Synthesis, nucleic acid binding and cytotoxicity of oligonuclear ruthenium complexes containing labile ligands

We report the synthesis, nucleic acid binding and cytotoxicity of the complexes [Ru(terpy)(Me₂bpy)Cl]⁺, [Ru(terpy)(phen)Cl]⁺ and dinuclear [{Ru(terpy)Cl}₂(??-bb_n)]²⁺ {where Me₂bpy = 4,4??-dimethyl-2,2??-bipyridine; phen = 1,10-phenanthroline; and bb_n = bis[4(4??-methyl-2,2??-bipyridyl)]-1,n-alkane, with n = 7, 10, 12, 14}. The complexes were isolated from the reaction of the [Ru(terpy)Cl₃] precursor with the respective bidentate and di-bidentate bridging ligands. The time-course UV?CVisible spectroscopy of the reaction of the mono- and dinuclear complexes with guanosine 5-monophosphate (GMP) showed the movement of the metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) band to lower wavelengths, accompanied by a hypochromism effect. The formation of the aqua complex and phosphate-bound intermediates in the reaction were detected by the time-course ¹H NMR and ³¹P NMR experiments, which also demonstrated that the complex bound to the N7 guanine was the major product. The UV?CVisible and ¹H NMR studies showed no evidence of the interaction of the complexes with both adenosine 5-monophosphate (AMP) and cytidine 5-monophosphate (CMP). Cytotoxicity studies of these complexes against a murine leukemia L1210 cell line revealed that the dinuclear [{Ru(terpy)Cl}₂(??-bb_n)]²⁺ complexes were significantly more cytotoxic than mononuclear [Ru(terpy)(Me₂bpy)Cl]⁺. The [{Ru(terpy)Cl}₂(??-bb₁₄)]²⁺ complex appeared to be the most active (IC₅₀ = 4.2 ??M).     

Spectral, structural and DFT studies of platinum group metal 3,6-bis(2-pyridyl)-4-phenylpyridazine complexes and their ligand bonding modes

Reactions of 3,6-bis(2-pyridyl)-4-phenylpyridazine (L^ph) with [(η⁶-arene)Ru(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ (arene = C₆H₆, p-ⁱPrC₆H₄Me and C₆Me₆), [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)M(μ-Cl)Cl]₂, (M = Rh and Ir) and [(η⁵-Cp)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cl] (Cp = C₅H₅, C₅Me₅ and C₉H₇) afford mononuclear complexes of the type [(η⁶-arene)Ru(L^ph)Cl]PF₆, [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)M(L^ph)Cl]PF₆ and [(Cp)Ru(L^ph)(PPh₃)]PF₆ with different structural motifs depending on the π-acidity of the ligand, electronic properties of the central metal atom and nature of the co-ligands. Complexes [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru(L^ph)Cl]PF₆1, [(η⁶-p-ⁱPrC₆H₄Me)Ru(L^ph)Cl]PF₆2, [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Ir(L^ph)Cl]PF₆5, [(η⁵-Cp)Ru(PPh₃)(L^ph)]PF₆, (Cp = C₅H₅, 6; C₅Me₅, 7; C₉H₇, 8) show the type-A binding mode (see text), while complexes [(η⁶-C₆Me₆)Ru(L^ph)Cl]PF₆3 and [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Rh(L^ph)Cl]PF₆4 show the type-B binding mode (see text). These differences reflect the more electron-rich character of the [(η⁶-C₆Me₆)Ru(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ and [(η⁵-C₅Me₅)Rh(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ complexes compared to the other starting precursor complexes. Binding modes of the ligand L^ph are determined by ¹H NMR spectroscopy, single-crystal X-ray analysis as well as evidence obtained from the solid-state structures and corroborated by density functional theory calculations. From the systems studied here, it is concluded that the electron density on the central metal atom of these complexes plays an important role in deciding the ligand binding sites.     

