Synthesis and characterization of amphiphilic heterograft copolymers with PAA and PS side chains via “Grafting from” approach

The amphiphilic heterograft copolymers poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐2‐(2‐bromoisobutyryloxy)ethyl methacrylate)‐graft‐(poly(acrylic acid)/polystyrene) (P(MMA‐co‐BIEM)‐g‐(PAA/PS)) were synthesized successfully by the combination of single electron transfer‐living radical polymerization (SET‐LRP), single electron transfer‐nitroxide radical coupling (SET‐NRC), atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), and nitroxide‐mediated polymerization (NMP) via the “grafting from” approach. First, the linear polymer backbones poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐2‐(2‐bromoisobutyryloxy)ethyl methacrylate) (P(MMA‐co‐BIEM)) were prepared by ATRP of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and subsequent esterification of the hydroxyl groups of the HEMA units with 2‐bromoisobutyryl bromide. Then the graft copolymers poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐2‐(2‐bromoisobutyryloxy)ethyl methacrylate)‐graft‐poly(t‐butyl acrylate) (P(MMA‐co‐BIEM)‐g‐PtBA) were prepared by SET‐LRP of t‐butyl acrylate (tBA) at room temperature in the presence of 2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidin‐1‐yloxyl (TEMPO), where the capping efficiency of TEMPO was so high that nearly every TEMPO trapped one polymer radicals formed by SET. Finally, the formed alkoxyamines via SET‐NRC in the main chain were used to initiate NMP of styrene and following selectively cleavage of t‐butyl esters of the PtBA side chains afforded the amphiphilic heterograft copolymers poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐2‐(2‐bromoisobutyryloxy)ethyl methacrylate)‐graft‐(poly(t‐butyl acrylate)/polystyrene) (P(MMA‐co–BIEM)‐g‐(PtBA/PS)). The self‐assembly behaviors of the amphiphilic heterograft copolymers P(MMA‐co–BIEM)‐g‐(PAA/PS) in aqueous solution were investigated by AFM and DLS, and the results demonstrated that the morphologies of the formed micelles were dependent on the grafting density. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2011     

PMMA/PS纳米复合材料的制备及分散相稳定性研究

纳米复合材料具有许多优异的性能,但是由于纳米粒子常常很难以纳米尺寸均匀地分散在基体中,有时即使实现了纳米级分散,在后加工或应用过程中又会发生二次团聚,使得纳米材料的特性不能充分发挥．因此,要获得性能优异的纳米复合材料首先必须解决纳米材料在基体中的均匀、稳定分散问题．     

Liquid chromatography of polymer mixtures by a combination of exclusion and full adsorption mechanisms. Three- and four-component polymer blends

Summary Coupling of full adsorption-desorption and size-exclusion chromatography (FAD-SEC) has been applied to the separation and molecular characterization of three- and four-component polymer blends. The method is based on the full adsorption of alln orn−1 components of the polymer blend in a specially designed FAD minicolumn. By appropriate eluent switching the adsorbed polymers are desorbed stepwise from the FAD minicolumn into an on-line SEC column for molecular characterization. It is shown that the desorption isotherms of particular blend components give valuable information about the appropriate displacer composition. The exact position of the desorption isotherms depends, however, both on the amount of polymer adsorbed and in the presence of other, chemically different, polymers within FAD column. The nature and composition of the displacer must, therfore, be adjusted if the intervals between the desorption of particular blend components are to be large enough to prevent displacement overlap. Presented at: Balaton Symposium on High-Performance Separation Methods, Siófok, Hungary, September 3–5, 1997.     

Characterization of the interaction energies for polystyrene blends with various methacrylate polymers

The binary interaction energies between styrene and various methacrylates were determined from newly examined phase boundaries with lattice–fluid theory. Because the blends of polystyrene (PS) and poly(cyclohexylmethacrylate) (PCHMA) were only miscible at high molecular weights when the blends were prepared by solution casting from tetrahydrofuran, we examined the miscibility of other blends by changing the molecular weights of PS or methacrylate polymers. On the basis of the phase‐separation temperature caused by the lower critical solution temperature, the miscibility of PS with the various methacrylates appeared to be in the order PCHMA > poly(n‐propyl‐methacrylate) (PnPMA) > poly(ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA) > poly(n‐butyl‐methacrylate) (PnBMA) > poly(iso‐butyl‐methacrylate) > poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) > poly(tert‐butyl methacrylate), and the branching of butylmethacrylate appeared to decrease the miscibility with PS. The interaction energies between PS with various methacrylates obtained from phase boundaries with lattice–fluid theory reached minimum value corresponding to the styrene/n‐propylmethacrylate interaction. They were in the order PnPMA < PEMA < PCHMA < PnBMA < PMMA. The difference in the order of miscibility and interaction energies might be attributed to the terms related to the compressibility. The phase‐separation temperatures calculated with the interaction energies obtained here indicated that the PS/PEMA and PS/PnPMA blends at high molecular weights were miscible, whereas the PS/PnBMA blends were immiscible at high molecular weights. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 2666–2677, 2000     

