Crystal Structures and Solution Studies of Two Novel Zinc(II) Complexes of a Proton Transfer Compound Obtained from 2, 6‐Pyridinedicarboxylic Acid and 1, 10‐Phenanthroline: Observation of Strong Intermolecular Hydrogen Bonds

The proton transfer compound LH₂ , (phenH⁺)₂(pydc^2—), has been prepared from 1, 10‐phenanthroline, phen, and 2, 6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid, (dipicolinic acid), pydcH₂. Characterization was performed using solution and solid phase CP/MAS ¹³C NMR and IR spectroscopy. The reactions of this adduct with ZnSO₄·7H₂O and Zn(NO₃)₂·4H₂O give the complexes, [Zn(pydc)₂][Zn(phen)₂(H₂O)₂]·7H₂O (1) and [Zn(phen)₃]₄(H(Hpydc)₂)(NO₃)₇·26H₂O (2) , respectively. These complexes were characterized by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X‐ray analysis. The complexes crystallize in the triclinic space group P1 with Z = 2. The unit cell dimensions for complex 1 and 2 are: a = 9.9838(9) Å, b = 14.7483(13) Å, c = 14.8365(13) Å and a = 12.640(4) Å, b = 15.855(5) Å, c = 21.830(7) Å, respectively. In complex 1 (pydc^2—) and phen, are tri‐ and bidentate ligands, respectively, and an anionic [Zn(pydc)₂]^2— and cationic [Zn(phen)₂(H₂O)₂]²⁺ complex are formed simultaneously. In complex 2 , three phen participate in complexation leaving hydrogen‐bis(pyridine‐2‐carboxylate), (H(Hpydc)₂)^— as a supramolecular anion. The fragments (H(Hpydc)₂)^—, 7 NO₃^—, and 26 H₂O in complex 2 are joined together by extensive and strong H‐bonding; therefore, the structure is composed of [Zn(phen)₃]₄⁸⁺, and an anionic hydrogen bond supramolecular assembly with the formula, {(H(Hpydc)₂(NO₃)₇)^8— · 26H₂O}_n. The anionic species (H(Hpydc)₂)^— has a special position at the inversion center, as well as one of the NO₃^— anions, which is disordered over the inversion center. Most of the hydrogen bonds in complex 2 represent strong H‐bonding. The protonation constants of the building blocks of the pydc‐phen adduct, the equilibrium constants for the reaction of (pydc^2—) with phenanthroline and the stoichiometry and stability of the Zn^II complex with LH₂ on aqueous solution were determined by potentiometric pH titration. The solution study results support self‐association between (pydc^2—) and (phenH⁺) with a stoichiometry for the Zn(II) complex similar to that observed for the isolated crystalline complex.     

A Novel Proton Transfer Compound Containing 2, 6‐Pyridinedicarboxylic Acid and Creatinine and its Zinc(II) Complex — Synthesis,Characterization, Crystal Structure,and Solution Studies

The 1:1 proton transfer compound LH₂, (creatH)⁺ (pydcH)^?, has been prepared from the reaction of creatinine, creat, and dipicolinic acid, pydcH₂, (2, 6‐ pyridinedicarboxylic acid) and characterized using IR, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The first coordination complex (creatH)[Zn(pydc)(pydcH)]·4H₂O, was prepared using LH₂ and zinc(II) nitrate, and characterized using IR, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X‐ray crystallography. The crystal system is triclinic with space group with two molecules per unit cell. The unit cell dimensions are a = 8.085(2) Å, b = 10.802(4) Å, c = 13.632(4) Å, α = 104.98(2)°, β = 90.31(2)° and γ = 92.55(3)°. The structure has been refined to a final value for the crystallographic R factor of 0.0381 based on 3003 reflections. The zinc atom is six‐coordinated with a distorted octahedral geometry. The (pydc)^2? and (pydcH)^? units are almost perpendicular to each other. Extensive hydrogen bondings between carboxylate groups, (creatH)⁺ and water molecules throughout the zinc(II) complex as well as π–π stacking and ion pairing play important roles in stabilizing the corresponding lattices. The protonation constants of the building blocks of the pydcH₂‐creat adduct, the equilibrium constants for the reaction of (pydc)^2? with creat and the stoichiometry and stability of the Zn^II complex with LH₂ in aqueous solution were accomplished by potentiometric pH titration. The solution studies support a self‐associated (creatH)⁺(pydcH)^? as the most abundant species at pH = 3.4. The stoichiometry of the crystalline complex (i.e. (creatH) [Zn(pydc)(pydcH)])and that of the most abundant species detected in solution were found the same.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of CeIII and BiIII Complexes and Solution Studies of ZnII,CdII, PbII,CeIII, and BiIII Complexes Obtained from Proton Transfer Compounds Containing 2,6‐Pyridinedicarboxylate Ion

