A Novel Bat‐Shaped Dicyanomethylene‐4H‐pyran‐Functionalized Naphthalimide for Highly Efficient Solution‐Processed Multilevel Memory Devices

Small‐molecule‐based multilevel memory devices have attracted increasing attention because of their advantages, such as super‐high storage density, fast reading speed, light weight, low energy consumption, and shock resistance. However, the fabrication of small‐molecule‐based devices always requires expensive vacuum‐deposition techniques or high temperatures for spin‐coating. Herein, through rational tailoring of a previous molecule, DPCNCANA (4,4′‐(6,6′‐bis(2‐octyl‐1,3‐dioxo‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐benzo[de]isoquinolin‐6‐yl)‐9H,9′H‐[3,3′‐bicarbazole]‐9,9′‐diyl)dibenzonitrile), a novel bat‐shaped A‐D‐A‐type (A‐D‐A=acceptor–donor–acceptor) symmetric framework has been successfully synthesized and can be dissolved in common solvents at room temperature. Additionally, it has a low‐energy bandgap and dense intramolecular stacking in the film state. The solution‐processed memory devices exhibited high‐performance nonvolatile multilevel data‐storage properties with low switching threshold voltages of about −1.3 and −2.7 V, which is beneficial for low power consumption. Our result should prompt the study of highly efficient solution‐processed multilevel memory devices in the field of organic electronics.     

Pyrene‐Anderson‐Modified CNTs as Anode Materials for Lithium‐Ion Batteries

An organo‐functionalized polyoxometalate (POM)–pyrene hybrid (Py‐Anderson) has been used for noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) to give a Py‐Anderson‐CNT nanocomposite through π–π interactions. The as‐synthesized nanocomposite was used as the anode material for lithium‐ion batteries, and shows higher discharge capacities and better rate capacity and cycling stability than the individual components. When the current density was 0.5 mA cm^?2, the nanocomposite exhibited an initial discharge capacity of 1898.5 mA h g^?1 and a high discharge capacity of 665.3 mA h g^?1 for up to 100 cycles. AC impedance spectroscopy provides insight into the electrochemical properties and the charge‐transfer mechanism of the Py‐Anderson‐CNTs electrode.     

Cover Picture: Trimeric Perfluoro‐ortho‐phenylenemercury: A Versatile Lewis Acidic Host (Chem. Eur. J. 21/2003)

The cover picture shows how trimeric perfluoro‐ortho‐phenylene mercury (center), one of the simplest trifunctional Lewis acidic hosts, interacts with organic molecules to afford various adducts. The planarity of this trinuclear complex as well as its overall polarizability compounded with relativistic effects at mercury permits the occurrence of noncovalent interactions and accounts for the tendency of this compound to form cofacial dimers as observed in the structure of the acetone adduct (top left). With a triply coordinated acetone molecule, the structure of this adduct also substantiates the cooperative effects that arise from the proximity and accessibility of the mercury centers. The complexation of arenes, such as benzene (bottom left) and naphthalene (bottom right), also occurs and leads to the formation of binary stacks in which the arene establishes multiple linkages with the mercury centers of the trifunctional Lewis acids. In addition to displaying unusual coordination environment, the arene units present in those stacks exhibit remarkable phosphorescent properties. For more details, see the paper by F. P. Gabbaï, R. E. Taylor, and M. R. Haneline on p. 5188 ff.     

