Synthesis and structural characterization of new multiferrocenyl diyne ligands and their cobalt carbonyl complexes

New multiferrocenyl diyne ligands FcC(CH₃)₂Fc′–C≡C–C≡C–Fc [L ₁ ; Fc?=?C₅H₅FeC₅H₄; Fc′?=?C₅H₅Fe(1,3-disubstituted)C₅H₃], FcC(CH₃)₂Fc′–C≡C–C≡C–Fc′C(CH₃)₂Fc (L ₂ ) and their complexes [FcC(CH₃)₂Fc′–C≡C–C≡C–Fc][Co₂(CO)₆] _n [n?=?1, (1); n?=?2, (2)], [FcC(CH₃)₂Fc′–C≡C–C≡C–Fc′C(CH₃)₂Fc][Co₂(CO)₆] _n [n?=?1, (3); n?=?2, (4)] have been synthesized by the coupling reaction of terminal ferrocenylacetylene and the reaction of ligands L₁ and L₂ with Co₂(CO)₈. The composition and molecular structure of the ligands L₁ , L₂ and their cobalt complexes were characterized by element analysis, IR, ¹H(¹³C)NMR and MS. The electrochemical properties of compounds L₁ , L₂ , 1, 2, 3, 4 were studied by cyclic voltammetry(CV). The results of the electrochemical research reveal that all three ferrocenyl groups in L₁ become redox active centers, but there are only two (not four) ferrocenyl redox active centers in L₂ .     

Synthesis,molecular structure and reactivity of new biferrocenylpropane derivatives

New biferrocenylpropane derivatives FcC(CH₃)₂Fc′-C≡C–R [Fc?=?C₅H₅FeC₅H₄; Fc′?=?C₅H₅FeC₅H₃, R?=?C₆H₅ (L ₁ ), Fc (L ₂ )] and their complexes [FcC(CH₃)₂Fc′-C≡C–R][Co₂(CO)₆] [R?=?C₆H₅ (1); R?=?Fc (2)] have been synthesized by the Castro-Stephens coupling reaction and the reactions of ligands L ₁ , L ₂ with Co₂(CO)₈. Compounds L ₁ , L ₂ , 1 and 2 were characterized by elemental analysis, IR, ¹H (¹³C) NMR and MS, and the molecular structures of ligands L ₁ , L ₂ were determined by X-ray single crystal analysis. The electrochemical properties of L ₁ , L ₂ , 1 and 2 demonstrate two or three resolved one-electron redox processes.     

Syntheses,structures and catalytic activity for Friedel-Crafts reactions of substituted indenyl rhenium carbonyl complexes

The complexes [(η⁵-C₉H₆R)Re(CO)₃] [R = ⁿBu (8), ^tBu (9), CH(CH₂)₄ (10), Ph (11), Bz (12), 4-methoxyphenyl (13), 4-chlorophenyl (14)] were synthesized by refluxing substituted indenyl ligands [C₉H₇R] [R = ⁿBu (1), ^tBu (2), CH(CH₂)₄ (3), Ph (4), Bz (5), 4-methoxyphenyl (6), 4-chlorophenyl (7)], and Re₂(CO)₁₀ in decalin. The molecular structures of 9, 10, 12, and 13 were determined by X-ray diffraction analysis. These four crystals have similar molecular structures of the mononuclear carbonyl complex. In each of these molecules, Re is η⁵-coordinated to the five-membered ring of the indenyl group. Complexes 8–14 have catalytic activity for Friedel-Crafts reactions of aromatic compounds with a variety of alkylation and acylation reagents. Compared with traditional catalysts, these mononuclear metal carbonyl complexes have obvious advantages such as high activities, mild reaction conditions, high selectivity, and environmentally friendly chemistry.     

