Hydrogallierungsreaktionen mit den Monoalkinen H5C6‐C≡C‐SiMe3 und H5C6‐C≡C‐CMe3 – cis/trans‐Isomerie und Substituentenaustausch

Hydrogallation Reactions Involving the Monoalkynes H₅C₆‐C≡C‐SiMe₃ and H₅C₆‐C≡C‐CMe₃ – cis/trans Isomerisation and Substituent Exchange Phenyl‐trimethylsilylethyne, H₅C₆‐C≡C‐SiMe₃, reacted with different dialkylgallium hydrides, R₂Ga‐H (R = Me, Et, nPr, iPr, tBu), by the addition of one Ga‐H bond to its C≡C triple bond (hydrogallation). The gallium atoms attacked selectively those carbon atoms, which were also attached to trimethylsilyl groups. The cis arrangement of Ga and H across the resulting C=C double bonds resulted only for the sterically most shielded di(tert‐butyl)gallium derivative, while in all other cases spontaneous cis/trans rearrangement occurred with the quantitative formation of the trans addition products. The diethyl compound Et₂Ga‐C(SiMe₃)=C(H)‐C₆H₅ ( 2 ) gave by substituent exchange the secondary products EtGa[C(SiMe₃)=C(H)‐C₆H₅]₂ ( 7 , Z,Z) and Ga[C(SiMe₃)=C(H)‐C₆H₅]₃ ( 8 ). Interestingly, compound 8 has two alkenyl groups with a Z configuration, while the third C=C double bond has the cis arrangement of Ga and H (E configuration). The reversibility of the cis/trans isomerisation of hydrogallation products was observed for the first time. tert‐Butyl‐phenylethyne gave the simple addition product, R₂Ga(C₆H₅)=C(H)‐CMe₃ ( 9 ), only with di(n‐propyl)gallium hydride.     

A Symmetrically Bridging Triarylsilyl Ligand in a Dinuclear Rhodium Complex: Synthesis and Structure of [LRh(H)(µ-Cl)(µ-SiAr2)(µ-SiAr3)Rh(H)L] (Ar=Ph,p-FC6H4; L=PiPr3)

Simply warming solutions of the dinuclear complexes 1 provides novel complexes 2 [Eq. (a); Ar = Ph, p-FC₆H₄; L = PiPr₃], which contain a bridging triarylsilyl ligand and show unusual thermal stability. Compounds with this type of symmetric structure are of interest as models of the transition state for the migration of tertiary silyl groups in a bimetallic framework.     

Die Kristallstrukturen von (DDI)2[Sb2F6O] und (DDI)2[Sb3F7O2] (DDI = 1, 3‐Diisopropyl‐4, 5‐dimethylimidazolium) — Ein Beitrag zur Hydrolyse von SbF3 [1]

The Crystal Structures of (DDI)₂[Sb₂F₆O] and (DDI)₂[Sb₃F₇O₂] (DDI = 1,3‐Diisopropyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazolium) — a Contribution to the Hydrolysis of SbF₃ [1] The salts (DDI)₂[Sb₂F₆O] ( 2 ) and (DDI)₂[Sb₃F₇O₂] ( 3 ), (DDI = 1,3‐diisopropyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazolium) are obtained by hydrolysis of C₁₁H₂₀N₂SbF₃ ( 1 ). The anion [Sb₂F₆O]^2? consists of two SbF₂ fragments linked by a symmetrical oxygen bridge and two unsymmetrical fluorine bridges to form a distored ψ‐octahedral coordination sphere at the antimony atoms. In [Sb₃F₇O₂]^2?, two SbF₂ units are linked by a symmetrical fluorine bridge, while the third antimony atom is connected with each SbF₂ fragment by a symmetrical oxygen and an unsymmetrical fluorine bridge. The antimony atoms adopt the centres of strongly distored ψ‐polyhedra.     

Replacement of Trimethylamine in Trimethylamine‐trispentafluoroethyl‐borane. Structures of [(C2F5)3BNMe3], [NMe4][(C2F5)3BOH], and K[(C2F5)3BCH2(CO)C6H5]

Trimethylamine‐tris(pentafluoroethyl)borane [(C₂F₅)₃BNMe₃] ( 1 ) reacts at 190 °C with water under displacement of the trimethylamine ligand to yield the hydroxy‐tris(pentafluoroethyl)borate [(C₂F₅)₃BOH]^? ( 2 ). In tributylamine 1 reacts with alkynes HC≡CR to form novel ethynyl‐tris(pentafluoroethyl)borate anions [(C₂F₅)₃BC≡CR]^? – R = C₆H₅ ( 3 ), C₆H₄CH₃ ( 4 ), Si(CH(CH₃)₂)₃ ( 5 ) – in moderate yields. Compound 3 adds water across the triple bond to form the novel anion [(C₂F₅)₃BCH₂(CO)C₆H₅]^? ( 6 ). The structures of [(C₂F₅)₃BNMe₃], [NMe₄][(C₂F₅)₃BOH] and K[(C₂F₅)₃BCH₂(CO)C₆H₅] have been determined by x‐ray crystallography.     