The two complexes (pydaH)₂[Ce(pydc)₂(H₂O)₂]₂ · 2H₂O (1) and (phenH)₂[Bi(pydc)₂(H₂O)]₂ · 5H₂O (2) were prepared from the proton transfer compounds containing the 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylate ion. 1 was synthesized from the reaction of Ce(NO)₃ · 6H₂O with the proton transfer compound, (pydaH₂)(pydc), (pyda=2,6‐diaminopyridine, pydcH₂=2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid). 2 was synthesized from the reaction of proton transfer compound, (phenH)₂(pydc), (phen=1,10‐phenanthroline), with Bi(NO₃)₃ · 5H₂O. The characterization was carried out using IR, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis and single crystal X‐ray diffraction. The complex 1 crystallizes in the space group of the triclinic system, and contains two molecules per unit cell. The structure has been refined to a final value for the crystallographic R factor of 0.0342 based on 8851 reflections. The unit cell parameters are: a = 9.753(2) Å, b = 10.503(2) Å, c = 10.774(2) Å, α = 83.905(4)°, β = 88.089(4)°, and γ = 82.636(3)°. The crystal structure illustrates that cerium atoms are connected together through the four‐membered ring Ce₂O₂. 2,6‐Pyridinedicarboxylate fragment acts as a tridentate ligand. The molecular structure contains four (pydc)^2? ligands, two of which are bridge ligands linking the two central atoms. The complex 2 crystallizes in the space group of the triclinic system and contains two molecules per unit cell. The unit cell dimensions are: a = 8.8860(4) Å, b = 12.0132(6) Å, c = 13.0766(6) Å, α = 100.967(1)°, β = 96.681(1)° and γ = 94.191(1)°. The structure has been refined to a final value for the crystallographic R factor of 0.0471 based on 9576 reflections. In this complex, 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylate moiety has acted as a tridentate ligand and the lattice is composed of binuclear unit, [Bi(pydc)₂(H₂O)]₂^2?, (phenH)⁺ counter ions and five lattice waters. In both complexes hydrogen bonds, π‐π stacking and ion‐pairing play important roles in stabilizing the corresponding lattice. The stoichiometry and stability of the Zn^II, Cd^II, Pb^II, and Ce^III complexes with (pydaH₂)(pydc) in aqueous solution were investigated by potentiometric pH titration. The solution studies revealed that the stoichiometry of the crystalline complexes of the proton transfer system (pydaH₂)(pydc) with Ce^III, obtained in this study, and those with Zn^II, Cd^II and Pb^II, reported in our previous studies, are in close agreements. The complexation reactions of phen, pydc, and 2phen+pydc with Bi^III in aqueous solution were investigated by potentiometric pH titrations, and the equilibrium constants for all major complexes formed are described.     

A Nine‐Coordinated ZrIV Complex and a Self‐Assembling System Obtained from a Proton Transfer Compound Containing 2,6‐Pyridinedicarboxylate and 2,6‐Pyridinediammonium; Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structure

Starting with a zirconium salt and LH₂ , (pydaH₂)²⁺(pydc)^2?, (pyda=2, 6‐pyridinediamine; pydcH₂=2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid), as a 1:1 proton transfer self‐associated compound, two different compounds were resulted. One of them is a new complex of Zr^IV with a flat pyridine containing ligand and structure of (pydaH)₂[Zr(pydc)₃] · 5H₂O (1) and the other, (pydaH)⁺(NO₃)^? (2) is an ion pair with no zirconium ion. The zirconium(IV) complex (1) is crystallized in triclinic system with space group and Z = 2, the crystallographic parameters are: a = 10.612(5) Å, b = 10.617(5) Å, c = 16.815(8) Å, α = 103.654(9)°, β = 95.821(9)°, γ = 98.891(9)° and R‐value for 16767 collected reflections is 0.0592. The ion pair (2) has crystals of monoclinic system with P2₁ space group and Z = 2. Its crystallographic parameters are: a = 3.6227(11) Å, b = 10.034(4) Å, c = 10.296(4) Å, β = 93.422(9)° and R‐value for 4031 collected reflections is 0.0521. The two compounds were characterized with elemental analysis, ESI/MS, NMR and IR spectroscopy.     

