Spectrophotometric determination of uranium(VI) using a synergic mixture of ethyl acetoacetate and pyridine

A method is proposed for the extractive spectrophotometric determination of uranium(VI) using the synergic combination of ethyl acetoacetate (EAA) and pyridine (Py) as extractants. The optimum conditions have been evaluated by varying pH and ethyl acetoacetate and pyridine concentration. The nature of the extracted species has been determined by 1g D-1g C plots and the extracted species was found to be UO₂(EAA)₂.Py. The method has been applied for the separation and determination of uranium(VI) from synthetic mixtures.     

Liquid-liquid extraction of Th4+ and UO 2 2+ by LIX-26 and its mixtures

Solvent extractions of thorium(IV) and uranium(VI) by a commercially available chelating extractant LIX-26 (an alkylated 8-hydroxyquinoline) or 8-hydroxyquinoline, benzoic or salicylic acid, dipentyl sulphoxide (DPSO) and their mixtures with butanol as modifier in benzene/methylisobutyl ketone (MIBK) as the diluent have been studied. Extraction of uranium(VI) by 10% LIX-26 and 10% butanol in benzene becomes quantitative at pH 5.0. The pH 0.5 values for the extraction of thorium(IV) and uranium(VI) are 4.95 and 3.35, respectively. Quantitative extraction of thorium(IV) by the mixture of 0.1 M oxine and 0.1 M salicylic acid in methylisobutyl ketone was observed at pH 5.0. The influence of concentration of various anions on the extraction of Th⁴⁺ by mixtures of LIX-26 and benzoic acid has been studied. Studies on extraction of thorium(IV) and uranium(VI) by mixtures of LIX-26 (HQ) and DPSO show that the extracted species are possibly of the type [ThQ₂/DPSO/₂/SCN/₂] and [UO₂Q₂/DPSO/], respectively.     

Extraction and separation of uranium(VI) and protactinium(V) with 1-(4-tolyl)-2-methyl-3-hydroxy-4-pyridone

Summary The extraction of uranium(VI) from aqueous hydrochloric or nitric acid, and the extraction of protactinium from hydrochloric acid by 1-(4-tolyl)-2-methyl-3-hydroxy-4-pyridone (HY) dissolved in chloroform has been studied. At pH >4, uranium (VI) is quantitatively extracted while at pH < 1 practically all the uranium remains in the aqueous phase. At hydrochloric acid concentrations lower than 1M, protactinium(V) is quantitatively extracted while at hydrochloric acid concentration higher than 5M practically all the protactinium remains in the aqueous phase. This difference in extraction of uranium and protactinium was utilized for their separation. From 0.5M hydrochloric acid, protactinium is quantitatively extracted, and separated from uranium.The composition of the extracted uranium(VI) and protactinium (V) complexes was studied. A uranium complex with the formula UO₂Y₂ · HY was isolated from the chloroform solution. The solution of this complex in chloroform has a maximum absorbance at 319 nm and the molar absorptivity is 3.1×10⁴ l · mole^–1 · cm^–1. Owing to this property uranium can be determined spectro-photometrically directly in the organic phase.

---

Zusammenfassung Die Extraktion von Uran(VI) aus wäßriger Salzsäure oder Salpetersäure sowie die Extraktion von Protaktinium aus Salzsäure mit 1-(4-Tolyl)-2-methyl-3-hydroxy-4-pyridon (HY) in chloroformischer Lösung wurde untersucht. Bei pH > 4 wird U(VI) quantitativ extrahiert, während bei pH < 1 praktisch alles Uran in der wäßrigen Phase bleibt. Bei Salzsäurekonzen-trationen unter 1-m wird Protaktinium (V) quantitativ extrahiert, während bei Salzsäurekonzentrationen über 5-m praktisch alles Pa in der wäßrigen Phase bleibt. Dieser Unterschied bei der Extraktion der beiden Elemente wurde für deren Trennung benützt. Pa wird aus 0,5-m Salzsäure quantitativ extrahiert und so von Uran getrennt.Die Zusammensetzung der extrahierten U (VI)- und Pa (V)-Komplexe wurde untersucht. Ein Urankomplex der Formel UO₂ · Y₂ · HY wurde aus der Chloroformlösung isoliert. Die Lösung dieses Komplexes in Chloroform hat ein Absorptionsmaximum bei 319 nm und eine molare Extinktion von 3,1 · 10⁴ l · mol^–1 · cm^–1. Auf Grund dieser Eigenschaft kann Uran spektrophotometrisch direkt in der organischen Phase bestimmt werden.

