Six two‐ and three‐component ammonium carboxylate salt structures with a ladder‐type hydrogen‐bonding motif,three incorporating neutral carboxylic acid molecules

Six ammonium carboxylate salts are synthesized and reported, namely 2‐propylammonium benzoate, C₃H₁₀N⁺·C₇H₅O₂⁻, (I), benzylammonium (R)‐2‐phenylpropionate, C₆H₁₀N⁺·C₉H₉O₂⁻, (II), (RS)‐1‐phenylethylammonium naphthalene‐1‐carboxylate, C₈H₁₂N⁺·C₁₁H₇O₂⁻, (III), benzylammonium–benzoate–benzoic acid (1/1/1), C₆H₁₀N⁺·C₇H₅O₂⁻·C₇H₆O₂, (IV), cyclopropylammonium–benzoate–benzoic acid (1/1/1), C₃H₈N⁺·C₇H₅O₂⁻·C₇H₆O₂, (V), and cyclopropylammonium–ea‐cis‐cyclohexane‐1,4‐dicarboxylate–ee‐trans‐cyclohexane‐1,4‐dicarboxylic acid (2/1/1), 2C₃H₈N⁺·C₈H₁₀O₄²⁻·C₈H₁₂O₄, (VI). Salts (I)–(III) all have a 1:1 ratio of cation to anion and feature three N⁺—H...O⁻ hydrogen bonds which form one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded ladders. Salts (I) and (II) have type II ladders, consisting of repeating R₄³(10) rings, while (III) has type III ladders, in this case consisting of alternating R₄²(8) and R₄⁴(12) rings. Salts (IV) and (V) have a 1:1:1 ratio of cation to anion to benzoic acid. They have type III ladders formed by three N⁺—H...O⁻ hydrogen bonds, while the benzoic acid molecules are pendant to the ladders and hydrogen bond to them via O—H...O⁻ hydrogen bonds. Salt (VI) has a 2:1:1 ratio of cation to anion to acid and does not feature any hydrogen‐bonded ladders; instead, the ionized and un‐ionized components form a three‐dimensional network of hydrogen‐bonded rings. The two‐component 1:1 salts are formed from a 1:1 ratio of amine to acid. To create the three‐component salts (IV)–(VI), the ratio of amine to acid was reduced so as to deprotonate only half of the acid molecules, and then to observe how the un‐ionized acid molecules are incorporated into the ladder motif. For (IV) and (V), the ratio of amine to acid was reduced to 1:2, while for (VI) the ratio of amine to acid required to deprotonate only half the diacid molecules was 1:1.     

Cyclic heterotetrameric and low‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded polymeric structures in the morpholinium salts of ring‐substituted benzoic acid analogues

The morpholinium (tetrahydro‐2H‐1,4‐oxazin‐4‐ium) cation has been used as a counter‐ion in both inorganic and organic salt formation and particularly in metal complex stabilization. To examine the influence of interactive substituent groups in the aromatic rings of benzoic acids upon secondary structure generation, the anhydrous salts of morpholine with salicylic acid, C₄H₁₀NO⁺·C₇H₅O₃⁻, (I), 3,5‐dinitrosalicylic acid, C₄H₁₀NO⁺·C₇H₃N₂O₇⁻, (II), 3,5‐dinitrobenzoic acid, C₄H₁₀NO⁺·C₇H₃N₂O₆⁻, (III), and 4‐nitroanthranilic acid, C₄H₁₀NO⁺·C₇H₅N₂O₄⁻, (IV), have been prepared and their hydrogen‐bonded crystal structures are described. In the crystal structures of (I), (III) and (IV), the cations and anions are linked by moderately strong N—H…O_carboxyl hydrogen bonds, but the secondary structure propagation differs among the three, viz. one‐dimensional chains extending along [010] in (I), a discrete cyclic heterotetramer in (III), and in (IV), a heterotetramer with amine N—H…O hydrogen‐bond extensions along b, giving a two‐layered ribbon structure. With the heterotetramers in both (III) and (IV), the ion pairs are linked though inversion‐related N—H…O_carboxylate hydrogen bonds, giving cyclic R₄⁴(12) motifs. With (II), in which the anion is a phenolate rather than a carboxylate, the stronger assocation is through a symmetric lateral three‐centre cyclic R₁²(6) N—H…(O,O′) hydrogen‐bonding linkage involving the phenolate and nitro O‐atom acceptors of the anion, with extension through a weaker O—H…O_carboxyl hydrogen bond. This results in a one‐dimensional chain structure extending along [100]. In the structures of two of the salts [i.e. (II) and (IV)], there are also π–π ring interactions, with ring‐centroid separations of 3.5516 (9) and 3.7700 (9) Å in (II), and 3.7340 (9) Å in (IV).     

One‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures in the 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of 4,5‐dichlorophthalic acid with 8‐hydroxyquinoline, 8‐aminoquinoline and quinoline‐2‐carboxylic acid (quinaldic acid)

The structures of the 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of 4,5‐dichlorophthalic acid with 8‐hydroxyquinoline, 8‐aminoquinoline and quinoline‐2‐carboxylic acid (quinaldic acid), namely anhydrous 8‐hydroxyquinolinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate, C₉H₈NO⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻, (I), 8‐aminoquinolinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate, C₉H₉N₂⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻, (II), and the adduct hydrate 2‐carboxyquinolinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate quinolinium‐2‐carboxylate monohydrate, C₁₀H₈NO₂⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻·C₁₀H₇NO₂·H₂O, (III), have been determined at 130 K. Compounds (I) and (II) are isomorphous and all three compounds have one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded chain structures, formed in (I) through O—H...O_carboxyl extensions and in (II) through N⁺—H...O_carboxyl extensions of cation–anion pairs. In (III), a hydrogen‐bonded cyclic R₂²(10) pseudo‐dimer unit comprising a protonated quinaldic acid cation and a zwitterionic quinaldic acid adduct molecule is found and is propagated through carboxylic acid O—H...O_carboxyl and water O—H...O_carboxyl interactions. In both (I) and (II), there are also cation–anion aromatic ring π–π associations. This work further illustrates the utility of both hydrogen phthalate anions and interactive‐group‐substituted quinoline cations in the formation of low‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures.     

A two‐dimensional network in the molecular salt 2‐methylimidazolium hydrogen glutarate,and three‐dimensional networks in the salts 2‐methylimidazolium hydrogen succinate and 2‐methylimidazolium hydrogen adipate monohydrate

All three title compounds, C₄H₇N₂⁺·C₄H₅O₄⁻, (I), C₄H₇N₂⁺·C₅H₇O₄⁻, (II), and C₄H₇N₂⁺·C₆H₉O₄⁻·H₂O, (III), can be regarded as 1:1 organic salts. The dicarboxylic acids join through short acid bridges into infinite chains. Compound (I) crystallizes in the noncentrosymmetric Cmc2₁ space group and the asymmetric unit consists of a hydrogen succinate anion located on a mirror plane and a 2‐methylimidazolium cation disordered across the same mirror. The other two compounds crystallize in the triclinic P space group. The carboxylic acid H atom in (II) is disordered over both ends of the anion and sits on inversion centres between adjacent anions, forming symmetric short O...H...O bridges. Two independent anions in (III) sit across inversion centres, again with the carboxylic acid H atom disordered in short O...H...O bridges. The molecules in all three compounds are linked into two‐dimensional networks by combinations of imidazolium–carboxylate N⁺—H...O and carboxylate–carboxylate O—H...O hydrogen bonds. The two‐dimensional networks are further linked into three‐dimensional networks by C—H...O hydrogen bonds in (I) and by O_water—H...O hydrogen bonds in (III). According to the ΔpK_a rule, such 1:1 types of organic salts can be expected unambiguously. However, a 2:1 type of organic salt may be more easily obtained in (II) and (III) than in (I).     

