On total matching numbers and total covering numbers of complementary graphs

Best upper and lower bounds, as functions of n, are obtained for the quantities $\text{β}{}_2\text{(G)+β}{}_2\text{(}\text{G}\text{?}\text{)}$ and $\text{α}{}_2\text{(G)+α}{}_2\text{(}\text{G}\text{?}\text{)}$, where β₂(G) denotes the total matching number and α₂(G) the total covering number of any graph G with n vertices and with complementry graph ?.The best upper bound is obtained also for α₂(G)+β₂(G), when G is a connected graph.     

Connected matroids with the smallest whitney numbers

In “The Slimmest Geometric Lattices” (Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.). Dowling and Wilson showed that if G is a combinatorial geometry of rank r(G) = n, and if _X(G) = Σμ(0, x)λ^{r ? r(x)} = Σ (?1)^{r ? k}W_kλ^k is the characteristic polynomial of G, then

$\text{w}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{?}\text{r}\text{k}\text{+n}\text{r?1}\text{k}$

Thus γ(G) ? 2^{r ? 1} (n+2), where γ(G) = Σw_k. In this paper we sharpen these lower bounds for connected geometries: If G is connected, r(G) ? 3, and n(G) ? 2 ((r, n) ≠ (4,3)), then

$\text{w}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{r}\text{i}\text{+ n}\text{r}\text{i+1}\text{for i>1; w}{}_1\text{?r+n}\text{r}\text{2}\text{? 1;}$

|μ| ? (r? 1)n; and γ ? (2^{r ? 1} ? 1)(2n + 2). These bounds are all achieved for the parallel connection of an r-point circuit and an (n + 1)point line. If G is any series-parallel network, $\text{r(G) = r(}\text{G}\text{?}\text{) = 4}$, and $\text{n(G) = n(}\text{G}\text{?}\text{) = 3}$ then $\text{(w}{}_1\text{(G))}{}^4{}_{\mathrm{t-G}}\text{? (w}{}_1\text{(}\text{G}\text{?}\text{)) = (8, 20, 18, 7, 1)}$. Further, if β is the Crapo invariant,

$\text{β(G)=}\text{d}{}_{\mathrm{X}}\text{(G)}\text{dλ}\text{(1)}\text{,}$

then β(G) ? max(1, n ? r + 2). This lower bound is achieved by the parallel connection of a line and a maximal size series-parallel network.     

Minimally k-connected graphs of low order and maximal size

Let G be a minimally k-connected graph of order n and size e(G).Mader [4] proved that (i) $\text{e(G)?kn?(}\text{k+1}\text{2}\text{)}$; (ii) e(G)?k(n?k) if n?3k?2, and the complete bipartite graph K_k,n?k is the only minimally k-connected graph of order; n and size k(n?k) when k?2 and n?3k?1.The purpose of the present paper is to determine all minimally k-connected graphs of low order and maximal size. For each n such that k+1?n?3k?2 we prove $\text{e(G)??}\text{(n+k)}{}^2\text{8}\text{?}$ and characterize all minimally k-connected graphs of order n and size $\text{?(}\text{(n+k)}{}^2\text{8}\text{?}$.     

Lower bounds on the independence number in terms of the degrees

Wei discovered that the independence number of a graph G is at least Σ_v(1 + d(v))^?1. It is proved here that if G is a connected triangle-free graph on n ≥ 3 vertices and if G is neither an odd cycle nor an odd path, then the bound above can be increased by $\text{n}\text{Δ(Δ + 1)}$, where Δ is the maximum degree. This new bound is sharp for even cycles and for three other graphs. These results relate nicely to some algorithms for finding large independent sets. They also have a natural matrix theory interpretation. A survey of other known lower bounds on the independence number is presented.     

On the chromatic forcing number of a random graph

When we wish to compute lower bounds for the chromatic number χ(G) of a graph G, it is of interest to know something about the ‘chromatic forcing number’ f_χ(G), which is defined to be the least number of vertices in a subgraph H of G such that χ(H) = χ(G). We show here that for random graphs G_n,p with n vertices, f_χ(G_n,p) is almost surely at least ($\text{1}\text{2}$?ε)n, despite say the fact that the largest complete subgraph of G_n,p has only about log n vertices.     

Harmonic analysis on unitary groups

A theory of harmonic analysis on a metric group (G, d) is developed with the model of U$\text{U}$, the unitary group of a C¹-algebra $\text{U}$, in mind. Essential in this development is the set $\text{G}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{d}}$ of contractive, irreducible representations of G, and its concomitant set P_d(G) of positive-definite functions. It is shown that $\text{G}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{d}}$ is compact and closed in $\text{G}\text{?}$. The set $\text{G}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{d}}$ is determined in a number of cases, in particular when G = U($\text{U}$) with $\text{U}$ abelian. If $\text{U}$ is an AW¹-algebra, it is shown that $\text{G}\text{?}$_d is essentially the same as $\text{U}\text{?}$. Unitary groups are characterised in terms of a certain Lie algebra $\text{g}$_u and several characterisations of G = U($\text{U}$) when $\text{U}$ is abelian are given.     

