Frequency and level dependent masking of the multiple auditory steady-state response in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)

The potential for interactions between steady-state evoked responses to simultaneous auditory stimuli was investigated in two bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Three experiments were conducted using either a probe stimulus (probe condition) or a probe in the presence of a masker (probe-plus-masker condition). In the first experiment, the probe and masker were sinusoidal amplitude-modulated (SAM) tones. Probe and masker frequencies and masker level were manipulated to provide variable masking conditions. Probe frequencies were 31.7, 63.5, 100.8, and 127.0 kHz. The second experiment was identical to the first except only the 63.5 kHz probe was used and maskers were pure tones. For the third experiment, thresholds were measured for the probe and probe-plus-masker conditions using two techniques, one based on the lowest detectable response and the other based on a regression analysis. Results demonstrated localized masking effects where lower frequency maskers suppressed higher frequency probes and higher amplitude maskers produced a greater masking effect. The pattern of pure tone masking was nearly identical to SAM tone masking. The two threshold estimates were similar in low masking conditions, but in high masking conditions the lowest detectable response tended to overestimate thresholds while the regression-based analysis tended to underestimate thresholds.     

Additivity of forward masking

Masked thresholds for a 1000-Hz sinusoidal signal were measured as a function of masker level in both forward and simultaneous masking for two types of maskers: a 1000-Hz sinusoid and a narrowband noise, 60-Hz wide, centered at 1000 Hz. In forward masking, the noise masker produced much steeper growth-of-masking functions than the sinusoid. Presenting a contralateral broadband noise "cue" with the forward masker dramatically reduced the slope of masking for the noise masker but did not influence results for the sinusoidal masker. The noise remained the more effective masker. The amount of masking produced by combinations of equally effective narrowband-noise and sinusoidal maskers was compared to that produced by each masker individually with and without the contralateral cue. No additional masking beyond that predicted by energy summation was measured for forward masking. Additional masking beyond energy-sum predictions was measured for analogous conditions in simultaneous masking. Comparisons of results obtained with and without the contralateral cue suggest that signal thresholds in the presence of narrowband-noise forward maskers can reflect nonperipheral auditory processes.     

Informational masking with small set sizes

Informational masking refers to interference in the detectability of a sound, or discrimination of some property of a sound, beyond that which can be attributed to interactions at the auditory periphery. In the current experiments the signal to be detected was a tone added to a 6-tone masker, and informational masking was introduced by randomly choosing the frequencies of the tones that comprise the masker. The primary question was whether small numbers of maskers could replace randomly drawn maskers without sacrificing the underlying detection schemes adopted by observers. Similar to the method used by Wright and Saberi [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 1765-1775 (1999)], detection thresholds were measured for different masker set sizes, where set size refers to the number of 6-tone maskers from which any one masker was drawn. Set sizes of 3, 6, 12, and 24 were tested as well as conditions in which the maskers were chosen at random. In addition, observers' memory for maskers was coarsely evaluated. Large differences in thresholds were found across observers and across different masker sets. Even for set sizes of 24, the memory test suggests some recognition of maskers for some observers. Post hoc analysis of the data included an evaluation of the relative contribution of different frequencies using a single linear model. As a base for comparison, a linear model fitted to each condition was also evaluated. Although the data were fitted better using many rather than one linear model, the reduction in quality of fit was modest. This result suggests substantial consistency in decision strategies regardless of masker set size.     

Modulation masking: effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase

Modulation thresholds were measured for a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) broadband noise in the presence of a SAM broadband background noise with a modulation depth (mm) of 0.00, 0.25, or 0.50, where the condition mm = 0.00 corresponds to standard (unmasked) modulation detection. The modulation frequency of the masker was 4, 16, or 64 Hz; the modulation frequency of the signal ranged from 2-512 Hz. The greatest amount of modulation masking (masked threshold minus unmasked threshold) typically occurred when the signal frequency was near the masker frequency. The modulation masking patterns (amount of modulation masking versus signal frequency) for the 4-Hz masker were low pass, whereas the patterns for the 16- and 64-Hz maskers were somewhat bandpass (although not strictly so). In general, the greater the modulation depth of the masker, the greater the amount of modulation masking (although this trend was reversed for the 4-Hz masker at high signal frequencies). These modulation-masking data suggest that there are channels in the auditory system which are tuned for the detection of modulation frequency, much like there are channels (critical bands or auditory filters) tuned for the detection of spectral frequency.     

