Dynamic Assembly Inclusion Complexes of Tweezer‐type Bis(zinc porphyrin) with 5,15‐Di(4‐pyridyl)porphyrin Derivatives

Dynamic assembly inclusion complexes of tweezer-type bis(zinc porphyrin) (1) with di(4-pyridyl)porphyrin derivatives have been designed and constructed. The complexes are induced by Zn-N coordination, and the weak binding allows the large-size di(4-pyridyl)porphyrin guests in random rotation. Dynamic characteristics of these assemblies, such as ligand exchange and dynamic fluorescence quenching, have been investigated by 1H NMR, UV-Vis and fluorescence spectra. The stability of such assembly has pronounced dependence on the size-matching effect and thermal effect.     

Recognition Properties and Self‐assembly of Planar [M(2‐pyridyl‐1,2,3‐triazole)2]2+ Metallo‐ligands

Molecular recognition continues to be an area of keen interest for supramolecular chemists. The investigated [M( L )₂]²⁺ metallo‐ligands (M=Pd^II, Pt^II, L =2‐(1‐(pyridine‐4‐methyl)‐1 H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐4‐yl)pyridine) form a planar cationic panel with vacant pyridyl binding sites. They interact with planar neutral aromatic guests through π–π and/or metallophilic interactions. In some cases, the metallo‐ligands also interacted in the solid state with Ag^I either through coordination to the pendant pyridyl arms, or through metal–metal interactions, forming coordination polymers. We have therefore developed a system that reliably recognises a planar electron‐rich guest in solution and in the solid state, and shows the potential to link the resultant host–guest adducts into extended solid‐state structures. The facile synthesis and ready functionalisation of 2‐pyridyl‐1,2,3‐triazole ligands through copper(I)‐catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) “click” chemistry should allow for ready tuning of the electronic properties of adducts formed from these systems.     

Pyridyl‐Functionalised 3H‐1,2,3,4‐Triazaphospholes: Synthesis,Coordination Chemistry and Photophysical Properties of Low‐Coordinate Phosphorus Compounds

Novel conjugated, pyridyl‐functionalised triazaphospholes with either tBu or SiMe₃ substituents at the 5‐position of the N₃PC heterocycle have been prepared by a [3+2] cycloaddition reaction and compared with structurally related, triazole‐based systems. Photoexcitation of the 2‐pyridyl‐substituted triazaphosphole gives rise to a significant fluorescence emission with a quantum yield of up to 12 %. In contrast, the all‐nitrogen triazole analogue shows no emission at all. DFT calculations indicate that the 2‐pyridyl substituted systems have a more rigid and planar structure than their 3‐ and 4‐pyridyl isomers. Time‐dependent (TD) DFT calculations show that only the 2‐pyridyl‐substituted triazaphosphole exhibits similar planar geometry, with matching conformational arrangements in the lowest energy excited state and the ground state; this helps to explain the enhanced emission intensity. The chelating P,N‐hybrid ligand forms a Re^I complex of the type [(N^N)Re(CO)₃Br] through the coordination of nitrogen atom N² to the metal centre rather than through the phosphorus donor. Both structural and spectroscopic data indicate substantial π‐accepting character of the triazaphosphole, which is again in contrast to that of the all‐nitrogen‐containing triazoles. The synthesis and photophysical properties of a new class of phosphorus‐containing extended π systems are described.     

Coordination Chemistry‐Assembled Multicomponent Systems Built from a Gable‐Like Bis‐Porphyrin: Synthesis and Photophysical Properties

Multiporphyrinic assemblies were quantitatively formed, in one step, from a gable‐like zinc(II) bis‐porphyrin ZnP₂ and free‐base porphyrins bearing pyridyl groups. The different fragments are held together by axial 4′‐N(pyridyl)–Zn interactions. Formation of a macrocycle ZnP₂?(4′‐cisDPyP) and a bis‐macrocycle (ZnP₂)₂?(TPyP) is discussed. The macrocycle and the bis‐macrocycle were crystallized and studied by X‐ray diffraction, which confirmed the excellent complementarity between the various components. Spectrophotometric and spectrofluorimetric titrations and studies reveal high association constants for both multiporphyrinic assemblies due to the almost perfect geometrical match between the interacting units. As expected, energy transfer from the zinc porphyrin component to the free‐base porphyrin quenches the fluorescence of the zinc porphyrin components in both compounds. But while in ZnP₂?(4′‐cis DPyP) sensitization of the emission of the free‐base porphyrin was observed, in (ZnP₂)₂?(TPyP) excitation of the peripheral Zn porphyrin units does not lead to quantitative sensitization of the luminescence of the free‐base porphyrin acceptor. An unusual HOMO–HOMO electron transfer reaction from ZnP₂ to the excited TPyP unit was detected and studied.     