RuII and RuIII Chloronitrile Complexes: Synthesis,Reaction Chemistry,Solid State Structure,and (Spectro)Electrochemical Behavior

The synthesis of [Ti₆O₄(OiPr)₈(O₂CPh)₈] ( 3 ) and [RuCl(N≡CR)₅][RuCl₄(N≡CR)₂] ( 4a , R = Me; 4b , R = Ph), [Ru(N≡CPh)₆][RuCl₄(N≡CPh)₂] ( 5 ) and [H₃O][RuCl₄(N≡CMe)₂] ( 7a ) is discussed. Crystallization of 5 from CH₂Cl₂ gave trans-[RuCl₂(N≡CPh)₄] ( 6 ). The solid-state structures of 3 , 4a , b , 5 , 6 and 7a are reported. Complex 4b forms a 3D network, while 6 displays a 2D structure, due to π-interactions between the benzonitrile ligands. The (spectro)electrochemical behavior of 4a , b and 6 was studied at 25 and –72 °C and the results thereof are compared with [NEt₄][RuCl₄(N≡CMe)₂] ( 7b ) and [RuCl(N≡CPh)₅][PF₆] ( 8 ). The electrochemical response of the cation and the anion in 4a , b are independent from each other. [RuCl(N≡CR)₅]⁺ possesses one reversible Ru^II/Ru^III process. However, [RuCl₄(N≡CMe)₂]^– was shown to be prone to ligand exchange and disproportionation upon formation of either a Ru^IV and Ru^II species at 25 °C, while at –72 °C the rapid conversion of the electrochemically formed species is hindered. In situ IR and UV/Vis/NIR studies confirmed the respective disproportionation reaction products of the aforementioned oxidation and reduction, respectively.     

Heteroleptic ruthenium(II)/(III) 2,2′-bipyridine/1,10-phenanthroline complexes incorporating bidentate Schiff base N,O-ligands

Eight substituted bidentate Schiff base ligands HOC₆H₄CH=N-R (HL) (HL1: R = 4-ClC₆H₄, HL2: R = 2-ClC₆H₄, HL3: R = 4-NO₂C₆H₄, HL4: R = 4-MeC₆H₄, HL5: R = 2,6-Me₂C₆H₃, HL6: R = 2,46-Me₃C₆H₂, HL7: R = CH₂C₆H₅, and HL8: R = n-Pr) were synthesized by the typical condensation reaction. Interaction of cis-[Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂]?2H₂O (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) with one equivalent of HL ligand in the presence of KPF₆ afforded the cationic ruthenium(II) complexes of the type [Ru(bpy)₂(L)](PF₆) (1–8). The reaction of cis-[Ru(phen)₂Cl₂]?2H₂O (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline) and HL1 under similar condition gave complex [(phen)₂Ru(L)](PF₆) (1a). Treatment of cis-[Ru(phen)₂Cl₂]?2H₂O with two equivalents of HL in the presence of KPF₆ resulted in isolation of the cationic ruthenium(III) complexes of the type [Ru(phen)(L)₂](PF₆) (9-16). All complexes have been spectroscopically characterized. The structures of 1a?CH₂Cl₂, 2?½CH₂Cl₂, 3?CH₃CN, 5?½H₂O, 6, 12?½HOCH₂CH₂OH, 13?CH₃CN, 15?H₂O, and 16 have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.     

The synthesis,spectroscopic properties and electrochemistry of (8-quinolinolato)-bis-{1-alkyl-2- (arylazoimidazole)}ruthenium(ii) hexafluorophosphate: single crystal X-ray structure of [ru(q)(meaaime)2](PF6)·CH2Cl2 [Q = 8-quinolinolate,meaaime = 1-methyl-2-( p-tolylazoimidazole)]

The reaction of [Ru(OH₂)₂(RaaiR′)₂]²⁺ [RaaiR′ = 1-alkyl-2-(arylazo)imidazole, p-R–C₆H₄–N=N–C₃H₂–NN(1)–R′, R=H (1), Me (2), Cl (3); R′ = Me (a), Et (b), CH₂Ph (c)] with 8-quinolinol (HQ) in acetone solution followed by the addition of NH₄PF₆ afforded violet, mixed ligand complexes of composition [Ru(Q)(RaaiR′)₂](PF₆). The structure of [Ru(Q)(MeaaiMe)₂](PF₆) (2a) has been confirmed by X-ray diffraction studies. Solution electronic spectra exhibit a strong MLCT band at 560–580?nm in MeCN. Cyclic voltammogrames show a Ru(III)/Ru(II) couple at 1.0–1.1?V versus SCE along with three successive ligand reductions. The electronic properties are correlated with EHMO results.     

