NMR‐Solution Structures in Methanol of an α‐Heptapeptide,of a β3/β2‐Nonapeptide,and of an all‐β3‐Icosapeptide Carrying the 20 Proteinogenic Side Chains

The NMR‐solution structure of an α‐heptapeptide with a central Aib residue was investigated in order to verify that, in contrast to β‐peptides, short α‐peptides do not form a helical structures in MeOH. Although the central Aib residue was found to induce a bend in the experimentally determined structure, no secondary structure typical for longer α‐peptides or proteins was found. A β²/β³‐nonapeptide with polar, positively charged side chains was subjected to NMR analysis in MeOH and H₂O. Whereas, in MeOH, it folds into a 10/12‐helix very similar to the structure determined for a corresponding β²/β³‐nonapeptide with only aliphatic side chains, no dominant conformation could be determined in H₂O. Finally, the NMR analysis of a β³‐icosapeptide containing the side chains of all 20 proteinogenic amino acids in MeOH is described. It revealed that this 20mer folds into a 3₁₄‐helix over its whole length forming six full turns, the longest 3₁₄‐helix found so far. Together, our findings confirm that, in contrast to α‐peptides, β‐peptides not only form helices with just six residues, but also form helices that are longer than helical sections usually observed in proteins or natural peptides. The higher helix‐forming propensity of long β‐peptides is attributed to the conformation‐stabilizing effect of the staggered ethane sections in β‐peptides which outweighs the detrimental effect of the increasing macrodipole.     

Do Valine Side Chains Have an Influence on the Folding Behavior of β‐Substituted β‐Peptides?

The influence of valine side chains on the folding/unfolding equilibrium and, in particular, on the 3₁₄‐helical propensity of β³‐peptides were investigated by means of molecular‐dynamics (MD) simulation. To that end, the valine side chains in two different β³‐peptides were substituted by leucine side chains. The resulting four peptides, of which three have never been synthesized, were simulated for 150 to 200 ns at 298 and 340 K, starting from a fully extended conformation. The simulation trajectories obtained were compared with respect to structural preferences and folding behavior. All four peptides showed a similar folding behavior and were found to predominantly adopt 3₁₄‐helical conformations, irrespective of the presence of valine side chains. No other well‐defined conformation was observed at significant population in any of the simulations. Our results imply that β³‐peptides show a structural preference for 3₁₄‐helices independent of the branching nature of the side chains, in contrast to what has been previously proposed on the basis of circular‐dichroism (CD) measurements.     

NMR‐Structural Investigations of a β3‐Dodecapeptide with Proteinogenic Side Chains in Methanol and in Aqueous Solutions

The structural properties of an all‐β³‐dodecapeptide with the sequence H‐β‐HLys(N^ε‐CO(CH₂)₃‐S Acm)‐β‐HPhe‐β‐HTyr‐β‐HLeu‐β‐HLys‐β‐HSer‐β‐HLys‐β‐HPhe‐β‐HSer‐β‐HVal‐β‐HLys‐β‐HAla‐OH ( 1 ) have been studied by two‐dimensional homonuclear ¹H‐NMR and by CD spectroscopy. In MeOH solution, high‐resolution NMR spectroscopy showed that the β‐dodecapeptide forms an (M)‐3₁₄‐helix, and the CD spectrum corresponds to the pattern expected for an (M)‐3₁₄‐helical secondary structure. In aqueous solution, however, the peptide adopts a predominantly extended conformation without regular secondary‐structure elements, which is in agreement with the absence of the characteristic trough near 215 nm in the CD spectrum. The NMR and CD measurements with solutions of 1 in MeOH containing 3M urea further indicated that the peptide retains the regular secondary structural elements under these conditions, whereas, after addition of 40% (v/v) H₂O to the MeOH solution, the large ¹H‐chemical‐shift dispersion indicative of a defined spatial peptide fold was lost. The β³‐dodecapeptide is – so far – the longest β‐peptide shown to adopt a regular (M)‐3₁₄‐helix conformation in an organic solvent. The observation that the structure of this long β³‐peptide is not maintained in aqueous solution indicates that the (M)‐3₁₄‐fold is primarily stabilized by short‐range interactions.     