Coordination and hydrogen‐bonding assemblies in hybrid reaction products between 5,10,15,20‐tetra‐4‐pyridylporphyrin and dysprosium trinitrate hexahydrate

Reactions of the title free‐base porphyrin compound (TPyP) with dysprosium trinitrate hexahydrate in different crystallization environments yielded two solid products, viz. [μ‐5,15‐bis(pyridin‐1‐ium‐4‐yl)‐10,20‐di‐4‐pyridylporphyrin]bis[aquatetranitratodysprosium(III)] benzene solvate, [Dy₂(NO₃)₈(C₄₀H₂₈N₈)(H₂O)₂]·C₆H₆, (I), and 5,10,15,20‐tetrakis(pyridin‐1‐ium‐4‐yl)porphyrin pentaaquadinitratodysprosate(III) pentanitrate diethanol solvate dihydrate, (C₄₀H₃₀N₈)[Dy(NO₃)₂(H₂O)₅](NO₃)₅·2C₂H₆O·2H₂O, (II). Compound (I) represents a 2:1 metal–porphyrin coordinated complex, which lies across a centre of inversion. Two trans‐related pyridyl groups are involved in Dy coordination. The two other pyridyl substituents are protonated and involved in intermolecular hydrogen bonding along with the metal‐coordinated water and nitrate ligands. Compound (II) represents an extended hydrogen‐bonded assembly between the tetrakis(pyridin‐1‐ium‐4‐yl)porphyrin tetracation, the [Dy(NO₃)₂(H₂O)₅]⁺ cation and the free nitrate ions, as well as the ethanol and water solvent molecules. This report provides the first structural characterization of the exocyclic dysprosium complex with tetrapyridylporphyrin. It also demonstrates that charge balance can be readily achieved by protonation of the peripheral pyridyl functions, which then enhances their capacity in hydrogen bonding as H‐atom donors rather than H‐atom acceptors.     

Phenylene‐bridged Porphyrin meso‐Oxy Radical Dimers

Stable meta‐ and para‐phenylene bridged porphyrin meso‐oxy radical dimers and their Ni^II and Zn^II complexes were synthesized. All the dimers exhibited optical and electrochemical properties similar to the corresponding porphyrin meso‐oxy radical monomers, indicating small electronic interaction between the two spins. Intramolecular spin‐spin interaction through the π‐spacer was determined to be J/k_B=?15.9 K for m‐phenylene bridged Zn^II porphyrin dimer. The observed weak antiferromagnetic interaction has been attributed to less effective conjugation between the porphyrin radical and linking π‐spacer due to large dihedral angle. In the case of Zn^II complexes, both para‐ and meta‐phenylene bridged dimers formed 1D‐chain in solutions and in the solid states through Zn‐O coordination.     

Hydrogen‐bonded assemblies of 20‐(4‐pyridyl)porphyrin‐54,104,154‐tribenzoic acid with dimethyl sulfoxide and 4‐acetylpyridine in their dimethyl sulfoxide and tetrahydrofuran solvates

Crystals of the title compounds, 20‐(4‐pyridyl)porphyrin‐5⁴,10⁴,15⁴‐tribenzoic acid–dimethyl sulfoxide (2/5), C₄₆H₂₉N₅O₆·2.5C₂H₆OS, (I), and 20‐(4‐pyridyl)porphyrin‐5⁴,10⁴,15⁴‐tribenzoic acid–4‐acetylpyridine–tetrahydrofuran (1/2/10), C₄₆H₂₉N₅O₆·2C₇H₇NO·10C₄H₈O, (II), consist of hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular chains of porphyrin units solvated by molecules of dimethyl sulfoxide [in (I)] and 4‐acetylpyridine [in (II)]. In (I), these chains consist of heterogeneous arrays with alternating porphyrin and dimethyl sulfoxide species, being sustained by COOH...O=S hydrogen bonds. They adopt a zigzag geometry and link on both sides to additional molecules of dimethyl sulfoxide. In (II), the chains consist of homogeneous linear supramolecular arrays of porphyrin units, which are directly connected to one another via COOH...N(pyridyl) hydrogen bonds. As in the previous case, these arrays are solvated on both sides by molecules of the 4‐acetylpyridine ligand via similar COOH(porphyrin)...N(ligand) hydrogen bonds. The two crystal structures contain wide interporphyrin voids, which accommodate disordered/diffused solvent molecules, viz. dimethyl sulfoxide in (I) and tetrahydrofuran in (II).     