The hydrogen‐bonding patterns of 3‐phenylpropylammonium benzoate and 3‐phenylpropylammonium 3‐iodobenzoate: generation of chiral crystals from achiral molecules

The crystal structures and hydrogen‐bonding patterns of 3‐phenylpropylammonium benzoate, C₉H₁₄N⁺·C₇H₅O₂⁻, (I), and 3‐phenylpropylammonium 3‐iodobenzoate, C₉H₁₄N⁺·C₇H₄IO₂⁻, (II), are reported and compared. The addition of the I atom on the anion in (II) produces a different hydrogen‐bonding pattern to that of (I). In addition, the supramolecular heterosynthon of (II) produces a chiral crystal packing not observed in (I). Compound (I) packs in a centrosymmetric fashion and forms achiral one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded columns through charge‐assisted N—H...O hydrogen bonds. Compound (II) packs in a chiral space group and forms helical one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded columns with 2₁ symmetry, consisting of repeating R₄³(10) hydrogen‐bonded rings that are commonly observed in ammonium carboxylate salts containing chiral molecules. This hydrogen‐bond pattern, which has been observed repeatedly in ammonium carboxylate salts, thus provides a means of producing chiral crystal structures from achiral molecules.     

Hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular motifs in 2‐amino‐4,6‐dimethoxypyrimidinium picrate and pyrimethaminium picrate dimethyl sulfoxide solvate

In the crystal structures of 2‐amino‐4,6‐dimethoxypyrimidinium 2,4,6‐trinitrophenolate (picrate), C₆H₁₀N₃O₂⁺·C₆H₂N₃O₇⁻, (I), and 2,4‐diamino‐5‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐6‐ethylpyrimidin‐1‐ium (pyrimethaminium or PMN) picrate dimethyl sulfoxide solvate, C₁₂H₁₄ClN₄⁺·C₆H₂N₃O₇⁻·C₂H₆OS, (II), the 2‐amino‐4,6‐dimethoxypyrimidine and PMN cations are protonated at one of the pyrimidine N atoms. The picrate anion interacts with the protonated cations through bifurcated N—H...O hydrogen bonds, forming R₂¹(6) and R₁²(6) ring motifs. In (I), Z′ = 2. In (II), two inversion‐related PMN cations are connected through a pair of N—H...N hydrogen bonds involving the 4‐amino group and the uncharged N atom of the pyrimidine ring, forming a cyclic hydrogen‐bonded R₂²(8) motif. In addition to the pairing, the O atom of the dimethyl sulfoxide solvent molecule bridges the 2‐amino and 4‐amino groups on both sides of the paired bases, resulting in a self‐complementary …DADA… array of quadruple hydrogen‐bonding patterns.     

Charge‐assisted hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular networks in acetoguanaminium hydrogen phthalate,acetoguanaminium hydrogen maleate and acetoguanaminium 3‐hydroxypicolinate monohydrate

In 2,4‐diamino‐6‐methyl‐1,3,5‐triazin‐1‐ium (acetoguanaminium) hydrogen phthalate, C₄H₈N₅⁺·C₈H₅O₄⁻, (I), acetoguanaminium hydrogen maleate, C₄H₈N₅⁺·C₄H₃O₄⁻, (II), and acetoguanaminium 3‐hydroxypicolinate monohydrate, C₄H₈N₅⁺·C₆H₄NO₃⁻·H₂O, (III), the acetoguanaminium cations interact with the carboxylate groups of the corresponding anions via a pair of nearly parallel N—H...O hydrogen bonds, forming R₂²(8) ring motifs. In (II) and (III), N—H...N base‐pairing is observed, while there is none in (I). In (II), a series of fused R₃²(8), R₂²(8) and R₃²(8) hydrogen‐bonded rings plus fused R₂²(8), R₆²(12) and R₂²(8) ring motifs occur alternately, aggregating into a supramolecular ladder‐like arrangement. In (III), R₂²(8) motifs occur on either side of a further ring formed by pairs of N—H...O hydrogen bonds, forming an array of three fused hydrogen‐bonded rings. In (I) and (II), the anions form a typical intramolecular O—H...O hydrogen bond with graph set S(7), whereas in (III) an intramolecular hydrogen bond with graph set S(6) is formed.     

Three‐dimensional networks in 5‐methylimidazolium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate and bis(5‐methylimidazolium) 3‐carboxylato‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate

The two title proton‐transfer compounds, 5‐methylimidazolium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate, C₄H₇N₂⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻, (I), and bis(5‐methylimidazolium) 3‐carboxylato‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate, 2C₄H₇N₂⁺·C₇H₅O₆S²⁻, (II), are each organized into a three‐dimensional network by a combination of X—H...O (X = O, N or C) hydrogen bonds, and π–π and C—H...π interactions.     