A Novel Ruthenium(III) and Lithium Complex: Synthesis,Crystal Structure,and Magnetic Properties

A novel complex [Li₃{μ‐(H₂O)₆}(H₂O)₆]·[RuCl₆] has been synthesized and was characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The compound crystallizes in rhombohedral space group R3¯c, with the unit cell parameters a = b = 9.948(2)Å, c = 33.376(14)Å, γ = 120°, V = 2860.5(15)ų, Z = 6, D_c = 1.918 Mg m^—3, μ = 1.703 mm^—1, R = 0.0244, wR = 0.0478. The compound consists of a cation, which contains three lithium ions linked by six bridged water molecules, and an anion, which contains a ruthenium(III) ion. The whole complex can be described as a three‐dimensional structure linked by hydrogen bonds between cation and anion. The magnetic properties of the complex have been investigated. The IR, UV‐vis and EPR spectra are studied.     

Synthesis,Characterization and X‐ray Crystal Structure of a Chromium(III) Complex Obtained from a Proton‐Transfer Compound Containing 1,10‐Phenanthroline‐2,9‐dicarboxylic Acid and 2,6‐Pyridinediamine

The novel 1,10‐phenanthroline‐2,9‐dicarboxylate containing Chromium(III) complex, (pydaH)[Cr(phendc)₂] · 5H₂O, was synthesized using proton‐transfer compound LH₂, (pydaH₂)²⁺(phendc)^2?, (pyda: 2,6‐pyridinediamine; phendcH₂: 1,10‐phenanthroline‐2,9‐dicarboxylic acid) and thoroughly characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy, X‐ray crystallography and cyclic voltammetry. The complex crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n with four formula units in the unit cell. The unit cell dimensions are: a = 13.962(3) Å, b = 14.529(3) Å, c = 16.381(3) Å and β = 106.691(4)°. In this complex, 1,10‐phenanthroline‐2,9‐dicarboxylate acts as a tridentate ligand and the lattice is composed of anionic hexacoordinated complex, [Cr(phendc)₂]^?, 2,6‐pyridiniumdiamine counter ion, (pydaH)⁺, and five lattice water molecules. Crystallographic characterization revealed that the resulting supramolecular structure is strongly stabilized by complicated network of hydrogen bonds between the crystallization water molecules, counter ion and both coordinated and uncoordinated carboxylate groups. There is no relevant π‐π interaction for this anionic complex between pyda or phendc moieties. The electrochemical studies indicated over potential for both the cathodic and anodic peaks of the complex with respect to the free Cr³⁺ ion, as a consequence of the energy requirement for rearrangement of the ligand at electrode surface.     

The Structure of cis‐[Chloro(dimethylsulfoxide)bis(1, 10‐phenanthroline)ruthenium(II)]‐tetraphenylborate, [RuCl(DMSO)(1, 10‐phen)2][BPh4]

The complex cis‐[RuCl(DMSO)(phen)₂]BPh₄, where DMSO is dimethylsulfoxide and phen is 1, 10‐phenanthroline, crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a = 19.505(4), b = 10.045(2), c = 21.199(4) Å, β = 90.137(4)°, V = 4153(2) ų, Z = 4, D_calc = 1.430 g cm^—3. The ruthenium coordination geometry is that of a slightly distorted octahedron with a cis‐RuN₄ClS arrangement of the ligand donor atoms. The Ru—Cl distance is 2.421(1) Å and the Ru—S distance 2.250(2) Å. The four Ru—N distances are 2.057(6), 2.066(4), 2.073(4), and 2.086(4) Å with the Ru—N bond trans to Cl the second shortest and the Ru—N bond trans to S the longest one.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structure,and Magnetic Properties of {[Cu(phen)]2(C4H2O4)2} · 4.5H2O with C4H4O4 = Maleic Acid

