Studies on the reactions of bis(acetylacetonato)platinum(II) with lewis bases : IV. Preparations and characterization of novel acetylacetonato complexes [Pt(C5H6O2)L2]

Novel complexes [Pt(C₅H₆O₂)L₂] (IVa, L = PPh₃; IVb, L = PMePh₂, IVc, L = PMe₂Ph) were prepared by the reactions of [Pt(acac)₂] with tertiary phosphines either at elevated temperature (when L = PPh₃) or at room temperature (L = PMePh₂ and PMe₂Ph), whereas AsPh₃ yielded [Pt(acac)(γ-acac)AsPh₃] (Id) by the reaction with [Pt(acac)₂] even under rigorous conditions. Complexes IV were characterized on the basis of their IR and NMR spectra, elemental analyses and chemical reactions, and a structure which possesses a chelate type “acetylacetonato” ligand involving π-oxoallyl bonding is proposed.     

Synthesis,spectroscopic investigation,structural characterization,and DFT calculations of [ReX2(N2COPh)(CH3PhCN)(PPh3)2] (X=Cl,Br)

Reactions of [ReX₂(η ²-N₂COPh-N′,O)(PPh₃)₂] with 3-methylbenzonitrile give two iso-structural complexes, [ReX₂(N₂COPh)(CH₃PhCN)(PPh₃)₂] (X?=?Cl, Br). The crystal and molecular structures of [ReCl₂(N₂COPh)(CH₃PhCN)(PPh₃)₂] (1) and [ReBr₂(N₂COPh)(CH₃PhCN)(PPh₃)₂]?·?CH₂Cl₂ (2) were determined. The electronic structures were examined with density functional theory (DFT). The spin-allowed electronic transitions were calculated with the time-dependent DFT method, and the UV-Vis spectrum has been discussed.     

Synthesis and characterization of [Cu(Phca2en)(PPh3)X] (X=Cl, Br, I, NCS, N3) complexes: crystal structures of [Cu(Phca2en)(PPh3)Br] and [Cu(Phca2en)(PPh3)I]

New mixed-ligand copper(I) complexes, [Cu(Phca₂en)(PPh₃)X], [Phca₂en = N,N′-bis(β-phenylci-nnamaldehyde)-1,2-diiminoethane and X=Cl (1), Br (2), I (3), NCS (4), N₃ (5)] have been synthesized and characterized by various techniques. ¹H and ¹³C-NMR and IR spectral data of these copper(I) complexes are compared with the free ligand to elucidate some structural features. The structures of [Cu(Phca₂en)(PPh₃)Br] (2) and [Cu(Phca₂en)(PPh₃)I] (3) have been determined from single-crystal data showing that the coordination geometry around copper atom is a distorted tetrahedron. Furthermore, these Cu(I) complexes exhibit supramolecular motifs of the type multiple phenyl embraces resulting from attractive interactions between phenyl rings of PPh₃ moieties. The presence of the C–H…Cu weak intramolecular hydrogen bonds, due to the trapping of C–H bonds in the vicinity of the metal atoms, is also reported.     

The isolation of intermediates in hydrogen halide additions to some iridium complexes

The complexes [Ir(cod)L_n]PF₆(I, L = PPh₃, PMePh₂; n = 2. L = PMe₂Ph; n = 3) react with HX to give [IrHX(cod)L₂]PF₆ (II, L = PMePh₂ or PMe₂Ph) or [IrHX₂(cod)(PPh₃)] (III). The intermediates [IrX(cod)L₂] have, in two cases (L = PMePh₂, X = I, Br), been directly isolated from the reaction mixtures at 0°C, and are also formed from I with KX (L = PPh₃, X = Cl; L = PMePh₂, X = Cl, Br, I); these intermediates protonate to give II (L = PMePh₂), or an equimolar mixture of III and I (L = PPh₃, X = Cl). Surprisingly, I₂ reacts with I in MeOH to give III (L = PPh₃). The stereochemistries of II and III were determined by < ¹H NMR and especially by new methods using ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The complexes I exhibit a Lewis acid reactivity pattern.     

