The Coprecipitation of Zinc Aluminium Hydroxide Powders from Aqueous Solution with Sodium Hydroxide: Precipitate Compositions and Coprecipitation Mechanisms

Zine aluminium hydroxides were coprecipitated from different mixed metal cation solutions, at C_{M tot} = 0.1 M and at Zn/Al₂ ratios from 1 to 4, with sodium hydroxide solution. The coprecipitations were monitored by potentiometrie (pH) titration and the final coprecipitate compositions were examined by chemical analysis, infra-red spectrophotometry and thermal analysis. Generally, microcrystalline aluminium hydroxide was first precipitated at pH about 4; this then partially redissolved on further addition of sodium hydroxide (to form hydroxoaluminate anion) and zinc aluminium hydroxide coprecipitates were formed continuously at pHs from 5.5–6 to above 9. Their compositions were similar to the magnesium hydroxoaluminate coprecipitated from magnesium aluminium solutions. At Zn/Al₂ ratio = 1, the main phase was probably Zn(H₂O)_n [Al(OH)₄]₂; at Zn/Al₂ ratio = 2, the main phase was probably Zn₂(H₂O)_n [Al₂(OH)₁₀], whereas at Zn/Al₂ ratio = 4, the main phase was probably Zn(H₂O)_n(OH)₄[Al₂(OH)₁₀].     

The coprecipitation of magnesium chromium hydroxide powders from aqueous solution: Precipitate compositions and coprecipitation mechanisms

Magnesium chromium (III) hydroxides were coprecipitated at ambient temperature from different mixed metal cation solutions — at C_Mtot = 0.1 M and Mg/Cr₂ ratios varying from 1 to 4 — with sodium hydroxide solution. The coprecipitations were monitored by potentiometric (pH) titration and the final precipitate compositions were examined by chemical analysis, i.r. spectrophotometry and thermal analysis. Generally, microcrystalline chromium(III) hydroxide was first precipitated at pH about 5; this material then redissolved on further addition of hydroxyl ion to form hydroxochromate(III) anion and magnesium chromium hydroxide coprecipitates were then formed continuously (at OH/Cr ratios from 4 to 10) at pHs from 9.5–10 to about 11. The coprecipitates from Mg/Cr₂ = 1 systems was predominately magnesium hydroxochromate hydrate. The coprecipitates from Mg/Cr₂ = 2 to 4 systems were mixture or solid solutions of magnesium hydroxochromate hydrate with increasing amounts of magnesium hydroxide. The ionic equilibria involved in different coprecipitations are discussed.     

The precipitation of iron (II) and nickel oxalates with alkaline-earth metal oxalates: Induction periods,nucleation rates and mechanisms

The coprecipitations of magnesium (and barium) iron(II) and nickel oxalate dihydrates were studied from excess magnesium and barium oxalate solutions. Nucleation rates were estimated from the induction periods for the coprecipitations. The nucleation rates in excess magnesium oxalate solutions first decreased with increasing excess oxalate anion concentration to minimum values and then increased with increasing magnesium cation concentration. At low to intermediate Mg/Fe(II) (and Mg/Ni) ratios the main nuclei were FeOx (and NiOx); at intermediate Mg/Fe(II) (and Mg/Ni) ratios the main nuclei were probably MgOx FeOx (and MgOx NiOx) mixtures and/or solid solutions of compositions Mg_αFe_{1 α}Ox (and Mg_αNi_{1 α}Ox); at high Mg/Fe(II) (and Mg/Ni) ratios the main nuclei were MgOx. The nucleation rates in excess barium oxalate solutions were similar to those for the precipitation of barium oxalate from supersaturated equivalent solutions. The main nuclei in most systems were BaOx.     

