比对法在计量标准考核验证中的应用探讨

为探讨比对法在计量标准考核验证中的可行性,将5家实验室分别对同一分度吸量管的检定结果进行比对,同时采用具有溯源性的传递比较法进一步验证比对法的可靠性。验证结果显示,采用比对法和传递比较法对被考核实验室的验证结果一致,说明采用比对法对检定结果的验证是有效的、可行的。     

化学标准物质期间核查方法

从认可实验室管理的角度,阐述了化学标准物质期间核查的目的和意义。化学标准物质常见期间核查方法有实验室比对或能力验证、标准物质间比对、控制图法、允差法及标定法。结合实例介绍了化学标准物质期间核查的具体过程,为开展化学标准物质期间核查工作提供参考。     

化学分析实验室标准物质期间核查方法及实例分析

为了保证化学分析实验室的分析质量,根据CNAS相关认可准则要求,讨论了标准物质期间核查的实施。从确定需要期间核查的标准物质以及期间核查的内容两方面介绍了标准物质期间核查的过程。以氢氧化钠标准滴定溶液为例,讨论了标准物质期间核查的方法。结果显示,氢氧化钠标准溶液定值后两个月其状态核查满足计量要求,量值核查结果 ;E_n;1 1,量值稳定。     

理化实验室标准物质期间核查方法与实例

CNAS-CL01《检测和校准实验室能力认可准则》及《实验室资质认定评审准则》[2]要求进行标准物质的期间核查。标准物质期间核查是为保持其校准状态的置信度,即为了验证标准物质在贮存、使用的过程中不发生质量的变化,避免因检测人员的使用和保管不当造成的标准物质量值传递发生偏     

控制图在直读光谱仪期间核查中的应用

期间核查是指在两次校准(或检定)的间隔期内进行的核查,核查对象有仪器设备、标准物质、计量基准、传递标准或工作标准,以判断所使用的设备、标准物质等是否保持检定时的置信度,满足检验工作的需要。此外,ISO/IEC 17025:2005《检测和校准实验室能力的通用要求》中第5.5设备和第5.6测量溯源性两个要素中都提到期间核查[1];CNAS-CL01:2010《检测和校准实验室能力认可     

检测/校准实验室仪器设备及标准物质期间核查实施方法

对检测/校准实验室仪器设备及标准物质期间核查的具体实施进行了讨论,重点介绍编写期间核查作业指导书需明确的内容,包括明确核查对象、确定核查项目、选择核查方法、规定核查间隔、获取核查判据及如何判定对核查不合格的处置.指出既能利用期间核查确保仪器设备及标准物质的可靠性,又不浪费人力物力的措施.     

控制图在检测实验室设备期间核查中的应用

探讨了统计控制图在检测实验室一些易漂移设备期间核查中的应用。以天平的期间核查为例,利用20组观测数据绘制控制图,得到X图、R图、S图,并结合X–R图分析核查天平的状态。分析结果表明,将统计用控制图应用于检测实验室仪器期间核查可以随时掌握仪器设备校准状态是否发生变化,该法简单易行。     

药代动力学实验室液相色谱串联质谱仪期间核查方法的建立

建立符合ISO17025认可要求的药代动力学实验室中液相色谱串联质谱仪的期间核查方法。采用仪器状态及性能核查、仪器比对及全国室间质评等手段,对液相色谱质谱联用仪检测结果的有效性及准确性进行评价。结果为仪器状态及性能核查指标全部合格;仪器比对采用API 3200QTrap与API 4000的测试数据进行比较,结果两组间精密度(ρ=0.072,P>0.05)及均值(ρ=0.380,P>0.05)均无差异;全国室间质评5组盲样的测试浓度均在允许范围内,全部合格通过。2019年度液相色谱质谱联用仪期间核查结果为满意。期间核查可系统评价液相色谱质谱联用仪的性能,提高检测质量,以满足CNAS CL-01:2018对药代动力学实验室仪器的要求。     

辉光放电质谱仪期间核查控制图在实验室质量控制中的应用

仪器设备的期间核查是实验室管理及实验室认证认可的一项基本要求,辉光放电质谱仪主要应用于高纯金属材料的分析,标样研制较为困难,使用高纯标准物质进行质量控制及期间核查的方法难以实现。对用液氮低温冷却离子源型的辉光放电质谱仪,使用纯钽片在进行日常仪器调试信号时得到的钨元素含量数据,用于绘制平均值-极差控制图作为实验室质量控制及期间核查的判定依据,以此评价仪器日常工作的性能状态,以保证检测结果的正确性和可靠性。     