Transition metal chemistry of phosphorus based ligands. Ruthenium(II) chemistry of bis(phosphino)amines, X2PN(R)PX2 (R=H or Ph, X=Ph; R=Ph, X2=O2C6H4)

Reactions of CpRuCl(PPh₃)₂ with bis(phosphino)amines, X₂PN(R)PX₂ (1 R=H, X=Ph; 2 R=X=Ph; 3 R=Ph, X₂=O₂C₆H₄) give neutral or cationic mononuclear complexes depending on the reaction conditions. Reaction of 1 with CpRuCl(PPh₃)₂ gives one neutral complex, [CpRu(Cl)(η²-Ph₂PN(H)PPh₂)] (4) and two cationic complexes, [CpRu(η²-Ph₂PN(H)PPh₂)(η¹-Ph₂PN(H)PPh₂)]Cl (5) and [CpRu(PPh₃)(η²-Ph₂PN(H)PPh₂)]Cl (6), whereas the reaction of 2 with CpRuCl(PPh₃)₂ leads only to the isolation of cationic complex, [CpRu(PPh₃)(η²-Ph₂PN(Ph)PPh₂)]Cl (7). The catechol derivative 3, in a similar reaction, affords an interesting mononuclear complex [CpRu(PPh₃){η¹-(C₆H₄O₂)PN(Ph)P(O₂H₄C₆)}₂]Cl (8) containing two monodentate bis(phosphino)amine ligands. The structural elucidation of the complexes was carried out by elemental analyses, IR and NMR spectroscopic data.     

Schwefel(IV)-Verbindungen als Liganden: XIV. [(C5H5)Ru(dppm)(CH2=SO2)]+, ein starkes metallorganisches electrophil

Diazomethane converts [cpRu(dppm)(SO₂)]PF₆ into [cpRu(dppm)(CH₂=SO₂)]PF₆, the first example of a complex containing a side-on coordinated sulfene. This compound is a strong organometallic electrophile as shown by rapid addition reactions with anionic (Cl⁻, Br⁻, CN⁻, SCN⁻) and neutral (PMe₃, PPh₃, NMe₂Ph, MeOH, EtOH) nucleophiles.     

Reactions of Rhenium and Technetium Nitrido Complexes with ER3 Fragments (E = B,Ga, Al,C, P; R = H,Alkyl, Aryl)

Terminal ‘N^3—’ ligands in rhenium and technetium nitrido complexes are sufficiently nucleophilic to react with Lewis acids under formation of nitrido‐bridged compounds. The reactivity of the nucleophilic centre and the nature of the formed compounds are strongly dependent on the Lewis acid and the composition of the metal complex used. Air‐stable compounds with Re≡N‐ER₃ bridges are formed when ER₃ is BR₃ (R = H, Cl, Br, Ethyl, Phenyl, C₆F₅), BCl₂Ph, GaCl₃, CPh₃⁺, or PPh₃. The six‐co‐ordinate rhenium(V) complexes [ReNX₂(PMe₂Ph)₃] (X = Cl, Br), [ReN(X)(Et₂dtc)(PMe₂Ph)₂] (Et₂dtc^— = diethyldithiocarbamate) and [ReN(Et₂dtc)₂(PMe₂Ph)] have been proved to be excellent starting materials for this type of reactions, whereas the five‐co‐ordinate precursors [ReNCl₂(PPh₃)₂], [ReN(Et₂dtc)₂], [ReN{Ph₂P(S)NP(S)Ph₂}₂] or [ReNCl₄]^— only react with the most reactive Lewis bases of the examples mentioned above such as BCl₂Ph or B(C₆F₅)₃. The rhenium‐nitrido bond lengths remain almost unchanged by the adduct formation, whereas a significant decrease of the trans‐influence of the nitrido complexes has been observed as can be seen by a shortening of the corresponding bond lengths or dimerization of five‐co‐ordinate precursors. Electrophilic attack of the Lewis acid to a donor atom of the equatorial co‐ordination sphere of the rhenium complex results in the formation of ‘underco‐ordinate’ metal centres which resemble to di‐, tri or tetrameric units with asymmetric nitrido bridges between each two rhenium atoms. EPR spectroscopy is an excellent tool to reflect the formation of nitrido bridges at the paramagnetic (d¹) [ReNX₄]^— core (X = F, Cl, Br, NCS). The spectral parameters derived for the products of reactions of [ReNCl₄]^— with various boron compounds indicate an increase of the covalency of the equatorial Re‐L bonds as a consequence of the formation of a nitrido bridge. The tendency for the formation of nitrido bridges with Lewis acids is significantly lower for technetium compounds compared to their rhenium analogues. Only a few examples with BH₃ and BPhCl₂ have been established.     

