Three new phosphoric triamides with a [C(O)NH]P(O)[N(C)(C)]2 skeleton: a database analysis of C—N—C and P—N—C bond angles

In N,N,N′,N′‐tetraethyl‐N′′‐(4‐fluorobenzoyl)phosphoric triamide, C₁₅H₂₅FN₃O₂P, (I), and N‐(2,6‐difluorobenzoyl)‐N′,N′′‐bis(4‐methylpiperidin‐1‐yl)phosphoric triamide, C₁₉H₂₈F₂N₃O₂P, (II), the C—N—C angle at each tertiary N atom is significantly smaller than the two P—N—C angles. For the other new structure, N,N′‐dicyclohexyl‐N′′‐(2‐fluorobenzoyl)‐N,N′‐dimethylphosphoric triamide, C₂₁H₃₃FN₃O₂P, (III), one C—N—C angle [117.08 (12)°] has a greater value than the related P—N—C angle [115.59 (9)°] at the same N atom. Furthermore, for most of the analogous structures with a [C(=O)NH]P(=O)[N(C)(C)]₂ skeleton deposited in the Cambridge Structural Database [CSD; Allen (2002). Acta Cryst. B 58 , 380–388], the C—N—C angle is significantly smaller than the two P—N—C angles; exceptions were found for four structures with the N‐methylcyclohexylamide substituent, similar to (III), one structure with the seven‐membered cyclic amide azepan‐1‐yl substituent and one structure with an N‐methylbenzylamide substituent. The asymmetric units of (I), (II) and (III) contain one molecule, and in the crystal structures, adjacent molecules are linked via pairs of N—H...O=P hydrogen bonds to form dimers.     

A new phosphorothioic triamide structure: P(S)[NHCH2C6H5]3

The structure of N,N′,N′′‐tribenzylphosphorothioic triamide, C₂₁H₂₄N₃PS, (I), and analysis of the bond‐angle sums at the N atoms for this compound, and for 74 structures with a P(S)[N]₃ skeleton and the N atom in a three‐coordinate geometry found in the Cambridge Structural Database [CSD; Groom & Allen (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 , 662–671], are reported. For (I), the bond‐angle sum at one of the N atoms [359 (1)°] shows a nearly planar configuration, while the other two show a nonplanar geometry with bond‐angle sums of 342 (1) and 347 (1)°. The location of the atoms attached to the nonplanar N atoms suggests an anti orientation of the corresponding lone electron pairs (LEPs) on these N atoms with respect to the P=S group. For 74 structures with a P(S)[N]₃ skeleton and with the N atom in a three‐coordinate geometry, the bond‐angle sums at the N atoms were found to be in the range 293–360°. Among 307 such three‐coordinate N atoms, 39% (120 N atoms) have bond‐angle sums in the range 359–360°, in accordance with sp² hybridization, and 45% (138 N atoms) have bond‐angle sums in the range 352–359°, with hybridization close to sp². For the orientation of the LEP with respect to the P=S group, the anti orientation was found to be a general rule for N atoms, with the corresponding bond‐angle sums deviating by more than 8° from the planar value of 360°. In the title structure, the S atom takes part in intermolecular (N—H...)(N—H...)S hydrogen bonds, connecting the molecules into extended chains parallel to the b axis. The co‐operation of one N atom in an N—H...S hydrogen bond as an H‐atom donor, and in an N—H...N hydrogen bond as an acceptor, is a novel feature of the crystal structure.     

Two new thiophosphoramide structures: N,N′,N′′‐tricyclohexylphosphorothioic triamide and O,O′‐diethyl (2‐phenylhydrazin‐1‐yl)thiophosphonate