Dimethyl 2,2′‐bipyridine‐6,6′‐dicarboxylate and bis(dimethyl 2,2′‐bipyridine‐6,6′‐dicarboxylato‐κ2N,N′)copper(I) tetrafluoroborate

The single‐crystal X‐ray structures of dimethyl 2,2′‐bipyridine‐6,6′‐dicarboxylate, C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₄, and the copper(I) coordination complex bis(dimethyl 2,2′‐bipyridine‐6,6′‐dicarboxylato‐κ²N,N′)copper(I) tetrafluoroborate, [Cu(C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₄)₂]BF₄, are reported. The uncoordinated ligand crystallizes across an inversion centre and adopts the anticipated anti pyridyl arrangement with coplanar pyridyl rings. In contrast, upon coordination of copper(I), the ligand adopts an arrangement of pyridyl donors facilitating chelating metal coordination and an increased inter‐pyridyl twisting within each ligand. The distortion of each ligand contrasts with comparable copper(I) complexes of unfunctionalized 2,2′‐bipyridine.     

Exploring Supramolecular Self‐Assembly of Tetraarylporphyrins by Halogen Bonding: Crystal Engineering with Diversely Functionalized Six‐Coordinate Tin(L)2–Porphyrin Tectons

This study targets the construction of porphyrin assemblies directed by halogen bonds, by utilizing a series of purposely synthesized Sn(axial ligand)₂–(5,10,15,20‐tetraarylporphyrin) [Sn(L)₂‐TArP] complexes as building units. The porphyrin moiety and the axial ligands in these compounds contain different combinations of complimentary molecular recognition functions. The former bears p‐iodophenyl, p‐bromophenyl, 4′‐pyridyl, or 3′‐pyridyl substituents at the meso positions of the porphyrin ring. The latter comprises either a carboxylate or hydroxy anchor for attachment to the porphyrin‐inserted tin ion and a pyridyl‐, benzotriazole‐, or halophenyl‐type aromatic residue as the potential binding site. The various complexes were structurally analyzed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, accompanied by computational modeling evaluations. Halogen‐bonding interactions between the lateral aryl substituents of one unit of the porphyrin complex and the axial ligands of neighboring moieties was successfully expressed in several of the resulting samples. Their occurrence is affected by structural (for example, specific geometry of the six‐coordinate complexes) and electronic effects (for example, charge densities and electrostatic potentials). The shortest intermolecular I???N halogen‐bonding distance of 2.991 Å was observed between iodophenyl (porphyrin) and benzotriazole (axial ligand) moieties. Manifestation of halogen bonds in these relatively bulky compounds without further activation of the halophenyl donor groups by electron‐withdrawing substituents is particularly remarkable.     

Reaktionen der Digalliumverbindung R2Ga–GaR2 [R = CH(SiMe3)2] mit Wasser und Carbonsäuren – Synthese von μ‐Hydroxo‐μ‐carboxylatodigallium‐Verbindungen unter Erhalt der Ga–Ga‐Bindungen

Treatment of the digallium compound R₂Ga–GaR₂ [ 1 , R = CH(SiMe₃)₂] with a broad variety of functionalized carboxylic acids in the presence of water yielded μ‐hydroxo‐μ‐carboxylatodigallium compounds ( 2 – 10 ) containing intact Ga–Ga bonds in high to moderate yields. The compounds form dimeric formula units in which the unsupported Ga–Ga bonds are bridged by two hydroxo and two carboxylato ligands. Each gallium atom is terminally coordinated by a bulky alkyl group. NMR spectroscopy revealed mixtures of two isomeric compounds in solution in all cases. The second component may show a different bridging mode with each Ga–Ga bond bridged by a bidentate carboxylato ligand to form Ga₂O₂C five‐membered heterocycles.     