Platinum(II) pyridine-2-thiolate and -selenolate complexes

The reaction of [Pt₂X₂(-Cl)₂(PR₃)₂] with NaSpy or NaSepy gave complexes of the type [PtX(Epy)(PR₃)]_n (X=Cl or Ar; E=S or Se; PR₃=PEt₃, PMe₂Ph, PMePh₂ or PPh₃; n=1 or 2) which were characterized by elemental analysis and by ¹H, ³¹P{¹H}, ¹⁹⁵Pt{¹H} n.m.r. spectroscopy. When X=Cl a dynamic equilibrium between [Pt₂Cl₂(-Spy)₂(PR₃)₂] and [PtCl(k-S,N-Spy)(PR₃)] species exists in CHCl₃ solution. The aryl derivatives, X=Ar, exist exclusively as dimers (n=2) with predominantly SN bridging. The [Pt(Spy)₂ (PPh₃)₂] complex, prepared by reacting [PtCl₂ (PPh₃)₂] with NaSpy, dissociates in CHCl₃ to [Pt(k-S,N-Spy) (Spy)(PPh₃)] and PPh₃ at room temperature.     

Synthesis, spectroscopy and structures of palladium(II) and platinum(II) complexes containing mercapto-o-carborane

The reactions of [M₂Cl₂(μ-Cl)₂(PMe₂Ph)₂] with mercapto-o-carboranes in the presence of pyridine afforded mono-nuclear complexes of composition, [MCl(SCb°R)(py)(PMe₂Ph)] (M = Pd or Pt; Cb° = o-C₂B₁₀H₁₀; R = H or Ph). The treatment of [PdCl₂(PEt₃)₂] with PhCb°SH yielded trans-[Pd(SCb°Ph)₂(PEt₃)₂] (4) which when left in solution in the presence of pyridine gave another substitution product, [Pd(SCb°Ph)₂(py)(PEt₃)] (5). The structures of [PdCl(SCb°Ph)(py)(PMe₂Ph)] (1), [Pd(SCb°Ph)₂(PEt₃)₂] (4) and [Pd(SCb^oPh)₂(py)(PEt₃)] (5) were established unambiguously by X-ray crystallography. The palladium atom in these complexes adopts a distorted square-planar configuration with neutral donor atoms occupying the trans positions. Thermolysis of [PdCl(SCb°)(py)(PMe₂Ph)] (2) in TOPO (trioctylphosphine oxide) at 200 °C gave nanocrystals of TOPO capped Pd₄S which were characterized by XRD pattern and SEM.     

Synthesis and spectroscopy of cis-configured mononuclear palladium(II) and platinum(II) complexes of chalcogeno o-carboranes and structures of [Pt(SCboPh)2(dppm)], [Pt(SeCboPh)2(dppm)], [Pt(SCboS)(PMe2Ph)2] and [Pt(SCboS)(PMePh2)2]

The reactions of [MCl₂(P^∩P)] and [MCl₂(PR₃)₂)] with 1-mercapto-2-phenyl-o-carborane/NaSeCb^oPh and 1,2-dimercapto-o-carborane yield mononuclear complexes of composition, [M(SCb^oPh)₂(P^∩P)], [M(SeCb^oPh)₂(P^∩P)] (M = Pd or Pt; P^∩P = dppm (bis(diphenylphosphino)methane), dppe (1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane) or dppp (1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane)) and [M(SCb^oS)(PR₃)₂] (2PR₃ = dppm, dppe, 2PEt₃, 2PMe₂Ph, 2PMePh₂ or 2PPh₃). These complexes have been characterized by elemental analysis and NMR (¹H, ³¹P, ⁷⁷Se and ¹⁹⁵Pt) spectroscopy. The ¹J(Pt–P) values and ¹⁹⁵Pt NMR chemical shifts are influenced by the nature of phosphine as well as thiolate ligand. Molecular structures of [Pt(SCb^oPh)₂(dppm)], [Pt(SeCb^oPh)₂(dppm)], [Pt(SCb^oS)(PMe₂Ph)₂] and [Pt(SCb^oS)(PMePh₂)₂] have been established by single crystal X-ray structural analyses. The platinum atom in all these complexes acquires a distorted square planar configuration defined by two cis-bound phosphine ligands and two chalcogenolate groups. The carborane rings are mutually anti in [Pt(SCb^oPh)₂(dppm)] and [Pt(SeCb^oPh)₂(dppm)].     