The compound N,N′,N′′‐tricyclohexylphosphorothioic triamide, C₁₈H₃₆N₃PS or P(S)[NHC₆H₁₁]₃, (I), crystallizes in the space group Pnma with the molecule lying across a mirror plane; one N atom lies on the mirror plane, whereas the bond‐angle sum at the other N atom has a deviation of some 8° from the ideal value of 360° for a planar configuration. The orientation of the atoms attached to this nonplanar N atom corresponds to an anti orientation of the corresponding lone electron pair (LEP) with respect to the P=S group. The P=S bond length of 1.9785 (6) Å is within the expected range for compounds with a P(S)[N]₃ skeleton; however, it is in the region of the longest bond lengths found for analogous structures. This may be due to the involvement of the P=S group in N—H...S=P hydrogen bonds. In O,O′‐diethyl (2‐phenylhydrazin‐1‐yl)thiophosphonate, C₁₀H₁₇N₂O₂PS or P(S)[OC₂H₅]₂[NHNHC₆H₅], (II), the bond‐angle sum at the N atom attached to the phenyl ring is 345.1°, whereas, for the N atom bonded to the P atom, a practically planar environment is observed, with a bond‐angle sum of 359.1°. A Cambridge Structural Database [CSD; Allen (2002). Acta Cryst. B 58 , 380–388] analysis shows a shift of the maximum population of P=S bond lengths in compounds with a P(S)[O]₂[N] skeleton to the shorter bond lengths relative to compounds with a P(S)[N]₃ skeleton. The influence of this difference on the collective tendencies of N...S distances in N—H...S hydrogen bonds for structures with P(S)[N]₃ and P(S)[O]₂[N] segments were studied through a CSD analysis.     

N,N,N′,N′,N″‐Pentamethyl‐N″‐[(trifluorosilyl)methyl] phosphoric triamide. First example of the existence of intramolecular PO→Si coordination bond in the Si‐containing phosphoric triamides

The N,N,N′,N′,N″‐pentamethyl‐N″‐(trifluorosilylmethyl)phosphoric triamide O?P(NMe₂)₂N(Me) CH₂SiF₃ with intramolecular P?O→Si coordination was formed by the reaction of N,N,N′,N′,N″‐pentamethyl‐N″[(triethoxysilyl)methyl]phosphoric triamide with BF₃·Et₂O. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Two new XP(O)[NHC(CH3)3]2 phosphoramidates,with X = (CH3)2N and [(CH3)3CNH]2P(O)(O)

In N,N′‐di‐tert‐butyl‐N′′,N′′‐dimethylphosphoric triamide, C₁₀H₂₆N₃OP, (I), and N,N′,N′′,N′′′‐tetra‐tert‐butoxybis(phosphonic diamide), C₁₆H₄₀N₄O₃P₂, (II), the extended structures are mediated by P(O)...(H—N)₂ interactions. The asymmetric unit of (I) consists of six independent molecules which aggregate through P(O)...(H—N)₂ hydrogen bonds, giving R₂¹(6) loops and forming two independent chains parallel to the a axis. Of the 12 independent tert‐butyl groups, five are disordered over two different positions with occupancies ranging from to . In the structure of (II), the asymmetric unit contains one molecule. P(O)...(H—N)₂ hydrogen bonds give S(6) and R₂²(8) rings, and the molecules form extended chains parallel to the c axis. The structures of (I) and (II), along with similar structures having (N)P(O)(NH)₂ and (NH)₂P(O)(O)P(O)(NH)₂ skeletons extracted from the Cambridge Structural Database, are used to compare hydrogen‐bond patterns in these families of phosphoramidates. The strengths of P(O)[...H—N]_x (x = 1, 2 or 3) hydrogen bonds are also analysed, using these compounds and previously reported structures with (N)₂P(O)(NH) and P(O)(NH)₃ fragments.     

The hydrogen‐bonded dimers of N,N′,N′′‐tricyclohexylphosphoric triamide in new tin(IV) and copper(II) complexes

In the new tin(IV) and copper(II) complexes, cis‐dichlorido‐trans‐dimethyl‐cis‐bis(N,N′,N′′‐tricyclohexylphosphoric triamide‐κO)tin(IV), [Sn(CH₃)₂Cl₂(C₁₈H₃₆N₃OP)₂], (I), and trans‐diaquabis(N,N′,N′′‐tricyclohexylphosphoric triamide‐κO)copper(II) dinitrate–N,N′,N′′‐tricyclohexylphosphoric triamide (1/2), [Cu(C₁₈H₃₆N₃OP)₂(H₂O)₂](NO₃)₂·2C₁₈H₃₆N₃OP, (II), the N,N′,N′′‐tricyclohexylphosphoric triamide (PTA) ligands exist as hydrogen‐bonded dimers via P=O...H—N interactions around the metal center. The asymmetric unit in (I) consists of one complete complex molecule located on a general position. The Sn^IV coordination geometry is octahedral with two cis hydrogen‐bonded PTA ligands, two cis chloride ligands and two trans methyl groups. The asymmetric unit in (II) contains one half of a [Cu(PTA)₂(H₂O)₂]²⁺ dication on a special position (site symmetry for the Cu atom), one nitrate anion and one free PTA molecule, both on general positions. The complex adopts a square‐planar trans‐[CuO₂O₂] coordination geometry, with the Cu^II ion coordinated by two PTA ligands and two water molecules. Each of the noncoordinated PTA molecules is hydrogen bonded to a neighboring coordinated PTA molecule and an adjacent water molecule; the phosphoryl O atom acts as a double‐H‐atom acceptor. The P atoms in the PTA ligands of both complexes and in the noncoordinated hydrogen‐bonded molecules in (II) adopt a slightly distorted tetrahedral environment.     