Reaction of CuCl₂ · 2H₂O, phenanthroline, maleic acid and NaOH in CH₃OH/H₂O (1:1 v/v) at pH = 7.0 yielded blue {[Cu(phen)]₂(C₄H₂O₄)₂} · 4.5H₂O, which crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c (no. 15) with cell dimensions: a = 18.127(2)Å, b = 12.482(2)Å, c = 14.602(2)Å, β = 103.43(1)°, U = 3213.5(8)ų, Z = 4. The crystal structure consists of the centrosymmetric dinuclear {[Cu(phen)]₂(C₄H₂O₄)₂} complex molecules and hydrogen bonded H₂O molecules. The Cu atoms are each square‐pyramidally coordinated by two N atoms of one phen ligand and three carboxyl O atoms of two maleato ligands with one carboxyl O atom at the apical position (d(Cu‐N) = 2.008, 2.012Å, equatorial d(Cu‐O) = 1.933, 1.969Å, axial d(Cu‐O) = 2.306Å). Two square‐pyramids are condensed via two apical carboxyl O atoms with a relatively larger Cu···Cu separation of 3.346(1)Å. The dinuclear complex molecules are assembled via the intermolecular π—π stacking interactions into 1D ribbons. Crossover of the resulting ribbons via interribbon π—π stacking interactions forms a 3D network with the tunnels occupied by H₂O molecules. The title complex behaves paramagnetically between 5—300 K, following the Curie‐Weiss law _χm(T—θ) = 0.435 cm³ · mol^—1 · K with θ = 1.59 K.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structure and Properties of [Mn(hdpa)2(N(CN)2)2] and [Co(hdpa)2(N(CN)2)2] (hdpa = 2, 2'‐Dipyridylamine)

Two new transition metal(II) complexes [M(hdpa)₂(N(CN)₂)₂] (M = Mn ( 1 ), Co ( 2 ); hdpa = 2, 2'‐dipyridylamine) have been prepared and characterized structurally and magnetically. Both compounds crystallize in the monoclinic space group C2/c. 1 and 2 are isotypic with the unit cell parameters a = 8.634(9), b = 13.541(14), c = 21.99(2) Å, β = 94.806(18)°, and V = 2562(5) ų for 1 , a = 8.617(3) Å, b = 13.629(5)Å, c = 21.598(8)Å, β = 94.593(6)°, and V = 2528.4(15)ų for 2 , and Z = 4 for both. According to X‐ray crystallographic studies, each metal(II) ion was six‐coordinated with four nitrogen atoms from two bidentate hdpa ligand and two nitrogen atoms from two N(CN)^— anions to form slightly distorted octahedrons. Adjacent complex molecules are connected by hydrogen bonds or π···π interactions to form three‐dimensional network. The IR and UV spectroscopy were measured and the magnetic behaviors were investigated.     

A cocrystal of caffeine and dipicolinic acid: synthesis, characterization, X-ray crystallography, and solution studies

A reaction between caffeine (caff) and dipicolinic acid = 2,6-pyridine dicarboxylic acid (pydc.H₂) in water results in the formation of a cocrystal compound (pydc.H₂.H₂O)(caff) 1. The characterization of the resulting crystallohydrate is performed using ¹H, ¹³C NMR and IR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. X-ray crystal structure analysis reveals the presence of both starting materials and water in the lattice. It also indicates intensive intermolecular H bonding interactions between carboxylic acid, caffeine, and water as well as π-π stacking between the pydc.H₂ and caff rings as constituents of the cocrystal. The hydrogen bonding and non-covalent interactions play roles in the formation of the cocrystal. The crystal system is triclinic with the space group P-1 and two formula units per unit cell. The unit cell parameters are a = 6.906(2) Å, b = 8.451(3) Å, c = 14.68 (4) Å with α = 81.51(3)°, β = 78.47(3)°, and γ = 78.14(3)°. The final R value is 0.0660 for 7943 measured reflections.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Spectroscopic Properties of Copper(II) and Nickel(II) Complexes Containing the 1, 4, 7‐Triisopropyl‐1, 4, 7‐triazacyclononane Ligand