     

Extractive separation of uranium(VI) as perchlorate/chloroacetate complexes with 1-phenyl-2,3 dimethyl-5-pyrazolone and its applications

The extraction of U(VI) with 1-phenyl 2,3 dimethyl-5-pyrazolone, at a pH of 2.5, in the presence of common anions, like perchlorate and tri-, di-, and monochloroacetates has been investigated. The optimum experimental conditions have been evaluated by studying various parameters such as pH, equilibration period, reagent concentration, metal concentration, and solvents. Effect of diverse anions and cations on the extraction has also been studied. The extracted species, determined by log D - log R plots are represented as, [UO₂(Apy)₄(ClO₄)₂], [UO₂(Apy)₂(TCA)₂], [UO₂(Apy)₂(DCA)₂], [UO₂(Apy)(H₂O)(MCA)₂]. The conditional stability constants of the quantitatively extracted complexes are calculated. The proposed method allows the selective separation of uranium(VI) from multicomponent mixtures and geological matrices and is also applied for the separation and chemical characterization of impurities at trace and ultratrace levels.     

Liquid–liquid extraction of uranium(VI) using cyanex 272 in toluene from sodium salicylate medium

Liquid–liquid extraction and separation studies of uranium have been carried out from sodium salicylate media using cyanex 272 in toluene. Uranium was quantitatively extracted by 1 × 10⁻³ M sodium salicylate with 5 × 10⁻⁴ M cyanex 272 in toluene. The extracted uranium(VI) was stripped out quantitatively from the organic phase with 1.0 M hydrochloric acid and determined spectrophotometrically with arsenazo(III) at 660 nm. The effect of concentration of sodium salicylate, extractant, diluents, metal ion and strippants has been studied. Separation of uranium(VI) from other elements was achieved from binary as well as from multicomponent mixtures. The method was extended for the separation and determination of uranium(VI) in geological samples. The method is simple, rapid and selective with good reproducibility (approximately ± 2%).     

Novel Method for the Fast Separation and Purification of Molybdenum(VI) from Fission Products of Uranium with Aminofunctionalized Mesoporous Molecular Sieves (AMMS) Modified by Dicyclohexyl‐18‐Crown‐6 and S‐N Tetradentate Schiff's Base

Abstract

A novel method for the fast separation and purification of Mo(VI) from fission products of uranium is presented. All impurities of Mo(VI) including, lead, ytterbium, zirconium, lanthanum, cerium, ytterium, uranium, strontium, and barium ions, were fast extracted by using aminofunctionalized mesoporos molecular sieve (AMMS) modified by dicyclohexyl‐18‐crown‐6 (DCCE) and 2‐({(E)‐1,2‐diphenyl‐2[(2‐2‐sulfanylphenyl)imino]ethylidene}amino)‐1‐benzenethiol (SNSB). The time of extraction, pH, and flow rate, amount of modified aminofunctionalized mesoporos molecular sieve (MAMMS), break‐through volume, and maximum capacity of MAMMS were investigated. The proposed method was applied to separation and purification of Mo(VI) from the impurities of fission products of uranium.     

Preconcentration of U(VI) from aqueous solutions after sorption using Sorel’s cement in dynamic mode

Summary Mg(OH)₂ was identified as a component of Sorel’s cement being a very strong sorbent for uranium. Sorel’s cement is a mixture of MgO, MgCl₂ and water. The optimal conditions for the adsorption of U(VI) was studied by the batch method. A contact time of 2 hours was found to be optimum. Maximum U(VI) uptake was observed in a pH range of 5.5-6.5 with a sorption constant of K_ads = 0.9 h^-1 at initial concentration of 20 ppm. Polypropylene columns filled with 2 g of Sorel’s cement at a mesh size of 35 were used for the preconcentration of uranium by passing 8 l of water containing 10 ppb U(VI). A flow rate of 0.25 ml/min and a bed height of 5 cm were found to be the optimum for the U(VI) separation. A 5 wt% triphenylphosphine oxide solution in toluene was used as an organic solvent for the separation of uranium from interfering elements such as iron(III) and thorium(IV), prior to spectrophotometric analysis. The determination of U(VI) was accomplished by adding Arsenazo III as a coloring reagent to the solution and using a UV-160A spectrophotometer.     

