Controlled Incorporation of Nitrides into W‐Fe‐S Clusters

Incorporation of monatomic 2p ligands into the core of iron–sulfur clusters has been researched since the discovery of interstitial carbide in the FeMo cofactor of Mo‐dependent nitrogenase, but has proven to be a synthetic challenge. Herein, two distinct synthetic pathways are rationalized to install nitride ligands into targeted positions of W‐Fe‐S clusters, generating unprecedented nitride‐ligated iron–sulfur clusters, namely [(Tp*)₂W₂Fe₆(μ₄‐N)₂S₆L₄]^2? (Tp*=tris(3,5‐dimethyl‐1‐pyrazolyl)hydroborate(1?), L=Cl^? or Br^?). ⁵⁷Fe Mössbauer study discloses metal oxidation states of W^IV₂Fe^II₄Fe^III₂ with localized electron distribution, which is analogous to the mid‐valent iron centres of FeMo cofactor at resting state. Good agreement of Mössbauer data with the empirical linear relationship for Fe–S clusters indicates similar ligand behaviour of nitride and sulfide in such clusters, providing useful reference for reduced nitrogen in a nitrogenase‐like environment.     

The Nitrogenase FeMo‐Cofactor Precursor Formed by NifB Protein: A Diamagnetic Cluster Containing Eight Iron Atoms

The biological activation of N₂ occurs at the FeMo‐cofactor, a 7Fe–9S–Mo–C–homocitrate cluster. FeMo‐cofactor formation involves assembly of a Fe_6–8–S_X–C core precursor, NifB‐co, which occurs on the NifB protein. Characterization of NifB‐co in NifB is complicated by the dynamic nature of the assembly process and the presence of a permanent [4Fe–4S] cluster associated with the radical SAM chemistry for generating the central carbide. We have used the physiological carrier protein, NifX, which has been proposed to bind NifB‐co and deliver it to the NifEN protein, upon which FeMo‐cofactor assembly is ultimately completed. Preparation of NifX in a fully NifB‐co‐loaded form provided an opportunity for Mössbauer analysis of NifB‐co. The results indicate that NifB‐co is a diamagnetic (S=0) 8‐Fe cluster, containing two spectroscopically distinct Fe sites that appear in a 3:1 ratio. DFT analysis of the ⁵⁷Fe electric hyperfine interactions deduced from the Mössbauer analysis suggests that NifB‐co is either a 4Fe²⁺–4Fe³⁺ or 6Fe²⁺–2Fe³⁺ cluster having valence‐delocalized states.     

Nitrosylation of Nitric‐Oxide‐Sensing Regulatory Proteins Containing [4Fe‐4S] Clusters Gives Rise to Multiple Iron–Nitrosyl Complexes

The reaction of protein‐bound iron–sulfur (Fe‐S) clusters with nitric oxide (NO) plays key roles in NO‐mediated toxicity and signaling. Elucidation of the mechanism of the reaction of NO with DNA regulatory proteins that contain Fe‐S clusters has been hampered by a lack of information about the nature of the iron‐nitrosyl products formed. Herein, we report nuclear resonance vibrational spectroscopy (NRVS) and density functional theory (DFT) calculations that identify NO reaction products in WhiD and NsrR, regulatory proteins that use a [4Fe‐4S] cluster to sense NO. This work reveals that nitrosylation yields multiple products structurally related to Roussin's Red Ester (RRE, [Fe₂(NO)₄(Cys)₂]) and Roussin's Black Salt (RBS, [Fe₄(NO)₇S₃]. In the latter case, the absence of ³²S/³⁴S shifts in the Fe?S region of the NRVS spectra suggest that a new species, Roussin's Black Ester (RBE), may be formed, in which one or more of the sulfide ligands is replaced by Cys thiolates.     