Different cyclic motifs in phosphoric triamides containing a C(O)NHP(O)(NH)2 skeleton and an R22(10) graph set in three new compounds: a database analysis of hydrogen‐bond strengths based on motifs

In the crystal networks of N,N′‐bis(2‐chlorobenzyl)‐N′′‐(2,6‐difluorobenzoyl)phosphoric triamide, C₂₁H₁₈Cl₂F₂N₃O₂P, (I), N‐(2,6‐difluorobenzoyl)‐N′,N′′‐bis(4‐methoxybenzyl)phosphoric triamide, C₂₃H₂₄F₂N₃O₄P, (II), and N‐(2‐chloro‐2,2‐difluoroacetyl)‐N′,N′′‐bis(4‐methylphenyl)phosphoric triamide, C₁₆H₁₇ClF₂N₃O₂P, (III), C=O...H—N_C(O)NHP(O) and P=O...H—N_amide hydrogen bonds are responsible for the aggregation of the molecules. This is the opposite result from that commonly observed for carbacylamidophosphates, which show a tendency for the phosphoryl group, rather than the carbonyl counterpart, to form hydrogen bonds with the NH group of the C(O)NHP(O) skeleton. This hydrogen‐bond pattern leads to cyclic R₂²(10) motifs in (I)–(III), different from those found for all previously reported compounds of the general formula RC(O)NHP(O)[NR¹R²]₂ with the syn orientation of P=O versus NH [R₂²(8)], and also from those commonly observed for RC(O)NHP(O)[NHR¹]₂ [a sequence of alternate R₂²(8) and R₂²(12) motifs]. In these cases, the R₂²(8) and R₂²(12) graph sets are formed through similar kinds of hydrogen bond, i.e. a pair of P=O...H—N_C(O)NHP(O) hydrogen bonds for the former and two C=O...H—N_amide hydrogen bonds for the latter. This article also reviews 102 similar structures deposited in the Cambridge Structural Database and with the International Union of Crystallography, with the aim of comparing hydrogen‐bond strengths in the above‐mentioned cyclic motifs. This analysis shows that the strongest N—H...O hydrogen bonds exist in the R₂²(8) rings of some molecules. The phosphoryl and carbonyl groups in each of compounds (I)–(III) are anti with respect to each other and the P atoms are in a tetrahedral coordination environment. In the crystal structures, adjacent molecules are linked via the above‐mentioned hydrogen bonds in a linear arrangement, parallel to [010] for (I) and (III) and parallel to [100] for (II). Formation of the N_C(O)NHP(O)—H...O=C instead of the N_C(O)NHP(O)—H...O=P hydrogen bond is reflected in the higher N_C(O)NHP(O)—H vibrational frequencies for these molecules compared with previously reported analogous compounds.     

The double H‐atom acceptability of the P=O group in new XP(O)(NHCH2C6H4‐2‐Cl)2 phosphoramidates [X = C6H5O– and CF3C(O)NH–]: a database analysis of compounds having a P(O)(NHR) group