Organophosphinic,phosphonic acids and their binary mixtures as extractants for molybdenum(VI) and uranium(VI) from aqueous HCl media

Extraction studies of uranium(VI) and molybdenum(VI) with organophosphoric, phosphinic acid and its thiosubstituted derivatives have been carried out from 0.1–1.0M HCl solutions. The extracted species are proposed to be UO₂R₂ and MoO₂ CIR on the basis of slope analysis for uranium(VI) and molybdenum(VI), respectively. The extraction efficiencies of PC-88A, Cyanex 272, Cyanex 301 and Cyanex 302 in the extraction of molybdenum(VI) and uranium(VI) are compared. Synergistic effects have been studied with binary mixtures of extractants. Separation of molybdenum(VI) from uranium(VI) is feasible by Cyanex 301 from 1M HCl, the separation factor log being 2.3.     

Extraction and separation of uranium and lead with liquid anion-exchangers

A method is proposed for the extraction and separation of microgram amounts of uranium(VI) and lead(II) from sodium salicylate solution with high molecular-weight amines such as Aliquat 336, TOA, TIOA, Amberlite LA-1 or Amberlite LA-2 dissolved in xylene. From a critical study of pH, salicylate concentration, amine concentration, diluent and period of equilibration, the optimum conditions were identified. The method permits separation of uranium and lead from binary mixtures with metal ions commonly associated with them, the determination of uranium, and of lead in air samples.     

Synergistic extraction and separation studies of uranium(VI)

A method is described for the extractive separation and spectrophotometric determination of uranium(VI) from an aqueous solution of pH 5.0–7.0 using benzoylacetone (bzac) and pyridine (py) dissolved in toluene as extractants. The extracted species are UO₂(bzac(₂·2py. The method provides separation of uranium(VI) from lanthanum(III), samarium(III), neodymium(III), cerium(III) and thorium(IV). The method is precise, accurate, fast and selective.     

Determination of subnanomolar concentrations of tungsten (VI) by catalytic adsorption polarography

A new differential pulse polarographic method for the determination of W(VI) using a catalytic adsorption wave is described. W(VI) is first chelated by 7-iodo-8-hydroxyquinoline-5-sulfonic acid at pH 0.5. The complex ion formed is strongly adsorbed on the surface of a dropping mercury electrode. At a potential of –0.95 V versus the Ag/AgCl (3M KCl) reference electrode the adsorbed complex is reduced by the polarographic current and oxidized very fast by hydrated hydrogen ions providing the oxidized form of the complex ion for repeated redox cycles. As the redox process taking place in the electric double layer, the diffusion of the complex does not limit the polarographic current. Therefore, high currents occur, and consequently, a very high sensitivity is obtained. The practical detection limit (PDL) is 3.7 ng W/kg solution corresponding to 2 × 10^–11 M. The standard deviation of single values is 1.2 ng/kg at the concentration of 91 ng/kg lying in the middle of the linear part of the calibration curve. Because Mo (VI) gives a very similar catalytic adsorption wave, serious mutual interferences occur in the analysis of mixtures of both species. An effective separation of Mo(VI) was worked out. Using 1% (w/v) solution of trioctylphosphinoxide in kerosene, Mo(VI) can almost completely be extracted from 1.8M HCl with a threefold extraction resulting in a separation factor of 40000.     

Determination of trace uranyl ions in aquatic medium by a useful and simple method

Determination of trace uranyl ions was performed by using mixed micellar system and spectrophotometric determination. The method is based on cloud point extraction of uranyl ions after formation of an ion-association complex in the presence of Celestine Blue and sodium dodecyl sulfate. Then, the formed complex was extracted to non-ionic surfactant phase of Triton X-114 at pH 8.0. The optimal extraction and reaction conditions (e.g. concentrations and types of surfactants, concentration of complex forming agent, incubation conditions) were studied and analytical characteristics of the method (e.g. limit of detection, linear range, pre-concentration factor) were obtained by experimental studies. Linearity was obeyed in the range of 50–1,500 ng mL^?1 for uranium(VI) ion and the detection limit of is 14.20 ng mL^?1. The interference effects of common ions were also tested and validation studies were performed by using recovery test. The method was applied to the determination of uranium(VI) in several real samples.     