Protonation and Proton‐Coupled Electron Transfer at S‐Ligated [4Fe‐4S] Clusters

Biological [Fe‐S] clusters are increasingly recognized to undergo proton‐coupled electron transfer (PCET), but the site of protonation, mechanism, and role for PCET remains largely unknown. Here we explore this reactivity with synthetic model clusters. Protonation of the arylthiolate‐ligated [4Fe‐4S] cluster [Fe₄S₄(SAr)₄]^2? ( 1 , SAr=S‐2,4‐6‐(iPr)₃C₆H₂) leads to thiol dissociation, reversibly forming [Fe₄S₄(SAr)₃L]^1? ( 2 ) and ArSH (L=solvent, and/or conjugate base). Solutions of 2 +ArSH react with the nitroxyl radical TEMPO to give [Fe₄S₄(SAr)₄]^1? ( 1_ox ) and TEMPOH. This reaction involves PCET coupled to thiolate association and may proceed via the unobserved protonated cluster [Fe₄S₄(SAr)₃(HSAr)]^1? ( 1‐H ). Similar reactions with this and related clusters proceed comparably. An understanding of the PCET thermochemistry of this cluster system has been developed, encompassing three different redox levels and two protonation states.     

Solvothermal Synthesis and Characterization of the New Iron Thioantimonates(III) [Fe(C6H18N4)]FeSbS4 and [Fe(C4H13N3)2]Fe2Sb4S10 Containing FeII and FeIII and Protein‐Analogous [2FeIII‐2S]2+ Clusters

The two new compounds [Fe(tren)]FeSbS₄ ( 1 ) (tren = tris(2‐aminoethyl)amine) and [Fe(dien)₂]Fe₂Sb₄S₁₀ ( 2 ) (dien = diethylendiamine) were prepared under solvothermal conditions and represent the first thioantimonates(III) with iron cations integrated into the anionic network. In both compounds Fe³⁺ is part of a [2Fe^III‐2S] cluster which is often found in ferredoxines. In addition, Fe²⁺ ions are present which are surrounded by the organic ligands. In ( 1 ) the Fe²⁺ ion is also part of the thioantimonate(III) network whereas in ( 2 ) the Fe²⁺ ion is isolated. In both compounds the primary SbS₃ units are interconnected into one‐dimensional chains. The mixed‐valent character of [Fe(tren)]FeSbS₄ was unambiguously determined with Mössbauer spectroscopy. Both compounds exhibit paramagnetic behaviour and for ( 1 ) a deviation from linearity is observed due to a strong zero‐field splitting. Both compounds decompose in one single step.     

A trinuclear Mo-Fe-Mo cluster compound [Et_4N] { [Me_2dtcMo-O(μ-S)_2]_2Fe} containing dialkyldithiocarbamate ligand

A trinuclear linear Mo-Fe-Mo dialkyldithiocarbamate complex [Et4N] { [ Me2dtcMoO (μ-S)2 ]2Fe} has been obtained and structurally characterized, which contains two Me2dtcMoO-(μ-S)2 units coordinated to a central tetrahedral Fe atom. A comparison of the structural parameters indicates the metal oxidation states of 2Mo(v) Fe(III). The 1H NMR shows chemical shifts of Me2dtc ligands at 5 10.14 and 8 9.40 with the intensity ratio of 1:1. The cyclic voltammogram displays a reversible couple at - 1.41 V/ - 1.36 V responsible for 1-/2-anions of the complex and an irreversible oxidation at 0.5 V, which seems to show the apparent lack of stability for its neutral species (Me2dtcMoOS2)2Fe.     

Low‐Spin Pseudotetrahedral Iron(I) Sites in Fe2(μ‐S) Complexes

Fe^I centers in iron–sulfide complexes have little precedent in synthetic chemistry despite a growing interest in the possible role of unusually low valent iron in metalloenzymes that feature iron–sulfur clusters. A series of three diiron [(L₃Fe)₂(μ‐S)] complexes that were isolated and characterized in the low‐valent oxidation states Fe^II? S? Fe^II, Fe^II? S? Fe^I, and Fe^I? S? Fe^I is described. This family of iron sulfides constitutes a unique redox series comprising three nearly isostructural but electronically distinct Fe₂(μ‐S) species. Combined structural, magnetic, and spectroscopic studies provided strong evidence that the pseudotetrahedral iron centers undergo a transition to low‐spin S=1/2 states upon reduction from Fe^II to Fe^I. The possibility of accessing low‐spin, pseudotetrahedral Fe^I sites compatible with S^2? as a ligand was previously unknown.     

