Stochastic two-target pursuit-evasion differential games in the plane

A stochastic version of a two-target homicidal chauffeur, pursuit-evasion differential game (using polar coordinates) is considered. This is used to model a dogfight between a very agile playerQ and a less maneuverable playerP. First, the case where both players have complete observation of the state of the game is considered. A numerical study is conducted, by solving numerically a nonlinear partial differential equation on a torus in ², to investigate the role of the parameters of speed, maneuverability, and performance of the weapon systems, in the encounter. Second, the model is extended to include the case where playerP is jamming playerQ's measurements of , where denotes the bearing ofQ fromP. A numerical study is conducted, by solving numerically a nonlinear partial differential equation on a generalized torus in ³, to investigate the role of the jamming parameter on the outcome of the combat.     

Bicriterion differential games with qualitative outcomes

Combat games are studied as bicriterion differential games with qualitative outcomes determined by threshold values on the criterion functions. Survival and capture strategies of the players are defined using the notion of security levels. Closest approach survival strategies (CASS) and minimum risk capture strategies (MRCS) are important strategies for the players identified as solutions to four optimization problems involving security levels. These are used, in combination with the preference orderings of the qualitative outcomes by the players, to delineate the win regions and the secured draw and mutual kill regions for the players. It is shown that the secured draw regions and the secured mutual kill regions for the two players are not necessarily the same. Simple illustrative examples are given.This paper is based partially on research supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India, through a Research Associateship Grant to the second author.     

Formulation and analysis of combat problems as zero-sum bicriterion differential games

In this paper, we present a formulation and analysis of a combat game between two players as a zero-sum bicriterion differential game. Each player's twin objectives of terminating the game on his own target set, while simultaneously avoiding his opponent's target set, are quantified in this approach. The solution in open-loop pure strategies is sought from among the Pareto-optimal security strategies of the players. A specific preference ordering on the outcomes is used to classify initial events in the assured win, draw, and mutual kill regions for the players. The method is compared with the event-constrained differential game approach, recently proposed by others. Finally, a simple example of the turret game is solved to illustrate the use of this method.     

An equitable solution for multicriteria bargaining games

In this paper we study bargaining models where the agents consider several criteria to evaluate the results of the negotiation process. We propose a new solution concept for multicriteria bargaining games based on the distance to a utopian minimum level vector. This solution is a particular case of the class of the generalized leximin solutions and can be characterized as the solution of a finite sequence of minimax programming problems.     

Some thoughts on saddle-point conditions and information structures in zero-sum differential games

For a very simple two-stage, linear-quadratic, zero-sum difference game with dynamic information structure, we show that (i) there exist nonlinear saddle-point strategies which require the same existence conditions as the well-known linear, closed-loop, no-memory solution and (ii) there exist both linear and nonlinear saddle-point strategies which require more stringent conditions than the unique open-loop solution. We then discuss the implication of this result with respect to the existence of saddle points in zero-sum differential games for different information patterns.     

Solution concepts in two-person multicriteria games

In this paper, we propose new solution concepts for multicriteria games and compare them with existing ones. The general setting is that of two-person finite games in normal form (matrix games) with pure and mixed strategy sets for the players. The notions of efficiency (Pareto optimality), security levels, and response strategies have all been used in defining solutions ranging from equilibrium points to Pareto saddle points. Methods for obtaining strategies that yield Pareto security levels to the players or Pareto saddle points to the game, when they exist, are presented. Finally, we study games with more than two qualitative outcomes such as combat games. Using the notion of guaranteed outcomes, we obtain saddle-point solutions in mixed strategies for a number of cases. Examples illustrating the concepts, methods, and solutions are included.     

Perturbation theory for games in normal form and stochastic games

In this paper, the effect on values and optimal strategies of perturbations of game parameters (payoff function, transition probability function, and discount factor) is studied for the class of zero-sum games in normal form and for the class of stationary, discounted, two-person, zero-sum stochastic games.A main result is that, under certain conditions, the value depends on these parameters in a pointwise Lipschitz continuous way and that the sets of -optimal strategies for both players are upper semicontinuous multifunctions of the game parameters.Extensions to general-sum games and nonstationary stochastic games are also indicated.     

The price of anarchy for non-atomic congestion games with symmetric cost maps and elastic demands

By showing that there is an upper bound for the price of anarchyρ(Γ) for a non-atomic congestion game Γ with only separable cost maps and fixed demands, Roughgarden and Tardos show that the cost of forgoing centralized control is mild. This letter shows that there is an upper bound for ρ(Γ) in Γ for fixed demands with symmetric cost maps. It also shows that there is a weaker bound for ρ(Γ) in Γ with elastic demands.     

A new approach toN-person,nonzero-sum,linear differential games

It is shown that there exist equilibrium strategies forn-person, nonero-sum, linear differential games if the cost to each player is convex. The approach used is believed to be novel, and is based on a theorem of Fan.This research was supported by the National Research Council of Canada under Grant No. A-7790.     