Solvent Extraction Separation of Th(IV) and U(VI) with PC-88A

Liquid-liquid extraction of Th(IV) and U(VI) has been investigated by commercial extractant PC-88A in toluene. The optimum conditions for extraction of these metals have been established by studying the various parameters like acid concentration/pH, reagent concentration, diluents and shaking time. The extraction of Th(IV) was found to be quantitative with 0.1–1.0M HNO₃ acid and in the pH range 1.0–4.0 while U(VI) was completely extracted in the pH range 1.0–3.5 with 2.5·10^–2M and 2.·10^–2M PC-88A in toluene, respectively. The probable extracted species have been ascertained by log D-log C plot as ThR₄·4HR and UO₂R₂·2HR, respectively. The method permits separation of Th(IV) and U(VI) from associated metals with a recovery of 99.0%.     

Chromatographic separation of uranium(VI) from other elements using L-valine and poly[dibenzo-18-crown-6]

A selective and effective column chromatographic separation method has been developed for uranium(VI) using poly[dibenzo-18-crown-6]. The separation was carried out in L-valine medium. The adsorption of uranium(VI) was quantitative from 1.0 × 10⁻⁴ to 1 × 10⁻¹ M of L-valine. Amongst various eluents 2.0–8.0 M hydrochloric acid, 1.0–4.0 M sulfuric acid, 1.0–5.0 M perchloric acid, 6.0–8.0 M hydrobromic acid and 5.0–6.0 M acetic acid were found to be efficient eluents for uranium(Vl). The capacity of poly[dibenzo-18-crown-6] for uranium(VI) was 0.25 ± 0.01 mmol/g of crown polymer. Uranium(VI) was separated from number of cations and anions in binary mixtures in which most of the cations and anions show a very high tolerance limit. The selective separation of uranium(VI) was carried out from multicomponent mixtures. The method was extended to determination of uranium(VI) in geological samples. The method is simple, rapid and selective with good reproducibility (approximately ∼2%).     

Extraction of Uranium with 2-Ethylhexyl Phosphonic Acid Mono-2-Ethylhexyl Ester (PC-88A)

The extraction behavior of uranium (VI) from chloride medium with 2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid mono-2-ethylhexyl ester (PC-88A) in dodecane has been investigated under wide range of conditions. Attempts have been made to establish the extraction mechanism of uranium(VI) with PC-88A. Treatment of the distribution data by slope analysis technique showed the formation of a monomeric complex of the nature [UO₂(A₂H)₂]. Formation of this species was also confirmed by non-linear least square regression of the distribution data to the mathematical expression correlating percentage extraction and acidity. In this investigation attempts have also been made to develop a mathematical model for the system (UO₂Cl₂-HCl-H₂O-PC-88A-dodecane) using experimental data on the distribution of uranium against initial aqueous acidity at different initial metal concentration. The mathematical model D = 37.547±0.223/C _i ^1/2×[H _i ]² can be used to predict the concentration of uranium in organic as well as in aqueous phases at any initial concentration of uranium [C _i ] and initial hydrogen ion concentration [H _i ]. The extraction constant (K _ex ) has been calculated.     

A sensitive spectrophotometric method for the determination of trace amounts of uranium(VI) using 2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde isonicotinoyl hydrazone

The reaction between uranium(VI) and 2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde isonicotinoyl hydrazone (2HNAINH) has been investigated in HCl-sodium acetate buffers and a highly sensitive and simple procedure for the determination of uranium(VI) is suggested. The orange red colored complex showed maximum absorption at 430 nm in buffer solutions of pH 3. Beer's law is obeyed in the range of 0.2 to 33 g ml^–1. The molar absorptivity and Sandell's sensitivity are found to be 9.6×10³ mol·l^–1 and 0.025 g cm^–2, respectively. The composition of the complex between metal and reagent is found to be 11. The effect of diverse ions is also studied and the method is successfully applied for the determination of uranium in synthetic mixtures.     

