Molecular Single‐Bond Covalent Radii for Elements 1–118

A self‐consistent system of additive covalent radii, R(AB)=r(A) + r(B), is set up for the entire periodic table, Groups 1–18, Z=1–118. The primary bond lengths, R, are taken from experimental or theoretical data corresponding to chosen group valencies. All r(E) values are obtained from the same fit. Both E–E, E–H, and E–CH₃ data are incorporated for most elements, E. Many E–E′ data inside the same group are included. For the late main groups, the system is close to that of Pauling. For other elements it is close to the methyl‐based one of Suresh and Koga [J. Phys. Chem. A 2001 , 105, 5940] and its predecessors. For the diatomic alkalis MM′ and halides XX′, separate fits give a very high accuracy. These primary data are then absorbed with the rest. The most notable exclusion are the transition‐metal halides and chalcogenides which are regarded as partial multiple bonds. Other anomalies include H₂ and F₂. The standard deviation for the 410 included data points is 2.8 pm.     

3‐Rhoda‐1,2‐diazacyclopentanes: A Series of Novel Metallacycle Complexes Derived From CN Functionalization of Ethylene

Rh‐containing metallacycles, [(TPA)Rh^III(κ²‐(C,N)‐CH₂CH₂(NR)₂‐]Cl; TPA=N,N,N,N‐tris(2‐pyridylmethyl)amine have been accessed through treatment of the Rh^I ethylene complex, [(TPA)Rh(η²‐CH₂CH₂)]Cl ([ 1 ]Cl) with substituted diazenes. We show this methodology to be tolerant of electron‐deficient azo compounds including azo diesters (RCO₂N?NCO₂R; R=Et [ 3 ]Cl, R=iPr [ 4 ]Cl, R=tBu [ 5 ]Cl, and R=Bn [ 6 ]Cl) and a cyclic azo diamide: 4‐phenyl‐1,2,4‐triazole‐3,5‐dione (PTAD), [ 7 ]Cl. The latter complex features two ortho‐fused ring systems and constitutes the first 3‐rhoda‐1,2‐diazabicyclo[3.3.0]octane. Preliminary evidence suggests that these complexes result from N–N coordination followed by insertion of ethylene into a [Rh]?N bond. In terms of reactivity, [ 3 ]Cl and [ 4 ]Cl successfully undergo ring‐opening using p‐toluenesulfonic acid, affording the Rh chlorides, [(TPA)Rh^III(Cl)(κ¹‐(C)‐CH₂CH₂(NCO₂R)(NHCO₂R)]OTs; [ 13 ]OTs and [ 14 ]OTs. Deprotection of [ 5 ]Cl using trifluoroacetic acid was also found to give an ethyl substituted, end‐on coordinated diazene [(TPA)Rh^III(κ²‐(C,N)‐CH₂CH₂(NH)₂‐]⁺ [ 16 ]Cl, a hitherto unreported motif. Treatment of [ 16 ]Cl with acetyl chloride resulted in the bisacetylated adduct [(TPA)Rh^III(κ²‐(C,N)‐CH₂CH₂(NAc)₂‐]⁺, [ 17 ]Cl. Treatment of [ 1 ]Cl with AcN?NAc did not give the Rh?N insertion product, but instead the N,O‐chelated complex [(TPA)Rh^I ( κ²‐(O,N)‐CH₃(CO)(NH)(N?C(CH₃)(OCH?CH₂))]Cl [ 23 ]Cl, presumably through insertion of ethylene into a [Rh]?O bond.     

Conformational studies on 2-fluoro-1,2-disubstituted ethanes by NMR spectroscopy. Influence of electronegativity on vicinal proton–proton and fluorine–proton coupling constants

The analysis of the ABKX spectra of thirteen compounds of the series RC(H-K)(F-X)C(H-A)(H-B)X gave the four vicinal proton-proton and fluorine-proton coupling constants. These coupling constants of conformationally mobile structures were used (i) to calculate the populations of the rotational states of the ? CHF? CH₂? bond, (ii) to calculate the vicinal trans proton-proton J(HH)^t and gauche and trans fluorine-proton coupling constants J(FH)^g and J(FH)^t and (iii) to give the unambiguous assignment of protons H-A and H-B. The dependence of the gauche and trans coupling constants with substituent electronegativity is explored. The results extend known correlations towards smaller electronegativity values. More quantitatively, the results and those in the literature, excluding those where deformations of torsional or bond angles occur, give a good fit of the data: a linear fit for J(HH)^t = 15.0-0.77 Σ(ΔE), an exponential fit for J(FH)^g = 15.35 exp [-0.266 Σ (ΔE)] and a linear fit for J(FH)^t = 65.75 - 7.52 Σ (ΔE), where Σ (ΔE) is the sum of the electronegativity difference between hydrogen and the six atoms or groups on the CH? CF fragment.     

