The <Emphasis Type="Italic">k</Emphasis>-domatic number of a graph

Let k be a positive integer, and let G be a simple graph with vertex set V (G). A k-dominating set of the graph G is a subset D of V (G) such that every vertex of V (G)-D is adjacent to at least k vertices in D. A k-domatic partition of G is a partition of V (G) into k-dominating sets. The maximum number of dominating sets in a k-domatic partition of G is called the k-domatic number d _k (G). In this paper, we present upper and lower bounds for the k-domatic number, and we establish Nordhaus-Gaddum-type results. Some of our results extend those for the classical domatic number d(G) = d ₁(G).      

The {k}-domatic number of a graph

For a positive integer k, a {k}-dominating function of a graph G is a function f from the vertex set V(G) to the set {0, 1, 2, . . . , k} such that for any vertex ${v\in V(G)}$ , the condition ${\sum_{u\in N[v]}f(u)\ge k}$ is fulfilled, where N[v] is the closed neighborhood of v. A {1}-dominating function is the same as ordinary domination. A set {f ₁, f ₂, . . . , f _d } of {k}-dominating functions on G with the property that ${\sum_{i=1}^df_i(v)\le k}$ for each ${v\in V(G)}$ , is called a {k}-dominating family (of functions) on G. The maximum number of functions in a {k}-dominating family on G is the {k}-domatic number of G, denoted by d _{k}(G). Note that d _{1}(G) is the classical domatic number d(G). In this paper we initiate the study of the {k}-domatic number in graphs and we present some bounds for d _{k}(G). Many of the known bounds of d(G) are immediate consequences of our results.     

Upper bounds on the signed (k, k)-domatic number

Let G be a graph with vertex set V(G), and let f : V(G) → {?1, 1} be a two-valued function. If k ≥ 1 is an integer and ${\sum_{x\in N[v]} f(x) \ge k}$ for each ${v \in V(G)}$ , where N[v] is the closed neighborhood of v, then f is a signed k-dominating function on G. A set {f ₁,f ₂, . . . ,f _d } of distinct signed k-dominating functions on G with the property that ${\sum_{i=1}^d f_i(x) \le k}$ for each ${x \in V(G)}$ , is called a signed (k, k)-dominating family (of functions) on G. The maximum number of functions in a signed (k, k)-dominating family on G is the signed (k, k)-domatic number of G. In this article we mainly present upper bounds on the signed (k, k)-domatic number, in particular for regular graphs.     

Signed star domatic number of a graph

Let G be a simple graph without isolated vertices with vertex set V(G) and edge set E(G). A function f:E(G)?{−1,1} is said to be a signed star dominating function on G if ∑_e∈E(v)f(e)≥1 for every vertex v of G, where E(v)={uv∈E(G)∣u∈N(v)}. A set {f₁,f₂,…,f_d} of signed star dominating functions on G with the property that for each e∈E(G), is called a signed star dominating family (of functions) on G. The maximum number of functions in a signed star dominating family on G is the signed star domatic number of G, denoted by d_SS(G).In this paper we study the properties of the signed star domatic number d_SS(G). In particular, we determine the signed domatic number of some classes of graphs.     

A note on Roman domination in graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a simple graph. A subset S⊆V is a dominating set of G, if for any vertex u∈V-S, there exists a vertex v∈S such that uv∈E. The domination number of G, γ(G), equals the minimum cardinality of a dominating set. A Roman dominating function on graph G=(V,E) is a function f:V→{0,1,2} satisfying the condition that every vertex v for which f(v)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex u for which f(u)=2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is the value f(V)=∑_v∈Vf(v). The Roman domination number of a graph G, denoted by γ_R(G), equals the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on G. In this paper, for any integer k(2?k?γ(G)), we give a characterization of graphs for which γ_R(G)=γ(G)+k, which settles an open problem in [E.J. Cockayne, P.M. Dreyer Jr, S.M. Hedetniemi et al. On Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 278 (2004) 11-22].     