A Ga‐MIL‐53‐type Framework based on 1,4‐Phenylenediacetate Showing Subtle Flexibility

The new MOF Ga‐MIL‐53‐PDA [Ga(OH)(O₂C‐C₈H₈‐CO₂)] · H₂O ( 1 ) was synthesized by a hydrothermal reaction of gallium nitrate, 1,4‐phenylenediacetic acid (H₂PDA) and sodium hydroxide at 100 °C for 24 h. The product is a structural analogue of the archetypical MIL‐53 framework. Its crystal structure was determined by Rietveld refinement of powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD) data. Furthermore 1,4‐phenylenedipropionic acid (H₂PDP) was employed for further synthesis, which resulted in the dense layered coordination polymers [Ga₂(OH)₄(O₂C‐C₁₀H₁₂‐CO₂)] ( 2 ) and [Ga(OH)(O₂C‐C₁₀H₁₂‐CO₂)] ( 3 ), for which accurate structural models could be established. All compounds were fully characterized and tested regarding potential breathing behavior. Most remarkably, Ga‐MIL‐53‐PDA showed a subtle flexibility upon de/‐rehydration also confirming its porosity, but no drastic structural changes were observed.     

Ga2Br2R2 und Ga3I2R3 [R = C(SiMe3)3] — zwei neue elementorganische Galliumsubhalogenide mit einer bzw. zwei Ga‐Ga‐Bindungen

Ga₂Br₂R₂ and Ga₃I₂R₃ [R = C(SiMe₃)₃] — Two New Organoelement Subhalides of Gallium Containing One or Two Ga‐Ga Single Bonds The oxidation of the tetrahedral tetragallium cluster Ga₄[C(SiMe₃)₃]₄ ( 1 ) with elemental bromine in the presence of AlBr₃ yielded the corresponding gallium subhalide Ga₂Br₂R₂ [ 4 , R = C(SiMe₃)₃], which remains monomer even in the solid state and in which the Ga^II atoms are connected by a short Ga‐Ga single bond [243.2(2) pm]. The analogous diiodide Ga₂I₂R₂ ( 3 ), which was obtained on a similar route by our group only recently, did not react with lithium tert‐butanolate by substitution as originally expected. Instead, partial disproportionation occurred with the formation of the trigallium diiodide Ga₃I₂R₃ ( 6 ), in which three Ga atoms are connected by two Ga‐Ga single bonds (255.1 pm on average). Both terminal Ga atoms have a coordination number of four owing to the bridging function of both iodine atoms, while the inner one which has an oxidation number of +1 remains coordinatively unsaturated. An average oxidation state of 1.66 resulted for all atoms of the chain. The Ga^III compound {[GaI(R)(OCMe₃)(OH)]Li}₂ ( 7 ) was isolated as the second product of the disproportionation. It is a dimer in the solid state via Li‐O bridges and shows a hindered rotation of its tert‐butyl group.     

Diamondoid framework solid with Sn(OCH3)2–tetrapyridylporphyrin linkers,CuI nodes and [CuICl2]− counter‐ions

We report on the synthesis of a new metal–organic framework (MOF) composed of Sn(OCH₃)₂–tetrakis(pyridin‐4‐yl)porphyrin linkers, Cu⁺ connecting nodes and [CuCl₂]⁻ counter‐ions, namely poly[[bis(methanolato‐κO)[μ₅‐5,10,15,20‐tetrakis(pyridin‐4‐yl)porphyrin‐κ⁸1κN⁵:1′κN¹⁰:1′′κN¹⁵:1′′′κN²⁰:2κ⁴N²¹,N²²,N²³,N²⁴]copper(I)tin(II)] dichloridocuprate(I)], [CuSn(C₄₀H₂₄N₈)(CH₃O)₂][CuCl₂]. Its crystal structure consists of a single‐framework coordination polymer of the organic ligand and the Cu^I ions. The latter are characterized by a tetrahedral coordination geometry [with CN (coordination number) = 4], linking to the pyridyl N‐atom sites of four different ligands and imparting to the positively charged polymeric assembly a diamondoid PtS‐type topology. Correspondingly, every porphyrin unit is coordinated to four different Cu^I connectors. The [CuCl₂]⁻ anions occupy the intra‐lattice voids, along with disordered molecules of the water crystallization solvent. The asymmetric unit of this structure consists of two halves of the porphyrin scaffold, located on centres of crystallographic inversion, and the Cu⁺ and [CuCl₂]⁻ ions. This report provides unique structural evidence for the formation of tetrapyridylporphyrin‐based three‐dimensional MOFs with a diamondoid architecture that have been observed earlier only on rare occasions.     