浅谈如何进行标准物质的期间核查

在环境监测领域,标准物质的期间核查没有统一、细化、规范的操作准则,导致其管理水平存在着较大的差异,为了减小这种差异,从资料搜集、台帐建立、核查种类、核查参数、核查方法、核查频度的合理选择、期间核查计划的制定实施等方面进行了分析探讨,使期间核查工作有了较强的操作性,保证了监测数据的准确、可靠。     

自动校准型pH计电计输入阻抗引起的示值误差检定方法的探讨

由于一些自动校准型pH计设置的校准点与计量检定规程要求的pH 7(或电计等电位值)无法对应,探讨了用pH 6.86点代替pH 7点,解决了电计输入阻抗引起的示值误差无法按照计量检定规程要求进行检定的问题。通过实验验证了该方法的可行性。     

Development of metrology for pH measurement in Thailand

It has not been long that metrology is well accepted as an important part in analytical chemistry since it helps the chemists to receive the best measurement and accurate results with traceability. The National Institute of Metrology Thailand (NIMT), which is a public agency under the supervision of the Ministry of Science and Technology, not only focuses on physical standards but also provides and maintains standards in chemical field. pH measurement is one of the most widely used in the laboratories including industries and medical area in Thailand. The chemical laboratory starts working on the project with the objective of disseminating an accurate result in routine pH measurement. In 2002, the laboratory provided a service in calibration of pH meter and organized the first local interlaboratory comparison program (NIMT–C-ILC-1: pH buffer) in pH measurement. There were three buffer solution samples in the range of acid, neutral, and base. A total of 44 laboratories participated in this program. The NIMT chemical laboratory also participated in the proficiency testing program that was conducted by PSB Corporation Testing Group in Singapore. In 2003, NIMT started research in preparation of secondary buffers by using highly accurate pH meters with glass electrode systems. The laboratory produced three secondary buffers, which were pH 4.01, 6.86, and 9.18 with uncertainty 0.020 pH at 25°C. The competence of the laboratory was shown by the measurement results of the pilot study (APMP.QM-P06), which was organized by the APMP electrochemical analysis working group (EAWG/TCQM) in 2005. The title of this study was “pH determination of two phosphate buffers by Harned cell method and glass electrode method”. NIMT aims to achieve for establishment of the primary method for pH measurement in the near future. Presented at -- “BERM-10” -- April 2006, Charleston, SC, USA     

基于光度法的高精度海水pH值测量系统

基于光度法的海水pH值自动测量系统测定速度快,精密度高,是海洋酸化和碳循环研究急需的测量装置.本研究以光度法和流动注射分析技术为基础,通过整合泵阀流路体系、LED光源、流通池和光谱仪,研发了海水pH值自动测量系统.本系统在分析过程中不易产生气泡,利用指示剂在样品中的浓度变化校正指示剂的加入带来的测量偏差,操作简单方便,测量一个样品用时约为1.5 min,精密度为0.0013,准确度为0.0059,可在实验室或调查船中对所采集的海水快速地进行高精度pH值测量.     

Use of SE-30 as a stationary phase for the gas-liquid chromatography of drugs.

The dimethyl silicone elastomer SE-30 has been chosen as the preferred liquid phase for the gas-liquid chromatographic analysis of drugs, and retention index data have been compiled for 480 drugs and commonly occurring chemicals such as plasticisers. The inter-laboratory variation in measurement of retention indices has been measured for three drugs in eleven laboratories and the standard deviations were between 20 and 15 retention index units.     