In the hydrogen‐bond patterns of phenyl bis(2‐chlorobenzylamido)phosphinate, C₂₀H₁₉Cl₂N₂O₂P, (I), and N,N′‐bis(2‐chlorobenzyl)‐N′′‐(2,2,2‐trifluoroacetyl)phosphoric triamide, C₁₆H₁₅Cl₂F₃N₃O₂P, (II), the O atoms of the related phosphoryl groups act as double H‐atom acceptors, so that the P=O...(H—N)₂ hydrogen bond in (I) and the P=O...(H—N_amide)₂ and C=O...H—N_C(O)NHP(O) hydrogen bonds in (II) are responsible for the aggregation of the molecules in the crystal packing. The presence of a double H‐atom acceptor centre is a result of the involvement of a greater number of H‐atom donor sites with a smaller number of H‐atom acceptor sites in the hydrogen‐bonding interactions. This article also reviews structures having a P(O)NH group, with the aim of finding similar three‐centre hydrogen bonds in the packing of phosphoramidate compounds. This analysis shows that the factors affecting the preference of the above‐mentioned O atom to act as a double H‐atom acceptor are: (i) a higher number of H‐atom donor sites relative to H‐atom acceptor centres in molecules with P(=O)(NH)₃, (N)P(=O)(NH)₂, C(=O)NHP(=O)(NH)₂ and (NH)₂P(=O)OP(=O)(NH)₂ groups, and (ii) the remarkable H‐atom acceptability of this atom relative to the other acceptor centre(s) in molecules containing an OP(=O)(NH)₂ group, with the explanation that the N atom bound to the P atom in almost all of the structures found does not take part in hydrogen bonding as an acceptor. Moreover, the differences in the H‐atom acceptability of the phosphoryl O atom relative to the O atom of the alkoxy or phenoxy groups in amidophosphoric acid esters may be illustrated by considering the molecular packing of compounds having (O)₂P(=O)(NH) and (O)P(=O)(NH)(N)groups, in which the unique N—H unit in the above‐mentioned molecules almost always selects the phosphoryl O atom as a partner in forming hydrogen‐bond interactions. The P atoms in (I) and (II) are in tetrahedral coordination environments, and the phosphoryl and carbonyl groups in (II) are anti with respect to each other (the P and C groups are separated by one N atom). In the crystal structures of (I) and (II), adjacent molecules are linked via the above‐mentioned hydrogen bonds into a linear arrangement parallel to [100] in both cases, in (I) by forming R₂²(8) rings and in (II) through a combination of R₂²(10) and R₂¹(6) rings.     

Syntheses and structures of four new mixed‐amide phosphoric triamides

Phosphoric triamides have extensive applications in biochemistry and are also used as O‐donor ligands. Four new mixed‐amide phosphoric triamide structures, namely rac‐N‐tert‐butyl‐N′,N′′‐dicyclohexyl‐N′′‐methylphosphoric triamide, C₁₇H₃₆N₃OP, (I), rac‐N,N′‐dicyclohexyl‐N′‐methyl‐N′′‐(p‐tolyl)phosphoric triamide, C₂₀H₃₄N₃OP, (II), N,N′,N′′‐tricyclohexyl‐N′′‐methylphosphoric triamide, C₁₉H₃₈N₃OP, (III), and 2‐[cyclohexyl(methyl)amino]‐5,5‐dimethyl‐1,3,2λ⁵‐diazaphosphinan‐2‐one, C₁₂H₂₆N₃OP, (IV), have been synthesized and studied by X‐ray diffraction and spectroscopic methods. Structures (I) and (II) are the first diffraction studies of acyclic racemic mixed‐amide phosphoric triamides. The P—N bonds resulting from the different substituent –N(CH₃)(C₆H₁₁), (C₆H₁₁)NH–, 4‐CH₃‐C₆H₄NH–, (tert‐C₄H₉)NH– and –NHCH₂C(CH₃)₂CH₂NH– groups are compared, along with the different molecular volumes and electron‐donor strengths. In all four structures, the molecules form extended chains through N—H…O hydrogen bonds.     

New rac‐XP(O)(OC6H5)(NHC6H4‐p‐CH3) [X = N(CH3)(cyclo‐C6H11) and NH(C3H5)] and rac‐(C6H5CH2NH)P(O)(OC6H5)(NH‐cyclo‐C6H11) mixed‐amide phosphinates