Effects of annealing on the surface structure of Ga‐isotope‐implanted single‐crystal ZnO

We studied the effects of Ga isotope implantation on surface structure using single‐crystal (0001) ZnO with an atomically flat surface. The surface morphology with steps and terraces was greatly changed by Ga implantation and post‐annealing: the step‐and‐terrace structure was suppressed by Ga implantation but a step‐and‐terrace structure appeared on the surface after post‐annealing at 900 °C for 4 min. The diffusion of Ga towards the surface through dislocation pipes at a density of up to 5 × 10⁸ cm^?2 was the dominant mechanism, and a significant amount of Ga moved from the implanted layer to the surface. The reaction between Ga and ZnO during post‐annealing appeared to improve sheet resistance and surface morphology. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

8‐Amidoquinoline, 8‐(Trialkylsilylamido)quinoline, 2‐Pyridylmethylamide,and (2‐Pyridylmethyl)(trialkylsilyl)amide Complexes of Gallium

Lithium 8‐amidoquinoline ( 1 ) and lithium 8‐(trialkylsilylamido)quinoline [SiMe₂tBu ( 2 ), SiiPr₃ ( 3 )] react with dimethylgallium chloride to the metathesis products dimethylgallium 8‐amidoquinoline ( 4 ) as well as dimethylgallium 8‐(trialkylsilylamido)quinoline [SiMe₂tBu ( 5 ), SiiPr₃ ( 6 )]. The gallium atoms are in distorted tetrahedral environments. During the synthesis of 5 , orange dimethylgallium 2‐butyl‐8‐(tert‐butyldimethylsilylamido)quinoline ( 7 ) was found as by‐product. The metathesis reactions of Me₂GaCl with LiN(R)CH₂Py (Py = 2‐pyridyl) yield the corresponding 2‐pyridylmethylamides Me₂Ga‐N(H)CH₂Py ( 8 ), Me₂Ga‐N(SiMe₂tBu)CH₂Py ( 9 ) and Me₂Ga‐N(SiiPr₃)CH₂Py ( 10 ). In these complexes the gallium atoms show a distorted tetrahedral coordination sphere. However, derivative 8 crystallizes dimeric with bridging amido units whereas in 9 and 10 the 2‐pyridylmethylamido moieties act as bidentate ligands leading to monomeric molecules.     

2,3‐Di(2‐pyridyl)‐5‐phenylpyrazine: A NN‐CNN‐Type Bridging Ligand for Dinuclear Transition‐Metal Complexes

A new bridging ligand, 2,3‐di(2‐pyridyl)‐5‐phenylpyrazine (dpppzH), has been synthesized. This ligand was designed so that it could bind two metals through a NN‐CNN‐type coordination mode. The reaction of dpppzH with cis‐[(bpy)₂RuCl₂] (bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine) affords monoruthenium complex [(bpy)₂Ru(dpppzH)]²⁺ ( 12+ ) in 64 % yield, in which dpppzH behaves as a NN bidentate ligand. The asymmetric biruthenium complex [(bpy)₂Ru(dpppz)Ru(Mebip)]³⁺ ( 23+ ) was prepared from complex 12+ and [(Mebip)RuCl₃] (Mebip=bis(N‐methylbenzimidazolyl)pyridine), in which one hydrogen atom on the phenyl ring of dpppzH is lost and the bridging ligand binds to the second ruthenium atom in a CNN tridentate fashion. In addition, the RuPt heterobimetallic complex [(bpy)₂Ru(dpppz)Pt(C?CPh)]²⁺ ( 42+ ) has been prepared from complex 12+ , in which the bridging ligand binds to the platinum atom through a CNN binding mode. The electronic properties of these complexes have been probed by using electrochemical and spectroscopic techniques and studied by theoretical calculations. Complex 12+ is emissive at room temperature, with an emission λ_max=695 nm. No emission was detected for complex 23+ at room temperature in MeCN, whereas complex 42+ displayed an emission at about 750 nm. The emission properties of these complexes are compared to those of previously reported Ru and RuPt bimetallic complexes with a related ligand, 2,3‐di(2‐pyridyl)‐5,6‐diphenylpyrazine.     