The coprecipitation of magnesium hydroxoaluminate hydrates from aqueous solution with ammonium hydroxide: Precipitate compositions and coprecipitation mechanisms

Magnesium hydroxoaluminate hydrates were coprecipitated from different mixed metal cation solutions at Mg/Al₂ ratios from 1 to 4 by ammonium hydroxide. The coprecipitations were monitored by potentiometric titration and the final precipitate compositions were examined by chemical analysis, X-ray diffraction, infra-red spectrophotometry and thermal analysis. The process of coprecipitation was similar to that for coprecipitation with sodium hydroxide but large excess of ammonium hydroxide was required for complete reaction at pHs from about 8 to 10.

• At Mg/Al₂ = 1, the main phase was probably Mg(H₂O)_h [Al(OH)₄]₂;
• at Mg/Al₂ = 2, the main phase was probably Mg₂(H₂O)_h [Al₂(OH)₁₀];
• at Mg/Al₂ = 4, the main phase was probably (MgOH₄) (H₂O)^h [Al₂(OH)₁₀].

     

The coprecipitation of calcium aluminium hydroxide (calcium hydroxoaluminate hydrate) powders from aqueous solution with sodium hydroxide: Precipitate compositions and percipitation mechanisms

Calcium aluminium hydroxides were coprecipitated from different mixed metal cation solutions — at total C_M = 0.1 M and Ca/Al₂ ratios from 1 to 4 — with sodium hydroxide solution at ambient temperature. The coprecipitations were monitored by potentiometric (pH) titration and the final coprecipitate compositions were examined by chemical analysis, infra-red spectrophotometry and thermal analysis Generally, microcrystalline aluminium hydroxide was first precipitated at pH about 4; this then redissolved on further addition of sodium hydroxide to form hydroxoaluminate anion and polyanion and calcium aluminium hydroxide coprecipitates were formed continuously at pHs from about 9 to above 12. Their compositions were similar to the calcium hydroxoaluminate hydrates formed by direct precipitation from high pH sodium hydroxoaluminate solutions. At Ca/Al₂ ratio = 1, the main phase was probably Ca₂(H₂O)_h[Al₂(OH)₄]₂ with some Al(OH)₃; At Ca/Al₂ ratio = 2, the main phase was probably Ca₂(H₂O)_h[Al₂(OH)₁₀] dehydrating to Ca₂[Al₂O(OH)₈]; At Ca/Al₂ ratios = 3–4, the main phase was Ca₂(H₂O)_h[Al₂(OH)₁₀] with increasing amounts of Ca₄(H₂O)_h(OH)₄[Al₂(OH)₁₀] and 5–10 percent adsorbed or post-precipitated Ca(OH)₂.     

The coprecipitation of magnesium aluminium hydroxocarbonate powders from aqueous solution: Precipitate compositions and coprecipitation mechanisms

Magnesium aluminium hydroxocarbonate hydrates were coprecipitated from mixed metal nitrate solutions, at total C_M = 0.2 M and Mg/Al₂ = 1 ratio, with four sodium hydrogen carbonate-sodium carbonate solutions (of pH 8.1 to 11.5) at ambient temperature. The course of precipitation was monitored by potentiometric (pH) titration, and the compositions of the primary and final precipitates were determined by chemical analysis, infrared spectrophotometry and X-ray diffraction. Precipitation generally occurred through three stages, primary precipitation (of low CO₃ aluminium hydroxocarbonates) at low pH with evolution of carbon dioxide, their dissolution by complexing to form hydroxocarbonatoaluminate anions and then secondary precipitation of the final coprecipitate at higher pHs. The final product from coprecipitation by sodium hydrogen carbonate solution (pH 8.1) was mainly the magnesium hydroxocarbonatoaluminate ‘MAHC I’; the final products from coprecipitation by sodium hydrogen carbonate-sodium carbonate solutions (pH 9.4 and 10.3) were ‘MAHC I’/‘MAHC II’ mixture and ‘MAHC II’/‘MAHC I’ mixture whereas the final product from coprecipitation by sodium carbonate solution (pH 11.5) was a complex mixture if ‘MAHC II’ with ‘MAHC I’ and ‘MAHC III’;

• ‘MAHC I’ was probably Mg₂[Al₄(OH)₁₀(CO₃)₃] · hH₂O,
• ‘MAHC II’ was probably Mg[Al₂(OH)₄(CO₃)₂] · h H₂O whereas
• ‘MAHC III’ was probably Mg[Al₂(OH)₆CO₃] · h H₂O.