The mixed‐amide phosphinates, rac‐phenyl (N‐methylcyclohexylamido)(p‐tolylamido)phosphinate, C₂₀H₂₇N₂O₂P, (I), and rac‐phenyl (allylamido)(p‐tolylamido)phosphinate, C₁₆H₁₉N₂O₂P, (II), were synthesized from the racemic phosphorus–chlorine compound (R,S)‐(Cl)P(O)(OC₆H₅)(NHC₆H₄‐p‐CH₃). Furthermore, the phosphorus–chlorine compound ClP(O)(OC₆H₅)(NH‐cyclo‐C₆H₁₁) was synthesized for the first time and used for the synthesis of rac‐phenyl (benzylamido)(cyclohexylamido)phosphinate, C₁₉H₂₅N₂O₂P, (III). The strategies for the synthesis of racemic mixed‐amide phosphinates are discussed. The P atom in each compound is in a distorted tetrahedral (N¹)P(=O)(O)(N²) environment. In (I) and (II), the p‐tolylamido substituent makes a longer P—N bond than those involving the N‐methylcyclohexylamido and allylamido substituents. In (III), the differences between the P—N bond lengths involving the cyclohexylamido and benzylamido substituents are not significant. In all three structures, the phosphoryl O atom takes part with the N—H unit in hydrogen‐bonding interactions, viz. an N—H...O=P hydrogen bond for (I) and (N—H)(N—H)...O=P hydrogen bonds for (II) and (III), building linear arrangements along [001] for (I) and along [010] for (III), and a ladder arrangement along [100] for (II).     

Tris­[2‐(benzoyl­amino)­ethyl]­amine

Tris­[2‐(benzoyl­amino)­ethyl]­amine [alternatively, N,N′,N′′‐(nitrilo­tri­ethyl)­tri­benz­amide], C₂₇H₃₀N₄O₃, adopts a folded structure, forming a symmetrical cavity with an average depth of 7.3 Å and width ranging from 4.1–4.4 Å. The folded structure is a result of one intramolecular N—H?O hydrogen bond. A linear chain motif along the c axis best describes the extended intermolecular N—H?O hydrogen bonding.     

Chiral one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded architectures constructed from single‐enantiomer phosphoric triamides

The two single‐enantiomer phosphoric triamides N‐(2,6‐difluorobenzoyl)‐N′,N′′‐bis[(S)‐(−)‐α‐methylbenzyl]phosphoric triamide, [2,6‐F₂‐C₆H₃C(O)NH][(S)‐(−)‐(C₆H₅)CH(CH₃)NH]₂P(O), denoted L‐1 , and N‐(2,6‐difluorobenzoyl)‐N′,N′′‐bis[(R)‐(+)‐α‐methylbenzyl]phosphoric triamide, [2,6‐F₂‐C₆H₃C(O)NH][(R)‐(+)‐(C₆H₅)CH(CH₃)NH]₂P(O), denoted D‐1 , both C₂₃H₂₄F₂N₃O₂P, have been investigated. In their structures, chiral one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded architectures are formed along [100], mediated by relatively strong N—H…O(P) and N—H…O(C) hydrogen bonds. Both assemblies include the noncentrosymmetric graph‐set motifs R₂²(10), R₂¹(6) and C₂²(8), and the compounds crystallize in the chiral space group P1. Due to the data collection of L‐1 at 120 K and of D‐1 at 95 K, the unit‐cell dimensions and volume show a slight difference; the contraction in the volume of D‐1 with respect to that in L‐1 is about 0.3%. The asymmetric units of both structures consist of two independent phosphoric triamide molecules, with the main difference being seen in one of the torsion angles in the OPNHCH(CH₃)(C₆H₅) part. The Hirshfeld surface maps of these levo and dextro isomers are very similar; however, they are near mirror images of each other. For both structures, the full fingerprint plot of each symmetry‐independent molecule shows an almost asymmetric shape as a result of its different environment in the crystal packing. It is notable that NMR spectroscopy could distinguish between compounds L‐1 and D‐1 that have different relative stereocentres; however, the differences in chemical shifts between them were found to be about 0.02 to 0.001 ppm under calibrated temperature conditions. In each molecule, the two chiral parts are also different in NMR media, in which chemical shifts and P–H and P–C couplings have been studied.     

Bis[μ3‐cis‐N‐(2‐aminopropyl)‐N′‐(2‐carboxylatophenyl)oxamidato(3–)]bis(2,2′‐bipyridine)dichloridotetracopper(II) dihydrate

The title complex, bis[μ₃‐cis‐N‐(2‐aminopropyl)‐N′‐(2‐carboxylatophenyl)oxamidato(3−)]‐1:2:4κ⁷N,N′,N′′,O:O′,O′′:O′′′;2:3:4κ⁷O′′′:N,N′,N′′,O:O′,O′′‐bis(2,2′‐bipyridine)‐2κ²N,N′;4κ²N,N′‐dichlorido‐1κCl,3κCl‐tetracopper(II) dihydrate, [Cu₄(C₁₂H₁₂N₃O₄)₂Cl₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂]·2H₂O, consists of a neutral cyclic tetracopper(II) system having an embedded centre of inversion and two solvent water molecules. The coordination of each Cu^II atom is square‐pyramidal. The separations of Cu^II atoms bridged by cis‐N‐(2‐aminopropyl)‐N′‐(2‐carboxylatophenyl)oxamidate(3−) and carboxyl groups are 5.2096 (4) and 5.1961 (5) Å, respectively. A three‐dimensional supramolecular structure involving hydrogen bonding and aromatic stacking is observed.     