Die Reaktion des Digalliumsubiodids R(I)Ga‐Ga(I)R [R = C(SiMe3)3] mit Lithium‐diphenylphosphanid – radikalische Öffnung der Ga‐Ga‐Bindung

The Reaction of the Digallium Subiodide R(I)Ga‐Ga(I)R [R = C(SiMe₃)₃] with Lithium Diphenylphosphanide – Radical Cleavage of the Ga‐Ga Bond The easily available organoelement digallium(II) subiodide R(I)Ga‐Ga(I)R ( 1 ) [R = C(SiMe₃)₃] reacted with two equivalents of lithium diphenylphosphanide in toluene by the replacement of both iodine atoms by two phosphanido groups. The product, [R(H)Ga‐P(C₆H₅)₂]₂ ( 2 ), contains a four‐membered Ga₂P₂ heterocycle without direct Ga‐Ga bonding interactions and the gallium atoms exclusively in an oxidation state of +III. They are attached to hydrogen atoms, which may result from a reaction of a reactive intermediate with the solvent.     

Synthesis and Solution Studies of Silver(I)‐Assembled Porphyrin Coordination Cages

The synthesis and the characterization of two porphyrin coordination cages are reported. The design of the cage formation is based on the coordination of silver(I) ions to the pyridyl units of 3‐pyridyl appended porphyrins. ¹H/¹⁰⁹Ag NMR spectroscopy, and diffusion‐ordered spectroscopy (DOSY) experiments demonstrate that both the free base porphyrin 2H‐TPyP and the Zn‐porphyrin Zn‐TPyP form the closed cages, [ Ag₄(2H‐TPyP)₂ ]⁴⁺ and [ Ag₄(Zn‐TPyP)₂ ]⁴⁺, respectively, upon addition of two equivalents of Ag⁺. The complexation processes are characterized in details by means of absorption and emission spectroscopy in diluted CH₂Cl₂ solutions. The data are discussed in the frame of the point‐dipole exciton coupling theory; the two porphyrin monomers, in fact, experience a rigid face‐to‐face geometry in the cages and a weak inter‐porphyrin exciton coupling. An intermediate species is observed, for Zn‐TPyP , in a porphyrin/Ag⁺ stoichiometric ratio of about 1:0.5 and is tentatively ascribed to an oblique open form. The occurrence of a photoinduced electron‐transfer reaction within the cages is excluded on the basis of the experimental outcomes and thermodynamic evaluations. Photophysical experiments evidence different reactivities of singlet and triplet excited states in the assemblies. A lower fluorescence quantum yield and triplet formation is discussed in relation to the constrained geometry of the complexes. Unusually long triplet excited state lifetimes are measured for the assemblies.     

[5‐Benzyl‐3‐phenyl‐2‐(2‐pyridyl‐κN)thiazolidin‐4‐one‐κS]dichloropalladium(II)

The palladium(II) centre in the title compound, [PdCl₂(C₂₁H₁₈N₂OS)], is coordinated to the pyridyl N atom and to the thia­zolidinone S atom of the 5‐benzyl‐3‐phenyl‐2‐(2‐pyridyl)­thia­zolidin‐4‐one ligand, resulting in a five‐membered chelate ring. Two cis‐chloro ligands complete the square‐planar coordination environment of the metal. Although the geometry at the Pd centre is essentially planar, the N—Pd—S bite angle of 85.20 (8)° causes deviations in the cis angles from the ideal value of 90°. Opposite enantiomers form one‐dimensional chains in the cell via a short S?O intermolecular interaction.     

Di‐μ2‐sulfito‐κ8O,O′:O′,O′′‐bis[(2,4,6‐tri‐2‐pyrid­yl‐1,3,5‐triazine‐κ3N2,N1,N6)cadmium(II)] octa­hydrate

The title compound, [Cd₂(SO₃)₂(C₁₈H₁₂N₆)₂]·8H₂O, is a dimer built up around a symmetry center, where the sulfite anion displays a so far unreported coordination mode in metal‐organic complexes; the anion binds as a μ₂‐sulfite‐κ⁴O,O′:O′,O′′ ligand to two symmetry‐related seven‐coordinate Cd^II cations, binding through its three O atoms by way of two chelate bites with an O atom in common, which acts as a bridge. The cation coordination is completed by a 2,4,6‐tri‐2‐pyridyl‐1,3,5‐triazine ligand acting in its usual tridentate mode.