Synthesis,characterization, electrochemical and theoretical study of substituted phenyl-terpyridine and pyridine-quinoline based mixed chelate ruthenium complexes

In the present work, we report two methoxy-substituted phenyl-terpyridine ruthenium complexes with pyridine carboxyquinoline and NCS as ancillary ligands, [Ru(OMePhtpy)(pcqH)(NCS)](PF₆) (1) and [Ru(triOMePhtpy)(pcqH)(NCS)](PF₆) (2) (where OMePhtpy = (4′-(4-methoxy)phenyl-2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine, triOMePhtpy = (4′-(3,4,5-trimethoxy)phenyl-2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine and pcqH = pyridine-carboxyquinoline). Both complexes have been characterized by spectroscopic techniques e.g., mass, ¹H-NMR and FTIR. UV–vis spectrophotometric and electrochemical studies for both complexes have been performed. The substitution pattern of the –OMe groups have been successfully utilized to tune the redox potential of the metal complexes. On the anodic side of cyclic voltammogram, 1 and 2 show an irreversible wave corresponding to Ru^II/III couple at 0.95 and 0.85 V, respectively. The lower Ru^II/III oxidation potential for 2 may be attributed to increased electron density on ruthenium due to three (+R) methoxy–groups appended to the phenyl moiety of triOMePhtpy. DFT optimization of structure and energy calculation reveals that in both complexes, HOMO is metal- and thiocyanate-based, whereas the LUMO is based on pcqH. Correlation of TDDFT results with experimental electronic spectrum indicates that bands at 502 nm (1) and 528 nm (2) are of MLLCT character from ruthenium-thiocyanate to pcqH.     

Reactions of Ruthenium Complexes Containing Pentatetraenylidene Ligand

Two ruthenium acetylide complexes [Ru]?C≡C?C≡C?C(OR)(C₃H₅)₂ ( 2 , R=H and 2 a , R=CH₃; [Ru]=Cp(PPh₃)₂Ru) each with two cyclopropyl rings were synthesized from TMS?C≡C?C≡C?C(OH)(C₃H₅)₂ ( 1 ; TMS=trimethylsilyl). Treatments of 2 and 2 a with allyl halide in the presence of KPF₆ afforded the vinylidene complexes 3 and 3 a , respectively. When NH₄PF₆ was used, instead of KPF₆, additional ring‐opening reaction took place on one of the three‐membered ring. Treatment of [Ru]Cl with 1,3‐butadiyne ( 6 ), bearing an epoxide ring, afforded acetylide complex 7 with a furyl ring. Treatment of 2 a with Ph₃CPF₆ presumably afforded pentatetraenylidene complex {[Ru]=C=C=C=C=C(C₃H₅)₂}[PF₆] ( 10 ), which was not isolated. Additions of various alcohols in a solution of 10 generated a number of disubstituted allenylidene complexes {[Ru]=C=C=C(OR)?C=C(C₃H₅)₂}[PF₆] ( 11 ). Treatment of 11 with K₂CO₃ afforded the acetylide complex 12 bearing a carbonyl group, characterized by single X‐ray diffraction analysis. Addition of a primary amine to 10 caused cleavage of the farthermost C=C bond and several allenylidene complexes {[Ru]=C=C=C(Me)(NHR)}[PF₆] ( 18 ) were isolated.     

