Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution at Benzene with Powerful Strontium Hydride and Alkyl Complexes

Key to the isolation of the first alkyl strontium complex was the synthesis of a strontium hydride complex that is stable towards ligand exchange reactions. This goal was achieved by using the super bulky β‐diketiminate ligand ^DIPePBDI (CH[C(Me)N‐DIPeP]₂, DIPeP=2,6‐diisopentylphenyl). Reaction of ^DIPePBDI‐H with Sr[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ gave (^DIPePBDI)SrN(SiMe₃)₂, which was converted with PhSiH₃ into [(^DIPePBDI)SrH]₂. Dissolved in C₆D₆, the strontium hydride complex is stable up to 70 °C. At 60 °C, H–D isotope exchange gave full conversion into [(^DIPePBDI)SrD]₂ and C₆D₅H. Since H–D exchange with D₂ is facile, the strontium hydride complex served as a catalyst for the deuteration of C₆H₆ by D₂. Reaction of [(^DIPePBDI)SrH]₂ with ethylene gave [(^DIPePBDI)SrEt]₂. The high reactivity of this alkyl strontium complex is demonstrated by facile ethylene polymerization and nucleophilic aromatic substitution with C₆D₆, giving alkylated aromatic products and [(^DIPePBDI)SrD]₂.     

Diverse Reactivity of a Ca(I) Synthon

Low-valent Mg^I complexes like (BDI)Mg−Mg(BDI) have found wide-spread application as specialty reducing agents (BDI=β-diketiminate). Also their redox reactivity was extensively investigated. In contrast, attempts to isolate similar Ca^I complexes led to reduction of the aromatic solvents or N₂. Complex (^DIPePBDI)Ca(μ₆,μ₆-C₆H₆)Ca(^DIPePBDI) ( VIII ) should be regarded a Ca^II complex with a bridging C₆H₆²⁻ dianion (^DIPePBDI=HC[C(Me)N-DIPeP]₂, DIPeP=2,6-C(H)Et₂-phenyl). It can react as a Ca^I synthon by releasing benzene and two electrons. Herein we describe the reactivity of VIII with benzene, biphenyl, naphthalene, anthracene, COT, Ph₃SiCl, PhSiH₃, a (BDI)AlI₂ complex, H₂, PhX (X=F, Cl, Br, I), tBuOH and tBuCH₂I. The C₆H₆²⁻ dianion in VIII can react as a 2e⁻ source, a nucleophile or a Brønsted base. In some cases radical reactivity cannot be excluded. Crystal structures of (^DIPePBDI)Ca(μ₈,μ₈-COT)Ca(^DIPePBDI) ( 1 ) and [(^DIPePBDI)CaX ⋅ (THF)]₂ (X=F, Cl, Br, I) ( 2 – 5 ) are described.     

Alkaline-Earth Metal Mediated Benzene-to-Biphenyl Coupling

Complex [(^DIPePBDI)Ca]₂(C₆H₆), with a C₆H₆²⁻ dianion bridging two Ca²⁺ ions, reacts with benzene to yield [(^DIPePBDI)Ca]₂(biphenyl) with a bridging biphenyl²⁻ dianion (^DIPePBDI=HC[C(Me)N-DIPeP]₂; DIPeP=2,6-CH(Et)₂-phenyl). The biphenyl complex was also prepared by reacting [(^DIPePBDI)Ca]₂(C₆H₆) with biphenyl or by reduction of [(^DIPePBDI)CaI]₂ with KC₈ in presence of biphenyl. Benzene-benzene coupling was also observed when the deep purple product of ball-milling [(^DIPPBDI)CaI(THF)]₂ with K/KI was extracted with benzene (DIPP=2,6-CH(Me)₂-phenyl) giving crystalline [(^DIPPBDI)Ca(THF)]₂(biphenyl) (52 % yield). Reduction of [(^DIPePBDI)SrI]₂ with KC₈ gave highly labile [(^DIPePBDI)Sr]₂(C₆H₆) as a black powder (61 % yield) which reacts rapidly and selectively with benzene to [(^DIPePBDI)Sr]₂(biphenyl). DFT calculations show that the most likely route for biphenyl formation is a pathway in which the C₆H₆²⁻ dianion attacks neutral benzene. This is facilitated by metal-benzene coordination.     