Charge‐assisted hydrogen bonding in salts of 2‐amino‐1H‐benzimidazole with 3‐phenylpropynoic acid and oct‐2‐ynoic acid

The 100 K structures of two salts, namely 2‐amino‐1H‐benzimidazolium 3‐phenylpropynoate, C₇H₈N₃⁺·C₉H₅O₂⁻, (I), and 2‐amino‐1H‐benzimidazolium oct‐2‐ynoate, C₇H₈N₃⁺·C₈H₁₁O₂⁻, (II), both have monoclinic symmetry (space group P2₁/c) and display N—H...O hydrogen bonding. Both structures show packing with corrugated sheets of hydrogen‐bonded molecules lying parallel to the [001] direction. Two hydrogen‐bonded ring motifs can be identified and described with graph sets R²₂(8) and R⁴₄(16), respectively, in both (I) and (II). Computational chemistry calculations performed on both compounds show that the hydrogen‐bonded ion pairs are more energetically favourable in the crystal structure than their hydrogen–bonded neutral molecule counterparts.     

Two‐dimensional networks in 2‐methylanilinium picrate and 2,5‐dichloroanilinium picrate

Both the title molecular adducts of 2‐methylaniline or 2,5‐dichloroaniline with picric acid are 1:1 organic salts, namely 2‐methylanilinium picrate, C₇H₁₀N⁺·C₆H₂N₃O₇⁻, (I), and 2,5‐dichloroanilinium picrate, C₆H₆Cl₂N⁺·C₆H₂N₃O₇⁻, (II). In both structures, the phenoxide O atoms accept two N—H hydrogen bonds in a bifurcated acceptor fashion, which link the component ions by N—H...O hydrogen bonds into continuous two‐dimensional zigzag layers, running parallel to the (100) plane in (I) and the (010) plane in (II). A π–π interaction is observed between symmetry‐related anilinium cations in (I), while in (II), Cl...O_nitro and Cl...Cl interactions are observed. This study indicates that a substitution on aniline can exert a pivotal influence on the construction of its supramolecular structure.     

Two‐ and three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures in the 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of 4,5‐dichlorophthalic acid with the isomeric monoaminobenzoic acids

The crystal structures of the 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of 4,5‐dichlorophthalic acid with the three isomeric monoaminobenzoic acids, namely the hydrate 2‐carboxyanilinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate dihydrate, C₇H₈NO₂⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻·2H₂O, (I), and the anhydrous salts 3‐carboxyanilinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate, C₇H₈NO₂⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻, (II), and 4‐carboxyanilinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate, C₇H₈NO₂⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻, (III), have been determined at 130 K. Compound (I) has a two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded sheet structure, while (II) and (III) are three‐dimensional. All three compounds feature sheet substructures formed through anilinium N⁺—H...O_carboxyl and anion carboxylic acid O—H...O_carboxyl interactions and, in the case of (I), additionally linked through the donor and acceptor associations of the solvent water molecules. However, (II) and (III) have additional lateral extensions of these substructures though cyclic R²₂(8) associations involving the carboxylic acid groups of the cations. Also, (II) and (III) have cation–anion π–π aromatic ring interactions. This work provides further examples illustrating the regular formation of network substructures in the 1:1 proton‐transfer salts of 4,5‐dichlorophthalic acid with the bifunctional aromatic amines.     

Brucinium 3,5‐dinitro­benzoate methanol solvate,methanol disolvate and trihydrate

Crystals of brucinium 3,5‐dinitro­benzoate methanol solvate, C₂₃H₂₇N₂O₄⁺·C₇H₃N₂O₆⁻·CH₃OH, (I), brucinium 3,5‐dinitro­benzoate methanol disolvate, C₂₃H₂₇N₂O₄⁺·C₇H₃N₂O₆⁻·2CH₃OH, (II), and brucinium 3,5‐dinitro­benzoate trihydrate, C₂₃H₂₇N₂O₄⁺·C₇H₃N₂O₆⁻·3H₂O, (III), were obtained from methanol [for (I) and (II)] or ethanol solutions [for (III)]. The brucinium cations and 3,5‐dinitro­benzoate anions are linked by ionic N—H⁺⋯O⁻ hydrogen bonds. In the crystals of (I), (II) and (III), the brucinium cations exhibit different modes of packing, viz. corrugated ribbons, pillars and corrugated monolayer sheets, respectively. While in (III), the amide O atom of the brucinium cation participates in O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, in which water mol­ecules are the donors, in (I) and (II), the amide O atom of the brucinium cation is involved in weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and other brucinium cations are the donors.     