Smart thorium and uranium determination exploiting renewable solid-phase extraction applied to environmental samples in a wide concentration range

A smart fully automated system is proposed for determination of thorium and uranium in a wide concentration range, reaching environmental levels. The hyphenation of lab-on-valve (LOV) and multisyringe flow injection analysis (MSFIA), coupled to a long path length liquid waveguide capillary cell, allows the spectrophotometric determination of thorium and uranium in different types of environmental sample matrices achieving high selectivity and sensitivity levels. Online separation and preconcentration of thorium and uranium is carried out by means of Uranium and TEtraValents Actinides resin. The potential of the LOV–MSFIA makes possible the full automation of the system by the in-line regeneration of the column and its combination with a smart methodology is a step forward in automation. After elution, thorium(IV) and uranium(VI) are spectrophotometrically detected after reaction with arsenazo-III. We propose a rapid, inexpensive, and fully automated method to determine thorium(IV) and uranium(VI) in a wide concentration range (0–1,200 and 0–2,000 μg L^-1 Th and U, respectively). Limits of detection reached are 5.9 ηg L^-1 of uranium and 60 ηg L^-1 of thorium. Different water sample matrices (seawater, well water, freshwater, tap water, and mineral water), and a channel sediment reference material which contained thorium and uranium were satisfactorily analyzed with the proposed method.     

Preconcentration of trace uranium from seawater with solid phase extraction followed by differential pulse polarographic determination in chloroform eluate

In the present study, an effective method is presented for the separation and preconcentration of uranium (VI) by solid phase extraction (SPE). For this purpose, U(VI) oxinate is formed by the reaction of U(VI) with 8-hydroxyquinoline and adsorbed onto the octylsilane (C-8) SPE cartridge. The analyte is completely eluted with chloroform and determined by differential pulse polarography. The SPE conditions were optimized by evaluating the effective factors such as pH, oxine concentration, type and concentration of buffer and masking agent. By the proposed method a preconcentration factor more than 100 was achieved. The average recovery of uranium (VI) oxinate (0.1 mg l(-1)) was 99.8%. The relative standard deviation was 1.6% for seven replicate determinations of uranyl ion in the solution with a concentration 20 mug l(-1). Some concomitant ions such as Ca(+2), Mg(+2) and Fe(+3) which interfere in extraction or determination process of uranium were masked with EDTA in aqueous phase during the extraction process. The proposed method was successfully used for the determination of uranium in Caspian Sea and Persian Gulf water samples.     

Spectrophotometric determination of uranium with 1-[(5-Methyl-2-pyridyl)azo]-2-naphthol

Summary Uranium(VI) reacts with 1-[(5-methyl-2-pyridyl)azo]-2-naphthol (5-Me--PAN) in aqueous solution. The complex can be extracted with chloroform at pH 7.0–11.5 to give a red solution with an absorbance peak at 560 nm. The color is stable and the system conforms to Beer's law at the range of 1.5–8 ppm uranium in chloroform layer. Common anions and cations do not interfere. Large amounts of interfering cations can be masked by potassium cyanide, EDTA or triethanolamine. The proposed method is a selective procedure for the determination of uranium. The molar absorptivity in the chloroform extract is 2.1×10⁴ l mole^–1 cm^–1 at 560 nm.

---

Zusammenfassung Uran(VI) reagiert mit 1-[(5-Methyl-2-pyridyl)azo]-2-naphthol(5-Me--PAN) in wäßriger Lösung unter Bildung einer mit Chloroform bei pH 7,0–11,5 extrahierbaren, roten Komplexverbindung mit einem Absorptionsmaximum bei 560 nm. Die Färbung ist beständig und folgt dem Beerschen Gesetz zwischen 1,5 und 8 ppm Uran. Die üblichen Ionen stören nicht. Große Mengen störender Kationen können mit Kaliumcyanid, ÄDTA oder Triäthanolamin maskiert werden. Die vorgeschlagene Methode ist für die Uranbestimmung selektiv. Die molare Extinktion des Chloroformextraktes beträgt 2,1×10⁴ l·Mol·^–1 cm^–1 bei 560 nm.

     

A gas-jet system for the study of short-lived,light fission products

A selective method for the solvent extraction and spectrophotometric determination of uranium(VI) is described. Uranium can be extracted into chloroform at pH 6.0 with N-m-chlorophenyl-2-theno-hydroxamic acid (N-m-CPTHA) and determined by spectrophotometry using 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol (PAN). The molar absorptivity is 1.50·10⁴ 1·mol^–1·cm^–1 at 560 nm. The system obeys Beer's law within the range 0.95–20.00 ppm of uranium. Alternatively, a back-extraction procedure was also developed in which uranium is back-extracted by nitric acid and estimated spectrophotometrically using Arsenazo III. The molar absorptivity is 2.0·10⁴ 1·mol^–1·cm^–1 at 665 nm. The parameters concerning the optimum conditions for the analytical method are discussed. The proposed method is applied precisely for the determination of uranium in rock and sea water samples.