO)(2)Fe(Ga(t)Bu(2))]. The Pauling bond order of the optimized structures shows that the M-Ga bonds in these complexes are nearly M-Ga single bond. Upon going from M = Fe to M = Os, the calculated M-Ga bond distance increases, while on substitution of the CO ligand by PMe(3), the calculated M-Ga bond distances decrease. The π-bonding component of the total orbital contribution is significantly smaller than that of σ-bonding. Thus, in these complexes the GaX(2) ligand behaves predominantly as a σ-donor. The contributions of the electrostatic interaction terms ΔE(elstat) are significantly smaller in all gallyl complexes than the covalent bonding ΔE(orb) term. The absolute values of the ΔE(Pauli), ΔE(int), and ΔE(elstat) contributions to the M-Ga bonds increases in both sets of complexes via the order Fe < Ru < Os. The Ga-C(CO) and Ga-P bond distances are smaller than the sum of van der Waal radii and, thus, suggest the presence of weak intermolecular Ga-C(CO) and Ga-P interactions.     

Copper(I) as a phosphine abstractor from (η-C5H5)(CO)(PPh3)FeCOCH3

The Cu^I complex Cu(CH₃CN)₄⁺PF₆⁻ chemoselectively abstracts phosphine from Cp(CO)(PPh₃FeCOCH₃ and produces Cp(CO)₂FeCH₃ in good yield. No evidence for electrophilic Cu^I coordinating the acetyl ligand on Cp(CO)(L)FeCOCH₃ (L = CO, PPh₃), however, was obtained Reactions of Cu^I and Cp(CO)(PPh₃)FeCH₃, with and without the presence of CO, also were examined. With CO, this methyl complex first gives its acetyl derivative Cp(CO)(PPh₃)FeCOCH₃ (1 atm CO in CH₂Cl₂ solution, 5 min), and after excess CO is removed (it otherwise blocks further reaction), Cp(CO)₂FeCH₃ forms.