Boosting Low‐Valent Aluminum(I) Reactivity with a Potassium Reagent

The reagent RK [R=CH(SiMe₃)₂ or N(SiMe₃)₂] was expected to react with the low‐valent (^DIPPBDI)Al (^DIPPBDI=HC[C(Me)N(DIPP)]₂, DIPP=2,6‐iPr‐phenyl) to give [(^DIPPBDI)AlR]^?K⁺. However, deprotonation of the Me group in the ligand backbone was observed and [H₂C=C(N‐DIPP)?C(H)=C(Me)?N?DIPP]Al^?K⁺ ( 1 ) crystallized as a bright‐yellow product (73 %). Like most anionic Al^I complexes, 1 forms a dimer in which formally negatively charged Al centers are bridged by K⁺ ions, showing strong K⁺???DIPP interactions. The rather short Al–K bonds [3.499(1)–3.588(1) Å] indicate tight bonding of the dimer. According to DOSY NMR analysis, 1 is dimeric in C₆H₆ and monomeric in THF, but slowly reacts with both solvents. In reaction with C₆H₆, two C?H bond activations are observed and a product with a para‐phenylene moiety was exclusively isolated. DFT calculations confirm that the Al center in 1 is more reactive than that in (^DIPPBDI)Al. Calculations show that both Al^I and K⁺ work in concert and determines the reactivity of 1 .     

Unsupported Mg–Alkene Bonding

The first intermolecular early main group metal–alkene complexes were isolated. This was enabled by using highly Lewis acidic Mg centers in the Lewis base-free cations (^MeBDI)Mg⁺ and (^tBuBDI)Mg⁺ with B(C₆F₅)₄⁻ counterions (^MeBDI=CH[C(CH₃)N(DIPP)]₂, ^tBuBDI=CH[C(tBu)N(DIPP)]₂, DIPP=2,6-diisopropylphenyl). Coordination complexes with various mono- and bis-alkene ligands, typically used in transition metal chemistry, were structurally characterized for 1,3-divinyltetramethyldisiloxane, 1,5-cyclooctadiene, cyclooctene, 1,3,5-cycloheptatriene, 2,3-dimethylbuta-1,3-diene, and 2-ethyl-1-butene. In all cases, asymmetric Mg–alkene bonding with a short and a long Mg−C bond is observed. This asymmetry is most extreme for Mg–(H₂C=CEt₂) bonding. In bromobenzene solution, the Mg–alkene complexes are either dissociated or in a dissociation equilibrium. A DFT study and AIM analysis showed that the C=C bonds hardly change on coordination and there is very little alkene→Mg electron transfer. The Mg–alkene bonds are mainly electrostatic and should be described as Mg²⁺ ion-induced dipole interactions.     

Calcium‐Catalyzed Arene C−H Bond Activation by Low‐Valent AlI

The low‐valent ß‐diketiminate complex (^DIPPBDI)Al is stable in benzene but addition of catalytic quantities of [(^DIPPBDI)CaH]₂ at 20 °C led to (^DIPPBDI)Al(Ph)H (^DIPPBDI=CH[C(CH₃)N‐DIPP]₂, DIPP=2,6‐diisopropylphenyl). Similar Ca‐catalyzed C?H bond activation is demonstrated for toluene or p‐xylene. For toluene a remarkable selectivity for meta‐functionalization has been observed. Reaction of (^DIPPBDI)Al(m‐tolyl)H with I₂ gave m‐tolyl iodide, H₂ and (^DIPPBDI)AlI₂ which was recycled to (^DIPPBDI)Al. Attempts to catalyze this reaction with Mg or Zn hydride catalysts failed. Instead, the highly stable complexes (^DIPPBDI)Al(H)M(^DIPPBDI) (M=Mg, Zn) were formed. DFT calculations on the Ca hydride catalyzed arene alumination suggest that a similar but more loosely bound complex is formed: (^DIPPBDI)Al(H)Ca(^DIPPBDI). This is in equilibrium with the hydride bridged complex (^DIPPBDI)Al(μ‐H)Ca(^DIPPBDI) which shows strongly increased electron density at Al. The combination of Ca‐arene bonding and a highly nucleophilic Al center are key to facile C?H bond activation.     