Comparison of auditory filter shapes derived with three different maskers

Auditory filter shapes were derived for three different masker types, by measuring threshold for a 1-kHz sinusoidal signal masked by: (a) a noise with a spectral notch of variable width; (b) two tones with variable frequency separation; and (c) a noise with a sinusoidally rippled spectrum with variable ripple density. In each case the masker spectrum was symmetric about the signal frequency, the signal level was fixed, and the masker level was varied to determine threshold using an adaptive, two-alternative, forced-choice procedure. Both simultaneous and forward masking were used. The auditory filter shapes derived from the data were broader in simultaneous masking than in forward masking for all three masker types. In simultaneous masking the derived filters were similar for the three masker types, although there was a tendency for the filters derived from the rippled-noise data to be broader than those for the other maskers. In forward masking the auditory filters derived from the data for three masker types differed considerably in bandwidth and the slope of the filter skirts, and in that a portion of the rippled-noise filter was negative valued. The results are consistent with the idea that suppression has the effect of enhancing frequency selectivity, and that this effect is revealed in forward but not in simultaneous masking. However, the degree and nature of the enhancement differs for different masker types.     

Rate responses of auditory nerve fibers to tones in noise near masked threshold

The rate responses of auditory nerve fibers were measured for best frequency (BF) tone bursts in the presence of continuous background noise. Rate functions for BF tones were constructed over a 32-dB range of levels, centered on the behavioral masked thresholds of cats. The tone level at which noticeable rate changes are evoked by the tones corresponds closely to behavioral masked threshold at all noise levels used (-10- to 30-dB spectrum level). As the noise level increases, the response rate to the background noise approaches saturation, and the incremental rate response to tones decreases. At high noise levels, the rate responses to tones of low and medium spontaneous rate fibers are larger than those of high spontaneous rate fibers. Empirical statistics of auditory nerve fiber spike counts are reported; these differ from those expected of a Poisson process in that the variance is smaller than the mean. A new measure of discharge rate is described that allows rate changes to be expressed in units of a standard deviation. This measure allows tone-evoked responses to be interpreted in terms of their detectability in a signal detection task. Rate responses of low and medium spontaneous rate fibers are more detectable than those of high spontaneous rate fibers, especially at high noise levels. There appears to be sufficient information in the rate response of a small number of auditory nerve fibers to support behaviorally observed levels of detection performance.     

Vibrotacile masking of Pacinian and non-Pacinian channels

Vibrotactile masking functions were determined using sinusoidal and noise maskers. Results were nearly identical within the Pacinian (P) and non-Pacinian (NP) channels. At low maskers SLs there was a substantial amount of negative masking which proved not be an artifact of stimulus definition. The critical parameters for successful prediction of the data were a peripheral threshold and internal Gaussian noise. Threshold shifts in cross-channel stimulation can be attributed to the masker exceeding the detection threshold of the signal channel.     

Measurement of auditory temporal processing using modified masking period patterns

A common metric of auditory temporal processing is the difference in the threshold for a pure-tone signal masked by either unmodulated or amplitude-modulated noise. This technique may be viewed as a modification of the masking period pattern technique. Such measurements have been proposed as an efficient means of estimating auditory temporal resolution in a clinical setting, although in many cases threshold differences may reflect additional spectro-temporal processes. The primary purpose of the present experiment was to examine interactions among signal frequency and masker bandwidth and the effects of modulation frequency on modified masking period patterns. The results revealed unmodulated-modulated threshold differences that increased with increasing masker bandwidth and decreased with increasing modulation frequency. There was little effect of signal frequency for narrow-band noise maskers that were equal in absolute bandwidth across frequency. However, unmodulated-modulated threshold differences increased substantially with increasing signal frequency for bandwidths proportional to the signal frequency and for wideband maskers. Although the results are interpreted in terms of a combination of both within-channel and across-channel cues, the specific contributions of these cues in particular conditions are difficult to ascertain. Because modified masking period patterns depend strongly upon a number of specific stimulus parameters, and because it is difficult to determine with any precision the underlying perceptual processes, this technique is not recommended for use as a clinical measure of auditory temporal processing.     

