Cationic versus neutral Ru(II)--N-heterocyclic carbene complexes as latent precatalysts for the UV-induced ring-opening metathesis polymerization

A series of cationic and neutral Ru^II complexes of the general formula [Ru(L)(X) (tBuCN)₄]⁺X^? and [Ru(L)(X)₂(tBuCN)₃)], that is, [Ru(CF₃SO₃){NCC(CH₃)₃}₄(IMesH₂)]⁺[CF₃SO₃]^? ( 1 ), [Ru(CF₃SO₃){NCC(CH₃)₃}₄(IMes)]⁺[CF₃SO₃]^? ( 2 ), [RuCl{NCC(CH₃)₃}₄(IMes)]⁺Cl^? ( 3 ), [RuCl{NCC(CH₃)₃}₄(IMesH₂)⁺Cl^?]/[RuCl₂{NCC(CH₃)₃}₃(IMesH₂)] ( 4 ), and [Ru(NCO)₂{NCC(CH₃)₃}₃(IMesH₂)] ( 5 ) (IMes=1,3‐dimesitylimidazol‐2‐ylidene, IMesH₂=1,3‐dimesityl‐imidazolin‐2‐ylidene) have been synthesized and used as UV‐triggered precatalysts for the ring‐opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of different norborn‐2‐ene‐ and cis‐cyclooctene‐based monomers. The absorption maxima of complexes 1 – 5 were in the range of 245–255 nm and thus perfectly fit the emission band of the 254 nm UV source that was used for activation. Only the cationic Ru^II‐complexes based on ligands capable of forming μ²‐complexes such as 1 and 2 were found to be truly photolatent in ROMP. In contrast, complexes 3 – 5 could be activated by UV light; however, they also showed a low but significant ROMP activity in the absence of UV light. As evidenced by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, the structure of the polymers obtained with either 1 or 2 are similar to those found in the corresponding polymers prepared by the action of [Ru(CF₃SO₃)₂(IMesH₂)(CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)‐C₆H₄)], which strongly suggest the formation of Ru‐based Grubbs‐type initiators in the course of the UV‐based activation process. Precatalysts that have the IMesH₂ ligand showed significantly enhanced reactivity as compared with those based on the IMes ligand, which is in accordance with reports on the superior reactivity of IMesH₂‐based Grubbs‐type catalysts compared with IMes‐based systems.     

Reaction of the N‐heterocyclic carbene, 1,3‐dimesityl‐ imidazol‐2‐ylidene,with a uranyl triflate complex,UO2(OTf)2(thf)3

The N‐heterocyclic carbene, 1,3‐dimesityl‐imidazol‐2‐ylidene (IMes) reacts with tetrahydrofuran (THF) in the presence of an oxidizing uranyl triflate complex, UO₂(OTf)₂(thf)₃ (^?OTf = ^?OSO₂CF₃), to give 1,4‐bis(1,3‐dimesityl‐2‐imidazolium)‐1,3‐butadiene bis(trifluoromethanesulfonate), formally understood as the coupling product of two equivalents of IMes with [CH?CH? CH?CH](OTf)₂. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Heterogenization of a Modified Grubbs–Hoveyda Catalyst on a ROMP‐Derived Monolithic Support

A ring‐opening metathesis polymerization‐ (ROMP‐) based monolith was synthesized using a Grubbs' first generation catalyst. The living termini were used for surface grafting of norborn‐5‐ene‐2‐ylmethyl hexafluoroglutarate. The free carboxylic acid groups of the graft polymer were converted into the corresponding silver salt and reacted with the Grubbs–Hoveyda catalyst [RuCl₂(CH (2‐iPrO )C₆H₄)(IMesH₂)] (IMesH₂ = 1,3‐bis(2,4,6‐trimethylphenyl)‐4,5‐dihydroimidazol‐2‐ylidene) to yield a stable heterogeneous version of this catalyst for use in ring‐closing metathesis (RCM) under continuous flow conditions.

The monolith‐supported Grubbs–Hoveyda catalyst.     