Three new complexes [CuL(N₃)₂] ( 1 ), [CuL(SCN)₂] ( 2 ), and [NiL(SCN)₂] ( 3 ) (L = 1, 4, 7‐triisopropyl‐1, 4, 7‐triazacyclononane, [—NR—C₂H₄—NR—C₂H₄—NR—C₂H₄—], R = i‐Pr) have been synthesized and structurally characterized. The three complexes all crystallize in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n, with the unit cell parameters a = 9.100(5), b = 19.492(11), c = 11.646(6)Å, β = 94.526(9)° for 1 , a = 10.148(3), b = 13.611(5), c = 15.777(6)Å, β = 95.412(6)° for 2 and a = 9.270(7), b = 16.629(14), c = 14.886(12)Å, β = 101.217(15)° for 3 . The central copper(II) and nickel(II) ions are coordinated to five nitrogen atoms, three of which from the L and two from N₃^— or SCN^—, forming a slightly distorted square pyramidal geometry. Moreover, elemental analysis, IR, UV‐vis and ESR spectra of complexes 1 ‐ 3 were also determined.     

Three N2‐benzoyl­oxybenz­amidines: sheet structures built from hard and soft hydrogen bonds and aromatic π–π stacking interactions

Molecules of the title compounds N²‐(benzoyl­oxy)­benz­ami­dine, C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₂, (I), N²‐(2‐hydroxy­benzoyl­oxy)­benz­ami­dine, C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₃, (II), and N²‐benzoyloxy‐2‐hydroxybenzamidine, C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₃, (III), all have extended chain conformations, with the aryl groups remote from one another. In (I), the mol­ecules are linked into chains by a single N—H⋯N hydrogen bond [H⋯N = 2.15 Å, N⋯N = 3.029 (2) Å and N—H⋯N = 153°] and these chains are linked into sheets by means of aromatic π–π stacking interactions. There is one intramolecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bond in (II), and a combination of one three‐centre N—H⋯(N,O) hydrogen bond [H⋯N = 2.46 Å, H⋯O = 2.31 Å, N⋯N = 3.190 (2) Å, N⋯O = 3.146 (2) Å, N—H⋯N = 138° and N—H⋯O = 154°] and one two‐centre C—H⋯O hydrogen bond [H⋯O = 2.46 Å, C⋯O = 3.405 (2) Å and C—H⋯O = 173°] links the mol­ecules into sheets. In (III), an intramolecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bond and two N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds [H⋯O = 2.26 and 2.10 Å, N⋯O = 2.975 (2) and 2.954 (2) Å, and N—H⋯O = 138 and 163°] link the molecules into sheets.     

Molecular and Low‐dimensional Coordination Compounds of Copper(II) and 3, 5‐Dimethylpyrazole — Synthesis,Crystal Structure,and Properties

Three 3, 5‐dimethylpyrazole (pz*) copper(II) complexes, [Cu(pz*)₄(H₂O)](ClO₄)₂ ( 1 ), [Cu(pz*)₂(NCS)₂]·H₂O ( 2 ), and [Cu(pz*)₂(OOCCH=CHCOO)(H₂O)]·1.5H₂O ( 3 ), have been synthesized and characterized with single crystal X‐ray structure analysis. 1 crystallizes in the tetragonal space group, 14/m, with a = 14.027 (3) Å, c = 16.301 (5) Å, and Z = 4. 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group, P2₁/c, with a = 8.008 (3) Å, b = 27.139 (9) Å, c = 8.934 (3) Å, β = 106.345 (6)°, and Z = 4. 3 crystallizes in the triclinic space group, P1¯, with a = 7.291 (9) Å, b = 10.891 (13) Å, c = 11.822 (14) Å, α = 80.90 (2)°, β = 79.73(2)°, γ = 70.60(2)°, and Z = 2. In 1 , one water molecule and four pz* ligands are coordinated to Cu^II. Two [Cu(pz*)₄(H₂O)]²⁺ units are connected to ClO₄^— via hydrogen bonds. One lattice water molecule is found in the unit cell of 2 , which forms an one‐dimensional chain via intermolecular hydrogen bonds with the N‐H atom of pz*. In 3 , the oxygen atom of the coordinated water molecule is connected with two C=O groups of two neighbouring maleic acid molecules to form a linear parallelogram structure. Another C=O group of maleic acid forms a hydrogen bond with the N‐H atom of pz* to create a two‐dimensional structure. The spectroscopic and bond properties are also discussed.     