Synthesis and spectral properties of novel iminophosphoranes

Three new iminophosphoranes coded as FPZ1 (Ph–C≡C–C₆H₄–N = PPh₃), FPZ2 (Ph–N = P(C₆H₄–C≡C–Ph)₃) and FPZ3 (Ph–C≡C–C₆H₄–N = P(C₆H₄–C≡C–Ph)₃) were designed and synthesized by introducing different numbers of phenylene acetylene units to FPZ0 (Ph–N = PPh₃). The effect of structural modification was studied in detail analyzing the absorption spectra, the emission spectra, and the distributions of the electron density. The absorption spectra of the new iminophosphoranes are shown to be a linear combination of the spectra of each part by the artificial combinatorial absorption spectrum, which coincides with the real one. Most probably the individual parts can’t conjugate due to the tetrahedral structure. The probably formed excimer of FPZ0 and FPZ1 causes in their solid emission spectra an obvious bathochromic shift as compared to that of FPZ2 and FPZ3. The melting point data also showed that long branches of FPZ2 and FPZ3 will attenuate the interactions between the molecules. The results of quantum chemical calculations show that the electronic density in the HOMO of FPZ1, FPZ2, and FPZ3 is delocalized over the iminoaryl moieties. The electron density in the LUMO is delocalized over the triaryl phosphine moieties, but only concentrated on two branches, which directly determines the main direction of intramolecular charge transfer.     

Syntheses and molecular structures of new ferrocenylacetylide-bridged binuclear cobalt carbonyl cluster compounds

The reaction of ferrocenylacetylide compounds with Co₂(CO)₈ at room temperature affords four complexes bearing ferrocenyl units with approximately tetrahedral (μ-alkyne)dicobalt moieties [R–(C≡C) _n –R′] [Co₂(CO)₆] _{n ′} [R?=?C₅H₅FeC₅H₄-C(CH₃)₂-C₅H₄FeC₅H₄, R′?=?H, n?=?1, n′?=?1 (1); R?=?C₅H₅FeC₅H₄ [ferrocenyl (Fc)], R′?=?–CH=CHCl, n?=?1, n′?=?1 (2); R?=?Fc, R′?=?Fc, n?=?2, n′?=?1 (3), n′?=?2 (4)]. The compounds were characterized by elemental analysis, IR, ¹H(¹³C) NMR, MS and single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. The X-ray analyses show that coordination of the carbon–carbon triple bond and the dicobalt unit result in the formation of a Co₂C₂ tetrahedral core, and the substituents on the acetylenic units show a distortion from linearity that reflects this coordination mode.     

Molecular structure and electrochemistry of carbon-bridged diferrocenyl compounds

Four diferrocenyl compounds: FcC(CH₃)₂Fc (1), Fc(CH₃)C(C₂H₅)Fc (2), Fc(CH₃)C(C₃H₇)Fc (3), and Fc(CH₃)C(C₆H₅)Fc (4) were synthesized and characterized by NMR, FT-IR, MS, and elemental analysis. The molecular structures were determined by using X-ray single crystal diffraction. The electrochemical interactions between two ferrocenyl units in these compounds were investigated by cyclic voltammetry and theoretical calculation. The electron density of bridging carbon was a key factor for the separation of two ferrocenyl units.     