A Dicationic Ruthenium Alkylidene Complex for Continuous Biphasic Metathesis Using Monolith‐Supported Ionic Liquids

A dicationic ruthenium–alkylidene complex [Ru(dmf)₃(IMesH₂)(?CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)‐C₆H₄)][(BF₄)₂] ( 1 ; IMesH₂=1,3‐dimesitylimidazolin‐2‐ylidene) has been prepared and used in continuous metathesis reactions by exploiting supported ionic‐liquid phase (SILP) technology. For these purposes, ring‐opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP)‐derived monoliths were prepared from norborn‐2‐ene, tris(norborn‐5‐ene‐2‐ylmethyloxy)methylsilane, and [RuCl₂(PCy₃)₂(CHPh)] (Cy=cyclohexyl) in the presence of 2‐propanol and toluene and surface grafted with norborn‐5‐en‐2‐ylmethyl‐N,N,N‐trimethylammonium tetrafluoroborate ([NBE‐CH₂‐NMe₃][BF₄]). Subsequent immobilization of the ionic liquid (IL), 1‐butyl‐2,3‐dimethylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([BDMIM][BF₄]), containing ionic catalyst 1 created the SILP catalyst. The use of a second liquid transport phase, which contained the substrate and was immiscible with the IL, allowed continuous metathesis reactions to be realized. High turnover numbers (TONs) of up to 3700 obtained in organic solvents for the ring‐closing metathesis (RCM) of, for example, N,N‐diallyltrifluoroacetamide, diethyl diallylmalonate, diethyl di(methallyl)malonate, tert‐butyl‐N,N‐diallylcarbamate, N,N‐diallylacetamide, diphenyldiallylsilane, and 1,7‐octadiene, as well as in the self‐metathesis of methyl oleate, could be further increased by using biphasic conditions with [BDMIM][BF₄]/heptane. Under continuous SILP conditions, TONs up to 900 were observed. Due to the ionic character of the initiator, catalyst leaching into the transport phase was very low (<0.1 %). Finally, the IL can, together with decomposed catalyst, be removed from the monolithic support by flushing with methanol. Upon reloading with [BDMIM][BF₄]/ 1 , the recycled support material again qualified for utilization in continuous metathesis reactions.     

Acyclic diene metathesis polymerization of 2,5‐dialkyl‐1,4‐divinylbenzene with molybdenum or ruthenium catalysts: Factors affecting the precise synthesis of defect‐free,high‐molecular‐weight trans‐poly(p‐phenylene vinylene)s

Factors affecting the syntheses of high‐molecular‐weight poly(2,5‐dialkyl‐1,4‐phenylene vinylene) by the acyclic diene metathesis polymerization of 2,5‐dialkyl‐1,4‐divinylbenzenes [alkyl = n‐octyl ( 2 ) and 2‐ethylhexyl ( 3 )] with a molybdenum or ruthenium catalyst were explored. The polymerizations of 2 by Mo(N‐2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃) (CHMe₂ Ph)[OCMe(CF₃)₂]₂ at 25 °C was completed with both a high initial monomer concentration and reduced pressure, affording poly(p‐phenylene vinylene)s with low polydispersity index values (number‐average molecular weight = 3.3–3.65 × 10³ by gel permeation chromatography vs polystyrene standards, weight‐average molecular weight/number‐average molecular weight = 1.1–1.2), but the polymerization of 3 was not completed under the same conditions. The synthesis of structurally regular (all‐trans), defect‐free, high‐molecular‐weight 2‐ethylhexyl substituted poly(p‐phenylene vinylene)s [poly 3 ; degree of monomer repeating unit (DP_n) = ca. 16–70 by ¹H NMR] with unimodal molecular weight distributions (number‐average molecular weight = 8.30–36.3 × 10³ by gel permeation chromatography, weight‐average molecular weight/number‐average molecular weight = 1.6–2.1) and with defined polymer chain ends (as a vinyl group, ? CH?CH₂) was achieved when Ru(CHPh)(Cl)₂(IMesH₂)(PCy₃) or Ru(CH‐2‐OⁱPr‐C₆H₄)(Cl)₂(IMesH₂) [IMesH₂ = 1,3‐bis(2,4,6‐trimethylphenyl)‐2‐imidazolidinylidene] was employed as a catalyst at 50 °C. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 6166–6177, 2005     

Synthesis of homopolymers and multiblock copolymers by the living ring‐opening metathesis polymerization of norbornenes containing acetyl‐protected carbohydrates with well‐defined ruthenium and molybdenum initiators