     

Influence of solvents on the hydrothermal formation of one‐dimensional magnesium hydroxide

The influence of solvents on the hydrothermal formation of one‐dimensional (1D) magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)₂) was investigated in this paper. Uniform 1D Mg(OH)₂ with a length of 10‐20 μm, a width of 100‐200 nm and a preferential growth along [110] direction have been synthesized by treating magnesium oxysulfate (5Mg(OH)₂·MgSO₄·3H₂O, abbreviated as 513MOS) nanowires in NaOH ethanol solution at 180 °C for 2.0 h. The experimental results indicated that the solvent of ethanol and NaOH concentration were essential for the conversion of 513MOS nanowires to 1D Mg(OH)₂. The slow release of MgSO₄ from 513MOS and the heterogenous precipitation of Mg(OH)₂ at the defects left by MgSO₄ dissolution promoted the formation of 1D Mg(OH)₂. (© 2008 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

The precipitation of magnesium hydroxoaluminate hydrate powders from sodium hydroxoaluminate solutions: Precipitate phases and precipitation mechanisms

Magnesium hydroxoaluminate hydrates were precipitated from different sodium hydroxoaluminate and hydroxoaluminate-hydroxide solutions at ambient temperature, at C_Al = 0.1 M, OH/Al ratios = 4–9 and XS OH/Al ratios = 1–6. The precipitations were monitored by potentiometric (pH) measurements while the final precipitate compositions were examined by chemical analysis, infra-red spectrophotometry and thermal analysis. At solution OH/Al ratio = 4, the main precipitate phase at 20°C was Mg(H₂O)_n[Al(OH)₄]₂ admixed with some Al(OH)₃; at solution OH/Al ratio = 5, the main phase was Mg₂(H₂O)₄[Al₂(OH)₁₀]; at solution OH/Al ratio = 7, the main phase was Mg₄(H₂O)_n(OH)₄[Al₂(OH)₁₀] while at solution OH/Al ratio = 9, the main phase was Mg₆(H₂O)_n(OH)₈[Al₂(OH)₁₀] admixed with some Mg(OH)₂. These hydrates were dehydrated at 60–100°C probably to the compounds Mg₂[Al₂O₃(OH)₄], Mg₄(OH)₄[Al₂O₃(OH)₄] and Mg₆(OH)₈[Al₂O₃(OH)₄], respectively.     

The coprecipitation of magnesium hydroxide aluminium hydroxide powders from aqueous solution with sodium hydroxide: Precipitate compositions and coprecipitation mechanisms

Magnesium aluminium hydroxides were coprecipitated from different mixed metal cation solutions — at total C_M = 0.1 M and Mg/Al₂ ratios from 1 to 6 — with sodium hydroxide solution at ambient temperature, with different pre-ageing conditions for the aluminium hydroxide pre-precipitate. The coprecipitations were monitored by potentiometric (pH) titration and the final precipitate compositions were examined by chemical analysis, infrared spectrophotometry and thermal analysis. Magnesium hydroxide was coprecipitated onto completely recrystallised aluminium hydroxide as a simple mixture. Generally, with no to three days pre-ageing, microcrystalline aluminium hydroxide was first precipitated at pH about 4; this then partially redissolved on further addition of sodium hydroxide (to form hydroxoaluminate anion) and magnesium aluminium hydroxide coprecipitates were formed continuously at pHs from 8.0–8.7 to 12.0–12.5. Their compositions were similar to the magnesium hydroxoaluminate hydrates formed by direct precipitation from high pH sodium hydroxoaluminate solutions.      