Heteroleptic [n]Chromoarenophanes: ansa Complexes Derived from [Cr(η5‐C5H5)(η6‐C6H6)]

The synthesis of ansa complexes has been studied intensively owing to their importance as homogeneous catalysts and as precursors of metal‐containing polymers. However, paramagnetic non‐metallocene derivatives are rare and have been limited to examples with vanadium and titanium. Herein, we report an efficient procedure for the selective dilithiation of paramagnetic sandwich complex [Cr(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(η⁶‐C₆H₆)], which allows the preparation of a series of [n]chromoarenophanes (n=1, 2, 3) that feature silicon, germanium, and tin atoms at the bridging positions. The electronic and structural properties of these complexes were probed by X‐ray diffraction analysis, cyclic voltammetry, and by UV/Vis and EPR spectroscopy. The spectroscopic parameters for the strained and less strained complexes (i.e., with multiple‐atom linkers) indicate that the unpaired electron resides primarily in a d orbital on chromium(I); this result was also supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. We did not observe a correlation between the experimental UV/Vis and EPR data and the degree of molecular distortion in these ansa complexes. The treatment of tin‐bridged complex [Cr(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SntBu₂] with [Pt(PEt₃)₃] results in the non‐regioselective insertion of the low‐valent Pt⁰ fragment into the C_ipso? Sn bonds in both the five‐ and six‐membered rings, thereby furnishing a bimetallic complex. This observed reactivity suggests that ansa complexes of this type are promising starting materials for the synthesis of bimetallic complexes in general and also underline their potential to undergo ring‐opening processes to yield new metal‐containing polymers.     

Neutron Diffraction Study of [Nd(AlMe4)3]⋅0.5 Al2Me6 at 100 K: The First Detailed Look at a Bridging Methyl Group with a Trigonal-Bipyramidal Carbon Atom

Weak agostic Nd⋅⋅⋅H interactions and Nd−C bonds are involved in the bonding of the bridging methyl groups in the title compound (see sketch on the right): Two of the three H atoms of the methyl group are directed at the Nd center. The C atoms have distorted trigonal-bipyramidal geometry with the Nd atom and one of the H atoms (H_A) as axial ligands, and the Al atom and the other two H atoms (H_B and H_C) in equatorial positions. The Al₂Me₆ “solvate” molecule is disordered.     

Air‐Stable {(C5H5)Co} Catalysts for [2+2+2] Cycloadditions

Cobalt cyclopentadienyl complexes incorporating a fumarate and a CO ligand (see picture) efficiently catalyze inter‐ and intramolecular [2+2+2] cycloadditions of alkynes, nitriles, and/or alkenes to give benzenes, pyridines, or 1,3‐cyclohexadienes. Unlike catalysts such as [CpCo(CO)₂] or [CpCo(C₂H₄)₂] (Cp=C₅H₅), they are air‐stable, easy to handle, compatible with microwave conditions, and do not necessarily require irradiation to be active.

     

[B(O–C6H4–CN)4]– based Silver and Copper Coordination Polymers

A series of new coordination polymers bearing the [B(O–C₆H₄–CN)₄]^– anion was synthesized. Two new, one dimensional coordination frameworks of the type M[B(O–C₆H₄–CN)₄] (M = Ag, Cu) were obtained by salt metathesis. The reactivity towards organic Lewis‐bases was studied. The reaction with bidentate ligands yielded two dimensional networks with the general formula [M(L)][B(O–C₆H₄–CN)₄] {L = 2,2′‐bipyridine, 4,4′‐bipyridine, 1,2‐bis(pyridyl)ethane, 1,4‐diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane}. The synthesis, properties and single crystal structure are reported.     