Boosting Low-Valent Aluminum(I) Reactivity with a Potassium Reagent

The reagent RK [R=CH(SiMe₃)₂ or N(SiMe₃)₂] was expected to react with the low-valent (^DIPPBDI)Al (^DIPPBDI=HC[C(Me)N(DIPP)]₂, DIPP=2,6-iPr-phenyl) to give [(^DIPPBDI)AlR]⁻K⁺. However, deprotonation of the Me group in the ligand backbone was observed and [H₂C=C(N-DIPP)−C(H)=C(Me)−N−DIPP]Al⁻K⁺ ( 1 ) crystallized as a bright-yellow product (73 %). Like most anionic Al^I complexes, 1 forms a dimer in which formally negatively charged Al centers are bridged by K⁺ ions, showing strong K⁺⋅⋅⋅DIPP interactions. The rather short Al–K bonds [3.499(1)–3.588(1) Å] indicate tight bonding of the dimer. According to DOSY NMR analysis, 1 is dimeric in C₆H₆ and monomeric in THF, but slowly reacts with both solvents. In reaction with C₆H₆, two C−H bond activations are observed and a product with a para-phenylene moiety was exclusively isolated. DFT calculations confirm that the Al center in 1 is more reactive than that in (^DIPPBDI)Al. Calculations show that both Al^I and K⁺ work in concert and determines the reactivity of 1 .     

Cationic Aluminium Complexes as Catalysts for Imine Hydrogenation

Strongly Lewis acidic cationic aluminium complexes, stabilized by β–diketiminate (BDI) ligands and free of Lewis bases, have been prepared as their B(C₆F₅)₄⁻ salts and were investigated for catalytic activity in imine hydrogenation. The backbone (R1) and N (R2) substituents on the ^R1,R2BDI ligand (^R1,R2BDI=HC[C(R1)N(R2)]₂) influence sterics and Lewis acidity. Ligand bulk increases along the row ^Me,DIPPBDI<^Me,DIPePBDI≈^tBu,DIPPBDI<^tBu,DIPePBDI; DIPP=2,6-C(H)Me₂-phenyl, DIPeP=2,6-C(H)Et₂-phenyl. The Gutmann-Beckett test showed acceptor numbers of: (^tBu,DIPPBDI)AlMe⁺ 85.6, (^tBu,DIPePBDI)AlMe⁺ 85.9, (^Me,DIPPBDI)AlMe⁺ 89.7, (^Me,DIPePBDI)AlMe⁺ 90.8, (^Me,DIPPBDI)AlH⁺ 95.3. Steric and electronic factors need to be balanced for catalytic activity in imine hydrogenation. Open, highly Lewis acidic, cations strongly coordinate imine rendering it inactive as a Frustrated Lewis Pair (FLP). The bulkiest cations do not coordinate imine but its combination is also not an active catalyst. The cation (^tBu,DIPPBDI)AlMe⁺ shows the best catalytic activity for various imines and is also an active catalyst for the Tishchenko reaction of benzaldehyde to benzylbenzoate. DFT calculations on the mechanism of imine hydrogenation catalysed by cationic Al complexes reveal two interconnected catalytic cycles operating in concert. Hydrogen is activated either by FLP reactivity of an Al⋅⋅⋅imine couple or, after formation of significant quantities of amine, by reaction with an Al⋅⋅⋅amine couple. The latter autocatalytic Al⋅⋅⋅amine cycle is energetically favoured.     

Tridentate anilido‐aldimine magnesium and zinc complexes as efficient catalysts for ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone and L‐lactide

A novel tridentate anilido‐aldimine ligand, [o‐C₆H₄(NHAr)? HC?NCH₂CH₂NMe₂] (Ar = 2,6‐ⁱPr₂C₆H₃, L ‐H, 1 ), has been prepared by the condensation of N, N‐dimethylethylenediamine with one molar equivalent of 2‐fluoro‐benzaldehyde in hexane, followed by the addition of the lithium salt of diisopropylaniline in THF. Magnesium (Mg) and zinc (Zn) complexes supported by the tridentate anilido‐aldimine ligand have been synthesized and structurally characterized. Reaction of L ‐H ( 1 ) with an equivalent amount of MgⁿBu₂ or ZnEt₂ produces the monomeric complex [ L MgⁿBu] ( 2 ) or [ L ZnEt] ( 3 ), respectively. Experimental results show that complexes 2 and 3 are efficient catalysts for ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone (CL) and L ‐lactide (LA) in the presence of benzyl alcohol and catalyze the polymerization of ε‐CL and L ‐LA in a controlled fashion yielding polymers with a narrow polydispersity index. In both polymerizations, the activity of Mg complex 2 is higher than that of Zn complex 3 , which is probably due to the higher Lewis acidity and better oxophilic nature of Mg²⁺ metal. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 4927–4936, 2009     