Synthesis and spectroscopy of cis-configured mononuclear palladium(II) and platinum(II) complexes of chalcogeno o-carboranes and structures of [Pt(SCboPh)2(dppm)], [Pt(SeCboPh)2(dppm)], [Pt(SCboS)(PMe2Ph)2] and [Pt(SCboS)(PMePh2)2]

The reactions of [MCl₂(P^∩P)] and [MCl₂(PR₃)₂)] with 1-mercapto-2-phenyl-o-carborane/NaSeCb^oPh and 1,2-dimercapto-o-carborane yield mononuclear complexes of composition, [M(SCb^oPh)₂(P^∩P)], [M(SeCb^oPh)₂(P^∩P)] (M = Pd or Pt; P^∩P = dppm (bis(diphenylphosphino)methane), dppe (1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane) or dppp (1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane)) and [M(SCb^oS)(PR₃)₂] (2PR₃ = dppm, dppe, 2PEt₃, 2PMe₂Ph, 2PMePh₂ or 2PPh₃). These complexes have been characterized by elemental analysis and NMR (¹H, ³¹P, ⁷⁷Se and ¹⁹⁵Pt) spectroscopy. The ¹J(Pt–P) values and ¹⁹⁵Pt NMR chemical shifts are influenced by the nature of phosphine as well as thiolate ligand. Molecular structures of [Pt(SCb^oPh)₂(dppm)], [Pt(SeCb^oPh)₂(dppm)], [Pt(SCb^oS)(PMe₂Ph)₂] and [Pt(SCb^oS)(PMePh₂)₂] have been established by single crystal X-ray structural analyses. The platinum atom in all these complexes acquires a distorted square planar configuration defined by two cis-bound phosphine ligands and two chalcogenolate groups. The carborane rings are mutually anti in [Pt(SCb^oPh)₂(dppm)] and [Pt(SeCb^oPh)₂(dppm)].     

Synthesis,structural characterization,oxygen sensitivity,and antimicrobial activity of ruthenium(II) carbonyl complexes with thiosemicarbazones

[Ru(CO)(PPh₃)₂(η³-O,N³,S-TSC¹)] (1), [Ru(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂(η²-N³,S-TSC²)] (2), and [Ru(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂(η²-N³,S-TSC³)] (3) have been prepared by reacting [Ru(H)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₃] with the respective thiosemicarbazones TSC¹ (2-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde thiosemicarbazone), TSC² (3-hydroxybenzaldehyde thiosemicarbazone), and TSC³ (3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde thiosemicarbazone) in a 1?:?1 M ratio in toluene and all of the complexes have been characterized by UV–vis, FT-IR, and ¹H and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy. The spectroscopic studies showed that TSC¹ is coordinated to the central metal as a tridendate ligand coordinating via the azomethine nitrogen (C=N), phenolic oxygen, and sulfur to ruthenium in 1, whereas TSC² and TSC³ are coordinated to ruthenium as a bidentate ligand through azomethine nitrogen (C=N) and sulfur in 2 and 3. Oxygen sensitivities of 1–3 and [Ru(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂(η²-N³,S-TSC⁴)] (4), and antimicrobial activities of 1–3 have been determined.     