Lutetium‐Methanediide‐Alkyl Complexes: Synthesis and Chemistry

The first four‐coordinate methanediide/alkyl lutetium complex (BODDI)Lu₂(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(μ₂‐CHSiMe₃)(THF)₂ (BODDI=ArNC(Me)CHCOCHC(Me)NAr, Ar=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃) ( 1 ) was synthesized by a thermolysis methodology through α‐H abstraction from a Lu–CH₂SiMe₃ group. Complex 1 reacted with equimolar 2,6‐iPrC₆H₃NH₂ and Ph₂C?O to give the corresponding lutetium bridging imido and oxo complexes (BODDI)Lu₂(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(μ₂‐N‐2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)(THF)₂ ( 2 ) and (BODDI)Lu₂(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(μ₂‐O)(THF)₂ ( 3 ). Treatment of 3 with Ph₂C?O (4 equiv) caused a rare insertion of Lu–μ₂‐O bond into the C?O group to afford a diphenylmethyl diolate complex 4 . Reaction of 1 with PhN=C?O (2 equiv) led to the migration of SiMe₃ to the amido nitrogen atom to give complex (BODDI)Lu₂(CH₂SiMe₃)₂‐μ‐{PhNC(O)CHC(O)NPh(SiMe₃)‐κ³N,O,O}(THF) ( 5 ). Reaction of 1 with tBuN?C formed an unprecedented product (BODDI)Lu₂(CH₂SiMe₃){μ₂‐[η²:η²‐tBuNC(=CH₂)SiMe₂CHC?NtBu‐κ¹N]}(tBuN?C)₂ ( 6 ) through a cascade reaction of N?C bond insertion, sequential cyclometalative γ‐(sp³)‐H activation, C?C bond formation, and rearrangement of the newly formed carbene intermediate. The possible mechanistic pathways between 1 , PhN?C?O, and tBuN?C were elucidated by DFT calculations.     

Diversification of ortho‐Fused Cycloocta‐2,5‐dien‐1‐one Cores and Eight‐ to Six‐Ring Conversion by σ Bond C−C Cleavage

Sequential treatment of 2‐C₆H₄Br(CHO) with LiC≡CR¹ (R¹=SiMe₃, tBu), nBuLi, CuBr?SMe₂ and HC≡CCHClR² [R²=Ph, 4‐CF₃Ph, 3‐CNPh, 4‐(MeO₂C)Ph] at ?50 °C leads to formation of an intermediate carbanion (Z)‐1,2‐C₆H₄{C_A(=O)C≡C_BR¹}{CH=CH(CH^?)R²} ( 4 ). Low temperatures (?50 °C) favour attack at C_B leading to kinetic formation of 6,8‐bicycles containing non‐classical C‐carbanion enolates ( 5 ). Higher temperatures (?10 °C to ambient) and electron‐deficient R² favour retro σ‐bond C?C cleavage regenerating 4 , which subsequently closes on C_A providing 6,6‐bicyclic alkoxides ( 6 ). Computational modelling (CBS‐QB3) indicated that both pathways are viable and of similar energies. Reaction of 6 with H⁺ gave 1,2‐dihydronaphthalen‐1‐ols, or under dehydrating conditions, 2‐aryl‐1‐alkynylnaphthlenes. Enolates 5 react in situ with: H₂O, D₂O, I₂, allylbromide, S₂Me₂, CO₂ and lead to the expected C ‐E derivatives (E=H, D, I, allyl, SMe, CO₂H) in 49–64 % yield directly from intermediate 5 . The parents (E=H; R¹=SiMe₃, tBu; R²=Ph) are versatile starting materials for NaBH₄ and Grignard C=O additions, desilylation (when R¹=SiMe) and oxime formation. The latter allows formation of 6,9‐bicyclics via Beckmann rearrangement. The 6,8‐ring iodides are suitable Suzuki precursors for Pd‐catalysed C?C coupling (81–87 %), whereas the carboxylic acids readily form amides under T3P® conditions (71–95 %).     

