Crystallization-induced composition inhomogeneities in PVDF/PMMA blends

Composition profiles develop around growing PVDF spherulites in a blend with PMMA. These profiles assume stationary courses after a certain crystallization time provided that the overall degree of crystallinity is not too high. The composition-dependent growth rate and the diffusion-controlled remove of the surplus PMMA from the spherulite surface are then in a stationary equilibrium. The internal structure of the spherulites will then be homogeneous, too. Upon isothermal crystallization of a PVDF/PMMA = 60/40 (wt %) blend at 160°C for at least 4 h, the spherulites internal degree of crystallinity x_c as related to the PVDF fraction obeys the inequality 55 wt % ≤ x_c ≤ 84 wt %. The overall PMMA content within the spherulites as averaged over its whole inside has been determined by IR microscopy. It amounts to about 15 wt %. In contrast, the PMMA content of the amorphous phase within the spherulites (averaged again over its whole inside) ranges between 28 and 52 wt %. This composition jumps at the spherulite surface to 52 wt %. From the slope of the composition profiles outside the spherulites that have a width of more than 50 μm, the effective chain diffusion coefficient in blends as averaged over both components can be calculated to amount to (250 ± 100) μm²h⁻¹. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 36: 2923–2930, 1998     

Crystallization and morphology of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) blends. III. Crystallization and phase diagram by differential scanning calorimetry

The crystallization of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF)/poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) blends was studied with differential scanning calorimetry, from which the phase diagram was derived. Strong miscibility was underlined by the large negative Flory–Huggins interaction parameter (?0.25). The crystallization of the blend components differed remarkably. Whereas PVDF always crystallized in the surroundings of a homogeneous melt, PHB crystallized in a volume that was confined by the already existing PVDF spherulites, partly in their surroundings and partly inside. Under isothermal conditions, PVDF usually crystallized regularly in three dimensions with predominant quench‐induced athermal nucleation. The Avrami exponent for PVDF dendritic spherulitic growth was, however, distinctly smaller than that for compact growth, and this revealed the two‐dimensional lamellar growth inside. This deviation from ideal Avrami behavior was caused by the development of compositional inhomogeneities as PVDF crystallization proceeded, and this decelerated the kinetics. PHB crystallized three‐dimensionally with mixed thermal and athermal nucleation outside the PVDF spherulites. Inside the PVDF spherulites, PHB crystallization proceeded in a fibrillar fashion with thermal nucleation; the growth front followed the amorphous paths inside the dendritic PVDF spherulites. The crystallization was faster than that in the melt of uncrystallized PVDF. Solid PVDF acts possibly heterogeneously nucleating, accelerating PHB crystallization. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 43: 287–295, 2005     

Crystallization and morphology of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) blends. II. Morphology and crystallization kinetics by time resolved X‐ray scattering

The development of the morphology in poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PVDF/PHB) blends upon isothermal and anisothermal crystallization is investigated by time‐resolved small‐ and wide‐angle X‐ray scattering. The components are completely miscible in the melt but crystallize separately; they crystallize stepwise at different temperatures or sequentially with isothermal or anisothermal conditions, respectively. The PVDF crystallizes undisturbed whereas PHB crystallizes in a confined space that is determined by the existing supermolecular structure of the PVDF. The investigations reveal that composition inhomogeneities may initially develop in the remaining melt or in the amorphous phases of the PVDF upon crystallization of that component. The subsequent crystallization of the PHB depends on these heterogeneities and the supermolecular structure of PVDF (dendritically or globularly spherulitic). PHB may form separate spherulites that start to grow from the melt, or it may develop “interlocking spherulites” that start to grow from inside a PVDF spherulite. Occasionally, a large number of PVDF spherulites may be incorporated into PHB interlocking spherulites. The separate PHB spherulites may intrude into the PVDF spherulites upon further growth, which results in “interpenetrating spherulites.” Interlocking and interpenetrating are realized by the growth of separate lamellar stacks (“fibrils”) of the blend components. There is no interlamellar growth. The growth direction of the PHB fibrils follows that of the existing PVDF fibrils. Depending on the distribution of the PHB molecules on the interlamellar and interfibrillar PVDF regions, the lamellar arrangement of the PVDF may contract or expand upon PHB crystallization and the adjacent fibrils of the two components are linked or clearly separated. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 974–985, 2004     

Effect of poly(butylene succinate) crystals on spherulitic growth of poly(ethylene oxide) in binary blends of the two substances