β‐Hairpins Generated from Hybrid Peptide Sequences Containing both α‐ and β‐Amino Acids

The incorporation of the β‐amino acid residues into specific positions in the strands and β‐turn segments of peptide hairpins is being systematically explored. The presence of an additional torsion variable about the C(α) C(β) bond (θ) enhances the conformational repertoire in β‐residues. The conformational analysis of three designed peptide hairpins composed of α/β‐hybrid segments is described: Boc‐Leu‐Val‐Val‐^DPro‐β Phe ‐Leu‐Val‐Val‐OMe ( 1 ), Boc‐Leu‐Val‐β Val ‐^DPro‐Gly‐β Leu ‐Val‐Val‐OMe ( 2 ), and Boc‐Leu‐Val‐β Phe ‐Val‐^DPro‐Gly‐Leu‐β Phe ‐Val‐Val‐OMe ( 3 ). 500‐MHz ¹H‐NMR Analysis supports a preponderance of β‐hairpin conformation in solution for all three peptides, with critical cross‐strand NOEs providing evidence for the proposed structures. The crystal structure of peptide 2 reveals a β‐hairpin conformation with two β‐residues occupying facing, non‐H‐bonded positions in antiparallel β‐strands. Notably, βVal(3) adopts a gauche conformation about the C(α) C(β) bond (θ=+65°) without disturbing cross‐strand H‐bonding. The crystal structure of 2 , together with previously published crystal structures of peptides 3 and Boc‐β Phe ‐β Phe ‐^DPro‐Gly‐β Phe ‐β Phe ‐OMe, provide an opportunity to visualize the packing of peptide sheets with local ‘polar segments' formed as a consequence of reversal peptide‐bond orientation. The available structural evidence for hairpins suggests that β‐residues can be accommodated into nucleating turn segments and into both the H‐bonding and non‐H‐bonding positions on the strands.     

Validation of the GROMOS 54A7 Force Field Regarding Mixed α/β‐Peptide Molecules

A molecular‐dynamics (MD) simulation study of two heptapeptides containing α‐ and β‐amino acid residues is presented. According to NMR experiments, the two peptides differ in dominant fold when solvated in MeOH: peptide 3 adopts predominantly β‐hairpin‐like conformations, while peptide 8 adopts a 14/15‐helical fold. The MD simulations largely reproduce the experimental data. Application of NOE atom? atom distance restraining improves the agreement with experimental data, but reduces the conformational sampling. Peptide 3 shows a variety of conformations, while still agreeing with the NOE and ³J‐coupling data, whereas the conformational ensemble of peptide 8 is dominated by one helical conformation. The results confirm the suitability of the GROMOS 54A7 force field for simulation or structure refinement of mixed α/β‐peptides in MeOH.     

β‐Peptidic Secondary Structures Fortified and Enforced by Zn2+ Complexation – On the Way to β‐Peptidic Zinc Fingers?