A masking level difference due to harmonicity

The role of harmonicity in masking was studied by comparing the effect of harmonic and inharmonic maskers on the masked thresholds of noise probes using a three-alternative, forced-choice method. Harmonic maskers were created by selecting sets of partials from a harmonic series with an 88-Hz fundamental and 45 consecutive partials. Inharmonic maskers differed in that the partial frequencies were perturbed to nearby values that were not integer multiples of the fundamental frequency. Average simultaneous-masked thresholds were as much as 10 dB lower with the harmonic masker than with the inharmonic masker, and this difference was unaffected by masker level. It was reduced or eliminated when the harmonic partials were separated by more than 176 Hz, suggesting that the effect is related to the extent to which the harmonics are resolved by auditory filters. The threshold difference was not observed in a forward-masking experiment. Finally, an across-channel mechanism was implicated when the threshold difference was found between a harmonic masker flanked by harmonic bands and a harmonic masker flanked by inharmonic bands. A model developed to explain the observed difference recognizes that an auditory filter output envelope is modulated when the filter passes two or more sinusoids, and that the modulation rate depends on the differences among the input frequencies. For a harmonic masker, the frequency differences of adjacent partials are identical, and all auditory filters have the same dominant modulation rate. For an inharmonic masker, however, the frequency differences are not constant and the envelope modulation rate varies across filters. The model proposes that a lower variability facilitates detection of a probe-induced change in the variability, thus accounting for the masked threshold difference. The model was supported by significantly improved predictions of observed thresholds when the predictor variables included envelope modulation rate variance measured using simulated auditory filters.     

Forward- and simultaneous-masked thresholds in bandlimited maskers in subjects with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss

Forward- and simultaneous-masked thresholds were measured at 0.5 and 2.0 kHz in bandpass maskers as a function of masker bandwidth and in a broadband masker with the goal of estimating psychophysical suppression. Suppression was operationally defined in two ways: (1) as a change in forward-masked threshold as a function of masker bandwidth, and (2) as a change in effective masker level with increased masker bandwidth, taking into account the nonlinear growth of forward masking. Subjects were younger adults with normal hearing and older adults with cochlear hearing loss. Thresholds decreased as a function of masker bandwidth in forward masking, which was attributed to effects of suppression; thresholds remained constant or increased slightly with increasing masker bandwidth in simultaneous masking. For subjects with normal hearing, slightly larger estimates of suppression were obtained at 2.0 kHz rather than at 0.5 kHz. For hearing-impaired subjects, suppression was reduced in regions of hearing loss. The magnitude of suppression was strongly correlated with the absolute threshold at the signal frequency, but did not vary with thresholds at frequencies remote from the signal. The results suggest that measuring forward-masked thresholds in bandlimited and broadband maskers may be an efficient psychophysical method for estimating suppression.     

A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Forward-masking growth functions for on-frequency (6-kHz) and off-frequency (3-kHz) sinusoidal maskers were measured in quiet and in a high-pass noise just above the 6-kHz probe frequency. The data show that estimates of response-growth rates obtained from those functions in quiet, which have been used to infer cochlear compression, are strongly dependent on the spread of probe excitation toward higher frequency regions. Therefore, an alternative procedure for measuring response-growth rates was proposed, one that employs a fixed low-level probe and avoids level-dependent spread of probe excitation. Fixed-probe-level temporal masking curves (TMCs) were obtained from normal-hearing listeners at a test frequency of 1 kHz, where the short 1-kHz probe was fixed in level at about 10 dB SL. The level of the preceding forward masker was adjusted to obtain masked threshold as a function of the time delay between masker and probe. The TMCs were obtained for an on-frequency masker (1 kHz) and for other maskers with frequencies both below and above the probe frequency. From these measurements, input/output response-growth curves were derived for individual ears. Response-growth slopes varied from >1.0 at low masker levels to <0.2 at mid masker levels. In three subjects, response growth increased again at high masker levels (>80 dB SPL). For the fixed-level probe, the TMC slopes changed very little in the presence of a high-pass noise masking upward spread of probe excitation. A greater effect on the TMCs was observed when a high-frequency cueing tone was used with the masking tone. In both cases, however, the net effects on the estimated rate of response growth were minimal.     