The effects of the lamellar growth direction, extinction rings, and spherulitic boundaries of poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU) on the spherulitic growth of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) were investigated in miscible blends of the two crystalline polymers. In the crystallization process from a homogeneous melt, PBSU first developed volume‐filling spherulites, and then PEO spherulites nucleated and grew inside the PBSU spherulites. The lamellar growth direction of PEO was identical with that of PBSU even when the PBSU content was about 5 wt %. PEO, which intrinsically does not exhibit banded spherulites, showed apparent extinction rings inside the banded spherulites of PBSU. The growth rate of a PEO spherulite, G_PEO, was influenced not only by the blend composition and the crystallization temperature of PEO, but also by the growth direction with respect to PBSU lamellae, the boundaries of PBSU spherulites, and the crystallization temperature of PBSU, T_PBSU. The value of G_PEO first increased with decreasing T_PBSU when a PEO spherulite grew inside a single PBSU spherulite. Then, G_PEO decreased when T_PBSU was further decreased and a PEO spherulite grew through many tiny PBSU spherulites. This behavior was discussed based on the aforementioned factors affecting G_PEO. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 47: 539–547, 2009     

Crystallization and morphology of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) blends. I. Spherulitic morphology and growth by polarized microscopy

The development of the poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) morphology in the presence of already existent poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) spherulites was studied by two‐stage solidification with two separate crystallization temperatures. PVDF formed irregular dendrites at lower temperatures and regular, banded spherulites at elevated temperatures. The transition temperature of the spherulitic morphology from dendrites to regular, banded spherulites increased with increasing PVDF content. A remarkable amount of PHB was included in the PVDF dendrites, whereas PHB was rejected into the remaining melt from the banded spherulites. When PVDF crystallized as banded spherulites, PHB could consequently crystallize only around them, if at all. In contrast, PHB crystallized with a common growth front, starting from a defined site in the interfibrillar regions of volume‐filling PVDF dendrites. It formed by itself dendritic spherulites that included a large number of PVDF spherulites. For blends with a PHB content of more than 80 wt %, for which the PVDF dendrites were not volume‐filling, PHB first formed regular spherulites. Their growth started from outside the PVDF dendrites but could later interpenetrate them, and this made their own morphology dendritic. These PHB spherulites melted stepwise because the lamellae inside the PVDF dendrites melted at a lower temperature than those from outside. This reflected the regularity of the two fractions of the lamellae because that of those inside the dendrites of PVDF was controlled by the intraspherulitic order of PVDF, whereas that from outside was only controlled by the temperature and the melt composition. The described morphologies developed without mutual nucleating efficiency of the components. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 41: 873–882, 2003     

Thermorheological complexity of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(vinylidene fluoride) miscible polymer blend: Terminal and segmental levels

Oscillatory shear rheometry data for a miscible blend of 20 wt % poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) in poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) shows breakdown of time–temperature superposition for this blend. A comparison between glass transition temperature which PMMA chains sense in the blend and effective glass transition temperature of this component indicates that, the Lodge–McLeish model can describe terminal dynamics of PMMA. In addition, terminal dynamics of PVDF chains in the blend is similar to that of its pure state in agreement with the mentioned model. At segmental level, dynamic mechanical thermal analysis of four wholly amorphous blends suggests that cooperativity of molecular motions decreases upon addition of 30 and 40 wt % PVDF to PMMA. This behavior has been confirmed via calculation of degree of fragility which presumably is attributed to strong tendency of PVDF chains to self‐association rather than inter‐association with PMMA chains according to the FTIR results. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 45: 2860–2870, 2007     

Miscible blends of polylactide and poly(methyl methacrylate): Morphology,structure, and thermal behavior

The miscibility of polylactic acid (PLA) and atactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends is investigated as a function of composition. The blends quenched from the melt show the presence of a single glass transition temperature dependent on the composition. The equilibrium melting temperature is determined using the Hoffman‐Weeks method and a depression is observed with increasing content of the PMMA component. The PLA spherulite growth rate and the overall isothermal crystallization rates decrease with increasing the amount of the amorphous component. The increase of the long period value as a function of the PMMA content in the blend is due to the segregation of PMMA component in the amorphous PLA interlamellar regions. The Lauritzen‐Hoffman secondary nucleation theory analysis shows that the segregation of the PMMA in the interlamellar region induces an increase in the surface entropy of folding. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2014 , 52, 1168–1177     

Rhythmic growth of ring‐banded spherulites in blends of liquid crystalline methoxy‐poly(aryl ether ketone) and poly(aryl ether ether ketone)