On signed distance-k-domination in graphs

The signed distance-k-domination number of a graph is a certain variant of the signed domination number. If v is a vertex of a graph G, the open k-neighborhood of v, denoted by N _k (v), is the set N _k (v) = {u: u ≠ v and d(u, v) ⩽ k}. N _k [v] = N _k (v) ⋃ {v} is the closed k-neighborhood of v. A function f: V → {−1, 1} is a signed distance-k-dominating function of G, if for every vertex . The signed distance-k-domination number, denoted by γ _k,s (G), is the minimum weight of a signed distance-k-dominating function on G. The values of γ _2,s (G) are found for graphs with small diameter, paths, circuits. At the end it is proved that γ _2,s (T) is not bounded from below in general for any tree T.     

Roman domination in regular graphs

A Roman domination function on a graph G=(V(G),E(G)) is a function f:V(G)→{0,1,2} satisfying the condition that every vertex u for which f(u)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex v for which f(v)=2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is the value f(V(G))=∑_u∈V(G)f(u). The minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on a graph G is called the Roman domination number of G. Cockayne et al. [E. J. Cockayne et al. Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Mathematics 278 (2004) 11-22] showed that γ(G)≤γ_R(G)≤2γ(G) and defined a graph G to be Roman if γ_R(G)=2γ(G). In this article, the authors gave several classes of Roman graphs: P_3k,P_3k+2,C_3k,C_3k+2 for k≥1, K_m,n for min{m,n}≠2, and any graph G with γ(G)=1; In this paper, we research on regular Roman graphs and prove that: (1) the circulant graphs and , n⁄≡1 (mod (2k+1)), (n≠2k) are Roman graphs, (2) the generalized Petersen graphs P(n,2k+1)( (mod 4) and ), P(n,1) (n⁄≡2 (mod 4)), P(n,3) ( (mod 4)) and P(11,3) are Roman graphs, and (3) the Cartesian product graphs are Roman graphs.     

Signed total (k, k)-domatic number of digraphs

Let D be a finite and simple digraph with vertex set V(D), and let f: V(D) → {?1, 1} be a two-valued function. If k ≥?1 is an integer and ${\sum_{x \in N^-(v)}f(x) \ge k}$ for each ${v \in V(G)}$ , where N ^?(v) consists of all vertices of D from which arcs go into v, then f is a signed total k-dominating function on D. A set {f ₁, f ₂, . . . , f _d } of signed total k-dominating functions on D with the property that ${\sum_{i=1}^df_i(x)\le k}$ for each ${x \in V(D)}$ , is called a signed total (k, k)-dominating family (of functions) on D. The maximum number of functions in a signed total (k, k)-dominating family on D is the signed total (k, k)-domatic number on D, denoted by ${d_{st}^{k}(D)}$ . In this paper we initiate the study of the signed total (k, k)-domatic number of digraphs, and we present different bounds on ${d_{st}^{k}(D)}$ . Some of our results are extensions of known properties of the signed total domatic number ${d_{st}(D)=d_{st}^{1}(D)}$ of digraphs D as well as the signed total domatic number d _st (G) of graphs G, given by Henning (Ars Combin. 79:277–288, 2006).     

The signed domatic number of some regular graphs

Let G be a finite and simple graph with vertex set V(G), and let f:V(G)→{−1,1} be a two-valued function. If ∑_x∈N[v]f(x)≥1 for each v∈V(G), where N[v] is the closed neighborhood of v, then f is a signed dominating function on G. A set {f₁,f₂,…,f_d} of signed dominating functions on G with the property that for each x∈V(G), is called a signed dominating family (of functions) on G. The maximum number of functions in a signed dominating family on G is the signed domatic number on G. In this paper, we investigate the signed domatic number of some circulant graphs and of the torus C_p×C_q.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">f</Emphasis>-Colorings of some graphs of <Emphasis Type="Italic">f</Emphasis>-class 1

An f-coloring of a graph G is an edge-coloring of G such that each color appears at each vertex v V（G） at most f（v） times. The minimum number of colors needed to f-color G is called the f-chromatic index of G and is denoted by X′f（G）. Any simple graph G has the f-chromatic index equal to △f（G） or △f（G） ＋ 1, where △f（G） =max v V（G）{[d（v）/f（v）]}. If X′f（G） = △f（G）, then G is of f-class 1; otherwise G is of f-class 2. In this paper, a class of graphs of f-class 1 are obtained by a constructive proof. As a result, f-colorings of these graphs with △f（G） colors are given.     