Unusual Structure,Fluxionality, and Reaction Mechanism of Carbonyl Hydrosilylation by Silyl Hydride Complex [(ArN)Mo(H)(SiH2Ph)(PMe3)3]

The reactions of bis(borohydride) complexes [(RN?)Mo(BH₄)₂(PMe₃)₂] ( 4 : R=2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃; 5 : R=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃) with hydrosilanes afford new silyl hydride derivatives [(RN?)Mo(H)(SiR′₃)(PMe₃)₃] ( 3 : R=Ar, R′₃=H₂Ph; 8 : R=Ar′, R′₃=H₂Ph; 9 : R=Ar, R′₃=(OEt)₃; 10 : R=Ar, R′₃=HMePh). These compounds can also be conveniently prepared by reacting [(RN?)Mo(H)(Cl)(PMe₃)₃] with one equivalent of LiBH₄ in the presence of a silane. Complex 3 undergoes intramolecular and intermolecular phosphine exchange, as well as exchange between the silyl ligand and the free silane. Kinetic and DFT studies show that the intermolecular phosphine exchange occurs through the predissociation of a PMe₃ group, which, surprisingly, is facilitated by the silane. The intramolecular exchange proceeds through a new non‐Bailar‐twist pathway. The silyl/silane exchange proceeds through an unusual Mo^VI intermediate, [(ArN?)Mo(H)₂(SiH₂Ph)₂(PMe₃)₂] ( 19 ). Complex 3 was found to be the catalyst of a variety of hydrosilylation reactions of carbonyl compounds (aldehydes and ketones) and nitriles, as well as of silane alcoholysis. Stoichiometric mechanistic studies of the hydrosilylation of acetone, supported by DFT calculations, suggest the operation of an unexpected mechanism, in that the silyl ligand of compound 3 plays an unusual role as a spectator ligand. The addition of acetone to compound 3 leads to the formation of [trans‐(ArN)Mo(OiPr)(SiH₂Ph)(PMe₃)₂] ( 18 ). This latter species does not undergo the elimination of a Si? O group (which corresponds to the conventional Ojima′s mechanism of hydrosilylation). Rather, complex 18 undergoes unusual reversible β‐CH activation of the isopropoxy ligand. In the hydrosilylation of benzaldehyde, the reaction proceeds through the formation of a new intermediate bis(benzaldehyde) adduct, [(ArN?)Mo(η²‐PhC(O)H)₂(PMe₃)], which reacts further with hydrosilane through a η¹‐silane complex, as studied by DFT calculations.     

Some trimethyl phosphine and trimethyl phosphite complexes of tungsten(IV)

Direct reduction of WCl₆ with PMe₃ in toluene at 120°C in a sealed tube affords the complexes [WCl₄(PMe₃)_x] (x = 2, 3). [WCl₄(PMe₃)₃] abstracts oxygen from equimolar amounts of water in wet acetone or tetrahydrofuran to give [WOCl₂(PMe₃)₃] in very high yields. This procedure has been successfully applied to the high yield synthesis of other known oxotungsten(IV) complexes, [WOCl₂(PR₃)₃] (PR₃ = PMe₂Ph and PMePh₂). Metathesis reactions of [WOCl₂(PMe₃)₃] with NaX give [WOX₂(PMe₃)₃] (X = NCO, NCS) and [WOX₂(PMe₃)] (X = Me₂NCS₂). The synthesis of the trimethylphosphite analogue, [WOCl₂(P(OMe)₃)₃], is also described and the structures of the new complexes assigned on the basis of IR and ¹H and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy.     

Platinum,iridium and rhodium complexes with substituted bis-(diphenylphosphino)methane ligands Ph2PCH(R)PPh2 (R = Me,Ph or SiMe3)