Rhythmic growth of ring‐banded spherulites in blends of liquid crystalline methoxy‐poly(aryl ether ketone) (M‐PAEK) and poly(aryl ether ether ketone) (PEEK) has been investigated by means of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), polarized light microscopy (PLM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques. The measurements reveal that the formation of the rhythmically grown ring‐banded spherulites in the M‐PAEK/PEEK blends is strongly dependent on the blend composition. In the M‐PAEK‐rich blends, upon cooling, an unusual ring‐banded spherulite is formed, which is ascribed to structural discontinuity caused by a rhythmic radial growth. For the 50:50 M‐PAEK/PEEK blend, ring‐banded spherulites and individual PEEK spherulites coexist in the system. In the blends with PEEK as the predominant component, M‐PAEK is rejected into the boundary of PEEK spherulites. The cooling rate and crystallization temperature have great effect on the phase behavior, especially the ring‐banded spherulite formation in the blends. In addition, the effects of M‐PAEK phase transition rate and phase separation rate on banded spherulite formation is discussed. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 45: 3011–3024, 2007     

Self‐decelerated crystallization in poly(butylene terephthalate)/poly(ε‐caprolactone) blends

Isothermal crystallization of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) blended with oligomeric poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) is investigated by polarized optical microscopy and differential scanning calorimetry at various temperatures (T_c). The growth rate of PBT spherulites is found to depend on time (t), as the spherulite radius (r) linearly increases with t at the early stages of crystallization (r ∝ t), then, with the progress of phase transition, the spherulite radius becomes dependent on the square root of the time (r ∝ t^1/2) until termination of crystal growth. The nonlinear advance of the crystal growth front is caused by a varied composition of the melt phase in contact with the growing crystals, due to diffusion of mobile PCL chains away from the spherulite surface. The melt phase becomes spatially inhomogeneous, causing self‐deceleration of PBT crystallization until a limit composition that prevents further crystallization is reached in the melt. The maximum crystallinity achievable during isothermal crystallization decreases with T_c. The lowering of the temperature after termination of the isothermal crystallization allows to complete the crystal growth, but the final developed crystallinity still depends on T_c, being lower at higher T_cs. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 45: 3148–3155, 2007     

Miscibility and phase structure of binary blends of polylactide and poly(methyl methacrylate)

Blends of amorphous poly(DL‐lactide) (DL‐PLA) and crystalline poly(L‐lactide) (PLLA) with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were prepared by both solution/precipitation and solution‐casting film methods. The miscibility, crystallization behavior, and component interaction of these blends were examined by differential scanning calorimetry. Only one glass‐transition temperature (T_g) was found in the DL‐PLA/PMMA solution/precipitation blends, indicating miscibility in this system. Two isolated T_g's appeared in the DL‐PLA/PMMA solution‐casting film blends, suggesting two segregated phases in the blend system, but evidence showed that two components were partially miscible. In the PLLA/PMMA blend, the crystallization of PLLA was greatly restricted by amorphous PMMA. Once the thermal history of the blend was destroyed, PLLA and PMMA were miscible. The T_g composition relationship for both DL‐PLA/PMMA and PLLA/PMMA miscible systems obeyed the Gordon–Taylor equation. Experiment results indicated that there is no more favorable trend of DL‐PLA to form miscible blends with PMMA than PLLA when PLLA is in the amorphous state. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 41: 23–30, 2003     

The competition between crystallization and demixing in polymer blends. IV. Detection of composition inhomogeneities around growing spherulites

In polymer blends of an amorphous and a semicrystalline component, the crystallization kinetics and the resulting morphology are heavily determined by the diffusion ability of the whole chains and by the dwelling site of the amorphous polymer. Depending on the relative rates of spherulite growth and chain diffusion, radial composition profiles around the growing spherulites and a gradual increase of the melt bulk composition can develop. The resulting change in composition, particularly at the crystallization front, causes a corresponding temporal variation of the spherulite growth rate. In the present article, two experimental techniques are introduced to prove the existence and to determine the course of these concentration profiles. They are based on the composition dependences of the spherulite growth rate and the number density of primary nuclei. Their efficiency is demonstrated by measurements on PVDF/PEA blends. The blend composition at the crystal growth front was found to change by absolute 25%, and the width of the profile can amount to up to 70 μm. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Morphology and interpenetrated growth of spherulites in miscible poly(ethylene succinate)/poly(ethylene oxide) blends

Morphology development and growth process of spherulites in miscible poly(ethylene succinate)/poly(ethylene oxide) blends are studied by means of polarizing optical microscopy and atom force microscopy in this paper. Thin films with different film thicknesses were used to follow the growth processes of spherulites and dendrites. It is shown that, when one component spherulite grows, the other component in the melt is always excluded from the spherulite. The excluded component may reenter into the spherulite through diffusion depending on amorphous volume fraction of spherulite and segmental mobility of molecules, which leads to the occurrence of interpenetrated growth. This mechanism was analyzed in detail in this paper.     