Transition‐Metal Complexes Based on the 1,3,5‐Triethynyl Benzene Linking Unit

The synthesis of a unique series of heteromultinuclear transition metal compounds is reported. Complexes 1‐I‐3‐Br‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 4 ), 1‐Br‐3‐(bpy‐C≡C)‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 6 ), 1,3‐(bpy‐C≡C)₂‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 7 ), 1‐(XC≡C)‐3‐(bpy‐C≡C)‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 8 , X = SiMe₃; 9 , X = H), 1‐(HC≡C)‐3‐[(CO)₃ClRe(bpy‐C≡C)]‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 11 ), 1‐[(Ph₃P)AuC≡C]‐3‐[(CO)₃ClRe(bpy‐C≡C)]‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 13 ), 1‐[(Ph₃P)AuC≡C]‐3‐(bpy‐C≡C)‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃ ( 14 ), [1‐[(Ph₃PAuC≡C]‐3‐[{[Ti](C≡CSiMe₃)₂}Cu(bpy‐C≡C)]‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃]PF₆ ( 16 ), and [1,3‐[(tBu₂bpy)₂Ru(bpy‐C≡C)]₂‐5‐(FcC≡C)‐C₆H₃](PF₆)₄ ( 18 ) (Fc = (η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Fe, bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridiyl‐5‐yl, [Ti] = (η⁵‐C₅H₄SiMe₃)₂Ti) were prepared by using consecutive synthesis methodologies including metathesis, desilylation, dehydrohalogenation, and carbon–carbon cross‐coupling reactions. In these complexes the corresponding metal atoms are connected by carbon‐rich bridging units comprising 1,3‐diethynyl‐, 1,3,5‐triethynylbenzene and bipyridyl units. They were characterized by elemental analysis, IR and NMR spectroscopy, and partly by ESI‐TOF mass spectrometry., The structures of 4 and 11 in the solid state are reported. Both molecules are characterized by the central benzene core bridging the individual transition metal complex fragments. The corresponding acetylide entities are, as typical, found in a linear arrangement with representative M–C, C–C_C≡C and C≡C bond lengths.     

Diversification of ortho‐Fused Cycloocta‐2,5‐dien‐1‐one Cores and Eight‐ to Six‐Ring Conversion by σ Bond C−C Cleavage

Sequential treatment of 2‐C₆H₄Br(CHO) with LiC≡CR¹ (R¹=SiMe₃, tBu), nBuLi, CuBr?SMe₂ and HC≡CCHClR² [R²=Ph, 4‐CF₃Ph, 3‐CNPh, 4‐(MeO₂C)Ph] at ?50 °C leads to formation of an intermediate carbanion (Z)‐1,2‐C₆H₄{C_A(=O)C≡C_BR¹}{CH=CH(CH^?)R²} ( 4 ). Low temperatures (?50 °C) favour attack at C_B leading to kinetic formation of 6,8‐bicycles containing non‐classical C‐carbanion enolates ( 5 ). Higher temperatures (?10 °C to ambient) and electron‐deficient R² favour retro σ‐bond C?C cleavage regenerating 4 , which subsequently closes on C_A providing 6,6‐bicyclic alkoxides ( 6 ). Computational modelling (CBS‐QB3) indicated that both pathways are viable and of similar energies. Reaction of 6 with H⁺ gave 1,2‐dihydronaphthalen‐1‐ols, or under dehydrating conditions, 2‐aryl‐1‐alkynylnaphthlenes. Enolates 5 react in situ with: H₂O, D₂O, I₂, allylbromide, S₂Me₂, CO₂ and lead to the expected C ‐E derivatives (E=H, D, I, allyl, SMe, CO₂H) in 49–64 % yield directly from intermediate 5 . The parents (E=H; R¹=SiMe₃, tBu; R²=Ph) are versatile starting materials for NaBH₄ and Grignard C=O additions, desilylation (when R¹=SiMe) and oxime formation. The latter allows formation of 6,9‐bicyclics via Beckmann rearrangement. The 6,8‐ring iodides are suitable Suzuki precursors for Pd‐catalysed C?C coupling (81–87 %), whereas the carboxylic acids readily form amides under T3P® conditions (71–95 %).     

Syntheses,crystal structures and biological activity of the dialkytin complexes based on 2-oxo-3-phenylpropionic acid salicyloylhydrazone