Unprecedented Reaction Pathway of Sterically Crowded Calcium Complexes: Sequential C−N Bond Cleavage Reactions Induced by C−H Bond Activations

Five bis(quinolylmethyl)‐(1H ‐indolylmethyl)amine (BQIA) compounds, that is, {(quinol‐8‐yl‐CH₂)₂NCH₂(3‐Br‐1H ‐indol‐2‐yl)} ( L¹H ) and {[(8‐R³‐quinol‐2‐yl)CH₂]₂NCH(R²)[3‐R¹‐1H ‐indol‐2‐yl]} ( L^2–5H ) ( L²H : R¹=Br, R²=H, R³=H; L³H : R¹=Br, R²=H, R³=i Pr; L⁴H : R¹=H, R²=CH₃, R³=i Pr; L⁵H : R¹=H, R²=n Bu, R³=i Pr) were synthesized and used to prepare calcium complexes. The reactions of L^1–5H with silylamido calcium precursors (Ca[N(SiMe₂R)₂]₂(THF)₂, R=Me or H) at room temperature gave heteroleptic products ( L^{1, 2} )CaN(SiMe₃)₂ ( 1 , 2 ), ( L^{3, 4} )CaN(SiHMe₂)₂ ( 3 a , 4 a ) and homoleptic complexes ( L^{3, 5} )₂Ca ( D3 , D5 ). NMR and X‐ray analyses proved that these calcium complexes were stabilized through Ca⋅⋅⋅C−Si, Ca⋅⋅⋅H−Si or Ca⋅⋅⋅H−C agostic interactions. Unexpectedly, calcium complexes (( L^3–5 )CaN(SiMe₃)₂) bearing more sterically encumbered ligands of the same type were extremely unstable and underwent C−N bond cleavage processes as a consequence of intramolecular C−H bond activation, leading to the exclusive formation of (E )‐1,2‐bis(8‐isopropylquinol‐2‐yl)ethane.     

Transition‐Metal Complexes [(PMe3)2Cl2M(E)] and [(PMe3)2(CO)2M(E)] with Naked Group 14 Atoms (E=C–Sn) as Ligands; Part 1: Parent Compounds

The equilibrium geometries and bond dissociation energies of 16‐valence‐electron(VE) complexes [(PMe₃)₂Cl₂M(E)] and 18‐VE complexes [(PMe₃)₂(CO)₂M(E)] with M=Fe, Ru, Os and E=C, Si, Ge, Sn were calculated by using density functional theory at the BP86/TZ2P level. The nature of the M? E bond was analyzed with the NBO charge decomposition analysis and the EDA energy‐decomposition analysis. The theoretical results predict that the heavier Group 14 complexes [(PMe₃)₂Cl₂M(E)] and [(PMe₃)₂(CO)₂M(E)] with E=Si, Ge, Sn have C_2v equilibrium geometries in which the PMe₃ ligands are in the axial positions. The complexes have strong M? E bonds which are slightly stronger in the 16‐VE species 1ME than in the 18‐VE complexes 2ME . The calculated bond dissociation energies show that the M? E bonds become weaker in both series in the order C>Si>Ge>Sn; the bond strength increases in the order Fe<Ru<Os for 1ME , whereas a U‐shaped trend Ru<Os<Fe is found for 2ME . The M? E bonding analysis suggests that the 16‐VE complexes 1ME have two electron‐sharing bonds with σ and π symmetry and one donor–acceptor π bond like the carbon complex. Thus, the bonding situation is intermediate between a typical Fischer complex and a Schrock complex. In contrast, the 18‐VE complexes 2ME have donor–acceptor bonds, as suggested by the Dewar–Chatt–Duncanson model, with one M←E σ donor bond and two M→E π‐acceptor bonds, which are not degenerate. The shape of the frontier orbitals reveals that the HOMO?2 σ MO and the LUMO and LUMO+1 π* MOs of 1ME are very similar to the frontier orbitals of CO.     