Cogrowth and amenability of discrete groups

Let G be a group and g₁,…, g_t a set of generators. There are approximately (2t ? 1)ⁿ reduced words in g₁,…, g_t, of length ?n. Let $\text{}\text{?}\text{gg}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$ be the number of those which represent 1_G. We show that $\text{γ =}\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n\; \to \; \infty }}\text{(}\text{}\text{?}\text{gg}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>n</mtext>}}$ exists. Clearly 1 ? γ ? 2t ? 1. $\text{η =}\text{(}\text{log}\text{γ)}\text{(}\text{log}\text{(2t ? 1))}$ is the cogrowth. 0 ? η ? 1. In fact $\text{η ∈ {0} ∪ (}\text{1}\text{2}\text{, 1¦}$. The entropic dimension of G is shown to be 1 ? η. It is then proved that d(G) = 1 if and only if G is free on g₁,…, g_t and d(G) = 0 if and only if G is amenable.     

On the chromatic index of multigraphs without large triangles

Let M be a multigraph. Vizing (Kibernetika (Kiev)1 (1965), 29–39) proved that χ′(M)≤Δ(M)+μ(M). Here it is proved that if χ′(M)≥Δ(M)+s, where $\text{1}\text{2}\text{(μ(M) + 1) < s}$ then M contains a 2s-sided triangle. In particular, (C′) if μ(M)≤2 and M does not contain a 4-sided triangle then χ′(M)≤Δ(M) + 1. Javedekar (J. Graph Theory4 (1980), 265–268) had conjectured that (C) if G is a simple graph that does not induce K_1,3 or K₅?e then χ(G)≤ω(G) + 1. The author and Schmerl (Discrete Math.45 (1983), 277–285) proved that (C′) implies (C); thus Javedekar's conjecture is true.     

On k-sequential and other numbered graphs

The concept of a k-sequential graph is presented as follows. A graph G with ∣V(G)∪ E(G)∣=t is called k-sequential if there is a bijection$\text{?: V(G)∪E(G) → {k,k+1,…,t+k?1}}$ such that for each edge$\text{e}\text{?}\text{=xy}$in E(G) one has$\text{?(}\text{e}\text{?}\text{) = ∣?(x)??(y)∣}$. A graph that is 1-sequential is called simply sequential, and, in particular the author has conjectured that all trees are simply sequential. In this paper an introductory study of k-sequential graphs is made. Further, several variations on the problems of gracefully or sequentially numbering the elements of a graph are discussed.     

Bounds for sorting by prefix reversal

For a permutation σ of the integers from 1 to n, let ?(σ) be the smallest number of prefix reversals that will transform σ to the identity permutation, and let ?(n) be the largest such ?(σ) for all σ in (the symmetric group) S_n. We show that $\text{?(n)?}\text{(5n+5)}\text{3}$, and that $\text{?(n)?}\text{17n}\text{16}$ for n a multiple of 16. If, furthermore, each integer is required to participate in an even number of reversed prefixes, the corresponding function g(n) is shown to obey $\text{3n}\text{2?1}\text{?g(n)?2n+3}$.     

Rational matrix groups of a special type

Let G be a finite group having a faithful irreducible character χ for which χ(1) is prime to ¦G¦/χ(1). Let n=[$\text{Q}$(χ):$\text{Q}$]χ(1), and assume that the factors are not both even. Then G can be embedded in GL_n($\text{Q}$) in such a way that its normalizer therein splits over its centralizer.     

Some existence and nonexistence theorems for solutions of degenerate parabolic equations

The initial and boundary value problem for the degenerate parabolic equation v_t = Δ(?(v)) + F(v) in the cylinder $\text{Ω × ¦0, ∞), Ω ? R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ bounded, for a certain class of point functions ? satisfying ?′(v) ? 0 (e.g., $\text{?(v) = ¦v¦}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{sign}\text{v}$) is considered. In the case that F(v) sign $\text{v ? C(1 + ¦?(v)¦}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{), α < 1}$, the equation has a global time solution. The same is true for α = 1 provided the measure of Ω is sufficiently small. In the case that $\text{F(v)}\text{?(v)}$ is nondecreasing a condition is given on the initial state v(x, 0) which implies that the solution must blow up in finite time. The existence of such initial states is discussed.     