Hexa­aqua­magnesium(II) bis­[N‐(6‐amino‐3,4‐di­hydro‐3‐methyl‐5‐nitro­so‐4‐oxopyrimidin‐2‐yl)­glycinate] dihydrate

The analysis of the title compound, [Mg(H₂O)₆](C₇H₈N₅O₄)₂·2H₂O, continues our study of the reactivity of metal ions with N‐protected amino acids. The Mg ion lies on an inversion centre with Mg—O 2.0437 (10)‐2.0952 (10) Å. The [Mg(H₂O)₆]²⁺cations, anions and water mol­ecules are linked by an extensive hydrogen‐bond network.     

Complexation and Versatile Reactivity of a Highly Lewis Acidic Cationic Mg Complex with Alkynes and Phosphines

[(BDI)Mg⁺][B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 1 ; BDI=CH[C(CH₃)NDipp]₂; Dipp=2,6-diisopropylphenyl) was prepared by reaction of (BDI)MgnPr with [Ph₃C⁺][B(C₆F₅)₄⁻]. Addition of 3-hexyne gave [(BDI)Mg⁺ ⋅ (EtC≡CEt)][B(C₆F₅)₄⁻]. Single-crystal X-ray analysis, NMR investigations, Raman spectra, and DFT calculations indicate a significant Mg-alkyne interaction. Addition of the terminal alkynes PhC≡CH or Me₃SiC≡CH led to alkyne deprotonation by the BDI ligand to give [(BDI-H)Mg⁺(C≡CPh)]₂ ⋅ 2 [B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 2 , 70 %) and [(BDI-H)Mg⁺(C≡CSiMe₃)]₂ ⋅ 2 [B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 3 , 63 %). Addition of internal alkynes PhC≡CPh or PhC≡CMe led to [4+2] cycloadditions with the BDI ligand to give {Mg⁺C(Ph)=C(Ph)C[C(Me)=NDipp]₂}₂ ⋅ 2 [B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 4 , 53 %) and {Mg⁺C(Ph)=C(Me)C[C(Me)=NDipp]₂}₂ ⋅ 2 [B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 5 , 73 %), in which the Mg center is N,N,C-chelated. The (BDI)Mg⁺ cation can be viewed as an intramolecular frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) with a Lewis acidic site (Mg) and a Lewis (or Brønsted) basic site (BDI). Reaction of [(BDI)Mg⁺][B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 1 ) with a range of phosphines varying in bulk and donor strength generated [(BDI)Mg⁺ ⋅ PPh₃][B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 6 ), [(BDI)Mg⁺ ⋅ PCy₃][B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 7 ), and [(BDI)Mg⁺ ⋅ PtBu₃][B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] ( 8 ). The bulkier phosphine PMes₃ (Mes=mesityl) did not show any interaction. Combinations of [(BDI)Mg⁺][B(C₆F₅)₄⁻] and phosphines did not result in addition to the triple bond in 3-hexyne, but during the screening process it was discovered that the cationic magnesium complex catalyzes the hydrophosphination of PhC≡CH with HPPh₂, for which an FLP-type mechanism is tentatively proposed.     