Synthesis,characterization, and cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of ruthenium(II) arene complexes with N,N-bidentate ligands

Three new complexes, [(η⁶-C₆H₆)RuCl(C₅H₄N-2-CH=N-Ar)]PF₆ (Ar = phenylmethylene (1), (4-methoxyphenyl)methylene (2), and phenylhydrazone (3)), were prepared by reacting [(η⁶-C₆H₆)Ru(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ with N,N′-bidentate ligands in a 1 : 2 ratio. Full characterization of the complexes was accomplished using ¹H and ¹³C NMR, elemental and thermal analyses, UV–vis and IR spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray structures. Single crystal structures confirmed a pseudo-octahedral three-legged, piano-stool geometry around Ru(II), with the ligand coordinated to the ruthenium(II) through two N atoms. The cytotoxicity of the mononuclear complexes was established against three human cancer cell lines and selectivity was also tested against non-cancerous human epithelial kidney (HEK 293) cells. The compounds were selective toward the tumor cells in contrast to the known anti-cancer drug 5-fluoro uracil which was not selective between the tumor cells and non-tumor cells. All the compounds showed moderate activity against MCF7 (human breast adenocarcinoma), but showed low antiproliferative activity against Caco-2 and HepG2. Also, antimicrobial activities of the complexes were tested against a panel of antimicrobial-susceptible and -resistant Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Of special interest is the anti-mycobacterial activity of all three synthesized complexes against Mycobacterium smegmatis, and bactericidal activity against resistant Enterococcus faecalis and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300.     

Hydroxylation of azomethine carbon: isolation of complexes of η5 and η6-cyclic hydrocarbon platinum group metals with a new Schiff-base ligand

A new Schiff base, (pyridin-2-yl)-N-(3,5-di(pyridin-2-yl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-yl)methanimine, (L), was synthesized. Reaction of [(η⁶-arene)Ru(µ-Cl)Cl]₂ and [Cp*M(µ-Cl)Cl]₂ (M = Rh and Ir) with one equivalent of L in the presence of NH₄PF₆ in methanol yielded dinuclear complexes, [(η⁶-arene)₂Ru₂(L-OH)Cl](PF₆)₂ {arene = C₆H₆ (1), p-ⁱPrC₆H₄Me (p-cymene) (2) and C₆Me₆ (3)}, and [Cp*₂M₂(L-OH)Cl](PF₆)₂ [M = Rh (4) and Ir (5)], respectively, leading to the formation of five new chiral complexes with –OH on the azomethine carbon. L is a pentadentate ligand where one of the metal centers is coordinated to two nitrogen atoms in a bidentate chelating fashion while the other metal is bonded tridentate to three nitrogen atoms. Although the ligand is neutral before coordination, after complexation it is anionic (uni-negative) with negative charge on the azo nitrogen {see the structures: N(5) in 2[PF₆]₂ and N(3) for 4[PF₆]₂}. The complexes have been characterized by various spectroscopic methods including infrared and ¹H NMR and the molecular structures of the representative complexes are established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies.     

Adducts of ruthenium(IV) thiolates with substituted pyridines. Syntheses and structures of [Ru(SMes)4(R-py)] (R = 4-Et, 4-tBu,and 3,5-Me2) and [{Ru(SMes)4}2(μ-4,4’-bipy)] (Mes = 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)

Treatment of the trigonal-bipyramidal ruthenium(IV)–thiolate complex, [Ru(SMes)₄(MeCN)] (Mes = 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl, 1), with an anhydrous diethyl ether solution of hydrogen chloride in THF afforded [Ru(SMes)₃Cl(MeCN)] (2), whereas interaction of 1 with [Et₄N]Cl in THF gave an anionic ruthenium(IV)–thiolate complex, [Et₄N][Ru(SMes)₄Cl] (3). Reaction of 1 with one equivalent of substituted pyridines in dichloromethane gave the corresponding pyridine-coordinated ruthenium(IV)–thiolate complexes, [Ru(SMes)₄(R-py)] (R = 4-Et, 4; 4-^tBu, 5; 3,5-Me₂, 6), while reaction of 1 with 0.5 equiv. of 4,4’-bipy (4,4’-bipy = 4,4’-bipyridine) in dichloromethane resulted in the formation of a dinuclear ruthenium(IV)–thiolate complex [{Ru(SMes)₄}₂(μ-4,4’-bipy)] (7). Complexes 2–7 have been spectroscopically characterized along with their electrochemical analyses, and their structures have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.     