The ring‐opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of norbornenes containing acetyl‐protected glucose [2,3,4,6‐tetra‐O‐acetyl‐glucos‐1‐O‐yl 5‐norbornene‐2‐carboxylate ( 1 )] and maltose [2,3,6,2′,3′,4′,6′‐hepta‐O‐acetyl‐maltos‐1‐O‐yl 5‐norbornene‐2‐carboxylate ( 2 )] was explored in the presence of Mo(N‐2,6‐ⁱPr₂C₆H₃)(CHCMe₂Ph)(O^tBu)₂ ( A ), Ru(CHPh)(Cl)₂(PCy₃)₂ ( B ; Cy = cyclohexyl), and Ru(CHPh)(Cl)₂(IMesH₂)(PCy₃) ( C ; IMesH₂ = 1,3‐dimesityl‐4,5‐dihydromidazol‐2‐ylidene). The polymerizations promoted by B and A proceeded in a living fashion with exclusive initiation efficiency, and the resultant polymers possessed number‐average molecular weights that were very close to those calculated on the basis of the monomer/initiator molar ratios and narrow molecular weight distributions (weight‐average molecular weight/number‐average molecular weight < 1.18) in all cases. The observed catalytic activity of B was strongly dependent on both the initial monomer concentration and the solvent employed, whereas the polymerization initiated with A was completed efficiently even at low initial monomer concentrations. The polymerization with C also took place efficiently, and even the polymerization with 1000 equiv of 1 was completed within 2 h. First‐order relationships between the propagation rates and the monomer concentrations were observed for all the polymerization runs, and the estimated rate constants at 25 °C increased in the following order: A > C > B . On the basis of these results, we concluded that ROMP with A was more suitable than ROMP with B or C for the efficient and precise preparation of polymers containing carbohydrates. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 4248–4265, 2004     

Rhodium(I) and Silver(I) Complexes of 4, 5‐Dicyano‐1, 3‐dimesityl‐ and 4, 5‐Dicyano‐1, 3‐dineopentylimidazol‐2‐ylidene

The new N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) precursors 4, ‐dicyano‐1, ‐dimesityl‐ ( 9 ) and 4, 5‐dicyano‐1, 3‐dineopentyl‐2‐(pentafluorophenyl)imidazoline ( 14 ) were synthesized. The structure of 9 could be determined by X‐ray crystallography. With the 2‐pentafluorophenyl‐substituted imidazolines 9 and 14 , the [AgCl(NHC)], [RhCl(COD)(NHC)], and [RhCl(CO)₂(NHC)] complexes [NHC = 4, 5‐dicyano‐1, 3‐dimesitylimidazol‐2‐ylidene ( 3 ) and 4, 5‐dicyano‐1, 3‐dineopentylimidazol‐2‐ylidene ( 4 )] were obtained. Crystal structures of [AgCl( 3 )] ( 15 ), [RhCl(COD)( 3 )] ( 17 ), [RhCl(COD)( 4 )] ( 18 ), and [RhCl(CO)₂( 3 )] ( 19 ) were solved and with the crystal data of 19 , the percent buried volume ( %V_bur) of 31.8(±0.1) % was determined for NHC 3 . Infrared spectra of the imidazolines 9 and 14 and of the complexes 15 – 20 were recorded and the CO stretching frequencies of complexes 19 and 20 were used to determine the Tolman electronic parameters of the newly obtained NHCs 3 (TEP: 2060 cm^–1) and 4 (TEP: 2061 cm^–1), thus proving that 1, 3‐substitution of maleonitrile‐NHCs does not have a significant effect for the high π‐acceptor strength of these carbenes.     

Electronically Strongly Coupled Divinylheterocyclic‐Bridged Diruthenium Complexes