Crystallization,morphology, structure and miscibility of poly(ethylene oxide) based blends

Results of an investigation on the morphology, structure, isothermal crystallization, thermal behaviour and miscibility of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) based binary blends are reported. In particular poly(vinyl acetate)(PVAc), poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) at different tacticity and poly(ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA) were added to PEO. It was found that with the only exception of isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (IPMMA), the addition of the above cited components causes a depression in both the spherulite growth rate and the overall kinetic rate constant. The experimental G and Kn were analyzed by means of the latest kinetic theory in order to determine the influence of composition on the process of surface secondary nucleation. The optical microscopy of thin films of the sample revealed that the blends crystallized with volume filling crystals at least up to 50/50 blend composition. The small angle X-ray scattering curves were analyzed using a recently developed methodology. The structural properties of the blends were attributed to the presence of the non crystallizable material in the interlamellar or interfibrillar regions of PEO. From the glass transition temperature it has been deduced that an homogeneous amorphous phase is present for all the blends except for the PEO/IPMMA amorphous system. For the system PEO/atactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (APMMA) the miscibility was also predicted by theoretical approaches.     

Molecular interaction in some polymeric additive solutions containing styrene-hydrogenated butadiene copolymer

The miscibility of styrene-hydrogenated butadiene copolymer (SHB) with different constituents of polymer additives for lubricating mineral oils was studied in dilute solution regime, using xylene as model solvent, at 30 °C, in a wide range of polymer blend compositions. The systems studied were SHB/poly(ethylene-co-propylene) (EPC), SHB/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), SHB/poly(dodecyl methacrylate) (PDDMA) and SHB/polystyrene (PS). The viscometric interaction parameters were calculated according to the Krigbaum–Wall and Catsiff–Hewett models of ideal viscometric behavior. Strong repulsive interactions were found in SHB/PMMA and SHB/PDDMA systems pointing to immiscibility. SHB/EPC and SHB/PS deviated much less from ideality. The results were compared to the theoretical estimation of interaction in polymer blends in the absence of solvent, using the Coleman–Graf–Painter approach. No correlation was observed between the interaction in the bulk and in solution.     

Polystyrene‐graft‐poly(ethylene oxide) copolymers prepared by macromonomer technique in dispersion. I. Liquid chromatographic separation of product mixtures

Products of the radical dispersion copolymerization of methacryloyl‐terminated poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) macromonomer and styrene were separated and characterized by size exclusion chromatography (SEC), full adsorption‐desorption (FAD)/SEC coupling and eluent gradient liquid adsorption chromatography (LAC). In dimethylformamide, which is a good solvent for PEO side chains but a poor solvent for polystyrene (PS), amphiphilic PS‐graft‐PEO copolymers formed aggregates, which were very stable at room temperature even upon substantial dilution. The aggregates disappeared at high temperature or in tetrahydrofuran (THF), which is a good solvent for both homopolymers and for PS‐graft‐PEO. FAD/SEC procedure allowed separation of homo‐PS from graft‐copolymer and determination of both its amount and molar mass. Effective molar mass of graft‐copolymer was estimated directly from the SEC calibration curve determined with PS standards. Presence of larger amount of the homo‐PS in the final graft‐copolymer products was also confirmed with LAC measurements. The results indicate that there are at least two or maybe three polymerization loci; namely the continuous phase, the particle surface layer and the particle core. The graft copolymers are produced mainly in the continuous phase while PS or copolymer rich in styrene units is formed mostly in the core of monomer‐swollen particles. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 38: 2284–2291, 2000     

Structure and interactions in homopolymers and blends as studied by the methods of vibrational and nmr spectroscopy

The combination of IR, Raman and NMR spectroscopy was used in the study of the blends of semicrystalline and amorphous polymers with considerably different strength of intermolecular interactions: poly(ϵ-caprolactam)/polystyrene (PCL/PS), poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO/PMMA) and poly(N-methyllaurolactam)/poly(4-vinylphenol) (PNMLL/PVPh). In the vibrational and NMR spectra of the blends composed of non-interacting polymers (PCL/PS) and weakly interacting polymers (PEO/PMMA), no band changes were observed which would indicate changes of the conformational structures. ¹H NMR relaxation of the PCL and PS components in the blends is the same as in the respective homopolymers similarly treated. In the blends of weakly interacting polymers (PEO/PMMA), the crystallinity of PEO is influenced by the presence of PMMA and is negligible in the blends with less than 30 wt.-% of PEO. The rotating-frame spin-lattice relaxation time for protons T^H_1p of PMMA indicates close contact of the PMMA and PEO chains. In the blends PNMLL/PVPh with strong hydrogen-bonding interactions, both components are intimately mixed on a scale of 3–4 nm and significant shifts of some bands both in vibrational and in NMR spectra reveal changes of structure.     