Ate Complexes in Iron‐Catalyzed Cross‐Coupling Reactions

Iron‐catalyzed cross‐coupling reactions have an outstanding potential for sustainable organic synthesis, but remain poorly understood mechanistically. Here, we use electrospray‐ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry to identify the ionic species formed in these reactions and characterize their reactivity. Transmetalation of Fe(acac)₃ (acac=acetylacetonato) with PhMgCl in THF (tetrahydrofuran) produces anionic iron ate complexes, whose nuclearity (1 to 4 Fe centers) and oxidation states (ranging from ?I to +III) crucially depend on the presence of additives or ligands. Upon addition of iPrCl, formation of the heteroleptic Fe^III complex [Ph₃Fe(iPr)]^? is observed. Gas‐phase fragmentation of this complex results in reductive elimination and release of the cross‐coupling product with high selectivity.     

Structural and Mechanistic Insights into CO2 Activation by Nitrogenase Iron Protein

The Fe protein of nitrogenase catalyzes the ambient reduction of CO₂ when its cluster is present in the all-ferrous, [Fe₄S₄]⁰ oxidation state. Here, we report a combined structural and theoretical study that probes the unique reactivity of the all-ferrous Fe protein toward CO₂. Structural comparisons of the Azotobacter vinelandii Fe protein in the [Fe₄S₄]⁰ and [Fe₄S₄]⁺ states point to a possible asymmetric functionality of a highly conserved Arg pair in CO₂ binding and reduction. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations provide further support for the asymmetric coordination of O by the “proximal” Arg and binding of C to a unique Fe atom of the all-ferrous cluster, followed by donation of protons by the proximate guanidinium group of Arg that eventually results in the scission of a C−O bond. These results provide important mechanistic and structural insights into CO₂ activation by a surface-exposed, scaffold-held [Fe₄S₄] cluster.     

A Redox‐Induced Spin‐State Cascade in a Mixed‐Valent Fe3(μ3‐O) Triangle

One‐electron reduction of a pyrazolate‐bridged triangular Fe₃(μ₃‐O) core induces a cascade wherein all three metal centers switch from high‐spin Fe³⁺ to low‐spin Fe^2.66+. This hypothesis is supported by spectroscopic data (¹H‐NMR, UV‐vis‐NIR, infra‐red, ⁵⁷Fe‐Mössbauer, EPR), X‐ray crystallographic characterization of the cluster in both oxidation states and also density functional theory. The reduction induces substantial contraction in all bond lengths around the metal centers, along with diagnostic shifts in the spectroscopic parameters. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first example of a one‐electron redox event causing concerted change in multiple iron centers.     

Mössbauer Spectroscopic Investigation of FeII and FeIII 3,4,5‐Trihydroxybenzoates (Gallates) – Proposed Model Compounds for Iron‐Gall Inks

Iron gallates with iron in the oxidation states Fe²⁺ and Fe³⁺ were prepared and studied by Mössbauer spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction, and IR spectroscopy. Fe^III 3,4,5‐trihydroxybenzoate (gallate) Fe(C₇O₅H₄) · 2H₂O, whose structure was first determined by Wunderlich, was obtained by the reaction of gallic acid and metallic iron or by oxidation of the Fe^II gallate, which was obtained by the reaction of ferrous sulfate with 3,4,5‐trihydroxybezoic acid (gallic acid) under anoxic conditions. Trials to reproduce the hydrothermal preparation method of Feller and Cheetham show that the result depends crucially on the free gas volume in the reaction vessel. If there is no free volume one obtains the same Fe^III gallate as in the other preparation methods. With a large free volume another compound was found to form whose composition and structure could not be determined. It could be specified only by Mössbauer spectroscopy. Fe^III gallate, the Fe^II gallate, and the new phase show magnetic ordering at liquid helium temperature.     