Complexes [{Ru(CO)Cl(PiPr₃)₂}₂(μ‐2,5‐(CH?CH)₂‐^cC₄H₂E] (E=NR; R=C₆H₄‐4‐NMe₂ ( 10 a ), C₆H₄‐4‐OMe ( 10 b ), C₆H₄‐4‐Me ( 10 c ), C₆H₅ ( 10 d ), C₆H₄‐4‐CO₂Et ( 10 e ), C₆H₄‐4‐NO₂ ( 10 f ), C₆H₃‐3,5‐(CF₃)₂ ( 10 g ), CH₃ ( 11 ); E=O ( 12 ), S ( 13 )) are discussed. The solid state structures of four alkynes and two complexes are reported. (Spectro)electrochemical studies show a moderate influence of the nature of the heteroatom and the electron‐donating or ‐withdrawing substituents R in 10 a – g on the electrochemical and spectroscopic properties. The CVs display two consecutive one‐electron redox events with ΔE°′=350–495 mV. A linear relationship between ΔE°′ and the σ_p Hammett constant for 10 a–f was found. IR, UV/Vis/NIR and EPR studies for 10 ⁺– 13 ⁺ confirm full charge delocalization over the {Ru}CH?CH‐heterocycle‐CH?CH{Ru} backbone, classifying them as Class III systems according to the Robin and Day classification. DFT‐optimized structures of the neutral complexes agree well with the experimental ones and provide insight into the structural consequences of stepwise oxidations.     

Synthesis,characterization, and metal complexes of polyacetylenes with pendant 2,2′‐bipyridyl groups

5‐Ethynyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine ( 1 ; bpyC≡CH) polymerized in the presence of catalytic amounts of [RhF(COD)(PPh₃)] or [Rh(μ‐OH)(COD)]₂ (COD = 1,5‐cyclooctadiene) in 74–91% yields. In contrast, [Rh(μ‐X)(NBD)]₂ (X = Cl or OMe; NBD = norbornadiene) did not catalyze the polymerization of 1 or gave low yields of the polymer. The obtained polymer, poly(5‐ethynyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine) [ 2 ; (bpyC?CH)_n], was highly stereoregular with a predominant cis–transoidal geometry. Random copolyacetylenes containing the 2,2′‐bipyridyl group with improved solubility in organic solvents were obtained by the treatment of a mixture of 1 and phenylacetylene ( 3 ) or 1‐ethynyl‐4‐n‐pentyl‐benzene with catalytic amounts of [RhF(COD)(PPh₃)]. A block copolymer of 1 and 3 was prepared by the addition of 1 to a poly(phenylacetylene) containing a living end. The reaction of 2 with [Mo(CO)₆] produced an insoluble polymer containing [Mo(CO)₄(bpy)] groups, whereas with [RuCl₂(bpy)₂] or [Ru(bpy)₂(CH₃COCH₃)₂](CF₃SO₃)₂, it gave soluble metal–polymer complexes containing [Ru(bpy)₃]²⁺ groups. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43:3167–3177, 2005     

Synthesis and single crystal X‐ray determination of the Schiff base 1‐[(2‐isopropyl‐5‐methylphenoxy)hydrazono] ethyl ferrocene

The reaction of acetylferrocene [Fe(η‐C₅H₅)(η‐C₅H₄COCH₃)] (1) with (2‐isopropyl‐5‐methylphenoxy) acetic acid hydrazide [CH₃C₆H₃CH(CH₃)₂OCH₂CONHNH₂] (2) in refluxing ethanol gives the stable light‐orange–brown Schiff base 1‐[(2‐isopropyl‐5‐methylphenoxy)hydrazono] ethyl ferrocene, [CH₃C₆H₃CH(CH₃)₂OCH₂CONHN?C(CH₃)Fe(η‐C₅H₅)(η‐C₅H₄)] (3). Complex 3 has been characterized by elemental analysis, IR, ¹H NMR and single crystal X‐ray diffraction study. It crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n, with a = 9.6965(15), b = 7.4991(12), c = 29.698(7) Å, β = 99.010(13) °, V = 2132.8(7) ų, D_calc = 1.346 Mg m^?3; absorption coefficient, 0.729 mm^?1. The crystal structure clearly shows the characteristic [N? H···O] hydrogen bonding between the two adjacent molecules of 3. This acts as a bidentale ligand, which, on treatment with [Ru(CO)₂Cl₂] _n, gives a stable bimetallic yellow–orange complex (4). Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Highly Efficient Deep‐Blue Emitters Based on cis and trans N‐Heterocyclic Carbene PtII Acetylide Complexes: Synthesis,Photophysical Properties,and Mechanistic Studies