Konformation und Vernetzung von (CuCN)6‐Ringen in polymeren Cyanocupraten(I) [Cu2(CN)3—] (n = 2, 3)

Conformation and Cross Linking of (CuCN)₆‐Rings in Polymeric Cyanocuprates(I) equation/tex2gif-stack-8.gif [Cu₂(CN)₃^—] (n = 2, 3) The alkaline‐tricyano‐dicuprates(I) Rbequation/tex2gif-stack-9.gif[Cu₂(CN)₃] · H₂O ( 1 ) and Csequation/tex2gif-stack-10.gif[Cu₂(CN)₃] · H₂O ( 2 ) were synthesized by hydrothermal reaction of CuCN and RbCN or CsCN. The dialkylammonium‐tricyano‐dicuprates(I) [NH₂(Me)₂]equation/tex2gif-stack-11.gif[Cu₂(CN)₃] ( 3 ), [NH₂(iPr)₂]equation/tex2gif-stack-12.gif[Cu₂(CN)₃] ( 4 ), [NH₂(Pr)₂]equation/tex2gif-stack-13.gif[Cu₂(CN)₃] ( 5 ) and [NH₂(secBu)₂]equation/tex2gif-stack-14.gif[Cu₂(CN)₃] ( 6 ) were obtained by the reaction of dimethylamine, diisopropylamine, dipropylamine or di‐sec‐butylamine with CuCN and NaCN in the presence of formic acid. The crystal structures of these compounds are built up by (CuCN)₆‐rings with varying conformations, which are connected to layers ( 1 ) or three‐dimensional zeolite type cyanocuprate(I) frameworks, depending on the size and shape of the cations ( 2 to 6 ). Crystal structure data: 1 , monoclinic, P2₁/c, a = 12.021(3)Å, b = 8.396(2)Å, c = 7.483(2)Å, β = 95.853(5)°, V = 751.4(3)ų, Z = 4, d_c = 2.728 gcm^—1, R₁ = 0.036; 2 , orthorhombic, Pbca, a = 8.760(2)Å, b = 6.781(2)Å, c = 27.113(5)Å, V = 1610.5(5)ų, Z = 8, d_c = 2.937 gcm^—1, R₁ = 0.028; 3 , orthorhombic, Pna2₁, a = 13.504(3)Å, b = 7.445(2)Å, c = 8.206(2)Å, V = 825.0(3)ų, Z = 4, d_c = 2.023 gcm^—1, R₁ = 0.022; 4 , orthorhombic, Pbca, a = 12.848(6)Å, b = 13.370(7)Å, c = 13.967(7)Å, V = 2399(2)ų, Z = 8, d_c = 1.702 gcm^—1, R₁ = 0.022; 5 , monoclinic, P2₁/n, a = 8.079(3)Å, b = 14.550(5)Å, c = 11.012(4)Å, β = 99.282(8)°, V = 1277.6(8)ų, Z = 4, d_c = 1.598 gcm^—1, R₁ = 0.039; 6 , monoclinic, P2₁/c, a = 16.215(4)Å, b = 13.977(4)Å, c = 14.176(4)Å, β = 114.555(5)°, V = 2922(2)ų, Z = 8, d_c = 1.525 gcm^—1, R₁ = 0.070.     

meso‐5,5,7,12,12,14‐Hexamethyl‐1,4‐diaza‐8,11‐diazoniacyclotetradecane bis(2‐naphthoate) ethanol disolvate: centrosymmetric five‐component aggregates linked into sheets by C—H⃛π(arene) hydrogen bonding

The title compound is an ethanol‐solvated salt, C₁₆H₃₈N₄²⁺·2C₁₁H₇O₂⁻·2C₂H₆O, in which the cation lies across a centre of inversion in P2₁/c. The ions are linked by N—H⃛O hydrogen bonds [H⃛O = 1.70 and 2.30 Å, N⃛O = 2.624 (2) and 3.136 (2) Å, and N—H⃛O = 178 and 151°], and the ethanol mol­ecule is linked to the anion by an O—H⃛O hydrogen bond [H⃛O = 1.90 Å, O⃛O = 2.728 (2) Å and O—H⃛O = 171°], to form a centrosymmetric five‐component aggregate. C—H⃛O hydrogen bonds and aromatic π–π‐stacking interactions are absent, but the aggregates are linked into sheets by a single C—H⃛π(arene) hydrogen bond.     

