石墨炉原子吸收光谱法测定生活饮用水中砷的方法优化

建立了石墨炉原子吸收光谱(GFAAS)法测定生活饮用水中砷的方法。升压放电空心阴极灯的使用,降低了基线噪声水平和检出限。对温度程序、化学基体改进剂和热稳定剂进行了优化并用于GFAAS测定砷,无需进行初步处理。研究结果显示,线性方程为y=0.005 62x+0.000 04,相关系数R为0.998 3,样品体积为16μL时的检出限为0.26μg/L。加标回收率为98.1%～99.2%,相对标准偏差<5%。取实际饮用水样验证了其适用性。     

氢化物原子荧光光谱法测定水中微量砷和硒

研究了氢化物发生-原子荧光光度法测定水中微量砷和硒的方法。结果表明,检出限:砷为0.0518μg/L,硒为0.0524μg/L;11次测定的相对标准偏差为0.36％～0.62％;标准回收率:砷为96.8％～100.9％;硒为95.9％～103.7％。方法简便、快速、灵敏,适于生活饮用水、地表水和水源水中微量砷、硒的同时测定。     

微波消解-原子荧光光谱法同时测定鱼体中砷和汞

为建立微波消解-原子荧光光谱法同时测定鱼体中砷和汞的测定方法,采用微波消解方法,双道原子荧光光谱法同时测定了鱼体中砷和汞的含量。结果表明,砷与汞的线性范围分别为0.2~2.0μg/L,0.0~50.0μg/L;相关系数分别为r=0.999 8和r=0.999 5;砷回收率为96.5%~101.5%之间,相对标准偏差(n=11)为1.22%,检出限为0.004 2μg/L;汞回收率为98.6%~103.0%,相对标准偏差(n=11)为0.67%,检出限为0.009 6μg/L。用该法测定鱼类中砷和汞,方法灵敏度高、操作简便快速、结果准确可靠。     

微波消解-原子荧光光谱法测定化妆品中的砷

建立了微波消解-原子荧光光谱法测定化妆品中微量砷的方法.砷浓度在0～50.00μg/L范围内与荧光强度呈线性关系,线性方程为,If=56.5486c,相关系数r=0.9993,砷的检出限为0.084μg/L.砷测定结果的相对标准偏差为1.49%(n=6),加标回收率为90.7%～107.5%.用该法对环境标准样品进行测定,结果与标准值相吻合.     

应用双通道原子荧光光度计同时测定饮用水中的砷和汞

使用XGY-6080型双通道原子荧光光度计,同时测定饮用水中的砷和汞。在最佳仪器工作条件下,砷和汞的检出限分别为0.0273μg/L、0.0034μg/L,测定结果的相对标准偏差为1.09%~3.34%(n=7),砷和汞的加标回收率分别为96.59%~103.97%和96.78%~98.95%。     

原子荧光光谱法同时测定化妆品中的锑和砷

采用节约时间的样品前处理方法,建立了AFS法同时检测化妆品中砷和锑。砷和锑的检出限分别为0.010μg/L和0.027μg/L,样品加标回收率分别为90.0%~102.2%、88.3%~102.8%。     

共沉淀富集氢化物发生-原子荧光光谱法同时测定山药中砷和硒

建立了共沉淀富集氢化物发生-原子荧光光谱法同时测定山药中痕量砷、硒。考察了共沉淀剂种类、用量,pH值及硼氢化钾浓度的影响。在优化实验条件下,在0～40μg/L范围内,砷、硒的线性相关系数分别为0.994、0.9967,检出限分别为0.0007μg/L、0.0011μg/L,相对标准偏差砷为1.06%、硒为0.77%。该法用于山药中砷、硒的测定,其平均加入回收率分别为95.4%和90.6%。该方法样液用量少,操作简便,适用于食品中痕量砷、硒的测定。     

利用乙酸对电感耦合等离子体质谱法的增敏效应测定砷与硒

建立了100 g/L乙酸基体改进电感耦合等离子体质谱法分析难电离元素砷和硒的方法。以100 g/L乙酸作为基体改进剂,可使砷和硒信号分别增加4~7倍。方法检出限分别为0.019μg/L和0.11μg/L,6次测定标准样品中10.0μg/L砷和硒的相对标准偏差(RSD)均小于3%。     

氢化物发生-原子荧光法测定海产品中的砷和汞

采用硝酸-高氯酸混合酸湿法消解处理样品,以氢化物发生原子荧光法测定了饶平海域柘林湾中不同养殖场的牡蛎、鱼、虾等海产品中的砷和汞。在最佳测试条件下测得砷和汞的检出限为0.020μg/L和0.009μg/L,相对标准偏差为0.04%~0.11%,回收率为99.2%~106.2%和92.4%~108.0%。     

