Unification in linear temporal logic LTL

We prove that a propositional Linear Temporal Logic with Until and Next (LTL) has unitary unification. Moreover, for every unifiable in LTL formula A there is a most general projective unifier, corresponding to some projective formula B, such that A is derivable from B in LTL. On the other hand, it can be shown that not every open and unifiable in LTL formula is projective. We also present an algorithm for constructing a most general unifier.     

Proof-theoretical investigation of temporal logic with time gaps

In the paper, the first-order intuitionistic temporal logic sequent calculus LBJ is considered. The invertibility of some of the LBJ rules, syntactic admissibility of the structural rules and the cut rule in LBJ, as well as Harrop and Craig's interpolation theorems for LBJ are proved. Gentzen's midsequent theorem is proved for the LBJ' calculus which is obtained from LBJ by removing the antecedent disjunction rule from it. Published in Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 255–276, July–September, 2000.     

Infinitary calculus for a restricted first-order linear temporal logic without contraction on quantified formulas

An infinitary calculus for a restricted fragment of the first-order linear temporal logic is considered. We prove that for this fragment one can construct the infinitary calculusG _Lω ^* without contraction on predicate formulas. The calculusG _Lω ^* possesses the following properties: (1) the succedent rule for the existential quantifier is included into the corresponding axiom; (2) the premise of the antecedent rule for the universal quantifier does not contain a duplicate of the main formula. The soundness and completness ofG _Lω ^* are also proved. Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Akademijos 4, 2600 Vilnius, Lithuania. Translated from Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 378–397, July–September, 1999. Translated by R. Lapinskas     

An axiomatization for the linear logic of knowledge and time LTK r with intransitive time relation

We study the problem of the axiomatization of the linear multimodal logic of knowledge and time LTK _r with reflexive intransitive time relation. The logic is defined semantically as the set of formulas true on frames of a special kind. The LTK _r -frames are linear chains of clusters connected by a reflexive intransitive relation R _T which simulates time. Elements inside a cluster are connected by several equivalence relations imitating the knowledge of different agents. The main result of the article is the proof of the fact that the finite set of formulas proposed by the authors is an axiomatization of the logic LTK _r with reflexive intransitive time relation.     

Models of linear logic

We engage a study of nonmodal linear logic which takes times ⊗ and the linear conditional ⊸ to be the basic connectives instead of times and linear negation ()^⊥ as in Girard's approach. This difference enables us to obtain a very large subsystem of linear logic (called positive linear logic) without an involutionary negation (if the law of double negation is removed from linear logic in Girard's formulation, the resulting subsystem is extremely limited). Our approach enables us to obtain several natural models for various subsystems of linear logic, including a generic model for the so-called minimal linear logic. In particular, it is seen that these models arise spontaneously in the transition from set theory to multiset theory. We also construct a model of full (nonmodal) linear logic that is generic relative to any model of positive linear logic. However, the problem of constructing a generic model for positive linear logic remains open. Bibliography: 2 titles. Published inZapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Vol. 220, 1995, pp. 23–35. Original     

Local computation in linear logic

This work deals with the exponential fragment of Girard's linear logic ([3]) without the contraction rule, a logical system which has a natural relation with the direct logic ([10], [7]). A new sequent calculus for this logic is presented in order to remove the weakening rule and recover its behavior via a special treatment of the propositional constants, so that the process of cut-elimination can be performed using only “local” reductions. Hence a typed calculus, which admits only local rewriting rules, can be introduced in a natural manner. Its main properties — normalizability and confluence — has been investigated; moreover this calculus has been proved to satisfy a Curry-Howard isomorphism ([6]) with respect to the logical system in question. MSC: 03B40, 03F05.     