Three new dialkytin complexes, {[o-OH–C₆H₄(O)C=N–N=C(CH₂Ph)COO](n-Bu₂Sn)}_n (1), {[o-OH–C₆H₄(O)C=N–N=C(CH₂Ph)COO](MeOH)(p-MeC₆H₅CH₂)₂Sn}₂ (2), and {[o-OH–C₆H₄(O)C=N–N=C(CH₂Ph)COO](EtOH)(C₆H₅CH₂)₂Sn}₂ (3), were synthesized by reactions of 2-oxo-3-phenylpropionic acid salicyloylhydrazone with the corresponding diorganotin(IV) complex, respectively. All the complexes were characterized by IR, ¹H, ¹³C, ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectra, elemental analysis, X-ray single crystal diffraction and TGA. For in vitro antitumor activities, complexes were evaluated by the MTT assay against three human cancer cell lines (NCI-H460, HepG2 and MCF7) and human cell line (HL7702). The results showed that 1 may be a better potential candidate for further chemical optimization and cancer therapy than 2 and 3. The interactions between the complexes and calf thymus DNA were studied; the interaction of 1 with calf thymus DNA was intercalation, 2 and 3 were intercalation and electrostatic binding.     

Reactivity of an N,N‐Chelated Germylene Toward Substituted Alkynes,Alkenes, and Allenes

Treatment of N,N‐chelated germylene [(iPr)₂NB(N‐2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃)₂]Ge ( 1 ) with ferrocenyl alkynes containing carbonyl functionalities, FcC≡CC(O)R, resulted in [2+2+2] cyclization and formation of the respective ferrocenylated 3‐Fc‐4‐C(O)R‐1,2‐digermacyclobut‐3‐enes 2 – 4 [R = Me ( 2 ), OEt ( 3 ) and NMe₂ ( 4 )] bearing intact carbonyl substituents. In contrast, the reaction between 1 and PhC(O)C≡CC(O)Ph led to activation of both C≡C and C=O bonds producing bicyclic compound containing two five‐membered 1‐germa‐2‐oxacyclopent‐3‐ene rings sharing one C–C bond, 4,8‐diphenyl‐3,7‐dioxa‐2,6‐digermabicyclo[3.3.0]octa‐4,8‐diene ( 5 ). With N‐methylmaleimide containing an analogous C(O)CH=CHC(O) fragment, germylene 1 reacted under [2+2+2] cyclization involving the C=C double bond, producing 1,2‐digermacyclobutane 6 with unchanged carbonyl moieties. Finally, 1 selectively added to the terminal double bond in allenes CH₂=C=CRR′ giving rise to 3‐(=CRR′)‐1,2‐digermacyclobutanes [R/R′ = Me/Me ( 7 ), H/OMe ( 8 )] bearing an exo‐C=C double bond. All compounds were characterized by ¹H, ¹³C{¹H} NMR, IR and Raman spectroscopy and the molecular structures of 3 , 4 , 5 , and 8 were established by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. The redox behavior of ferrocenylated derivatives 2 – 4 was studied by cyclic voltammetry.     

Syntheses,spectroscopy, and X-ray structures of 3-{(R)-(Ar)-ethylimino}-1,3-dihydro-indol-2-one (Ar = Ph,MeOC6H4, BrC6H4, 1-naphthyl) and [Rh(η4-cod){3-((R)-(Ar)-ethylimino)-3H-indol-2-olato}]

Condensation of 1H-indole-2,3-dione (isatin) with (R)-(Ar)-ethylamines gives enantiopure Schiff bases, 3-{(R)-(Ar)-ethylimino}-1,3-dihydro-indol-2-one (HL) {Ar?=?Ph (HL1), 2-MeOC₆H₄ (HL2), 4-MeOC₆H₄ (HL3), 4-BrC₆H₄ (HL4), and 1-naphthyl (HL5)}. The Schiff bases readily coordinate to [Rh(μ-O₂CMe)(η⁴-cod)]₂ (cod?=?1,5-cyclooctadiene) to give mononuclear [Rh(η⁴-cod){3-((R)-(Ar)-ethylimino)-3H-indol-2-olato}] {Ar?=?Ph (1), 4-MeOC₆H₄ (2), and 4-BrC₆H₄ (3)}, respectively. The Schiff bases and complexes have been fully characterized by IR, UV-Vis, ¹H-NMR, mass, and circular dichroism (CD) spectrometry. Polarimetry and CD measurements show the enantiopurity of the Schiff bases as well as the complexes. ¹H NMR measurements reveal slow conversion of the lactam to the enol form of the Schiff bases in solution. In the solid state the lactam form dominates as shown by crystal structures of HL1 and HL4. While gross structural features of both are similar, the molecules differ significantly in the relative orientations of the aryl and lactam rings. The difference is mostly rotation about the N2–C9 bond with different C8–N2–C9–C11 torsion angle of +89.77(12)° for HL1 and C2–N2–C9–C11 of +106.8(3)° for HL4.     