Psychophysical evidence for auditory compression at low characteristic frequencies

Psychophysical estimates of compression often assume that the basilar-membrane response to frequencies well below characteristic frequency (CF) is linear. Two techniques for estimating compression are described here that do not depend on this assumption at low CFs. In experiment 1, growth of forward masking was measured for both on- and off-frequency pure-tone maskers for pure-tone signals at 250, 500, and 4000 Hz. The on- and off-frequency masking functions at 250 and 500 Hz were just as shallow as the on-frequency masking function at 4000 Hz. In experiment 2, the forward masker level required to mask a fixed low-level signal was measured as a function of the masker-signal interval. The slopes of these functions did not differ between signal frequencies of 250 and 4000 Hz for the on-frequency maskers. At 250 Hz, the slope for the 150-Hz masker was almost as steep as that for the on-frequency masker, whereas at 4000 Hz the slope for the 2400-Hz masker was much shallower than that for the on-frequency masker. The results suggest that there is substantial compression, of around 0.2-0.3 dB/dB, at low CFs in the human auditory system. Furthermore, the results suggest that at low CFs compression does not vary greatly with stimulation frequency relative to CF.     

Physiological responses to the pulsation threshold paradigm. II: Representations of high-pass noise in average rate measures of auditory-nerve fiber discharge

In a companion article [L. I. Hellstrom, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 230-242 (1989)], it was shown that psychophysical pulsation threshold masking patterns (PTPs) for high-pass noise maskers are not a simple transformation of the profile of activity evoked in the auditory nerve by the masker. In this article, PTPs are compared with neural representations in which interactions of masker and probe are considered. It is hypothesized that, at pulsation threshold, some criterion value of rate change occurs when the stimulus switches from masker to probe. The iso-rate probe level, defined for single auditory-nerve fibers, is the probe level at which this rate change is zero. Iso-rate probe levels are lowest when probe frequency equals best frequency (BF) of the fiber. Profiles of iso-rate probe level versus BF (equal to probe frequency) are qualitatively similar to PTPs but differ quantitatively, e.g., in the rate of growth of probe level with masker level (1.2 dB/dB for PTPs, 0.54 dB/dB for iso-rate profiles). Quantitative differences can be further reduced by requiring a positive rate criterion. These results suggest that PTPs are not solely a reflection of the internal representation of the masker, but reflect responses to the probe tone as well.     

Sinusoidal and noise maskers in simultaneous and forward masking

We compare psychophysical tuning curves obtained with sinusoidal and narrow-band (50-Hz wide) noise maskers in both simultaneous and forward masking. In one experiment, we examine the effects of different combinations of duration and intensity of the 1-kHz sinusoidal signal. In a second experiment, we compare tuning curves obtained with a sinusoidal signal to those obtained with a noise signal. In both experiments, a narrow-band noise is a more effective simultaneous masker than a sinusoid for masker frequencies near the signal frequency. We argue that this is probably due to the use of different detection cues in the presence of sinusoidal and noise maskers, and that the greater masking produced by the noise is not simply due to its greater variability. As observed in other studies, tuning curves are narrower in forward masking than in simultaneous masking.     