Substituted phosphines of the type Ph₂PCH(R)PPh₂ and their Pt^II complexes [PtX₂{Ph₂PCH(R)PPh₂}] (R = Me, Ph or SiMe₃; X = halide) were prepared. Treatment of [PtCl₂(NCBu^t)₂] with Ph₂PCH(SiMe₃)-PPh₂ gave [PtCl₂(Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)], while treatment with Ph₂PCH(Ph)PPh₂ gave [Pt{Ph₂PCH(Ph)PPh₂}₂]Cl₂. Reaction of p-MeC₆H₄C≡CLi or PhC≡CLi with [PtX₂{Ph₂PCH(Me)PPh₂}] gave [Pt(C≡CC₆H₄Me-p)₂-{Ph₂PCH(Me)PPh₂}] (X = I) and [Pt{Ph₂PC(Me)PPh₂}₂](X = Cl),while reaction of p-MeC₆H₄C≡CLi with [Pt{Ph₂PCH(Ph)PPh₂}₂]Cl₂ gave [Pt{Ph₂PC(Ph)PPh₂}₂]. The platinum complexes [PtMe₂(dpmMe)] or [Pt(CH₂)₄(dpmMe)] fail to undergo ring-opening on treatment with one equivalent of dpmMe [dpmMe = Ph₂PCH(Me)PPh₂]. Treatment of [Ir(CO)Cl(PPh₃)₂] with two equivalents of dpmMe gave [Ir(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl. The PF₆ salt was also prepared. Treatment of [Ir(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl with [Cu(C≡CPh)₂], [AgCl(PPh₃)] or [AuCl(PPh₃)] failed to give heterobimetallic complexes. Attempts to prepare the dinuclear rhodium complex [Rh₂(CO)₃(μ-Cl)(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄ using a procedure similar to that employed for an analogous dpm (dpm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) complex were unsuccessful. Instead, the mononuclear complex [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄ was obtained. The corresponding chloride and PF₆ salts were also prepared. Attempts to prepare [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl in CHCl₃ gave [RhHCl(dpmMe)₂]Cl. Recrystallization of [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄ from CHCl₃/EtOH gave [RhO₂(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄. Treatment of [Rh(CO)₂Cl₂]₂ with one equivalent of dpmMe per Rh atom gave two compounds, [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl and a dinuclear complex that undergoes exchange at room temperature between two formulae: [Rh₂(CO)₂(μ-Cl)(μ-CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl and [Rh₂(CO)₂-(μ-Cl)(dpmMe)₂]Cl. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Synthesis,structural characterisation and reactivity of molybdenum half-sandwich complexes containing keto- and amido-phosphines

The keto-functionalised N-pyrrolyl phosphine ligand PPh₂NC₄H₃{C(O)CH₃-2} L¹ reacts with [MoCl(CO)₃(η⁵-C₅R₅)] (R=H, Me) to give [MoCl(CO)₂(L¹-κ¹P)(η⁵-C₅R₅)] (R=H 1a; Me 1b). The phosphine ligands PPh₂CH₂C(O)Ph (L²) and PPh₂CH₂C(O)NPh₂ (L³) react with [MoCl(CO)₃(η⁵-C₅R₅)] in an analogous manner to give the compounds [MoCl(CO)₂(L-κ¹P)(η⁵-C₅R₅)] (L=L², R=H 2a, Me 2b; L=L³, R=H 3a, Me 3b). Compounds 1–3 react with AgBF₄ to give [Mo(CO)₂(L-κ²P,O)(η⁵-C₅R₅)]BF₄ (L=L¹, R=H 4a, Me 4b; L=L², R=H 5a, Me 5b; L=L³, R=H 6a, Me 6b) following displacement of chloride. The X-ray crystal structure of 4a revealed a lengthening of both Mo–P and CO bonds on co-ordination of the keto group. The lability of the co-ordinated keto or amido group has been assessed by addition of a range of phosphines to compounds 4–6. Compound 4a reacts with PMe₃, PMe₂Ph and PMePh₂ to give [Mo(CO)₂(L¹-κ¹P)(L)(η⁵-C₅H₅)]BF₄ (L=PMe₃ 7a; PMe₂Ph 7b; PMePh₂ 7c) but does not react with PPh₃, 5a reacts with PMe₂Ph, PMePh₂ and PPh₃ to give [Mo(CO)₂(L²-κ¹P)(L)(η⁵-C₅H₅)]BF₄ (L=PMe₂Ph 8b; PMePh₂ 8c; PPh₃ 8d), and 6a reacts with PMe₃, PMe₂Ph, PMePh₂ and PPh₃ to give [Mo(CO)₂(L³-κ¹P)(L)(η⁵-C₅H₅)]BF₄ (L=PMe₃ 10a; PMe₂Ph 10b; PMePh₂ 10c; PPh₃ 10d). No reaction was observed for the pentamethylcyclopentadienyl compounds 4b–6b with PMe₃, PMe₂Ph, PMePh₂ or PPh₃. These results are consistent with the displacement of the co-ordinated oxygen atom being influenced by the steric properties of the P,O-ligand, with PPh₃ displacing the keto group from L² but not from the bulkier L¹. In the reaction of [Mo(CO)₂(L²-κ²P,O)(η⁵-C₅H₅)]BF₄ (5a) with PMe₃ the phosphine does not displace the keto group, instead it acts as a base, with the only observed molybdenum-containing product being the enolate compound [Mo(CO)₂{PPh₂CHC(O)Ph-κ²P,O}(η⁵-C₅H₅)] 9. Compound 9 can also be formed from the reaction of 2a with BuLi or NEt₃, and a single crystal X-ray analysis has confirmed the enolate structure.     