Substituted Ferrocenylboranes – Potential Ligand Precursors for ansa‐ Metallocenes,Constrained Geometry Complexes and ansa‐Diamido Complexes

A wide range of potential ligand precursors and related compounds have been synthesized from ferrocenyldibromoborane and ferrocenylenebis(dibromoborane) via salt elimination reactions. These comprise ligand precursors suitable for the preparation of (i) ansa‐metallocenes such as [FcB(η¹‐C₅H₅)₂] ( 2 ), [FcB(1‐C₉H₇)₂] ( 3 ), [FcB(3‐C₉H₇)₂] ( 4 ) and [1,1′‐fc{B(3‐C₉H₇)₂}₂] ( 11 ), (ii) constrained geometry complexes such as [FcB(1‐C₉H₇)N(H)Ph] ( 7 ) and [FcB(3‐C₉H₇)N(H)Ph] ( 8 ), (iii) ansa‐diamido complexes such as [FcB(N(H)Ph)₂] ( 9 ) as well as (iv) the related compounds [FcB(Br)N(H)tBu] ( 5 ), [FcB(Br)N(H)Ph] ( 6 ), [1,1′‐fc{B(Br)N(SiMe₃)₂}₂] ( 12 ) and [1,1′‐fc{B(Br)NiPr₂}₂] ( 13 ) (Fc = ferrocenyl, fc = ferrocenylene, C₅H₅ = cyclopentadienyl, C₉H₇ = indenyl). All new compounds have been characterised by multinuclear NMR spectroscopic techniques and in the case of 7 and 12 by X‐ray diffraction methods.     

Cyclopentadienyl, indenyl, and fluorenyl complexes of sodium with 15-crown-5

The sodium complexes [NaC₅H₅(15-crown-5)] (1a), [NaC₉H₇(15-crown-5)] (1b), and [NaC₁₃H₉(15-crown-5)] (1c, C₅H₅=cyclopentadienyl, C₉H₇=indenyl, C₁₃H₉=fluorenyl) were synthesized from NaC₅H₅, NaC₉H₇, NaC₁₃H₉, and 15-crown-5. Single crystal X-ray diffraction analyses were carried out for all three compounds 1a, 1b, 1c, and show that monomeric units were present in the solid state with the organic aromatic anion coordinated to the sodium cation via the five-membered ring.     

Syntheses and Structures of trans-bis(Alkenylacetylide) Ruthenium Complexes

A series of ruthenium alkenylacetylide complexes trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}Cl(dppe)₂] (R=Ph ( 1 a ), ^cC₄H₃S ( 1 b ), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ( 1 c ), 3,3-dimethyl-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b]thiophene (DMBT) ( 1 d )) or trans-[Ru{C≡C-^cC₆H₉}Cl(dppe)₂] ( 1 e ) were allowed to react with the corresponding propargylic alcohol HC≡CC(Me)R(OH) (R=Ph ( A ), ^cC₄H₃S ( B ), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ( C ), DMBT ( D ) or HC≡C-^cC₆H₁₀(OH) ( E ) in the presence of TlBF₄ and DBU to presumably give alkenylacetylide/allenylidene intermediates trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}{C=C=C(Me)}(dppe)₂]PF₆ ([ 2 ]PF₆). These complexes were not isolated but deprotonated to give the isolable bis(alkenylacetylide) complexes trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}₂(dppe)₂] (R=Ph ( 3 a ), ^cC₄H₃S ( 3 b ), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ( 3 c ), DMBT ( 3 d )) and trans-[Ru{C≡C-^cC₆H₉}₂(dppe)₂] ( 3 e ). Analogous reactions of trans-[Ru(CH₃)₂(dmpe)₂], featuring the more electron-donating 1,2-bis(dimethylphosphino)ethane (dmpe) ancillary ligands, with the propargylic alcohols A or C and NH₄PF₆ in methanol allowed isolation of the intermediate mixed alkenylacetylide/allenylidene complexes trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}{C=C=C(Me)}(dmpe)₂]PF₆ (R=Ph ([ 4 a ]PF₆), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ([ 4 c ]PF₆). Deprotonation of [ 4 a ]PF₆ or [ 4 c ]PF₆ gave the symmetric bis(alkenylacetylide) complexes trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}₂(dmpe)₂] (R=Ph ( 5 a ), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ( 5 c )), the first of their kind containing the dmpe ancillary ligand sphere. Attempts to isolate bis(allenylidene) complexes [Ru{C=C=C(Me)R}₂(PP)₂]²⁺ (PP=dppe, dmpe) from treatment of the bis(alkenylacetylide) species 3 or 5 with HBF₄ ⋅ Et₂O were ultimately unsuccessful.     