Palladium‐MOP Chemistry: Pseudo‐cis‐Allyl MOP Complexes and Flexible Olefin Bonding. Preliminary Communication

We show that both palladium(0) and palladium(II) metal centers are capable of coordinating two monodentate MOP (=(R)‐2‐(diarylphosphino)‐1,1′‐binaphthalene) ligands in a pseudo‐cis orientation, despite published statements to the contrary. In addition to [Pd(η³‐C₃H₅)(MeO? MOP)₂]BF₄ (MeO? MOP=(R)‐2‐(diphenylphosphino)‐2′‐methoxy‐1,1′‐binaphthalene), the first examples of chiral bis κC¹‐prop‐2‐enyl (η¹‐CH₂CH?CH₂) complexes [cis‐Pd(κC¹‐C₃H₅)₂(MeO? MOP or MOP)₂], are shown to be relatively stable. Further, coordinated MOP and MeO? MOP both show stronger propensity towards novel intramolecular π‐olefin complexation than the CN? MOP analogue. The solid‐state structure of [Pd(fumaronitrile)(MOP)₂] is reported.     

Unprecedented Bonding Situation in Viable E2(NHBMe)2 (E=Be,Mg; NHBMe=(HCNMe)2B) Complexes: Neutral E2 Forms a Single E−E Covalent Bond

Is it possible to facilitate the formation of a genuine Be?Be or Mg?Mg single bond for the E₂ species while it is in its neutral state? So far, (NHC^R)Be?Be(NHC^R) (R=H, Me, Ph) have been reported where Be₂ is in ¹Δ_g excited state imposing a formal Be?Be bond order of two. Herein, we present the formation of a single E?E (E=Be, Mg) covalent bond in E₂(NHB^Me)₂ (E=Be, Mg; NHB^Me=(HCN^Me)₂B) complexes where E₂ is in ³∑_u⁺ excited state having (nσ_g⁺)²(nσ_u⁺)¹((n+1)σ_g⁺)¹ (n=2 for Be and n=4 for Mg) valence electron configuration and it forms electron‐shared bonding with two NHB^Me radicals. The effects of bonding with nσ_u⁺ and (n+1)σ_g⁺ orbitals will cancel each other, providing the former E?E bond order as one. Be₂(NHB^Me)₂ complex is thermochemically stable with respect to possible dissociation channels at room temperature, whereas the two exergonic channels, Mg₂(NHB^Me)₂ → Mg + Mg(NHB^Me)₂ and Mg₂(NHB^Me)₂ → Mg₂ + (NHB^Me)₂, are kinetically inhibited by a free energy barrier of 15.7 and 18.7 kcal mol^?1, respectively, which would likely to be further enhanced in cases of bulkier substituents attached to the NHB ligands. Therefore, the title complexes are first viable systems which feature a neutral E₂ moiety with a single E?E covalent bond.     

Unprecedented Bonding Situation in Viable E2(NHBMe)2 (E=Be,Mg; NHBMe=(HCNMe)2B) Complexes: Neutral E2 Forms a Single E−E Covalent Bond

Is it possible to facilitate the formation of a genuine Be?Be or Mg?Mg single bond for the E₂ species while it is in its neutral state? So far, (NHC^R)Be?Be(NHC^R) (R=H, Me, Ph) have been reported where Be₂ is in ¹Δ_g excited state imposing a formal Be?Be bond order of two. Herein, we present the formation of a single E?E (E=Be, Mg) covalent bond in E₂(NHB^Me)₂ (E=Be, Mg; NHB^Me=(HCN^Me)₂B) complexes where E₂ is in ³∑_u⁺ excited state having (nσ_g⁺)²(nσ_u⁺)¹((n+1)σ_g⁺)¹ (n=2 for Be and n=4 for Mg) valence electron configuration and it forms electron‐shared bonding with two NHB^Me radicals. The effects of bonding with nσ_u⁺ and (n+1)σ_g⁺ orbitals will cancel each other, providing the former E?E bond order as one. Be₂(NHB^Me)₂ complex is thermochemically stable with respect to possible dissociation channels at room temperature, whereas the two exergonic channels, Mg₂(NHB^Me)₂ → Mg + Mg(NHB^Me)₂ and Mg₂(NHB^Me)₂ → Mg₂ + (NHB^Me)₂, are kinetically inhibited by a free energy barrier of 15.7 and 18.7 kcal mol^?1, respectively, which would likely to be further enhanced in cases of bulkier substituents attached to the NHB ligands. Therefore, the title complexes are first viable systems which feature a neutral E₂ moiety with a single E?E covalent bond.     