Rectangular arrays

In this paper we studied m×n arrays with row sums $\text{nr}\text{(n,m)}$ and column sums $\text{mr}\text{(n,m)}$ where (n,m) denotes the greatest common divisor of m and n. We were able to show that the function H_m,n(r), which enumerates m×n arrays with row sums and column sums $\text{nr}\text{(m,n)}$ and $\text{mr}\text{(n,m)}$ respectively, is a polynomial in r of degree (m?1)(n?1). We found simple formulas to evaluate these polynomials for negative values, ?r, and we show that certain small negative integers are roots of these polynomials. When we considered the generating function G_m,n(y) = Σ_r?0H_m,n(r)y^r, it was found to be rational of degree less than zero. The denominator of G_m,n(y) is of the form (1?y)^(m?1)(n?1)+3, and the coefficients of the numerator are non-negative integers which enjoy a certain symmetric relation.     

Lower bounds for the distributions of certain multivariate test statistics

A lower (upper) bound is given for the distribution of each d_j, j = k + 1, …, p (j = 1, …, s), the jth latent root of AB^?1, where A and B are independent noncentral and central Wishart matrices having $\text{W}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{(q, Σ; Ω)}$ with rank $\text{(Ω) ≤ k = p ? s}$ and W_p(n, Σ), respectively. Similar bound are also given for the distributions of noncentral means and canonical correlations. The results are applied to obtain lower bounds for the null distributions of some multivariate test statistics in Tintner's model, MANOVA and canonical analysis.     

Continuity properties of the averaging projection onto the set of Hankel matrices

Some continuity properties of the averaging projection $\text{P}$ onto the set of Hankel matrices are investigated. It is proved that this projection is of weak type (1, 1) which means that for any nuclear operator T the s-numbers of $\text{P}$T satisfy S_n($\text{P}$T) ? const(n + 1). As a consequence it is obtained that $\text{P}$ maps the Matsaev ideal $\text{G}$_ω = {T:∑_n?0S_n(T)(2n + 1)^?1 < ∞} into the set of compact operators.     

Construction of translation planes from t-spread sets

A t-spread set [1] is a set $\text{C}$ of (t + 1) × (t + 1) matrices over GF(q) such that ∥C∥ = q^t+1, 0 ? C, I?C, and det(X ? Y) ≠ 0 if X and Y are distinct elements of $\text{C}$. The amount of computation involved in constructing t-spread sets is considerable, and the following construction technique reduces somewhat this computation. Construction: Let $\text{G}$ be a subgroup of GL(t + 1, q), (the non-singular (t + 1) × (t + 1) matrices over GF(q)), such that ∥G∥|a^t+1, and det (G ? H) ≠ 0 if G and H are distinct elements of $\text{G}$. Let A₁, A₂, …, A_n?GL(t + 1, q) such that det(A_i ? G) ≠ 0 for i = 1, …, n and all G?G, and det(A_i ? A_jG) ≠ 0 for i > j and all G?G. Let $\text{C = \&{0\&} ∪ G ∪ A}{}_1\text{G ∪ … ∪ A}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{G}$, and ∥C∥ = q^t+1. Then $\text{C}$ is a t-spread set. A t-spread set can be used to define a left V ? W system over V(t + 1, q) as follows: x + y is the vector sum; let e?V(t + 1, q), then xoy = yM(x) where M(x) is the unique element of $\text{C}$ with x = eM(x). Theorem: Let$\text{C}$be a t-spread set and F the associatedV ? Wsystem; the left nucleus = {y | CM(y) = C}, and the middle nucleus = }y | M(y)C = C}. Theorem: For$\text{C}$constructed as aboveG ? {M(x) | x?N_λ}. This construction technique has been applied to construct a V ? W system of order 25 with ∥N_λ∥ = 6, and ∥N_μ∥ = 4. This system coordinatizes a new projective plane.     

On graphs with equal edge connectivity and minimum degree

The note contains some conditions on a graph implying that the edge connectivity is equal to the minimum degree. One of these conditions is that if d₁?d₂???d_n is the degree sequence then ∑^l_l?1(d₁+d_n?1)>In?1 for $\text{1 ? l? min {}\text{n}\text{2?1}\text{, d}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{}}$.     

The asymptotic distribution of weighted empirical distribution functions

Let G_n denote the empirical distribution based on n independent uniform (0, 1) random variables. The asymptotic distribution of the supremum of weighted discrepancies between G_n(u) and u of the forms 6w_v(u)D_n(u)6 and 6w_v(G_n(u))D_n(u)6, where D_n(u) = G_n(u)?u, w_v(u) = (u(1?u))^?1+v and 0 ? v < $\text{1}\text{2}$ is obtained. Goodness-of-fit tests based on these statistics are shown to be asymptotically sensitive only in the extreme tails of a distribution, which is exactly where such statistics that use a weight function w_v with $\text{1}\text{2}$ ? v ? 1 are insensitive. For this reason weighted discrepancies which use the weight function w_v with 0 ? v < $\text{1}\text{2}$ are potentially applicable in the construction of confidence contours for the extreme tails of a distribution.