New aryl ethynylene substituted silicon-centered molecules

The reactions of substituted dichlorosilane monomers,Cl₂SiRR′, with two equivalents of lithium aryl acetylide(1), LiC ≡ C-4-C₆H₄-Ph, afford RR′Si(C ≡ C-4-C₆H₄-Ph)₂ (6: R,R′ =CH₃; 7: R = CH₃, R′ = CH=CH₂; 8: R,R′ = Ph). An isomeric mixture of meso, (R,R)- and (S,S)-Bis[2-(N,N-dimethylaminomethyl)ferrocenyl]dichlorosilane (5) was used as starting chlorosilyl compound for reaction with LiC ≡ C-4-C₆H₄-Ph to give (FcN)₂Si(C ≡ C-4-C₆H₄-Ph)₂ (9). A detailedcharacterization of 6, 7, 8 and 9 has been carried out by ¹H-NMR, ¹³C-NMR, ²⁹Si-NMR, IR and UV-VIS spectroscopy. The crystal structure of 9 has been determined by X-ray diffraction analysis.     

New homo- and heteroleptic derivatives of trivalent ytterbium containing radical anion 1,4-diazadiene ligands. Synthesis, properties, and crystal structures of the complexes (C9H7)2Yb[2-MeC6H4NC(Me)C(Me)NC6H4Me-2] and [PhNC(Ph)C(Ph)NPh]3Yb

The interaction of the ytterbium bis(indenyl) complex (C₉H₇)₂Yb^II(THF)₂ (1) with the 1,4-diazabutadiene 2-MeC₆H₄N=C(Me)-C(Me)=NC₆H₄Me-2 (^MeDAD) is accompanied by the oxidation of the metal atom to the trivalent state and results in a paramagnetic compound of the metallocene type (C₉H₇)₂Yb^III(^MeDAD^−·) (3) containing the radical anion of 1,4-diazabutadiene. The structure of the complex 3 was determined by X-ray diffraction analysis. The reactions of the bis(indenyl) (1) and bis(fluorenyl) (C₁₃H₉)₂Yb^II(THF)₂ (2) derivatives of divalent ytterbium with the 1,4-diazabutadiene PhN=C(Ph)-C(Ph)=NPh (^PhDAD) (with the molar ratio of the reactants 1:2) proceed with a complete cleavage of the bonds Yb-C and the oxidation of the ytterbium atom to the trivalent state and result in a homoligand complex (^PhDAD^−·)₃Yb (6) containing three radical anion 1,4-diazadiene ligands. Complex 6 was also obtained by an exchange reaction of YbCl₃ with ^PhDAD^−·K⁺ (1: 3) in THF. Complex 6 was characterized by X-ray diffraction analysis.     