Supramolecular hydrogen‐bonded networks in adeninium phenylacetate phenylacetic acid monohydrate and adeninium 3‐carboxypropionate monohydrate

In the title compounds, C₅H₆N₅⁺·C₈H₇O₂⁻·C₈H₈O₂·H₂O, (I), and C₅H₆N₅⁺·C₄H₃O₄⁻·H₂O, (II), the adeninium cations form N—H...O hydrogen bonds with their anion counterparts and adeninium–adeninium self‐association base pairs with the R₂²(10) motif (Bernstein et al., 1995). A complete hydrogen‐bonding motif analysis is presented. Conventional hydrogen bonds lead to layer structures in (I) and to two‐dimensional infinite polymeric ribbons in (II). C—H...O interactions are found in both structures, while weak π–π stacking interactions are only observed in (I).     

Hydro­gen bonding in proton‐transfer compounds of 5‐sulfosalicylic acid with bicyclic heteroaromatic Lewis bases

The crystal structures of quinolinium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxy­benzene­sulfonate trihydrate, C₉H₈N⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·3H₂O, (I), 8‐hydroxy­quinolinium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxy­benzene­sulfonate monohydrate, C₉H₈NO⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·H₂O, (II), 8‐amino­quinolinium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxy­benzene­sulfonate dihydrate, C₉H₉N₂⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·2H₂O, (III), and 2‐carboxy­quinolinium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxy­benzene­sulfonate quinolinium‐2‐carboxylate, C₁₀H₈NO₂⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·C₁₀H₇NO₂, (IV), four proton‐transfer compounds of 5‐sulfosalicylic acid with bicyclic heteroaromatic Lewis bases, reveal in each the presence of variously hydrogen‐bonded polymers. In only one of these compounds, viz. (II), is the protonated quinolinium group involved in a direct primary N⁺—H⋯O(sulfonate) hydrogen‐bonding interaction, while in the other hydrates, viz. (I) and (III), the water mol­ecules participate in the primary intermediate interaction. The quinaldic acid (quinoline‐2‐carboxylic acid) adduct, (IV), exhibits cation–cation and anion–adduct hydrogen bonding but no direct formal heteromolecular interaction other than a number of weak cation–anion and cation–adduct π–π stacking associations. In all other compounds, secondary interactions give rise to network polymer structures.     

Three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures in the 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of l‐tartaric acid with the associative‐group monosubstituted pyridines 3‐aminopyridine, 3‐carboxypyridine (nicotinic acid) and 2‐carboxypyridine (picolinic acid)

The 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of l ‐tartaric acid with 3‐aminopyridine [3‐aminopyridinium hydrogen (2R,3R)‐tartrate dihydrate, C₅H₇N₂⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻·2H₂O, (I)], pyridine‐3‐carboxylic acid (nicotinic acid) [anhydrous 3‐carboxypyridinium hydrogen (2R,3R)‐tartrate, C₆H₆NO₂⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻, (II)] and pyridine‐2‐carboxylic acid [2‐carboxypyridinium hydrogen (2R,3R)‐tartrate monohydrate, C₆H₆NO₂⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻·H₂O, (III)] have been determined. In (I) and (II), there is a direct pyridinium–carboxyl N⁺—H...O hydrogen‐bonding interaction, four‐centred in (II), giving conjoint cyclic R₁²(5) associations. In contrast, the N—H...O association in (III) is with a water O‐atom acceptor, which provides links to separate tartrate anions through O_hydroxy acceptors. All three compounds have the head‐to‐tail C(7) hydrogen‐bonded chain substructures commonly associated with 1:1 proton‐transfer hydrogen tartrate salts. These chains are extended into two‐dimensional sheets which, in hydrates (I) and (III) additionally involve the solvent water molecules. Three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures are generated via crosslinking through the associative functional groups of the substituted pyridinium cations. In the sheet struture of (I), both water molecules act as donors and acceptors in interactions with separate carboxyl and hydroxy O‐atom acceptors of the primary tartrate chains, closing conjoint cyclic R₄⁴(8), R₃⁴(11) and R₃³(12) associations. Also, in (II) and (III) there are strong cation carboxyl–carboxyl O—H...O hydrogen bonds [O...O = 2.5387 (17) Å in (II) and 2.441 (3) Å in (III)], which in (II) form part of a cyclic R₂²(6) inter‐sheet association. This series of heteroaromatic Lewis base–hydrogen l ‐tartrate salts provides further examples of molecular assembly facilitated by the presence of the classical two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded hydrogen tartrate or hydrogen tartrate–water sheet substructures which are expanded into three‐dimensional frameworks via peripheral cation bifunctional substituent‐group crosslinking interactions.     