Magnesium–halobenzene bonding: mapping the halogen sigma-hole with a Lewis-acidic complex

Complexes of the Lewis base-free cations (^MeBDI)Mg⁺ and (^tBuBDI)Mg⁺ with Ph–X ligands (X = F, Cl, Br, I) have been studied (^MeBDI = HC[C(Me)N-DIPP]₂ and ^tBuBDI = HC[C(tBu)N-DIPP]₂; DIPP = 2,6-diisopropylphenyl). For the smaller β-diketiminate ligand (^MeBDI) only complexes with PhF could be isolated. Heavier Ph–X ligands could not compete with bonding of Mg to the weakly coordinating anion B(C₆F₅)₄⁻. For the cations with the bulkier ^tBuBDI ligand, the full series of halobenzene complexes was structurally characterized. Crystal structures show that the Mg⋯X–Ph angle strongly decreases with the size of X: F 139.1°, Cl 101.4°, Br 97.7°, I 95.1°. This trend, which is supported by DFT calculations, can be explained with the σ-hole which increases from F to I. Charge calculation and Atoms-In-Molecules analyses show that Mg⋯F–Ph bonding originates from electrostatic attraction between Mg²⁺ and the very polar C^δ+–F^δ− bond. For the heavier halobenzenes, polarization of the halogen atom becomes increasingly important (Cl < Br < I). Complexation with Mg leads in all cases to significant Ph–X bond activation and elongation. This unusual coordination of halogenated species to early main group metals is therefore relevant to C–X bond breaking.

Complexes of a highly Lewis acidic Mg cation and the full series of Ph–X (X = F, Cl, Br, I) have been structurally characterized. The Mg⋯X–Ph angle decreases with halogen size on account of the growing halogen σ-hole.     

Dichloro[1,1′‐(5,9‐dithia‐2,12‐diazoniatrideca‐1,12‐diene‐1,13‐diyl)dinaphthalen‐2‐olato‐κ2O,O′]dimethyltin(IV) acetonitrile solvate

Reaction of the potentially hexadentate ligand 1,9‐bis(2‐hydroxy‐1‐naphthalene­methyl­imino)‐3,7‐di­thia­nonane with di­methyl­tin chloride gave the title 1:1 adduct, in which the long ligand wraps around the SnCl₂Me₂ unit and in which the stereochemistry is fully trans. This compound crystallizes from aceto­nitrile as the 1:1 solvate [Sn(CH₃)₂(C₂₉H₃₀N₂­O₂S₂)Cl₂]·­C₂H₃N. During the reaction, the hydroxyl protons move to the N atoms. Most of the chemically equivalent bond lengths agree to within experimental uncertainty, but the Sn—Cl bond that is inside the ligand pocket is substantially longer than the Sn—Cl bond that points away from the long ligand [2.668 (1) versus 2.528 (1) Å]. The O—Sn—O angle is 166.0 (1)°. Comparison of the Sn—O, C—O and aryl C—C bond lengths with those of related compounds shows that the most important resonance forms for the Schiff base aryl­oxide ligand are double zwitterions, but that the uncharged resonance forms having carbonyl groups also contribute significantly.     

Polymeric [dihydrobis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borato]potassium(I) and three dihydrobis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borate–magnesium(I) compounds obtained by disproportionation of the Grignard reagent

Reaction of the Grignard reagent with polydentate nitrogen‐donor ligands yields new species with rare magnesium coordination and possible catalytic activity. In the first of the title compounds, poly[[μ₄‐dihydrobis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borato‐κ²N,N′]potassium(I)], [K(C₆H₈BN₄)]_n, (I), polymeric chains form a two‐dimensional network in the [100] plane. Each potassium ion is coordinated by four N atoms of pyrazolyl ligands, while weak (μ‐BH)...K⁺ interactions additionally stabilize the structure. The K and B atoms both lie on a mirror plane. In three new structures obtained by disproportionation of the Grignard reagent, each Mg atom is bound to a κ²N,N′‐type ligand, forming the basal plane, and tetrahydrofuran molecules occupy the axial positions. Di‐μ‐chlorido‐bis[dihydridobis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borato]tris(tetrahydrofuran)dimagnesium(II), [Mg₂(C₆H₈BN₄)₂Cl₂(C₄H₈O)₃], (II), adopts a dimeric structure with μ‐Cl—Mg interactions. One of the Mg atoms has an octahedral coordination, while the other has a distorted square‐pyramidal environment. However, in the bis‐chelate compounds bis[dihydridobis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borato‐κ²N,N′](tetrahydrofuran‐κO)magnesium(II), [Mg(C₆H₈BN₄)₂(C₄H₈O)], (III), and bis[dihydridobis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borato‐κ²N,N′]bis(tetrahydrofuran‐κO)magnesium(II), [Mg(C₆H₈BN₄)₂(C₄H₈O)₂], (IV), the Mg atoms have square‐pyramidal and octahedral environments, respectively. The Mg atom in (IV) lies on an inversion centre.     