Intermolecular Interactions in Weak Donor–Acceptor Complexes from Symmetry‐Adapted Perturbation and Coupled‐Cluster Theory: Tetracyanoethylene–Benzene and Tetracyanoethylene–p‐Xylene

The interactions in the complexes of tetracyanothylene (TCNE) with benzene and p‐xylene, often classified as weak electron donor–acceptor (EDA) complexes, are investigated by a range of quantum chemical methods including intermolecular perturbation theory at the DFT‐SAPT (symmetry‐adapted perturbation theory combined with density functional theory) level and explicitly correlated coupled‐cluster theory at the CCSD(T)‐F12 level. The DFT‐SAPT interaction energies for TCNE–benzene and TCNE–p‐xylene are estimated to be ?35.7 and ?44.9 kJ mol^?1, respectively, at the complete basis set limit. The best estimates for the CCSD(T) interaction energy are ?37.5 and ?46.0 kJ mol^?1, respectively. It is shown that the second‐order dispersion term provides the most important attractive contribution to the interaction energy, followed by the first‐order electrostatic term. The sum of second‐ and higher‐order induction and exchange–induction energies is found to provide nearly 40 % of the total interaction energy. After addition of vibrational, rigid‐rotor, and translational contributions, the computed internal energy changes on complex formation approach results from gas‐phase spectrophotometry at elevated temperatures within experimental uncertainties, while the corresponding entropy changes differ substantially.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of [Pb(trz)(tfpb)(H2O)]: a Lead(II) Complex Containing 2,4,6‐Tris(2‐pyridyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine and 4,4,4‐Trifluoro‐1‐phenyl‐1,3‐butandionate

[Pb(trz)(tfpb)(H₂O)] ( 1 ) (trz and tfpb are the abbreviations of 2,4,6‐tris(2‐pyridyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine and 4,4,4‐trifluoro‐1‐phenyl‐1,3‐butandionate, respectively) have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis and IR, ¹H NMR, spectroscopy. The single‐crystal structure of 1 shows the coordination number of the Pb²⁺ ions is eight with three N‐donor atoms from a “trz” ligand and four O‐donors from the dionate ligand and one molecule of water. The supramolecular features in this complex are guided by lone pair activity and control of strong hydrogen bonds, weak directional intermolecular interactions and aromatic π‐π stacking interactions.     

Reversible Luminescent Switching in an Organic Cocrystal: Multi‐Stimuli‐Induced Crystal‐to‐Crystal Phase Transformation

A luminescent cocrystal system is reported to undergo crystal‐to‐crystal phase transformation from yellow‐emitting polymorph I to green‐emitting polymorph II, triggered by THF fuming or heating, and the green emission can recover to the initial yellow emission by grinding. The established spectroscopic and crystallographic analyses demonstrate that the phase transition occurred and benefits from the combined effect of similar molecular arrange sequence and unique alteration of intermolecular interactions from halogen/hydrogen bonds in I to π–π stacking in II. Furthermore, I and II exhibit red‐shift emission under hydrostatic pressure. The emission of I and II shows a red‐shift and recovers towards the initial emission upon acid–base fuming. This is a rare example of reversible luminescent switching of cocrystal based upon crystal‐to‐crystal phase transition, and provides an alternative strategy to develop multi‐stimuli responsive materials.     

Role of Intramolecular Aromatic π–π Interactions in the Self‐Assembly of Di‐l‐Phenylalanine Dipeptide Driven by Intermolecular Interactions: Effect of Alanine Substitution

Although the role of intermolecular aromatic π–π interactions in the self‐assembly of di‐l ‐phenylalanine (l ‐Phe‐l ‐Phe, FF), a peptide that is known for hierarchical structure, is well established, the influence of intramolecular π–π interactions on the morphology of the self‐assembled structure of FF has not been studied. Herein, the role of intramolecular aromatic π–π interactions is investigated for FF and analogous alanine (Ala)‐containing dipeptides, namely, l ‐Phe‐l ‐Ala (FA) and l ‐Ala‐l ‐Phe (AF). The results reveal that these dipeptides not only form self‐assemblies, but also exhibit remarkable differences in structural morphology. The morphological differences between FF and the analogues indicate the importance of intramolecular π–π interactions, and the structural difference between FA and AF demonstrates the crucial role of the nature of intramolecular side‐chain interactions (aromatic–aliphatic or aliphatic–aromatic), in addition to intermolecular interactions, in deciding the final morphology of the self‐assembled structure. The current results emphasise that intramolecular aromatic π–π interaction may not be essential to induce self‐assembly in smaller peptides, and π (aromatic)–alkyl or alkyl–π (aromatic) interactions may be sufficient. This work also illustrates the versatility of aromatic and a combination of aromatic and aliphatic residues in dipeptides in the formation of structurally diverse self‐assembled structures.     

