Chemical Etiology of Nucleic Acid Structure: The Pentulofuranosyl Oligonucleotide Systems: The (1′→3′)‐β‐L‐Ribulo, (4′→3′)‐α‐L‐Xylulo,and (1′→3′)‐α‐L‐Xylulo Nucleic Acids

Under potentially prebiotic scenarios, ribose (pentose), the component of RNA is formed in meager amounts, as opposed to ribulose and xylulose (pentuloses). Consequently, replacement of ribose in RNA, with pentulose sugars, gives rise to prospective oligonucleotide candidates that are potentially prebiotic structural variants of RNA that could be formed by the same type of chemical pathways that gave rise to RNA from ribose. The potentially natural alternative (1′→3′)‐ribulo oligonucleotides and (4′→3′)‐ and (1′→3′)‐xylulo oligonucleotides consisting of adenine and thymine were synthesized and found to exhibit no self‐pairing or cross‐pairing with RNA. This signifies that even though pentulose sugars may have been abundant in a prebiotic scenario, the pentulose nucleic acids (NAs), if and when formed, would not have been competitors of RNA, or interfered with the emergence of RNA as a functional informational system. The reason for the lack of base pairing in pentulose NA highlights the contrasting and central role played by the furanosyl ring in RNA and pentulose NA, enabling and optimizing the base pairing in RNA, while impeding it in pentulose NA.     

Pentopyranosyl Oligonucleotide Systems,Communication No. 10 , The α‐L‐Lyxopyranosyl‐(4′→2′)‐oligonucleotide System

To determine whether the remarkable chemical properties of the pyranosyl isomer of RNA as an informational Watson‐Crick base‐pairing system are unique to the pentopyranosyl‐(4′→2′)‐oligonucleotide isomer derived from the RNA‐building block D ‐ribose, studies on the entire family of diastereoisomeric pyranosyl‐(4′→2′)‐oligonucleotide systems deriving from D ‐ribose, L ‐lyxose, D ‐xylose, and L ‐arabinose were carried out. The result of these extended studies is unambiguous: not only pyranosyl‐RNA, but all members of the pentopyranosyl‐(4′→2′)‐oligonucleotide family are highly efficient Watson‐Crick base‐pairing systems. Their synthesis and pairing properties will be described in a series of publications in this journal. The present paper describes the α‐L ‐lyxopyranosyl‐(4′→2′)‐system.     

Synthesis and Pairing Properties of 3′‐Deoxyribopyranose (4′→2′)‐Oligonucleotides (‘p‐DNA')

The preparation and the pairing properties of the new 3′‐deoxyribopyranose (4′→2′)‐oligonucleotide (=p‐DNA) pairing system, based on 3′‐deoxy‐β‐D ‐ribopyranose nucleosides is presented. D ‐Xylose was efficiently converted to the prefunctionalized 3‐deoxyribopyranose derivative 4‐O‐[(tert‐butyl)dimethylsilyl]‐3‐deoxy‐D ‐ribopyranose 1,2‐diacetate 8 (obtained as a 4 : 1 mixture of α‐ and β‐D ‐anomers; Scheme 1). From this sugar building block, the corresponding, appropriately protected thymine, guanine, 5‐methylcytosine, and purine‐2,6‐diamine nucleoside phosphoramidites 29 – 32 were prepared in a minimal number of steps (Schemes 2–4). These building blocks were assembled on a DNA synthesizer, and the corresponding p‐DNA oligonucleotides were obtained in good yields after a one‐step deprotection under standard conditions, followed by HPLC purification (Scheme 5 and Table 1). Qualitatively, p‐DNA shows the same pairing behavior as p‐RNA, forming antiparallel, exclusively Watson‐Crick‐paired duplexes that are much stronger than corresponding DNA duplexes. Duplex stabilities within the three related (i.e., based on ribopyranose nucleosides) oligonucleotide systems p‐RNA, p‐DNA, and 3′‐O‐Me‐p‐RNA were compared with each other (Table 2). Intrinsically, p‐RNA forms the strongest duplexes, followed by p‐DNA, and 3′‐O‐Me‐p‐RNA. However, by introducing the nucleobases purine‐2,6‐diamine (D) and 5‐methylcytosine (M) instead of adenine and cytosine, a substantial increase in stability of corresponding p‐DNA duplexes was observed.     