Self‐Assembled Amphiphilic Water Oxidation Catalysts: Control of O−O Bond Formation Pathways by Different Aggregation Patterns

The oxidation of water to molecular oxygen is the key step to realize water splitting from both biological and chemical perspective. In an effort to understand how water oxidation occurs on a molecular level, a large number of molecular catalysts have been synthesized to find an easy access to higher oxidation states as well as their capacity to make O?O bond. However, most of them function in a mixture of organic solvent and water and the O?O bond formation pathway is still a subject of intense debate. Herein, we design the first amphiphilic Ru‐bda (H₂bda=2,2′‐bipyridine‐6,6′‐dicarboxylic acid) water oxidation catalysts (WOCs) of formula [Ru^II(bda)(4‐OTEG‐pyridine)₂] ( 1 , OTEG=OCH₂CH₂OCH₂CH₂OCH₃) and [Ru^II(bda)(PySO₃Na)₂] ( 2 , PySO₃^?=pyridine‐3‐sulfonate), which possess good solubility in water. Dynamic light scattering (DLS), scanning electron microscope (SEM), critical aggregation concentration (CAC) experiments and product analysis demonstrate that they enable to self‐assemble in water and form the O?O bond through different routes even though they have the same bda^2? backbone. This work illustrates for the first time that the O?O bond formation pathway can be regulated by the interaction of ancillary ligands at supramolecular level.     

Thermotropic Liquid Crystals Based on Extended 2,5‐Disubstituted‐1,3,4‐Oxadiazoles: Structure–Property Relationships,Variable‐Temperature Powder X‐ray Diffraction,and Small‐Angle X‐ray Scattering Studies

A class of extended 2,5‐disubstituted‐1,3,4‐oxadiazoles R¹‐C₆H₄‐{OC₂N₂}‐C₆H₄‐R² (R¹=R²=C₁₀H₂₁O 1 a , p‐C₁₀H₂₁O‐C₆H₄‐C?C 3 a , p‐CH₃O‐C₆H₄‐C?C 3 b ; R¹=C₁₀H₂₁O, R²=CH₃O 1 b , (CH₃)₂N 1 c ; F 1 d ; R¹=C₁₀H₂₁O‐C₆H₄‐C?C, R²=C₁₀H₂₁O 2 a , CH₃O 2 b , (CH₃)₂N 2 c , F 2 d ) were prepared, and their liquid‐crystalline properties were examined. In CH₂Cl₂ solution, these compounds displayed a room‐temperature emission with λ_max at 340–471 nm and quantum yields of 0.73–0.97. Compounds 1 d , 2 a – 2 d , and 3 a exhibited various thermotropic mesophases (monotropic, enantiotropic nematic/smectic), which were examined by polarized‐light optical microscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. Structure determination by a direct‐space approach using simulated annealing or parallel tempering of the powder X‐ray diffraction data revealed distinctive crystal‐packing arrangements for mesogenic molecules 2 b and 3 a , leading to different nematic mesophase behavior, with 2 b being monotropic and 3 a enantiotropic in the narrow temperature range of 200–210 °C. The structural transitions associated with these crystalline solids and their mesophases were studied by variable‐temperature X‐ray diffractometry. Nondestructive phase transitions (crystal‐to‐crystal, crystal‐to‐mesophase, mesophase‐to‐liquid) were observed in the diffractograms of 1 b, 1 d , 2 b, 2 d , and 3 a measured at 25–200 °C. Powder X‐ray diffraction and small‐angle X‐ray scattering data revealed that the structure of the annealed solid residue 2 b reverted to its original crystal/molecular packing when the isotropic liquid was cooled to room temperature. Structure–property relationships within these mesomorphic solids are discussed in the context of their molecular structures and intermolecular interactions.     

Nonmerohedrally twinned 6‐amino‐3‐methyluracil‐5‐carbaldehyde: a hydrogen‐bonded ribbon containing four types of ring

In the title compound [systematic name: 6‐amino‐5‐formyl‐3‐methylpyrimidine‐2,4(1H,3H)‐dione], C₆H₇N₃O₃, the intramolecular dimensions provide evidence for some polarization of the electronic structure. There is an intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond; this and a combination of three intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds generate an almost planar ribbon containing S(6), R₂²(4), R₂¹(6) and R₄⁴(16) rings. These ribbons are linked into sheets by a dipolar carbonyl–carbonyl interaction. The structure was refined as a nonmerohedral twin, with twin fractions 0.7924 (1) and 0.2076 (10).     