The correlation between β²‐, β³‐, and β^2,3‐amino acid‐residue configuration and stability of helix and hairpin‐turn secondary structures of peptides consisting of homologated proteinogenic amino acids is analyzed (Figs. 1–3). To test the power of Zn²⁺ ions in fortifying and/or enforcing secondary structures of β‐peptides, a β‐decapeptide, 1 , four β‐octapeptides, 2 – 5 , and a β‐hexadecapeptide, 10 , have been devised and synthesized. The design was such that the peptides would a) fold to a 14‐helix ( 1 and 3 ) or a hairpin turn ( 2 and 4 ), or form neither of these two secondary structures (i.e., 5 ), and b) carry the side chains of cysteine and histidine in positions, which will allow Zn²⁺ ions to use their extraordinary affinity for RS^? and the imidazole N‐atoms for stabilizing or destabilizing the intrinsic secondary structures of the peptides. The β‐hexadecapeptide 10 was designed to a) fold to a turn, to which a 14‐helical structure is attached through a β‐dipeptide spacer, and b) contain two cysteine and two histidine side chains for Zn complexation, in order to possibly mimic a Zn‐finger motif. While CD spectra (Figs. 6–8 and 17) and ESI mass spectra (Figs. 9 and 18) are compatible with the expected effects of Zn²⁺ ions in all cases, it was shown by detailed NMR analyses of three of the peptides, i.e., 2, 3, 5 , in the absence and presence of ZnCl₂, that i) β‐peptide 2 forms a hairpin turn in H₂O, even without Zn complexation to the terminal β³hHis and β³hCys side chains (Fig. 11), ii) β‐peptide 3 , which is present as a 14‐helix in MeOH, is forced to a hairpin‐turn structure by Zn complexation in H₂O (Fig. 12), and iii) β‐peptide 5 is poorly ordered in CD₃OH (Fig. 13) and in H₂O (Fig. 14), with far‐remote β³hCys and β³hHis residues, and has a distorted turn structure in the presence of Zn²⁺ ions in H₂O, with proximate terminal Cys and His side chains (Fig. 15).     

β‐Peptide Conjugates: Syntheses and CD and NMR Investigations of β/α‐Chimeric Peptides,of a DPA‐β‐Decapeptide,and of a PEGylated β‐Heptapeptide

β³‐Peptides consisting of six, seven, and ten homologated proteinogenic amino acid residues have been attached to an α‐heptapeptide (all d‐ amino acid residues; 4 ), to a hexaethylene glycol chain (PEGylation; 5c ), and to dipicolinic acid (DPA derivative 6 ), respectively. The conjugation of the β‐peptides with the second component was carried out through the N‐termini in all three cases. According to NMR analysis (CD₃OH solutions), the (M)‐3₁₄‐helical structure of the β‐peptidic segments was unscathed in all three chimeric compounds (Figs. 2, 4, and 5). The α‐peptidic section of the α/β‐peptide was unstructured, and so was the oligoethylene glycol chain in the PEGylated compound. Thus, neither does the appendage influence the β‐peptidic secondary structure, nor does the latter cause any order in the attached oligomers to be observed by this method of analysis. A similar conclusion may be drawn from CD spectra (Figs. 1, 3, and 5). These results bode well for the development of delivery systems involving β‐peptides.     

Synthesis of β3‐Peptides and Mixed α/β3‐Peptides by Thioligation

Five β‐peptide thioesters ( 1 – 5 , containing 3, 4, 10 residues) were prepared by manual solid‐phase synthesis and purified by reverse‐phase preparative HPLC. A β‐undecapeptide ( 6 ) and an α‐undecapeptide ( 7 ) with N‐terminal β³‐HCys and Cys residues were prepared by manual and machine synthesis, respectively. Coupling of the thioesters with the cysteine derivatives in the presence of PhSH (Scheme and Fig. 1) in aqueous solution occurred smoothly and quantitatively. Pentadeca‐ and heneicosapeptides ( 8 – 10 ) were isolated, after preparative RP‐HPLC purification, in yields of up to 60%. Thus, the so‐called native chemical ligation works well with β‐peptides, producing larger β³‐ and α/β³‐mixed peptides. Compounds 1 – 10 were characterized by high‐resolution mass spectrometry (HR‐MS) and by CD spectroscopy, including temperature and concentration dependence. β‐Peptide 9 with 21 residues shows an intense negative Cotton effect near 210 nm but no zero‐crossing above 190 nm, (Figs. 2–4), which is characteristic of β‐peptidic 3₁₄‐helical structures. Comparison of the CD spectra of the mixed α/β‐pentadecapeptide ( 10 ) and a helical α‐peptide (Fig. 5) indicate the presence of an α‐peptidic 3.6₁₃ helix.     

