Photo‐ and Electronically Switchable Spin‐Crossover Iron(II) Metal–Organic Frameworks Based on a Tetrathiafulvalene Ligand

A major challenge is the development of multifunctional metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), wherein magnetic and electronic functionality can be controlled simultaneously. Herein, we rationally construct two 3D MOFs by introducing the redox active ligand tetra(4‐pyridyl)tetrathiafulvalene (TTF(py)₄) and spin‐crossover Fe^II centers. The materials exhibit redox activity, in addition to thermally and photo‐induced spin crossover (SCO). A crystal‐to‐crystal transformation induced by I₂ doping has also been observed and the resulting intercalated structure determined. The conductivity could be significantly enhanced (up to 3 orders of magnitude) by modulating the electronic state of the framework via oxidative doping; SCO behavior was also modified and the photo‐magnetic behavior was switched off. This work provides a new strategy to tune the spin state and conductivity of framework materials through guest‐induced redox‐state switching.     

Triazole‐Based One‐Dimensional Spin‐Crossover Coordination Polymers

One‐dimensional coordination Fe^II polymers constructed through triple N¹,N²‐1,2,4‐triazole bridges form a unique class of spin‐crossover materials, the synthetic versatility of which allows tuning the spin‐crossover properties, the design of gels, films, liquid crystals, and nanoparticles and single‐particle addressing. This Minireview provides the first complete overview of these very attractive switchable materials and their most recent developments.     

Synthesis of Spin‐Crossover Nano‐ and Micro‐objects in Homogeneous Media

New methods are proposed for the synthesis of spin‐crossover nano‐ and micro‐objects. Several nano‐objects that are based upon the spin‐crossover complex [Fe(hptrz)₃](OTs)₂ (hptrz=4‐heptyl‐1,2,4‐triazole, Ts=para‐toluenesulfonyl) were prepared in homogeneous media. The use of various reagents (Triton X‐100, PVP, TOPO, and PEGs of different molecular weights) as stabilizing agents yielded materials of different size (6 nm–2 μm) and morphology (nanorods, nanoplates, small spherical particles, and nano‐ and micro‐crystals). In particular, when Triton X‐100 was used, a variation in the morphology from nanorods to nanoplates was observed by changing the nature of the solvent. Interestingly, the preparation of the nanorods and nanoplates was always accompanied by the formation of small spherical particles. Alternatively, when PEG was used, 200–400 nm crystals of the complex were obtained. In addition, a very promising polymer‐free synthetic method is discussed that was based on the preparation of relatively stable Fe^II–triazole oligomers in CHCl₃. Their specific treatment led to micro‐crystals, small nanoparticles, or gels. The size and morphology of all of these objects were characterized by TEM and by dynamic light scattering (DLS) where possible. Their spin‐crossover behavior was studied by optical and magnetic measurements. The spin‐transition features for large particles (>100 nm) were very similar to that of the bulk material, that is, close to room temperature with a hysteresis width of up to 8 K. The effects of the matrix and/or size‐reduction led to modification of the transition temperature and an abruptness of the spin transition for oligomeric solutions and small nanoparticles of 6 nm in size.     

Photomagnetic Response in Highly Conductive Iron(II) Spin‐Crossover Complexes with TCNQ Radicals

Co‐crystallization of a cationic Fe^II complex with a partially charged TCNQ^.δ? (7,7′,8,8′‐tetracyanoquinodimethane) radical anion has afforded molecular materials that behave as narrow band‐gap semiconductors, [Fe(tpma)(xbim)](X)(TCNQ)_1.5?DMF (X=ClO₄^? or BF₄^?; tpma=tris(2‐pyridylmethyl)amine, xbim=1,1′‐(α,α′‐o‐xylyl)‐2,2′‐bisimidazole). Remarkably, these complexes also exhibit temperature‐and light‐driven spin crossover at the Fe^II center, and are thus the first structurally defined magnetically bistable semiconductors assembled with the TCNQ^.δ? radical anion. Transport measurements reveal the conductivity of 0.2 S cm^?1 at 300 K, with the low activation energy of 0.11 eV.     