Structure and Bonding of the Mixed‐Valent Platinum Trihalides,PtCl3 and PtBr3

The isotypical crystal structures of the mixed valent trihalides PtCl₃ and PtBr₃ were redetermined by single crystal methods (space group R3¯; trigonal setting; PtCl₃: a = 21.213Å, c = 8.600Å, c/a = 0.4054; Z = 36; 1719 hkl; R = 0.035; PtBr₃: a = 22.318Å, c = 9.034Å; c/a = 0.4048; Z = 36; 1606 hkl; R = 0.027). A cubic closest packing of X^— anions forms the basis of an optimized arrangement of cuboctahedrally [Pt₆X₁₂] cluster molecules with Pt^II and enantiomers of helical chains of edge‐condensed [PtX₂X_4/2] octahedra with Pt^IV in cis‐Δ‐ and cis‐Λ‐configuration, respectively. The bond lengths vary with the function of the X^— ligands (d¯(Pt^II—X) = 2.315 and 2.445Å; d¯(Pt^II—Pt^II) = 3.336 and 3.492Å; d(Pt^IV—X) = 2.286 — 2.417Å and 2.437 — 2.563Å). The Pt^II atoms are shifted outwards the X₁₂ cuboctahedra by 0.045Å and 0.024Å, respectively. The symmetry governed Periodic Nodal Surface, PNS, perfectly separates the regions of different valencies. Quantum chemical calculations exclude the possible additional interactions between Pt^II and one of the exo‐ligands of Pt^IV.     

Mg2[BN2]Cl and Mg8[BN2]5I: Novel Magnesium Nitridoborate Halides — Syntheses,Crystal Structures,and Vibrational Spectra

The title compounds have been synthesized at 1473 K from stoichiometric mixtures of the binary components Mg₃N₂, MgX₂ (X = Cl, I) and BN in arc‐welded steel ampoules encapsulated in evacuated silica tubes. Mg₂[BN₂]Cl ( 1 ) and Mg₈[BN₂]₅I ( 2 ) crystallize in the orthorhombic space groups Pbca (no. 61) and Imma (no. 74), respectively, with a = 6.6139(8)Å, b = 9.766(1)Å, c = 10.600(1)Å, Z = 8 for 1 and a = 13.535(3)Å, b = 9.350(2)Å, c = 11.194(2)Å, Z = 4 for 2 . The crystal structures are characterized mainly by Mg₆ trigonal prisms which are condensed to 3D frameworks in different ways. Part of the trigonal prisms are centered by the [N—B—N]^3— anions and other voids in the framework by the X^— anions. The magnesium environment around Cl^— is a very distorted monocapped trigonal prism (CN = 6+1) and that of I^— is a bicapped heptagonal prism (CN = 14+2). The bond lengths and bond angles for the relevant [BN₂]^3— anions are d(B—N) = 1.330 — 1.338Å, ∠N—B—N = 175.8° in 1 and d(B—N) = 1.330 — 1.339Å, ∠N—B—N = 176.8° — 178.0° in 2 . The vibrational spectra of the title compounds have been recorded and interpreted based on the D_∞h symmetry of the relevant [N—B—N]^3— groups considering the site symmetry splitting.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structures,and Magnetic Properties of Three New Iron Complexes Derived from 3,5‐Bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole

Two new iron(III) complexes and one iron(II) complex have been synthesized from the solvothermal reactions of FeCl₃·6H₂O with 3,5‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole (Hbpt) in methanol or acetonitrile. KSCN acted as the reducing agent in the synthesis of iron(II) complex of 3 . [FeCl₃(Hbpt)(H₂O)]·H₂O ( 1 ) crystallizes in the triclinic space group with a = 7.475(1), b = 9.468(2), c = 12.309(2) Å, α = 73.880(2), β = 74.746(2), γ = 81.849(2)°, V = 805.2(2) ų, Z = 2. [Fe₂(bpt)₂Cl₄] ( 2 ): orthorhombic space group Pnnm with a = 9.895(2), b = 10.632(2), c = 13.195(2) Å, V = 1388.1(4) ų, Z = 2. [Fe₂(bpt)₂(MeOH)₂Cl₂] ( 3 ): orthorhombic space group Pbca with a = 14.4204(16), b = 9.8737(11), c = 19.792(2) Å, V = 2818.1(5) ų, Z = 4. 1 features the first structurally characterized metal complex of the neutral Hbpt ligand in which the Hbpt ligand adopts an unprecedented zwitterionic form. 2 shows a neutral dinuclear iron(III) complex and the [Fe₂(bpt)₂]⁴⁺ unit is ideally planar. The two iron(III) ions separated by a distance of 4.408(2) Å are doubly triazolate‐bridged. Each dimeric unit is connected with six other dimeric ones via the bifurcated C‐H···Cl hydrogen bonds, these connections extend the dimeric moieties into a three‐dimensional molecular architecture. 3 is a neutral centrosymmetric dinuclear Fe^II complex, in which intermolecular moderate O‐H···N hydrogen bonding interactions between the methanol molecules and 4‐position nitrogen atoms of the triazolato groups extend the dinuclear species into a two‐dimensional supramolecular architecture of (4,4) topology. Magnetic studies indicate there exists an antiferromagnetic spin coupling in Fe^III₂ and Fe^II₂ units via the double triazolate bridges in 2 and 3 .     