We have synthesized cis and trans N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) platinum(II) complexes bearing σ‐alkynyl ancillary ligands, namely [Pt(dbim)₂(C?CR)₂] [DBIM=N,N′‐didodecylbenzimidazoline‐2‐ylidene; R=C₆H₄F ( 4 ), C₆H₅ ( 5 ), C₆H₂(OMe)₃ ( 6 ), C₄H₃S ( 7 ), and C₆H₄C?CC₆H₅ ( 8 )] and [Pt(ibim)₂(C?CC₆H₅)₂] ( 9 ) (ibim=N,N′‐diisopropylbenzimidazoline‐2‐ylidene), starting from [Pt(cod)(C?CR)₂] (COD=cyclooctadiene) and 2 equivalents of [dbimH]Br ([ibimH]Br for complexes 9 ) in the presence of tBuOK and THF. Mechanistic investigations aimed at uncovering the cis to trans isomerization reaction have been performed on the representative cis complex 5 a [Pt(dbim)₂(C?CC₆H₅)₂] and revealed the isomerization to progress smoothly in good yield when 5 a was treated with catalytic amounts of [Pt(cod)(C?CR)₂] at 75 °C in THF or when 5 a was heated at 200 °C in the solid state under an inert atmosphere. Detailed examination of the reactions points to the possible involvement, in a catalytic fashion, of a solvent‐stabilized Pt^II dialkyne complex in the former case and a Pt⁰ NHC complex in the latter case, for the transformation of the cis isomer to the corresponding trans complex. Thermal stability and the isomerization process in the solid state have been further investigated on the basis of TGA and DSC measurements. X‐ray diffraction studies have been carried out to confirm the solid‐state structures of 4 b , 5 a , 5 b , and 9 b . All of the synthesized dialkyne complexes 4 – 9 exhibit phosphorescence in solution, in the solid state at room temperature (RT), and also in frozen solvent glasses at 77 K. The emission wavelengths and quantum yields have been found to be highly tunable as a function of the alkynyl ligand. In particular, the trans isomer of complex 9 in a spin‐coated film (10 wt % in poly(methyl methacrylate), PMMA) exhibits a high phosphorescence quantum yield of 80 %, which is the highest reported for Pt^II‐based deep‐blue emitters. Experimental observations and time‐dependent density functional theory (TD‐DFT) calculations are strongly indicative of the emission being mainly governed by metal‐perturbed interligand (³IL) charge transfer.     

Amine Exchange and Unexpected Ring‐Opening Reactions of Pyranone Derivatives: Synthesis of 3‐Amino‐Substituted Oxonaphthopyran‐carbaldehydes and Tetrahydropyrimidinethanones as New Potential Oligonucleotide Stabilization Agents

3‐[(3‐Aminopropyl)amino]‐1‐oxo‐1H‐naphtho[2,1‐b]pyran‐2‐carbaldehyde ( 10 ) was synthesized by nucleophilic substitution reaction of 2‐(3‐dimethylamino)‐1‐oxo‐1H‐naphtho[2,1‐b]pyran‐2‐carbaldehyde ( 9 ) and the monoprotected propane‐1,3‐diamine. The reaction with the unprotected reagent led to the unexpected 1‐(2‐hydroxynaphthalen‐1‐yl)‐2‐(tetrahydropyrimidin‐2(1H)‐ylidene)ethanone ( 6 ). Extension of this reaction to chromone 16 gave 1‐(2‐hydroxy‐3‐isopropyl‐6‐methylphenyl)‐2‐(tetrahydropyrimidin‐2(1H)‐ylidene)ethanone ( 7 ). The X‐ray crystal structures of 6 and 7 were also determined.     