An oxo‐bridged centrosymmetric tetranuclear titanium compound

The title compound, octa‐tert‐butoxybis­[μ₃‐2,2′‐(N‐methyl­imino)­diethanolato]­di‐μ‐oxo‐tetratitanium(IV), [Ti₂O{(OCH₂CH₂)₂(NCH₃)}{(CH₃)₃CO}₄]₂ or [Ti₄(C₅H₁₁NO₂)₂(C₄H₉O)₈O₂], lies about an inversion centre, and displays the less usual zigzag configuration. One O atom of the N‐methyl­diethoxo­amine ligand bridges the symmetry‐related Ti atoms, while the other bridges the two independent Ti atoms, with the N atom binding to give a facial configuration. Four ^tBuO⁻ ligands and a bridging oxide complete the respective five‐ and sixfold coordination of the two Ti atoms. The Ti—O bond lengths range in a self‐consistent fashion from 1.7624 (17) to 2.0878 (18) Å, while the Ti—N bond length is 2.374 (2) Å.     

Highly active titanium(IV) dichloride FI catalysts bearing a diallylamino group for the synthesis of disentangled UHMWPE

A family of 16 salicylaldarylimine titanium(IV) dichloride complexes bearing diallylamino group, namely {2‐[3‐ or 4‐(CH₂?CH? CH₂)₂NC₆H₄N?CH]‐6‐R¹‐4‐R²‐C₆H₂O}₂TiCl₂ (R¹ = t‐Bu, CMe₂(Ph); R² = H, Me, OMe, t‐Bu) have been used for polymerization of ethylene in the presence of methylaluminoxane. The effects of reaction conditions on the polymerization were examined in detail. All the pre‐catalyst are highly active (up to 14.0 × 10⁶ g_(PE) mol_(Ti)^{?1 ?1} h^?1) for ethylene polymerization at 30°С to 60°С with the activities and MM correlating with the R¹‐substituent type and position of NAll₂‐group: CMe₂(Ph) > t‐Bu and meta‐NAll₂ > para‐NAll₂ for any R². Highly linear polyethylenes (T_m's as high as 141.0°С) can be obtained with high molecular weights in the range 0.70 to 4.10 × 10⁶ g mol^?1 with disentangled morphology, suitable for technologically more advanced and greeny way to produce high‐modulus high‐strength fibers of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene via solid‐state (solvent‐free) deformation processing.     

First [4+2] Cycloadditions Involving the Olefinic Bond of an ‘Aldoketeniminium Salt’ (=N‐Alk‐1‐enylideneaminium Salt)

‘Keteniminium triflates’ (=N‐alk‐1‐enylideneaminium trifluoromethanesulfonates; [MeN(Ts)CHC NR¹(R²)]⁺TfO⁻) generated in situ from N^α‐tosylsarcosinamides MeN(Ts)CH₂CONR¹(R²) unexpectedly react with cyclopenta‐1,3‐diene and cyclohexa‐1,3‐diene to give Diels–Alder reactions across the CC bond of the cumulene. The use of N^α‐tosylsarcosinamides derived from chiral pyrrolidines allows the direct preparation of trinorbornenone derivative 6 in high enantiomer purity.     

Chiral (1,2)‐Diphenylethylene‐Salen Complexes of Triel Metals: Coordination Patterns and Mechanistic Considerations in the Isoselective ROP of Lactide