Saturated calculus for Horn-like sequents of a complete class of a linear temporal first order logic

A saturated calculus for the so-called Horn-like sequents of a complete class of a linear temporal logic of the first order is described. The saturated calculus contains neither induction-like postulates nor cut-like rules. Instead of induction-like postulates the saturated calculus contains a finite set of “saturated” sequents, which (1) capture and reflect the periodic structure of inductive reasoning (i.e., a reasoning which applies induction-like postulates); (2) show that “almost nothing new” can be obtained by continuing the process of derivation of a given sequent; (3) present an explicit way of generating the so-called invariant formula in induction-like rules. The saturated calculus for Horn-like sequents allows one: (1) to prove in an obvious way the completeness of a restricted linear temporal logic of the first order; (2) to construct a computer-aided proof system for this logic; (3) to prove the decidability of this logic for logically decidable Horn-like sequents. Bibliography: 15 titles. Translated fromZapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Vol. 220, 1995, pp. 123–144. Translated by R. Pliuškevičius.     

On temporal logic S4Dbr

In this paper, we study the temporal logic S4Dbr with two temporal operators “always” and “eventually.” An equivalent sequent calculus is presented with formulae as modal clauses or modal clauses starting with operator “always.” An upper bound of deduction tree is given for propositional logic. A theorem prover for propositional logic is written in SWI-Prolog. Published in LietuvosMatematikos Rinkinys, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 203–214, April–June, 2006.     

Modeling linear logic with implicit functions

Just as intuitionistic proofs can be modeled by functions, linear logic proofs, being symmetric in the inputs and outputs, can be modeled by relations (for example, cliques in coherence spaces). However generic relations do not establish any functional dependence between the arguments, and therefore it is questionable whether they can be thought as reasonable generalizations of functions. On the other hand, in some situations (typically in differential calculus) one can speak in some precise sense about an implicit functional dependence defined by a relation. It turns out that it is possible to model linear logic with implicit functions rather than general relations, an adequate language for such a semantics being (elementary) differential calculus. This results in a non-degenerate model enjoying quite strong completeness properties.     

The complexity of temporal logic over the reals

It is shown that the decision problem for the temporal logic with until and since connectives over real-numbers time is PSPACE-complete. This is the most practically useful dense time temporal logic.     

Bounded linear-time temporal logic: A proof-theoretic investigation

Propositional and first-order bounded linear-time temporal logics (BLTL and FBLTL, respectively) are introduced by restricting Gentzen type sequent calculi for linear-time temporal logics. The corresponding Robinson type resolution calculi, RC and FRC for BLTL and FBLTL respectively are obtained. To prove the equivalence between FRC and FBLTL, a temporal version of Herbrand theorem is used. The completeness theorems for BLTL and FBLTL are proved for simple semantics with both a bounded time domain and some bounded valuation conditions on temporal operators. The cut-elimination theorems for BLTL and FBLTL are also proved using some theorems for embedding BLTL and FBLTL into propositional (first-order, respectively) classical logic. Although FBLTL is undecidable, its monadic fragment is shown to be decidable.     

Normal deduction in the intuitionistic linear logic

We describe a natural deduction system NDIL for the second order intuitionistic linear logic which admits normalization and has a subformula property. NDIL is an extension of the system for !-free multiplicative linear logic constructed by the author and elaborated by A. Babaev. Main new feature here is the treatment of the modality !. It uses a device inspired by D. Prawitz' treatment of S4 combined with a construction introduced by the author to avoid cut-like constructions used in -elimination and global restrictions employed by Prawitz. Normal form for natural deduction is obtained by Prawitz translation of cut-free sequent derivations. Received: March 29, 1996     

Translating statements of symbolic logic into zero-one linear programming

Symbolic logic can be used to translate verbal statements of the optimization problem into an exact mathematical form. There are then three stages in the problem formulation—the verbal stage, the logical stage and the mathematical stage. The purpose of this paper is to translate statements of symbolic logic into the language of zero-one linear programming. Concepts of symbolic logic and zero-one linear programming will be described with examples of translating verbal statements into symbolic logic, and of translating logical statements into a mathematically equivalent form.     

A linear time bin-packing algorithm

In the bin-packing problem a list L of numbers in (0, 1] is to be packed into unit capacity bins. Let $\text{L}{}^1$ denote the minimum number of bins required. We present a linear time bin-packing algorithm for the off-line version of this problem. The algorithm uses at most $\text{4}\text{3}\text{L1 + 2}$ bins.