Unique response Roman domination in graphs

A function f:V(G)→{0,1,2} is a Roman dominating function if every vertex u for which f(u)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex v for which f(v)=2. A function f:V(G)→{0,1,2} with the ordered partition (V₀,V₁,V₂) of V(G), where V_i={v∈V(G)∣f(v)=i} for i=0,1,2, is a unique response Roman function if x∈V₀ implies |N(x)∩V₂|≤1 and x∈V₁∪V₂ implies that |N(x)∩V₂|=0. A function f:V(G)→{0,1,2} is a unique response Roman dominating function if it is a unique response Roman function and a Roman dominating function. The unique response Roman domination number of G, denoted by u_R(G), is the minimum weight of a unique response Roman dominating function. In this paper we study the unique response Roman domination number of graphs and present bounds for this parameter.     

On the Roman domination number of a graph

A Roman dominating function of a graph G is a labeling f:V(G)?{0,1,2} such that every vertex with label 0 has a neighbor with label 2. The Roman domination number γ_R(G) of G is the minimum of ∑_v∈V(G)f(v) over such functions. A Roman dominating function of G of weight γ_R(G) is called a γ_R(G)-function. A Roman dominating function f:V?{0,1,2} can be represented by the ordered partition (V₀,V₁,V₂) of V, where V_i={v∈V∣f(v)=i}. Cockayne et al. [E.J. Cockayne, P.A. Dreyer, S.M. Hedetniemi, S.T. Hedetniemi, On Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 278 (2004) 11-22] posed the following question: What can we say about the minimum and maximum values of |V₀|,|V₁|,|V₂| for a γ_R-function f=(V₀,V₁,V₂) of a graph G? In this paper we first show that for any connected graph G of order n≥3, , where γ(G) is the domination number of G. Also we prove that for any γ_R-function f=(V₀,V₁,V₂) of a connected graph G of order n≥3, , and .     

The signed <Emphasis Type="Italic">k</Emphasis>-domination number of directed graphs

Let k ≥ 1 be an integer, and let D = (V; A) be a finite simple digraph, for which d _D ⁻ ≥ k − 1 for all v ɛ V. A function f: V → {−1; 1} is called a signed k-dominating function (SkDF) if f(N ⁻[v]) ≥ k for each vertex v ɛ V. The weight w(f) of f is defined by $ \sum\nolimits_{v \in V} {f(v)} $ \sum\nolimits_{v \in V} {f(v)} . The signed k-domination number for a digraph D is γ _kS (D) = min {w(f|f) is an SkDF of D. In this paper, we initiate the study of signed k-domination in digraphs. In particular, we present some sharp lower bounds for γ _kS (D) in terms of the order, the maximum and minimum outdegree and indegree, and the chromatic number. Some of our results are extensions of well-known lower bounds of the classical signed domination numbers of graphs and digraphs.     

The upper traceable number of a graph

For a nontrivial connected graph G of order n and a linear ordering s: v ₁, v ₂, …, v _n of vertices of G, define . The traceable number t(G) of a graph G is t(G) = min{d(s)} and the upper traceable number t ⁺(G) of G is t ⁺(G) = max{d(s)}, where the minimum and maximum are taken over all linear orderings s of vertices of G. We study upper traceable numbers of several classes of graphs and the relationship between the traceable number and upper traceable number of a graph. All connected graphs G for which t ⁺(G) − t(G) = 1 are characterized and a formula for the upper traceable number of a tree is established. Research supported by Srinakharinwirot University, the Thailand Research Fund and the Commission on Higher Education, Thailand under the grant number MRG 5080075.     

Radio number for trees

Let G be a connected graph with diameter diam(G). The radio number for G, denoted by rn(G), is the smallest integer k such that there exists a function f:V(G)→{0,1,2,…,k} with the following satisfied for all vertices u and v: |f(u)-f(v)|?diam(G)-d_G(u,v)+1, where d_G(u,v) is the distance between u and v. We prove a lower bound for the radio number of trees, and characterize the trees achieving this bound. Moreover, we prove another lower bound for the radio number of spiders (trees with at most one vertex of degree more than two) and characterize the spiders achieving this bound. Our results generalize the radio number for paths obtained by Liu and Zhu.     