The synthesis of enantiomerically pure aluminium, gallium and indium complexes supported by chiral (R,R)‐(^HHONNO^HH) ( 1 ), (R,R)‐(^MeHONNO^HMe) ( 2 ), (R,R)‐(^tButBuONNO^tButBu) ( 3 ), (R,R)‐(^MeNO2ONNO^MeNO2) ( 4 ), (R,R)‐(^HOMeONNO^HOMe) ( 5 ) and (R,R)‐(^ClClONNO^ClCl) ( 6 ) (1,2)‐diphenylethylene‐salen ligands is described. Several of these complexes have been crystallographically authenticated, which highlights a diversity of coordination patterns. Whereas all Ga complexes form [Ga₂(CH₂SiMe₃)₄(ONNO)] bimetallic species (ONNO= 1 – 3 ), aluminium [AlR(ONNO)] (R=Me, CH₂SiMe₃) and indium [In(CH₂SiMe₃)(ONNO)] derivatives are monometallic for ONNO= 1 , 2 and 4 – 6 , and only form the bimetallic complexes [Al₂R₄(ONNO)] and [In₂(CH₂SiMe₃)₄(ONNO)] for the most sterically crowded ligand 3 . The [AlMe(ONNO)] complexes react with iPrOH to give [AlOiPr(ONNO)] complexes that are robust towards further iPrOH. The [In(CH₂SiMe₃)(ONNO)] congeners are inert towards excess alcohol, whereas the Ga compounds decompose easily. All these alkyl complexes, as well as the [AlOiPr(ONNO)] derivatives, catalyse the ring‐opening polymerisation (ROP) of racemic lactide (rac‐LA). The [AlMe(ONNO)] complexes require additional alcohol to afford controlled reactions, but [AlOiPr(ONNO)] complexes are single‐component catalysts for the isoselective ROP of rac‐LA, with values of P_m in the range 0.80–0.90. Experimental evidence unexpectedly shows that chain‐end control leads to the isoselectivity of these aluminium catalysts; also, the more crowded the coordination sphere, the higher the isoselectivity. The bimetallic Ga complexes do not afford controlled reactions, but the binary [In(ONNO)(CH₂SiMe₃)/(PhCH₂OH)] systems competently mediate non‐stereoselective ROP; evidence is given that an activated monomer mechanism is at work. Kinetic studies show that catalytic activity decreases when electronic density and steric congestion at the metal atom increase.     

Easily available niobium(V) mixed chloro‐alkoxide complexes as catalytic precursors for ethylene polymerization

The dinuclear [NbCl_n(OR)_(5‐n)]₂ (n = 4, R = Et, 1 ; n = 4, R = CH₂Ph, 2 ; n = 3, R = Et, 3 ; n = 2, R = Et, 4 ; n = 2, R = , 5 ), and [Nb(OEt)₅]₂, 6 , and the mononuclear niobium compounds NbCl₄[κ²? OCH₂CH(R′)OR] (R = Me, R′ = H, 7 ; R = Et, R′ = H, 8 ; R = CH₂Cl, R′ = H, 9 ; R = CH₂CH₂OMe, R′ = H, 10 ; R = R′ = Me, 11 ), NbBr₄[κ²? OCH₂CH₂OMe], 12 , and NbCl₃(κ²? OCH₂CH₂OMe)(κ¹? OCH₂CH₂OMe), 13 , were tested in ethylene polymerization. Optimized reaction conditions included the use of D‐MAO as co‐catalyst and chlorobenzene as solvent at 50 °C. Complex 7 , whose X‐Ray structure is described here for the first time, exhibited the highest activity ever reported for a niobium catalyst in alkene polymerization [151 kg_polymer × mol_Nb^?1 × h^?1 × bar^?1]. Compounds 1 , 3‐5 , 8 , 13 showed activities similar to that of 7 . Linear polyethylenes (characterized by FT‐IR, NMR, GPC, and DSC analyses) with a broad polydispersivity were obtained. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2011     

Synthesis of novel zirconium complexes bearing mono‐Cp and tridentate Schiff base [ONO] ligands and their catalytic activities for olefin polymerization

A series of novel zirconium complexes {R²Cp[2‐R¹‐6‐(2‐CH₃OC₆H₄N?CH)C₆H₃O]ZrCl₂ ( 1 , R¹ = H, R² = H, 2 : R¹ = CH₃, R² = H; 3 , R¹ = ^tBu, R² = H; 4 , R¹ = H, R² = CH₃; 5 , R¹ = H, R² = n‐Bu)} bearing mono‐Cp and tridentate Schiff base [ONO] ligands are prepared by the reaction of corresponding lithium salt of Schiff base ligands with R²CpZrCl₃·DME. All complexes were well characterized by ¹H NMR, MS, IR and elemental analysis. The molecular structure of complex 1 was further confirmed by X‐ray diffraction study, where the bond angle of Cl? Zr? Cl is extremely wide [151.71(3)°]. A nine‐membered zirconoxacycle complex Cp(O? 2? C₆H₄N?CHC₆H₄‐2? O)ZrCl₂ ( 6 ) can be obtained by an intramolecular elimination of CH₃Cl from complex 1 or by the reaction of CpZrCl₃·DME with dilithium salt of ligand. When activated by excess methylaluminoxane (MAO), complexes 1–6 exhibit high catalytic activities for ethylene polymerization. The influence of polymerization temperature on the activities of ethylene polymerization is investigated, and these complexes show high thermal stability. Complex 6 is also active for the copolymerization of ethylene and 1‐hexene with low 1‐hexene incorporation ability (1.10%). Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.