Chromium(III) and Calcium(II) complexes obtained from dipicolinic acid: Synthesis, characterization, X-Ray crystal structure and solution studies

The Cr(III) and Ca(II) complexes (dmpH)[Cr(pydc)₂]?H₂O (1) and [Ca₂(pydc)₂(H₂O)₆].2pydcH₂ (2) were synthesized by reaction of 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline (dmp) and pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (pydcH₂) with Cr(NO₃)₃ and Ca(NO₃)₂, respectively, and characterized using IR spectroscopy, single crystal X-ray diffraction method and solution studies. The space group and crystal system of these two compounds are P2 ₁/c and monoclinic. The crystal dimensions are a = 9.785(3) Å, b = 25.671(4) Å, c = 9.3402(16) Å, β = 90.790(17)° for (1) and a = 9.1319(4) Å, b = 14.8430(8) Å, c = 12.2449(7) Å, β = 98.227(5)° for (2). In complex (1), a water molecule presents in the crystal packing, linking the anionic and cationic fragments together by hydrogen bonding and thus increases the stabilization of crystal lattices. In complex (2), the coordinated water molecules relate each dimer to adjacent dimers forming infinite molecular ribbons by strong hydrogen bondings. Hydrogen bonding and ion pairing play an important role in stabilizing these crystals. The complexation reactions of pydc, dmp and pydc+dmp with Cr³⁺ and Ca²⁺ ions in aqueous solution were investigated by potentiometric pH titrations and the equilibrium constants for all major complexes formed were evaluated.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structure,and Characterization of three New Letrozole Complexes

Three new letrozole complexes {[Cu(Le)₄Cl₂] · (H₂O)} ( 1 ), {[Ni(Le)₄Cl₂] · (H₂O)}( 2 ) and {[Co(Le)₄Cl₂] · (H₂O)} ( 3 ) (Le = letrozole = 1‐[bis(4‐cyanophenyl)methyl]‐1, 2, 4‐triazole) were obtained from self‐assembly of CuCl₂, NiCl₂ · 6H₂O, and CoCl₂ · 6H₂O with medicine letrozole. All compounds were characterized by IR spectroscopy, elemental, single‐crystal as well as powder X‐ray diffraction, and thermogravimetric analyses. The analyses of the structures indicate that all crystals belong to monoclinic system, space group C2/c, for complex 1 with crystal data a = 34.501(18) Å, b = 12.724(7) Å, c = 16.116(9) Å, β = 114.958(7) °, V = 6414(6) Å ³, Z = 4, F(000) = 2660, R₁ = 0.0668, wR₂ = 0.1574; for complex 2 , a = 34.769(6) Å, b = 12.7267(18) Å, c = 16.046(2) Å, β = 115.281(3) °, V = 6420.1(16) Å ³, Z = 4, F(000) = 2656, R₁ = 0.0510, wR₂ = 0.0896; for complex 3 , a = 35.063(8) Å,b = 12.658(3) Å, c = 16.056(4) Å, β = 115.387(3) °, V = 6438(2) ų, Z = 4, F(000) = 2652, R₁ = 0.0528, wR₂ = 0.1205. The local arrangements around central metal atoms (Cu^II, Ni^II, and Co^II) can be best described as distorted octahedra which are constructed by two chlorine atoms and four monodentate nitrogen atoms from different letrozole ligands. XRD results of 1 – 3 show that all peaks displayed in the measured patterns at room temperature closely match those in the simulated patterns generated from single‐crystal diffraction data, indicating single phases of 1 – 3 were formed.