Self‐assembled supramolecular sheet‐ and channel‐type frameworks in the p‐phenetidinium hydrogen phthalate and cyclohexylaminium hydrogen phthalate hemihydrate salts

The title compounds, p‐phenetidinium hydrogen phthalate (or 4‐ethoxyanilinium 2‐carboxybenzoate), C₈H₁₂NO⁺·C₈H₅O₄⁻, (I), and cyclohexylaminium hydrogen phthalate hemihydrate (or cyclohexylaminium 2‐carboxybenzoate hemihydrate), C₆H₁₄N⁺·C₈H₅O₄⁻·0.5H₂O, (II), form two‐ and one‐dimensional supramolecular networks, respectively. In (I), the anionic–cationic network consists of R₃²(6) and R₄⁴(16) hydrogen‐bonded rings forming a two‐dimensional sheet along the (001) plane. In (II), O—H...O hydrogen bonds connect the glide‐related anions, generating a supramolecular chain running parallel to [001] to which the cations are linked to form one‐dimensional channels along [001]. The solvent water molecules, which reside on twofold axes, are trapped inside the molecular channels by N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds.     

Isomorphous crystals of strychninium 4‐chloro­benzoate and strychninium 4‐nitro­benzoate

In strychninium 4‐chloro­benzoate, C₂₁H₂₃N₂O₂⁺·C₇H₄ClO₂⁻, (I), and strychninium 4‐nitro­benzoate, C₂₁H₂₃N₂O₂⁺·C₇H₄NO₄⁻, (II), the strychninium cations form pillars stabilized by C—H⋯O and C—H⋯π hydrogen bonds. Channels between the pillars are occupied by anions linked to one another by C—H⋯π hydrogen bonds. The cations and anions are linked by ionic N—H⁺⋯O⁻ and C—H⋯X hydrogen bonds, where X = O, π and Cl in (I), and O and π in (II).     

Supramolecular association in proton‐transfer adducts containing benzamidinium cations. I. Four molecular salts with uracil derivatives

Four organic salts, namely benzamidinidium orotate (2,6‐dioxo‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyrimidine‐4‐carboxylate) hemihydrate, C₇H₉N₂⁺·C₅H₃N₂O₄⁻·0.5H₂O (BenzamH⁺·Or⁻), (I), benzamidinium isoorotate (2,4‐dioxo‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydropyrimidine‐5‐carboxylate) trihydrate, C₇H₉N₂⁺·C₅H₃N₂O₄⁻·3H₂O (BenzamH⁺·Isor⁻), (II), benzamidinium diliturate (5‐nitro‐2,6‐dioxo‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐4‐olate) dihydrate, C₇H₉N₂⁺·C₄H₂N₃O₅⁻·2H₂O (BenzamH⁺·Dil⁻), (III), and benzamidinium 5‐nitrouracilate (5‐nitro‐2,4‐dioxo‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐1‐ide), C₇H₉N₂⁺·C₄H₂N₃O₄⁻ (BenzamH⁺·Nit⁻), (IV), have been synthesized by a reaction between benzamidine (benzenecarboximidamide or Benzam) and the appropriate carboxylic acid. Proton transfer occurs to the benzamidine imino N atom. In all four acid–base adducts, the asymmetric unit consists of one tautomeric aminooxo anion (Or⁻, Isor⁻, Dil⁻ and Nit⁻) and one monoprotonated benzamidinium cation (BenzamH⁺), plus one‐half (which lies across a twofold axis), three and two solvent water molecules in (I), (II) and (III), respectively. Due to the presence of protonated benzamidine, these acid–base complexes form supramolecular synthons characterized by N⁺—H...O⁻ and N⁺—H...N⁻ (±)‐charge‐assisted hydrogen bonds (CAHB).     