Homo‐ and Heterodinuclear Ir and Rh Imine‐functionalized Protic NHC Complexes: Synthetic,Structural Studies,and Tautomerization/Metallotropism Insights

The influence of the potentially chelating imino group of imine‐functionalized Ir and Rh imidazole complexes on the formation of functionalized protic N‐heterocyclic carbene (pNHC) complexes by tautomerization/metallotropism sequences was investigated. Chloride abstraction in [Ir(cod)Cl{C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κN3}] ( 1 a ) (cod=1,5‐cyclooctadiene, Dipp=2,6‐diisopropylphenyl) with TlPF₆ gave [Ir(cod){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine)}]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 3 a ⁺[PF₆]^?). Plausible mechanisms for the tautomerization of complex 1 a to 3 a ⁺[PF₆]^? involving C2?H bond activation either in 1 a or in [Ir(cod){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κN3}₂]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 6 a ⁺[PF₆]^?) were postulated. Addition of PR₃ to complex 3 a ⁺[PF₆]^? afforded the eighteen‐valence‐electron complexes [Ir(cod)(PR₃){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine)}]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 7 a ⁺[PF₆]^? (R=Ph) and 7 b ⁺[PF₆]^? (R=Me)). In contrast to Ir, chloride abstraction from [Rh(cod)Cl{C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κN3}] ( 1 b ) at room temperature afforded [Rh(cod){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κN3}₂]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 6 b ⁺[PF₆]^?) and [Rh(cod){C₃H₃N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine)}]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 3 b ⁺[PF₆]^?) (minor); the reaction yielded exclusively the latter product in toluene at 110 °C. Double metallation of the azole ring (at both the C2 and the N3 atom) was also achieved: [Ir₂(cod)₂Cl{μ‐C₃H₂N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine),κN3}] ( 10 ) and the heterodinuclear complex [IrRh(cod)₂Cl{μ‐C₃H₂N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine),κN3}] ( 12 ) were fully characterized. The structures of complexes 1 b , 3 b ⁺[PF₆]^?, 6 a ⁺[PF₆]^?, 7 a ⁺[PF₆]^?, [Ir(cod){C₃HN₂(DippN=CMe)(DippN=CH)(Me)‐κ²(N3,N_imine)}]⁺[PF₆]^? ( 9 ⁺[PF₆]^?), 10? Et₂O ? toluene, [Ir₂(CO)₄Cl{μ‐C₃H₂N₂(DippN=CMe)‐κ²(C2,N_imine),κN3}] ( 11 ), and 12? 2 THF were determined by X‐ray diffraction.     

Synthetic and Structural Studies on High-Nuclearity Silver Ethynide Cluster Systems

A large family of crystalline organometallic compounds with silver ethynide (R–C≡CAg) as a component has been synthesized and characterized. In most cases the R–C≡C^? species coordinate to 3–5 silver(I) atoms, which may be symbolized as R–C≡C?Ag _n (n = 3, 4, 5; R = alkyl, aryl, heteroaryl) by leaving out the charges. In the present review, emphasis is laid on systematic synthetic and structural studies of high-nuclearity silver ethynide clusters, of which the size and shape can be controlled to a certain extent by the judicious choice of templating anions and auxiliary ligands.     

