Synthesis and Structures of d10–d10 M2(μ‐dppm)2 Complexes with Sensitive Metal–Metal Distances in Response to the Binding of Sigma Donors

Diphosphine‐bridged dicopper(I) acetate complexes [Cu₂(μ‐dppm)₂(μ‐OAc)]X ( 2 X; X^? = , ) and [Cu₂(μ‐dppm)₂(μ‐OAc)(MeCN)]X ( 4 X) were prepared and the structures of 2 (PF₆ ) and 4 (PF₆ ) determined by X‐ray crystallography. The ground‐state geometries of [Cu₂(μ‐dppm)₂(μ‐OAc)]⁺ and [Cu₂(μ‐dppm)₂(μ‐OAc)(L)]⁺ (L = py, MeCN, THF, acetone, MeOH) were also obtained using density functional theory (DFT). The increased Cu – Cu distances found experimentally and theoretically by comparing the structures of cation [Cu₂(μ‐dppm)₂(μ‐OAc)]⁺ and its derivatives [Cu₂(μ‐dppm)₂(μ‐OAc)(L)]⁺ reflect the binding of various sigma donors (L). When using [Cu₂(μ‐dppm)₂(μ‐OAc)]⁺ as a structure sensor, the electron‐donating strength of a sigma donor can be quantitatively expressed as a DFT‐calculated Cu – Cu distance with the relative strength in the order py > MeCN > THF > acetone > MeOH, as determined.     

Metal—-Metal “Communication” of Rh or Pd with Nd in Novel Heterobinuclear Complexes

The reaction of a neodymium “ate” complex and an electron-rich transition metal chloride by salt elimination is an efficient method for synthesizing heterobinuclear compounds which contain a lanthanide and a Group 9 or 10 metal [Eq. (1), H₂Ap=2-amino-4-methylpyridine]. The use of bisaminopyridinato ligands allows extremely short distances between Rh or Pd and Nd.     

Photoluminescent Rigid Molecular Rods with Cumulenic Cn (n=3, 4) Spacers: Modulation of Electronic Interaction

Varying the length of the carbon chain in the bridge of complexes of types 1 and 2 can influence the photophysical properties and redox potentials of the metal centers as well as the electronic communication between these metal centers (M=Ru, Os; bpy=2,2′-bipyridine).     

The 3[ndσ*(n+1)pσ] Emissions of Linear Silver(I) and Gold(I) Chains with Bridging Phosphine Ligands

The complexes [Au₃(dcmp)₂][X]₃ {dcmp=bis(dicyclohexylphosphinomethyl)cyclohexylphosphine; X=Cl^? ( 1 ), ClO₄^? ( 2 ), OTf^? ( 3 ), PF₆^? ( 4 ), SCN^?( 5 )}, [Ag₃(dcmp)₂][ClO₄]₃ ( 6 ), and [Ag₃(dcmp)₂Cl₂][ClO₄] ( 7 ) were prepared and their structures were determined by X‐ray crystallography. Complexes 2 – 4 display a high‐energy emission band with λ_max at 442–452 nm, whereas 1 and 5 display a low‐energy emission with λ_max at 558–634 nm in both solid state and in dichloromethane at 298 K. The former is assigned to the ³[5dσ*6pσ] excited state of [Au₃(dcmp)₂]³⁺, whereas the latter is attributed to an exciplex formed between the ³[5dσ*6pσ] excited state of [Au₃(dcmp)₂]³⁺ and the counterions. In solid state, complex [Ag₃(dcmp)₂][ClO₄]₃ ( 6 ) displays an intense emission band at 375 nm with a Stokes shift of ≈7200 cm^?1 from the ¹[4dσ*→5pσ] absorption band at 295 nm. The 375 nm emission band is assigned to the emission directly from the ³[4dσ^*5pσ] excited state of 6 . Density functional theory (DFT) calculations revealed that the absorption and emission energies are inversely proportional to the number of metal ions (n) in polynuclear Au^I and Ag^I linear chain complexes without close metal???anion contacts. The emission energies are extrapolated to be 715 and 446 nm for the infinite linear Au^I and Ag^I chains, respectively, at metal???metal distances of about 2.93–3.02 Å. A QM/MM calculation on the model [Au₃(dcmp)₂Cl₂]⁺ system, with Au???Cl contacts of 2.90–3.10 Å, gave optimized Au???Au distances of 2.99–3.11 Å in its lowest triplet excited state and the emission energies were calculated to be at approximately 600–690 nm, which are assigned to a three‐coordinate Au^I site with its spectroscopic properties affected by Au^I???Au^I interactions.     