Polymer chain diffusion in polymer blends: A theoretical interpretation based on a memory function formalism

The diffusion of polymer chains in miscible polymer blends with large dynamic asymmetry—those where the two blend components display very different segmental mobility—is not well understood yet. In the extreme case of the blend system of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(methyl methacrylate)(PMMA), the diffusion coefficient of PEO chains in the blend can change by more than five orders of magnitude while the segmental time scale hardly changes with respect to that of pure PEO. This behavior is not observed in blend systems with small or moderate dynamic asymmetry as, for instance, polyisoprene/poly(vinyl ethylene) blends. These two very different behaviors can be understood and quantitatively explained in a unified way in the framework of a memory function formalism, which takes into account the effect of the collective dynamics on the chain dynamics of a tagged chain. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2019 , 57, 1239–1245     

Synthesis of amphiphilic ABC triblock copolymers by single electron transfer nitroxide radical coupling reaction in tetrahydrofuran

A series of ABC triblock copolymers, that is, polyisoprene‐block‐polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene oxide) (PI‐PS‐PEO), PI‐block‐poly(tert‐butyl acrylate)‐block‐PEO (PI‐PtBA‐PEO), and PI‐block‐poly(acrylic acide)‐block‐PEO (PI‐PAA‐PEO) were obtained by combination of anionic technique, atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), and single electron transfer nitroxide coupling (SETNRC) reaction. Anionic polymerization of isoprene followed by end capping with ethylene oxide yielded hydroxyl‐terminated PI. After esterification, PI with Br end group was used as a macroinitiator to initiate the polymerization of styrene and tBA by ATRP that was then trapped by 2,2,6,6‐tetramethylpiperidine‐1‐oxyl (TEMPO) group in PEO by SETNRC reaction rapidly with high efficiency in tetrahydrofuran at room temperature. The effect of reaction time and polymer chain length on SETNRC reaction was discussed in detail. In the presence of Cu⁰/tris[2‐(dimethylamino)ethyl]amine, SETNRC between PI‐PS‐Br and PEO‐TEMPO was carried out with the efficiency of up to 91.6% in 2 h. With the increase in polymer chain length, the efficiency decreased fleetly. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2011     

Miscibility of Halogen-containing Polymethacrylates with Various Poly(alkyl acrylate)s

The miscibility behavior of a series of halogen-containing polymethacrylates with poly(methyl acrylate), poly(ethyl acrylate), poly(n-propyl acrylate) and poly(n-butyl acrylate) was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry and for lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior. Poly(chloromethyl methacrylate), poly(1-chloroethyl methacrylate), poly(2-chloroethyl methacrylate), poly(2,2-dichloroethyl methacrylate), poly(2,2,2-trichloroethyl methacrylate), poly(2-fluoroethyl methacrylate) and poly(1,3-difluoroisopropyl methacrylate) are miscible with some of the poly(alkyl acrylate)s. Most of the miscible blends show LCST behavior. However, poly(3-choloropropyl methacrylate), poly(3-fluoropropyl methacrylate), poly(4-fluorobutyl methacrylate), poly(1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoroisopropyl methacrylate), poly(2-bromoethyl methacrylate) and poly(2-iodoethyl methacrylate) are immiscible with any of the poly(alkyl acrylate)s studied. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Development and characterization of reactive extruded PVC/polyacrylate blends