Synthesis of 2‐ and 2,7‐Functionalized Pyrene Derivatives: An Application of Selective C?H Borylation

An efficient synthetic route to 2‐ and 2,7‐substituted pyrenes is described. The regiospecific direct C? H borylation of pyrene with an iridium‐based catalyst, prepared in situ by the reaction of [{Ir(μ‐OMe)cod}₂] (cod=1,5‐cyclooctadiene) with 4,4′‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine, gives 2,7‐bis(Bpin)pyrene ( 1 ) and 2‐(Bpin)pyrene ( 2 , pin=OCMe₂CMe₂O). From 1 , by simple derivatization strategies, we synthesized 2,7‐bis(R)‐pyrenes with R=BF₃K ( 3 ), Br ( 4 ), OH ( 5 ), B(OH)₂ ( 6 ), and OTf ( 7 ). Using these nominally nucleophilic and electrophilic derivatives as coupling partners in Suzuki–Miyaura, Sonogashira, and Buchwald–Hartwig cross‐coupling reactions, we obtained 2,7‐bis(R)‐pyrenes with R=(4‐CO₂C₈H₁₇)C₆H₄ ( 8 ), Ph ( 9 ), C≡CPh ( 10 ), C≡C[{4‐B(Mes)₂}C₆H₄] ( 11 ), C≡CTMS ( 12 ), C≡C[(4‐NMe₂)C₆H₄] ( 14 ), C≡CH ( 15 ), N(Ph)[(4‐OMe)C₆H₄] ( 16 ), and R=OTf, R′=C≡CTMS ( 13 ). Lithiation of 4 , followed by reaction with CO₂, yielded pyrene‐2,7‐dicarboxylic acid ( 17 ), whilst borylation of 2‐tBu‐pyrene gave 2‐tBu‐7‐Bpin‐pyrene ( 18 ) selectively. By similar routes (including Negishi cross‐coupling reactions), monosubstituted 2‐R‐pyrenes with R=BF₃K ( 19 ), Br ( 20 ), OH ( 21 ), B(OH)₂ ( 22 ), [4‐B(Mes)₂]C₆H₄ ( 23 ), B(Mes)₂ ( 24 ), OTf ( 25 ), C≡CPh ( 26 ), C≡CTMS ( 27 ), (4‐CO₂Me)C₆H₄ ( 28 ), C≡CH ( 29 ), C₃H₆CO₂Me ( 30 ), OC₃H₆CO₂Me ( 31 ), C₃H₆CO₂H ( 32 ), OC₃H₆CO₂H ( 33 ), and O(CH₂)₁₂Br ( 34 ) were obtained from 2 . These derivatives are of synthetic and photophysical interest because they contain donor, acceptor, and conjugated substituents. The crystal structures of compounds 4 , 5 , 7 , 12 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 23 , 26 , and 28 – 31 have also been obtained from single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction data, revealing a diversity of packing modes, which are described in the Supporting Information. A detailed discussion of the structures of 1 and 2 , their polymorphs, solvates, and co‐crystals is reported separately.     

Half-sandwich complexes of lanthanides with tridentate ligands [RCH2CH(O)CH2OBun]2– (R = C5H4, 1-C9H6): synthesis,structures, and properties. The crystal structure of the complex {[(η5-C5H4)CH2CH(μ2:η1-O)CH2OBun]LaN(SiMe3)2}2

The oxirane-ring opening of butyl glycidyl ether with cyclopentadienylsodium or indenylsodium afforded cyclopentadienyl- and indenyl-substituted alcohols RHCH₂CH(OH)CH₂OBuⁿ (R = C₅H₄ (1) or 3-C₉H₆ (2), respectively), which were used as tridentate ligands. The reactions of these compounds with Ln[N(SiMe₃)₂]₃ produced the lanthanide complexes {[(⁵-R)CH₂CH(²:¹-O)CH₂OBuⁿ]LnN(SiMe₃)₂}₂ (R = C₅H₄, Ln = La (3), Pr (4), Er (5), Lu (6); or R = 1-C₉H₆, Ln = La (7)). The coordination spheres of the metal atoms in these complexes involve simultaneously the ⁵-cyclopentadienyl (indenyl), bridging alkoxide, and terminal amide ligands. The complexes were characterized by microanalysis, IR and NMR spectroscopy, and magnetochemistry. The crystal and molecular structure of complex 3 was established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis.     