The sequence method for finding solutions to infinite games: A first demonstrating example

A noncooperative infinite game can be approached by a sequence of discrete games. For each game in the sequence, a Nash solution can be found as well as their limit. This idea and procedure was used before as a theoretical device to prove existence of solutions to games with continuous payoffs and recently even for a class of games with discontinuous ones (Dasgupta and Maskin, 1981). No one, however, used the method for the actual solution of a game. Here, an example demonstrates the method's usefulness in finding a solution to a two-person game on the unit square with discontinuous payoff functions.The author wishes to thank D. McFadden for very useful discussions. Financial support was provided in part by NSF Grant No. SOC-72-05551A02 to the University of California, Berkeley, California.     

Sufficient conditions for optimality of threat strategies in a differential game

The problem of defining threat strategies in nonzero-sum games is considered, and a definition of optimal threat strategies is proposed in the static case. This definition is then extended to differential games, and sufficient conditions for optimality of threat strategies are derived. These are then applied to a simple example. The definition proposed here is then compared with the definition of threat strategies given by Nash.     

Methods for comparison of coalition influence on games in characteristic function form and their interrelationships

This paper extends two existent methods, called the blockability relation and the viability relation, for simple games to compare influence of coalitions, to those for games in characteristic function form, and shows that the newly defined relations satisfy transitivity and completeness. It is shown in this paper that for every game in characteristic function form the blockability relation and the viability relation have a complementary interrelationship.     

An average lexicographic value for cooperative games

For games with a non-empty core the Alexia value is introduced, a value which averages the lexicographic maxima of the core. It is seen that the Alexia value coincides with the Shapley value for convex games, and with the nucleolus for strongly compromise admissible games and big boss games. For simple flow games, clan games and compromise stable games an explicit expression and interpretation of the Alexia value is derived. Furthermore it is shown that the reverse Alexia value, defined by averaging the lexicographic minima of the core, coincides with the Alexia value for convex games and compromise stable games.     

Interaction indices for games on combinatorial structures with forbidden coalitions

The notion of interaction among a set of players has been defined on the Boolean lattice and Cartesian products of lattices. The aim of this paper is to extend this concept to combinatorial structures with forbidden coalitions. The set of feasible coalitions is supposed to fulfil some general conditions. This general representation encompasses convex geometries, antimatroids, augmenting systems and distributive lattices. Two axiomatic characterizations are obtained. They both assume that the Shapley value is already defined on the combinatorial structures. The first one is restricted to pairs of players and is based on a generalization of a recursivity axiom that uniquely specifies the interaction index from the Shapley value when all coalitions are permitted. This unique correspondence cannot be maintained when some coalitions are forbidden. From this, a weak recursivity axiom is defined. We show that this axiom together with linearity and dummy player are sufficient to specify the interaction index. The second axiomatic characterization is obtained from the linearity, dummy player and partnership axioms. An interpretation of the interaction index in the context of surplus sharing is also proposed. Finally, our interaction index is instantiated to the case of games under precedence constraints.     

On the uniqueness of Nash strategies for a class of analytic differential games

The uniqueness of Nash equilibria is shown for the case where the data of the problem are analytic functions and the admissible strategy spaces are restricted to analytic functions of the current state and time.This work was supported in part by the Joint Services Electronics Program (US Army, US Navy, and US Air Force) under Contract No. DAAB-07-72-C-0259, in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. ENG-74-20091, and in part by the Department of Energy, Electric Energy Systems Division under Contract No. US ERDA EX-76-C-01-2088.     

A reference case for mean field games models

In this article, we present a reference case of mean field games. This case can be seen as a reference for two main reasons. First, the case is simple enough to allow for explicit resolution: Bellman functions are quadratic, stationary measures are normal and stability can be dealt with explicitly using Hermite polynomials. Second, in spite of its simplicity, the case is rich enough in terms of mathematics to be generalized and to inspire the study of more complex models that may not be as tractable as this one.     

A necessary and sufficient condition for Pareto-optimal security strategies in multicriteria matrix games

In this paper, a scalar game is derived from a zero-sum multicriteria matrix game, and it is proved that the solution of the new game with strictly positive scalarization is a necessary and sufficient condition for a strategy to be a Pareto-optimal security strategy (POSS) for one of the players in the original game. This is done by proving that a certain set, which is the extension of the set of security level vectors in the criterion function space, is convex and polyhedral. It is also established that only a finite number of scalarizations are necessary to obtain all the POSS for a player. An example is included to illustrate the main steps in the proof.This work was done while the author was a Research Associate in the Department of Electrical Engineering at the Indian Institute of Science and was financially supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Delhi, India.The author wishes to express his gratefulness to Professor U. R. Prasad for helpful discussions and to two anonymous referees for suggestions which led to an improved presentation.     

Definitions of equilibrium in network formation games

We examine a variety of stability and equilibrium definitions that have been used to study the formation of social networks among a group of players. In particular we compare variations on three types of definitions: those based on a pairwise stability notion, those based on the Nash equilibria of a link formation game, and those based on equilibria of a link formation game where transfers are possible.Bloch is also affiliated with the University of Warwick.     

Fundamentals of simple games from a viewpoint of blockability relations

This paper shows some elementary facts on simple games with respect to blockability relations. It is verified in this paper that fundamental concepts on simple games as null players, dictators, veto players, and so on can be expressed in terms of blockability relations. More, some new concepts as “conflict-free” and so on, are introduced from the viewpoint of blockability relations into the framework of simple games.