Harmonisation of proficiency testing schemes

The harmonisation of proficiency testing (PT) schemes has been under debate for a long time. There are obvious reasons why harmonisation of the practices in PT would be beneficial. In many areas, there is still a belief that further harmonisation of practices in PT would improve the comparability of measurement data. In particular when two laboratories are to be compared that have not participated in a single PT, problems arise which allegedly can be overcome by further harmonisation of PT schemes. In practice, however, parties involved in PT are not always embracing the idea of harmonisation. With the results of two European projects in mind, a discussion is given on harmonisation aspects, and some considerations are given that may help to decide in practice whether harmonisation is likely to solve particular problems. The first project, the European Proficiency Testing Network (EPTN), is concerned with further harmonisation. The second European project (COEPT) aims at providing a basis to assess equivalence across proficiency tests, and explores the conditions under which such an assessment is feasible.     

Harmonisation of proficiency testing schemes

The harmonisation of proficiency testing (PT) schemes has been under debate for a long time. There are obvious reasons why harmonisation of the practices in PT would be beneficial. In many areas, there is still a belief that further harmonisation of practices in PT would improve the comparability of measurement data. In particular when two laboratories are to be compared that have not participated in a single PT, problems arise which allegedly can be overcome by further harmonisation of PT schemes. In practice, however, parties involved in PT are not always embracing the idea of harmonisation. With the results of two European projects in mind, a discussion is given on harmonisation aspects, and some considerations are given that may help to decide in practice whether harmonisation is likely to solve particular problems. The first project, the European Proficiency Testing Network (EPTN), is concerned with further harmonisation. The second European project (COEPT) aims at providing a basis to assess equivalence across proficiency tests, and explores the conditions under which such an assessment is feasible.

     

Surveys on the accreditation of providers of proficiency testing and external quality assessment schemes

Two surveys among providers of proficiency testing (PT) and external quality assessment (EQA) schemes were carried out during 2004 and 2005. The main objectives were to explore the current status of accreditation/certification and collect the providers’ views. Information based on the response from 160 providers in 32 countries reveals a strong tendency towards accreditation of PT/EQA. It is shown that this type of accreditation is based on several combinations of normative documents, hence illustrating a lack of harmonisation of national accreditation bodies. The surveys also show that schemes are operated under considerably different conditions and that providers’ competence may or may not be underpinned by other certification and/or accreditation. This paper elaborates on a number of issues related to PT/EQA accreditation, including customers’ views, normative documents, providers’ experience from the accreditation process, views expressed by international organisations, and effects of accreditation on participation fees, quality and availability.     

Microbiology proficiency testing schemes in wine

Accreditation and Quality Assurance - The number of laboratories performing microbiological analyses of wines has gradually increased in recent years over the world. However, the lack of regular...     

Experiences from the assessment of proficiency testing providers

Following a pilot project in 2001–2002, UKAS accredited nine PT providers. During the course of the pilot and at subsequent surveillance visits, UKAS has gained experience in assessing organisations against the criteria detailed within ISO/IEC Guide 43-1:1997 and ILAC G13:2000. This article explores some of the key aspects that arose during the pilot and how UKAS has accommodated the addition of the accreditation of PT providers in to its range of services.Presented at the Eurachem PT Workshop September 2005, Portorož, Slovenia     

Organisation of proficiency schemes by testing and calibration laboratories

Accreditation and Quality Assurance - Each year, an increasing demand for proficiency testing is seen in the world. Participating in this type of activity has been adopted by testing and...     

Information system and qualifying criteria for proficiency testing schemes

Since October 1998 the European Commission has financed a concerted action on Information System and Qualifying Criteria for Proficiency Testing Schemes within the 4th framework program. As a major result of this project EPTIS, the European Information System on Proficiency Testing Schemes which is available on the Internet since March 2000, is presented in this paper. Today EPTIS contains comprehensive information on approximately 640 proficiency testing schemes from 16 European countries providing information on the state of the art in proficiency testing in Europe. Finally some possible approaches for interlinkages and recognition of proficiency testing schemes are discussed.     