(2,6‐Bis{1‐[4‐(dimethylamino)phenylimino]ethyl}pyridine)dichlorido(triphenylphosphine‐κP)ruthenium(II): a zigzag chain of fused centrosymmetric R22(12) rings

The title compound, [RuCl₂(C₂₅H₂₉N₅)(C₁₈H₁₅P)], a transfer hydrogenation catalyst, is supported by an N,N′,N′′‐tridentate pyridine‐bridged ligand and triphenylphosphine. The Ru^II centre is six‐coordinated in a distorted octahedral arrangement, with the two Cl atoms located in the axial positions, and the pyridine (py) N atom, the two imino N atoms and the triphenylphosphine P atom located in the equatorial plane. The two equatorial Ru—N_imino distances (mean 2.093 Å) are substantially longer than the equatorial Ru—N_py bond [1.954 (4) Å]. It is observed that the N_imino—M—N_py bond angle for the five‐membered chelate rings of 2,6‐bis(imino)pyridine‐based complexes is inversely related to the magnitude of the M—N_py bond. The title structure is stabilized by intra‐ and intermolecular C—H...Cl hydrogen bonds, as well as by intramolecular π–π stacking interactions between the aromatic rings belonging to the triphenylphosphine ligand and the dimethylaminophenyl fragment. The intermolecular hydrogen bonds form an R₂²(12) ring and a zigzag chain of fused centrosymmetric rings running parallel to the [100] direction.     

(Acetonitrile‐κN){2‐[bis­(2‐pyridylethyl)­amino]ethanol‐κ4N,N′,N′′,O}zinc(II) bis­(perchlorate) monohydrate

In the title compound, [Zn(C₂H₃N)(C₁₆H₂₁N₃O)](ClO₄)₂·H₂O, the Zn^II ion is coordinated by two pyridyl N atoms, one amine N atom, and an ethanol O atom from the N,N′,N′′,O‐tetra­dentate 2‐[bis­(2‐pyridylethyl)amino]­ethanol donor ligand. The fifth coordination site is filled by an acetonitrile N atom, and there is one solvent water mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit. The 2+ charge of the cationic portion of the complex is balanced by two perchlorate counter‐anions.     

Aqua(dipicolinato‐κ3O2,N,O6)(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ2N,N′)manganese(II) monohydrate

In the title compound [systematic name: aqua(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)(pyridine‐2,6‐di­carboxyl­ato‐κ³O²,N,O⁶)manganese(II) monohydrate, [Mn(C₇H₃NO₄)(C₁₂H₈N₂)(H₂O)]·H₂O, the manganese(II) centre is surrounded by one bidentate phenanthroline ligand [Mn—N = 2.248 (3) and 2.278 (3) Å], one tridentate dipicolinate ligand [Mn—N = 2.179 (3) Å, and Mn—O = 2.237 (2) and 2.266 (2) Å] and one water mol­ecule [Mn—O = 2.117 (3) Å], and it exhibits a strongly distorted octahedral geometry, with trans angles ranging from 144.12 (9) to 158.88 (11)°. Extensive intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding interactions involving coordinated and uncoordinated water mol­ecules and the carboxyl O atoms of the dipicolinate ligand, as well as a stacking interaction involving the phenanthroline rings, are observed in the crystal structure.     