Automated Solid‐Phase Synthesis and Structural Investigation of β‐Peptidosulfonamides and β‐Peptidosulfonamide/β‐Peptide Hybrids: β‐Peptidosulfonamide and β‐Peptide Foldamers are Two of a Different Kind

Fmoc‐protected β‐aminoethane sulfonylchlorides can be employed for efficient automated solid phase synthesis of β‐peptidosulfonamides and β‐peptidosulfonamide/β‐peptide hybrids containing one or more β‐peptidosulfonamide residues. Thus, Fmoc‐protected β‐aminoethane sulfonylchlorides 5a – c led to the hexa‐β‐peptidosulfonamide 9 and the nona‐β‐peptidosulfonamide 10 . In addition, the β‐peptidosulfonamide/β‐peptide hybrids 13 and 16 , consisting of six and nine β‐residues, respectively, and containing a single β‐peptidosulfonamide unit in the middle, as well as the peptidosulfonamide/β‐peptide hybrid 15 with nine β‐residues, including an N‐terminal β‐peptidosulfonamide residue, were synthesized by automated solid‐phase synthesis. Both CD and NMR spectroscopic measurements did not indicate any helical secondary structure for 9 and 10 . As was shown by CD‐measurements, the β‐peptidosulfonamide residue in the hybrids 13, 15 , and 16 acts as a ‘helix breaker', especially when located in the middle of the hybrid chain ( 13 and 16 ), but, although to a lesser extent, also at the N‐terminus.     

Zn2+‐Complexation by a β‐Peptidic Helix and Hairpin Containing β3hCys and β3hHis Building Blocks: Evidence from CD Measurements. Preliminary Communication

Two new β³‐homohistidine‐ and β³‐homocysteine‐containing β‐peptides have been prepared by solid‐phase synthesis. A β‐octapeptide ( 2 ) contains seven β³‐amino acids and one β²‐amino acid. The β²/β³ segment has been placed in the middle of this peptide, which contains β³‐amino acids of alternating configuration, to induce the formation of a hairpin secondary structure. A β‐decapeptide ( 3 ) has been designed to fold to a 3₁₄‐helical secondary structure with neighboring His side chains in 6‐ and 9‐positions. Circular‐dichroism (CD) measurements show the capability of both peptides to bind Zn²⁺ ions in aqueous solution. In the case of the β‐octapeptide, binding of Zn²⁺ causes a dramatic change of the CD spectrum, indicating a change or a stabilization of its secondary structure. Zn²⁺ Ions clearly stabilize the 3₁₄‐helix of the β‐decapeptide, in neutral and basic solution. For the construction of the two new β‐peptides, we needed to have a supply of the β‐amino acid derivatives Fmoc‐β³hCys(Trt)‐OH and Fmoc‐β³hHis(Trt)‐OH, the preparation of which is described herein.     

The Effect of Backbone‐Heteroatom Substitution on the Folding of Peptides – A Single Fluorine Substituent Prevents a β‐Heptapeptide from Folding into a 314‐Helix (NMR Analysis)

The β‐heptapeptides H‐βhVal‐βhAla‐βhLeu‐βhAla(X_n)‐βhVal‐βhAla‐βhLeu‐OH 3 – 7 with central 3‐amino‐2‐fluoro‐, 3‐amino‐2,2‐difluoro‐, or 3‐amino‐2‐hydroxybutanoic acid residues (βhAla(X_n)) of like and unlike configuration were subjected to a detailed NMR analysis in MeOH solution. For the geminal difluoro and for the F‐ and OH‐substituted derivatives of u‐configuration (see 5, 4 , and 7 , resp.), 14‐helices were found, i.e., with axial disposition of the hetero atoms on the helix. The two compounds containing the central l‐configured β‐amino acid moieties (see 3 and 6 ) are not helical over the full lengths of the chains; they have ‘quasi‐helical’ termini and a central turn consisting of a ten‐membered H‐bonded ring (Fig. 2, d and e). Quantum‐mechanical calculations with l‐ and u‐AcNH‐CHMe‐CHF‐CONH₂ confirm the observed preference for a conformation with antiperiplanar arrangement of the F? C and the C?O bond. The calculated energy difference between the observed ‘non‐helical’ geometry of this moiety and a hypothetical helical one is 6.4 kcal/mol (Fig. 3).     