Solvent‐Free Ball‐Milling Subcomponent Synthesis of Metallosupramolecular Complexes

Subcomponent self‐assembly from components A , B , C , D , and Fe²⁺ under solvent‐free conditions by self‐sorting leads to the construction of three structurally different metallosupramolecular iron(II) complexes. Under carefully selected ball‐milling conditions, tetranuclear [Fe₄( AD ₂)₆]^4? 22‐component cage 1 , dinuclear [Fe₂( BD ₂)₃]^2? 11‐component helicate 2 , and 5‐component mononuclear [Fe( CD ₃)]²⁺ complex 3 were prepared simultaneously in a one‐pot reaction from 38 components. Through subcomponent substitution reaction by adding subcomponent B , the [Fe₄( AD ₂)₆]^4? cage converts quantitatively to the [Fe₂( BD ₂)₃]^2? helicate, which, in turn, upon addition of subcomponent C , transforms to [Fe( CD ₃)]²⁺, following the hierarchical preference based on the thermodynamic stability of the complexes.     

Chloro­(3,6,13,16‐tetraethyl‐2,7,12,17‐tetra­methyl­porphycenato‐κ4N)iron(III) chloro­form solvate

The X‐ray crystallographic analysis of the title complex, chloro­[3,10,13,20‐tetraethyl‐4,9,14,19‐tetra­methyl­penta­cyclo[16.2.1.1^2,5.1^8,11.1^12,15]­tetracosa‐2,4,6,8(23),9,12,14,16,18(21),19‐decaene]­iron(III) chloro­form solvate, [Fe(C₃₃H₃₇N₄)Cl]·CHCl₃, reveals a twisted macrocyclic framework with a slightly distorted rectangular pyramidal core, where the deviation of the central Fe^III atom from the least‐squares plane of the C₂₀N₄ core is 0.594 (1) Å. Some important bond distances are as follows: Fe—N 2.019 (3), 2.026 (3), 2.028 (3) and 2.034 (3) Å; Fe—Cl 2.232 (1) Å.     

New insight into the electronic structure of iron(IV)‐oxo porphyrin compound I. A quantum chemical topological analysis

The electronic structure of iron‐oxo porphyrin π‐cation radical complex Por^·+Fe^IV?O (S? H) has been studied for doublet and quartet electronic states by means of two methods of the quantum chemical topology analysis: electron localization function (ELF) η(r) and electron density ρ(r). The formation of this complex leads to essential perturbation of the topological structure of the carbon–carbon bonds in porphyrin moiety. The double C?C bonds in the pyrrole anion subunits, represented by pair of bonding disynaptic basins V_i=1,2(C,C) in isolated porphyrin, are replaced by single attractor V(C,C)_i=1–20 after complexation with the Fe cation. The iron–nitrogen bonds are covalent dative bonds, N→Fe, described by the disynaptic bonding basins V(Fe,N)_i=1–4, where electron density is almost formed by the lone pairs of the N atoms. The nature of the iron–oxygen bond predicted by the ELF topological analysis, shows a main contribution of the electrostatic interaction, Fe^δ+···O^δ?, as long as no attractors between the C(Fe) and C(O) core basins were found, although there are common surfaces between the iron and oxygen basines and coupling between iron and oxygen lone pairs, that could be interpreted as a charge‐shift bond. The Fe? S bond, characterized by the disynaptic bonding basin V(Fe,S), is partially a dative bond with the lone pair donated from sulfur atom. The change of electronic state from the doublet (M = 2) to quartet (M = 4) leads to reorganization of spin polarization, which is observed only for the porphyrin skeleton (?0.43e to 0.50e) and S? H bond (?0.55e to 0.52e). © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Isoprenoid Biosynthesis in Pathogenic Bacteria: Nuclear Resonance Vibrational Spectroscopy Provides Insight into the Unusual [4Fe‐4S] Cluster of the E. coli LytB/IspH Protein