An Investigation of Photo‐ and Pressure‐Induced Effects in a Pair of Isostructural Two‐Dimensional Spin‐Crossover Framework Materials

Two new isostructural iron(II) spin‐crossover (SCO) framework (SCOF) materials of the type [Fe(dpms)₂(NCX)₂] (dpms=4,4′‐dipyridylmethyl sulfide; X=S ( SCOF‐6(S) ), X=Se ( SCOF‐6(Se) )) have been synthesized. The 2D framework materials consist of undulating and interpenetrated rhomboid (4,4) nets. SCOF‐6(S) displays an incomplete SCO transition with only approximately 30 % conversion of high‐spin (HS) to low‐spin iron(II) sites over the temperature range 300–4 K (T_1/2=75 K). In contrast, the NCSe^? analogue, SCOF‐6(Se) , displays a complete SCO transition (T_1/2=135 K). Photomagnetic characterizations reveal quantitative light‐ induced excited spin‐state trapping (LIESST) of metastable HS iron(II) sites at 10 K. The temperature at which the photoinduced stored information is erased is 58 and 50 K for SCOF‐6(S) and SCOF‐6(Se) , respectively. Variable‐pressure magnetic measurements were performed on SCOF‐6(S) , revealing that with increasing pressure both the T_1/2 value and the extent of spin conversion are increased; with pressures exceeding 5.2 kbar a complete thermal transition is achieved. This study confirms that kinetic trapping effects are responsible for hindering a complete thermally induced spin transition in SCOF‐6(S) at ambient pressure due to an interplay between close T_1/2 and T(LIESST) values.     

[Fe(TPT)2/3{MI(CN)2}2]⋅nSolv (MI=Ag,Au): New Bimetallic Porous Coordination Polymers with Spin‐Crossover Properties

Two new heterobimetallic porous coordination polymers with the formula [Fe(TPT)_2/3{M^I(CN)₂}₂] ? nSolv (TPT=[(2,4,6‐tris(4‐pyridyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine]; M^I=Ag (nSolv=0, 1 MeOH, 2 CH₂Cl₂), Au (nSolv=0, 2 CH₂Cl₂)) have been synthesized and their crystal structures were determined at 120 K and 293 K by single‐crystal X‐ray analysis. These structures crystallized in the trigonal R‐3m space group. The Fe^II ion resides at an inversion centre that defines a [FeN₆] coordination core. Four dicyanometallate groups coordinate at the equatorial positions, whilst the axial positions are occupied by the TPT ligand. Each TPT ligand is centred in a ternary axis and bridges three crystallographically equivalent Fe^II ions, whilst each dicyanometallate group bridges two crystallographically equivalent Fe^II ions that define a 3D network with the topology of NbO. There are two such networks, which interpenetrate each other, thereby giving rise to large spaces in which very labile solvent molecules are included (CH₂Cl₂ or MeOH). Crystallographic analysis confirmed the reversible structural changes that were associated with the occurrence of spin‐crossover behaviour at the Fe^II ions, the most significant structural variation being the change in unit‐cell volume (about 59 ų per Fe^II ion). The spin‐crossover behaviour has been monitored by means of thermal dependence of the magnetic properties, Mössbauer spectroscopy, and calorimetry.     

Direct Observation of Ordered High‐Spin–Low‐Spin Intermediate States of an Iron(III) Three‐Step Spin‐Crossover Complex

A neutral mononuclear Fe^III complex [Fe^III(H‐5‐Br‐thsa‐Me)(5‐Br‐thsa‐Me)]?H₂O ( 1 ; H₂‐5‐Br‐thsa‐Me=5‐bromosalicylaldehyde methylthiosemicarbazone) was prepared that exhibited a three‐step spin‐crossover (SCO) with symmetry breaking and a 14 K hysteresis loop owing to strong cooperativity. Two ordered intermediate states of 1 were observed, 4HS–2LS and 2HS–4LS, which exhibited reentrant phase‐transition behavior. This study provides a new platform for examining multistability in SCO complexes.     

A Spin‐Crossover Cluster of Iron(II) Exhibiting a Mixed‐Spin Structure and Synergy between Spin Transition and Magnetic Interaction

How low can you go? An Fe^II₄ square was prepared by self‐assembly and exhibits both thermally induced and photoinduced spin crossover from a system with four high‐spin (HS) centers to one with two high‐spin and two low‐spin (LS) centers. The spin‐crossover sites are located on the same side of the square, and the spin transition and magnetic interactions (see picture) are synergistically coupled.

     

Guest Modulation of Spin‐Crossover Transition Temperature in a Porous Iron(II) Metal–Organic Framework: Experimental and Periodic DFT Studies