η1-Alkynylplatinum(II) complexes with cycloocta-1,5-diene and tri(1-cyclohepta-2,4,6-trienyl)phosphane ligands

η¹-Alkynylplatinum(II) complexes of the type (cod)Pt(CCR)₂ (1, cod=η⁴-cycloocta-1,5-diene; R=Me (a), ^tBu (b), Ph (c), Fc (d), SiMe₃ (e)) were prepared in good yields from the reaction of (cod)PtCl₂ with either HCCR and NaOEt (R=^tBu, Ph, Fc) or di(1-alkynyl)dimethyltin, Me₂Sn(CCR)₂ (R=Me, SiMe₃). The analogous reaction of [P]PtCl₂ ([P]=tri(1-cyclohepta-2,4,6-trienyl)phosphane, {P(C₇H₇)₂(η²-C₇H₇)}) with Me₂Sn(CCR)₂ (R=Me, ^tBu, Ph, Fc, SiMe₃), afforded selectively the complexes [P]PtCl(CCR) 2a–e in high yield, in which the 1-alkynyl group is in cis position with respect to the phosphorus atom, and one of the C₇H₇ rings is η²-coordinated to platinum through the central CC bond. Complexes 3a–e of the type [P]Pt(CCR)₂ could not be prepared by the reaction of 2 with an excess of the 1-alkynyltin reagents. However, the reaction of 1 with the phosphane P(C₇H₇)₃ gave compounds 3a–e in quantitative yield by substitution of the cod ligand. The molecular structures of 2b and 3d were determined by X-ray structure analysis, and complexes 1–3 were characterised in solution by multinuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (¹H-, ¹³C-, ²⁹Si-, ³¹P-, ¹⁹⁵Pt-NMR). The structures of 2 and 3 in solution were found to be fluxional with respect to coordination of the C₇H₇ rings to platinum.     

Palladium(II) compounds with planar chirality. X-Ray crystal structures of (+)-(R)-[{(η5-C5H4)–CHN–CH(Me)–C10H7}Fe(η5-C5H5)] and (+)-(Rp,R)-[Pd{[(Et–CC–Et)2(η5-C5H3)–CHN–CH(Me)–C10H7]Fe(η5-C5H5)}Cl]

A wide variety of planar chiral cyclopalladated compounds of general formulae [Pd{[(η⁵-C₅H₃)–CHN–CH(Me)–C₁₀H₇]Fe(η⁵-C₅H₅)}Cl(L)] (with L=py-d₅ or PPh₃), [Pd{[(η⁵-C₅H₃)–CHN–CH(Me)–C₁₀H₇]Fe(η⁵-C₅H₅)}(acac)] or [Pd{[(R¹–CC–R²)₂(η⁵-C₅H₃)–CHN–CH(Me)–C₁₀H₇]Fe(η⁵-C₅H₅)}Cl] (with R¹=R²=Et; R¹=Me, R²=Ph; R¹=H, R²=Ph; R¹=R²=Ph; R¹=R²=CO₂Me or R¹=CO₂Et, R²=Ph) are reported. The diastereomers {(R_p,R) and (S_p,R)} of these compounds have been isolated by either column chromatography or fractional crystallization. The free ligand (R)-(+)-[{(η⁵-C₅H₄)–CHN–CH(Me)–C₁₀H₇}Fe(η⁵–C₅H₅)] (1) and compound (+)-(R_p,R)-[Pd{[(Et–CC–Et)₂(η⁵-C₅H₃)–CHN–CH(Me)–C₁₀H₇]Fe(η⁵-C₅H₅)}Cl] (7a) have also been characterized by X-ray diffraction. Electrochemical studies based on cyclic voltammetries of all the compounds are also reported.