Interconversion of Metallabenzenes and Cyclic η2‐Allene‐Coordinated Complexes

Treatment of the osmabenzene [Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH} Cl₂(PPh₃)₂]Cl ( 1 ) with excess 8‐hydroxyquinoline produces monosubstituted osmabenzene [Os{CH C(PPh₃) CHC(PPh₃)CH}(C₉H₆NO)Cl(PPh₃)]Cl ( 2 ) or disubstituted osmabenzene [Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH} (C₉H₆NO)₂]Cl ( 3 ) under different reaction conditions. Osmabenzene 2 evolves into cyclic η²‐allene‐coordinated complex [Os{CH?C(PPh₃)CH=(η²‐C?CH₂)}(C₉H₆NO)(PPh₃)₂]Cl ( 4 ) in the presence of excess PPh₃ and NaOH, presumably involving a P? C bond cleavage of the metallacycle. Reaction of 4 with excess 8‐hydroxyquinoline under air affords the S_NAr product [(C₉H₆NO)Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHCHC} (C₉H₆NO)(PPh₃)]Cl ( 5 ). Complex 4 is fairly reactive to a nucleophile in the presence of acid, which could react with water to give carbonyl complex [Os{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?CH₂}(C₉H₆NO) (CO)(PPh₃)₂]Cl ( 6 ). Complex 4 also reacts with PPh₃ in the presence of acid and results in a transformation to [Os {CHC(PPh₃)CHCHC}(C₉H₆NO)Cl (PPh₃)₂]Cl ( 7 ) and [Os{CH?C(PPh₃) CH=(η²‐C?CH(PPh₃))}(C₉H₆NO) Cl(PPh₃)]Cl ( 8 ). Further investigation shows that the ratio of 7 and 8 is highly dependent on the amount of the acid in the reaction.     

Preparation of new 2‐amino‐ and 2,3‐diamino‐pyridine trifluoroacetyl enamine derivatives and their application to the synthesis of trifluoromethyl‐containing 3H‐pyrido[2,3‐b][1,4] diazepinols

The synthesis of a novel series of the intermediates N²(N³)‐[1‐alkyl(aryl/heteroaryl)‐3‐oxo‐4,4,4‐trifluoroalk‐1‐en‐1‐yl]‐2‐aminopyridines [F₃CC(O)CH?CR¹(2? NH?C₅H₃N)] and 2,3‐diaminopyridines [F₃CC(O)CH?CR¹(2‐NH₂‐3‐NH? C₅H₃N)], where R¹ = H, Me, C₆H₅, 4‐FC₆H₄, 4‐CIC₆H₄, 4‐BrC₆H₄, 4‐CH₃C₆H₄, 4‐OCH₃C₆H₄, 4,4′‐biphenyl, 1‐naphthyl, 2‐thienyl, 2‐furyl, is reported. The corresponding series of 2‐aryl(heteroaryl)‐4‐trifluoromethyl‐3H‐pyrido[2,3‐b][1,4]diazepin‐4‐ols obtained from intramolecular cyclization reaction of the respective trifluoroacetyl enamines or from the direct cyclocondensation reaction of 4‐methoxy‐1,1,1‐trifluoroalk‐3‐en‐2‐ones with 2,3‐diaminopyridine, under mild conditions, is also reported.     

The Influence of N‐Heterocyclic Carbenes (NHC) on the Reactivity of [Ru(NHC)4H]+ With H2, N2, CO and O2

The five‐coordinate ruthenium N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) hydrido complexes [Ru(IiPr₂Me₂)₄H][BAr^F₄] ( 1 ; IiPr₂Me₂=1,3‐diisopropyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene; Ar^F=3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃), [Ru(IEt₂Me₂)₄H][BAr^F₄] ( 2 ; IEt₂Me₂=1,3‐diethyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) and [Ru(IMe₄)₄H][BAr^F₄] ( 3 ; IMe₄=1,3,4,5‐tetramethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) have been synthesised following reaction of [Ru(PPh₃)₃HCl] with 4–8 equivalents of the free carbenes at ambient temperature. Complexes 1 – 3 have been structurally characterised and show square pyramidal geometries with apical hydride ligands. In both dichloromethane or pyridine solution, 1 and 2 display very low frequency hydride signals at about δ ?41. The tetramethyl carbene complex 3 exhibits a similar chemical shift in toluene, but shows a higher frequency signal in acetonitrile arising from the solvent adduct [Ru(IMe₄)₄(MeCN)H][BAr^F₄], 4 . The reactivity of 1 – 3 towards H₂ and N₂ depends on the size of the N‐substituent of the NHC ligand. Thus, 1 is unreactive towards both gases, 2 reacts with both H₂ and N₂ only at low temperature and incompletely, while 3 affords [Ru(IMe₄)₄(η²‐H₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 7 ) and [Ru(IMe₄)₄(N₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 8 ) in quantitative yield at room temperature. CO shows no selectivity, reacting with 1 – 3 to give [Ru(NHC)₄(CO)H][BAr^F₄] ( 9 – 11 ). Addition of O₂ to solutions of 2 and 3 leads to rapid oxidation, from which the Ru^III species [Ru(NHC)₄(OH)₂][BAr^F₄] and the Ru^IV oxo chlorido complex [Ru(IEt₂Me₂)₄(O)Cl][BAr^F₄] were isolated. DFT calculations reproduce the greater ability of 3 to bind small molecules and show relative binding strengths that follow the trend CO ? O₂ > N₂ > H₂.     