The synthesis, structure, and magnetic properties of three clathrate derivatives of the spin‐crossover porous coordination polymer {Fe(pyrazine)[Pt(CN)₄]} ( 1 ) with five‐membered aromatic molecules furan, pyrrole, and thiophene is reported. The three derivatives have a cooperative spin‐crossover transition with hysteresis loops 14–29 K wide and average critical temperatures T_c=201 K ( 1?fur ), 167 K ( 1?pyr ), and 114.6 K ( 1?thio ) well below that of the parent compound 1 (T_c=295 K), confirming stabilization of the HS state. The transition is complete and takes place in two steps for 1?fur , while 1?pyr and 1?thio show 50 % spin transition. For 1?fur the transformation between the HS and IS (middle of the plateau) phases occurs concomitantly with a crystallographic phase transition between the tetragonal space groups P4/mmm and I4/mmm, respectively. The latter space group is retained in the subsequent transformation involving the IS and the LS phases. 1?pyr and 1?thio display the tetragonal P4/mmm and orthorhombic Fmmm space groups, respectively, in both HS and IM phases. Periodic calculations using density functional methods for 1?fur , 1?pyr , 1?thio , and previously reported derivatives 1?CS₂ , 1?I, 1?bz (benzene), and 1?pz (pyrazine) have been carried out to investigate the electronic structure and nature of the host–guest interactions as well as their relationship with the changes in the LS–HS transition temperatures of 1?Guest . Geometry‐optimized lattice parameters and bond distances in the empty host 1 and 1?Guest clathrates are in general agreement with the X‐ray diffraction data. The concordance between the theoretical results and the experimental data also comprises the guest molecule orientation inside the host and intermolecular distances. Furthermore, a general correlation between experimental T_c and calculated LS–HS electronic energy gap was observed. Finally, specific host–guest interactions were studied through interaction energy calculations and crystal orbital displacement (COD) curve analysis.     

Electronic Structure Modulation in an Exceptionally Stable Non‐Heme Nitrosyl Iron(II) Spin‐Crossover Complex

The highly stable nitrosyl iron(II) mononuclear complex [Fe(bztpen)(NO)](PF₆)₂ (bztpen=N‐benzyl‐N,N′,N′‐tris(2‐pyridylmethyl)ethylenediamine) displays an S=1/2?S=3/2 spin crossover (SCO) behavior (T_1/2=370 K, ΔH=12.48 kJ mol^?1, ΔS=33 J K^?1 mol^?1) stemming from strong magnetic coupling between the NO radical (S=1/2) and thermally interconverted (S=0?S=2) ferrous spin states. The crystal structure of this robust complex has been investigated in the temperature range 120–420 K affording a detailed picture of how the electronic distribution of the t_2g–e_g orbitals modulates the structure of the {FeNO}⁷ bond, providing valuable magneto–structural and spectroscopic correlations and DFT analysis.     

Nanoporosity,Inclusion Chemistry,and Spin Crossover in Orthogonally Interlocked Two‐Dimensional Metal–Organic Frameworks

[Fe(tvp)₂(NCS)₂] ( 1 ) (tvp=trans‐(4,4′‐vinylenedipyridine)) consists of two independent perpendicular stacks of mutually interpenetrated two‐dimensional grids. This uncommon supramolecular conformation defines square‐sectional nanochannels (diagonal≈2.2 nm) in which inclusion molecules are located. The guest‐loaded framework 1@guest displays complete thermal spin‐crossover (SCO) behavior with the characteristic temperature T_1/2 dependent on the guest molecule, whereas the guest‐free species 1 is paramagnetic whatever the temperature. For the benzene–guest derivatives, the characteristic SCO temperature T_1/2 decreases as the Hammet σ_p parameter increases. In general, the 1@guest series shows large entropy variations associated with the SCO and conformational changes of the interpenetrated grids that leads to a crystallographic‐phase transition when the guest is benzonitrile or acetonitrile/H₂O.     

Tuning the Spin‐Crossover Behaviour of a Hydrogen‐Accepting Porous Coordination Polymer by Hydrogen‐Donating Guests

A Hoffman‐like coordination polymer with appreciable porosity and uncoordinated pyridyl groups, namely, [Fe(2,5‐bpp){Au(CN)₂}₂] ? x Solv (2,5‐bpp=2,5‐bis(pyrid‐4‐yl)pyridine; Solv=solvent), was synthesised and characterised. A series of fascinating spin‐crossover behaviours with abrupt, stepwise and hysteretic features were obtained by exchange with a range of protic solvents (ethanol, n‐propanol, isopropyl alcohol, sec‐butanol and isobutanol). Guest–host hydrogen‐bonding interactions involving the H‐accepting site of the framework are primarily responsible for the pronounced cooperativity of these spin‐crossover behaviours. Meanwhile, the tunable critical temperatures over a range of about 130 K are presumably attributable to a certain degree of competition between internal pressure and local electronic influences of solvents.     

Iron(II) Spin‐Crossover Complexes in Ultrathin Films: Electronic Structure and Spin‐State Switching by Visible and Vacuum‐UV Light

The electronic structure of the iron(II) spin crossover complex [Fe(H₂bpz)₂(phen)] deposited as an ultrathin film on Au(111) is determined by means of UV‐photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) in the high‐spin and in the low‐spin state. This also allows monitoring the thermal as well as photoinduced spin transition in this system. Moreover, the complex is excited to the metastable high‐spin state by irradiation with vacuum‐UV light. Relaxation rates after photoexcitation are determined as a function of temperature. They exhibit a transition from thermally activated to tunneling behavior and are two orders of magnitude higher than in the bulk material.