A High‐Barrier Molecular Balance for Studying Face‐to‐Face Arene–Arene Interactions in the Solid State and in Solution

An atropisomeric molecular balance was developed to study face‐to‐face arene–arene interactions. The balance has a large central 1,4,5,8‐naphthalene diimide surface that forms intramolecular arene–arene interactions with two pendent arms. The balance adopts distinct syn and anti isomers with varying numbers of intramolecular interactions. Thus, the strength of the arene–arene interaction could be quantitatively measured by NMR spectroscopy from the anti/syn ratios. The size of the arene arms was easily varied, which allowed examination of the relationship between arene size and strength of the interaction. A nonlinear size dependence was observed in solution with larger arene arms having a disproportionately stronger arene–arene interaction. The intramolecular arene–arene interactions were also characterized in the solid state by X‐ray crystallography. These studies were facilitated by the kinetic stability of the syn and anti isomers at room temperature due to the high isomerization barrier (ΔG=27.0 kcal mol^?1). Thus, the anti isomer could be selectively isolated and crystallized in its folded conformation. The X‐ray structures confirmed that the anti isomers formed two strong intramolecular arene–arene interactions with face‐to‐face geometries. The solid‐state structure analysis also reveals that the rigid framework may contribute to the observed nonlinear size trend. The acetate linker is slightly too long, which selectively destabilizes the balances with smaller arene arms. The larger arene arms are able to compensate for the longer linker and form effective intramolecular arene–arene interactions.     

Interplay between Cation–π and Coinage‐Metal–Oxygen Interactions: An Ab Initio Study and Cambridge Structural Database Survey

The interplay between cation–π and coinage‐metal–oxygen interactions are investigated in the ternary systems N???PhCCM???O (N=Li⁺, Na⁺, Mg²⁺; M=Ag, Au; O=water, methanol, ethanol). A synergetic effect is observed when cation–π and coinage‐metal–oxygen interactions coexist in the same complex. The cation–π interaction in most triads has a greater enhancing effect on the coinage‐metal–oxygen interaction. This effect is analyzed in terms of the binding distance, interaction energy, and electrostatic potential in the complexes. Furthermore, the formation, strength, and nature of both the cation–π and coinage‐metal–oxygen interactions can be understood in terms of electrostatic potential and energy decomposition. In addition, experimental evidence for the coexistence of both interactions is obtained from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD).     

Self‐Assembly of Pyridinium‐Tailored Anthracene Amphiphiles into Supramolecular Hydrogels

The mixing of a polyacid cross‐linker with a pyridinium‐functionalized anthracene amphiphile afforded a supramolecular hydrogel through a self‐assembly process that was primarily driven by π‐stacking and electrostatic interactions.     

Design and synthesis of methyl 2‐{[4‐phenyl‐5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐4H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐3‐yl]sulfanyl}acetate (phpy2NS) as a ligand for complexes of Group 12 elements: structural assessment and hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular assembly analysis