Synthesis and molecular structure of biologically significant bis(1,3‐dimesityl‐4,5‐naphthoquinoimidazol‐2‐ylidene)gold(I) complexes with chloride and dichloridoaurate counter‐ions

Diffraction‐quality single crystals of two gold(I) complexes, namely bis(1,3‐dimesityl‐4,5‐naphthoquinoimidazol‐2‐ylidene)gold(I) chloride benzene monosolvate, [Au(C₂₉H₂₆N₂O₂)₂]Cl·C₆H₆ or [(NQMes)₂Au]Cl·C₆H₆, 2 , and bis(1,3‐dimesityl‐4,5‐naphthoquinoimidazol‐2‐ylidene)gold(I) dichloridoaurate(I) dichloromethane disolvate, [Au(C₂₉H₂₆N₂O₂)₂][AuCl₂]·2CH₂Cl₂ or [(NQMes)₂Au][AuCl₂]·2CH₂Cl₂, 4 , were isolated and studied with the aid of single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. Compound 2 crystallizes in a monoclinic space group C2/c with eight molecules in the unit cell, while compound 4 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P with two molecules in the unit cell. The crystal lattice of compound 2 reveals C—H…Cl^? interactions that are present throughout the entire structure representing head‐to‐tail contacts between the aromatic (C—H) hydrogens of naphthoquinone and Cl^? counter‐ions. Compound 4 stacks with the aid of short interactions between a naphthoquinone O atom of one molecule and the mesityl methyl group of another molecule along the a axis, leading to a one‐dimensional strand that is held together by strong π–η² interactions between the imidazolium backbone and the [AuCl₂]^? counter‐ion. The bond angles defined by the Au^I atom and two carbene C atoms [C(carbene)—Au—C(carbene)] in compounds 2 and 4 are nearly rectilinear, with an average value of ～174.1 [2]°. Though 2 and 4 share the same cation, they differ in their counter‐anion, which alters the crystal lattice of the two compounds. The knowledge gleaned from these studies is expected to be useful in understanding the molecular interactions of 2 and 4 under physiological conditions.     

A New Route to Vitamin E Key‐Intermediates by Olefin Cross‐Metathesis

Ru‐Catalyzed olefin cross‐metathesis (CM) has been successfully applied to the synthesis of several phytyl derivatives ( 2b, 2d – f, 3b ) with a trisubstituted C?C bond, as useful intermediates for an alternative route to α‐tocopheryl acetate (vitamin E acetate; 1b ) (Scheme 1). Using the second‐generation Grubbs catalyst RuCl₂(C₂₁H₂₆N₂)(CHPh)PCy₃ (Cy = cyclohexyl; 4a ) and Hoveyda–Grubbs catalyst RuCl₂(C₂₁H₂₆N₂){CH‐C₆H₄(O‐ⁱPr)‐2} ( 4b ), the reactions were performed with various C‐allyl ( 5a – f, 7a,b ) and O‐allyl ( 8a – d ) derivatives of trimethylhydroquinone‐1‐acetate as substrates. 2,6,10,14‐Tetramethylpentadec‐1‐ene ( 6a ) and derivatives 6c – e of phytol ( 6b ) as well as phytal ( 6f ) were employed as olefin partners for the CM reactions (Schemes 2 and 5). The vitamin E precursors could be prepared in up to 83% isolated yield as (E/Z)‐mixtures.     