Syntheses and Structures of trans-bis(Alkenylacetylide) Ruthenium Complexes

A series of ruthenium alkenylacetylide complexes trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}Cl(dppe)₂] (R=Ph ( 1 a ), ^cC₄H₃S ( 1 b ), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ( 1 c ), 3,3-dimethyl-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b]thiophene (DMBT) ( 1 d )) or trans-[Ru{C≡C-^cC₆H₉}Cl(dppe)₂] ( 1 e ) were allowed to react with the corresponding propargylic alcohol HC≡CC(Me)R(OH) (R=Ph ( A ), ^cC₄H₃S ( B ), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ( C ), DMBT ( D ) or HC≡C-^cC₆H₁₀(OH) ( E ) in the presence of TlBF₄ and DBU to presumably give alkenylacetylide/allenylidene intermediates trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}{C=C=C(Me)}(dppe)₂]PF₆ ([ 2 ]PF₆). These complexes were not isolated but deprotonated to give the isolable bis(alkenylacetylide) complexes trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}₂(dppe)₂] (R=Ph ( 3 a ), ^cC₄H₃S ( 3 b ), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ( 3 c ), DMBT ( 3 d )) and trans-[Ru{C≡C-^cC₆H₉}₂(dppe)₂] ( 3 e ). Analogous reactions of trans-[Ru(CH₃)₂(dmpe)₂], featuring the more electron-donating 1,2-bis(dimethylphosphino)ethane (dmpe) ancillary ligands, with the propargylic alcohols A or C and NH₄PF₆ in methanol allowed isolation of the intermediate mixed alkenylacetylide/allenylidene complexes trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}{C=C=C(Me)}(dmpe)₂]PF₆ (R=Ph ([ 4 a ]PF₆), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ([ 4 c ]PF₆). Deprotonation of [ 4 a ]PF₆ or [ 4 c ]PF₆ gave the symmetric bis(alkenylacetylide) complexes trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}₂(dmpe)₂] (R=Ph ( 5 a ), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ( 5 c )), the first of their kind containing the dmpe ancillary ligand sphere. Attempts to isolate bis(allenylidene) complexes [Ru{C=C=C(Me)R}₂(PP)₂]²⁺ (PP=dppe, dmpe) from treatment of the bis(alkenylacetylide) species 3 or 5 with HBF₄ ⋅ Et₂O were ultimately unsuccessful.     

Ruthenium(II) complexes of aroylhydrazones: structural,electrochemical and electrostatic interactions with DNA

Four Ru(II) complexes with tridentate ligands viz. (4-hydroxy-N′-(pyridin-2-yl-ethylene) benzohydrazide [Ru(L¹)(PPh₃)₂(Cl)] (1), N′-(pyridin-2-yl-methylene) nicotinohydrazide [Ru(L²)(PPh₃)₂(Cl)] (2), N′-(1H-imidazol-2-yl-methylene)-4-hydroxybenzohydrazide [Ru(L³)(PPh₃)₂(Cl)] (3), and N′-(1H-imidazol-2-yl-methylene) nicotinohydrazide [Ru(L⁴)(PPh₃)₂(Cl)] (4) have been synthesized and characterized. The methoxy-derivative of L³H (abbreviated as L³H*) exists in E configuration with torsional angle of 179.4° around C₇-N₈-N₉-C₁₀ linkage. Single crystal structures of acetonitrile coordinated ruthenium complexes of 1 and 3 having compositins as [Ru(L¹)(PPh₃)₂(CH₃CN)]Cl (1a) and [Ru(L³)(PPh₃)₂(CH₃CN)]Cl (3a) revealed coordination of tridentate ligands with significantly distorted octahedral geometry constructed by imine nitrogen, heterocyclic nitrogen, and enolate amide oxygen, forming a cis-planar ring with trans-placement of two PPh₃ groups and a coordinated acetonitrile. Ligands (L¹H-L⁴H) and their ruthenium complexes (1–4) are characterized by ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR, and IR spectral analysis. Ru(II) complexes have reversible to quasi-reversible redox behavior having Ru(II)/Ru(III) oxidation potentials in the range of 0.40–0.71 V. The DNA binding constants determined by absorption spectral titrations with Herring Sperm DNA (HS-DNA) reveal that L⁴H and 1 interact more strongly than other ligands and Ru(II) complexes. Complexes 1–3 exhibit DNA cleaving activity possibly due to strong electrostatic interactions while 4 displays intercalation.     

Synthesis,characterization, and reactivity of self-assembled tetranuclear arene ruthenium metalla-rectangles