Effect of variability in level on forward masking and on increment detection

In the first of four experiments, all with the same four subjects, varying the level of a forward masker from interval to interval in a two-interval forced-choice (2IFC) adaptive procedure had little effect on threshold. In the second experiment, the signal level was fixed and performance was measured in units of d'. Varying the level of the forward masker again had little effect. Analyses of trial-by-trial data indicated that subjects did not vote for the interval with the higher-level masker, as would an energy detector. Performance was better on trials where the masker level in the interval with the signal was lower and was relatively independent of masker level in the nonsignal interval. In the third experiment, these results were replicated for a wider range of masker variability and with maskers lower in frequency than the signal. In the fourth experiment, the same range of variability from interval to interval was imposed on the level of the pedestal in an increment-detection task. Results were similar to those observed in forward masking. The results suggest that decision processes involved in both forward masking and increment detection are similar and that neither is based on energy detection. Template matching remains a viable alternative.     

Neural correlates of psychophysical release from masking

Responses of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers were measured for stimulus conditions analogous to those in which psychophysical release from masking has been observed in humans. The maskers were two equal power, narrow-band noise stimuli with different amplitude envelopes. The neurons in the sample fell into three groups that resolved the maskers' envelopes with varying degrees of accuracy. The boundaries of these groups were not sharply delineated by characteristic frequency (CF) but were dependent on the relationship between the masker level and the neurons' thresholds at the masker frequency. For the neurons that best preserved the maskers' envelope fluctuations, a neural release from masking was observed; rate-based neural masked thresholds were higher for the masker with the least fluctuating envelope. The results suggest that neural and psychophysical release from masking arises because the probe evokes larger rate changes, relative to the background response to the masker, during periods of low masker energy. Between two otherwise equivalent maskers, the one with the periods of lowest energy will produce the lower masked thresholds because rate changes are larger and more detectable.     

Simultaneous masking by gated and continuous sinusoidal maskers

Simultaneous masking of a 20-ms, 1-kHz signal was investigated using 50-ms gated and continuous sinusoidal maskers with frequencies below, at, and above 1 kHz. Gated maskers can produce considerably (5-20 dB) more masking than continuous maskers, and this difference does not appear to result from the spread of energy produced by gating either the masker or the signal. For masker frequencies below the signal frequency, this difference in masking is primarily due to the detection of the cubic difference tone in the continuous condition. For masker frequencies at and above the signal frequency, the difference appears to be an important property of masking. Implications of this frequency-dependent effect for measures of frequency selectivity are discussed.     

The temporal course of masking and the auditory filter shape

Recent experiments have shown that frequency selectivity measured in tone-on-tone simultaneous masking improves with increasing delay of a brief signal relative to the onset of a longer duration gated masker. To determine whether a similar improvement occurs for a notched-noise masker, threshold was measured for a 20-ms signal presented at the beginning, the temporal center, or the end of the 400-ms masker (simultaneous masking), or immediately following the masker (forward masking). The notch width was varied systematically and the notch was placed both symmetrically and asymmetrically about the 1-kHz signal frequency. Growth-of-masking functions were determined for each temporal condition, for a noise masker without a spectral notch. These functions were used to express the thresholds from the notched-noise experiment in terms of the level of a flat-spectrum noise which would produce the same threshold. In simultaneous masking the auditory filter shapes derived from the transformed data did not change significantly with signal delay, suggesting that the selectivity of the auditory filter does not develop over time. In forward masking the auditory filter shapes were sharper than those for simultaneous masking, particularly on the high-frequency side, which was attributed to suppression.     

Forward-masking properties of multicomponent signals in normal and hearing-impaired subjects

The forward-masking properties of inharmonic complex stimuli were measured both for normal and hearing-impaired subjects. The signal threshold for a 1000-Hz pure-tone probe was obtained for six different maskers, which varied in the number of pure-tone components. The masking stimuli consisted of 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, or 11 components, logarithmically spaced in frequency surrounding the signal and presented at a fixed level of 80 dB SPL per component. In most normal-hearing subjects, the threshold for the probe decreased as the number of masking components was increased, demonstrating that stimuli with more components tended to be less effective maskers. Results from hearing-impaired subjects showed no decrease in threshold with increasing number of masking components. Instead, the thresholds increased as more components were added to the first masker. These results appear to be consistent with suppression effects within the multicomponent maskers for the normal subjects and a lack of suppression effects for the hearing-impaired subjects. The results from the normal-hearing subjects are also consistent with "across-channel" cuing.