Phase separation studies on poly(vinylidene fluoride) and poly(methyl methacrylate) quenched blends

A combined study by SAXS and DSC on quenched blends of PVDF and PMMA is presented. Attention is focused on the first stage of the phase separation process during annealing that is shown to be mainly determined by the diffusion of the PVDF molecules from the amorphous blend phase towards the crystals growth front. The experimental monomer diffusion constants at T > T_g are compared with those expected theoretically using the approximation of the fast model process and the WLF equation for the relaxation frequency of the monomer. The nature and composition of the crystal interphase are discussed in terms of the SAXS invariant for the whole system and the calorimetric data derived from the T_g transitions observed.     

Carbon nanotubes induced poly(vinylidene fluoride) crystallization from a miscible poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(methyl methacrylate) blend

Different contents of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were introduced into a miscible poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blend. The interfacial affinity between CNTs and components of the blend was evaluated by calculating the interfacial tension. The dispersion and microstructure of CNTs in the nanocomposites were investigated through scanning electron microscope and rheological measurement. The effect of CNTs on the crystallization of PVDF was comparatively investigated through nonisothermal and isothermal crystallization processes. The results showed that CNTs exhibited stronger interfacial affinity to PMMA. Homogeneous dispersion of CNTs in the nanocomposites was achieved. Largely enhanced crystallization temperature and increased crystallinity of PVDF were obtained by adding CNTs during the nonisothermal crystallization process. The results obtained from the isothermal crystallization process proved that CNTs induced the concentration fluctuation in the sample, which resulted in the formation of spherulites with different types, i.e., the banded spherulites and compact spherulites. Furthermore, both the crystallization temperature and the content of CNTs exhibited great influence on the crystalline morphology of PVDF.     

Investigation on LCST behavior of a new amorphous/crystalline polymer blend: Poly(n‐methyl methacrylimide)/poly(vinylidene fluoride)

The liquid–liquid phase‐separation (LLPS) behavior of poly(n‐methyl methacrylimide)/poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PMMI/PVDF) blend was studied by using small‐angle laser light scattering (SALLS) and phase contrast microscopy (PCM). The cloud point (T_c) of PMMI/PVDF blend was obtained using SALLS at the heating rate of 1 °C min^?1 and it was found that PMMI/PVDF exhibited a low critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior similar to that of PMMA/PVDF. Moreover, T_c of PMMI/PVDF is higher than its melting temperature (T_m) and a large temperature gap between T_c and T_m exists. At the early phase‐separation stage, the apparent diffusion coefficient (D_app) and the product (2Mk) of the molecules mobility coefficient (M) and the energy gradient coefficient (k) arising from contributions of composition gradient to the energy for PMMI/PVDF (50/50 wt) blend were calculated on the basis of linearized Cahn‐Hilliard‐Cook theory. The kinetic results showed that LLPS of PMMI/PVDF blends followed the spinodal decomposition (SD) mechanism. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 46: 1923–1931, 2008     

Various crystalline morphology of poly(butylene succinate-co-butylene adipate) in its miscible blends with poly(vinylidene fluoride)

Poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) and poly(butylene succinate-co-butylene adipate) (PBSA) are crystalline/crystalline polymer blends with PVDF being the high-T(m) component and PBSA being the low-T(m) component, respectively. PVDF/PBSA blends are miscible as shown by the decrease of crystallization peak temperature and melting point temperature of each component with increasing the other component content and the homogeneous melt. The low-T(m) component PBSA presents various confined crystalline morphologies due to the presence of the high-T(m) component PVDF crystals by changing blend composition and crystallization conditions in the blends. There are mainly three different types of crystalline morphologies for PBSA in its miscible blends with PVDF. First, crystallization of PBSA commenced in the interspherulitic regions of the PVDF spherulites and continued to develop inside them in the case of PVDF-rich blends under two-step crystallization conditions. Second, PBSA spherulites appeared first in the left space after the complete crystallization of PVDF, contacted and penetrated the PVDF spherulites by forming interpenetrated spherulites in the case of PVDF-poor blends under two-step crystallization condition. Third, PBSA spherulites nucleated and continued to grow inside the PVDF spherulites that had already filled the whole space during the quenching process in the case of PBSA-rich blends under one-step crystallization condition. The conditions of forming the various crystalline morphologies were discussed.     