2J(P,C) and 3J(P,C) Coupling Constants in Some New Phosphoramidates. Crystal Structures of CF3C(O)N(H)P(O)[N(CH3)(CH2C6H5)]2 and 4‐NO2‐C6H4N(H)P(O)[4‐CH3‐NC5H9]2

Some new phosphoramidates were synthesized and characterized by ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR, IR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The structures of CF₃C(O)N(H)P(O)[N(CH₃)(CH₂C₆H₅)]₂ ( 1 ) and 4‐NO₂‐C₆H₄N(H)P(O)[4‐CH₃‐NC₅H₉]₂ ( 6 ) were confirmed by X‐ray single crystal determination. Compound 1 forms a centrosymmetric dimer and compound 6 forms a polymeric zigzag chain, both via ‐N‐H…O=P‐ intermolecular hydrogen bonds. Also, weak C‐H…F and C‐H…O hydrogen bonds were observed in compounds 1 and 6 , respectively. ¹³C NMR spectra were used for study of ²J(P,C) and ³J(P,C) coupling constants that were showed in the molecules containing N(C₂H₅)₂ and N(C₂H₅)(CH₂C₆H₅) moieties, ²J(P,C)>³J(P,C). A contrast result was obtained for the compounds involving a five‐membered ring aliphatic amine group, NC₄H₈. ²J(P,C) for N(C₂H₅)₂ moiety and in NC₄H₈ are nearly the same, but ³J(P, C) values are larger than those in molecules with a pyrrolidinyl ring. This comparison was done for compounds with six and seven‐membered ring amine groups. In compounds with formula XP(O)[N(CH₂R)(CH₂C₆H₅)]₂, ²J(P,CH₂)_benzylic>²J(P,CH₂)_aliphatic, in an agreement with our previous study.     

[2,6‐Bis(1H‐benzimidazol‐2‐yl‐κN3)­pyridine‐κN](di­methyl­form­amide‐κO)­(thio­sulfato‐κ2O,S)­nickel(II) mono­hydrate

The structure of the title compound, [Ni(ths)(bbip)(dmf)]·­H₂O [ths is thio­sulfate, S₂O₃; bbip is 2,6‐bis(1H‐benz­imidazol‐2‐yl)­pyridine, C₂₁H₁₃N₅; and dmf is di­methyl­form­amide, C₃H₇NO], is monomeric, with the nickel ion octahe­drally surrounded by an N,N′,N′′‐tridentate bbip mol­ecule, an S,O‐bidentate ths mol­ecule and an O‐monodentate dmf mol­ecule. The H atoms of the hydration water mol­ecule and the amino groups of bbip are involved in hydrogen bonding and determine a spatial organization of broad layers parallel to (001), which are connected by weak interactions.     

A pseudo‐cage complex of silver(I) with tripodal tetraamine having benzyl end groups, {tris[2‐(benzylamino)ethyl]amine‐κ4N}silver(I) perchlorate

The synthesis and crystal structure of {tris­[2‐(benzyl­amino)­ethyl]­amine‐κ⁴N}silver(I) perchlorate, [Ag(C₂₇H₃₆N₄)]ClO₄ or [Ag(bz₃tren)]ClO₄ {bz₃tren is tris­[2‐(benzyl­amino)­ethyl]­amine or N,N′,N′′‐tri­benzyl­tris(2‐amino­ethyl)­amine} are reported. The Ag atom is coordinated to four N atoms of the tren unit and is located 0.604 (3) Å out of the trigonal plane described by the three secondary amine N atoms, away from the bridgehead N atom. Edge‐to‐face π–π interactions between the aromatic end groups, and weak interactions between Ag and arene, allow the formation of a pseudo‐cage complex.     

[N,N′‐Bis(3‐aminopropyl)ethylenediamine‐κ4N,N′,N′′,N′′′](trithiocyanurato‐κ2N,S)zinc(II) ethanol solvate

In the crystal structure of the title compound, [N,N′‐bis(3‐­amino­propyl)­ethyl­enedi­amine‐κ⁴N,N′,N′′,N′′′][1,3,5‐triazine‐2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)‐tri­thionato(2−)‐κ²N,S]­zinc(II) ethanol sol­vate, [Zn(C₈H₂₂N₄)₂(C₃HN₃S₃)]·C₂H₆O, the Zn^II atom is octa­hedrally coordinated by four N atoms [Zn—N = 2.104 (2)–2.203 (2) Å] of a tetradentate N‐donor N,N′‐bis(3‐­amino­propyl)­ethyl­enedi­amine (bapen) ligand and by two S and N atoms [Zn—S = 2.5700 (7) Å and Zn—N = 2.313 (2) Å] of a tri­thio­cyanurate(2−) (ttcH²⁻) dianion bonded as a bidentate ligand in a cis configuration. The crystal structure of the compound is stabilized by a network of hydrogen bonds.