Implementation of proficiency testing schemes for a limited number of participants

A metrological background for the selection and use of proficiency testing (PT) schemes for a limited number N of laboratories-participants (less than 20–30) is discussed. The following basic scenarios are taken into account: (1) adequate matrix certified reference materials (CRM) or in-house reference materials (IHRM) with traceable property values are available for PT use as test items; (2) no appropriate matrix CRM is available, but a CRM or IHRM with traceable property values can be applied as a spike or similar; (3) only an IHRM with limited traceability is available. The discussion also considers the effect of a limited population of PT participants N _p on statistical assessment of the PT results for a given sample of N responses from this population. When N _p is finite and the sample fraction N/N _p is not negligible, a correction to the statistical parameters may be necessary. Scores suitable for laboratory performance assessment in such PT schemes are compared. Presented at the 3rd International Conference on Metrology, November 2006, Tel Aviv, Israel.     

Requirements vs acceptability in proficiency testing schemes and other interlaboratory comparisons

Many laboratories take part in proficiency testing schemes, external quality assessment programmes and other interlaboratory comparisons. These have many similarities but also important differences in their modus operandi and evaluation of performance of participating laboratories. This paper attempts to highlight both the similarities and differences. It also puts particular emphasis on requirements called ”target values for uncertainty” and their meaning. Received: 24 January 2001 Accepted: 25 January 2001     

A statistical strategy for discouraging collusion in split-level proficiency testing schemes

A statistical strategy for discouraging collusion in split-level proficiency testing schemes was developed. When the samples are randomly labeled, the difference in the analyte levels in the two samples can be designed to maximize the probability of detecting collusion when it occurs, so that participants who colluded cannot easily receive satisfactory assessments. This favors providing convictive assessments of participants proficiency and giving the participants a level playing field.     

Benefits arising from proficiency testing schemes: The comparison of analytical methods

 The primary objective of proficiency testing (PT) is in the provision of information and support to participating laboratories, to enable them to monitor and improve the quality of their measurements. However, other benefits can be obtained from PT. These include the comparison of data for a given measurement by different methods, the validation of new methods, and the provision of information for laboratories' customers and accreditation bodies. This paper considers the subject of method comparison, and highlights some of the approaches which can be followed, as well as the practical use to which this can be put, to benefit the analytical community more widely. This is illustrated by a case study concerning the measurement of haze in beer. In this study the United Kingdom Institute of Brewing (IoB) conducted a survey of participants in the Brewing Analytes Proficiency Scheme (BAPS). From the survey data taken together with data from the BAPS scheme, the IoB is now in a position to give guidance on the use of particular instruments and procedures, as well as consider changes to the scope of the BAPS scheme to provide greater benefits for participants concerned with measuring haze. Received: 3 March 1998 · Accepted: 9 June 1998     

Approaches to uncertainty evaluation based on proficiency testing schemes in chemical measurements

Since the advent of the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) founding the principles of uncertainty evaluation, numerous projects have been carried out to develop alternative practical methods when it is impossible to model technical or economical aspects of the measurement process. These methods can use all the experimental data available to the laboratories, such as repeatability, reproducibility, quality-control charts, etc. The studies presented in this paper compare the results obtained by the modelling method from GUM with the uncertainties found by applying alternative methods. They show two examples, one in the field of environmental monitoring, the other in the biomedical field, based on the exploitation of PT schemes results. Presented at BERM-11, October 2007, Tsukuba, Japan.     

Policies, requirements and surveys concerning frequency for participation in proficiency testing schemes

This paper focuses on policies and requirements concerning the frequency for participation in proficiency testing (PT) and provides an overview of the frequency for which PT activities are offered in 25 testing fields. Recent international surveys are summarised.     

Policies,requirements and surveys concerning frequency for participation in proficiency testing schemes

This paper focuses on policies and requirements concerning the frequency for participation in proficiency testing (PT) and provides an overview of the frequency for which PT activities are offered in 25 testing fields. Recent international surveys are summarised.