Synthesis and High‐Resolution NMR Structure of a β3‐Octapeptide with and without a Tether Introduced by Olefin Metathesis

Bridging between (i)‐ and (i+3)‐positions in a β³‐peptide with a tether of appropriate length is expected to prevent the corresponding 3₁₄‐helix from unfolding (Fig. 1). The β³‐peptide H‐β³hVal‐β³hLys‐β³hSer(All)‐β³hPhe‐β³hGlu‐β³hSer(All)‐β³hTyr‐β³hIle‐OH ( 1 ; with allylated βhSer residues in 3‐ and 6‐position), and three tethered β‐peptides 2 – 4 (related to 1 through ring‐closing metathesis) have been synthesized (solid‐phase coupling, Fmoc strategy, on chlorotrityl resin; Scheme). A comparative CD analysis of the tethered β‐peptide 4 and its non‐tethered analogue 1 suggests that helical propensity is significantly enhanced (threefold CD intensity) by a (CH₂)₄ linker between the β³hSer side chains (Fig. 2). This conclusion is based on the premise that the intensity of the negative Cotton effect near 215 nm in the CD spectra of β³‐peptides represents a measure of ‘helical content’. An NMR analysis in CD₃OH of the two β³‐octapeptide derivatives without (i.e., 1 ) and with tether (i.e., 4 ; Tables 1–6, and Figs. 4 and 5) provided structures of a degree of precision (by including the complete set of side chain–side chain and side chain–backbone NOEs) which is unrivaled in β‐peptide NMR‐solution‐structure determination. Comparison of the two structures (Fig. 5) reveals small differences in side‐chain arrangements (separate bundles of the ten lowest‐energy structures of 1 and 4 , Fig. 5, A and B ) with little deviation between the two backbones (superposition of all structures of 1 and 4 , Fig. 5, C ). Thus, the incorporation of a CH₂? O? (CH₂)₄? O? CH₂ linker between the backbone of the β³‐amino acids in 3‐ and 6‐position (as in 4 ) does accurately constrain the peptide into a 3₁₄‐helix. The NMR analysis, however, does not suggest an increase in the population of a 3₁₄‐helical backbone conformation by this linkage. Possible reasons for the discrepancy between the conclusion from the CD spectra and from the NMR analysis are discussed.     

The Propensity of α‐Aminoisobutyric Acid (=2‐Methylalanine; Aib) to Induce Helical Secondary Structure in an α‐Heptapeptide: A Computational Study

We present a molecular‐dynamics simulation study of an α‐heptapeptide containing an α‐aminoisobutyric acid (=2‐methylalanine; Aib) residue, Val¹‐Ala²‐Leu³‐Aib⁴‐Ile⁵‐Met⁶‐Phe⁷, and a quantum‐mechanical (QM) study of simplified models to investigate the propensity of the Aib residue to induce 3₁₀/α‐helical conformation. For comparison, we have also performed simulations of three analogues of the peptide with the Aib residue being replaced by L ‐Ala, D ‐Ala, and Gly, respectively, which provide information on the subtitution effect at C(α) (two Me groups for Aib, one for L ‐Ala and D ‐Ala, and zero for Gly). Our simulations suggest that, in MeOH, the heptapeptide hardly folds into canonical helical conformations, but appears to populate multiple conformations, i.e., C₇ and 3₁₀‐helical ones, which is in agreement with results from the QM calculations and NMR experiments. The populations of these conformations depend on the polarity of the solvent. Our study confirms that a short peptide, though with the presence of an Aib residue in the middle of the chain, does not have to fold to an α‐helical secondary structure. To generate a helical conformation for a linear peptide, several Aib residues should be present in the peptide, either sequentially or alternatively, to enhance the propensity of Aib‐containing peptides towards the helical conformation. A correction of a few of the published NMR data is reported.     