石墨消解–原子荧光法测定土壤中的汞和砷

采用石墨消解法对土壤样品进行预处理,用原子荧光光度法测定样品中汞和砷的含量。汞的质量浓度c在0.00~1.00μg/L范围内与荧光强度I线性相关,回归方程为I=849.47c–22.356,相关系数r2=0.999 9,检出限为0.001 8μg/g。砷的质量浓度在0.00~10.00μg/L范围内与荧光强度线性相关,回归方程为I=107.22c–28.994,相关系数r2=0.999 9,检出限为0.009 9μg/g。实际土壤样品5次平行测定汞和砷的相对标准偏差分别为6.2%~15.2%,0.8%~9.9%,用本法对黄土标准样品进行测定,测定结果在标准值允许范围内。     

液-液萃取衍生气相色谱法测定饮用水中卤乙酸

建立了测定饮用水中5种卤乙酸的检测方法。水样经硫酸酸化、叔丁基甲醚萃取、硫酸-甲醇衍生化后,用气相色谱电子捕获检测器测定。5种卤乙酸平均加标回收率为74.5%~104.0%,相对标准偏差为3.1%~11.0%(n=6),最低检出限为0.3~15.3μg/L。该法适用于饮用水中卤乙酸的测定。     

AFS和GFAAS法测定富硒粮食中硒含量的比较研究

富硒粮食是产量较大的富硒农产品,受到消费者的喜好。通过原子荧光光谱法(AFS)和石墨炉原子吸收光谱法（GFAAS）分别测定粮食中硒含量。比较这2种常用的硒测定方法,分析影响结果准确度的主要因素、方法的特点及适用条件,为富硒粮食生产监管选择适合分析方法提供参考依据。AFS法的方法检出限为0.2 ug/L,其灵敏度相对较高;GFAAS法的方法检出限为0.6 ug/L,其灵敏度相对较低,但操作较为简捷快速。分别采用这2种方法测定对国家标准物质GBW10045大米中硒含量进行测定,结果准确,这2种方法均适用于富硒粮食的硒含量测定工作。     

虾粉中总砷测定方法的探讨

用氢化物原子荧光光度法测定虾粉中总砷含量时,对干法灰化、湿法消解、微波消解3种样品处理方法对虾粉中砷元素测定结果的影响进行了比较。通过试验确定了最佳消解条件。砷元素浓度在0~10μg/L的范围内与荧光强度呈线性关系,线性相关系数r=0.999 6,检出限为0.2μg/L。比对结果表明,干法灰化适合于测定虾粉中总砷的含量,湿法消解测定总砷的含量偏低,微波消解不适合测定虾粉中总砷的含量。采用干法灰化-氢化物原子荧光光度法测定虾粉中总砷含量,加标回收率为76.2%~106.0%。     

氢化物发生-原子荧光光谱法同时测定水中砷和锑

建立在硝酸介质中用氢化物发生-原子荧光光谱法同时测定水中砷和锑的方法。优化了仪器工作条件、酸度、硼氢化钾及还原剂浓度。砷、锑的线性范围为0～10．0μg／L;检出限分别为0．02,0．01μg／L;测定结果的相对标准偏差分别为1．77％～3．72％,2．95％～4．87％（n=6）;加标回收率分别为98％106％,96％105％。该法操作简便,灵敏度高,快速,便于推广,适用于水中砷和锑的同时测定。     

Optimization of a GFAAS method for determination of total inorganic arsenic in drinking water

The new 10 μg l⁻¹ arsenic standard in drinking water has been a spur to the search for reliable routine analytical methods with a limit of detection at the μg l⁻¹ level. These methods also need to be easy to handle due to the routine analyses that are required in drinking water monitoring. Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) meets these requirements, but the limit of detection is generally too high except for methods using a pre-concentration or separation step. The use of a high-intensity boosted discharge hollow-cathode lamp decreases the baseline noise level and therefore allows a lower limit of detection. The temperature program, chemical matrix modifier and thermal stabilizer additives were optimized for total inorganic arsenic determination with GFAAS, without preliminary treatment. The optimal furnace program was validated with a proprietary software. The limit of detection was 0.26 μg As l⁻¹ for a sample volume of 16 μl corresponding to 4.2 pg As. This attractive technique is rapid as 20 samples can be analysed per hour. This method was validated with arsenic reference solutions. Its applicability was verified with artificial and natural groundwaters. Recoveries from 91 to 105% with relative standard deviation <5% can be easily achieved. The effect of interfering anions and cations commonly found in groundwater was studied. Only phosphates and silicates (respectively at 4 and 20 mg l⁻¹) lead to significant interferences in the determination of total inorganic arsenic at 4 μg l⁻¹.     