This paper describes a method to obtain polymer blends by the absorption of a liquid solution of monomer, initiator, and a crosslinking agent in suspension type porous poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) particles, forming a dry blend. These PVC/monomer dry blends are reactively polymerized in a twin‐screw extruder to obtain the in situ polymerization in a melt state of various blends: PVC/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PVC/PMMA), PVC/poly(vinyl acetate) (PVC/PVAc), PVC/poly(butyl acrylate) (PVC/PBA) and PVC/poly(ethylhexyl acrylate) (PVC/PEHA). Physical PVC/PMMA blends were produced, and the properties of those blends are compared to reactive blends of similar compositions. Owing to the high polymerization temperature (180°C), the polymers formed in this reactive polymerization process have low molecular weight. These short polymer chains plasticize the PVC phase reducing the melt viscosity, glass transition and the static modulus. Reactive blends of PVC/PMMA and PVC/PVAc are more compatible than the reactive PVC/PBA and PVC/PEHA blends. Reactive PVC/PMMA and PVC/PVAc blends are transparent, form single phase morphology, have single glass transition temperature (T_g), and show mechanical properties that are not inferior than that of neat PVC. Reactive PVC/PBA and PVC/PEHA blends are incompatible and two discrete phases are observed in each blend. However, those blends exhibit single glass transition owing to low content of the dispersed phase particles, which is probably too low to be detected by dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) as a separate T_g value. The reactive PVC/PEHA show exceptional high elongation at break (～90%) owing to energy absorption optimized at this dispersed particle size (0.2–0.8 µm). Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Studies on high-performance size-exclusion chromatography of synthetic polymers. I. Volume of silica gel column packing pores reduced by retained macromolecules

Macromolecules, which stay adsorbed within the active size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) column packings may strongly reduce effective volume of the separation pores. This brings about a decrease of retention volumes of the non-retained polymer samples and results in the increased apparent molar mass values. The phenomenon has been demonstrated with a series of poly(methyl methacrylate)s (PMMA) and a polyethylenoxide (PEO) fully retained by adsorption within macroporous silica gel SEC column from toluene or tetrahydrofuran, respectively. The non-retained probes were polystyrenes (PS) in toluene and both PS and PMMA in THF eluents. The errors in the peak molar mass values determined for the non-retained polymer species using a column saturated with adsorbed macromolecules and considering calibration curves monitored for the original "bare" column packing assumed up to several hundreds of percent. Errors may appear also in the weight and number averages of molar masses calculated from calibration dependences obtained with columns saturated with adsorbed macromolecules. Moreover, the SEC peaks of species eluted from the polymer saturated columns were broadened and in some cases even split. These results demonstrate a necessity not only to periodically re-calibrate the SEC columns but also to remove macromolecules adsorbed within packing in the course of analyses.     

Thermal Degradation of Blends of PVC with Other Polymers

The thermal degradation behavior of blends of polyvinyl chloride) with polyacrylonitrile, poly(n-butyl methacrylate), poly-acrylamide, poly(N-butyl methacrylamide) and poly(methyl acrylate) is discussed, and the results for these blends and five other binary polyblends containing PVC previously studied are compared. The various types of interactions which can occur in these heterogeneous systems are considered, and the mechanisms of degradation are compared with those of each polymer when degraded alone. The most important interactive effects result when a small reactive species produced in the degradation of one of the two polymers in the blend diffuses into the domains of the other polymer in the two-phase system and reacts with that polymer.     

Ternary blends of poly(ethylene oxide) and acrylate-based copolymers: Crystallinity, miscibility, interactions and proton conductivity

In the present work, blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), poly(acrylonitrile-co-methyl acrylate) (PANMA) and poly(4-vinylphenol-co-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PVPh-HEM) were studied by DSC, FTIR and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). PEO/PANMA blends were found to be immiscible, while PEO/PVPh-HEM blends are miscible and PVPh-HEM/PANMA exhibits partial miscibility behaviour. The ternary PEO/PANMA/PVPh-HEM blends exhibited miscible compositions for PVPh-HEM and PEO-rich systems. The miscibility observed is a direct consequence of the hydrogen bond interactions among the polymer chains, in which the phenol groups in PVPh-HEM interact with both PEO and PANMA chains. The proton conductivity of a selected membrane based on the ternary blend containing 60% PEO and doped with H₃PO₄ aqueous solution reached 8 × 10⁻³ Ω⁻¹ cm⁻¹ at room temperature and 3 × 10⁻² Ω⁻¹ cm⁻¹ at 80 °C.     

Macromolecular reaction and interdiffusion in a compatible polymer blend, 2. The role of H‐bonding

A theory describing slow macromolecular reaction and interdiffusion in a compatible polymer blend is extended to consider H‐bonding. The known treatments of H‐bonding influence on the free energy of mixing and chains' mobilities are combined to calculate mutual diffusion coefficients in the framework of linear non‐equilibrium thermodynamics. Numerical calculations are performed for a blend of two random copolymers AC and BC to reveal the effect of H‐bonding (between A and B, B and B units) on the interdiffusion profiles. Then, the transformation of A units into B ones is included and the reaction‐diffusion equations are solved with the parameters corresponding to the blend of poly(tert‐butyl acrylate‐co‐styrene) with poly‐(acrylic acid‐co‐styrene) in which the thermal decomposition of tert‐butyl acrylate units takes place. The numerical calculations show that this system is suitable for the experimental verification of theoretical predictions concerning the interplay between macromolecular reaction and interdiffusion in polymer blends.     