Solid‐Phase Synthesis of a β3‐Icosapeptide Containing the Homologs of the Twenty Common Proteinaceous Amino Acids. Preliminary Communication

An icosapeptide, 1 , containing the β³‐amino acid residues with the 20 proteinogenic side chains has been assembled by manual solid‐phase synthesis, according to the Fmoc strategy. The sequence was chosen in such a way that a possible 3₁₄‐helical conformation (secondary structure) would be stabilized by salt bridges and have an amphipathic character (Fig. 1,a), and the N‐terminal β³hCys would lend itself to thioligations and disulfide formation ( 2 and 3 , in Figs. 1 and 2). The products 1 – 3 were pure according to RP‐HPLC, NMR, and MS analysis (Fig. 1,b and c, Fig. 2,c and d, and Fig. 3). With due caution, the CD spectra in aqueous solution (pH 7) and in MeOH (Fig. 4), with normalized Cotton effects θ =?14000 to ?16000 [deg?cm²?dmol^?1] between 209 and 210 nm, might be taken as an evidence for the presence of 3₁₄‐helical conformations. An evaluation of the data from a 700‐MHz 2D‐NMR measurement of the disulfide 2 in CD₃OH is in progress.     

Mixed β2/β3‐Hexapeptides and β2/β3‐Nonapeptides Folding to (P)‐Helices with Alternating Twelve‐ and Ten‐Membered Hydrogen‐Bonded Rings

The structural properties of four mixed β‐peptides with alternating β²/β³‐ or β³/β²‐sequences have been analyzed by two‐dimensional homonuclear ¹H‐NMR‐ and CD spectroscopic measurements. All four β‐peptides fold into (P)‐helices with twelve‐ and ten‐membered H‐bonded rings (Figs. 3–6). CD Spectra (Fig. 2) of the mixed β³/β²‐hexapeptide 4a and β³/β²‐nonapeptide 5a , indicating that peptides of this type also adopt the 12/10‐helical conformation, were confirmed by NMR structural analysis. For the deprotected β³/β²‐nonapeptide 5d , NOEs not consistent with the 10/12 helix have been observed, showing that the stability of the helix decreases upon N‐terminal deprotection. From the NMR structures obtained, an idealized helical‐wheel representation was generated (Fig. 7), which will be used for the design of further 12/10 or 10/12 helices.     

Efficient Access to Enantiopure γ4‐Amino Acids with Proteinogenic Side‐Chains and Structural Investigation of γ4‐Asn and γ4‐Ser in Hybrid Peptide Helices

Hybrid peptides composed of α‐ and β‐amino acids have recently emerged as new class of peptide foldamers. Comparatively, γ‐ and hybrid γ‐peptides composed of γ⁴‐amino acids are less studied than their β‐counterparts. However, recent investigations reveal that γ⁴‐amino acids have a higher propensity to fold into ordered helical structures. As amino acid side‐chain functional groups play a crucial role in the biological context, the objective of this study was to investigate efficient synthesis of γ⁴‐residues with functional proteinogenic side‐chains and their structural analysis in hybrid‐peptide sequences. Here, the efficient and enantiopure synthesis of various N‐ and C‐terminal free‐γ⁴‐residues, starting from the benzyl esters (COOBzl) of N‐Cbz‐protected (E)‐α,β‐unsaturated γ‐amino acids through multiple hydrogenolysis and double‐bond reduction in a single‐pot catalytic hydrogenation is reported. The crystal conformations of eight unprotected γ⁴‐amino acids (γ⁴‐Val, γ⁴‐Leu, γ⁴‐Ile, γ⁴‐Thr(OtBu), γ⁴‐Tyr, γ⁴‐Asp(OtBu), γ⁴‐Glu(OtBu), and γ‐Aib) reveals that these amino acids adopted a helix favoring gauche conformations along the central C^γ? C^β bond. To study the behavior of γ⁴‐residues with functional side chains in peptide sequences, two short hybrid γ‐peptides P1 (Ac‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Asn‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Leu‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Leu‐CONH₂) and P2 (Ac‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Ser‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Val‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Val‐CONH₂) were designed, synthesized on solid phase, and their 12‐helical conformation in single crystals were studied. Remarkably, the γ⁴‐Asn residue in P1 facilitates the tetrameric helical aggregations through interhelical H bonding between the side‐chain amide groups. Furthermore, the hydroxyl side‐chain of γ⁴‐Ser in P2 is involved in the interhelical H bonding with the backbone amide group. In addition, the analysis of 87 γ⁴‐residues in peptide single‐crystals reveal that the γ⁴‐residues in 12‐helices are more ordered as compared with the 10/12‐ and 12/14‐helices.     