NMR Solution Structure of the Duplex Formed by Self‐Pairing of α‐L‐Arabinopyranosyl‐(4′2′)‐(CGAATTCG)

The solution structure of the duplex formed by α‐L ‐arabinopyranosyl‐(4′→2′)‐(CGAATTCG) was studied by NMR. The resonances of all H‐, P‐ and most C‐atoms could be assigned. Dihedral angles and distance estimates derived from coupling constants and NOESY spectra were used as restraints in a simulated annealing calculation, which generated a well‐defined bundle of structures for the six innermost nucleotide pairs. The essential features of the resulting structures are an antiparallel, Watson Crick‐paired duplex with a strong backbone inclination of ca. −50° and, therefore, predominant interstrand base stacking. The very similar inclination and rise parameters of arabinopyranosyl‐(4′→2′)‐oligonucleotides and p‐RNA explain why these two pentapyranosyl isomers are able to cross‐pair.     

Synthesis and Base Pairing Properties of 1′,5′‐Anhydro‐L‐Hexitol Nucleic Acids (L‐HNA)

Oligonucleotides composed of 1′,5′‐anhydro‐arabino‐hexitol nucleosides belonging to the L series (L ‐HNA) were prepared and preliminarily studied as a novel potential base‐pairing system. Synthesis of enantiopure L ‐hexitol nucleotide monomers equipped with a 2′‐(N⁶‐benzoyladenin‐9‐yl) or a 2′‐(thymin‐1‐yl) moiety was carried out by a de novo approach based on a domino reaction as key step. The L oligonucleotide analogues were evaluated in duplex formation with natural complements as well as with unnatural sugar‐modified oligonucleotides. In many cases stable homo‐ and heterochiral associations were found. Besides T_m measurements, detection of heterochiral complexes was unambiguously confirmed by LC‐MS studies. Interestingly, circular dichroism measurements of the most stable duplexes suggested that L ‐HNA form left‐handed helices with both D and L oligonucleotides.     

Highly Efficient Regio- and Stereoselective Synthesis of β-（1 →6）-Branched β-（1 →3）-Linked Glucohexaose and Its Analogue

A β-（1→）6）-branched β-（1→）3）-linked glucohexaose （1） and its lauryl glycoside （2）, present in many biologically active polysaccharides from traditional herbal medicines such as Ganoderma lucidum, Schizophyllum commune and Lentinus edodes, were highly efficiently synthesized. Coupling of 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-benzoyl-β-D-glucopyranosyl- （1--）3）-2-O-benzoyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-a-D-glucopyranosyl trichloroacetimidate （7） with 3,6-branched acceptors 8 and 12 gave β-（1→）3）-linked pentasaccharides （9） and （13）, then via simple chemical transformation 4＇,6＇-OH pentasaccharide acceptors 10 and 14 were obtained. Regio- and stereoselective coupling of 3 with 10 and 14 gave β-（1→）3）-linked hexasaccharides （11） and （15） as the major products. Deprotection of 11 and 15 provided the target sugar 1 and 2. Thus, a new method for the preparation of this kind of compounds was developed.     

Pentopyranosyl Oligonucleotide Systems,Communication No.12, The β‐D‐Xylopyranosyl‐(4′→2′‐oligonucleotide System

β‐D ‐Xylopyranosyl‐(4′→2′)‐oligonucleotides containing adenine and thymine as nucleobases were synthesized as a part of a systematic study of the pairing properties of pentopyranosyl oligonucleotides. Contrary to earlier expectations based on qualitative conformational criteria, β‐D ‐xylopyranosyl‐(4′→2′)‐oligonucleotides show Watson‐Crick pairing comparable in strength to that shown by pyranosyl‐RNA.     

Synthesis of β-（ 1→6）-Branched （ 1→3）-Glucononaoside with Alter-nate β- and α-Bonds in the Backbone

Lauryl glycoside of β-D-Glcp-(1→3)-[β-D-Glcp-(1→6)-]α-D-Glcp-(1→3)-β-D-Glcp-(1→3)-[β-D-Glcp-(1→6)-]α-D-Glcp-(1→3)-β-D-Glcp-(1→3)-[β-D-Glcp-(1→6)-]β-D-Glcp was synthesized through 3 3 3 strategy. 3-O-Allyl-2,4,6-tri-O-benzoyl-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→3)- -[2, 3, 4, 6-tetra-O-benzoyl-β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→6)-] 1,2-O-isopropylidene-α-D-glucofuranose was used as the key intermediate which was converted to the corresponding trisaccharide donor and acceptor readily.     