Solvent‐mediated pseudo‐quadruple hydrogen‐bond motifs in three lamotrigine–carboxylic acid complexes

Lamotrigine, an antiepileptic drug, has been complexed with three aromatic carboxylic acids. All three compounds crystallize with the inclusion of N,N‐dimethylformamide (DMF) solvent, viz. lamotriginium [3,5‐diamino‐6‐(2,3‐dichlorophenyl)‐1,2,4‐triazin‐2‐ium] 4‐iodobenzoate N,N‐dimethylformamide monosolvate, C₉H₈Cl₂N₅⁺·C₇H₄IO₂⁻·C₃H₇NO, (I), lamotriginium 4‐methylbenzoate N,N‐dimethylformamide monosolvate, C₉H₇Cl₂N₅⁺·C₈H₈O₂⁻·C₃H₇NO, (II), and lamotriginium 3,5‐dinitro‐2‐hydroxybenzoate N,N‐dimethylformamide monosolvate, C₉H₈Cl₂N₅⁺·C₇H₃N₂O₇⁻·C₃H₇NO, (III). In all three structures, proton transfer takes place from the acid to the lamotrigine molecule. However, in (I) and (II), the acidic H atom is disordered over two sites and there is only partial transfer of the H atom from O to N. In (III), the corresponding H atom is ordered and complete proton transfer has occurred. Lamotrigine–lamotrigine, lamotrigine–acid and lamotrigine–solvent interactions are observed in all three structures and they thereby exhibit isostructurality. The DMF solvent extends the lamotrigine–lamotrigine dimers into a pseudo‐quadruple hydrogen‐bonding motif.     

Zero‐, one‐ and two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures in the 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of 4,5‐dichlorophthalic acid with the monocyclic heteroaromatic Lewis bases 2‐aminopyrimidine,nicotinamide and isonicotinamide

The structures of the anhydrous 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of 4,5‐dichlorophthalic acid (DCPA) with the monocyclic heteroaromatic Lewis bases 2‐aminopyrimidine, 3‐(aminocarbonyl)pyridine (nicotinamide) and 4‐(aminocarbonyl)pyridine (isonicotinamide), namely 2‐aminopyrimidinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate, C₄H₆N₃⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻, (I), 3‐(aminocarbonyl)pyridinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate, C₆H₇N₂O⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻, (II), and the unusual salt adduct 4‐(aminocarbonyl)pyridinium 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate–methyl 2‐carboxy‐4,5‐dichlorobenzoate (1/1), C₆H₇N₂O⁺·C₈H₃Cl₂O₄⁻·C₉H₆Cl₂O₄, (III), have been determined at 130 K. Compound (I) forms discrete centrosymmetric hydrogen‐bonded cyclic bis(cation–anion) units having both R₂²(8) and R₁²(4) N—H...O interactions. In (II), the primary N—H...O‐linked cation–anion units are extended into a two‐dimensional sheet structure via amide–carboxyl and amide–carbonyl N—H...O interactions. The structure of (III) reveals the presence of an unusual and unexpected self‐synthesized methyl monoester of the acid as an adduct molecule, giving one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded chains. In all three structures, the hydrogen phthalate anions are essentially planar with short intramolecular carboxyl–carboxylate O—H...O hydrogen bonds [O...O = 2.393 (8)–2.410 (2) Å]. This work provides examples of low‐dimensional 1:1 hydrogen‐bonded DCPA structure types, and includes the first example of a discrete cyclic `heterotetramer.' This low dimensionality in the structures of the 1:1 aromatic Lewis base salts of the parent acid is generally associated with the planar DCPA anion species.