New Open‐Chain and Cyclic Tetrapeptides,Consisting of α‐, β2‐, and β3‐Amino‐Acid Residues,as Somatostatin Mimics – A Survey

Cyclo‐β‐tetrapeptides are known to adopt a conformation with an intramolecular transannular hydrogen bond in solution. Analysis of this structure reveals that incorporation of a β²‐amino‐acid residue should lead to mimics of ‘α‐peptidic β‐turns’ (cf. A, B, C ). It is also known that short‐chain mixed β/α‐peptides with appropriate side chains can be used to mimic interactions between α‐peptidic hairpin turns and G protein‐coupled receptors. Based on these facts, we have now prepared a number of cyclic and open‐chain tetrapeptides, 7 – 20 , consisting of α‐, β²‐, and β³‐amino‐acid residues, which bear the side chains of Trp and Lys, and possess backbone configurations such that they should be capable of mimicking somatostatin in its affinity for the human SRIF receptors (hsst_1–5). All peptides were prepared by solid‐phase coupling by the Fmoc strategy. For the cyclic peptides, the three‐dimensional orthogonal methodology (Scheme 3) was employed with best success. The new compounds were characterized by high‐resolution mass spectrometry, NMR and CD spectroscopy, and, in five cases, by a full NMR‐solution‐structure determination (in MeOH or H₂O; Fig. 4). The affinities of the new compounds for the receptors hsst_1–5 were determined by competition with [¹²⁵I]LTT‐SRIF₂₈ or [¹²⁵I] [Tyr¹⁰]‐CST₁₄. In Table 1, the data are listed, together with corresponding values of all β‐ and γ‐peptidic somatostatin/Sandostatin^® mimics measured previously by our groups. Submicromolar affinities have been achieved for most of the human SRIF receptors hsst_1–5. Especially high, specific binding affinities for receptor hsst₄ (which is highly expressed in lung and brain tissue, although still of unknown function!) was observed with some of the β‐peptidic mimics. In view of the fact that numerous peptide‐activated G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) recognize ligands with turn structure (Table 2), the results reported herein are relevant far beyond the realm of somatostatin: many other peptide GPCRs should be ‘reached’ with β‐ and γ‐peptidic mimics as well, and these compounds are proteolytically and metabolically stable, and do not need to be cell‐penetrating for this purpose (Fig. 5).     

cyclo(β‐Asp‐β3‐hVal‐β3‐hLys) – Solid‐Phase Synthesis and Solution Structure of a Water Soluble β‐Tripeptide. Preliminary Communication

The H₂O‐soluble cyclic β³‐tripeptide cyclo(β‐Asp‐β³‐hVal‐β³‐hLys) ( 4 ) was obtained by on‐resin cyclization of the side‐chain‐anchored β‐peptide 3 (Scheme). In aqueous solution, 4 adopts a structure with uniformly oriented amide bonds and all side chains in lateral positions (Fig. 3).     