Thermally Stable Heterobinuclear Bivalent Group 14 Metal Complexes Ar2M−Sn[1,8-(NR)2C10H6] (M=Ge,Sn; Ar=2,6-(Me2N)2C6H3; R=CH2tBu)

The first thermally robust Ge ^II −Sn ^II compound 1 and the structurally characterized Sn^II-Sn^II analogue 2 , which maintain their structural integrity in solution, were obtained by treating MAr₂ (M=Ge, Sn; Ar=2,6-(Me₂N)₂C₆H₃) with Sn[1,8-(NR₂)₂C₁₀H₆] (R=CH₂tBu). On the basis of structural and spectroscopic data, the M−Sn bond is regarded as the interaction of a MAr₂ donor with an Sn[1,8-(NR₂)₂C₁₀H₆] acceptor.     

Synthesis and Structures of Dinuclear Copper(I) and Silver(I) 1, 3‐Bis[(2‐chloro)benzene]triazenide Complexes

In the presence of Et₃N, the reaction of 1, 3‐bis[(2‐chloro)benzene]triazene (HL) with CuCl or AgNO₃ gives the triazenide complexes {Cu₂(L)₂} ( 1 ) and {Ag₂(L)₂} ( 2 ), respectively. The X‐ray crystal structures of both complexes were obtained. The metal–metal distances (Cu ··· Cu and Ag ··· Ag) are 2.4974(5) and 2.7208(5) Å, respectively.     

Steering of Configuration by (2‐Phosphanyl)phenolato Ligands in Trimethylphosphane Iron Complexes

(Diphenylphosphanyl)phenols C₆H₃(1‐OH)(2‐PPh₂)(4‐R¹)(6‐R²), abbreviated as (P^∧OH), oxidatively add to Fe(PMe₃)₄ affording hydridoiron(II) compounds fac‐FeH(P^∧O)(PMe₃)₃ ( 1 : R¹=R²=H; 2 : R¹=Me, R²=H; 3 : R¹=OMe, R²=H; 4 : R¹=Me, R²=CMe₃; 5 : R¹=R²=CMe₃) with high stereoselectivity. (2‐diphenylphosphanyl)thiophenol (P^∧SH) reacts accordingly forming fac‐FeH(P^∧S)(PMe₃)₃ ( 9 ). Complete assignment of ¹H, ¹³C, and ³¹P signals is achieved by 2D heteronuclear shift correlations. 4,6‐Di‐tert‐butyl‐(2‐diphenylphosphanyl)phenol reacts with FeI(Me)(PMe₃)₄ to form FeI(P^∧O)(PMe₃)₂ ( 6 ). 4 , 5 and 9 under 1 bar of CO are converted to monocarbonyl derivatives FeH(P^∧X)(CO)(PMe₃)₂ ( 7 , 8 : X = O; 10 : X = S) which in solution form mixtures of two isomers A and B . 4 and 5 react with their parent phosphanylphenols, respectively, to give diamagnetic complexes Fe(P^∧O)₂(PMe₃) ( 11 , 12 ) which dissociate trimethylphosphane to give paramagnetic compounds Fe(P^∧O)₂. The same phosphanylphenols react with FeCl₃ to afford racemic mixtures of complexes Fe(P^∧O)₃ ( 13 , 14 ). Structural data were also obtained from single crystals of compounds 1 , 5 , and 11 .     

Coinage Metal Complexes of a Tellurium Diimide: cis→trans Isomerization and Metal–Metal Interactions

The different coordination behavior of the ligand tBuN=Te(μ-NtBu)₂Te=NtBu (L) towards Cu⁺ and Ag⁺ results from a cis→trans isomerization. The two Cu⁺ ions in [Cu₂L₃]²⁺ (shown schematically) bridge trans and cis isomers of the ligand, whereas the Ag⁺ ions in [Ag₂L₂]²⁺ link two trans ligands and exhibit a weak Ag⋅⋅⋅Ag interaction.     