Self-assembly of 4,4′-bipyridine (bpy) with arene-ruthenium building blocks and 2,2′-bisbenzimidazole (H₂BiBzIm) in the presence of AgOTf (OTf = OSO₂CF₃) afforded tetranuclear cations of the type [Ru₄(η⁶-arene)₄(bpy)₂(BiBzIm)₂]⁴⁺ (arene = p-ⁱPrC₆H₄Me 1, C₆Me₆ 2), while similar reactions by use of [(η⁶-C₆Me₆)Ru(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ and excess AgOTf led to isolation of a cationic coordination network {[Ru₄(η⁶-C₆Me₆)₄(bpy)₂(BiBzIm)₂·Ag₂(OTf)₄]²⁺}_n (3), which could also be obtained by treatment of [2][OTf]₄ with AgOTf in methanol. Complex 3 is constructed by π coordination of BiBzIm(η²-carcon) with Ag(I). The coordination geometry around the silver(I) ion is pseudo-tetrahedral (taking the C=C group as one ligand). Self-assembly of only two components: [(η⁶-C₆Me₆)Ru(μ-Cl)Cl]₂ reacted with the 3-pyridyl-bian (mPy-bian) linker in the presence of limited AgOTf to give a chloro-bridged metalla-rectangle [Ru₄(η⁶-C₆Me₆)₄(μ-Cl)₄(mPy-bian)₂Ag]⁵⁺ (4), which enclosed a silver in the center. The coordination geometry around silver(I) in 4 is unusual square planar. The molecular structures of 1–4 were confirmed by X-ray crystallography along with other spectroscopic properties.     

Synthesis, characterization and photophysics of bimetallic manganese(I) and ruthenium(II) complexes

A series of new manganese(I) and ruthenium(II) monometallic and bimetallic complexes made of 2,2′-bipyridine and 1,10-phenanthroline ligands, [Mn(CO)₃(NN)(4,4′-bpy)]⁺, [{(CO)₃(NN)Mn}₂(4,4′-bpy)]²⁺ and [(CO)₃(NN)Mn(4,4′-bpy)Ru(NN)₂Cl]²⁺ (NN = 2,2′-bipyridine, 1,10-phenanthroline; 4,4′-bpy = 4,4′-bipyridine) are synthesized and characterized, in addition to already known ruthenium(II) complexes [Ru(NN)₂Cl(4,4′-bpy)]⁺ and [Cl(NN)₂Ru(4,4′-bpy)Ru(NN)₂Cl]²⁺. The electrochemical properties show that there is a weak interaction between two metal centers in Mn–Ru heterobimetallic complexes. The photophysical behavior of all the complexes is studied. The Mn(I) monometallic and homobimetallic complexes have no detectable emission. In Mn–Ru heterobimetallic complexes, the attachment of Mn(I) with Ru(II) provides interesting photophysical properties.     

Di- and trinuclear Ru(II) complexes of 1,10-phenanthroline and 2,2′-bipyridine derivatives; synthesis,photophysical and electrochemical properties

Three heterotopic ligands L¹, L², and L³ based on 1,10-phenanthroline and 2,2′-bipyridine moieties have been synthesized and characterized. The Ru(II) complexes [{Ru(bpy)₂}₃(µ₃-L¹)](PF₆)₆, [{Ru(bpy)₂}₃(µ₃-L²)](PF₆)₆, and [{Ru(bpy)₂}₂(µ₂-L³)](PF₆)₄ (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) have been prepared by refluxing Ru(bpy)₂Cl₂·2H₂O with each ligand in ethanol. All three complexes display MLCT absorptions at around 455 nm and emissions at around 618 nm. Electrochemical studies of the complexes reveal one Ru(II)-centered quasi-reversible oxidation at around 1.32 V and three ligand-centered reductions in each case.     

Monomere Dialkylmetallkomplexe des Typs R2M(NR′)2XR mit M = Al,Ga, In,TI; X = S,C und R,R′ = Alkyl und Silyl

Monomeric Dialkyl Metal Complexes of the R₂M(NR′)₂XR Type with M = Al, Ga, In, Tl; X = S, C and R, R′ = Alkyl and Silyl N,N′-Bis(trimethylsilyl)sulfurdiimide reacts with the trimethyl derivatives of aluminium, gallium, and indium within insertion. Hereby monomeric sulfinic acid imidamidates Me₂M(NSiMe₃)₂SMe (Me = CH₃) are formed. The lithium amidinates Li(NR′)₂CMe (R′ = i-C₃H₇ and SiMe₃) are formed likewise by insertion reactions with LiMe and the corresponding carbodiimides R′N?C?NR′ and were used in reactions with R₂MCl (M = Al to Tl) to synthesize dialkyl metal amidinates R₂M(NR′)₂CMe. The NMR (¹H and ¹³C) and the vibrational spectra (IR and Raman) are discussed and applied to describe the structure of these chelat complexes.