Synthesis and Properties of 2′-Deoxy-1′,2′-seco-D-ribosyl (5′ → 3′)oligonucleotides (= 1′,2′-seco-DNA) containing adenine and thymine

Some 2′-deoxy-1′,2′-seco-D-ribosyl (5′→3′)oligonucleotides (= 1′,2′-seco-DNA), differing from natural DNA only by a bond scission between the centers C(1′) and C(2′), were synthesized and studied in order to compare their structure properties and pairing behavior with those of corresponding natural DNA and homo-DNA oligonucleotides (2′,3′-dideoxy-β-D-glucopyranosyl oligonucleotides). Starting from (?)-D-tartaric acid, 2′-deoxy-1′,2′-secoadenosine derivative 9a and 1′,2′-secothymidine ( 9b ) were obtained in pure crystalline form. Using the phosphoramidite variant of the phosphite-triester method, a dinucleotide monophosphate 1′,2′-seco-d(T₂) was synthesized in solution, while oligonucleotides 1′,2′-seco-d[(AT)₆], 1′,2′-seco-d(A₁₀) and 1′,2′-seco-d(T₁₀) were prepared on solid phase with either automated or manual techniques. Results of UV- and CD-spectroscopic as well as gel-electrophoretic studies indicated that neither adenine-thymine base pairing (as observed in natural DNA and homo-DNA), nor the adenine-adenine base pairing (as observed in homo-DNA) was effective in 1′,2′-seco-DNA, Furthermore, hybrid pairing was observed neither between 1′.2′-seco-DNA and natural DNA nor between 1′,2′-seco-DNA and homo-DNA.     

具有β-(1→6)-半乳吡喃糖骨架和α-L-(1→3)-阿拉伯呋喃糖侧链的阿拉伯半乳寡糖的简易合成

4-Methoxyphenyl glycoside of β-D-Galp-(1→6)-[α-L-Araf-(1→3)-]β-D-Galp-(1→6)-β-D-Galp-(1→6)-{β-D-Galp-(1→6)-[α-L-Araf-(1→3)-]β-D-Galp-(1→6)-β-D-Galp-(1→6)-}2β-D-Galp-(1→6)-[α-L-Araf-(1→)3)-]β-D-Galp-(1→)6)-β-D-Galp was synthesized with 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-benzoyl-α-D-galactopyranosyl trichloroacetimidate (1), 6-O-acetyl-2,3,4-tri-O-benzoyl-α-D-galactopyranosyl trichloroacetimidate (11), 4-methoxyphenyl 3-O-allyl-2,4-tri-O-benzoyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (2),isopropyl 3-O-allyl-2,4-tri-O-benzoyl--thio-β-D-galactopyranoside (12),4-methoxyphenyl 2,3,4-tri-O-benzoyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (5), and 2,3,5-tri-O-benzoyl-α-L-arabinofuranosyl trichloroacetimidate (8) as the key synthons.     

2′‐Ethynyl‐DNA: Synthesis and Pairing Properties

2‐Ethynyl‐DNA was developed as a potential DNA‐selective oligonucleotide analog. The synthesis of 2′‐arabino‐ethynyl‐modified nucleosides was achieved starting from properly protected 2′‐ketonucleosides by addition of lithium (trimethylsilyl)acetylide followed by reduction of the tertiary alcohol. After a series of protecting‐group manipulations, phosphoramidite building blocks suitable for solid‐phase synthesis were obtained. The synthesis of oligonucleotides from these building blocks was successful when a fast deprotection scheme was used. The pairing properties of 2′‐arabino‐ethynyl‐modified oligonucleotides can be summarized as follows: 1) The 2′‐arabino‐ethynyl modification of pyrimidine nucleosides leads to a strong destabilization in duplexes with DNA as well as with RNA. The likely reason is that the ethynyl group sterically influences the torsional preferences around the glycosidic bond leading to a conformation not suitable for duplex formation. 2) If the modification is introduced in purine nucleosides, no such influence is observed. The pairing properties are not or only slightly changed, and, in some cases (deoxyadenosine homo‐polymers), the desired stabilization of the pairing with a DNA complementary strand and destabilization with an RNA complement is observed. 3) In oligonucleotides of alternating deoxycytidine‐deoxyguanosine sequence, the incorporation of 2′‐arabino‐ethynyl deoxyguanosine surprisingly leads to the formation of a left‐handed double helix, irrespective of salt concentration. The rationalization for this behavior is that the ethynyl group locks such duplexes in a left‐handed conformation through steric blockade.     