Iron and Nickel Complexes Containing β‐Diketiminato Ligands with Thioether Tethers

A novel β‐diketiminato ligand precursor, LH ( II ), containing thioether tethers was synthesized by the reaction of acetylacetone and 2‐methylthioaniline. II was deprotonated and used in the synthesis of two iron(II) complexes, [LFeCl] ( 1 ), and [LFeOTf] ( 2 ), and one nickel(II) complex, [LNiBr] ( 3 ). All three compounds were characterized by means of single crystal X‐ray diffraction and their structures are discussed.     

[Bi2(O2CCF3)4]⋅C6Me6—Arene Adduct of a Reduced Main Group Element Carboxylate with Paddle Wheel Structure

The first main group dimetal complex with tetragonal-prismatic coordination is [Bi₂(O₂CCF₃)₄] (structure depicted), which forms a component of a linear one-dimensional coordination copolymer with hexamethylbenzene molecules. The “paddle wheel” motif well-known from chromium(II ) acetate and hundreds of other transition metal complexes is thus introduced into the coordination chemistry of main group elements.     

The σ2π4 Triple Bond between Molybdenum and Tungsten Atoms: Developing the Chemistry of an Inorganic Functional Group

Numerous analogies between organic and inorganic chemistry have emerged in recent years. The most prominent example is the isolobal relationship. Many reactions have shown that metal-metal double and triple bonds exhibit a pattern of reactivity similar to that of alkenes and alkynes. In compounds containing a σ²π⁴ triple bond between molybdenum and tungsten atoms, the M? M bond order can be increased from three to four by reductive elimination or decreased from three to two or one by oxidative addition. Complexes with M?M bonds can be used to prepare clusters or can serve as catalysts. In this review relationships between structure (electronic and stereochemical) and reactivity that are characteristic for modern inorganic chemistry are discussed.     

The Quest for PdII–PdII Interactions: Structural and Spectroscopic Studies and Ab Initio Calculations on Dinuclear [Pd2(CN)4(μ‐diphosphane)2] Complexes

Structural and spectroscopic properties of and theoretical investigations on dinuclear [Pd₂(CN)₄(P–P)₂] (P–P=bis(dicyclohexylphosphanyl)methane ( 1 ), bis(dimethylphosphanyl)methane ( 2 )) and mononuclear trans‐[Pd(CN)₂(PCy₃)₂] ( 3 ) complexes are described. Xray structural analyses reveal Pd???Pd distances of 3.0432(7) and 3.307(4) Å in 1 and 2 , respectively. The absorption bands at λ>270 nm in 1 and 2 have 4d →5p_σ electronic‐transition character. Calculations at the CIS level indicate that the two low‐lying dipole‐allowed electronic transition bands in model complex [Pd₂(CN)₄(μ‐H₂PCH₂PH₂)₂] at 303 and 289 nm are due to combinations of many orbital transitions. The calculated interaction‐energy curve for the skewed dimer [{trans‐[Pd(CN)₂(PH₃)₂]}₂] is attractive at the MP2 level and implies the existence of a weak Pd^II–Pd^II interaction.     

β‐Diketiminate‐Stabilized Magnesium(I) Dimers and Magnesium(II) Hydride Complexes: Synthesis,Characterization, Adduct Formation,and Reactivity Studies

