Bass’ NK groups and cdh-fibrant Hochschild homology

The K-theory of a polynomial ring R[t] contains the K-theory of R as a summand. For R commutative and containing ?, we describe K _*(R[t])/K _*(R) in terms of Hochschild homology and the cohomology of Kähler differentials for the cdh topology. We use this to address Bass’ question, whether K _n (R)=K _n (R[t]) implies K _n (R)=K _n (R[t ₁,t ₂]). The answer to this question is affirmative when R is essentially of finite type over the complex numbers, but negative in general.     

Onn-th commutators with nilpotent or regular values in rings

Then-th commutator for a,b in a ringR is defined inductively as follows: [a,b]₁=[a,b]=ab−ba and[a,b] _n=[[a,b]₋₁,b]. We characterize the ringsR without non-zero nil right ideals in which[a,b] _nis nilpotent or regular for alla,b∈R. We also examine the case whereR is a semiprime ring with involution in which[t ₁, t₂]_nis nilpotent or regular for all tracest ₁,t₂∈R.     

On the Behrens radical of matrix rings and polynomial rings

It is shown that the Behrens radical of a polynomial ring, in either commuting or non-commuting indeterminates, has the form of “polynomials over an ideal”. Moreover, in the case of non-commuting indeterminates, for a given coefficient ring, the ideal does not depend on the cardinality of the set of indeterminates. However, in contrast to the Brown-McCoy radical, it can happen that the polynomial ring R[X] in an infinite set X of commuting indeterminates over a ring R is Behrens radical while the polynomial ring R〈X〉 in an infinite set Y of non-commuting indeterminates over R is not Behrens radical. This is connected with the fact that the matrix rings over Behrens radical rings need not be Behrens radical. The class of Behrens radical rings, which is closed under taking matrix rings, is described.     

Some limit results for probabilities estimates of Brownian motion with polynomial drift

Let (B _t + f(t)) _t∈[0,+∞) be a Brownian motion with polynomial drift f(t), where f(t) is a polynomial. Some Limit Results for Lower tail and large deviation probabilities estimates, and Level crossing probabilities estimates of (B _t + f(t)) _t∈[0,+∞) are given in this paper.     

Differential polynomial rings which are generalized Asano prime rings

Let R[x; δ] be a differential polynomial ring over a prime Goldie ring R in an indeterminate x, where δ is a derivation of R. In this paper, we describe explicitly the group of δ-stable v-R-ideals and using this results, we show that R[x; δ] is a generalized Asano prime ring if and only if R is a δ-generalized Asano prime ring.     

Reflexive rings and their extensions

A right ideal I is reflexive if xRy ∈ I implies yRx ∈ I for x, y ∈ R. We shall call a ring R a reflexive ring if aRb = 0 implies bRa = 0 for a, b ∈ R. We study the properties of reflexive rings and related concepts. We first consider basic extensions of reflexive rings. For a reduced iedal I of a ring R, if R/I is reflexive, we show that R is reflexive. We next discuss the reflexivity of some kinds of polynomial rings. For a quasi-Armendariz ring R, it is proved that R is reflexive if and only if R[x] is reflexive if and only if R[x; x ^?1] is reflexive. For a right Ore ring R with Q its classical right quotient ring, we show that if R is a reflexive ring then Q is also reflexive. Moreover, we characterize weakly reflexive rings which is a weak form of reflexive rings and investigate its properties. Examples are given to show that weakly reflexive rings need not be semicommutative. It is shown that if R is a semicommutative ring, then R[x] is weakly reflexive.     

Strong S-domains

S-domains and strong S-rings are studied extensively with special emphasis on integral and polynomial ring extensions. The main theorem of this paper is that for a Prüfer domain R, the polynomial ring R[X₁,…X_n] in finitely many indeterminates is a strong S-domain. We also prove that any Prüfer υ-multiplication domain is an S-domain.     

An algorithm for the divisors of monic polynomials over a commutative ring

Gilmer and Heinzer proved that given a reduced ring R, a polynomial f divides a monic polynomial in R[X] if and only if there exists a direct sum decomposition of R = R₀ ⊕ … ⊕ R_m (m ≤ deg f), associated to a fundamental system of idempotents e₀, … , e_m, such that the component of f in each R_i[X] has degree coefficient which is a unit of R_i. We propose to give an algorithm to explicitly find such a decomposition. Moreover, we extend this result to divisors of doubly monic Laurent polynomials.     

On Fourier Transforms of Radial Functions and Distributions

We find a formula that relates the Fourier transform of a radial function on R ⁿ with the Fourier transform of the same function defined on R ⁿ⁺². This formula enables one to explicitly calculate the Fourier transform of any radial function f(r) in any dimension, provided one knows the Fourier transform of the one-dimensional function t?f(|t|) and the two-dimensional function (x ₁,x ₂)?f(|(x ₁,x ₂)|). We prove analogous results for radial tempered distributions.     

Effective computation of singularities of parametric affine curves

Let k be a field of characteristic zero and f(t),g(t) be polynomials in k[t]. For a plane curve parameterized by x=f(t),y=g(t), Abhyankar developed the notion of Taylor resultant (Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, Vol. 35, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1990) which enables one to find its singularities without knowing its defining polynomial. This concept was generalized as D-resultant by Yu and Van den Essen (Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 125(3) (1997) 689), which works over an arbitrary field. In this paper, we extend this to a curve in affine n-space parameterized by x₁=f₁(t),…,x_n=f_n(t) over an arbitrary ground field k, where f₁,…,f_n∈k[t]. This approach compares to the usual approach of computing the ideal of the curve first. It provides an efficient algorithm of computing the singularities of such parametric curves using Gröbner bases. Computational examples worked out by symbolic computation packages are included.     