[{(C7H13N2)AlCl}2O]: Ein zweikerniger Vinamidin‐Komplex des Aluminiums mit linearer Sauerstoffbrücke [1]

[{(C₇H₁₃N₂)AlCl}₂O]: A Dinuclear Vinamidine Aluminum Complex with a Linear Oxygen Bridge [1] [(C₇H₁₃N₂)AlCl₂] ( 1 ) reacts with Ag₂O in the ratio 2/1 to give the dinuclear vinamidine complex [{(C₇H₁₃N₂)AlCl}₂O] ( 2 ) in good yield. The crystal structure investigation of 2 reveals the presence of a linear fragment Al—O—Al in the centrosymmetric space group P2₁/c.     

Terminale und verbrückende Koordination von Indium‐Indium‐Bindungen – bemerkenswerte Polymorphie an der Verbindung In2R2[(OCC6H5)2CH]2 [R = C(SiMe3)3]

Terminal and Bridging Coordination of Indium‐Indium Bonds – Remarkable Polymorphism with the Compound In₂R₂[(OCC₆H₅)₂CH]₂ [R = C(SiMe₃)₃] Treatment of the dimeric indium(II) subhalide (In₂R₂Cl₂)₂ ( 1 ) [R = C(SiMe₃)₃] with four equivalents of lithium dipivaloylmethanide or lithium dibenzoylmethanide afforded by the release of lithium chloride the corresponding diindium diacetylacetonates ( 2 and 3 ). The In‐In single bonds of the products were terminally coordinated by chelating acectylacetonato ligands and the bulky alkyl groups. Three different crystal structures were determined for the dibenzoylmethanide derivative 3 which in the solid state adopted trans and gauche conformations across the In‐In bonds. In contrast to the terminally arranged acetylacetonato ligands of compounds 2 and 3 alkylbenzoato ligands R‐COO^? (3,5‐dimethylbenzoate and p‐tert‐butylbenzoate) gave the bridging coordination of the In‐In bonds by two chelating carboxylato groups ( 4 and 5 ). This particular coordination caused a strong shortening of the In‐In bond length in 4 compared to the unsupported bonds in 2 and 3 (264.6 versus 274.7 to 279.3 pm).     

μ‐Rhodizonato‐1κO,1:2κO′,2κO′′‐tetra(triphenylphosphine)disilver(I): A Molecular Complex with the [C6O6]2– Ligand Template

The first silver rhodizonate and overall fourth transition metal rhodizonate complex is presented. The title compound shows a so far unobserved coordination mode of the rhodizonate ligand, which is atypically distorted from planarity. The structure discussion is accompanied by a thorough literature review of the hitherto structurally characterized rhodizonate salts and complexes.     

Studien zur Reaktion von [Me2AlP(SiMe3)2]2 mit basenstabilisierten Organogalliumchloriden und ‐hydriden

Investigations on the Reactivity of [Me₂AlP(SiMe₃)₂]₂ with Base‐stabilized Organogalliumhalides and ‐hydrides [Me₂AlP(SiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 1 ) reacts with dmap?Ga(Cl)Me₂, dmap?Ga(Me)Cl₂, dmap?GaCl₃ and dmap?Ga(H)Me₂ with Al‐P bond cleavage and subsequent formation of heterocyclic [Me₂GaP(SiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 2 ) as well as dmap?AlMe_xCl_3?x (x = 3 8 ; 2 3 ; 1 4 ; 0 5 ). The reaction between equimolar amounts of dmap?Al(Me₂)P(SiMe₃)₂ and dmap?Ga(t‐Bu₂)Cl yield dmap?Ga(t‐Bu₂)P(SiMe₃)₂ ( 6 ) and dmap?AlMe₂Cl ( 3 ). 2 – 8 were characterized by NMR spectroscopy, 2 and 6 also by single crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Alkaline Earth Diazapentadienyl Compounds: Structure of [Ba2{(C6H11)NC(Me)CHC(Me)N(C6H11)}3{(SiMe3)2N}]

Three different bonding modes in one molecule! The diazapentadienyl ligands in the title compound 1 adopt η¹,η¹-N,N-chelating plus η⁵-terminal, η¹η¹-N,N chelating plus η⁵-bridging, and novel η¹-N plus η³-1-aza-allyl bonding modes. R=cyclohexyl.     

Molekül‐ und Kristallstruktur von Bis[chloro(μ‐phenylimido)(η5‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)tantal(IV)](Ta–Ta), [{TaCl(μ‐NPh)Cp*}2]

Molecular and Crystal Structure of Bis[chloro(μ‐phenylimido)(η⁵‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)tantalum(IV)](Ta–Ta), [{TaCl(μ‐NPh)Cp*}₂] Despite the steric hindrance of the central atom in [TaCl₂(NPh)Cp*] (Ph = C₆H₅, Cp* = η⁵‐C₅(CH₃)₅), caused by the Cp* ligand, the imido‐ligand takes a change in bond structure when this educt is reduced to the binuclear complex [{TaCl(μ‐NPh)Cp*}₂] in which tantalum is stabilized in the unusual oxidation state +4.     