Synthesis and structural characterization of iridium(I) complexes of 20‐membered macrocyclic rings bearing chelating bis(N‐heterocyclic carbene) ligands

The reactivities of two 20‐membered macrocyclic ligands, each containing two N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) and two amine groups, towards [IrCl(COD)]₂ (COD is cycloocta‐1,5‐diene) were investigated. Macrocycles containing imidazolin‐2‐ylidene groups formed the monometallic complex [(1,2,5,6‐η)‐cycloocta‐1,5‐diene](5,16‐dibenzyl‐1,5,9,12,16,20‐hexaazatricyclo[18.2.1.1^9,12]tetracosa‐10,21‐dien‐21,22‐diylidene)iridium(I) bromide dichloromethane monosolvate, [Ir(C₈H₁₂)(C₃₂H₄₂N₆)]Br·CH₂Cl₂, 2a . The structure of iridium complex 2a at 100 K has triclinic P symmetry. The ligand in 2a coordinates to the Ir center through the NHC moieties in a cis fashion. Additionally, the ligand adopts an umbrella‐like structure that appears to envelope the Ir center. The structure displays C—H…Br interactions. Macrocycles containing benzimidazolin‐2‐ylidene groups formed the bimetallic complex [μ‐5,20‐dibenzyl‐1,5,9,16,20,24‐hexaazapentacyclo[22.6.1.1^9,16.0^10,15.0^25,30]dotriaconta‐10(15),11,13,25(30),26,28‐hexaene‐31,32‐diylidene]bis{bromido[(1,2,5,6‐η)‐cycloocta‐1,5‐diene]iridium(I)}, [Ir₂Br₂(C₈H₁₂)₂(C₄₀H₄₆N₆)], 2b . The structure of complex 2b at 100 K has orthorhombic Pbca symmetry. Each NHC moiety in 2b coordinates in a monodentate fashion to an Ir(COD) fragment. The structure exhibits disorder of the main molecule. This disorder is found in the portion of the macrocycle containing an amine group. This structure also displays C—H…Br interactions. Finally, the structure of the hexafluorophosphate salt of the imidazolin‐2‐ylidene‐containing macrocycle, namely 5,16‐dibenzyl‐1λ⁵,5,9,12λ⁵,16,20‐hexaazatricyclo[18.2.1.1^9,12]tetracosa‐1(23),10,12(24),21‐tetraene‐1,12‐diium bis(hexafluorophosphate), C₃₂H₄₄N₆²⁺·2PF₆^?, 1c , was determined. The structure of macrocycle 1c at 100 K has triclinic P symmetry and was found to contain C—H…F interactions.     

The one‐electron oxidation product of a metallocenyl‐terminated cyanine

The 1‐(2,3,4,5,1′,2′,3′,4′‐octa­methyl­ferrocen‐1‐yl)‐3‐(ruth­eno­cen­yl)­allylium cation readily undergoes one‐electron oxidation to a dication in which an octa­methyl­ferrocenium moiety is bridged by a vinyl­ene group to a [(η⁶‐fulvene)(η⁵‐cyclo­penta­dienyl)­ruthenium]⁺ moiety. In the title compound, 1‐(2,3,4,5,1′,2′,3′,4′‐octa­methyl­ferrocen‐1‐yl)‐3‐(ruth­eno­cen­ylidene)prop‐1‐enium(2+) bis­(tetra­fluoro­borate), [Fe­Ru­(C₅H₅)(C₉H₁₃)(C₁₇H₁₉)]­(BF₄)₂, the C—C bond lengths in the bridge (average for two independent mol­ecules) are, starting from the ipso octa­methyl­ferrocenium carbon and ending at the exo carbon of the coordinated fulvene, 1.455 (6), 1.344 (3) and 1.449 (8) Å, indicating a localized electronic structure.     

A ruthenium(II) complex with p‐cymene and (S)‐2‐(anilinomethyl)pyrrolidine

The title compound, [(S)‐2‐(anilino­methyl)­pyrrolidine‐N,N′]‐chloro(η⁶‐para‐cymene)­ruthenium(II) chloride, [RuCl‐(C₁₀H₁₄)(C₁₁H₁₆N₂)]Cl, has been synthesized by the reaction of [RuCl₂(p‐cymene)]₂ (p‐cymene is para‐iso­propyl­toluene) with (S)‐2‐(anilinomethyl)­pyrrolidine in triethyl­amine/2‐propanol. The Ru atom is in a pseudo‐tetrahedral environment coordinated by a chloride ligand, the aromatic hydro­carbon is linked in a η⁶ manner and the amine is linked via its two N atoms. The chloride anion is involved in hydrogen bonding with the di­amine moieties through N—H?Cl interactions, with N?Cl distances of 3.273 (4) and 3.352 (4) Å.