蒙特卡洛法评定在线pH计示值误差的不确定度

以在线p H计为例,考察了在线酸度计示值误差不确定度的分布规律,利用蒙特卡洛法评定示值误差不确定度。对于0.01级的在线p H计,蒙特卡洛法与GUM法评定结果的差值为9.1%,小于不可靠性(20%);对于0.1级的在线p H计,蒙特卡洛法与GUM法评定结果的差值为3.8%,小于不可靠性(10%)。通过比较得出结论,采用GUM法验证了蒙特卡洛法(MCM)根据JJF 1547–2015评定在线p H计示值误差不确定度的方法是有效且适用的。尤其在测量模型非线性以及输出量的概率密度函数(PDF)较大程度地偏离正态分布或t分布等GUM法不适用的场合,蒙特卡洛法是评定在线分析监测仪器仪表示值误差不确定度的重要手段。     

Spectrophotometric pH measurements of freshwater

The use of cresol red (CR) indicator for determination of freshwater pH is evaluated. Ionic strength effects and indicator pH perturbation are discussed and quantified using theoretical and empirical approaches. Spectrophotometric and potentiometric methods are directly compared by repeated analyses of a low ionic strength pH buffer. The mean and standard deviation of the two methods were 7.618±0.008 (spectrophotometric) and 7.484±0.040 (potentiometric) (N=18) with systematic errors of 0.003 and 0.137 pH units relative to the true pH (7.621). Field data from an alkaline river (pH∼7.8-8.8) show that measurement reproducibility is better than 0.01 pH units, making it possible to resolve very small spatial and temporal changes in riverine pH. Uncertainty in the indicator apparent dissociation constant limits the accuracy of the pH measurement to ∼0.05 pH units. An alternative method for estimating the dissociation constant, based on calculation of pH from two other carbonate parameters, is proposed.     

Estimation of uncertainty in routine pH measurement

A procedure for estimation of measurement uncertainty of routine pH measurement (pH meter with two-point calibration, with or without automatic temperature compensation, combination glass electrode) based on the ISO method is presented. It is based on a mathematical model of pH measurement that involves nine input parameters. Altogether 14 components of uncertainty are identified and quantified. No single uncertainty estimate can be ascribed to a pH measurement procedure: the uncertainty of pH strongly depends on changes in experimental details and on the pH value itself. The uncertainty is the lowest near the isopotential point and in the center of the calibration line and can increase by a factor of 2 (depending on the details of the measurement procedure) when moving from around pH 7 to around pH 2 or 11. Therefore it is necessary to estimate the uncertainty separately for each measurement. For routine pH measurement the uncertainty cannot be significantly reduced by using more accurate standard solutions than ±0.02 pH units – the uncertainty improvement is small. A major problem in estimating the uncertainty of pH is the residual junction potential, which is almost impossible to take rigorously into account in the framework of a routine pH measurement.¹ Received: 11 August 2001 Accepted: 22 February 2002     

RGB颜色模式下的水溶液pH值定量测定

在手机比色法基础上,引入误差传递规律,提出了一种测量pH值的新方法。在石蕊指示剂的显色范围内,向系列标准pH缓冲溶液滴加石蕊,溶液颜色由红变紫,以3款不同类型手机进行图片采集,利用误差传递公式对直接测量值进行优化。结果表明,理论和实验均证明了改进后的手机比色法的误差更小。3款手机得到的间接测量值与pH值变化趋势一致,其中iPhone 5S的X_B与pH值线性关系最优。2组平行实验测定的相对标准偏差分别为2.009%和6.546%。以pH酸度计为测定标准,用该方法对自来水、农夫山泉天然水、百岁山矿泉水和爱夸矿泉水进行测定,两者的pH值测定结果基本一致,表明pH手机比色法的稳定性和可靠性符合测定要求。     

Quality assurance in analytical measurement

 The peculiarities of analytical measurement require to check characteristics of the error (its components) of the obtained analysis results to assure the quality of the measurements. This article deals with the various quality assurance procedures and algorithms which are used to check the quality indices, i.e. the accuracy, reproducibility, certainty and repeatability of analytical measurements: These procedures include: laboratory rapid control; Intra-laboratory statistical control (statistical selection control by alternative attribute, statistical selection control by quantity method of periodic check of the analysis procedure for conformity to the specified requirements) and external control (inter-laboratory control checks, inter-laboratory comparison tests, and intra-laboratory control algorithms carried out by the appropriate supervisory body.) in the separately taken laboratory. The respective algorithms, control plans and control requirements, specified according to the different control aims and assurance tasks, enable the quality and certianty of analytical information obtained in laboratories in Russia to be assured. Received: 9 November 1998 / Accepted: 24 November 1998