Structural and spectroscopic study of Mg13.4(OH)6(HVO4)2(H0.2VO4)6

Single‐crystals of the polar compound magnesium hydrogen vanadate(V), Mg_13.4(OH)₆(HVO₄)₂(H_0.2VO₄)₆, were synthesized hydrothermally. It represents the first hydrogen vanadate(V) among inorganic compounds. Its structure was determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction [space group P 6₃mc, a = 12.9096(2), c = 5.0755(1) Å, V = 732.55(2) ų, Z = 1]. The crystal structure of Mg_13.4(OH)₆(HVO₄)₂(H_0.2VO₄)₆ consists of well separated, vacancy‐interrupted chains of face sharing Mg2O₆ octahedra, with short Mg2—Mg2 distances of 2.537(1) Å, embedded in a porous magnesium vanadate 3D framework having the topology of the zeolite cancrinite. All three hydrogen positions in the structure were confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy. (© 2008 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Synthesis of magnesium oxysulfate whiskers in the presence of sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate

Uniform magnesium oxysulfate (5Mg(OH)₂·MgSO₄·3H₂O) whiskers with a length of 10‐15 µm and a diameter of 0.4‐1.0 µm were synthesized in the presence of sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (Na‐SO₃‐C₆H₄‐C₁₂H₂₅) at 200°C for 1 h, using MgSO₄·7H₂O and NaOH as the reactants. Mg(OH)₂ precursor with poor crystallization and small crystal size was formed owing to the adsorption of sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate on the Mg(OH)₂ surface. The quick dissolution of Mg(OH)₂ precursor in the subsequent hydrothermal reaction inhibited the occurrence of the sector‐like byproduct and promoted the formation of magnesium oxysulfate whiskers with uniform morphology. (© 2008 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

The coprecipitation of zinc aluminium hydroxides (refractory-, absorbent-, and catalyst precursors) from aqueous solution with ammonium hydroxide: Precipitate compositions and coprecipitation mechanisms

Zinc aluminium hydroxide hydrates were coprecipitated from different mixed cation solutions at Zn/Al₂ ratios from 1/2 to 4/1. The coprecipitations were monitored by potentiometric titrations and the final coprecipitate compositions were examined by chemical analysis and atomic absorption spectrophotometry, X-ray diffraction and preliminary thermal analysis. The product from Zn/Al₂ = 1/2 solution was amorphous: at Zn/Al₂ = 1/1.5, the main phase (after drying at 95 °C) was a zinc hydroxoaluminate Zn[Al(OH)₄]₂ together with some gibbsite: at Zn/Al₂ = 1, the main phase was probably a solid solution (of Zn[Al(OH)₄]₂ with Zn₂[Al₂(OH)₁₀]) together with Zn₂[Al₂(OH)₁₀]: at Zn/Al₂ = 2, the main phase was a mixture of Zn₂[Al₂(OH)₁₀] with (ZnOH)₄ [Al₂(OH)₁₀] and some gibbsite: at Zn/Al₂ = 4, the main phase was (ZnOH)₄ [Al₂(OH)₁₀] with some zinc hydroxide.     

Distribution of Cations and the Proton Location in Kaersutite

The crystal of Kaersutite, (Na_0.63K_0.37Ca_1.99) (Mg_3.10Fe_0.98Al_0.51Mn_0.01Ti₀₅₅) (Si_6.07Al_1.93) (O, OH)₂₄ from lecality Vlčí Hora – Bohemia was studied by powder neutron diffraction. The refinement of the crystal structure within space group C2/m gave cell dimensions a = 0.9863, b = 1.8040 and c = 0.5306 nm, β = 105° 28′, Z = 2. Protons were found to form bridges between two 03 ioxygens. (This location allows for the existence of proton per f.u. in maximum). The actual population was refined to 0.8. The occupation of the five eation sites was determined as follows: M 1 (0.60 Mg + 0.25 Ti + 0.10 Al + 0.05 Fe), M 2 (0.50 Mg + 0.35 Fe + 0.15 Al), M 3 (0.8 Mg + p.2 Fe), M 4 (Ca) and A (Na, K).     