[(C7H13N2)2Al]BPh4 – ein spirozyklischer Vinamidin‐Komplex des Aluminiums

[(C₇H₁₃N₂)₂Al]BPh₄ – a Spirocyclic Vinamidine Complex of Aluminum (C₇H₁₃N₂)AlH₂ ( 3 ) reacts with the vinamidinium salts C₇H₁₄N₂ · HX [ 4 , X = BPh₄ ( a ), Cl ( b )] to give the spirocyclic vinamidine aluminum complexes [(C₇H₁₃N₂)₂Al]BPh₄ ( 5 a ) and (C₇H₁₃N₂)₂AlCl ( 5 b ); the crystal structure of 5 a is reported.     

Umsetzungen der Dielementverbindungen R2E–ER2 [E = Ga,In; R = CH(SiMe3)2] mit Lithium‐phenylethinid – Bildung von Addukten unter Erhalt der E–E‐Bindungen

Reactions of the Dielement Compounds R₂E–ER₂ [E = Ga, In; R = CH(SiMe₃)₂] with Lithium Phenylethynide – Formation of Adducts by Retention of the E–E Bonds Lithium phenylethynide reacted with the dielement compounds tetrakis[bis(trimethylsilyl)methyl]digallane(4) ( 2 ) and diindane(4) ( 3 ) as a Lewis‐base and gave by the addition of one ethynido ligand to one of the Lewis‐acidic central atoms the anionic adducts 4 and 5 with intact Ga–Ga and In–In single bonds. Thus, compounds were formed, in which tricoordinated, coordinatively unsaturated Ga or In atoms are neighbored to tetracoordinated, coordinatively saturated ones. The E–E bonds [255.83 pm in 4 (Ga–Ga) and 285.24 pm in 5 (In–In)] are only slightly lengthened compared to those of the starting compounds 2 and 3 . A dynamic behavior with a fast change of the position of the ethynido ligand was observed for both compounds in solution at room temperature.     

A Ruthenium Bridge in Fullerene–Ferrocene Arrays: Synthesis of [Ru(C60Me5)R(CO)2] (R=C6H4Fc,C≡CFc) and Their Charge‐Transfer Properties

New fullerene–ferrocene arrays, [Ru(C₆₀Me₅)(C₄H₆Fc)(CO)₂] (Fc=ferrocenyl) and [Ru(C₆₀Me₅)(CCFc)(CO)₂], in which the ruthenium complex functions as a conjugative bridge, were synthesized by the reaction of [Ru(C₆₀Me₅)Cl(CO)₂] with FcC₆H₄MgBr and FcCCLi, respectively. These compounds were investigated by electrochemical measurement, single‐crystal X‐ray structural analysis, and photophysical measurement. Upon photoirradiation, the former compound was converted rapidly into the corresponding triplet state in toluene (τ_singlet=21 ps), whereas the charge‐separated state was predominant in THF (τ_singlet=10.5 ps; τ_CS=355 ps). The latter compound, on the other hand, formed the charge‐separated state in both toluene and THF (τ_singlet=3.0 ps; τ_CS=152 ps). Thus, the structural difference between the phenylene and acetylene bridges in 1 and 2 , respectively, was found to change the outcome of the photophysical processes.     

Das Hexagallan [Ga6{SiMe(SiMe3)2}6] und das closo‐Hexagallanat [Ga6{Si(CMe3)3}4(CH2C6H5)2]2— — der Übergang zu einem ungewöhnlichen precloso‐Cluster

The Hexagallane [Ga₆{SiMe(SiMe₃)₂}₆] and the closo‐Hexagallanate [Ga₆{Si(CMe₃)₃}₄ (CH₂C₆H₅)₂]^2— — the Transition to an Unusual precloso‐Cluster The closo hexagallanate [Ga₆R₄(CH₂Ph)₂]^2— (R = Si^tBu₃) as well as the hexagallane Ga₆R₆ (R = SiMe(SiMe₃)₂) with only six cluster electron pairs were isolated from reactions of “GaI” with the corresponding silanides. The structure of the latter is derived from an octahedron by a Jahn‐Teller‐distortion and is different from the capped trigonal bipyramidal one expected by the Wade‐Mingos rules. Both compounds were characterized by X‐ray crystallography. The bonding is discussed with simplified Ga₆H₆ and Ga₆H₆^2— models via DFT methods.