The preparation and characterization of a series of magnesium(II) iodide complexes incorporating β‐diketiminate ligands of varying steric bulk and denticity, namely, [(ArNCMe)₂CH]^? (Ar=phenyl, (^PhNacnac), mesityl (^MesNacnac), or 2,6‐diisopropylphenyl (Dipp, ^DippNacnac)), [(DippNCtBu)₂CH]^? (^tBuNacnac), and [(DippNCMe)(Me₂NCH₂CH₂NCMe)CH]^? (^DmedaNacnac) are reported. The complexes [(^PhNacnac)MgI(OEt₂)], [(^MesNacnac)MgI(OEt₂)], [(^DmedaNacnac)MgI(OEt₂)], [(^MesNacnac)MgI(thf)], [(^DippNacnac)MgI(thf)], [(^tBuNacnac)MgI], and [(^tBuNacnac)MgI(DMAP)] (DMAP=4‐dimethylaminopyridine) were shown to be monomeric by X‐ray crystallography. In addition, the related β‐diketiminato beryllium and calcium iodide complexes, [(^MesNacnac)BeI] and [{(^DippNacnac)CaI(OEt₂)}₂] were prepared and crystallographically characterized. The reductions of all metal(II) iodide complexes by using various reagents were attempted. In two cases these reactions led to the magnesium(I) dimers, [(^MesNacnac)MgMg(^MesNacnac)] and [(^tBuNacnac)MgMg(^tBuNacnac)]. The reduction of a 1:1 mixture of [(^DippNacnac)MgI(OEt₂)] and [(^MesNacnac)MgI(OEt₂)] with potassium gave a low yield of the crystallographically characterized complex [(^DippNacnac)Mg(μ‐H)(μ‐I)Mg(^MesNacnac)]. All attempts to form beryllium(I) or calcium(I) dimers by reductions of [(^MesNacnac)BeI], [{(^DippNacnac)CaI(OEt₂)}₂], or [{(^tBuNacnac)CaI(thf)}₂] have so far been unsuccessful. The further reactivity of the magnesium(I) complexes [(^MesNacnac)MgMg(^MesNacnac)] and [(^tBuNacnac)MgMg(^tBuNacnac)] towards a variety of Lewis bases and unsaturated organic substrates was explored. These studies led to the complexes [(^MesNacnac)Mg(L)Mg(L)(^MesNacnac)] (L=THF or DMAP), [(^MesNacnac)Mg(μ‐AdN₆Ad)Mg(^MesNacnac)] (Ad=1‐adamantyl), [(^tBuNacnac)Mg(μ‐AdN₆Ad)Mg(^tBuNacnac)], and [(^MesNacnac)Mg(μ‐tBu₂N₂C₂O₂)Mg(^MesNacnac)] and revealed that, in general, the reactivity of the magnesium(I) dimers is inversely proportional to their steric bulk. The preparation and characterization of [(^tBuNacnac)Mg(μ‐H)₂Mg(^tBuNacnac)] has shown the compound to have different structural and physical properties to [(^tBuNacnac)MgMg(^tBuNacnac)]. Treatment of the former with DMAP has given [(^tBuNacnac)Mg(H)(DMAP)], the X‐ray crystal structure of which disclosed it to be the first structurally authenticated terminal magnesium hydride complex. Although attempts to prepare [(^MesNacnac)Mg(μ‐H)₂Mg(^MesNacnac)] were not successful, a neutron diffraction study of the corresponding magnesium(I) complex, [(^MesNacnac)MgMg(^MesNacnac)] confirmed that the compound is devoid of hydride ligands.     

Reactions of tBu2P–PLi–PtBu2 with [(Et3P)2MCl2] (M = Ni,Pd, Pt). Synthesis and Properties of [(1,2‐η‐tBu2P=P–PtBu2)M(PEt3)Cl] (M=Ni,Pd)

^tBu₂P–PLi–P^tBu₂·2THF reacts with [cis‐(Et₃P)₂MCl₂] (M = Ni, Pd) yielding [(1,2‐η‐^tBu₂P=P–P^tBu₂)Ni(PEt₃)Cl] and [(1,2‐η‐^tBu₂P=P–P^tBu2)Pd(PEt₃)Cl], respectively. ^tBu₂P– PLi–P^tBu₂ undergoes an oxidation process and the ^tBu₂P–P–P^tBu₂ ligand adopts in the products the structure of a side‐on bonded 1,1‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2‐(di‐tert‐butylphosphino)diphosphenium cation with a short P–P bond. Surprisingly, the reaction of ^tBu₂P–PLi–P^tBu₂·2THF with [cis‐(Et₃P)₂PtCl₂] does not yield [(1,2‐η‐^tBu₂P=P–P^tBu₂)Pt(PEt₃)Cl].     

Unprecedented Efficient Structure Controlled Phosphorescence of Silver(I) Clusters Stabilized by Carba‐closo‐dodecaboranylethynyl Ligands

{Ag₂(12‐C≡C‐closo‐1‐CB₁₁H₁₁)}_n and selected pyridine ligands have been used for the synthesis of photostable Ag^I clusters that, with one exception, exhibit for Ag^I compounds unusual room‐temperature phosphorescence. Extraordinarily intense phosphorescence was observed for a distorted pentagonal bipyramidal Ag^I₇ cluster that shows an unprecedented quantum yield of Φ=0.76 for Ag^I clusters. The luminescence properties correlate with the structures of the central Ag^I_n motifs as shown by comparison of the emission properties of the clusters with different numbers of Ag^I ions, different charges, and electronically different pyridine ligands.