Synthesis and Properties of O‐β‐D‐ribofuranosyl‐(1″→2′)‐guanosine‐5″‐ O‐phosphate and Its Derivatives

The efficient synthesis of O‐β‐D ‐ribofuranosyl‐(1″→2′)‐guanosine‐5″‐O‐phosphate and O‐β‐D ‐ribofuranosyl‐(1″→2′)‐adenosine‐5″‐O‐phosphate, minor tRNA components, have been developed, and their conformational properties were examined by NMR spectroscopy.     

Crystallographic report: L‐(−)‐Dichloro(β‐menthoxycarbonylethyl)tin N,N‐diethyldithiocarbamate

The tin atom in the title compound adopts a distorted octahedral geometry within a CCl₂OS₂ donor set. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Semisynthesis of 3′(2′)‐O‐(Aminoacyl)‐tRNA Derivatives as Ribosomal Substrate

An efficient synthesis of (3′‐terminally) 3′(2′)‐O‐aminoacylated pCpA derivatives is described, which could lead to the production of (aminoacyl)‐tRNAs following T4 RNA ligase mediated ligation. The tetrahydrofuranyl (thf) group was used as a permanent protective group for the 2′‐OH of the cytidine moiety which can be removed during the purification of the 3′(2′)‐O‐aminoacylated‐pCpA. This approach allowed for a general synthesis of (3′‐terminally) 3′(2′)‐O‐aminoacylated oligonucleotides. The fully protected pCpA 14 was synthesized by phosphoramidite chemistry and treated with NH₃ solution to remove the 2‐cyanoethyl and benzoyl groups (→ 15 ; Schemes 1 and 2). The 2′‐O‐thf‐protected‐pCpA 15 was coupled with α‐amino acid cyanomethyl esters, and the products 20a – c were deprotected and purified with AcOH buffer to afford 3′(2′)‐O‐aminoacylated pCpA 21a – c in high yields. The 3′(2′)‐O‐aminoacylated pCpA were efficiently ligated with tRNA(? CA) to yield (aminoacyl)‐tRNA which was an active substrate for the ribosome.     

The 5‐Methylisocytosine β‐D‐Ribopyranosyl (4′ → 2′)‐Oligonucleotide

In the context of Eschenmoser's work on pyranosyl‐RNA (‘p‐RNA’), we investigated the synthesis and base‐pairing properties of the 5‐methylisocytidine derivative. The previously determined clear‐cut restrictions of base‐pairing modes of p‐RNA had led to the expectation that a 5‐methylisocytosine β‐D ‐ribopyranosyl (= D ‐pr(^MeisoC)) based (4′ → 2′)‐oligonucleotide would pair inter alia with D ‐pr(isoG) and L ‐pr(G) based oligonucleotides (D ‐pr and L ‐pr = pyranose form of D ‐ and L ‐ribose, resp.). Remarkably, we could not observe pairing with the D ‐pr(isoG) oligonucleotide but only with the L ‐pr(G) oligonucleotide. Our interpretation concludes that this – at first hand surprising – observation is caused by a change in the nucleosidic torsion angle specific for isoC.     

Regioselective Lactonization of α‐(2→8)‐Trisialic Acid

A simple and selective method has been developed to obtain both monolactones of the title compound, a model compound for biologically important polyneuraminic acid derivatives: acidic lactonization and alkaline hydrolysis of dilactone 1 . The two monolactonized trimers can be separated by capillary electrophoresis, and then distinguished by enzymatic hydrolysis with neuraminidase; only the 2‐monolactone undergoes reaction.