     

Comparability and compatibility of proficiency testing results in schemes with a limited number of participants

Comparability and compatibility of proficiency testing (PT) results are discussed for schemes with a limited number of participants (less than 20–30) based on the use of reference materials (RMs) as test items. Since PT results are a kind of measurement/analysis/test result, their comparability is a property conditioned by traceability to measurement standards applied in the measurement process. At the same time, metrological traceability of the certified value of the RM (sent to PT participants as test items) is also important, since the PT results are compared with the RM certified value. The RM position in the calibration hierarchy of measurement standards sets the degree of comparability for PT results, which can be assessed in the scheme. However, this assessment is influenced by commutability (adequacy or match) of the matrix RM used for PT and routine samples. Compatibility of PT results is a characteristic of the collective (group) performance of the laboratories participating in PT that can be expressed as closeness of the distribution of the PT results to the distribution of the RM data. Achieving quality-of-measurement/analysis/test results in the framework of the concept “tested once, accepted everywhere” requires both comparability and compatibility of the test results.     

Harmonization and transferability of performance assessment: experience from four serum aluminum proficiency testing schemes

Proficiency testing schemes monitor laboratory performance and provide a stimulus for improvement in accuracy. Where several schemes operate in the same analytical sector, there are risks that assessments of performance may be in conflict. Performance assessment for the determination of trace elements such as aluminum in serum is particularly important due to the high risk of contamination and therefore erroneous results. The objectives of this work were (1) to compare several mathematical models to establish a predefined standard deviation for proficiency assessment and (2) to evaluate the influence of instrumental methods and proficiency testing scheme on the assessment of performance for serum aluminum measurements. For this purpose, three samples were sent to the participants of four proficiency testing schemes. Assigned values were calculated according to algorithm A according to ISO 13528 and standard deviation for proficiency assessment according to three methods based on individual variability, state of the art or previous proficiency testing results. The method based on individual variability produced a more stringent standard deviation compared to analytical imprecision based on the state of the art. The instrumental methods gave similar results, whereas significant differences were observed between the four proficiency testing schemes indicating that harmonization of the standard deviation for proficiency assessment fails to allow transferability from one proficiency testing scheme to another and that additional factor(s) contribute to variability in performance assessment.     

Approaching target uncertainty in proficiency testing schemes: experience in the field of water measurement

Good correspondence between evaluations of the proficiency testing data for water measurements according to different scoring schemes was found as a result of implementation of the measurement quality according to the target uncertainty defined in the Drinking Water Directive. The accuracy of the evaluation is determined by the uncertainty of the assigned value, and this uncertainty should be in correspondence with the target uncertainty. Modification of the zeta-score by the thorough application of the target uncertainty is presented. It is convenient for generalised presentation of the proficiency testing data. The allowed bias is included as a linear term on the measured value scale, as it is treated in uncertainty analysis. The importance of implementation of the target measurement uncertainty in other fields of the routine measurements is indicated.     

Accreditation of proficiency-testing schemes in The Netherlands

Proficiency testing by laboratories, national accreditation bodies, and other third parties is becoming more and more considered as a standard and integral part of the quality control system. Therefore, it is of utmost importance that the quality of the provided proficiency-testing (PT) service is outstanding. If PT-schemes are set up in order to help laboratories monitor and improve their quality, PT-schemes need not only be of high quality themselves, but the organizer also needs to be able to demonstrate this. In The Netherlands formal accreditation of the organization of proficiency testing schemes is used as a tool to guarantee high quality schemes and also to enable organizers to demonstrate their competence. Since 1996, the Dutch Council for Accreditation (RvA) has used the ISO-Guide 43–1 to assess PT-organizers in The Netherlands. From January 2000, the ISO-guide 43–1 was replaced by the ILAC G13 document for assessing organizers. Up till now, four institutes have been accredited by the RvA for the organization of PT-schemes.