The LytB/IspH protein catalyzes the last step of the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway which is used for the biosynthesis of essential terpenoids in most pathogenic bacteria. Therefore, the MEP pathway is a target for the development of new antimicrobial agents as it is essential for microorganisms, yet absent in humans. Substrate‐free LytB has a special [4Fe‐4S]²⁺ cluster with a yet unsolved structure. This motivated us to use synchrotron‐based nuclear resonance vibrational spectroscopy (NRVS) in combination with quantum chemical‐molecular mechanical (QM/MM) calculations to gain more insight into the structure of substrate‐free LytB. The apical iron atom of the [4Fe‐4S]²⁺ is clearly linked to three water molecules. We additionally present NRVS data of LytB bound to its natural substrate, (E)‐4‐hydroxy‐3‐methylbut‐2‐en‐1‐yl diphosphate (HMBPP) and to the inhibitors (E)‐4‐amino‐3‐methylbut‐2‐en‐1‐yl diphosphate and (E)‐4‐mercapto‐3‐methylbut‐2‐en‐1‐yl diphosphate.     

Fe6.67(PO4)5.35(HPO4)0.65 and Fe6.23(PO4)4.45(HPO4)1.55: two new mixed‐valence iron phosphates

Two new mixed‐valence iron phosphates, namely heptairon pentaphosphate hydrogen phosphate, Fe_6.67(PO₄)_5.35(HPO₄)_0.65, and heptairon tetraphosphate bis(hydrogen phosphate), Fe_6.23(PO₄)_4.45(HPO₄)_1.55, have been synthesized hydrothermally at 973 K and 0.1 GPa. The structures are similar to that of Fe^II₃Fe^III₄(PO₄)₆ and are characterized by infinite chains of Fe polyhedra parallel to the [101] direction. These chains are formed by the Fe1O₆ and Fe2O₆ octahedra, alternating with the Fe4O₅ distorted pentagonal bipyramids, according to the stacking sequence ...Fe1–Fe1–Fe4–Fe2–Fe2.... The Fe3O₆ octahedra and PO₄ tetrahedra connect the chains together. Fe^II is localized on the Fe3 and Fe4 sites, whereas Fe^III is found in the Fe1 and Fe2 sites, according to bond‐valence calculations. Refined site occupancies indicate the presence of vacancies on the Fe4 site, explained by the substitution mechanism Fe^II + 2(PO₄³⁻) = vacancies + 2(HPO₄²⁻).     

Control of the Transition between Ni‐C and Ni‐SIa States by the Redox State of the Proximal FeS Cluster in the Catalytic Cycle of [NiFe] Hydrogenase

[NiFe] hydrogenase catalyzes the reversible cleavage of H₂. The electrons produced by the H₂ cleavage pass through three Fe–S clusters in [NiFe] hydrogenase to its redox partner. It has been reported that the Ni‐SI_a, Ni‐C, and Ni‐R states of [NiFe] hydrogenase are involved in the catalytic cycle, although the mechanism and regulation of the transition between the Ni‐C and Ni‐SI_a states remain unrevealed. In this study, the FT‐IR spectra under light irradiation at 138–198 K show that the Ni‐L state of [NiFe] hydrogenase is an intermediate between the transition of the Ni‐C and Ni‐SI_a states. The transition of the Ni‐C state to the Ni‐SI_a state occurred when the proximal [Fe₄S₄]_p^2+/+ cluster was oxidized, but not when it was reduced. These results show that the catalytic cycle of [NiFe] hydrogenase is controlled by the redox state of its [Fe₄S₄]_p^2+/+ cluster, which may function as a gate for the electron flow from the NiFe active site to the redox partner.     