Centralizers of generalized derivations on multilinear polynomials in prime rings

Let R be a prime ring of characteristic different from 2, with Utumi quotient ring U and extended centroid C, δ a nonzero derivation of R, G a nonzero generalized derivation of R, and f(x ₁, …, x _n ) a noncentral multilinear polynomial over C. If δ(G(f(r ₁, …, r _n ))f(r ₁, …, r _n )) = 0 for all r ₁, …, r _n ∈ R, then f(x ₁, …, x _n )² is central-valued on R. Moreover there exists a ∈ U such that G(x) = ax for all x ∈ R and δ is an inner derivation of R such that δ(a) = 0.     

Convergence of convex integrals in Lp spaces

We consider functionals of the form: I_f(u) = ∝_Tf[t, u(t)]μ(dt), which are defined on spaces L^p(T, R^k), and we study for these functionals the properties of a convergence for which the conjugacy $\text{I}{}_{\mathrm{f}}\text{→ I}{}_{\mathrm{f1}}$ is a continuous operator.     

On annihilators of polynomial near-rings

Let R be a ring and let R ₀[x] be the polynomial near-ring over R. We study relations between the set of annihilators in R and the set of annihilators in R ₀[x].     

Central semicommutative rings

A ring R is central semicommutative if ab = 0 implies that aRb ? Z(R) for any a, b ∈ R. Since every semicommutative ring is central semicommutative, we study sufficient condition for central semicommutative rings to be semicommutative. We prove that some results of semicommutative rings can be extended to central semicommutative rings for this general settings, in particular, it is shown that every central semicommutative ring is nil-semicommutative. We show that the class of central semicommutative rings lies strictly between classes of semicommutative rings and abelian rings. For an Armendariz ring R, we prove that R is central semicommutative if and only if the polynomial ring R[x] is central semicommutative. Moreover, for a central semicommutative ring R, it is proven that (1) R is strongly regular if and only if R is a left GP-V′-ring whose maximal essential left ideals are GW-ideals if and only if R is a left GP-V′-ring whose maximal essential right ideals are GW-ideals. (2) If R is a left SF and central semicommutative ring, then R is a strongly regular ring.     

On questions related to saturated chains of primes in polynomial rings

We propose to give positive answers to the open questions: is R(X,Y) strong S when R(X) is strong S? is R stably strong S (resp., universally catenary) when R[X] is strong S (resp., catenary)? in case R is obtained by a (T,I,D) construction. The importance of these results is due to the fact that this type of ring is the principal source of counterexamples. Moreover, we give an answer to the open questions: is R〈X₁,…,X_n〉 residually Jaffard (resp., totally Jaffard) when R(X₁,…,X_n) is ? We construct a three-dimensional local ring R such that R(X₁,…,X_n) is totally Jaffard (and hence, residually Jaffard) whereas R〈X₁,…,X_n〉 is not residually Jaffard (and hence, not totally Jaffard).     

Extensions of zip rings

A ring R is called right zip provided that if the right annihilator r_R(X) of a subset X of R is zero, r_R(Y)=0 for a finite subset Y⊆X. Faith [5] raised the following questions: When does R being a right zip ring imply R[x] being right zip?; Characterize a ring R such that Mat_n(R) is right zip; When does R being a right zip ring imply R[G] being right zip when G is a finite group? In this note, we continue the study of the extensions of noncommutative zip rings based on Faith's questions.     

Skew inverse power series rings over a ring with projective socle

A ring R is called a right PS-ring if its socle, Soc(R _R ), is projective. Nicholson and Watters have shown that if R is a right PS-ring, then so are the polynomial ring R[x] and power series ring R[[x]]. In this paper, it is proved that, under suitable conditions, if R has a (flat) projective socle, then so does the skew inverse power series ring R[[x ^?1; α, δ]] and the skew polynomial ring R[x; α, δ], where R is an associative ring equipped with an automorphism α and an α-derivation δ. Our results extend and unify many existing results. Examples to illustrate and delimit the theory are provided.     

On differential polynomial rings over locally nilpotent rings

Let δ be a derivation of a locally nilpotent ring R. Then the differential polynomial ring R[X; δ] cannot be mapped onto a ring with a non-zero idempotent. This answers a recent question by Greenfeld, Smoktunowicz and Ziembowski.     

Closed Polynomials in Polynomial Rings over Unique Factorization Domains

Let R be a UFD, and let M(R, n) be the set of all subalgebras of the form R[f], where f ∈ R[x ₁,…, x _n ]?R. For a polynomial f ∈ R[x ₁,…, x _n ]?R, we prove that R[f] is a maximal element of M(R, n) if and only if it is integrally closed in R[x ₁,…, x _n ] and Q(R)[f] ∩ R[x ₁,…, x _n ] = R[f]. Moreover, we prove that, in the case where the characteristic of R equals zero, R[f] is a maximal element of M(R, n) if and only if there exists an R-derivation on R[x ₁,…, x _n ] whose kernel equals R[f].     

Some stably tame polynomial automorphisms

We study the structure of length three polynomial automorphisms of R[X,Y] when R is a UFD. These results are used to prove that if SL_m(R[X₁,X₂,…,X_n])=E_m(R[X₁,X₂,…,X_n]) for all n≥0 and for all m≥3 then all length three polynomial automorphisms of R[X,Y] are stably tame.