Miscibility,crystallization kinetics,and morphology of poly(β‐hydroxybutyrate) and poly(methyl acrylate) blends

The miscibility, spherulite growth kinetics, and morphology of binary blends of poly(β‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) and poly(methyl acrylate) (PMA) were studied with differential scanning calorimetry, optical microscopy, and small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS). As the PMA content increases in the blends, the glass‐transition temperature and cold‐crystallization temperature increase, but the melting point decreases. The interaction parameter between PHB and PMA, obtained from an analysis of the equilibrium‐melting‐point depression, is −0.074. The presence of an amorphous PMA component results in a reduction in the rate of spherulite growth of PHB. The radial growth rates of spherulites were analyzed with the Lauritzen–Hoffman model. The spherulites of PHB were volume‐filled, indicating the inclusion of PMA within the spherulites. The long period obtained from SAXS increases with increased PMA content, implying that the amorphous PMA is entrapped in the interlamellar region of PHB during the crystallization process of PHB. All the results presented show that PHB and PMA are miscible in the melt. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 1860–1867, 2000     

Effect of MMT,SiO2, CaCO3, and PTFE nanoparticles on the morphology and crystallization of poly(vinylidene fluoride)

The crystallization and melting behaviors of poly (vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) with small amount of nanoparticles (1 wt %), such as montmorillonite (MMT), SiO₂, CaCO₃, or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), directly prepared by melt‐mixing method were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), polarizing optical microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The nanoparticle structure and the interactions between PVDF molecule and nanoparticle surface predominated the crystallization behavior and morphology of the PVDF. Small amount addition of these four types of nanoparticles would not affect the original crystalline phase obtained in the neat PVDF sample (α phase), but accelerated the crystallization rate because of the nucleation effect. In these four blend systems, MMT or PTFE nanoparticles could be well applied for PVDF nanocomposite preparation because of stronger interactions between particle surface and PVDF molecules. The nucleation enhancement and the growth rate of the spherulites were decreased in the order SiO₂ > CaCO₃ > PTFE > MMT. The melting and recrystallization of PVDF was found in MMT addition sample, because of the special ways of ordering of the PVDF chains. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys, 2010     

Morphology and crystallization behavior of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(methyl methacrylate)/methyl salicylate,and benzophenone systems via thermally induced phase separation

Poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) blend microporous membranes were prepared by PVDF/poly(methyl methacrylate) blend (with mass ratio = 70/30) via thermally induced phase separation. Benzophenone (BP) and methyl salicylate (MS) were used as diluents. The phase diagram calculations were carried out in terms of a pseudobinary system, considering the PVDF blend to be one component. The crytallization behaviors of PVDF in the dilutions were detected by differential scanning calorimetry measurement. In these two systems, the melting and crystallization temperatures leveled off in the low polymer concentration (<40 wt %), but shifted to a higher temperature when the polymer concentration >40 wt %. The calculated crystallinity of PVDF for samples with low polymer concentrations was greater than those with high polymer concentrations, because of the limited mobility of polymer chains at a high polymer concentration. The membrane structure as determined by scanning electron microscopy depended on the phase separation mechanism. The quenched samples mainly illustrated the occurrence of crystallization on the same time scale as the liquid–liquid phase separated, resulting in the obvious spherulitic structure with small pores in the spherulites. As the polymer concentration increased, the size of the spherulites and pores within the spherulite was decreased. The evaluated porosity for BP diluted system was higher than that for MS diluted system, and decreased with the increased polymer concentration. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 47: 248–260, 2009     

Thermal and mechanical behavior of amorphous and semi-crystalline poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

Various PVDF/PMMA (poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(methyl methacrylate)) blends were selected for mechanical testing in compression. At low PVDF content (less than 50/50 w/w), the blends remain amorphous and PVDF and PMMA are fully miscible. In PVDF-richer blends, PVDF crystallizes in part, leading to a PMMA-enriched homogeneous amorphous phase. In this study, the degree of crystallinity was set at equilibrium by appropriate annealing of the samples before testing. Mechanical analysis was focused on the low deformation range, and especially on the yield region. Depending on the test temperature and blend composition, three types of response were identified, depending on whether plastic deformation is influenced: 1) by the PMMA secondary relaxation motions, 2) by the PVDF/PMMA glass transition motions, or 3) by the crystallite-constrained PVDF chains.