A Designed Three‐Stranded β‐Sheet in an α/β Hybrid Peptide

The incorporation of β‐amino acid residues into the antiparallel β‐strand segments of a multi‐stranded β‐sheet peptide is demonstrated for a 19‐residue peptide, Boc‐LV^βFV^DPGL^βFVVL^DPGLVL^βFVV‐OMe (BBH19). Two centrally positioned ^DPro–Gly segments facilitate formation of a stable three‐stranded β‐sheet, in which β‐phenylalanine (^βPhe) residues occur at facing positions 3, 8 and 17. Structure determination in methanol solution is accomplished by using NMR‐derived restraints obtained from NOEs, temperature dependence of amide NH chemical shifts, rates of H/D exchange of amide protons and vicinal coupling constants. The data are consistent with a conformationally well‐defined three‐stranded β‐sheet structure in solution. Cross‐strand interactions between ^βPhe3/^βPhe17 and ^βPhe3/Val15 residues define orientations of these side‐chains. The observation of close contact distances between the side‐chains on the N‐ and C‐terminal strands of the three‐stranded β‐sheet provides strong support for the designed structure. Evidence is presented for multiple side‐chain conformations from an analysis of NOE data. An unusual observation of the disappearance of the Gly NH resonances upon prolonged storage in methanol is rationalised on the basis of a slow aggregation step, resulting in stacking of three‐stranded β‐sheet structures, which in turn influences the conformational interconversion between type I′ and type II′ β‐turns at the two ^DPro–Gly segments. Experimental evidence for these processes is presented. The decapeptide fragment Boc‐LV^βFV^DPGL^βFVV‐OMe (BBH10), which has been previously characterized as a type I′ β‐turn nucleated hairpin, is shown to favour a type II′ β‐turn conformation in solution, supporting the occurrence of conformational interconversion at the turn segments in these hairpin and sheet structures.     

Structure and Conformation of β‐Oligopeptide Derivatives with Simple Proteinogenic Side Chains: Circular Dichroism and Molecular Dynamics Investigations

A careful CD analysis (Figs. 1 – 3 and 5; MeOH or H₂O solutions) of β‐oligopeptides ( 1 – 6 , B , C ) containing four to seven β‐amino acids reveals that seemingly small structural changes cause a switch from the CD pattern (maxima of opposite sign near 215 and 200 nm) associated with a 3₁₄‐helical structure to the CD pattern (single Cotton effect at ca. 205 nm) considered characteristic of a so‐called 12/10‐helical structure, but also exhibited by a β‐peptide adopting a hair‐pin conformation with a ten‐membered H‐bonded ring as the turn motif. Comparison of these CD spectra with those of the trans‐2‐aminocyclohexanecarboxamide oligomers, which give rise to the long‐wavelength Cotton effect only, suggests that the H‐bonded 14‐, 12‐, and 10‐membered ring conformations of the β‐peptides, and not just the entire helix structures, might actually generate the Cotton effects. This interpretation would be compatible with our previous NMR structure determinations of β‐peptides and with previously reported temperature dependences of CD and NMR spectra of β‐peptides. To further substantiate this suggestion, we have performed a statistical analysis of the β‐peptidic conformations generated by molecular‐dynamics calculations (GROMOS96) for a β‐hexapeptide ( C ; the 12/10 helix) and a β‐heptapeptide ( 6 ; the 3₁₄ helix) in MeOH (Figs. 6 – 9). Up to 400,000 conformations at 0.5‐ps intervals were analyzed from up to 200‐ns simulations (at 298 to 360 K). The analysis reveals the co‐existence of the various H‐bonded rings. Remarkably, the central section of the β‐peptide 6 (containing a β^2,3‐amino‐acid residue of like‐configuration!) adopts a ten‐membered‐ring conformation for ca. 5% of the simulation time, while the central section of the β‐peptide C adopts a 14‐membered‐ring conformation for ca. 3% of the time, according to this computational analysis. Further experimental and theoretical work will be necessary to find out to which extent the components (H‐bonded rings) and the entire helical secondary structures of β‐peptides contribute to the observed Cotton effects.