Silicon–oxygen bonding on diphenylsilane through palladium(II)‐catalysed reactions

The reactions of phenols with diphenylsilane are catalysed by palladium(II) catalysts such as Pd(TMEDA)Cl₂ (TMEDA = tetramethylethylenediamine), Pd(DEED)Cl₂ (DEED = N,N′‐diethylethylenediamine), Pd(TEEDA)Cl₂ (TEEDA = N,N′‐tetraethylethylenediamine) or PdCl₂ to form hydrated silanols with molecular formula Ph₂Si(OR)OH·nH₂O (when R = C₆H₅, n = 3; when R = p‐CH₃C₆H₄ or o‐CH₃C₆H₄, n = 1). The reaction of hydroquinone with diphenylsilane in the presence of catalytic amounts of Pd(TMEDA)Cl₂ forms an Si–O‐bonded hydrated aggregate of composition [(C₆H₅)₂Si(OC₆H₄O).0.5H₂0] _n. p‐Benzoquinone reacted with diphenylsilane in the presence of a catalytic amount of Pd(TMEDA)Cl₂ and the reaction proceeded via a multiple pathway involving quinhydrone as an intermediate charge‐transfer complex which reacted further with diphenylsilane to give a linear siloxane. Copyright ­© 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Group II Metal Complexes of the Germylidendiide Dianion Radical and Germylidenide Anion

The two‐electron reduction of a Group 14‐element(I) complex [RË?] (E=Ge, R=supporting ligand) to form a novel low‐valent dianion radical with the composition [RË:]^{. 2?} is reported. The reaction of [LGeCl] ( 1 , L=2,6‐(CH?NAr)₂C₆H₃, Ar=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃) with excess calcium in THF at room temperature afforded the germylidenediide dianion radical complex [LGe]^{. 2?}?Ca(THF)₃²⁺ ( 2 ). The reaction proceeds through the formation of the germanium(I) radical [LGe?], which then undergoes a two‐electron reduction with calcium to form 2 . EPR spectroscopy, X‐ray crystallography, and theoretical studies show that the germanium center in 2 has two lone pairs of electrons and the radical is delocalized over the germanium‐containing heterocycle. In contrast, the magnesium derivative of the germylidendiide dianion radical is unstable and undergoes dimerization with concurrent dearomatization to form the germylidenide anion complex [C₆H₃‐2‐{C(H)?NAr}Ge‐Mg‐6‐{C(H)‐NAr}]₂ ( 3 ).     

Enhanced π‐back‐donation resulting in the trans labilization of a pyridine ligand in an N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) PdII precatalyst: a case study

The molecular structure of the benzimidazol‐2‐ylidene–PdCl₂–pyridine‐type PEPPSI (pyridine‐enhanced precatalyst, preparation, stabilization and initiation) complex {1,3‐bis[2‐(diisopropylamino)ethyl]benzimidazol‐2‐ylidene‐κC²}dichlorido(pyridine‐κN)palladium(II), [PdCl₂(C₅H₅N)(C₂₃H₄₀N₄)], has been characterized by elemental analysis, IR and NMR spectroscopy, and natural bond orbital (NBO) and charge decomposition analysis (CDA). Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) searches were used to understand the structural characteristics of the PEPPSI complexes in comparison with the usual N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) complexes. The presence of weak C—H…Cl‐type hydrogen‐bond and π–π stacking interactions between benzene rings were verified using NCI plots and Hirshfeld surface analysis. The preferred method in the CDA of PEPPSI complexes is to separate their geometries into only two fragments, i.e. the bulky NHC ligand and the remaining fragment. In this study, the geometry of the PEPPSI complex is separated into five fragments, namely benzimidazol‐2‐ylidene (Bimy), two chlorides, pyridine (Py) and the Pd^II ion. Thus, the individual roles of the Pd atom and the Py ligand in the donation and back‐donation mechanisms have been clearly revealed. The NHC ligand in the PEPPSI complex in this study acts as a strong σ‐donor with a considerable amount of π‐back‐donation from Pd to C_carbene. The electron‐poor character of Pd^II is supported by π‐back‐donation from the Pd centre and the weakness of the Pd—N(Py) bond. According to CSD searches, Bimy ligands in PEPPSI complexes have a stronger σ‐donating ability than imidazol‐2‐ylidene ligands in PEPPSI complexes.     