Gold/Wüstite Core–shell Nanoparticles: Suppression of Iron Oxidation through the Electron‐Transfer Phenomenon

Plasmonic Au and magnetic Fe are coupled into uniform Au@Fe core–shell nanoparticles (NPs) to confirm that electron transfer occurred from the Au core to the Fe shell. Au NPs synthesized in aqueous medium are used as seeds and coated with an Fe shell. The resulting Au@Fe NPs are characterized by using various analytical techniques. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy and superconducting quantum interference device measurements reveal that the Fe shell of the Au@Fe NPs mainly consists of paramagnetic Wüstite with a thin surface oxide layer consisting of maghemite or magnetite. Electron transfer from the Au core to the Fe shell effectively suppresses iron oxidation from Fe²⁺ to Fe³⁺ near the interface between the Au and the Fe. The charge‐transfer‐induced electronic modification technique enables us to control the degree of iron oxidation and the resulting magnetic properties.     

An Unusually Delocalized Mixed‐Valence State of a Cyanidometal‐Bridged Compound Induced by Thermal Electron Transfer

The heterometallic complexes trans ‐[Cp(dppe)FeNCRu(o ‐bpy)CNFe(dppe)Cp][PF₆]_n ( 1 [PF₆]_n , n =2, 3, 4; o ‐bpy=1,2‐bis(2,2′‐bipyridyl‐6‐yl)ethane, dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane, Cp=1,3‐cyclopentadiene) in three distinct states have been synthesized and fully characterized. 1 ³⁺[PF₆]₃ and 1 ⁴⁺[PF₆]₄ are the one‐ and two‐electron oxidation products of 1 ²⁺[PF₆]₂, respectively. The investigated results suggest that 1 [PF₆]₃ is a Class II mixed valence compound. 1 [PF₆]₄ after a thermal treatment at 400 K shows an unusually delocalized mixed valence state of [Fe^III‐NC‐Ru^III‐CN‐Fe^II], which is induced by electron transfer from the central Ru^II to the terminal Fe^III in 1 [PF₆]₄, which was confirmed by IR spectroscopy, magnetic data, and EPR and Mössbauer spectroscopy.     

Hydroxylation of Aromatics with the Help of a Non‐Haem FeOOH: A Mechanistic Study under Single‐Turnover and Catalytic Conditions

Ferric–hydroperoxo complexes have been identified as intermediates in the catalytic cycle of biological oxidants, but their role as key oxidants is still a matter of debate. Among the numerous synthetic low‐spin Fe^III(OOH) complexes characterized to date, [(L₅²)Fe(OOH)]²⁺ is the only one that has been isolated in the solid state at low temperature, which has provided a unique opportunity for inspecting its oxidizing properties under single‐turnover conditions. In this report we show that [(L₅²)Fe(OOH)]²⁺ decays in the presence of aromatic substrates, such as anisole and benzene in acetonitrile, with first‐order kinetics. In addition, the phenol products are formed from the aromatic substrates with similar first‐order rate constants. Combining the kinetic data obtained at different temperatures and under different single‐turnover experimental conditions with experiments performed under catalytic conditions by using the substrate [1,3,5‐D₃]benzene, which showed normal kinetic isotope effects (KIE>1) and a notable hydride shift (NIH shift), has allowed us to clarify the role played by Fe^III(OOH) in aromatic oxidation. Several lines of experimental evidence in support of the previously postulated mechanism for the formation of two caged Fe^IV(O) and OH ^. species from the Fe^III(OOH) complex have been obtained for the first time. After homolytic O? O cleavage, a caged pair of oxidants [Fe^IVO+HO ^. ] is generated that act in unison to hydroxylate the aromatic ring: HO ^. attacks the ring to give a hydroxycyclohexadienyl radical, which is further oxidized by Fe^IVO to give a cationic intermediate that gives rise to a NIH shift upon ketonization before the final re‐aromatization step. Spin‐trapping experiments in the presence of 5,5‐dimethyl‐1‐pyrroline N‐oxide and GC‐MS analyses of the intermediate products further support the proposed mechanism.