Inorganic arsenic speciation in various water samples with GFAAS using coprecipitation

A simple, economic and sensitive method for selective determination of As(III) and As(V) in water samples is described. The method is based on selective coprecipitation of As(III) with Ce(IV) hydroxide in presence of an ammonia/ammonium buffer at pH 9. The coprecipitant was collected on a 0.45 µm membrane filter, dissolved with 0.5 mL of conc. nitric acid and the solution was completed to 2 or 5 mL with distilled water. As(III) in the final solutions was determined by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS). Under the working condition, As(V) was not coprecipitated. Total inorganic arsenic was determined after the reduction of As(V) to As(III) with NaI. The concentration of As(V) was calculated by the difference of the concentrations obtained by the above determinations. Both the determination of arsenic with GF-AAS in presence of cerium and the coprecipitation of arsenic with Ce(IV) hydroxide were optimised. The suitability of the method for determining inorganic arsenic species was checked by analysis of water samples spiked with 4–20 µg L^?1 each of As(III) and As(V). The preconcentration factor was found to be 75 with quantitative recovery (≥95%). The accuracy of the present method was controlled with a reference method based on TXRF. The relative error was under 5%. The relative standard deviations for the replicate analysis ( n?=?5) ranged from 4.3 to 8.0% for both As(III) and As(V) in the water samples. The limit of detection (3σ) for both As (III) and As(V) were 0.05 µg L^?1. The proposed method produced satisfactory results for the analysis of inorganic arsenic species in drinking water, wastewater and hot spring water samples.     

Speciation analysis of arsenic in groundwater from Inner Mongolia with an emphasis on acid-leachable particulate arsenic

Arsenic in drinking water affects millions of people around the world. While soluble arsenic is commonly measured, the amount of particulate arsenic in drinking water has often been overlooked. We report here determination of the acid-leachable particulate arsenic and soluble arsenicals in well water from an arsenic-poisoning endemic area in Inner Mongolia, China. Water samples (583) were collected from 120 wells in Ba Men, Inner Mongolia, where well water was the primary drinking water source. Two methods were demonstrated for the determination of soluble arsenic species (primarily inorganic arsenate and arsenite) and total particulate arsenic. The first method used solid phase extraction cartridges and membrane filters to separate arsenic species on-site, followed by analysis of the individual arsenic species eluted from the cartridges and filters. The other method uses liquid chromatography separation with hydride generation atomic fluorescence detection to determine soluble arsenic species. Analysis of acidified water samples using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry provided the total arsenic concentration. Arsenic concentrations in water samples from the 120 wells ranged from <1 to ∼1000 μg L⁻¹. On average, particulate arsenic accounted for 39 ± 38% (median 36%) of the total arsenic. In some wells, particulate arsenic was six times higher than the soluble arsenic concentration. Particulate arsenic can be effectively removed using membrane filtration. The information on particulate and soluble arsenic in water is useful for optimizing treatment options and for understanding the geochemical behavior of arsenic in groundwater.     

Preconcentration by coprecipitation of arsenic and tin in natural waters with a Ni-pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate complex and their direct determination by solid-sampling atomic-absorption spectrometry

A method for the determination of trace amounts of arsenic and tin in natural waters is described. Trace amounts of arsenic and tin were preconcentrated by coprecipitation with a Ni-ammonium pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (APDC) complex. The coprecipitates obtained were directly analyzed by graphite-furnace atomic-absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) using the Ni-APDC complex solid-sampling technique. The coprecipitation conditions used for the trace amounts of arsenic and tin in natural water were investigated in detail. It was found that arsenic and tin at sub-ng mL(-1) levels were both coprecipitated quantitatively by Ni(PDC)2 in the pH range 2-3. The concentration factors by coprecipitation reached approximately 40,000 when 2 mg nickel was added as a carrier element to 500 mL of the water sample. The proposed method has been applied to the determination of trace amounts of arsenic and tin in river water and seawater reference materials, and the detection limits for arsenic and tin, which were calculated from three times of the standard deviation of the procedural blanks, are 0.02 ng mL(-1) and 0.04 ng mL(-1), respectively, for 500-mL volumes of water sample.     

嵌段分子筛聚合材料P123-SH萃取分离-石墨炉原子吸收光谱法分析痕量铬的形态

研究了嵌段分子筛聚合材料P123-SH萃取分离-石墨炉原子吸收光谱法对尿中痕量铬的形态分析方法,探讨了嵌段分子筛聚合材料P123-SH吸附铬的原理和最佳条件。在pH 7.0、常温下,Cr3+和Cr(Ⅵ)被很好的分离,且Cr3+可被该材料定量吸附,其吸附容量为6.15 mg/g。吸附的Cr3+可用2 mol/L的HCl洗脱,用石墨炉原子吸收法测定洗脱下来的Cr3+,往溶液中加入0.1%抗坏血酸将Cr(Ⅵ)还原为Cr3+测总铬,Cr(Ⅵ)含量为总铬减去Cr3+,方法测定Cr3+的检出限为0.011μg/L(3σ,n=11),线性范围为0.1～10μg/L,加标回收率在94%～106%之间,对0.50μg/L的Cr3+溶液平行测定7次,RSD为3.6%。方法可应用于生物样品和环境样品中痕量铬的形态分析。