The precipitation of calcium hydroxoaluminate hydrate powders from sodium hydroxoaluminate solutions: Precipitate phases and precipitation mechanisms

Calcium hydroxoaluminate hydrates were precipitated from different sodium hydroxoaluminate and hydroxoaluminate-excess hydroxide solutions at ambient temperature (at C_Al = 0.1 to 0.3 M and at XS OH/Al = 0 to above 8). The precipitations were monitored by potentiometric (pH) measurements. Precipitate morphologies were examined by optical microscopy and precipitate compositions were determine by chemical analysis, infra-red spectrophotometry and thermal analysis. Generally at OH/Al ratios of 4 to 4.5 (XS OH/Al = 1 to 1.5), the compound 2 CaO · · Al₂O₃ · 8 H₂O (C₂AH₈) was precipitated with some aluminium hydroxide; then at OH/Al ratios of 5 to above 11 (XS OH/Al = 2 to above 8), the compound 2 CaO · Al₂O₃ · 8 H₂O was precipitated with increasing amounts of the compound 4 CaO · Al₂O₃ · 13 H₂O (C₄AH₁₃).     

Dislocation Structure of Epitaxial Ferrite-Spinel Films

The dislocation structure of ferrite-spinel films obtained on the (001) plane of magnesium oxide has been studied. For the films of Mn and Mg Mn ferrites there has been found the formation of a cellular dislocation structure, complex dislocation clusters, for the Li ferrite the twinning. Experimental data are compared with the predictions of the theory of relaxation of internal stresses in heteroepitaxial structures. It has been shown that in the Li → Mn → Mg Mn ferrite the energy at the interface of magnesium ferrite and oxide ranges from 64 to 9 mJ · m⁻², the absolute magnitude of lattice mismatch at a synthesis temperature being 10.328 to 3.451 × 10⁻³ and the critical thickness of a continuous film 0.02–0.1 μm. The formation of three-dimensional islets-nuclei hinders the obtaining of pseudomorphous continuous films. The critical radius (R_cr) of a pseudomorphous islet in the same series of ferrites is 0.2–1.1 μm. For Li ferrite R_exp > R_er, for Mg Mn R_exp < R_er, that determines the prevailing types of defects. The process of relaxation of thermal stresses is associated with the overcoming of interaction barriers by dislocations and largely dependent on the film composition and temperature.     

Synthesis and crystal structure of hexaaquamagnesium hydrogen phosphododecatungstate tetrahydrate [Mg(H2O)6][HPW12O40]·4H2O

Crystals suitable for X-ray structure analysis were obtained after the slow evaporation of the reaction mixture containing equimolar quantities of magnesium chloride and dodecatungstophosphoric acid aqueous solution insuring pH of the solution between 1.0 and 1.2. This simple synthetic route yielded stability of Keggin anion and high quality [Mg(H₂O)₆][HPW₁₂O₄₀]·4H₂O single crystals. The obtained compound belongs to the group of heteropoly compounds and its structure is composed of Keggin [PW₁₂O₄₀]^3– anions, [Mg(H₂O)₆]²⁺ cations and lattice water molecules. Zigzag arrangement of Keggin anions along c-axis creates irregular channels occupied by [Mg(H₂O)₆]²⁺ cations and lattice H₂O molecules. The calculation of the total potential solvent volume indicated the presence of 4.1 lattice H₂O lattice molecules per formula unit, which is in agreement with the here presented structural model. The position of one lattice water molecule is well defined, while each of three other molecules is statistically distributed over two locations. Hydrogen bonds involve all coordinated and lattice H₂O molecules, as well as some oxygen atoms from the Keggin anion. (© 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Crystal and Molecular Structure of 1-Ethyl-3-[tris(trimethylsiloxanyl)silyl]pyrrolinium Hydrochloride