The reaction of 2‐cyanopyridine with N‐phenylthiosemicarbazide afforded 2‐[amino(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]‐N‐phenylhydrazine‐1‐carbothioamide (Ham4ph) and crystals of 4‐phenyl‐5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐2,4‐dihydro‐3H‐1,2,4‐triazole‐3‐thione (pyph3NS, 1 , C₁₃H₁₀N₄S). Crystals of methyl 2‐{[4‐phenyl‐5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐4H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐3‐yl]sulfanyl}acetate (phpy2NS, 2 , C₁₆H₁₄N₄O₂S), derived from 1 , were obtained by the reaction of Ham4ph with chloroacetic acid, followed by the acid‐catalyzed esterification of the carboxylic acid with methyl alcohol. Crystals of bis(methanol‐κO)bis(methyl 2‐{[4‐phenyl‐5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐4H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐3‐yl‐κ²N¹,N⁵]sulfanyl}acetato)zinc(II)/cadmium(II) hexabromidocadmate(II), [Zn_0.76Cd_0.24(C₁₆H₁₄N₄O₂S)₂(CH₃OH)₂][Cd₂Br₆] or [Zn_0.76Cd_0.24(phpy2NS)₂(MeOH)₂][Cd₂Br₆], 3 , and dichlorido(methyl 2‐{[4‐phenyl‐5‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐4H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐3‐yl‐κ²N¹,N⁵]sulfanyl}acetato)mercury(II), [HgCl₂(C₁₆H₁₄N₄O₂S)] or [Hg(phpy2NS)Cl₂], 4 , were synthesized using ligand 2 and CdBr₂ or HgCl₂, respectively. The molecular and supramolecular structures of the compounds were studied by X‐ray diffractometry. The asymmetric unit of 3 is formed from CdBr₃ and M(phpy2NS)(MeOH) units, where the metal centre M has a 76% occupancy of Zn^II and 24% of Cd^II. The M²⁺ centre of the cation, located on a crystallographic inversion centre, is hexacoordinated and appears as a slightly distorted octahedral [MN₄O₂]²⁺ cation. The Cd centre of the anion is coordinated by two terminal bromide ligands and two bridging bromide ligands that generate [Cd₂Br₆]^2? cadmium–bromide clusters. These clusters display crystallographic inversion symmetry forming two edge‐shared tetrahedra and serve as agents that direct the structure in the formation of supramolecular assemblies. In mononuclear complex 4 , the coordination geometry around the Hg²⁺ ion is distorted tetrahedral and comprises two chloride ligands and two N‐atom donors from the phpy2NS ligand, viz. one pyridine N atom and the other from triazole. In the crystal packing, all four compounds exhibit weak intermolecular interactions, which facilitate the formation of three‐dimensional architectures. Along with the noncovalent interactions, the structural diversity in the complexes can be attributed to the metal centre and to the coordination geometry, as well as to its ionic or neutral character.     

Intra‐ and intermolecular Se...X (X = Se,O) interactions in selenium‐containing heterocycles: 3‐benzoylimino‐5‐(morpholin‐4‐yl)‐1,2,4‐diselenazole

In the selenium‐containing heterocyclic title compound {systematic name: N‐[5‐(morpholin‐4‐yl)‐3H‐1,2,4‐diselenazol‐3‐ylidene]benzamide}, C₁₃H₁₃N₃O₂Se₂, the five‐membered 1,2,4‐diselenazole ring and the amide group form a planar unit, but the phenyl ring plane is twisted by 22.12 (19)° relative to this plane. The five consecutive N—C bond lengths are all of similar lengths [1.316 (6)–1.358 (6) Å], indicating substantial delocalization along these bonds. The Se...O distance of 2.302 (3) Å, combined with a longer than usual amide C=O bond of 2.252 (5) Å, suggest a significant interaction between the amide O atom and its adjacent Se atom. An analysis of related structures containing an Se—Se...X unit (X = Se, S, O) shows a strong correlation between the Se—Se bond length and the strength of the Se...X interaction. When X = O, the strength of the Se...O interaction also correlates with the carbonyl C=O bond length. Weak intermolecular Se...Se, Se...O, C—H...O, C—H...π and π–π interactions each serve to link the molecules into ribbons or chains, with the C—H...O motif being a double helix, while the combination of all interactions generates the overall three‐dimensional supramolecular framework.