Reversible Oxidative Addition of Zinc Hydride at a Gallium(I)-Centre: Labile Mono- and Bis(hydridogallyl)zinc Complexes

In the presence of TMEDA (N,N,N’,N’-tetramethylethylenediamine), partially deaggregated zinc dihydride as hydrocarbon suspensions react with the gallium(I) compound [(BDI)Ga] ( I , BDI={HC(C(CH₃)N(2,6-iPr₂-C₆H₃))₂}⁻) by formal oxidative addition of a Zn−H bond to the gallium(I) centre. Dissociation of the labile TMEDA ligand in the resulting complex [(BDI)Ga(H)−(H)Zn(tmeda)] ( 1 ) facilitates insertion of a second equiv. of I into the remaining Zn−H to form a thermally sensitive trinuclear species [{(BDI)Ga(H)}₂Zn] ( 2 ). Compound 1 exchanges with polymeric zinc dideuteride [ZnD₂]_n in the presence of TMEDA, and with compounds I and 2 via sequential and reversible ligand dissociation and gallium(I) insertion. Spectroscopic and computational studies demonstrate the reversibility of oxidative addition of each Zn−H bond to the gallium(I) centres.     

(6‐Oxido‐2‐oxo‐1,2‐dihydropyrimidine‐5‐carboxylato‐κ2O5,O6)bis[2‐(2‐pyridyl)‐1H‐benzimidazole‐κ2N2,N3]manganese(II) monohydrate

In the title compound, [Mn(C₅H₂N₂O₄)(C₁₂H₉N₃)₂]·H₂O, the Mn^II centre is surrounded by three bidentate chelating ligands, namely, one 6‐oxido‐2‐oxo‐1,2‐dihydropyrimidine‐5‐carboxylate (or uracil‐5‐carboxylate, Huca²⁻) ligand [Mn—O = 2.136 (2) and 2.156 (3) Å] and two 2‐(2‐pyridyl)‐1H‐benzimidazole (Hpybim) ligands [Mn—N = 2.213 (3)–2.331 (3) Å], and it displays a severely distorted octahedral geometry, with cis angles ranging from 73.05 (10) to 105.77 (10)°. Intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds both between the Hpybim and the Huca²⁻ ligands and between the Huca²⁻ ligands link the molecules into infinite chains. The lattice water molecule acts as a hydrogen‐bond donor to form double O...H—O—H...O hydrogen bonds with the Huca²⁻ O atoms, crosslinking the chains to afford an infinite two‐dimensional sheet; a third hydrogen bond (N—H...O) formed by the water molecule as a hydrogen‐bond acceptor and a Hpybim N atom further links these sheets to yield a three‐dimensional supramolecular framework. Possible partial π–π stacking interactions involving the Hpybim rings are also observed in the crystal structure.     

Hemi[hexa­aqua­magnesium(II)] (μ‐2,6‐bis{[bis­(carboxyl­ato­methyl)­amino]­methyl}‐4‐chloro­phenolato)­bis­[di­aqua­magnesium(II)] decahydrate

The crystal structure of the title compound, [Mg(H₂O)₆]_0.5[Mg₂(C₁₆H₁₄ClN₂O₉)(H₂O)₄]·10H₂O, shows that this bi­nuclear complex consists of two Mg centres in distorted octahedral geometry, joined by an oxo bridge which is a derivative of the deprotoned hydroxy group of the phenolate in the ligand mol­ecule. In the anion, the coordination sphere of each Mg^II ion is completed by two carboxyl­ates, a tertiary N atom and two water mol­ecules. The inner coordination spheres for the Mg^II ions are very similar, both in ligand sets and in geometry. Each unit of the binuclear complex has one negative charge neutralized by a neighbouring hydrated cation, [Mg(H₂O)₆]²⁺, in which the Mg atom lies on an inversion centre. In each cell, there are 34 water mol­ecules and most of them participate in the formation of hydrogen bonds, which contribute greatly to the stability of the whole structure.