The crystal and molecular structure of 1-Ethyl-3[tris(trimethylsiloxyl)silyl]pyrrolinium hydro-chloride (C₁₅H₃₈N⁺O₃Si₄ · C¹⁻) has been determined by direct methods. The title compound crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c with a = 20.640(3), b = 19.494(2), c = 27.34(3) Å, β = 90.60(4)°, V = 11000(13) ų, Z = 16, D_x = 1.034 Mg m⁻³. There are two molecules with different conformations in the crystal. The pyrroline rings are non-planar.-The Si O Si angles range from 149(1)° to 163(1)°. Two of the SiMe₃ groups are disordered. All molecules are connected by C¹⁻ – N⁺ contacts and C¹⁻ - HN⁺ hydrogen bonds to form double chains.     

Some Physicochemical Parameters of Saturated Ternary Solutions of Systems with Mixed Crystals in their Solid Phase

The measurements of density (ϱ), viscosity (η) and hydration number (n_h) of saturated solutions of ternary systems KCl KBr H₂O, K₂SO₄ (NH₄)₂SO₄ H₂O and KNO₃ NH₄NO₃ H₂O with mixed crystals in the solid phase have been conducted. It has been confirmed, that the occurence of the extremes on the curves of dependence of the properties (ϱ, η, n_h) on the composition of saturated solution may be the base for the supposition that beside mixed crystals the double salts have also been formed in the solid phase of a given system.     

The struvite‐type compounds M [Mg(H2O)6](X O4), where M = Rb,Tl and X = P,As

Phases with composition M [Mg(H₂O)₆](X O₄), where M = Rb, Tl and X = P, As, were obtained by means of the gelatine‐gel diffusion technique from Mg‐EDTA and corresponding metal phosphate/arsenate solutions at pH > 9. The crystal structures were determined from single crystal X‐ray diffractometer data sets. All compounds crystallize isotypically with two formula units in the orthorhombic struvite [NH₄[Mg(H₂O)₆](PO₄)] structure type in space group Pmn 2₁ and with lattice parameters of a ≈ 6.88, b ≈ 6.16, c ≈ 11.34 Å. The structures consist of slightly distorted [Mg(OH₂)₆] octahedra (m symmetry), X O₄ tetrahedra (m symmetry) and [M O₁₀] polyhedra (m symmetry) as single building units, held together by an intricate hydrogen bonding network. The structure can also be described as made up of closed packed pseudo ‐hexagonal layers of [Mg(OH₂)₆] units stacked along [010] with the X O₄ tetrahedra and the M atoms in the voids of this arrangement. (© 2008 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Structure of “bis(methoxymagnesium)diselenide”: A reagent for the introduction of selenium into organic molecules

The reaction of magnesium and selenium in dry methanol has been reported to yield a reagent tentatively identified as bis(methoxymagnesium) diselenide. The dark red-brown solution obtained from this reaction yielded red crystals that crystallized in the monoclinic space group C2/c, a=17.391(4) ?, b=15.823(3) ?, c=21.626(4) ?, β=110.71(3)°, V=5566.5(19) ?³, Z=4, R=0.0350, wR₂=0.0850 for 4930 reflections. X-ray crystallographic analysis of this reagent showed it to be dodecamethanol-tetramethoxy-di(μ₄-hydroxy)tetra(μ₃-methoxy)hexamagnesium hexaselenide, Mg₆(μ₄-OH)₂(μ₃-OCH₃)₄(OCH₃)₄(CH₃OH)₁₂]Se₆·2CH₃OH (1), not the bis(methoxymagnesium) diselenide as previously described. The structure of 1 is composed of six magnesium ions and six bridging oxygen-containing ligands in a face-sharing cubic arrangement.