Inverse gas chromatography for the study of one phase and two phase polymer mixtures

Experiment finds that, for a chlorinated polyethylene (chlorine content 62.1% by weight)/poly(ethyl methacrylate) blend, a negative value of χ′_{2 3} is obtained, which indicates compatibility. With increasing temperature, χ′_{2 3} increases towards zero as required by the lower critical solution temperature behaviour of polymer blends. For chlorinated polyethylene/poly(butyl acrylate) blends however the specific retention volume is a linear function of composition and a positive χ′_{2 3} results if calculated by the conventional theory. The magnitude of χ′_{2 3} is determined by the difference between the retention volumes of the pure polymers and decreases with temperature. This effect is assumed to be a result of phase separation during coating the blend onto the support. A theoretical treatment is developed to explain this behaviour.     

Miscible blends of amorphous polymers

Thirty-five polymethacrylate/chlorinated polymer blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. Poly(ethyl), poly(n-propyl), poly(n-butyl), and poly(n-amyl methacrylate)s were found to be miscible with poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), chlorinated PVC, and Saran, but immiscible with a chlorinated polyethylene containing 48% chlorine. Poly(methyl) (PMMA), poly(n-hexyl) (PHMA), and poly(n-lauryl methacrylate)s were found to be immiscible with the same chlorinated polymers, except the PMMA/PVC, PMMA/Saran, and PHMA/Saran blends, which were miscible. A high chlorine content of the chlorinated polymer and an optimum CH₂/COO ratio of the polymethacrylate are required to obtain miscibility. However, poly(methyl), poly(ethyl), poly(n-butyl), and poly(n-octadecyl acrylate)s were found to be immiscible with the same chlorinated polymers, except with Saran, indicating a much greater miscibility of the polymethacrylates with the chlorinated polymers as compared with the polyacrylates.     

Synthesis of ABCD 4‐miktoarm star polymers by combination of RAFT,ROP, and “Click Chemistry”

The ABCD 4‐miktoarm star polymers based on polystyrene (PS), poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL), poly(methyl acrylate) (PMA), and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) were synthesized and characterized successfully. Using the mechanism transformation strategy, PS with three different functional groups (i.e., hydroxyl, alkyne, and trithiocarbonate), PS‐HEPPA‐SC(S)SC₁₂H₂₅, was synthesized by the reaction of the trithiocarbonate‐terminated PS with 2‐hydroxyethyl‐3‐(4‐(prop‐2‐ynyloxy)phenyl) acrylate (HEPPA) in tetrahydrofuran (THF) solution. Subsequently, the ring‐opening polymerization (ROP) of ε‐caprolactone (CL) was carried out in the presence of stannous(II) 2‐ethylhexanoate and PS‐HEPPA‐SC(S)SC₁₂H₂₅, and then the PS‐HEPPA(PCL)‐SC(S)SC₁₂H₂₅ obtained was used in reversible addition‐fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization of methyl acrylate (MA) to produce the ABC 3‐miktoarm star polymer, S(PS)(PCL)(PMA) carrying an alkyne group. The ABCD 4‐miktoarm star polymer, S(PS)(PCL)(PMA)(PEO) was successfully prepared by click reaction of the alkyne group on the HEPPA unit with azide‐terminated PEO (PEO‐N₃). The target polymer and intermediates were characterized by NMR, FTIR, GPC, and DSC. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 6641–6653, 2008     

Blends of poly(2,6–dimethyl–1,4–phenylene oxide) with styrene copolymers

Binary blends of poly(2,6–dimethyl–1,4–phenylene oxide) (PPE) with various styrene copolymers were investigated. Poly(styrene–co–acrylonitrile) (SAN), poly[styrene–co–(methyl methacrylate)] (SMMA), poly[styrene–co–(acrylic acid)] (SAA) and poly[styrene–co–(maleic anhydride)] (SMA) are only miscible with PPE when the amount of comonomer is rather small. From calculated binary interaction densities it can be concluded that the strong repulsion between PPE and comonomer limits miscibility. In blends of PPE with SAN, as well as with ABS, the inter-facial tension between the blend components is significantly reduced upon addition of polystyrene–block–poly–(methyl methacrylate) diblock copolymers (PS–b–PMMA) and polystyrene–block–poly (ethylene–co–butylene)–block–poly–(methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymers (PS–b–PEB–b–PMMA). They show a profound influence on morphology, phase adhesion and mechanical blend properties.