On Connected [g,f +1]-Factors in Graphs

Let G = (V (G),E(G)) be a graph with vertex set V (G) and edge set E(G), and g and f two positive integral functions from V (G) to Z⁺-{1} such that g(v) ≤ f(v) ≤ d_G(v) for all v ∈V (G), where d_G(v) is the degree of the vertex v. It is shown that every graph G, including both a [g,f]-factor and a hamiltonian path, contains a connected [g,f +1]-factor. This result also extends Kano’s conjecture concerning the existence of connected [k,k+1]-factors in graphs. * The work of this author was supported by NSFC of China under Grant No. 10271065, No. 60373025. † The work of these authors was also supported in part by the US Department of Energy’s Genomes to Life program (http://doegenomestolife.org/) under project, “Carbon Sequestration in Synechococcus sp.: From Molecular Machines to Hierarchical Modeling” (www.genomes2life.org) and by National Science Foundation (NSF/DBI-0354771,NSF/ITR-IIS-0407204).     

On the Wiener Index of Graphs

The Wiener index of a graph G is defined as W(G)=∑ _u,v d _G (u,v), where d _G (u,v) is the distance between u and v in G and the sum goes over all the pairs of vertices. In this paper, we first present the 6 graphs with the first to the sixth smallest Wiener index among all graphs with n vertices and k cut edges and containing a complete subgraph of order n−k; and then we construct a graph with its Wiener index no less than some integer among all graphs with n vertices and k cut edges.     

On the locating chromatic number of Kneser graphs

Let c be a proper k-coloring of a connected graph G and Π=(C₁,C₂,…,C_k) be an ordered partition of V(G) into the resulting color classes. For a vertex v of G, the color code of v with respect to Π is defined to be the ordered k-tuple c_Π(v):=(d(v,C₁),d(v,C₂),…,d(v,C_k)), where d(v,C_i)=min{d(v,x)|x∈C_i},1≤i≤k. If distinct vertices have distinct color codes, then c is called a locating coloring. The minimum number of colors needed in a locating coloring of G is the locating chromatic number of G, denoted by χ_L(G). In this paper, we study the locating chromatic number of Kneser graphs. First, among some other results, we show that χ_L(KG(n,2))=n−1 for all n≥5. Then, we prove that χ_L(KG(n,k))≤n−1, when n≥k². Moreover, we present some bounds for the locating chromatic number of odd graphs.     

On the domatic and the total domatic numbers of the 2-section graph of the order-interval hypergraph of a finite poset

Let P be a finite poset and H(P) be the hypergraph whose vertices are the points of P and whose edges are the maximal intervals in P. We study the domatic number d(G(P)) and the total domatic number d_t(G(P)) of the 2-section graph G(P) of H(P). For the subset P_l,u of P induced by consecutive levels of P, we give exact values of d(G(P_l,u)) when P is the chain product C_n1×C_n2. According to the values of l,u,n₁,n₂, the maximal domatic partition is exhibited. Moreover, we give some exact values or lower bounds for d(G(P∗Q)) and d_t(G(P_l,u)), when ∗ is the direct sum, the linear sum or the Cartesian product. Finally we show that the domatic number and the total domatic number problems in this class of graphs are NP-complete.     

On the Roman Bondage Number of Planar Graphs

A Roman dominating function on a graph G is a function f : V(G) → {0, 1, 2} satisfying the condition that every vertex u for which f (u) = 0 is adjacent to at least one vertex v for which f (v) = 2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is the value f (V(G)) = ?_{u ? V(G)} f (u){f (V(G)) = \sum_{u\in V(G)} f (u)}. The Roman domination number, γ _R (G), of G is the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on G. The Roman bondage number b _R (G) of a graph G with maximum degree at least two is the minimum cardinality of all sets E^￠ í E(G){E^{\prime} \subseteq E(G)} for which γ _R (G − E′) > γ _R (G). In this paper we present different bounds on the Roman bondage number of planar graphs.