Reactions of [ReOX3(PPh3)2] Complexes (X = Cl,Br) with Phenylacetylene and the Structures of the Products

Oxorhenium(V) complexes [ReOX₃(PPh₃)₂] (X = Cl, Br) react with phenylacetylene under formation of complexes with ylide‐type ligands. Compounds of the compositions [ReOCl₃(PPh₃){C(Ph)C(H)(PPh₃)}] ( 1 ), [ReOBr₃(OPPh₃){C(Ph)C(H)(PPh₃)}] ( 2 ), and [ReOBr₃(OPPh₃){C(H)C(Ph)(PPh₃)}] ( 3 ) were isolated and characterized by X‐ray diffraction. They contain a ligand, which was formed by a nucleophilic attack of released PPh₃ at coordinated phenylacetylene. The structures of the products show that there is no preferable position for this attack. Cleavage of the Re–C bond in 3 and dimerization of the organic ligand resulted in the formation of the [{(PPh₃)(H)CC(Ph)}₂]²⁺ cation, which crystallized as its [(ReOBr₄)(OReO₃)]^2– salt.     

The influence of the steric properties of the ligands PR2Ph and L on the formation and properties of the complexes Mo(η6-PhPR2)(L)(PPh2CH2CH2PPh2), R = Et,L = PPhEt2 and R = Ph,L = PPh3, PR′3, CO,CNR, N2, H2

The reduction of MoCl₄(DPPE) (DPPE = PPh₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂) with Mg or Na/Hg in the presence of 2 PPhR₂ under Ar results in the formation of the new complexes Mo(η⁶-PhPR₂)(PPhR₂)(DPPE) when R is Ph (Ia) or Et(II). No η⁶-PhPR₂ complex is obtained when R is Me because this small ligand forms strong MoP σ-bonds; nor is one obtained for R = Cy because of too much steric crowding. The limits for η⁶-complexation can be quantified in terms of cone angle sums.Complex Ia is very similar to Mo(η⁶-PhPMePh)(PMePh₂)₃ (IIIa) in that both react at similar rates with a variety of small ligands L = PMePh₂, PMe₂Ph, PMe₃, P(OMe)₃, N₂, CO, CNBu^t and H₂ via dissociation of a labile σ-bonded ligand. Several other less crowded η⁶-arylphosphinemolybdenum complexes including II do not have labile ligands at 25°C. The new complexes Mo(η⁶-PhPPh₂)(L)(DPPE) have been characterized by ³¹P and ¹H NMR, IR and gas uptake measurements, Ia has a higher affinity for H₂ than IIIa possibly because Mo(η⁶-PhPPh₂)(H)₂(DPPE) adopts a non-fluxional trans-configuration. The ³¹P chemical shift of the σ-bonded ligand in 8 derivatives of Ia and 12 of IIIa correlate with the sum of the cone angles of the three σ-bonded ligands in each complex.     

Complexes of cis -dihalogenorhenium(V) with iminophenol

Complexes cis-[ReOX₂(msa)(PPh₃)]?[X?=?Cl(1), I(2)] were prepared from trans-[ReOCl₃(PPh₃)₂] or trans-[ReOI₂(OEt)(PPh₃)²] with 2-(1-iminoethyl)phenol (Hmsa) in acetonitrile. An X-ray crystallographic study shows that the bonding distances and angles in 1 and 2 are nearly identical, and that the two halides in each complex are coordinated cis to each other in the equatorial plane cis to the oxo group. Rhenium(V) complexes with cis diiodides are rare. All bonding distances and angles are in the expected ranges.